Re: NS 6.2
The ftp server has directories for N6.2 that were created on October 24. No browser in the directories yet. ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/ Mustafa Hirji In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Link to the Release Notes. http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/ns62/relnotes/62.html Damien Damien Covey wrote: Netscape 6.2 Release Notes are out. I guess that much mean that the program itself will be relesed soon too then. I hope so, I'm looking forward to this release. Damien. -- --- Mustafa Hirji Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 5T8 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Having nightly trouble? Try deleting XUL.mfl
well, after all that trouble, the bug should be fixed by tommorrow's builds (if everything works as planned) Jay Garcia wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: Ben Ruppel wrote: It should be in your profile directory, where your bookmarks are. Try just searching for XUL without the mfl part. Also, check your preferencesdebugnetworkingdisable xul cache. I think this checkbox makes it so XUL.mfl isn't created any more, and you loose the speed benefits it has. Jay Garcia wrote: Roland Felnhofer wrote: Hi Jay, open a command window and enter: dir C:\XUL.mfl /s /a If you have other Drives in use rerun the above command with all the drives you can access from your PC ( dir D:\XUL.mfl /s /a ) if it's there you'll find it ;-) Cheers Roland Jay Garcia wrote: Ben Ruppel wrote: I'm pretty sure the XUL.mfl file is new to nightlies, so you might not have it. If you have it, it should be in your profile directory, where your user info is stored. On win98, that would be somewhere in c:\windows\Application Data\Mozilla\profiles\your profile directory or something like that. ahmetaa wrote: well. i cannot find that file. where is it? i use moz 0.9.5 Win98 Ben Ruppel wrote: Hi, ever since the october 24 catastrophe builds, it seems several bugs have been fixed, but these fixes are not showing up because old XUL.mfl files in user profile directories are not being automatically updated by mozilla with newer builds. I have seen A) middle click in message doesn't work and B) open tab in background doesn't work Fixed by deleting your XUL.mfl file. This file is regenerated when you start mozilla again. If you are having a similar regression, try deleting your XUL.mfl file and reporting the results here. Thanks, Ben There is no such file in my profile with this morning's nightly ... nowhere else either. It's not there. If it was anywhere on my system my Windows FIND/SEARCH function would find it. And it's attribute is not :s or :h for that matter. whisper its not there /whisper Just downloaded the later of today's builds and the file is now there. This is AFTER the bum regression in this morning's build.
Re: Java Plugin wont install on Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows 2000.
I have been able to work around the plugin copying procedure by adding this to my user.js file: user_pref(plugin.do_JRE_Plugin_Scan,true); you can create a user.js file in the same directory as your bookmarks and prefs.js. It is a plain text file. Matt Hyne wrote: I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows 2000 - but no luck. If I go to a site that requires Java it asks me to click on the Icon to install the plugin - I do this and it downloads and installs the plugin into windows - tells me that it is installing it in Mozilla but I just get asked to download the plugin again when I try to access the site again. Is this a known issue - can I install it manually ?? Matt
MSN Passport NS6.1 data security issues
Hi, If I try to modify my profile in Passport at this URL: https://register.passport.com/editprof.srf I get the following message: --- 8 -- Browser Not Supported Unfortunately, Microsoft® .NET Passport does not support the Web browsing software you are using. Please use supported browsing software such as Microsoft Internet Explorer version 4.0 or later, or Netscape Navigator versions 4.08-4.82. If you use Netscape Navigator 6.1: due to possible data security issues, you cannot currently access .NET Passport using Netscape Navigator 6.1. We take security seriously and are working with Netscape to resolve these issues as soon as possible so that .NET Passport can support Netscape Navigator 6.1. Until that time, please use supported browsing software. We apologize for this inconvenience and thank you for your patience. --- 8 -- What data security issues are there in NS6.1 that are not there in NS4.08-4.82(- HUH???)??? So this time it's not a standards compliance issue... A!!! Ranjit. -- Ranjit MathewE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member (Technical Staff),Phone: +91-80-209 75 11/12/13 Torry Harris Business Solutions, Fax:+91-80-226 84 42 Bangalore, INDIA.http://www.torryharris.com/
Re: Javascript configurationfile corrupt?
