[Mpls] Reception/Demonstration of E-Deliberation Tools

2005-06-21 Thread Tim Erickson


This Thursday - June 23rd, E-Democracy.Org and Ciceron 
(http://www.ciceron.com) are welcoming national and international 
guests for a 2 day meeting on Deepening Online Deliberation, that 
is taking place in Minneapolis on Friday and Saturday.


This public reception is an opportunity to meet and mingle, with some 
of the leading experts in online citizen engagement, from the United 
States and Canada (and one from New Zealand). There will be a brief 
welcoming ceremony along with demonstrations of some of the newest 
online deliberation tools/games.


Please, come and help us welcome these folks who share our interest 
in the concept of E-Democracy and are leading the charge to increase 
citizen participation in decision making at all levels.



 Your Invited:


Deepening Online Deliberation
  Public Reception and Demonstration of Tools

 Thursday - June 23rd, 6:45 PM
Ciceron (http://www.ciceron.com)
126 North 3rd Street, Suite 309
Downtown Mpls
   MAP: http://www.ciceron.com/contact_map.asp

   RSVP = (Optional) To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Please, mention ODDC Reception

PARKING: We recommend parking in a public parking
ramp on 2nd Avenue North, between 3rd and 4th Streets.
This is only a short block from the reception.




See you there,


Tim Erickson
Hamline Midway
St. Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Campaigning in the Parks

2005-06-21 Thread Svattheriver
Dear Peter Ginder, Acting Deputy City Attorney
I am writing to you and to the Minneapolis Issues List Forum to ask for a  
legal opinion about the City's role in prosecuting candidates who campaign in  
Minneapolis Parks.
From what I have read, the City Attorney is responsible for prosecuting  
violations of  Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Ordinances.
I would like to campaign in the Parks as an individual running for  Park 
Commissioner. I would have a button or badge identifying who I am as a  
candidate 
and would hand out literature and/ or a business card with my contact  
information.
I have applied for a general permit to campaign in the Parks.
 
I have (nicely) asked a Park Police officer if he would  issue a citation to 
me for campaigning in the Park if I did so. I was informed  that he would not 
issue a citation for campaigning. He would ask me to stop  distributing 
literature. If I did not comply, I would be asked to leave the  Park. If I did 
not 
leave the Park, I would be arrested for  trespassing. 
 
To further complicate this issue, while the Park Board can make rules that  
are not ordinances, I can find no verification that the Board of Commissioners  
has authorized a no campaigning in the Parks rule.
 
There has been selective enforcement of this policy. I am told not to  
campaign in Parks while current Commissioners have done so and are allowed  to 
do 
so. 
 
I would like your legal opinion about this issue.
I will be campaigning in the Parks, which means this may require a court  
challenge. I will probably come before you on a trespassing charge.
 
From: the City Attorney web site:
 
The Civil Division of the Minneapolis City Attorney's Office  provides legal 
advice to the City's elected officials, the City's departments,  its 
independent boards such as the Minneapolis Public Library and the  Minneapolis 
Community Development Agency, and its commissions such as the  Charter 
Commission, 
Civil Service Commission and Ethical Practices Board. 
The Civil Division handles all litigation before federal and  state district 
and appellate (appeals) courts and administrative bodies,  including actions 
involving personal injury, civil rights violations,  constitutional issues, 
workers' compensation, personnel and labor relations  matters.
 
I would also note that part of the mission of the City Attorney's  office is 
to limit financial exposure for potential lawsuits and  litigation.
 
Thanks,
Scott Vreeland   Seward
Candidate for Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board District #  3
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re:[Mpls] Campaigning in the parks

2005-06-21 Thread Fredric Markus
Those park police are going to be busy this weekend! Loring Park will have
score of people wearing buttons, t-shirts, funny hats, and the like, waving
flags and offering campaign literature and persuasive campaign dialogues to
the masses that show up for the days of wine and roses.

At $35 for a permit to sit mute at a table and with a $150 damage deposit to
boot, looks like a real money-maker, doesn't it?

Now if only those naughty candidates and their marching millions would take
the park board staff seriously, assuming that the park commissioners would
somehow find a way to validate a murky bureaucratic rule that somehow
reminds me of Kafka.  

So if I'm just strolling in the park one day, in the merry, merry month of
May, with my partisan t-shirt du jour proclaiming my allegiance to someone's
candidacy, and I impulsively offer a piece of campaign literature to a
passer-by, what will become of me?

Does this escalate into a matter of Kevlar vests, pepper spray, water
cannon, rubber bullets, festive plexiglass shields on the horses of the
mounted patrol? They had these anti-riot accoutrements on the horses last
year when the Prez was preaching to the faithful at the St. Paul hockey
dome. Quite the fashion statement. Forget Easter bonnets and ice cream
socials. We're in a brave new world.

Is this what Commissioners Dziedzic, Fine, Hauser, Kummer, and Olson have in
mind? 

