Re: New Mozilla Logo
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001 06:25:44 -0500, kang wrote: Proposals for a New Mozilla Logo Go here to view and vote on Entries : http://pub51.ezboard.com/f9thamendmentdebatecommunityfrm1.showMessage?topicID=141.topic -= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =- hah hah aha lol
Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
Colin Thefleau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:9v0ock$5qo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I noticed that the website mozilla.org does not have a document type declaration. I thought this where a html or standart requirement. If someone (the webmaster) knows, let me know, just for curiosity. Ciao Colin http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89885 This bug really needs to get fixed. An organisation that creates a browser that claims the most standards compliance should have a home page that can be validated on w3.org. Whats the point of directly people who say This website doesn't display right in Mozilla to validator.w3.org when mozilla.org's own home page does not validate. Pratik.
Re: WTF! mozilla,
, but I fail to see why I should even consider the ghosts some excile Nepalese see, whos only contribution to this group or the project has been trolling. He isn't only seeing ghosts at broad dayligh - he's hallusinating. really depends on what you call trolling. if disagreeing with you is trolling, pls killfile me along with everone else who does not agreee with you. No one is forcing you to consider my opinon.. one of the nice things about freedom wouldnt you say. in addition, i am not alone in my opposition to the mozilla logo. i am just one who is saying what he thinks.. there are others posting heer who agree with me. seriously, i know that you cant please everyone .. everything will offend someone, but there are images that will blatantly offend a large segement of the population.. usually there are politically and ideologically divisive images, the confederate flag, Nazi swastika, hammer and sicke, star, american flag or any flag, etc. I just beleive that they shouldnt be used like that. it just goes to hurt the open source software ingenreal. I can just see MS using mozilla as an example.
Re: WTF! mozilla,
Chocobo_greens wrote: , but I fail to see why I should even consider the ghosts some excile Nepalese see, whos only contribution to this group or the project has been trolling. He isn't only seeing ghosts at broad dayligh - he's hallusinating. really depends on what you call trolling. if disagreeing with you is trolling, pls killfile me along with everone else who does not agreee with you. No one is forcing you to consider my opinon.. one of the nice things about freedom wouldnt you say. in addition, i am not alone in my opposition to the mozilla logo. i am just one who is saying what he thinks.. there are others posting heer who agree with me. seriously, i know that you cant please everyone .. everything will offend someone, but there are images that will blatantly offend a large segement of the population.. usually there are politically and ideologically divisive images, the confederate flag, Nazi swastika, hammer and sicke, star, american flag or any flag, etc. I just beleive that they shouldnt be used like that. it just goes to hurt the open source software ingenreal. I can just see MS using mozilla as an example. People need to realize that sometimes a star is just a star. If there is any sort of communist insinuation, it does have a correct basis, as open source software is very much a community effort - or communal, or communist... not in the sense of the former government of the USSR, China, or any other country that claims to be communist, it's a group of people working towards a common goal, to build the most kick-ass software in the world... by the people, for the people. Relating a style of art to a communist, facist, or dictatorial regime is childish, and closeminded - while the regime may favour the art style, the art style is not representative of the regime. The star has been a common symbol of greatness for a very, very long time - the fact that communist regimes adopted it to make themselves appear great doesn't make it a communist symbol. If it WAS a communist symbol, it wouldn't adorn the Hollywood walk of fame, billions of student essays and tests (every capitalist at one point fought to have a gold, silver, red, or green star on their school work) and millions of other articles as a symbol of excellence. Don't give the regimes you're fighting to avoid association with the power of association with such a wonderful symbol - take it for what is is, and teach people what it really stands for :) Patrick Patrick
Connection refused when displaying Ads
Mozilla works fine, but sometimes when I load a site with ad banners on it I get Conenction refused messages (when attempting to contact ads.[sitename]) For example Winamp.com or Deviantart.com I use Mozilla 0.9.6 and yes I have had Netscape 6.1 and 6.2 installed previously. I myself think this has to do with the Tweak-XP Ad-blocker which I have DISabeled now. Thanks, Marijn
Re: Recent Nightly destroyed my Bookmarks Separator Lines - Please Help
I demand that Peter Lairo may or may not have written... ...and this is what I see: I'm afraid that my sidebar looks similar to my bookmarks window.
Re: Win build question
D. Alvarado wrote: Hi, I am running on a Win2000 machine. Every time I try and build I fail with a 'cat' is not recognized as an internal or external symbol, command, or batch file error. I tried searching my system and I can't find a cat.exe or cat.bat program, which leads me to believe I have left something out of the build environment. Which part of the build installs a cat program and where may I find this mysterious cat.exe file? Thanks, Dave You need a set of UNIX compatibility tools. You can get an excellent free set at www.cygwin.com. - Chuck
Netscape 6.2.1
I was wondering if anyone knew what bug fixes/upgrades are in the Netscape 6.2.1 upgrade? Cyberweaver
[Q] Not loading web page
Before I fill out a bug report, I wanted to check here to see if this is a known issue or if there is some preference I have set incorrectly. I - 1. press Cmd-N to bring up a new browser window 2. press Cmd-. to stop the loading of my home page 3. press Cmd-L to begin typing in the name of the page I want to go to 4. after typing in the URL, press return Nothing happens. Netscape does not make any attempt to load the page. If I press Cmd-Shft-L to bring up the dialog to type in the page, everything works just fine. I do notice that once I being typing in the name of the page I want to go to, the little bookmark symbol off to the left becomes dim. Any ideas? (if there is a better newsgroup to post this to, I would be interested.)
Re: [Q] Not loading web page
Oh, I'm use Netscape 6.2 under MacOS 9.2.1.
Re: New Mozilla Logo
kang schrieb: Proposals for a New Mozilla Logo Go here to view and vote on Entries : http://pub51.ezboard.com/f9thamendmentdebatecommunityfrm1.showMessage?topicID=141.topic Aha. That's what they call black humour, isn't it? -- ,- -- -- - - - | Screwtape | Reply-To: is munged on Usenet | members.xoom.com/thristian |- --- -- - - - - | | My beverage utensil experiences a volume crisis. |
Re: WTF! mozilla,
JTK wrote: Adam Sjøgren wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 02:32:03 -0500, Chocobo greens wrote: that is very easy for you to say, for some of us, the red star, like mozilla's is still a symbol of death and destruction Sure, sure, you're entitled to that opinion. But what do you propose instead? Using enormous amounts of energy on ranting about what is, is far less constructive, for you, than to use energy on proposing viable alternatives. Come up with a set of graphics, that is *so much better* that everybody can't help to be convinced that it's a good idea to use them instead, then! That's been done many times by many people. You know as well as I that the powers that be will not have it, and are committed to the communist theme. Why? One word: Ch-Ch-Ch-China! Show us how much better you can make it, or how much better your ideas are. ...and AOL will ignore them. China? AOL??? What are you talking about? -- We're not all commie-bastards splash-screen edition: Adam Sjøgren http://www.koldfront.dk/misc/capizilla3.jpg[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now look, you've already done it for us! Pretty darn good, a hell of a lot better than the Purge staring you in the face.
Re: This site doesn't looks good in mozilla
Andreas J. wrote: Hi folks. i loaded this site in IE and in Mozilla http://www.sport1.de/coremedia/generator/www.sport1.de/Main.html in mozilla it is not displayed right is the site coded bad or is it mozilla's fault??? greetings, Andi Looks not so good here on build 2001120726 and same problem on konqueror. There is this green frame in the middle. Looks ok in Netscape 4.78. Actually it doesn't surprise me looking at the messy code that do not even has a document declaration. Colin
Crash when www. is missing?
Hi, Using Mozilla 0.9.6 Build 2001112012 under Linux. If I File... Open Web Location... and type a url without the www prefix the browser often crashes after Open. For example: www.cnn.com -- OK cnn.com -- crash Seems to work OK for some, though, e.g. xfree.org. Cheers, __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gunnm: Broken Angel http://reimeika.ca/
Re: news.mozilla.org Down?
I'm facing the same problem. I think its down. Using google groups until it comes back up. Pratik. Russell McGaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anybody know if the server is really down? I've been trying all day yesterday and this morning to connect and am not getting a response. (I use the news.mozilla.org server as my local server does not carry all the Moz groups, most notably .performance and .macosx). TIA Russell P.S. cc me direct with any answers if you would, so I won't miss the do to news server issues.
Site header scrolls in wrong direction
Can anyone find out why this site is displayed incorrectly via Mozilla 9.5 and above. The site head description scrolls down instead of accross. http://letitride.com/ R
Re: WTF! mozilla,
Adam Sjøgren wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 23:06:15 -0500, Chocobo greens wrote: when something like this is presented, you dont have to be a far-right hard-liner to see what it means... No. You have to be a far-right hard-liner _not_ to see what it means. Kind regards, does this mean it's a political statement to put a star at the top of a christmas tree? come on people - it's an artistic style, not a political statement. Patrick
Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
I noticed that the website mozilla.org does not have a document type declaration. I thought this where a html or standart requirement. If someone (the webmaster) knows, let me know, just for curiosity. Ciao Colin
New Mozilla Logo
Proposals for a New Mozilla Logo Go here to view and vote on Entries : http://pub51.ezboard.com/f9thamendmentdebatecommunityfrm1.showMessage?topicID=141.topic -= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-
Re: Netscape 6.2.1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cyberweaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if anyone knew what bug fixes/upgrades are in the Netscape 6.2.1 upgrade? http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=defaultmodule=allbranch=M OZILLA_0_9_4_BRANCHbranchtype=matchdir=file=filetype=matchwho=whoty pe=matchhours=2date=explicitmindate=10%2F19%2F2001+00%3A00%3A00maxdat e=11%2F26%2F2001+00%3A00%3A00cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hut.fi/u/hsivonen/
Re: W32/Badtrans@MM virus and Mozilla
This is still a bad idea for this to happen automatically. Yes, you have to run the attachment, but it shouldn't get that far. This has already been labeled as a bug 109249. Steve -- To reply by e-mail, remove ALL CAPS from my address...#$%!*!! spammers...
back forward button problems in unix:
on the latest builds dec 6-10 approximatly, the backward forward buttons never un-gray, and are non-functional on Linux Solaris-sparc. anybody got any ideas ? thanks robert somerville p. s. Please also respond to email address
Re: applications/x-shockwave-flash
David Loszewski wrote: so how do I install it on FreeBSD? I tried doing it through the ports and it said it couldn't find netscape and tried downloading the linux version from the flash.com site and wouldn't install because couldn't find my linux kernel because I'm running FreeBSD. Ideas? Dave I've never used FreeBSD, but on Windows renaming mozilla.exe to netscape.exe during installation circumvents a similar error message...
Bug 78509: can't make shortcuts with certain characters
Hello, I'm posting this about bug 78509 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78509 Essentially, this bug is for the fact that if you try to create a shortcut on your computer to web sites with :, /, or \ in their title, mozilla just shows an error message. For me, this is the biggest usability problem of mozilla. Yes it's a small deal, so I'm saying the rest of mozilla is really a great experience for my everyday browsing. This error, however, is the only reason I ever have to boot up internet explorer nowadays. I also think that an error such as this should be fixed before the mozilla 1.0 release, and as of now it has a 1.0.1 target milestone. I am writing this post to A)see if anyone else cares about this feature, and if so B)ask them to express their concern over the bug. So far I have posted several nag comments to the bug, and I really don't want to continue. The bug is assigned to pchen, and I know he's got a ton of other stuff assigned to him, so I don't want to draw more attention to this bug unless anyone else cares. Why should you care? Do you ever have to sort through and keep track of a ton of web pages, yet you don't want to bookmark each one? I personally have been using the shortcut dragging feature to keep track of dozens of pages covering job postings, bugzilla bugs, and apartment listings. If a certain site (www.homestore.com)includes a : in each of it's page titles, then I have to use internet explorer for all of my apartment searching and record keeping. As things stand, it'll be like this until after mozilla 1.0 is released, and I think that's just too long to wait.