Erwin wrote: Hello, Everytime I start Communicator 4.6 I get an error that the javascript configuration-file is corrupt and asks me if I want to use the one of an older session. Then it works as normal. I have moved the prefs.js and liprefs.js files to see if netscape generates new ones, but I keep getting that error. Is there a way too solve this problem, or do I have to re-install netscape? Thanks, Erwin. Best answered in the proper group: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator Thanks -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
cool link
http://www.hot.ee/rixo/paradice/
Re: NS 6.2
Damien Covey wrote: Netscape 6.2 Release Notes are out. I guess that much mean that the program itself will be relesed soon too then. I hope so, I'm looking forward to this release. Damien. The 6.x group is: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.netscape6.windows -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: Fark: Photoshop This Picture
On or about Mon, 29 Oct 2001 23:37:43 -0500, Pratik [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: On 10/29/2001 10:57 PM, Mike Koenecke wrote: Interesting. You saw it correctly; the images do not show up on my machine. I'm on Windows 2000, and filed it as bug number 107489. By any chance is your image settings at accept images from originating server only Edit-Privacy Security-Images-Image Acceptance policy Make sure the setting is for accept all images. The images on the web page are not all on fark.com Pratik. Oh, for crying out loud. I'll just slink away now, with my tail between my legs. -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere to home
Re: MSN Passport NS6.1 data security issues
Ranjit Mathew wrote: What data security issues are there in NS6.1 that are not there in NS4.08-4.82(- HUH???)??? So this time it's not a standards compliance issue... A!!! Ranjit. Just more posturing. I find it hard to believe that Microsoft consider themselves as world leaders at security. JP -- JP White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NS 6.2
Binaries are up on the ftp site even though netscape.com web page doesn't say antything. Go get 'em! ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape6 Pratik. On 10/30/01 12:32 AM, Damien Covey wrote: Netscape 6.2 Release Notes are out. I guess that much mean that the program itself will be relesed soon too then. I hope so, I'm looking forward to this release. Damien.
Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
Its probably not advised to share profiles between Netscape and Mozilla but are there any issues that you guys know of when sharing profiles between NS 6.2 and Mozilla (recent nightlies). I know there were issues with 6.1 but how about 6.2? Pratik.
Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
Pratik wrote: Its probably not advised to share profiles between Netscape and Mozilla but are there any issues that you guys know of when sharing profiles between NS 6.2 and Mozilla (recent nightlies). I know there were issues with 6.1 but how about 6.2? Pratik. Same issues with 6.2 and previous versions. Themes configured in 6.x will usually not work in Mozilla and vice/versa. Also, if you configure reply at the bottom in one, it changes to TOP in the other when you restart. Other issues as well. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
On 10/30/01 02:02 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: Pratik wrote: Its probably not advised to share profiles between Netscape and Mozilla but are there any issues that you guys know of when sharing profiles between NS 6.2 and Mozilla (recent nightlies). I know there were issues with 6.1 but how about 6.2? Pratik. Same issues with 6.2 and previous versions. Themes configured in 6.x will usually not work in Mozilla and vice/versa. ok I can live with that. Also, if you configure reply at the bottom in one, it changes to TOP in the other when you restart. I dont understand this though. All pref changes in one are honoured by teh other but what is so special about reply at top pref and forward attachment pref both of which seem to revert back to default. Also, you might want to tell the netscape folks that the link to the linux broser is all wrong. netscape.com-New Download shows up Upgrade Now!* Netscape 6.2 English language, X11 Linux i686 And if I click on the Download button below, it gives me N6Setup.exe for win32. Also, for the curious (like me), I already tried the 6.2 spellchecker and it doesn't work so dont even bother installing. Pratik.
Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
Also, for the curious (like me), I already tried the 6.2 spellchecker and it doesn't work so dont even bother installing. Works excellent for me. And also, 6.2 seems very polished, but i might as well just throw it out because there's no tabs :-( Or wait a minute! does multizilla work? *checking* -- MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [icq#:123433 || ElaCin@EFNet ]
Re: msn , coincidence?
Albert wrote: ahmetaa wrote: According to news.com, posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but IE now. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd Look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97222. They're blocking Netscape 6.1 because of unspecified security flaws. They will let 6.1 see the MSN page however. And according to the CNET article, " "All of our development work for the new MSN.com is...W3C standard," Oh really? then why does the W3C validator throw up this for www.msn.com?: Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser. Fatal Error: no document type declaration; will parse without validation I could not parse this document, because it uses a public identifier that is not in my catalog. You should make the first line of your HTML document a DOCTYPE declaration, for example, for a typical HTML 4.01 document: said Bob Visse, the director of MSN marketing, referring to the World Wide Web Consortium, which is developing industry standards for Web technologies. "For browsers that we know don't support those standards or that we can't insure will get a great experience for the customer, we do serve up a page that suggests that they upgrade to an IE browser that does support the" standards So, by their logic, MSIE should be banned too, eh? Netscape 4.x would too, but Mozilla really shouldn't...