Fred Markus, Ward 6, Phillips West


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re:[Mpls] Campaigning in the parks

2005-06-21 Thread Randall G Cutting

Fred Markus wrote:
 Does this escalate into a matter of Kevlar vests, pepper spray, water
 cannon, rubber bullets, festive plexiglass shields on the horses of the
 mounted patrol? They had these anti-riot accoutrements on the horses last
 year when the Prez was preaching to the faithful at the St. Paul hockey
 dome. Quite the fashion statement. Forget Easter bonnets and ice cream
 socials. We're in a brave new world.

 Is this what Commissioners Dziedzic, Fine, Hauser, Kummer, and Olson have
 in mind?


Of course not, they'd rather you just say, thank you and go away.

Randall Cutting
Seward







REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Solidarity

2005-06-21 Thread Laura and lloyd


On Tuesday, June 21, 2005, at 12:16  AM, Dyna wrote:



	R.T.'s contingent was about half the size of Peter McLaughlin's and 
you were probably the only one of R.T.'s much vaunted endorsers to 
make the parade. Perhaps after Peter outpolled R.T. at the city 
convention those endorsers are making themselves scarce?


working for Peter McLaughlin and a better Minneapolis from Hawthorne,


You know, I just don't believe in spitting on the other side in these 
campaigns. I was not worried about the size of the contingent, the 
shape the signs were in or whether there were more t shirts or not. 
This campaign to me is about doing a good job in a very bad situation. 
R.T. has done that and he will continue to do it for as long as it 
takes to bring Minneapolis up to where it belongs. It does not take a 
math genius to tell us all we need long term solutions to long our term 
revenue issues. There is no quick fix for Minneapolis' ills. Some of it 
is of our own making, and a lot of it is due to the malevolence 
showered upon us by suburban and outstate legislators, and of course 
our maniacally ambitious governor.


I like Peter McLaughlin a lot and have worked with him since he first 
came to the Urban Coalition many years ago. I say hello to him every 
time I see him. I think mayoral campaigns benefit from debate and 
illustration of the issues. That's all fine.


But I don't like nasty signs stuck in car windows, bad language, bad 
treatment, and lots of anger. That does no one any good. While we are 
busy creating enemies out of friends and casting slurs across a 
one-inch gap of difference, the Republicans are happily making all of 
our lives miserable.


Best,

Laura



Laura Waterman Wittstock
Candidate for Minneapolis Library Board of Trustees
DFL and Labor endorsed
Minneapolis, MN
612-387-4915
www.laurawatermanwittstock.com
http://laurawatermanwittstock.blogspot.com/
Wittstock for Library Committee
913 19th Avenue SE, Mpls, 55414

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


RE: [Mpls] New Software for MPLS-ISSUES?

2005-06-21 Thread Steven Clift

On Behalf Of Tim Erickson
 Sent: 21 June 2005 00:38
 To: mpls@mnforum.org
 Subject: [Mpls] New Software for MPLS-ISSUES?
 
 
 E-Democracy.Org has begun to move our forums to a new software 
 package called Groupserver. The two new Local Issues Forums in the UK 
 both run on Groupserver, as does the St. Paul Issues Forum. We'd like 
 to see MPLS make the move someday as well.
 


This will be a big step forward for the Minneapolis list.  Take a look a
Brighton and St. Paul's messages - notice how posts with the same
subject line (yes, strategic posters will want to stop changing subject
lines for expressive purposes) neatly pack into digests by time:

http://forums.e-democracy.org/brighton-hove/groups/bh/messages
http://forums.e-democracy.org/stpaul/groups/stpaul-issues/messages

It also has an integrated member directory where you can opt-in to share
basic information about yourself that will be just one click away from a
URL inserted in each of your posts.

The big democratic problem I see with e-mail lists and web forums is
that conflict and difference is accentuated by the medium.  People tend
to reply first to what they disagree with an opinion and second, they
might correct or add additional information. The silent majority or
minority has no way of expressing me too support for a post without
cluttering our mailboxes. Measuring the silence is something those
deeply connected to local politics can do naturally, while those new to
the community might over estimate the level of conflict in the
community.

I don't have a technical answer, but perhaps you do?  Now that
E-Democracy.Org is investing in the open source GroupServer tool as a
solution, we can raise funds to have new features built that we need and
share them with others as well. So please come along to the meeting and
offer your input.

If you can't make it, here is a web movie tour of GroupServer:
http://e-democracy.org/groupserver


Cheers,
Steven Clift
E-Democracy.Org

P.S. The switch should happen at some point over the summer.

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] libraries

2005-06-21 Thread wmmarks
Today the New York Times reported on a study by the American Library 
Association that says there have been over 200 inquiries into patrons 
reading habits since 9/11. Considering that the Patriot Act does not 
allow a librarian to even mention that he/she has been asked about a 
patron's reading habits, this is a sad commentary on he damage wrecked 
by the Patriot Act on library users' freedom to read.


Considering the case of Mr. Masaoui, one wonders whether MPL librarians 
have been asked about patron's reading habits.


WizardMarks, Central
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] 100 years ago today Theodore Wirth arrived

2005-06-21 Thread JOAN BERTHIAUME
100 years ago today, Theodore Wirth arrived by train at the Milwaukee Road 
Depot and set foot on Minneapolis soil for the first time. 