Re: OT: Re: WTF! mozilla,
CaT wrote: Let's see if I can remember my american propaganda right... capitalism == freedom (to make what you want when you want how you want) capitalism == competition == many people making the one type of product differently Therefore to be anti capitalist is to be anti freedom and anti democracy. Hmm, how about I add another line in there. capitalism == living a good life (well, thats the idea anyway) Therefore, to be anti capitalist is to be against living a good life (or any other positive part of capitalism you can think of). Doesn't work so well any more, does it? ;););););););) (Do you think that is enough smilies?) Ian
Re: OT: Re: WTF! mozilla,
DeMoN LaG wrote: Chocobo_greens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in 9uubak$qu3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9uubak$qu3$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08 Dec 2001: There is no such thing. No matter what you pick, something will be offensive to some group of people. i agree but there is a diffecence between a red star and say an M logo. do you agree? I don't personally see anything wrong with the red star. The only reason it is a communist icon is because *YOU* see it as a communist icon. No, it's because the entire world's population sees it as a communist icon. If that's what you want to see it as, fine, change it. Tools are provided with your OS for changing the icon. What if I see the red star as being a space shuttle going to the moon? Then you're insane and need some heavy-duty medication. I can't believe you'd get offended over something as trivial as an icon. Like the man said, then let's change it to a couple of planes crashing into a couple of tall buildings. I mean, it's a trivial icon, right? Wrong. Not when it's outrageously offensive to the bulk of the world's population. But we gotta make that China sale, don't we? Taken from a website Computer Stupidies (http://www.rinkworks.com) * Tech Support: All right...now double-click on the File Manager icon. * Customer: That's why I hate this Windows -- because of the icons -- I'm a Protestant, and I don't believe in icons. * Tech Support: Well, that's just an industry term sir. I don't believe it was meant to -- * Customer: I don't care about any 'Industry Terms'. I don't believe in icons. * Tech Support: Well...why don't you click on the 'little picture' of a file cabinet...is 'little picture' ok? * Customer: [click] Do you see how stupid your argument is now? No. From http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/: It is a great moral failing of our age that the extent of Communism's atrocities remains dimly understood. The horrors of Nazism are well known. Yet who knows the Soviet Union murdered 30 million people? Who knows China's dictators have slaughtered an estimated 60 million? Who knows that the Communism plague has exacted a death toll surpassing that of all the wars of the 20th century combined? Not the Maozilla Politburo. Or do they simply not care?
Re: Mozilla logo
Mike Geiger wrote: If this is the case - where did the current artwork come from? And if people can write code that falls under the various licenses... why can't a few images icons? (This isn't a hostile question, I'd honestly like to know why this is such a big deal that doesn't apply to the code.) You can, but the trick here is that mozilla.org wants to both distribute their builds with the red Mozilla logo, _and_ still protect it as a trademark. Also - how do other open source projects to it? The Apache Feather? BSD Daemon.? No idea. -- jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ] email [ jesusx @ who.net ] tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ] warning [ I am an American. Of this, I am proud. ]
Re: OT: Re: WTF! mozilla,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:49:25PM -0600, JTK wrote: I don't personally see anything wrong with the red star. The only reason it is a communist icon is because *YOU* see it as a communist icon. No, it's because the entire world's population sees it as a communist icon. Stop spreading lies. It does not. (unless, ofcourse, you can actually prove that the entire worlds population, man, woman and child, do actually see it is a communist icon and, possibly have always done so) -- CaT- A high level of technology does not a civilisation make.
Re: WTF! mozilla,
Chocobo_greens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in 9v0pcn$rjp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9v0pcn$rjp$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09 Dec 2001: I just beleive that they shouldnt be used like that. it just goes to hurt the open source software ingenreal. I can just see MS using mozilla as an example. Sorry, but you are out of your mind here. If MS were to call another web browser communist because of it's icons, there would be such a huge backlash against them I think Linux and Mozilla would gain about 85 to 90% of the market within a few weeks. No company can make political, racial, ethnic, or any type of statement without killing themselves -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001: Five months an counting for a *one line patch*. Holy Christ. So fix it then. Duh. -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
pre-checkin tests.
As a friendly reminder test your stuff before you checkin. There's this page called tinderbox , perhaps you've seen it ;-), that has a box at the top called "checkin requirements," please go over those if you haven't in awhile. Take specific note of the pre-checkin tests that you're required to run before checking in. If you don't pass those tests before you checkin, you upset many people, and look odd for apparently not being able to follow rules everyone else is following. Also, if you're really whacking code, you might want to run the daily smoketests too. If you don't know what it feels like to checkin code w/ confidence that you're not going to regress the smoketests, try it, you'll like it. The daily smoketesters are not your personal testing partners, and tinderbox is not your build verification tool :-). Jud
Is this a known bug and if so, whats the bug ID?
If not, how do I go about adding it to bugzilla. The problem relates to TEXTAREAs If I paste some text, it sometimes doesnt show up properly. This also happens if I select then delete some text, it doesnt disappear properly Typing some new text makes the deleted text vanish or the pasted text appear. Another, possibly related bug is that if I click in a TEXTAREA where there isnt accually any text, it doesnt position the cursor properly, sometimes it selects text, scrolls the textarea or moves the cursor to a new location, sometimes it just doesnt move the cursor. I am using mozilla 0.9.6, if this has been fixed for 0.9.7 then thats really good...
Re: WTF! mozilla,
DeMoN LaG wrote: Chocobo_greens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in 9v0pcn$rjp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9v0pcn$rjp$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09 Dec 2001: I just beleive that they shouldnt be used like that. it just goes to hurt the open source software ingenreal. I can just see MS using mozilla as an example. Sorry, but you are out of your mind here. If MS were to call another web browser communist because of it's icons, there would be such a huge backlash against them I think Linux and Mozilla would gain about 85 to 90% of the market within a few weeks. No company can make political, racial, ethnic, or any type of statement without killing themselves Actually, I seem to recollect that MS has said that Open Source is a threat to capitalism or something along those lines... I believe Userfriendly used the statement in a gag too... Back to bugzilla for me... -- Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P 4th Age webmaster designer - www.4th-age.com Webprogrammer for hire :wq
Re: WTF! mozilla,
Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001: Actually, I seem to recollect that MS has said that Open Source is a threat to capitalism or something along those lines... I believe Userfriendly used the statement in a gag too... Back to bugzilla for me... They'd called open source a Virus. Calling something a virus, etc, is one thing. When you compare it to something that americans had the cold war over, you *really* risk setting off a major war. It would be no better than making a racial slur against something -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Hotmail attachment downloads? (Mozilla 0.95 problem)
On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:48:09 +0100, Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Harris wrote: Will Mozilla ever become functional enough that I won't have to keep Netscape 4 or IE lying around to use whenever I want to make sure I can actually do something on the web? :-( Mozilla is still beta, hence the 0 as major version number. I've been involved with plenty of projects that went on for years with 0.x versions simply so the development team could use this excuse, without any real intention of ever getting to 1.0. That's a copout. Erik Harris eharris1@rocheste$.$$.com http://w3.to/erikICQ: 2610172 Chinese Martial Arts Assoc @ Cornell: http://w3.to/CMAAC/ To avoid Spam-bots, my address at the top is INCORRECT. Change each dollar sign to an r.
Re: Copy/paste messed up? (Mozilla 0.95 and www.spamcop.net)
On 4 Dec 2001 03:19:57 GMT, Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And it came to pass that Erik Harris wrote: The procedure I follow, as recommended by SpamCop, is: 1) Copy/paste the header info from Eudora 2) Put a few carriage returns after the header (it always looks fine up to this point) 3) Hit View Source in Eudora 4) Copy/paste the source from my text editor to Mozilla. I don't use Eudora. Nor do I do any of this stuff - I simply forward it. Uhh.. That's not the point. Copy/paste is a Windows function, and works the same on all plain text, regardless of what program it comes from. The fact that I experience it most often with SpamCop is just an example pointing to a more extensive problem with the way Mozilla pastes text into text boxes. And when I use Pegasus, I just drag the message into my Anti- Spam, and it's all done automagically. Great, and how exactly does this have any relevance to this Mozilla bug? Erik Harris eharris1@rocheste$.$$.com http://w3.to/erikICQ: 2610172 Chinese Martial Arts Assoc @ Cornell: http://w3.to/CMAAC/ To avoid Spam-bots, my address at the top is INCORRECT. Change each dollar sign to an r.
Re: Hotmail attachment downloads? (Mozilla 0.95 problem)
Erik Harris wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:48:09 +0100, Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mozilla is still beta, hence the 0 as major version number. I've been involved with plenty of projects that went on for years with 0.x versions simply so the development team could use this excuse, without any real intention of ever getting to 1.0. That's a copout. The thing is that it has taken a while to write all the stuff that is needed. And to fix the bugs that pop up. 0.x isn't an excuse, it _is_ the beta. and 1.0 isn't too far off. And I think mozilla 0.x is tons better than IE anyways. used it since 0.6, and Netscape 4.x before that. -- Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P 4th Age webmaster designer - www.4th-age.com Webprogrammer for hire :wq
Re: news.mozilla.org Down?
Russell McGaha wrote: Anybody know if the server is really down? I've been trying all day yesterday and this morning to connect and am not getting a response. (I use the news.mozilla.org server as my local server does not carry all the Moz groups, most notably .performance and .macosx). It's up -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Tabs
What happened to the tabs feature, not enabled in latest nightlies. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: OT: Re: WTF! mozilla,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:14:49 -0500, CaT wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:49:25PM -0600, JTK wrote: I don't personally see anything wrong with the red star. The only reason it is a communist icon is because *YOU* see it as a communist icon. No, it's because the entire world's population sees it as a communist icon. Stop spreading lies. It does not. (unless, ofcourse, you can actually prove that the entire worlds population, man, woman and child, do actually see it is a communist icon and, possibly have always done so) maybe not everyone but MANY do. Far more than those who don't simply by the numbers , 1+ billion in china will 1+ in india will .. i am sure that hundreds of millions in the US do, along with hundreds of millions in europe+ russia.. Anyone old enough to remember 1989 will konw what the red star is. So you are in the minority when you say that the red star is not a communist icon.
Re: pre-checkin tests.
Chris McAfee wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">Part of moving forward on performance means "don't go backwards". IMO, sheriffs are well within their charter to close the tree if bloat/leak/perf numbers head south (yes, even just a little bit; unless we've consciously decided to take the hit in some tradeoff). Jud
Re: problem with Custom Keywords in 0.9.6
Tom Hatta wrote: I have a bookmark for http://www.everything2.com; with the keyword defined as e2. When I type e2 in the location bar, however, I get directed to http://www.e2.com;, a different site. I've also bookmarked http://www.google.com/search?q=%s; with keyword g (a custom keyword method as described in http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html;), and for a test, I typed g test in the location bar. The browser then tried to redirect me to http://www.g test.com/ which doesn't exist. (First of all, it has a space character in the address.) I've cleared the history of the location bar before attempting this. Also, both worked after I renamed e2 to nodes, and g to goo. My mozilla sometimes creates fake bookmarks that have identical names as bookmark folders, so maybe my bookmark settings file is corrupt? Or is this a known bug? Thanks in advance. Tom WFM on 12/08 on Windows 2000 and every build I have on my computer, but I do remember encountering problems on one build around the time of 0.9.6, but I have since deleted several of my older builds. Regardless it works now...
Re: OT: Re: WTF! mozilla,
Chocobo_greens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in 9v41im$9la$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9v41im$9la$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001: maybe not everyone but MANY do. Far more than those who don't simply by the numbers , 1+ billion in china will 1+ in india will .. i am sure that hundreds of millions in the US do, along with hundreds of millions in europe+ russia.. Well then, those billions of people you speak of should use Netscape, Galeon, or some Mozilla flavor with it's own set of icons. This thread is so frigging pointless I can't believe you've drug it on this far. This is just like the spell checker. If you want a spell checker, you use Netscape 6. If you want icons that don't offend you, either change the damned icon yourself (it's quite easy to right click on something), or use a packaged distrobution. The only reason I'm bothering to read this thread at this point is because of how funny it is. There are millions of people in the world right now starving to death, so I don't think it's fair Mozilla be able to render pictures of food. I want that stripped out right now. All those hundreds of millions of people who may be dead by tomorrow because they have no food to eat will be offended by pictures of food on the internet. And hell, how com Mozilla can render communist web sites? I demand a filter be implemented that scans all incoming HTML for communist content and gets rid of it. No stars, no text, nothing at all that can be considered communist in any way. Helpless people may stumble across communist web sites on the internet, and Mozilla should protect them from it. -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Tabs
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C158648.6040907 @JayGarcia.com, on 10 Dec 2001: What happened to the tabs feature, not enabled in latest nightlies. I have no problem with a build pulled about 4 hours ago. Tried a clean profile? I had that problem a few days ago (maybe 2 or 3). Next day's pull was fine though. Didn't see anything on the checkin page that would have indicated tabs breaking though, so I'm at a loss -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Mac vs. PC
JJKC wrote: It isn't dramatically slower. It's just that it is so much faster on the PC. For what it's worth, Mozilla on OS X crawls but so does IE. I really need to get a G4 :( -- . \|/ . (o o) +--ooO--(_)--Ooo--+ | There is no emotion, there is peace. There is no ignorance, | | there is knowledge. There is no passion, there is serenity. | | There is no death, there is the force.-- Jedi Code | +-+
[±¤°í]-19¼¼¹Ì¸¸ ÃâÀÔ±ÝÁö
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸ Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å, Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.Çã¶ô ¾øÀÌ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³» µå·Á ÁË¼Û ÇÏ¿À¸ç, Á¤ÁßÈ÷ ¾çÇØ ºÎŹ µå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ¿øÇÒ°æ¿ì ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ Ŭ¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä! ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ Ŭ¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä!
Re: mozilla.org releases Mozilla 0.9.6 [date correction]
Asa Dotzler wrote: On October 20, 2001 mozilla.org made available for download binaries of the Mozilla 0.9.6 Milestone. oops, that's actually supposed to read On _November_ 20, 2001 mozilla.org made --Asa
The Mozilla 0.9.7 Milestone freeze and branching plan
We freeze for the milestone Tuesday night at midnight (that's tomorrow!). The plan is to take fixes on the trunk Wednesday and Thursday and then branch on Friday. During the frozen trunk and branch period approval from [EMAIL PROTECTED] is required for checkin. To request approval for checkin email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a link to the bug, a quick description of the fix and the risk. If the bug is approved for landing on the frozen trunk or branch drivers will add the mozilla0.9.7+ keyword to the bug and send a reply mail. If a fix is not approved for the branch drivers will add the mozilla0.9.7- keyword and send a reply mail. After we've branched please add the fixed0.9.7 keyword to bugs where you have checked the fix into the branch. The normal Resolved Fixed field is used to mark the bug as fixed on the trunk and the keyword is used to mark the bug as fixed on the branch. QA will use this keyword as a signal that the bug needs to be verified on the branch and will add the verified0.9.7 keyword to bugs which have been verified on that branch. Also, drivers are maintaining a tracking bug http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113027 to collect bugs which we believe are important to 0.9.7. Please do not change any dependencies there. If you know of serious issues that should block the release of 0.9.7 send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *mozilla0.9.7+*: drivers approval for checkin to frozen trunk or branch *mozilla0.9.7-*: drivers rejection for checkin to frozen trunk or branch *fixed0.9.7*: developer uses this to mark a bug as fixed on the branch *verified0.9.7*: qa uses this to mark a bug as verified on the branch --Asa