Re: Cookie woes
Dan Hartung wrote: I'm about ready to tear my hair out on this one. Since 0.9.3 I've had horrible trouble with cookies that just seem to disappear, or that aren't recognized by the website when I return (even when I spot-check cookies.txt in advance). It started with Blogger, and I reported a bug, but that eventually went away after removing all cookies at that domain. But now it's everywhere. Obviously it's very frustrating when every website I visit, from simple weblog/boards like Metafilter to e-commerce like Amazon, tell me I'm not logged in. Well, not *every*, just over the course of a few days almost every site will log me out at some point, no matter how long the cookie is set to last -- and most of them are supposedly permanent. (I'm reluctant to bugzilla this because I haven't had good luck identifying bugs; the Blogger one, which seems to be similar, is still in there but resolved now that I fixed it. The other one I reported turned out to be reported ages ago using entirely different keywords.) Am I alone here? 0.9.5 seemed to be much better the first few days, but as time goes on the same problem has manifested. The only saving grace is that the password manager *always* unfailingly remembers my info, so I can log back in, but it's still a damned nuisance. I've tried recreating the cookie file. I've migrated my profile. What else can I do? Or am I really not alone here? You're not alone. This happens every time I use Sourceforge, but doesn't happen when I use my.yahoo.com. I think it might be related to using https and cookies. It seemed to work fine with Netscape 6.1. My system is win2k, release version of 0.9.5 - whatever debugging I can do , let me know. Bill May
Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
Øyvind Berg wrote: Works excellent for me. And also, 6.2 seems very polished, but i might as well just throw it out because there's no tabs :-( Or wait a minute! does multizilla work? *checking* Nah, too bad. doesnt work :-/ -- MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [icq#:123433 || ElaCin@EFNet ]
Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
Pratik wrote: On 10/30/01 02:02 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: Also, if you configure reply at the bottom in one, it changes to TOP in the other when you restart. I dont understand this though. All pref changes in one are honoured by teh other but what is so special about reply at top pref and forward attachment pref both of which seem to revert back to default. The pref system does not save prefs when they match the default, so for every pref where Mozilla and N6 have different defaults your settings will only stick if they differ from *both* of them. Otherwise as you switch back and forth your setting eventually goes away and you get the default in each product. your choices are 1) live with it :-) 2) create user.js next to prefs.js and put the affected prefs there -- these will not be overridden or touched. But also any subsequent changes you make in the prefs dialog will only last for that session since the user.js setting will win at next start 3) remove the offending prefs from the *-ns.js default files. (don't remove all of them unless you know what you're doing) -Dan Veditz
Re: NS 6.2
Pratik wrote: Binaries are up on the ftp site even though netscape.com web page doesn't say antything. Go get 'em! ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape6 Pratik. On 10/30/01 12:32 AM, Damien Covey wrote: Netscape 6.2 Release Notes are out. I guess that much mean that the program itself will be relesed soon too then. I hope so, I'm looking forward to this release. Damien. Netcenter updated to reflect 6.2 now. -- Albert We must have a better word than 'prefabricated'. Why not 'ready-made'? --Winston Churchill If sending email, remove the obvious spam-preventer from my email address.
Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla
On 10/30/01 04:08 PM, Daniel Veditz wrote: Pratik wrote: On 10/30/01 02:02 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: Also, if you configure reply at the bottom in one, it changes to TOP in the other when you restart. I dont understand this though. All pref changes in one are honoured by teh other but what is so special about reply at top pref and forward attachment pref both of which seem to revert back to default. The pref system does not save prefs when they match the default, so for every pref where Mozilla and N6 have different defaults your settings will only stick if they differ from *both* of them. Otherwise as you switch back and forth your setting eventually goes away and you get the default in each product. Ok. That makes sense. your choices are 1) live with it :-) 2) create user.js next to prefs.js and put the affected prefs there -- these will not be overridden or touched. But also any subsequent changes you make in the prefs dialog will only last for that session since the user.js setting will win at next start Now why didnt I think of that? Great idea. I'll use user.js if I do major shuttling between 6.2 and Mozilla but since 6.2 doesn't have tabs and you can't change the order of columns in Mail/News, I think I'll just stick to the latest nightly (or 0.9.5 when things go bad) Thanks. Pratik.