 Charles Loring, on behalf of the Minneapolis Board of Park Commissioners was 
actively pursuing 42 year old Theodore Wirth, who had a stellar personal and 
professional reputation.  Wirth  had designed and implemented many projects 
with the famous Olmsted Bros Firm and had  personally earned  international 
acclaim  for his park design skills. In addition, Wirth  had an educational 
background and experience in the fields of horticulture, engineering and park 
administration

 From 1883 to that date the Board of Minneapolis Park Commissioners had  never 
had a staff Landscape Architect.  Charles Loring, represented  a committee 
appointed by the Minneapolis Board of Park Commissioners.  The Park Board 
invited Wirth to Minneapolis and offered  to pay Wirth's travel expenses so 
they could get his advice.   In reality they were trying to convince Wirth to 
become our second Superintendent of Minneapolis Parks.  

Once Wirth had seen the possibilities for design and development of parks in 
Minneapolis, he was unable to resist Commissioner Loring's offer.   Theodore 
Wirth described his feeling this way - 

...when I bade Mr. Loring goodbye at the Milwaukee Station, I had about 
decided to remain in Hartford. Then, during my long journey home, the 
possibilities for utilization and development of those many attractive features 
- the lakes, the river gorge, Minnehaha Creek, and the hilly wooded country to 
the west - lingered constantly before my eyes, and a desire to have a hand in 
their development steadily mounted as I neared home. 

The Board was to pay Wirth's travel expenses.  The expenses submitted by 
Theodore Wirth for the trip from June 21-26, 1905, totaled $90.  It was money 
well spent by the Minneapolis Board of Park Commissioners.  In return for the 
investment, Minneapolis became the beneficiary of the number one park system in 
America.   

There were some negotiations however.   Before Wirth resigned from his secure 
position as Superintendent of the Hartford Connecticut Parks, the Minneapolis 
Board of Park Commissioners agreed -

1)  Wirth needed a car and a driver to move him more efficiently around the 
city while he was designing and developing the park system.  .The Park  
Board agreed.  Minneapolis had accumulated 1,810 acres of park acquisitions 
since they were established in 1883, however, little development had occured.  

2) Wirth wanted to keep his devoted and efficient bookeeper, Christian A. 
Bossen. The Park Board agreed.   Wirth brought Chris along from Hartford.  
Chris Bossen got the Park Board's finances in order as Wirth's assistant and 
when Wirth became Superintendent Emeritus in 1935, Bossen became the third 
Superintendentr of Minneapolis Parks.

3) One of the most well known of the many negotians was that the Park 
Commissioners agreed to build Theodore Wirth a home and office  of his own 
design in a Minneapolis Park. (This was to replace the beautiful home that the 
City of Hartford had provided for him).   .. The Park  
Board agreed.  That home was built for Wirth in Lyndale Farmsted Park on the 
Corner of 40th and Bryant Avenue South. The historic Wirth Offices and Drafting 
Room in the House are the actual location where the entire Minneapolis Park 
System was designed or re-designed to the highest standards.  Wirth, with the 
support of  his board,  tripled the size of the park system.   This brought 
international acclaim to the Minneapolis Park System and by 1927 park planners 
from all over the world came to study the Minneapolis Parks.  

 Although the historic Wirth Home was actually (and still is) owned by the Park 
Board, Wirth continued living in his home until shortly before his death in 
1949.  At that point the home became an established  benefit as the  home for 
the succeeding Superintendents.  Charles Doell lived there and so did Howard 
Moore, Charlie Spears and Robert Rhue. Then David Fisher objected to living in 
a fish bowl  and abandoned the house in 1995.  The succeeding superintendents, 
Mary Merrill Anderson and Jon Gurban have not lived there.  

What is the highest and best use of a home with such a remarkable history?   
Through the efforts of the Minneapolis Parks Legacy Society the Theodore Wirth 
Home and Administration Building has been entered on the National Register of 
Historic Places.   The Legacy Society has developed a program similar to those 
currently  in place at the Stevens House and the Godfrey House.  The Legacy 
Society has asked the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board for an agreement 
similar to those at the Godfrey House and the Stevens House.

The Legacy Society's plan would open the historic Wirth Home as a service to 
the public at no cost to the Park Board.

A few travel expenses, a house in a park, a car and a driver in exchange for 
the 

[Mpls] Peebles supporters not keeping eyes on the prize, part 2 of 2

2005-06-21 Thread Socialist2001
Ron Edwards writes (long quote, ends just before Doug Mann responds),

As CM Natalie Johnson Lee said: 

Why did you hire her? They told me that they hired her, not only because she 
was qualified, [but because] she had a proven track record of what she could 
do and how she could deliver it. The challenge is now that she is rising to her 
qualifications and demonstrating that she could prove, what is the problem? 
Many of you know, when someone cannot get us any other way, it becomes, “The 
Attitude.” We have personality differences. 

Well, get over it. Our children need someone with her personality to move an 
agenda for them and you need to be clear that we are not taking this sitting 
down... 

