Re: correction to gre(4) man page
On 12 Apr 2009, at 23:47, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:40:08PM +0200, Pete Vickers wrote: SEE ALSO section, entry for Web Cache Coordination Protocol V1.0, link is broken. A suitable replacement is: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99jul/I-D/draft-ietf-wrec-web-pro-00.txt /Pete that link works fine here. jmc ahh, indeed. The culprit was the man->html conversion for this: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=gre where the URL is line wrapped, but the html does not take it into account. thanks for pointing it out. /Pete
Re: European orders
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:29:22AM +0930, David Walker wrote: [citation needed] >>> http://bit.ly/3dMFBs >>Best message on this thread in days. > > Agreed. > Several gems in a row. > >>And probably the last one worth reading. Including this one. All are invited >>to join me in a nice hot cup of STFU. > > Subscribed to show my appreciation ... > Thanks for the roflcopters. > Now to unsubscribe. Don't unsubscribe from the list, just killfile the thread. ;-) > Best wishes. CU, Sico. --
The "match" syntax
Hi Misc@, I'd like to ask if "match" syntax has entirely usable to option like rtable, queue etc. I use old syntax like "pass in from a.b.c.d/e to any rtable 1 queue (queue1, queue2)". I'd like to update my 4.5-current, so I need to confirm this is still a valid syntax or I just have to replace with the "match" syntax. Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom
Re: The "match" syntax
On 2009-04-13, Insan Praja SW wrote: > I'd like to ask if "match" syntax has entirely usable to option like > rtable, queue etc. I use old syntax like "pass in from a.b.c.d/e to any > rtable 1 queue (queue1, queue2)". I'd like to update my 4.5-current, so I > need to confirm this is still a valid syntax or I just have to replace > with the "match" syntax. match takes the same syntax as the other filter rules (pass/block) and is purely an addition. unlike scrub rules, you don't need to touch existing filter rules. if you want to check that your ruleset parses ok before you touch the real kernel and binaries, you can just extract pfctl from a new snapshot under /tmp and run /tmp/sbin/pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf.
Re: The "match" syntax
Hi Misc@ and Stuart, On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:51:37 +0700, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009-04-13, Insan Praja SW wrote: I'd like to ask if "match" syntax has entirely usable to option like rtable, queue etc. I use old syntax like "pass in from a.b.c.d/e to any rtable 1 queue (queue1, queue2)". I'd like to update my 4.5-current, so I need to confirm this is still a valid syntax or I just have to replace with the "match" syntax. match takes the same syntax as the other filter rules (pass/block) and is purely an addition. unlike scrub rules, you don't need to touch existing filter rules. if you want to check that your ruleset parses ok before you touch the real kernel and binaries, you can just extract pfctl from a new snapshot under /tmp and run /tmp/sbin/pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf. Thanks for the info, several adjustment to scrub has been done, I'll get back to you with updates. Best Regards, Insan Praja SW -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom
Re: Serial connection settings on Sun Ultra 1
Nick Holland kirjoitti viestissddn (ldhetysaika maanantai, 13. huhtikuuta 2009 02:59:47): > Aapo Lehtinen wrote: > > Hello > > > > I'm trying to get Sun Fire V100 working using old ultra 1 machine > > (obsd4.4/sparc64) as terminal. I'm using tip(1). The problem is > > connection dies easily with "Lost Carrier. [EOT]". Now, I'm bit new to > > using serial connections so I've only tried tweaking /etc/ttys by > > changing type from sun to vt100, and comments from local to rtscts to > > softcar. > > It is unclear what machine you are changing, but changing /etc/ttys is > definitely wrong. Restore them to stock before doing ANYTHING else. > All you are doing here is breaking things. You do not need to change any > files to get a tip(1) session going with a Sun machine. > > If you are getting a "lost carrier" response, you need to look at the > machine you are getting that from -- i.e., your terminal machine. > > What command are you using to try to establish the connection? > > Nick. I've used 'tip -9600 ttya' and 'cu -l ttya', both have the same effect. If I log into ALOM/OpenBoot I can tweak settings for 10-20 secods before hangup. Connection stays up during diagnostics etc. (i.e lots of output) So there is some setting I should set up that prevents connection dying when there is no output, I suppose. Aapo
grub2 chainloading openbsd
I see that the configuration for grub2 is now a convoluted nightmare of shell scripts. While I'm a fan of shellscripting, I'm more a fan of K.I.S.S. and the new grub2 is preventing direct manipulation configuration by overwritting the grub.cfg file. I am now looking for any ready-made scripts to chainload openbsd that I can adapt for my own use. Are there any good (or bad) examples of chainloading (or booting directly) openbsd from grub2? Regards -Lars
Low power OpenBSD machine
Hi, My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with OpenBSD. Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? Cheers, Tim.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Hi, I'm running an OpenBSD on a machine that uses about 24 Watts. The machine is an intel celeron 500MHz, 128MB RAM, cdrom, three realtek nics and the system runs under a pendrive. I take the hardware from an old IBM PC300GL machine. This processor does not need cooler, the uniq cooler is inside the power supply. I do not use hard disk and the cdrom is for boot only, but I can use it after that. Note that the USB interface is 1.1 only, but for me it is ok. The motherboard has two usb ports, serial, parallel, audio and video onboard. Cheers, Paulo. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:31:52PM +1000, Timothy Hume wrote: * Hi, * * My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low * power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a * Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will * be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital * photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet * and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I * obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with * OpenBSD. * * Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 * Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? * * Cheers, * * Tim. * -- Paulo Manoel Mafra Grupo de Computacao Segura e Confiavel - GCSEG Departamento de Automacao e Sistemas Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina "Vitam Impendere Vero"
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no
noise. With 3 NICs it uses less than 1A.
OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC) #976: Fri Jul 11 16:41:38 MDT 2008
pvalc...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Transmeta(tm) Crusoe(tm) Processor TM5800 ("GenuineTMx86" 586-class) 732
MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,CX8,SEP,CMOV,SER,MMX
real mem = 251146240 (239MB)
avail mem = 234598400 (223MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 10/10/03, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfa2b0, SMBIOS
rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0800 (31 entries)
bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies, LTD version "786W2 v1.07" date 10/10/2003
bios0: Hewlett-Packard hp t5000 series
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP
acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) LAN0(S5) USB0(S4) USB1(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2
acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0xa000
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Transmeta LongRun Northbridge" rev 0x03
"Transmeta Mem1" rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured
"Transmeta Mem2" rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured
em0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq 11,
address 00:04:23:ab:6e:68
em1 at pci0 dev 11 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq 10,
address 00:04:23:ab:6e:69
vga1 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "ATI Rage XL" rev 0x27
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pcib0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "VIA VT8231 ISA" rev 0x10
pciide0 at pci0 dev 17 function 1 "VIA VT82C571 IDE" rev 0x06: ATA100, channel
0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: < 256MB ATA Flash Disk>
wd0: 1-sector PIO, LBA, 245MB, 501760 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
uhci0 at pci0 dev 17 function 2 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x1e: irq 5
uhci1 at pci0 dev 17 function 3 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x1e: irq 5
viaenv0 at pci0 dev 17 function 4 "VIA VT8231 PMG" rev 0x10: failed to map PM
I/O space
vr0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 "VIA RhineII-2" rev 0x51: irq 15, address
00:0b:cd:6d:81:ae
ukphy0 at vr0 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 5: OUI 0x004063,
model 0x0032
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0:
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0 "VIA UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "VIA UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
biomask 71ed netmask fded ttymask
umass0 at uhub1 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "SMI Corporation USB DISK"
rev 2.00/11.00 addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: <, , 1100> SCSI0 0/direct removable
sd0: 991MB, 126 cyl, 255 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 2030592 sec total
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:31:52PM +1000, Timothy Hume wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low
> power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a
> Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will
> be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital
> photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet
> and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I
> obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with
> OpenBSD.
>
> Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30
> Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Timothy Hume skrev: Hi, My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with OpenBSD. Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? Cheers, Tim. ALIX from PC-Engine: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix3d3.htm Fit-PC Slim: http://www.fit-pc.com/new/slim-linux.html /Johan
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:59:31AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no > noise. With 3 NICs it uses less than 1A. > > em0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq 11, > address 00:04:23:ab:6e:68 > em1 at pci0 dev 11 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq 10, > address 00:04:23:ab:6e:69 Is this em(4) installed through an optional PCI expansion module? I can't seem to find any models that come with multiple NICs. Thanks
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
There is one pci slot in it so i dropped a dual em in it. Did have to use a 1A power supply instead of a 500mA one :-) On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 07:58:28AM -0700, Aaron Stellman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:59:31AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no > > noise. With 3 NICs it uses less than 1A. > > > > em0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq > > 11, address 00:04:23:ab:6e:68 > > em1 at pci0 dev 11 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq > > 10, address 00:04:23:ab:6e:69 > > Is this em(4) installed through an optional PCI expansion module? I > can't seem to find any models that come with multiple NICs. > Thanks
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
* Marco Peereboom [2009-04-13 16:21]: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:31:52PM +1000, Timothy Hume wrote: > > Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 > > Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? > Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no > noise. With 3 NICs it uses less than 1A. 1A * 120V = 120VA ~= 120W -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:40:57PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Marco Peereboom [2009-04-13 16:21]: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:31:52PM +1000, Timothy Hume wrote: > > > Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 > > > Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? > > Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no > > noise. With 3 NICs it uses less than 1A. > > 1A * 120V = 120VA ~= 120W I believe they run on 12V power supplies. so it's max 12W
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
What about the Intel Atom, there is a version targeted for kind of embedded systems. Think its called z5xx or something. Its a x86, so i suppose its well supported? i'm buying 1 soonish, board, with no fan, 2GB ram , and a case. Adding a semi old harddisk 2.5" from my own drawers. Total is about 200 Euros. Or is it to fast for you ? :) I think it use about 30 W because of a chipset that uses quite a lot of power. Something about a chip set that uses much more power than the cpu (about 22 W) But there is a chipset with lower wattage, but you have too look for it. Check out this wikipedia article, see "power requirements" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverthorne_(CPU) And then there is offcourse the core duo bugs?, to think about, isnt there? mic
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:40:57PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > 1A * 120V = 120VA ~= 120W Assuming cos(O) is somewhere near unity, which isn't a good assumption to make even though it's increasingly close in new switching power supplies. In the case of autoranging supplies it's usually pretty good. Small switching supplies like ones for sokeris etc. can be pretty bad. Linear supplies will also be far from 1. -- Jussi Peltola
Thar she blows!
4.5 is on the way! - Forwarded message from OpenBSD Shipping - Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:14:41 -0700 (MST) From: OpenBSD Shipping To: /home/shipping/mail/shipc...@qubit.computershop.ca, epe...@walkereng.com Subject: USPS OpenBSD Order:2009/3/5-22:5:56-7333: USPS tracking number...
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Also have a look at the fanless VIA C7 processor. Timothy Hume wrote: > Hi, > > My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low > power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a > Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will > be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital > photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet > and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I > obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with > OpenBSD. > > Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 > Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? > > Cheers, > > Tim.
Re: spam from chrooted CMSes
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:42:21AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > I'm running postfix as MTA on a machine with several CMS, on a chrooted > Apache. Recently, there is a huge number of spam being sent from there, > alas. When I scan the postfix-logs, all those come from 'root', meaning > they don't come through port 25. I run OpenBSD with mini-sendmail, and > now I wonder how I could find out from which CMS they are sent. Is there > any chance to find out from which CMS they are sent? It'll take a little bit of effort on your part, but you can compare the time and date in the maillog with the apache logs. It should become apparent very quickly which CMS the spam is coming from as you will see a repeated number of hits in your apache log within close proximity of the times in the maillog.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Timothy Hume wrote: Hi, My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital photos web browsing implying mozilla products? Or do you like lynx? If Mozilla stuff, you want MASSIVELY more powerful than a Soekris. digital photos implies a fair amount of storage, as well. If "managing" your digipics means more than "cp" and "rm", then again, you need some CPU. > and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with OpenBSD. Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? a PIII-class system with an i810 chipset will probably come in below 30W when idle. (Other chipsets may, too...but I put the Wattmeter on a 500MHz PIII with an i810 chipset, with both a real disk and a flash disk, and it came in at under 30W when CPU was idle). HOWEVER, if you kick your numbers up a little, to maybe 50W, I think you will find most simple P4 systems will do nicely for you, and be a lot less painful for graphical web browsing and image editing. Get a wattmeter. Great investment... Much of what people assume is not overly accurate. Nick.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Hi Timothy, Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? I am very happy with several mini-itx systems, both from VIA and from Jetway. For instance, a VIA VB7002 with 1.5Ghz C7-D CPU and 2Gb of RAM cost me 89 euro's, including 19% VAT. A kernel build takes some 15 minutes and a full `make build` 120 minutes. I'm using this baby for a low power server, so I'm not bothered by the Unichrome graphics thingy. Intel has a few mini-itx desktop boards, both with Atom and Celeron CPUs that are dirt cheap; I have a few of those running perfectly aswell. You could equip them with 2.5" harddisks to keep the power consumption pretty low, probably below 30 Watts. Good luck!... Nico
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
A
hw.model=Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 230 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
hw.ncpu=1
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.sensors.cpu0.temp0=12.00 degC
hw.sensors.admtm0.temp0=31.00 degC (Internal)
hw.sensors.admtm0.temp1=38.00 degC (External)
hw.sensors.admtm0.temp2=34.00 degC (External)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt0=2.53 VDC (2.5 V)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt1=0.00 VDC (Vccp)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt2=3.37 VDC (3.3 V)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt3=5.03 VDC (5 V)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt4=12.00 VDC (12 V)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt5=3.39 VDC (Vcc)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt6=1.57 VDC (1.5 V)
hw.sensors.admtm0.volt7=1.77 VDC (1.8 V)
hw.cpuspeed=1597
hw.vendor=Intel Corporation
hw.product=D945GCLF
Works fine for me.
2009/4/13 Nico Meijer :
> Hi Timothy,
>
>> Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30
>> Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend?
>
> I am very happy with several mini-itx systems, both from VIA and from
> Jetway.
>
> For instance, a VIA VB7002 with 1.5Ghz C7-D CPU and 2Gb of RAM cost me 89
> euro's, including 19% VAT. A kernel build takes some 15 minutes and a full
> `make build` 120 minutes. I'm using this baby for a low power server, so I'm
> not bothered by the Unichrome graphics thingy.
>
> Intel has a few mini-itx desktop boards, both with Atom and Celeron CPUs
> that are dirt cheap; I have a few of those running perfectly aswell.
>
> You could equip them with 2.5" harddisks to keep the power consumption
> pretty low, probably below 30 Watts.
>
> Good luck!... Nico
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
I have one of these - http://www.soekris.com/net4801.htm comes in at <15W 2009/4/13 Nico Meijer : > Hi Timothy, > >> Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 >> Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? > > I am very happy with several mini-itx systems, both from VIA and from > Jetway. > > For instance, a VIA VB7002 with 1.5Ghz C7-D CPU and 2Gb of RAM cost me 89 > euro's, including 19% VAT. A kernel build takes some 15 minutes and a full > `make build` 120 minutes. I'm using this baby for a low power server, so I'm > not bothered by the Unichrome graphics thingy. > > Intel has a few mini-itx desktop boards, both with Atom and Celeron CPUs > that are dirt cheap; I have a few of those running perfectly aswell. > > You could equip them with 2.5" harddisks to keep the power consumption > pretty low, probably below 30 Watts. > > Good luck!... Nico > > -- Adam Retter
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Has anyone had experience with eBox? They look interesting... http://www.wdlsystems.com/ebox/ebox.shtml -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
4.5 is on the way
I just received a confirmation/tracking number for the shipment of my 4.5 CD.
Re: European orders
On 13/04/2009, Sico Bruins wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:29:22AM +0930, David Walker wrote: > > [citation needed] http://bit.ly/3dMFBs >>>Best message on this thread in days. >> >> Agreed. >> Several gems in a row. >> >>>And probably the last one worth reading. Including this one. All are >>> invited >>>to join me in a nice hot cup of STFU. >> >> Subscribed to show my appreciation ... >> Thanks for the roflcopters. >> Now to unsubscribe. > > Don't unsubscribe from the list, just killfile the thread. ;-) > >> Best wishes. > > CU, Sico. > > -- > I think I will unsubscribe. Information overload. I like the quiet life. Best wishes.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Timothy Hume wrote: > My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low > power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a > Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will > be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital > photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet > and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I > obviously want to build something which works "perfectly" with > OpenBSD. > > Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 > Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? Almost any modern notebook will use less than 30 watts and be significantly more powerful than a Soekris.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
--- On Mon, 4/13/09, Timothy Hume wrote: > From: Timothy Hume > Subject: Low power OpenBSD machine > To: misc@openbsd.org > Date: Monday, April 13, 2009, 7:31 AM > > Hi, > > My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building > a new low power consumption machine. I want something a bit > more powerful than a Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the > fastest machine around. I will be using the machine for web > browsing, Email, managing my digital photos and so on. The main > requirement is that the machine is quiet and has a low power > consumption so I can leave it on all the time. I obviously > want to build something which works "perfectly" with OpenBSD. > > Is it possible to build something like I describe which > uses under 30 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people > recommend? I've gotten good results with version 1.0 of the Fit-PC (www.fit-pc.com). You can probably still get one of those on clearance for US $195. Looking at the specs, I'd expect the newer version to work well too (although with only one LAN port, I wouldn't be able to use it for my application).
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:59:11AM -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: > Almost any modern notebook will use less than 30 watts and be > significantly more powerful than a Soekris. Get a used ThinkPad and swap in a bigger drive. You'll get a superior keyboard and silent operation on top of Really Working (tm) hardware. My T40p was not much more expensive than an atom box or soekris and it runs very cool, staying room-temperature at zero load. The port replicators should be really cheap on ebay now if you want to connect more desktop-y peripherals. And they, of course, run OpenBSD, even though I currently don't run it on mine. Besides, the ThinkPad is still in good shape after quite a few beverages - much better than I on those nights... And, as a side note, I'd not recommend cheaper laptops, they are quite sucky and I'd much prefer an old ThinkPad to a more expensive new plasticy thing that sounds like it's going to take off until the fan fails after a year... let alone the icky hardware with driver pains. -- Jussi Peltola
Re: donation
Ingo Schwarze wrote: Hi misc@, some days ago, i publicly asked Wim to tell me what he did with the donation i sent him via IBAN for the OpenBSD project, whether he kept it or whether he passed it on to the project, see the posting included below. --8<-- The posting cited below started a private communication involving Wim and myself and consisting of several mails. Since it was a private communication, i'm not going to publish any details, but i feel that i should provide a rough summary to the list, regarding the central question where the particular donation money went that i sent via IBAN to Belgium in October 2007. Since I heard of Ingo doing this, I mailed Wim to ask about the money we sent via him from the 2006 and 2007 Slackathon fund-raiser/conferences in Sweden. More or less the same story for me, I wont go into details, but the general outline is like this: First the money was all sent to Theo according to Wim, then I asked if I could get a refund, given the fact that since so little money went from Europe to Theo, it would almost be only my fundraiser money during the last two years or other european donations, but not both at the same time. Wim agreed to a refund, and I got 6500 EUR back, which will be handed over to OpenBSD on the f2k9 mini-hackathon. I know far too little about accounting or legal details to know if something was fishy here or not, or from where the money did come that was returned to me. I am thankful my fundraiser cash can now reach the final destination and Wim did not give me a hard time either during this time, when I figure his stress levels might have been peaking. So all in all, another ~6500 EUR that will reach OpenBSD from Sweden, to add to the list.
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
You need to go get yourself a EE degree :-) On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:40:57PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Marco Peereboom [2009-04-13 16:21]: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:31:52PM +1000, Timothy Hume wrote: > > > Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30 > > > Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend? > > Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no > > noise. With 3 NICs it uses less than 1A. > > 1A * 120V = 120VA ~= 120W > > -- > Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org > BS Web Services, http://bsws.de > Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services > Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
-stable 4.4 - a bunch of config problems
Hi list, I've build -stable 4.4 and attempt to run a full desktop box, but I'm facing the following problems: 1) I can't update xenocara source # cvs -d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_4_4 -Pd downloads nothing and shows no messages although tried from /usr/xenocara or /usr 2) GNOME is incredibly slow, it takes minutes to load, while the background image appears about half an hour afterward; 3) I can't make firefox3 and privoxy to get along I tried to fix the problems under 2 and 3 above by removing packages built from ports and installing again by pkg_add but achieved the same result. Even worse, I don't know where to look for debug messages. If there is a chance to help me at least by directing me to use proper command and/or file to look for messages, I'll be very grateful. Thanks in advance
Re: -stable 4.4 - a bunch of config problems
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:44:48 +0200 "soko.tica" wrote: > Hi list, > > I've build -stable 4.4 and attempt to run a full desktop box, but I'm > facing the following problems: > > 1) I can't update xenocara source # cvs -d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_4_4 > -Pd downloads nothing and shows no messages although tried from > /usr/xenocara or /usr > You're possibly using a cvs mirror that doesn't have the xenocara tree. > 2) GNOME is incredibly slow, it takes minutes to load, while the > background image appears about half an hour afterward; > You'll hate me for saying this but... dump GNOME. You'll hate me even more for saying this but... try cwm (in Xbase) and/or scrotwm (in ports/x11/scrotwm or possibly as a package?) After you're done hating me, you'll love all the screen space. > 3) I can't make firefox3 and privoxy to get along > > I tried to fix the problems under 2 and 3 above by removing packages > built from ports and installing again by pkg_add but achieved the same > result. > Did you follow the pkg instructions? $ pkg_info -i privoxy Also, you might need to configure it (/etc/privoxy) The above is true for tor. My guess is you don't have it/them running/configured. -- J.C. Roberts
PROPOSSITION CONFIDENTIALE
You are invited to "PROPOSSITION CONFIDENTIALE". By your host Karim Aladin: Date: Monday April 13, 2009 Time: 9:00 pm - 10:00 pm (GMT +00:00) Location: Cher Ami Bonjour, Je suis le Directeur en charge de l'audit Banque section de compte etrangee de la BANQUE INTERNATIONALE DU BURKINA (BIB), j'ai besoin de votre aide urgente dans le transfert de la somme de ($ 12,millions) Douze Millon de dollars americaine immidiatement ` votre compte.ci ga vous intersse je vous enverrons tous les ditails sur la fagon dont on va fait le demache et igalement noter que vous aurez 30% du montant indiqui ci-dessus si vous jtes d'accord pour m'aider ` exicuter cette transaction. Guests: * filmv...@yahoo.ca * kandu...@yahoo.ca * peartre...@hotmail.com * melaniea...@videotron.ca * frederic_champ...@yahoo.ca * la...@cismsun.univ-lyon1.fr * emethentrepr...@yahoo.ca * nic...@sympatico.ca * richard_ro...@yahoo.ca * soucy.j...@forces.gc.ca * globetroter1...@hotmail.com * pellej2...@yahoo.ca * mypic...@cslaval.qc.ca * agqque...@yahoo.ca * jpz...@yahoo.ca * ecobes...@yahoo.fr * collectifliberte...@yahoo.ca * aaaoutl...@yahoo.ca * eric.arsenea...@sympatico.ca * mna...@yahoo.ca * gbelange...@yahoo.ca * ffpay...@yahoo.ca * comabouc...@waxmandorval.combrouillardbibeaugariepy * yahoo.camemichelboudrea...@globetrotter.net * jfpoup...@yahoo.ca * chahine-ro...@yahoo.com * chawkihi...@videotron.ca * dr_hi...@yahoo.ca * taghorticult...@yahoo.ca * jacquessoulie...@yahoo.ca * jlemme...@videotron.ca * richelie...@yahoo.ca * harmonie_e...@yahoo.ca * melaniehoule2...@yahoo.ca * jeanhudon...@sympatico.ca * i...@reneehudonparolepublique.com * rfre...@yahoo.ca * jean-yves.grego...@cgi.com * docnad...@videotron.ca * criteriumk22...@yahoo.ca * maurel_coulo...@yahoo.ca * biensculturelsbross...@yahoo.ca * joseev...@yahoo.ca * jean.ne...@videotron.ca * arne.a...@gmail.com * topcop382...@yahoo.ca * bro...@parl.gc.ca * marcoux.jeanfranc...@baznet.ic.gc.ca * khoatra...@yahoo.ca * cmdremich...@yahoo.ca * ubo...@yahoo.ca * isabelle_bouche...@hotmail.com * jeanmichel.lacr...@adaltis.com * t_tru...@yahoo.ca * lucieve...@yahoo.ca * mjmerc...@maskatel.net * mariechristinetaille...@yahoo.ca * chau.t...@ices.on.ca * jean-francois.boi...@mcgill.ca * iftice...@yahoo.fr * pascalmichau...@hotmail.com * ducbr...@yahoo.ca * jphildu...@yahoo.ca * mm...@yahoo.ca * mmi...@yahoo.com * m...@yahoo.ca * mmu...@yahoo.com * mm...@yahoo.ca.uk * misc@openbsd.org * math...@bidon.ca * goodbrownie...@hotmail.com * annie.whi...@rbc.com * anniedmur...@yahoo.ca.uk * christian_le...@hotmail.com * bbba...@yahoo.ca.uk * bbbo...@yahoo.ca.uk * leo_se...@hotmail.com * mescollecti...@hotmail.com * lolo_viole...@hotmail.com * memorand...@hotmail.com invitation_add_to_your_yahoo_calendar: http://calendar.yahoo.com/?v=60&ST=20090413T21%2B&TITLE=PROPOSSITION+CONFIDENTIALE&DUR=0100&VIEW=d&in_loc=Cher+Ami+Bonjour,+Je+suis+le+Directeur+en+charge+de+l%27audit+Banque+section+de+compte+etrangee+de+la+BANQUE+INTERNATIONALE+DU+BURKINA+(BIB),+j%27ai+besoin+de+votre+aide+urgente+dans+le+transfert+de+la+somme+de+($+12,millions)+Douze+Millon+de+dollars+americaine+imm%c3%a9diatement+%c3%a0+votre+compte.ci+%c3%a7a+vous+intersse+je+vous+enverrons+tous+les+d%c3%a9tails+sur+la+fa%c3%a7on+dont+on+va+fait+le+demache+et+%c3%a9galement+noter+que+vous+aurez+30%25+du+montant+indiqu%c3%a9+ci-dessus+si+vous+%c3%aates+d%27accord+pour+m%27aider+%c3%a0+ex%c3%a9cuter+cette+transaction.&TYPE=10 Copyright ) 2009 All Rights Reserved www.yahoo.com Privacy Policy: http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us Terms of Service: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: Intel D945GCNL with OpenBSD 4.4 Hangs
Marcello if you like that Series of Intel motherboards, i can assure you
that D945GCPE works just fine:
OpenBSD 4.2-stable (GENERIC) #0: Fri Mar 28 15:20:03 ART 2008
root@<:/u/system/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 3 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR
real mem = 1062670336 (1013MB)
avail mem = 1019904000 (972MB)
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 07/10/07, SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @
0xe4440 (35 entries)
bios0: vendor Intel Corp. version "PE94510M.86A.0050.2007.0710.1559"
date 07/10/2007
bios0: Intel Corporation D945GCPE
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown, estimated 0:00 hours
apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1
pcibios at bios0 function 0x1a not configured
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xae00!
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GP" rev 0x02: rng active,
800Kb/sec
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82945G Video" rev 0x02: aperture at
0x4000, size 0x1000
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
re0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Realtek 8101E" rev 0x01: RTL8101E
(0x3400), irq 11, address 00:1c:c0:0b:99:2e
rlphy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8201L 10/100 PHY, rev. 1
ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BA AGP" rev 0xe1
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 82801GB LPC" rev 0x01: PM disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 82801GB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA,
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives)
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GB SATA" rev 0x01: DMA,
channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0:
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 152627MB, 312581808 sectors
wd1 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 1:
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 152627MB, 312581808 sectors
wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
wd1(pciide1:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 "Intel 82801GB SMBus" rev 0x01: irq 10
iic0 at ichiic0
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0:
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
biomask f7fd netmask fffd ttymask
pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
Marcello Cruz escribis:
1) I updated the BIOS to NL94510J.86A.0033.2008.0807.1932. This is the
most recent BIOS available from Intel to this board. The old BIOS was
NL94510J.86A.0017.2007.0828.1137. Accordingly to the flash utility, I
cannot use a BIOS update with different prefix (NL94510J.86A).
2) Following another post I disabled APM. With version 4.3 (OpenBSD),
it worked, but the system become unstable and I lose connectivity with
remote SSH sessions. With version 4.4 (OpenBSD) the system hangs at
"mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR Support".
3) Then I tried to disable ACPI. With version 4.3 the system hangs at
"npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16".
With version 4.4 (OpenBSD) the system hangs when I activate the second
NIC (up, dhcp or IP address).
4) Then I installed version 4.4 on a different hardware with the 3 NIC
(3Com 3c905B 100Base-TX, DLink DFE-520TX, plus the on-board NIC with
Realket chipset). The system works with no problem. So, I realize the
problem is with the motherboard. But where?
5) A page
(http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-008326.htm)
from Intel say that there is support for Linux.
What does "RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80" mean? Any clues?
The best option is to ask the dealer to replace the board for another
wich supports Linux. Is that right? Or, is there another solution?
Rgds
Marcello
OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC) #1021: Tue Aug 12 17:16:55 MDT 2008
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80
cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 430 @ 1.80GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
1.80 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,TM2,CX16,xTPR
real mem = 1062412288 (1013MB)
avail mem = 1018851328 (971MB)
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80
mainbus0
Intel 5100AGN in 4.5?
I'm considering getting one of the new ruggedized Thinkpad or HP laptops, but it seems like they all come with an Intel 5100AGN. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=123606425822588&w=2 claims iwn(4) supports it "in -current" but I'm stupid with CVS and can't figure out when 4.4-CURRENT because 4.5-RELEASE. Can anyone tell me? Or better yet, tell me if there's a way to figure these things out in cvsweb? Thanks -Nick
Re: HP 2133
Just installed 2009-04-13 snap.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:33:08PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > I wonder in particular if there is support for
> > > the pc-card interface
> >
> > Haven't tried yet. I should have a Express Card with in the week that
> > I can test it with.
Works.
Tried a StarTech.com ExpressCard Gigabit Ethernet Adapter EC1000BT
et0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "AT&T/Lucent ET1310" rev 0x02: apic 2 int 4 (irq
10), address 00:13:3b:03:03:8a
etphy0 at et0 phy 0: ET1011 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 2
Awfully hot when it came out though.
> > > and the audio device?
> >
> > Nope. I've attached a dmesg from 4.4 I currently have installed.
>
> accrding to lspci output on linux found on the net, there's a vt1708
> hda (azalia) controller on pci bus 128, but the only mention of this
> bus in your dmesg is:
>
> acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 128 (PCI1)
>
> maybe try a more current -current?
No. dmesg included.
> > > Since it has VIA graphics, running X shouldn't be too much of
> > > an issue...
> >
> > Out of the box X starts, but the mouse pointer isn't visible.
> > I haven't even attempted to fix it.
> >
> > If you're really interested I'll install snap over the weekend
> > and get you the current state.
Haven't tried X yet.
--
OpenBSD 4.5-current (GENERIC) #48: Sun Apr 12 23:43:52 MDT 2009
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: VIA C7-M Processor 1200MHz ("CentaurHauls" 686-class) 1.20 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,SBF,SSE3,EST,TM2,xTPR
real mem = 1877241856 (1790MB)
avail mem = 1806376960 (1722MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 08/04/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0010, SMBIOS
rev. 2.5 @ 0xfc590 (19 entries)
bios0: vendor Hewlett-Packard version "68VGU Ver. F.04" date 08/04/2008
bios0: Hewlett-Packard HP 2133
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG SLIC WDRT OEMB HPET SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices BLAN(S5) SLPB(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: RNG AES AES-CTR SHA1 SHA256 RSA
cpu0: apic clock running at 199MHz
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 3, 24 pins
ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfecc, version 3, 24 pins
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P1)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (NBPG)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 0 (P0P9)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 7 (P0PA)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 5 (NBP0)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 128 (PCI1)
acpiec0 at acpi0
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2, PSS
acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 105 degC
acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online
acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT1 model "Primary" serial 10 type LiOn oem
"Hewlett-Packard"
acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_
acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB
acpibtn2 at acpi0: PWRB
acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xcc00 0xcd000/0x1600
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x0406060904000609
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1200 MHz (844 mV): speeds: 1200, 800 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
extent `pciio' (0x0 - 0x), flags=0
0xb800 - 0xb81f
0xb880 - 0xb89f
0xbc00 - 0xbc1f
0xc000 - 0xc0ff
0xc400 - 0xc40f
0xc480 - 0xc483
0xc800 - 0xc807
0xc880 - 0xc883
0xcc00 - 0xcc07
0xd000 - 0xefff
extent `pcimem' (0x0 - 0x), flags=0
0x1000 - 0x9
0xe - 0x6fef
0xc000 - 0xcfff
0xde00 - 0xdfff
0xf000 - 0xfaff
0xfbeffc00 - 0xfbeffcff
0xfbf0 - 0xfeaf
0xfec0 - 0xfec00fff
0xfecc - 0xfecc0fff
0xfee0 - 0xfee00fff
0xfff0 - 0x
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "VIA P4M900 Host" rev 0x00
viaagp0 at pchb0: v3
agp0 at viaagp0: aperture at 0xf000, size 0x1000
pchb1 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 "VIA P4M900 Host" rev 0x00
pchb2 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 "VIA P4M900 Host" rev 0x00
pchb3 at pci0 dev 0 function 3 "VIA P4M900 Host" rev 0x00
pchb4 at pci0 dev 0 function 4 "VIA P4M900 Host" rev 0x00
"VIA P4M900 IOAPIC" rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured
pchb5 at pci0 dev 0 function 6 "VIA P4M900 Security" rev 0x00
pchb6 at pci0 dev 0 function 7 "VIA P4M900 Host" rev 0x00
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "VIA VT8377 AGP" rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "VIA Chrome9 HC IGP" rev 0x01
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ppb1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "VIA P4M900 PCI-PCI" rev 0x80: apic 2 int 3 (irq
10)
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
"Broadcom BCM4312" rev 0x02 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 not configured
ppb2 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 "VIA P4M900 PCI-PCI" rev 0x80: apic 2 int 7 (irq
10)
pci3 at ppb2 bus 5
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "VIA VT8237S SATA" rev 0x00: DMA
pciide0: using apic 1 int 21 (irq 5) for native-PC
Re: Low power OpenBSD machine
Hi everyone, Thank you for all the suggestions; these have given me plenty of ideas to research. Cheers, Tim.