Mail/newsgroup reader background colour hack
I would normally post this in the Netscape 6 newsgroup, but I'm looking for an internal adjustment to the UI to change the Netscape 6.2 mail manager background colour to an RGB hex code of my choice as I find the bright white far too harsh on the eyes. Could someone advise me how to set the background colour for the Netscape Messenger program windows? I find the bright white too bright. I have set the TEXT AND BACKGROUND colours so that it uses light grey and have checked the USE SYSTEM COLOURS option box in PREFERENCES. While this successfully changes the NS 6.2 Navigator program window to light grey, in NS 6.2 Messenger only the message display window is in light grey. The folder pane and the message header pane is still bright white. Can these be overriden for their background colour as well? I'm hoping some deep hack in the UI files for the browser skin can do the trick. The problem is, I don't know where to find the UI file that contains the colour code for the background colour in the mail manager. If there's another Mozilla newsgroup that would be more useful to post this message on, please advise. Thanks for any help. Ken
Re: NS 6.2
Jay Garcia wrote: Damien Covey wrote: Netscape 6.2 Release Notes are out. I guess that much mean that the program itself will be relesed soon too then. I hope so, I'm looking forward to this release. Damien. The 6.x group is: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.netscape6.windows You wrote that 'bout 5 hours ago, and I'm still getting a non-existent message... Do you want to unsubscribe?
Re: MSN Passport NS6.1 data security issues
Does Moz and N6 use SSL (Secure Sockets Layers) asCommunicator and IE do? Could this be the difference? (I am posing this as a question rather than stating in a sentence.) Garth Wallace wrote: JP White wrote: Ranjit Mathew wrote: What data security issues are there in NS6.1 that are not there in NS4.08-4.82(- HUH???)??? So this time it's not a standards compliance issue... A!!! Just more posturing. I find it hard to believe that Microsoft consider themselves as world leaders at security. I find it easy to believe that they *consider* themselves world leaders in security. Whether they actually *are* world leaders in security is highly doubtful however. -- --- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --- If it's fixed, don't break it! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm
Re: Info request
YOUR OWN INTERNET SPORTSBOOK CASINO STARTING @ $17,000!!! Now assembled and packaged we have the most cost effective turnkey program for you. A publicly traded company created the casino software, a billion dollar corporation¡¦ If you would like to view one of the casino sites, please contact one of our casino Agents. They will provide you with a demonstration casino site for you to view. For a free info package and CD ROM, please contact one of our casino Agents they will be more than happy to overnight you a package, and to answer any questions that you may have regarding ownership of your very own online sportsbook and casino operation. North American toll free# 1 888-633-2259 International# 1 604-688-2310 Respectfully, Michael Gidge
Re: NS 6.2
Nigel L wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: Damien Covey wrote: Netscape 6.2 Release Notes are out. I guess that much mean that the program itself will be relesed soon too then. I hope so, I'm looking forward to this release. Damien. The 6.x group is: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.netscape6.windows You wrote that 'bout 5 hours ago, and I'm still getting a non-existent message... Do you want to unsubscribe? Make sure your server settings in the preferences are set to port 563 and the SSL box is ticked. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Hiding my profiles from Netscape
Hi there, I have built a Mozilla browser on Win98 with its own custom buttons and toolbars. However, when I install Netscape 6, it loads with my custom settings. I have concluded this is because Netscape is reading the same Profiles folder (possibly the C:\Windows\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles) that my custom browser reads from/writes to. So my question is, if that is in fact the reason, how can I change my custom build so that settings will be stored in a place where Netscape will not try to read? I assume this means changing some constant named Mozilla to something more obscure. Would this work? Where could I do this? Thanks, Dave Alvarado
Re: MSN Passport NS6.1 data security issues
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 30 Oct 2001: Does Moz and N6 use SSL (Secure Sockets Layers) asCommunicator and IE do? Could this be the difference? (I am posing this as a question rather than stating in a sentence.) Yes, Mozilla uses SSL, as well as TLS for secure connections -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Thanks!
Erik Pukinskis wrote: I wasn't sure where to direct this, so I'll post it here: I just upgraded to WindowsXP/IE6 and whenever I try to watch the quicktime trailers on apple.com with IE, the damn thing crashes constantly. I finally got fed up and installed mozilla 0.9.5, and wonder of wonders, no more crashing! Thanks, moz! -Erik You're welcome !! :-D -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: MSN Passport NS6.1 data security issues
Garth Wallace wrote: JP White wrote: Ranjit Mathew wrote: What data security issues are there in NS6.1 that are not there in NS4.08-4.82(- HUH???)??? So this time it's not a standards compliance issue... A!!! Just more posturing. I find it hard to believe that Microsoft consider themselves as world leaders at security. I find it easy to believe that they *consider* themselves world leaders in security. Whether they actually *are* world leaders in security is highly doubtful however. Microsft/Security = Oxymoron Think raw_sockets .. :-D -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: Thanks!
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 30 Oct 2001: Erik Pukinskis wrote: I wasn't sure where to direct this, so I'll post it here: I just upgraded to WindowsXP/IE6 and whenever I try to watch the quicktime trailers on apple.com with IE, the damn thing crashes constantly. I finally got fed up and installed mozilla 0.9.5, and wonder of wonders, no more crashing! Thanks, moz! -Erik You're welcome !! :-D The sad thing is this: Mozilla is a completely beta program, with no guarentees what so ever that it will work/work as intended. People will bitch for *months* on end that they can't get something to work right (even when other people have never had a problem). IE6 is a finished product. It's designed to work with a good amount of reliability. It doesn't, it crashes, it takes your OS with it sometimes, yet no one says Forget this, I'm going to Netscape 6, but twice a week in these newsgroups people say Forget this, I'm going back to IE. Why is it more excusable for a finished product to be unstable but people complain that something unfinished doesn't work right occasionally? -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Hiding my profiles from Netscape
In truth, the Profile mechanism needs to be extended to isolate profiles created in different Mozilla derivatives from each other. This will prevent Mozilla and Netscape from using each other's profiles, also, which always causes trouble. In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mac Burner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I have built a Mozilla browser on Win98 with its own custom buttons and toolbars. However, when I install Netscape 6, it loads with my custom settings. I have concluded this is because Netscape is reading the same Profiles folder (possibly the C:\Windows\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles) that my custom browser reads from/writes to. So my question is, if that is in fact the reason, how can I change my custom build so that settings will be stored in a place where Netscape will not try to read? I assume this means changing some constant named Mozilla to something more obscure. Would this work? Where could I do this? Thanks, Dave Alvarado
Re: Mail/newsgroup reader background colour hack
Never mind my previous posting on this issue. I know now how to alter the colours to my requirements. Ken Ken wrote: I would normally post this in the Netscape 6 newsgroup, but I'm looking for an internal adjustment to the UI to change the Netscape 6.2 mail manager background colour to an RGB hex code of my choice as I find the bright white far too harsh on the eyes. Could someone advise me how to set the background colour for the Netscape Messenger program windows? I find the bright white too bright. I have set the TEXT AND BACKGROUND colours so that it uses light grey and have checked the USE SYSTEM COLOURS option box in PREFERENCES. While this successfully changes the NS 6.2 Navigator program window to light grey, in NS 6.2 Messenger only the message display window is in light grey. The folder pane and the message header pane is still bright white. Can these be overriden for their background colour as well? I'm hoping some deep hack in the UI files for the browser skin can do the trick. The problem is, I don't know where to find the UI file that contains the colour code for the background colour in the mail manager. If there's another Mozilla newsgroup that would be more useful to post this message on, please advise. Thanks for any help. Ken
Migrating from Windows to Linux
Does anybody know if there is a way to move NS 6.x profiles from Windows to NS 6.x on Linux? Thanks Mark Rakozy
Netscape 4.7 keeps taking over!
Since Mozilla (as of 0.95) still can't handle all of the web sites I throw at it, I keep Netscape 4.7 around as a secondary browser. Is there any way I can prevent Netscape from taking over as my primary browser? It doesn't come up with the Netscape is no longer the primary browser, do you wanna change that? type dialog that I often see on other computers with two browsers, and I don't see anything in the options (I'm probably just missing something). And if I tell Mozilla to keep itself as the main browser, it tosses its screwed up registry settings back in, which causes its own host of problems (see bug 89534). Whenever I load up Netscape, after that, if I click on a link in my email client (Eudora Pro), Netscape loads up. Only immediately after installing each version of Mozilla (before loading Netscape for the first time) does Eudora try to use Mozilla for its URL's. Am I simply missing an option somewhere in Netscape's settings? Thanks Erik Harris eharris1@rocheste$.$$.com http://w3.to/erikICQ: 2610172 Chinese Martial Arts Assoc @ Cornell: http://w3.to/CMAAC/ To avoid Spam-bots, my address at the top is INCORRECT. Change each dollar sign to an r.
Modify the width of vertical scrollbar for TestGtkEmbed?
For Netscape, we can configure Netscape*.vscroll.width: 10 in .Xdefault to setup the vertical scrollbar's width of Netscape Window. But this doesn't work for Mozilla. Does anybody have any idea for this option? I want a wider scrollbar. Dave