This is not a joke, we are not playing. We are serious about the education of 
our children and we believe she is the one we need right now to move our 
children's agenda forward. 

If you're ready for a fight [Johnson warned the board] bring it on! 

Even Brandt admits that 

In her first year on the job, Peebles has alienated some parents, teachers 
and principals with what they describe as an intimidating topdown style. But 
she 
has also taken control of the worst scoring schools, and the first set of 
test results to be released for her watch showed marked improvement in 
basic-skills tests for eighth-graders. Brandt goes on to admit that Dr. 
Peebles’ “
reputation for turning around troubled schools, both in Cleveland and in New 
York 
City” is why “Board members said they chose her.” We must then conclude 
that 
they really didn't expect her to be successful. 

Doug Mann responds,

Here is the linchpin of Edwards' argument (The whole argument collapses 
without it): 

In her first year on the job, Peebles has alienated some parents, teachers 
and principals with what they describe as an intimidating top-down style. But 
she has also taken control of the worst scoring schools, and the first set of 
test results to be released for her watch showed marked improvement in 
basic-skills tests for eighth-graders...

In his initial article about the those test score results, Steve Brandt noted 
that test scores were up districtwide compared to last year, but the gains 
were substantially smaller than average in schools with below average test 
scores last year, i.e., the test score gap between high and low performing 
schools 
greatly increased. And test scores gains were, on average, smallest in schools 
directly under Peebles' special supervision. The black-white test score gap 
also widened.

The basic problem facing the Minneapolis Public Schools, in my opinion, is 
that a large majority of its students are not thriving academically. Large 
majorities of poor whites and people of color in Minneapolis do not have access 
to 
quality educational programs in the public schools. And it is not just the 
black community that has a stake in a fight to make a quality public education 
accessible to all on an equal basis.

And, in my opinion, the school board and community should focus their 
attention on the education access gap and how to close it. The district has a 
legal 
obligation to acknowledge and do something about the grossly unequal 
distribution of critical resources between schools with high and low 
concentrations of 
African American students.  

-Doug Mann, King Field
Candidate for 8th ward city council
http://educationright.com/blog
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Minneapolis Politics: Are they for real?

2005-06-21 Thread David Greene

Aaron Klemz wrote:


And lastly - what really gets me going is the insider
party activist banter that demonstrates what the real
problem is here. If the sum total of Minneapolis
politics is contained in your ability to woo 300-400
activists at the endorsing convention, and/or get
10-12 union and interest group endorsements then we
have truly become an oligarchy in function if not in
name. Before you get all democracy on me - let's be
clear. 90+% (and I would love to get the actual number
on this) of endorsed DFL candidates win. AND -
democracies function badly when become exclusively
personality driven. It leads to ridiculous outcomes
like no shirt, no parade contingent, no vote. And
while I don't believe that rationale drives most
activists, it seems to me like the distillation of our
current model of politics in Minneapolis rather than
an aberration.


So what, exactly, are _you_ going to do about it?  If you
don't like what's happening, what's preventing you from
changing it?

David Greene
The Wedge
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Predatory Lending - Taking a stand to end the practice in Mpls

2005-06-21 Thread Aaron Neumann

Jim Bernstein wrote:

High cost loans are not predatory loans; but, almost all predatory loans are high cost loans!  A high interest rate is usually not the main issue in predatory loans if the borrower if understands what that rate is when the loan documents are signed. What turns the interest rate alone into a predatory loan is when the borrower is told one rate and it turns out to be higher, or the borrower is assured that it will be within a range but that the loan will be at the low end of that range (it never is), or if the quoted rate is dependent upon other or variables or conditions which may be either onerous or impossible to meet.   

We did - and still do - need laws to outlaw predatory lending practices and schemes.  Minneapolis and St. Paul continue to be ground zero for predatory lending in Minnesota.  

AN:  Thank you all for contributing to the Predatory Lending 
discussion!  I have thoroughly enjoyed this thread and have learned much 
about the pros and cons of an anti-predatory lending ordnance.  It seems 
to me that fundamentally this issue is about personal responsibility and
mutual responsibility.  It is a valid argument that one should be able 
to make their own choices, even bad ones, when it comes to lending or 
anything else for that matter (personal responsibility).  It is also 
valid that we need for some checks and balances on institutions that may
take advantage of vulnerable groups (mutual responsibility). 

Home ownership is good for the economy, and more importantly, good for 
the overall livability of neighborhoods.  I believe that it is our aim 
and responsibility to further advance ownership for all people of 
Minneapolis, so that we create the most peaceful, just, and livable city 
possible.  An anti-predatory lending ordnance for Minneapolis will do 
just that.


Aaron Neumann
Candidate for Minneapolis City Council Ward 3 (Green)

Neighbors for Neumann
1828 Marshall St. NE #18
Minneapolis, MN 55418-4211
612.788.1284
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://VoteNeumann.org

Bridging Diverse Communities

Effective Government * Healthy Environment * Safe Communities * Arts 
Advocacy


Politics isn't about big money or power games; it's about the 
improvement of people's lives. - Paul Wellstone

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Peebles supporters not keeping eyes on the prize, part 1 of 2

2005-06-21 Thread Pamela Taylor


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
I must take issue with statements by Natalie Johnson Lee, Ron Edwards and 
others who are widely recognized as leaders of the black community in their 
response to latest controversy over Thandiwe Peebles performance as school 
superintendent. 

The district's best schools are heavily concentrated in the district's 
wealthiest and nearly all-white neighborhoods. For a majority of nonwhite and 
poor 
white students, the public school options have been narrowed to low and 
middle-tier public schools, dead-end curriculum tracks in some of the better 
public 
schools, and charter schools. 

Pamela Taylor says: 
 I don't believe the comment about where the 
best school's are located came as any surprise.  With that in mind, how many 
White parents from those neighborhoods have ever been seen protesting at the 
school board about lack of anything?  Minorities and poor white students have.  
My point is, WHY do we allow the wealthy neighborhoods to get the best of 
everything?  Why has the MPS allowed that? 

Doug Mann says:
Complaints about Peebles that are making the school board sit up and take 
notice appear to be coming from white parents in the Southeast quadrant of the 
city. That's where many of the city's middle and lower tier schools are 
located. 
That's where a majority of white students are not thriving academically in 
the public schools.

Look, my kids are in the Southwest area schools and Dr. Peebles has 
basically left these schools alone. So if parents like me were only looking out 
for 
our own kids, we would too shut-up and color. Why risk bringing on a round of 
retribution? But as a citizen, I want the whole district to succeed...


Pamela Taylor says: 
   Take the above statement made by Lynnell Mickelsen 
and mentally insert wealthy school parents.  Shutting up and coloring is 
exactly what those parents were doing when minority parents were saying what 
Lynnell is now.  Did anybody see the White parents protesting the School Board 
about any problems in the minority community?  Did they offer to give up any of 
their children's amenities?  

Doug Mann says:
I doubt that the school board and Peebles want to rile up the school 
community in SW Minneapolis. There is a lot of support for the status quo 
there, which is why the issue of closing the education access gap is not being 
addressed 
by the School Board, Thandiwe Peebles and her supporters, and the Star-Tribune.

Pamela Taylor says: 

So, it appears that you are saying that when poor Whites are having issues, the 
School Board must do something right away, which is to possibly consider firing 
Ms. Peebles.  So when did they become unimpressed with her skills and 
abilities, when that is the basis on which they hired her?  Who are they trying 
to placate now?  You say that Peebles doesn't want to rile up that community, 
but by concentrating on schools other than those in that SW community, she has. 
 Ms. Peebles doesn't have the problem; it is the School Board who appears to be 
in a quandry.  Is it possible that Ms. Peebles was getting to the worst schools 
first, and perhaps the extreme SW corner of Ward 13 that appears discontent was 
next on her list?  Minorities have waited for so long without seeing the 
wealthy White parents jumping up and down on their behalf to make things in the 
schools fair and equal, that I am failing to see the problem here.

Doug Mann says: 
  On the other hand, there is some support in SW 
Minneapolis for the kind of 
school reform agenda that I advocate. In the general election of 2002 the 
highest level of support for my candidacy was in ward 13 (the extreme SW corner 
of 
Minneapolis).

Pamela Taylor says: 
 
Until Whites and Minorities are joined together for the greater educational 
good of ALL CHILDREN, not too much is ever going to change.  And, until the 
citizens of Minneapolis are joined together in an honest effort to reform the 
practices of the School Board (i.e. vote some out, and change the 
mindset/policies, etc.), it will not matter who is superintendent, that person 
will be doomed before they start, and we will forever be paying out huge 
severance checks as they leave, with only a pittance left in the bank for 
education.

Yes, I believe their eyes are on the prize.  It is the opposition whose eyes 
have remained closed because they do not want to see what is coming at them.  


Pamela Taylor (Lyndale)







-
Yahoo! Sports
 Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at 

[Mpls] Get Out The Vote Community Festival

2005-06-21 Thread Pamela Taylor
List,
 
I am reading the letter addressed specificly to 8th Ward Candidates.  It lists 
three levels of paid sponsorship - Gold $1000, Silver $500, and Bronze $250.  
It specificly states that ones PAID sponsorship buys their way into the 
candidates forum.  This leads me to ASSUME that candidates who do not pay are 
not allowed to speak at this forum.  Now when I asked Councilman Lilligren 
about this some weeks ago, he stated that he was simply asking for sponsorship, 
and that they were only thinking about doing a forum.
 
Now I could read before I started to school, and my comprehension is pretty 
good too  (My mother taught a literacy program in the community), and my vision 
is nearly perfect, so I am quite confident in my abilities to know what I am 
looking at.  This letter is dated May 12, 2005.  It clearly states the fact 
that it COSTS to particpate in this forum.  It clearly states that there IS a 
forum, there is no just thinking about it at all.  So my gut feeling is that 
this is an underhanded tactic to exclude some campaigns.  I don't believe any 
of the candidates should pay a dime to speak at this public awareness event.  
Your letter states that this is supposed to be an integral step towards 
buildingand empowering those communities traditionally left out of the process. 
 Mr Lilligren, please CLARIFY.  
 
They also can buy time in front of the MTN camera which would constitute a paid 
commercial in my estimation.  I am not versed in the ways of public 
broadcasting, but is that not against the rules?  You are having KMOJ do 
periodic PSA's which is good.  But instead of simply letting them freely 
mention the various campaigns as a PSA curtesy to the community, those 5 minute 
slots are up for sale, too.  Now I can understand campaigns buying time 
themselves, but it seems as if you are working for the campaigns, too.  If your 
office is already paying for this event, why charge anyone an additional fee?  
Mr. Lilligren, please CLARIFY.
 
Also, the letter states that the food is free, the MTN coverage is supposed to 
be free.  You are putting out a call to talented youth in the area to perform.  
Is the entertainment free, or are you planning to pay them?  I know that 
sponsorships are nice, but if you did not get any, you already told us that 
your 8th ward office was paying for this.  Mr. Lilligren, please CLARIFY.
 
Now with the bruhaha about campaigning in the parks, the fact that you are 
selling signage and to the highest bidder on PARK LAND, it begs the question: 
Do you have the right PERMITS FOR THAT?  If not, you better start attempting to 
get them now.  We do not want to witness another unecessary misuse of our park 
police if it can be avoided.  Mr. Lilligren, please CLARIFY.
 
This being an election year, I want the budget for this event to be disclosed.  
I also want to know who/where the money collected from this event is going.  
The letter left that part out.  Since the candidates had to inform you of their 
intent to be a sponsor by June 1st, could you now supply us with a list of 
those Candidates who will be allowed to discuss the issues at the forum? 
 
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.  See you at the gathering!
 
Pamela Taylor (Lyndale)   



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] FW: cross-cultural connections

2005-06-21 Thread reginald birts


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Lowry Ave. road project hugely misguided in property acquisition process

2005-06-21 Thread PennBroKeith

With permission from Jamie LaVanier- Victim of City/County meddling with her 
8 unit building on 6th St. A very nice well managed building. The owner had 
even installed a video surveillance camera over the back yard. Now it is 
emptied 
boarded and trashed after the City/County emptied a building before they 
owned it. The victim was only a landlord. 

Keith Reitman NearNorth  The landlord next on the empty the property in 
advance of purchase hit list. FACT.


Subj:RE: Lowry Ave. road project hugely misguided in property acquisition 
process
Date:   6/21/05 2:06:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jamie La Vanier)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you Keith for being the voice in this.
My Lawyer said what the city/county did was illegal.
Just today I had to file a police report, because someone busted into my 
boarded up vacant building to break a window and take all the copper piping out 
of 
the interior and kick in all the doors.

All this because of what the city did.
I will be talking to J.P. from the Sentinel tomorrow morning, he wants to 
take my photo in front of my boarded up building.

I am at my wits end, and I think that is what the county is counting on.
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


RE: [Mpls] Lowry Ave. road project hugely misguided in propertyacquisition proce

2005-06-21 Thread Dennis Plante
Two questions for you Keith.  When did you purchase the next property on the 
hit list and were you aware that the city/county would be acquiring the 
property for the Lowry redevelopment when you did so?


dennis plante
lind-bohanon


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Peebles supporters not keeping eyes on the prize

2005-06-21 Thread Diane Wiley
In response to Pam Taylor's post:  What I don't get is what do people think
Dr. Peebles has done that's so great?  The schools under her direct
supervision did not do as well as the rest of the district -- so why do we
think that district employees should have to put up with her abrasive and
demoralizing style. What has she accomplished that's so wonderful?

I think it's great that the board stood up to her and did what they are
supposed to do --- supervise the superintendent.  I'm not saying she should
be fired, I'm saying she should be supervised by the board and not let run
amuck making people uncomfortable for nothing.  If the discomfort was
resulting in some great change and advancement, it might be worth it, and if
it was only discomfort, not bullying and demoralizing.   But there's lots
of work to be done in the schools and everyone has to pull together, not
apart.  Dr. Peebles is very smart, she's motivated and she clearly has the
ability to bring others in as a part of her vision -- if that's how she sees
her job.  Let's hope she does.  I don't know if the board talked to her
before her job review about the problems they were seeing and hearing
about -- if they didn't, that's a shame and they didn't do their job -- but
whether they did or didn't, the board needs to play more of a role, not
micromanaging, but making sure that the district is going in a direction
they agree with -- that's why we elected them.

Pamela and others who feel she's been mistreated by the board, I would like
to know what it is that Dr. Peeble's has done that somehow excuses how she
has treated people.

diane wiley tangletown who has had numerous issues with the minneapolis
public schools over systematic racism and lack of services


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Taxpayer's League: Light Rail has infected the Twin Cites....

2005-06-21 Thread Eva Young

They are really losing it on this issue.

Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis

X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via 68.142.207.145; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 
15:36:31 -0700

X-Originating-IP: [198.161.90.3]
Authentication-Results: mta338.mail.scd.yahoo.com
  from=taxpayersleague.org; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Subject: Event ALERT!
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:23:09 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Event ALERT!
Thread-Index: AcV2p2wwgFaOQwCxT8SQSGZ5w198uA==
From: Taxpayers League of MN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Taxpayers League of Minnesota Event ALERT!

June 21, 2005


Volunteers needed for the '2005 Preserving the American Dream Conference' 
June 24-26th


Light rail has already infected the Twin Cities, but find out how you can 
help other areas fight this disease


Interested in helping staff an event dedicated to protecting freedom, 
mobility, affordable housing and exposing the fallacies of smart growth? 
Then this is the event for you.


The http://americandreamcoalition.org/pad05.htmlAmerican Dream 
Conference is being held at the Holiday Inn Select in Bloomington and more 
information on how you can help can be found by contacting the head of the 
American Dream Coalition, Randal O'Toole at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]


The Preserving the http://americandreamcoalition.org/pad05.htmlAmerican 
Dream Conference is a great opportunity to hear from local and national 
transportation experts and learn about light rail, smart growth and the 
rest of social engineering's twisted lexicon.


If you would like your name removed from our e-mail list, please reply 
with unsubscribe in the subject line to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]




Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com

You do not have the right to never be offended.  This country is based on 
freedom, and that means freedom for everyone - not just you!  You may leave 
the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc., but the
world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.  --Article II of the 
Bill of Non-Rights. 



REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Lowry Ave. road project hugely misguided in propertyacquisition pr...

2005-06-21 Thread PennBroKeith
Keith says:

Thanks for asking. I Closed: 5/2004. Also, I was well aware the Lowry 
Corridor Project was pending. Initially they presented us stakeholders on the 
other 
side of the street (North) a plan to demo our buildings down, The seller was 
also well aware; but time passed and he doubted a quick outcome, or any outcome 
with the project. He was sick of the downward spiral at the site, had an older 
appraisal of the site for twice what he sold it for, and bet on me enough to 
turn over the reins of the property on a contract. 

It was overrun with criminals and trespassers. The day of closing I had an 
armed security officer serve each occupant a notice. Short and sweet; it 
said: 
I am Keith Reitman the new owner of the building. This is your 30 day notice 
to vacate. There has been an armed security presence on site almost every 
day since then. I also executed a pending eviction court writ from the previous 
mismanagement. It took me about two months before I was able to gain access 
to, and even SEE all the units I was responsible for managing and keeping 
clean, 
and safe.

I have been across the street from the property for about 8 years. I would 
routinely curse it every day for the trouble magnet it was up until I took 
over. 
Literally.

Dennis, the building was for sale for a year before I bought it. I acted to 
make the corner clean and safe, along with superb cooperation from like minded 
neighborhood stakeholders like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jamie L.), 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kdang Lor), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Roggenbauer, Spartan 
Protection), 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ku Khang), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Todd Williams), Sector 
Lieut. Lund, and many others. Together, we made the MDC (Most Dangerous 
Corner) 
a safer and cleaner place. We got busy and WE succeeded. Come on over sometime 
and I'll show ya' around my corner.

Now, would you explain why bad policy by the City/County in eminent domain 
mismanagement should cause you to question my reasonable and positive actions. 
I 
am the owner of the property; I bought it, I risked my neck, I spent a 
fortune on repairs, improvements and maintenance. I am here; see.

By the way, I had been in business on Lowry for seven years, on May 2004, 
when I bought the site. Among other reasons I bought the site is I needed it's 
parking amenity for my Bar/diner setup and apartments, across the street, which 
have NO parking amenity. Further by the way, although I garnered much thanx 
from local family business owners for taking a stand WITH THEM for a clean and 
safe Lowry.  I never heard an atta boy from you or your buddies. But it is 
still not to late. I am still here, every day, to make it better, God willing. 
Didn't you go over the river for what you explained as economic reasons, here, 
on The List. I stayed for economic reasons; 24 years so far. 

Again to the City/County:If you wanta' buy my property; OK. Don't meddle with 
my tenants till you own my property.

Any more questions Dennis, just ask.

Keith Reitman   NearNorth




In a message dated 6/21/05 7:38:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Two questions for you Keith.  When did you purchase the next property on 
the 
 hit list and were you aware that the city/county would be acquiring the 
 property for the Lowry redevelopment when you did so?
 
 dennis plante
 lind-bohanon
  
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Taxpayer's League: Light Rail has infected the Twin Cites....

2005-06-21 Thread Dann Dobson
So in the year 2045, when gasoline reaches the current
equivalent of $5.00 to $10.00 a gallon and our supply
of fossil fuels are just about depleted, how does the
Taxpayers League propose getting all their members
from their homes in Eden Prairie and Maple Grove to
work?

Oh, dumb me. Teleportation will be common by then and
we won't need cars.

Dann Dobson
Saint Paul

--- Eva Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 They are really losing it on this issue.
 
 Eva Young
 Near North
 Minneapolis
 
 X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
 68.142.207.145; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 
 15:36:31 -0700
 X-Originating-IP: [198.161.90.3]
 Authentication-Results: mta338.mail.scd.yahoo.com
from=taxpayersleague.org; domainkeys=neutral (no
 sig)
 Subject: Event ALERT!
 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:23:09 -0500
 X-MS-Has-Attach:
 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
 Thread-Topic: Event ALERT!
 Thread-Index: AcV2p2wwgFaOQwCxT8SQSGZ5w198uA==
 From: Taxpayers League of MN
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Taxpayers League of Minnesota Event ALERT!
 
 June 21, 2005
  
 
 Volunteers needed for the '2005 Preserving the
 American Dream Conference' 
 June 24-26th
 
 Light rail has already infected the Twin Cities,
 but find out how you can 
 help other areas fight this disease
 
 Interested in helping staff an event dedicated to
 protecting freedom, 
 mobility, affordable housing and exposing the
 fallacies of smart growth? 
 Then this is the event for you.
 
 The

http://americandreamcoalition.org/pad05.htmlAmerican
 Dream 
 Conference is being held at the Holiday Inn Select
 in Bloomington and more 
 information on how you can help can be found by
 contacting the head of the 
 American Dream Coalition, Randal O'Toole at
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 The Preserving the

http://americandreamcoalition.org/pad05.htmlAmerican
 
 Dream Conference is a great opportunity to hear
 from local and national 
 transportation experts and learn about light rail,
 smart growth and the 
 rest of social engineering's twisted lexicon.
 
 If you would like your name removed from our e-mail
 list, please reply 
 with unsubscribe in the subject line to 

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Eva Young
 Near North
 Minneapolis
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lloydletta.blogspot.com
 
 You do not have the right to never be offended. 
 This country is based on 
 freedom, and that means freedom for everyone - not
 just you!  You may leave 
 the room, turn the channel, express a different
 opinion, etc., but the
 world is full of idiots, and probably always will
 be.  --Article II of the 
 Bill of Non-Rights. 
 
 
 REMINDERS:
 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at
 http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a
 member is in violation, contact the list manager at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
 
 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
 
 For state and national discussions see:
 http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
 For external forums, see:
 http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
 
 
 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused
 Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
 Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
 Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at:
 http://e-democracy.org/mpls
 



__ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Get Out The Vote Community Festival

2005-06-21 Thread Robert Lilligren
The Festival is now in its fourth year. It is an event that I originated,
with a lot of help from the community, as a response to the low level of
political involvement (as evidenced by the low voter turnout) in this part
of the ward.

While campaigning in 2001 I committed to working to educate people about the
importance of political involvement. Using my office to organize this
festival is one way I've tried to deliver on this commitment. Others are;
participating in political caucus trainings (both partisan and non),
visiting schools (both in the ward and citywide) to discuss government and
politics with students, and participating in voter registration and GOTV
efforts in low voter areas. My credo is, those who participate in their
government find their needs best met.

There is a focus on youth involvement and attendance at the Festival. The
strategy here is to expose young people to political discourse and to build
an expectation  in these youth that politicians will pay attention to them
and their communities.

Pam Taylor writes:
If your office is already paying for this event, why charge anyone an
additional fee?

RL:
My office budget (which is no great shakes) contributes to the costs of the
event, but as I explained in an earlier post to this list it does not cover
the entire budget. We seek sponsorships from a number of sources. We have
corporate sponsors like Allina and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Individuals
contribute, too. Many festivals and events seek contributions and sponsors
to cover costs (like MayDay and GLBT Pride). Also, many charge campaigns for
space in parades and/or parks (like MayDay and GLBT Pride).

Different levels of sponsorship bring different levels of benefit. I will
ask my Assistant, Tiffany Green (now in her third year of doing an excellent
job coordinating this event) to post to this list the schedule of
sponsorships.

PT:
This being an election year, I want the budget for this event to be
disclosed.

RL:
No sweat. I will ask Ms. Green to post the budget to this list. Three of the
four years of the festival have been election years.

PT:
This leads me to ASSUME that candidates who do not pay are not allowed to
speak at this forum

RL:
As in years past, any candidate for any office from any party that attends
is given mic time.

PT:
Now with the bruhaha about campaigning in the parks...Do you have the right
PERMITS FOR THAT?

RL:
Park staff have been involved in planning since the beginning. I expect them
to inform us if we are out of compliance. This year does seem to have a new
dynamic regarding campaigning in Minneapolis parks.

As Fred Markus posted on this list recently re. this weekend's Pride
festival:

Loring Park will have score of people wearing buttons, t-shirts, funny
hats, and the like,waving flags and offering campaign literature and
persuasive campaign dialogues to the masses...Does this escalate into a
matter of Kevlar vests, pepper spray, water cannon, rubber bullets, festive
plexiglass shields on the horses of the mounted patrol?

Let's hope not.

PT:
Mr Lilligren, please CLARIFY

RL:
I hope I have. The Festival will be Saturday, July 30 from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
in Green Central Park at 34th St. and 4th Ave.

PT:
See you at the gathering!

RL:
I couldn't have said it better myself!

Yours,
Robert Lilligren
Council Member Ward 8
Candidate Ward 6
Phillips West


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls