Re: Orbix and MQ Series
Tom, 2035 is usually an authorisations/access problem. We use our application with Orbix 3.3 and MQ5.1 on Solaris 8. Our application is started by a defined UNIX user e.g. XXX which is a member of the UNIX group XXX. We use the setmqaut commands to give the UNIX group of which the user is a member the authorisations for the queue manager and queues the application uses e.g. setmqaut -m XXXQM -t qmgr -g XXX +all setmqaut -m XXXQM -n XXX.QUEUE.IN -t queue -g XXX +all setmqaut -m XXXQM -n XXX.QUEUE.OUT -t queue -g XXX +all Hope this is of some help to you, let me know how you get on. Regards, Jonathan. -Original Message- From: Tom Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 September 2002 18:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Orbix and MQ Series Is anybody using Orbix with MQ? One of my applications is and we've had some grief with upgrading on HP 11.0 from 5.1 to 5.2. They seem to be having a problem in MQCONN and getting a 2035. I'm wondering if there are specific ways that Orbix applciations that use MQ need to be built and perhaps some loopholes have been closed. Not getting very far on this one. All help appreciated. Tom This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk http://www.star.net.uk This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: MQ Series OS/390
Straight from the horses mouth - this answer from one of my colleagues who wrote index support. - What is the overhead of an index. Answer: At QMGR restart, each message on each indexed queue must be examined to rebuild its index entry. There is an option on the CSQ6SYSP macro in zparms(QINDXBLD) (on V5.3) which controls if the QMGR will wait until all indices have been rebuilt before applications can connect to it, or not. Other than that overhead, it is much faster to find a message using the index, rather than 'trawling' through the queue, looking for your target message. So there is a cost at restart, and a benefit at MQGET time. - Where is this overhead. Answer: see Q1 - Where is the index stored physically, which pageset. Answer: The index is built and maintained in virtual storage in the queue managers address space. It is built on restart, and freed at shutdown. We can see no benefit in hardening the index into a pageset. - Any do's and don'ts regarding to queue's with indexes? Answer: Use as broad a mix of MessageIds as possible. The fewest repetitions of the same MessageId gives the best results. Having all messages with the same MessageId will produce the worst result, and will be worse than having no index at all! Cheers Morag Morag Hughson WebSphere MQ for z/OS Development Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Forwarded by Morag Hughson/UK/IBM on 17/09/2002 10:33 - Douwe van Sluis, Infodemic B.V. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] d.b.van.sluis@INcc: FODEMIC.NL Subject: MQ Series OS/390 Sent by: MQSeries List MQSERIES@AKH-WIE N.AC.AT 16/09/2002 12:52 Please respond to MQSeries List We are using MQ Series on OS/390, persistent queue, messagesize avg 100k and we need an index on the queue on MessageId. This can be set up, no problem, but: - What is the overhead of an index. - Where is this overhead. - Where is the index stored physically, which pageset. - Any do's and don'ts regarding to queue's with indexes? Vriendelijke groet, Douwe van Sluis, Infodemic B.V. IT-Specialist www.infodemic.nl Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster
Hello Group, yes, messages will sit in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. There is no different behavior with message persistence. If messages are non persistence, they will be purged during queuemanager restart, no matter wheter they are in a qlocal, xmitq or cluster-xmitq. But you should be aware of the cluster-rerouting mechanism: If there are messages on the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE and they are not indoubt, then - at every retry interval of the channel - the messages are get and put again by the cluster rerouting mechanism. This is done because the assigned destination may be not available (thats why its in retry), and the put will select an alternate available destination queue if there is one. This is done with syncpoint control, so it will use a lot of logging depending on the amout of messages and your cluster channel retry interval. We once filled up many cartridges with archive logs (during some days / weeks) because a testsystem was not available for a long period of time and there where some thousands of messages in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. I do not know if this rerouting mechanism is included in all MQ versions that support clustering, at least its in 5.2 on OS/390. Regards Stefan -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 01:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster I would assume that the message will remain on the cluster transmission queue until QM1 is back up running. There might be a difference in behavior depending on whether the log messages are persistent or not, but I'll leave that for somebody who has more real life experience with clustering than I have. Stefan From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:34:09 -0400 You are correct Stefan. (long day) I will need a XMIT queue, a remote queue def and a Channel between QM2 and QM3, just like between QM1 and QM3. Next question that I need verification on is as follows: Lets say I create a clustered local queue on QM1 called LOGQUEUE. For the sake of discussion, we are only concerned with putting to this queue. We want to insure that messages get there, because once a week we run a batch job to look at that queue. When QM1 and QM2 are both up, an app on QM2 can put to LOGQUEUE and the messages will end up on the local instance of LOGQUEUE on QM1, because LOGQUEUE is advertised to the cluster. IF QM1 goes down, an app on QM2 that puts to LOGQUEUE will have what happen? I assume the put will fail, right? And if so, I really should create a LOGQUEUE on both QM1 and QM2. Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 -Original Message- From: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Peter, this sounds more like a channel question than a QR def question. If you only have a channel from QM1 to QM3 and QM1 goes down, messages can't travel to QM3 unless you also have a channel from QM2 to QM3. Correct or am I missing the point? Cheers, Stefan From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:20:35 -0400 Maybe an obvious question... QM1 and QM2 are both full repositories of ClusterA. QM3 is not part of the cluster. QM1 has a remote queue def to QueueC on QM3. The remote queue def is a clustered queue in ClusterA. An app on either QM1 or QM2 can now put to QueueC. What if QM1 goes down? Is the app on QM2 now not able to get a message to QueueC? Do I need to make the remote queue def on both QM1 and QM2? Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive This communication,
Re: One ore more initiation queue?
Joakim This is going to be driven by your design. If you are not triggering applications in the background, then you may run into issues that Jonas referred to in his note. However for many simply defining the process definitions to start separate processes is enough to resolve this issue for those platforms with trigger monitors that by default start applications on the same process. If your talking about using trigger every (not recommended by many) then that could be a lot of trigger messages and that may effect your decision to use a separate init queue and trigger monitor for this queue. Often other design considerations will require using additional trigger monitors and therefore additional initiation queues. For example if we are talking about CICS regions and the CICS trigger monitor, each region will have its own trigger monitor / init queue even though they may share the same queue manager. Or you may choose to use a client trigger monitor to start servicing applications on a machine other that the queue manager, in which case you'll need an init queue for this trigger monitor. So some of the key design issues you will deal with are 1) how many different places are you starting applications, 2) do any of your trigger monitors execute applications on a single process, 3) what type of triggering are you using and can the trigger monitor handle the load of trigger messages if one of the queues is trigger every. There may be many more considerations that effect your decision. Typically our trigger monitors are idle much of the time. With trigger monitors that start background tasks and trigger first designs with reasonable wait intervals and controls, we have no problem sharing a single trigger monitor and its init queue for any queues that are to trigger applications at a given destination. So in my experience it is often driven by whether we already have a trigger monitor running on that platform connected to the desired queue manager. If not set up a new trigger monitor and create an init queue for that trigger monitor. Rick |-+--- | | Joakim Andersson| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | | | Sent by: MQSeries List | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | | | | | | | | | Tuesday September 17, 2002 03:54 AM | | | Please respond to MQSeries List | | | | |-+--- | | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: One ore more initiation queue? | | Hi, I wonder when it's time to use several initiation queue fore triggering. In the manual I only found; If triggers are active, at least one initiation queue must be defined for each queue manager. Today we have in our system three init-queues, but nobody can tell me why. Is there any recomendation when to use more that one init queue? Med vänlig hälsning Joakim Andersson SDC ek förTele : 060-16 87 91 SDC IT, Drift och TeknikMobil: 070-598 87 91 Skepparplatsen 1Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 851 83 SundsvallWebb : http://www.sdc.se/ Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster
Stefan, Thanks you for all your useful information. I have one question needs to ask you. What is the purpose of defining a remote queue with cluster attribute ? Defining a local queue of cluster have advantage of having multiple MQ's shares a cluster queue and does workload balance. But I don't see any reason to have remote defining as cluster. Thanks David --- Raabe, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Group, yes, messages will sit in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. There is no different behavior with message persistence. If messages are non persistence, they will be purged during queuemanager restart, no matter wheter they are in a qlocal, xmitq or cluster-xmitq. But you should be aware of the cluster-rerouting mechanism: If there are messages on the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE and they are not indoubt, then - at every retry interval of the channel - the messages are get and put again by the cluster rerouting mechanism. This is done because the assigned destination may be not available (thats why its in retry), and the put will select an alternate available destination queue if there is one. This is done with syncpoint control, so it will use a lot of logging depending on the amout of messages and your cluster channel retry interval. We once filled up many cartridges with archive logs (during some days / weeks) because a testsystem was not available for a long period of time and there where some thousands of messages in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. I do not know if this rerouting mechanism is included in all MQ versions that support clustering, at least its in 5.2 on OS/390. Regards Stefan -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 01:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster I would assume that the message will remain on the cluster transmission queue until QM1 is back up running. There might be a difference in behavior depending on whether the log messages are persistent or not, but I'll leave that for somebody who has more real life experience with clustering than I have. Stefan From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:34:09 -0400 You are correct Stefan. (long day) I will need a XMIT queue, a remote queue def and a Channel between QM2 and QM3, just like between QM1 and QM3. Next question that I need verification on is as follows: Lets say I create a clustered local queue on QM1 called LOGQUEUE. For the sake of discussion, we are only concerned with putting to this queue. We want to insure that messages get there, because once a week we run a batch job to look at that queue. When QM1 and QM2 are both up, an app on QM2 can put to LOGQUEUE and the messages will end up on the local instance of LOGQUEUE on QM1, because LOGQUEUE is advertised to the cluster. IF QM1 goes down, an app on QM2 that puts to LOGQUEUE will have what happen? I assume the put will fail, right? And if so, I really should create a LOGQUEUE on both QM1 and QM2. Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 -Original Message- From: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Peter, this sounds more like a channel question than a QR def question. If you only have a channel from QM1 to QM3 and QM1 goes down, messages can't travel to QM3 unless you also have a channel from QM2 to QM3. Correct or am I missing the point? Cheers, Stefan From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:20:35 -0400 Maybe an obvious question... QM1 and QM2 are both full repositories of ClusterA. QM3 is not part of the cluster. QM1 has a remote queue def to QueueC on QM3. The remote queue def is a clustered queue in ClusterA. An app on either QM1 or QM2 can now put to QueueC. What if QM1 goes down? Is the app on QM2 now not able to get a message to QueueC? Do I need to make the remote queue def on both QM1 and QM2? Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and
Re: MQMVS:ways to allow people to alter only one queue attribute
Tom, I remember that this topic was discussed some time ago. I also seem to remember that someone claimed that it could be done. I was skeptical then and I still am. You may want to try the archives. Tom Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ET cc: Sent by: Subject: MQMVS:ways to allow people to alter only one queue MQSeries Listattribute MQSERIES@AKH-Wi en.AC.AT 09/17/2002 10:18 AM Please respond to MQSeries List Hi, Has anybody come up with ways to allow users to modify one attribute of a queue. For example triggering. I'm not a RACF expert, but looking at the MQADMIN and MQCMDS classes but it doesn't look like you can specify it down to the attribute level. tia Tom Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Application using BROWSE missing messages
hi all... I am looking for some help to solve a particular problem that we are facing here. The problem is explained below. We have a MQ based application written in C++ running in CICS and reading messages from MQ. The overall functioning logic of the application is as explained below. ||--( 1 ) Input queue opened for Browse with options and read in a LOOP till messages are over. ||MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT+MQOO_INPUT_SHARED | |and wait interval as 0. | | | |( 2 ) Use message (May have syncpoint calls in this process) | | | |( 3 ) IF DB deadlock of -911 THEN | |is got then ROLLBACK everything uncommitted, and repeat step 1 onwards with | |the following options MQGMO_WAIT+MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING+MQGMO_BROWSE_FIRST | |Change here is that the queue is again reopened fresh with a Browse_First option as shown above. | |ELSE | |Remove the message under syncpoint control with a destructive Get with the | |following options, MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_MSG_UNDER_CURSOR | |+ MQGMO_SYNCPOINT | | ENDIF | | | |--- ( 4 ) Perform a SYNCPOINT in CICS | | ( 5 ) Out of above loop when no more entries left in queue on error code 2033 | |( 6 ) Infinite wait on MQ Read by using the below options , |MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT and MQWI_UNLIMITED |Transaction is waiting on MQ to alert and wake this guy up when a message arrives. | |--- ( 7 ) Message arrives in queue and from this point step 1 onwards is repeated PROBLEM In the above logic that we are using we are using we have noticed that some-times a queue has 1 or 2 messages and the transaction in CICS is in GETWAIT waiting for messages to arrive. The 2 messages which get left out are never picked up where as further messages which arrive in that input queue are picked and processed. Anybody facing a problem like this or know of something in this regard. Also i see a PTF at the IBM site closed recently with details as below APAR CLOSEDATEyy/mm/dd PTF(s) Fixing APARif PTF in error HIPER? Description/comments PQ61246 02/08/15 UQ68768 MQGET WITH WAIT ISN'T POSTED ALTHOUGH THE QUEUE HAS A MESSAGE. Any IDEA as to how to get the details for this.. or anybody out there who might have actually have raised this particular problem. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards Sridhar R
Re: Application using BROWSE missing messages
Sridhar, why don't you just open an issue with IBM and ask for more detail? Or describe to them what you have and askif the apar you found fits. I grant you that this isn't exactly what you asked for, but it is one approach -- My best, Rebecca Rebecca Bullock Computer Sciences Corporation Educational Testing Service Account Princeton, NJ 08541 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Sridhar Ramasubramonian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:56 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Application using BROWSE missing messages hi all... I am looking for some help to solve a particular problem that we are facing here. The problem is explained below. We have a MQ based application written in C++ running in CICS and reading messages from MQ. The overall functioning logic of the application is as explained below. ||--( 1 ) Input queue opened for Browse with options and read in a LOOP till messages are over. ||MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT+MQOO_INPUT_SHARED | |and wait interval as 0. | | | |( 2 ) Use message (May have syncpoint calls in this process) | | | |( 3 ) IF DB deadlock of -911 THEN | |is got then ROLLBACK everything uncommitted, and repeat step 1 onwards with | |the following options MQGMO_WAIT+MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING+MQGMO_BROWSE_FIRST | |Change here is that the queue is again reopened fresh with a Browse_First option as shown above. | |ELSE | |Remove the message under syncpoint control with a destructive Get with the | |following options, MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_MSG_UNDER_CURSOR | |+ MQGMO_SYNCPOINT | | ENDIF | | | |--- ( 4 ) Perform a SYNCPOINT in CICS | | ( 5 ) Out of above loop when no more entries left in queue on error code 2033 | |( 6 ) Infinite wait on MQ Read by using the below options , |MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT and MQWI_UNLIMITED |Transaction is waiting on MQ to alert and wake this guy up when a message arrives. | |--- ( 7 ) Message arrives in queue and from this point step 1 onwards is repeated PROBLEM In the above logic that we are using we are using we have noticed that some-times a queue has 1 or 2 messages and the transaction in CICS is in GETWAIT waiting for messages to arrive. The 2 messages which get left out are never picked up where as further messages which arrive in that input queue are picked and processed. Anybody facing a problem like this or know of something in this regard. Also i see a PTF at the IBM site closed recently with details as below APAR CLOSEDATEyy/mm/dd PTF(s) Fixing APARif PTF in error HIPER? Description/comments PQ61246 02/08/15 UQ68768 MQGET WITH WAIT ISN'T POSTED ALTHOUGH THE QUEUE HAS A MESSAGE. Any IDEA as to how to get the details for this.. or anybody out there who might have actually have raised this particular problem. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards Sridhar R ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance.
FW: SUN Solaris Compile Script
The following note was sent to me from one of our developers. It concerns the problem of being able to compile a program having several subprograms. This is not necessarily an MQ problem but all our MQ programs have to be compiled for the Sun system. We have no problem on AIX or OS/390, just Sun. Anyone out there experience this problem?? Any suggestions greatly appreciated. BB. Bruce, I have a trouble to create an executable module from a separate compiled C-routine for the SUN Solaris machine. Can you provide me some asistance?Below is the script used to compile the routine separately: #!/bin/ksh # # compile the next 11 subprograms into object files # LIB=/usr/lib LVERSION=libshare.so.1 gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Buffdump.o Buffdump.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Extrfnme.o Extrfnme.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Getmemry.o Getmemry.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Gtconfig.o Gtconfig.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Writelog.o Writelog.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Writmess.o Writmess.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Sendrply.o Sendrply.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Dynalloc.o Dynalloc.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Crtmvsjb.o Crtmvsjb.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o getmess.o getmess.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o chkreply.o chkreply.c For the AIX machine, I have no problem to create the executable module. Below is the script that I use : 1. #!/bin/ksh # # compile the next 11 subprograms into object files # /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Buffdump.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Extrfnme.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Getmemry.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Gtconfig.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Writelog.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Writmess.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Sendrply.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Dynalloc.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Crtmvsjb.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm getmess.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm chkreply.c # # create share object file using the above object files # Note that create an entry in the export file (libadd.exp) # for each callable function name defined in the subprogram # /usr/vac/bin/xlc -o/common/shareobj.o -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm \ Buffdump.o \ Extrfnme.o \ Getmemry.o \ Gtconfig.o \ Writelog.o \ Writmess.o \ Sendrply.o \ Dynalloc.o \ Crtmvsjb.o \ getmess.o \ chkreply.o \ -bE:libadd.exp \ -bM:SRE -bnoentry exit The 1st step fo the above script is to compile each individual subprogram into an object file which is then used to create an share object file in the 2nd step. 2. Create an executable module for MASISGET for the AIX machine: #!/bin/ksh /usr/vac/bin/xlc -omasisget -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Masisget.c \ -L/u/ema/rel3.1 /common/shareobj.o exit Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
AW: AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster
David, workload balancing does not rely on qlocal. you can also use the workload balancing (the round-robin mechanism) with qalias or qremote queues. same name, same type. why defining remote queues as cluster queues? at least its the same why you make a qlocal or a qalias a cluster queue: all qmgrs within the cluster will know about the queue (full repository only, partial if they try to use the queue) so messages can be routed without any other queues defined. one example could be something like gateway function. if you have a destination queue on a qmgr outside the cluster (QMGRA), and there is one queuemanager within the cluster (QMGRB) that has connection to QMGRA and a remoteq that points to the destination queue, then - by making the remoteq a cluster queue - all queuemanagers within the cluster are able to put messages to this remoteq on QMGRB by using clustering, and QMGRB will send the messages to QMGRA using conventional channels. So every queuemanager within the cluster is able to send Messages to QMGRA outside the cluster by using QMGRB as a gateway (for this specific queue). it can also be used for qmgr alias within the cluster. Check section Auto-definition of remote queues and Using aliases and remote-queue definitions with clusters in the Queue Manager Clusters manual. Regards Stefan -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: David Yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 16:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Stefan, Thanks you for all your useful information. I have one question needs to ask you. What is the purpose of defining a remote queue with cluster attribute ? Defining a local queue of cluster have advantage of having multiple MQ's shares a cluster queue and does workload balance. But I don't see any reason to have remote defining as cluster. Thanks David --- Raabe, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Group, yes, messages will sit in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. There is no different behavior with message persistence. If messages are non persistence, they will be purged during queuemanager restart, no matter wheter they are in a qlocal, xmitq or cluster-xmitq. But you should be aware of the cluster-rerouting mechanism: If there are messages on the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE and they are not indoubt, then - at every retry interval of the channel - the messages are get and put again by the cluster rerouting mechanism. This is done because the assigned destination may be not available (thats why its in retry), and the put will select an alternate available destination queue if there is one. This is done with syncpoint control, so it will use a lot of logging depending on the amout of messages and your cluster channel retry interval. We once filled up many cartridges with archive logs (during some days / weeks) because a testsystem was not available for a long period of time and there where some thousands of messages in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. I do not know if this rerouting mechanism is included in all MQ versions that support clustering, at least its in 5.2 on OS/390. Regards Stefan -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 01:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster I would assume that the message will remain on the cluster transmission queue until QM1 is back up running. There might be a difference in behavior depending on whether the log messages are persistent or not, but I'll leave that for somebody who has more real life experience with clustering than I have. Stefan From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:34:09 -0400 You are correct Stefan. (long day) I will need a XMIT queue, a remote queue def and a Channel between QM2 and QM3, just like between QM1 and QM3. Next question that I need verification on is as follows: Lets say I create a clustered local queue on QM1 called LOGQUEUE. For the sake of discussion, we are only concerned with putting to this queue. We want to insure that messages get there, because once a week we run a batch job to look at that queue. When QM1 and QM2 are both up, an app on QM2 can put to LOGQUEUE and the messages will end up on the local instance of LOGQUEUE on QM1, because LOGQUEUE is advertised to the cluster. IF QM1 goes down, an app on QM2 that puts to LOGQUEUE will have what happen? I assume the put will fail, right? And if so, I really should create a LOGQUEUE on both QM1 and QM2. Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 -Original Message- From: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16,
Sending messages via satellite - latency problems
I am told that applications sending MQ messages using satellite should be sensitive to ten second (or more) Round Trip Delay timings. The problem is that if the RTD is set too low (ie. less than 10 seconds), then IP tries to retransmit the package thereby bulking up the bandwidth. Also, the Mean Transmission Unit (MTU) should be set less than 1500 (ie. 1492 or something like that). Is anyone out there using satellite transmission for MQ (not MQe) for messages? If so, how do you address this issue? Or, must we go to MQe? Thanx. BB. Bruce Barclay Cell: 613-794-8423 Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: Application using BROWSE missing messages
hi ronald.. This is not the case as i have all my transactions fully committed and in their sleep states. I also verified the number of threads and processes holding this queue and did not find any except the one reading and waiting on this. Somehow these 1 or 2 messages stays in the queue. Regards Sridhar -Original Message- From: Ronald Weinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 17:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Application using BROWSE missing messages messages could be recorded on the message count but not committed if there is syncpoint processing Sridhar Ramasubramonian [EMAIL PROTECTED] @AKH-Wien.AC.AT on 09/17/2002 10:56:29 AM Please respond to MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Application using BROWSE missing messages hi all... I am looking for some help to solve a particular problem that we are facing here. The problem is explained below. We have a MQ based application written in C++ running in CICS and reading messages from MQ. The overall functioning logic of the application is as explained below. ||--( 1 ) Input queue opened for Browse with options and read in a LOOP till messages are over. || MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT+MQOO_INPUT_SHARED | | and wait interval as 0. | | | | ( 2 ) Use message (May have syncpoint calls in this process) | | | | ( 3 ) IF DB deadlock of -911 THEN | | is got then ROLLBACK everything uncommitted, and repeat step 1 onwards with | | the following options MQGMO_WAIT+MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING+MQGMO_BROWSE_FIRST | | Change here is that the queue is again reopened fresh with a Browse_First option as shown above. | | ELSE | | Remove the message under syncpoint control with a destructive Get with the | | following options, MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_MSG_UNDER_CURSOR | | + MQGMO_SYNCPOINT | | ENDIF | | | |--- ( 4 ) Perform a SYNCPOINT in CICS | | ( 5 ) Out of above loop when no more entries left in queue on error code 2033 | | ( 6 ) Infinite wait on MQ Read by using the below options , | MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT and MQWI_UNLIMITED | Transaction is waiting on MQ to alert and wake this guy up when a message arrives. | |--- ( 7 ) Message arrives in queue and from this point step 1 onwards is repeated PROBLEM In the above logic that we are using we are using we have noticed that some-times a queue has 1 or 2 messages and the transaction in CICS is in GETWAIT waiting for messages to arrive. The 2 messages which get left out are never picked up where as further messages which arrive in that input queue are picked and processed. Anybody facing a problem like this or know of something in this regard. Also i see a PTF at the IBM site closed recently with details as below |---+---+---+---+---+---| | APAR | CLOSE| PTF(s) | Fixing | HIPER? | Descripti| | | DATE | | APAR | | on/commen| | | yy/mm/dd | | if PTF in| | ts | | | | | error| | | |---+---+---+---+---+---| | PQ61246 | 02/08/15 | UQ68768 | | | MQGET| | | | | | | WITH WAIT| | | | | | | ISN'T| | | | | | | POSTED | | | | | | | ALTHOUGH | | | | | | | THE QUEUE| | | | | | | HAS A| | | | | | | MESSAGE. | |---+---+---+---+---+---| Any IDEA as to how to get the details for this.. or anybody out there who might have actually have raised this particular problem. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards Sridhar R The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive:
Re: MQMVS:ways to allow people to alter only one queue attribute
Tom, I don't think there is a way to do exactly what you are asking, but you might want to look at the MQSET MQI command as opposed to an MQSC ALTER QUEUE command.MQSET can only alter a subset of the queue's attributes, and of the attributes which it is allowed to alter, most are related to triggering. -Tom == Tom Schneider / IBM Global Services (513) 533-3644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] == Tom Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/17/2002 10:18 AM Please respond to MQSeries List To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:MQMVS:ways to allow people to alter only one queue attribute Hi, Has anybody come up with ways to allow users to modify one attribute of a queue. For example triggering. I'm not a RACF expert, but looking at the MQADMIN and MQCMDS classes but it doesn't look like you can specify it down to the attribute level. tia Tom Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: Application using BROWSE missing messages
Sridhar Messages not commited by the sender apear on the message count ...but you will not be able to process them. Adrian ait research - Original Message - From: Sridhar Ramasubramonian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: Application using BROWSE missing messages hi all... I am looking for some help to solve a particular problem that we are facing here. The problem is explained below. We have a MQ based application written in C++ running in CICS and reading messages from MQ. The overall functioning logic of the application is as explained below. ||--( 1 ) Input queue opened for Browse with options and read in a LOOP till messages are over. ||MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT+MQOO_INPUT_SHARED | |and wait interval as 0. | | | |( 2 ) Use message (May have syncpoint calls in this process) | | | |( 3 ) IF DB deadlock of -911 THEN | |is got then ROLLBACK everything uncommitted, and repeat step 1 onwards with | |the following options MQGMO_WAIT+MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING+MQGMO_BROWSE_FIRST | |Change here is that the queue is again reopened fresh with a Browse_First option as shown above. | |ELSE | |Remove the message under syncpoint control with a destructive Get with the | |following options, MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_MSG_UNDER_CURSOR | |+ MQGMO_SYNCPOINT | | ENDIF | | | |--- ( 4 ) Perform a SYNCPOINT in CICS | | ( 5 ) Out of above loop when no more entries left in queue on error code 2033 | |( 6 ) Infinite wait on MQ Read by using the below options , |MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT and MQWI_UNLIMITED |Transaction is waiting on MQ to alert and wake this guy up when a message arrives. | |--- ( 7 ) Message arrives in queue and from this point step 1 onwards is repeated PROBLEM In the above logic that we are using we are using we have noticed that some-times a queue has 1 or 2 messages and the transaction in CICS is in GETWAIT waiting for messages to arrive. The 2 messages which get left out are never picked up where as further messages which arrive in that input queue are picked and processed. Anybody facing a problem like this or know of something in this regard. Also i see a PTF at the IBM site closed recently with details as below APAR CLOSEDATEyy/mm/dd PTF(s) Fixing APARif PTF in error HIPER? Description/comments PQ61246 02/08/15 UQ68768 MQGET WITH WAIT ISN'T POSTED ALTHOUGH THE QUEUE HAS A MESSAGE. Any IDEA as to how to get the details for this.. or anybody out there who might have actually have raised this particular problem. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards Sridhar R
Re: Application using BROWSE missing messages
hi adrian.. I have a MVS Mainview monitor here and through that i have verified at the point i got the error, that there were not uncommitted records in this queue. Is there any other thing that i am missing. Regards Sridhar -Original Message-From: Adrian König [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 17:52To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Application using BROWSE missing messages Sridhar Messages not commited by the sender apear on the message count ...but you will not be able to process them. Adrian ait research - Original Message - From: Sridhar Ramasubramonian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: Application using BROWSE missing messages hi all... I am looking for some help to solve a particular problem that we are facing here. The problem is explained below. We have a MQ based application written in C++ running in CICS and reading messages from MQ. The overall functioning logic of the application is as explained below. ||--( 1 ) Input queue opened for Browse with options and read in a LOOP till messages are over. ||MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT+MQOO_INPUT_SHARED | |and wait interval as 0. | | | |( 2 ) Use message (May have syncpoint calls in this process) | | | |( 3 ) IF DB deadlock of -911 THEN | |is got then ROLLBACK everything uncommitted, and repeat step 1 onwards with | |the following options MQGMO_WAIT+MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING+MQGMO_BROWSE_FIRST | |Change here is that the queue is again reopened fresh with a Browse_First option as shown above. | |ELSE | |Remove the message under syncpoint control with a destructive Get with the | |following options, MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_MSG_UNDER_CURSOR | |+ MQGMO_SYNCPOINT | | ENDIF | | | |--- ( 4 ) Perform a SYNCPOINT in CICS | | ( 5 ) Out of above loop when no more entries left in queue on error code 2033 | |( 6 ) Infinite wait on MQ Read by using the below options , |MQGMO_WAIT + MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING + MQGMO_BROWSE_NEXT and MQWI_UNLIMITED |Transaction is waiting on MQ to alert and wake this guy up when a message arrives. | |--- ( 7 ) Message arrives in queue and from this point step 1 onwards is repeated PROBLEM In the above logic that we are using we are using we have noticed that some-times a queue has 1 or 2 messages and the transaction in CICS is in GETWAIT waiting for messages to arrive. The 2 messages which get left out are never picked up where as further messages which arrive in that input queue are picked and processed. Anybody facing a problem like this or know of something in this regard. Also i see a PTF at the IBM site closed recently with details as below APAR CLOSEDATEyy/mm/dd PTF(s) Fixing APARif PTF in error HIPER? Description/comments PQ61246 02/08/15 UQ68768 MQGET WITH WAIT ISN'T POSTED ALTHOUGH THE QUEUE HAS A MESSAGE. Any IDEA as to how to get the details for this.. or anybody out there who might have actually have raised this particular problem. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards Sridhar R
Re: AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster
Stefan, I got it. Thanks you for sharing this information with me. David -Original Message- From: Raabe, Stefan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:AW: AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster David, workload balancing does not rely on qlocal. you can also use the workload balancing (the round-robin mechanism) with qalias or qremote queues. same name, same type. why defining remote queues as cluster queues? at least its the same why you make a qlocal or a qalias a cluster queue: all qmgrs within the cluster will know about the queue (full repository only, partial if they try to use the queue) so messages can be routed without any other queues defined. one example could be something like gateway function. if you have a destination queue on a qmgr outside the cluster (QMGRA), and there is one queuemanager within the cluster (QMGRB) that has connection to QMGRA and a remoteq that points to the destination queue, then - by making the remoteq a cluster queue - all queuemanagers within the cluster are able to put messages to this remoteq on QMGRB by using clustering, and QMGRB will send the messages to QMGRA using conventional channels. So every queuemanager within the cluster is able to send Messages to QMGRA outside the cluster by using QMGRB as a gateway (for this specific queue). it can also be used for qmgr alias within the cluster. Check section Auto-definition of remote queues and Using aliases and remote-queue definitions with clusters in the Queue Manager Clusters manual. Regards Stefan -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: David Yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 16:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Stefan, Thanks you for all your useful information. I have one question needs to ask you. What is the purpose of defining a remote queue with cluster attribute ? Defining a local queue of cluster have advantage of having multiple MQ's shares a cluster queue and does workload balance. But I don't see any reason to have remote defining as cluster. Thanks David --- Raabe, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Group, yes, messages will sit in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. There is no different behavior with message persistence. If messages are non persistence, they will be purged during queuemanager restart, no matter wheter they are in a qlocal, xmitq or cluster-xmitq. But you should be aware of the cluster-rerouting mechanism: If there are messages on the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE and they are not indoubt, then - at every retry interval of the channel - the messages are get and put again by the cluster rerouting mechanism. This is done because the assigned destination may be not available (thats why its in retry), and the put will select an alternate available destination queue if there is one. This is done with syncpoint control, so it will use a lot of logging depending on the amout of messages and your cluster channel retry interval. We once filled up many cartridges with archive logs (during some days / weeks) because a testsystem was not available for a long period of time and there where some thousands of messages in the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE. I do not know if this rerouting mechanism is included in all MQ versions that support clustering, at least its in 5.2 on OS/390. Regards Stefan -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 01:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster I would assume that the message will remain on the cluster transmission queue until QM1 is back up running. There might be a difference in behavior depending on whether the log messages are persistent or not, but I'll leave that for somebody who has more real life experience with clustering than I have. Stefan From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Queue Def in a Cluster Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:34:09 -0400 You are correct Stefan. (long day) I will need a XMIT queue, a remote queue def and a Channel between QM2 and QM3, just like between QM1 and QM3. Next question that I need verification on is as follows: Lets say I create a clustered local queue on QM1 called LOGQUEUE. For the sake of discussion, we are only concerned with putting to this queue. We want to insure that messages get there, because once a week we run a batch job to look at that queue. When QM1 and QM2 are both up, an app on QM2 can put to LOGQUEUE and the messages will end up on the local instance of LOGQUEUE on QM1, because LOGQUEUE is advertised to the cluster. IF QM1 goes down, an app on QM2 that puts to LOGQUEUE will have what happen? I assume the put will
Re: SUN Solaris Compile Script
I strongly recommend you use make. Using a script is like going in with a scoop shovel when a teaspoon will do. Make will let you do a build so that if only one of the routines has changed, that's the only one that compiles. To learn make, get the O'Reilly book Managing Projects with make. You'll find make useful on both your Solaris and AIX platforms and can use one set of rules for building on both. Just be aware of the differences in the output of the two when watching for errors. If you're not doing version control, you might also want to start using something like RCS. O'Reilly has a book on that, too. Good luck, Bruce === Bruce Olsen System Integration Strategy and Architecture Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (727) 898-8851 Mobile: (727) 421-0865 Fax: (507) 262-1567 -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Barclay Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: SUN Solaris Compile Script The following note was sent to me from one of our developers. It concerns the problem of being able to compile a program having several subprograms. This is not necessarily an MQ problem but all our MQ programs have to be compiled for the Sun system. We have no problem on AIX or OS/390, just Sun. Anyone out there experience this problem?? Any suggestions greatly appreciated. BB. Bruce, I have a trouble to create an executable module from a separate compiled C-routine for the SUN Solaris machine. Can you provide me some asistance?Below is the script used to compile the routine separately: #!/bin/ksh # # compile the next 11 subprograms into object files # LIB=/usr/lib LVERSION=libshare.so.1 gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Buffdump.o Buffdump.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Extrfnme.o Extrfnme.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Getmemry.o Getmemry.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Gtconfig.o Gtconfig.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Writelog.o Writelog.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Writmess.o Writmess.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Sendrply.o Sendrply.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Dynalloc.o Dynalloc.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o Crtmvsjb.o Crtmvsjb.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o getmess.o getmess.c gcc -g -c -fPIC -I/usr/include -o chkreply.o chkreply.c For the AIX machine, I have no problem to create the executable module. Below is the script that I use : 1. #!/bin/ksh # # compile the next 11 subprograms into object files # /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Buffdump.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Extrfnme.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Getmemry.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Gtconfig.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Writelog.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Writmess.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Sendrply.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Dynalloc.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Crtmvsjb.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm getmess.c /usr/vac/bin/xlc -c -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm chkreply.c # # create share object file using the above object files # Note that create an entry in the export file (libadd.exp) # for each callable function name defined in the subprogram # /usr/vac/bin/xlc -o/common/shareobj.o -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm \ Buffdump.o \ Extrfnme.o \ Getmemry.o \ Gtconfig.o \ Writelog.o \ Writmess.o \ Sendrply.o \ Dynalloc.o \ Crtmvsjb.o \ getmess.o \ chkreply.o \ -bE:libadd.exp \ -bM:SRE -bnoentry exit The 1st step fo the above script is to compile each individual subprogram into an object file which is then used to create an share object file in the 2nd step. 2. Create an executable module for MASISGET for the AIX machine: #!/bin/ksh /usr/vac/bin/xlc -omasisget -L/usr/mqm/lib -lmqm Masisget.c \ -L/u/ema/rel3.1 /common/shareobj.o exit Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
looking for MbService example (mqsi jplugin )
Does anyone have example code logging a message ( MbService.logWarning() ) in a jplugin using the MbService class - it's not clear to me what to pass to the inserts (array of objects that constitutes the inserts into the ResourceBundle message referenced by the messageKey. Thanks, Charles Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
AMQCLCHL.TAB for OpenVMS
Hi, We have MQSeries Server on Windows NT. We tested OpenVMS client connectivity once after which name of the NT server was changed. Any new Queue Manager that is created on the server can be accessed from OpenVMS. But we cannot access existing (prior to renaming) Queue Managers. The OpenVMS connects using file AMQCLCHL.TAB How can we recreate this file for existing Queue Managers? Thanks == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: AMQCLCHL.TAB for OpenVMS
Are you using one amqclchl.tab for all your qmgrs, new and existing? If so, you should be able to update the connection name for these existing qmgrs and re-export the channel table. -Original Message- From: Joshi, A (Anant) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AMQCLCHL.TAB for OpenVMS Hi, We have MQSeries Server on Windows NT. We tested OpenVMS client connectivity once after which name of the NT server was changed. Any new Queue Manager that is created on the server can be accessed from OpenVMS. But we cannot access existing (prior to renaming) Queue Managers. The OpenVMS connects using file AMQCLCHL.TAB How can we recreate this file for existing Queue Managers? Thanks == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
C++ makefile for HP
Does anybody have a good C++ makefile for HP? With the aCC compiler? I found a post from last year that had an aCC command that turned out would link it. And I also have a makefile that I created that will compile, but call ld to link and that doesn't work. So, I can manually put them togother, but haven't figured out how to do it under one makefile. If anybody has one that they can share, I should be good.I can't seem to find any supportPacs that have one either :( Thanks Tom
Message Exit parameters not showing up in MQExplorer or runmqsc ( with exit)
Hi everyone, I have a very strange problem here. I have a configuration on NT to AIX where there are queue managers on both the machines. Now there is a sender-receiver channel from NT to AIX. And I have a message exit which is deployed on the receiving end of the channel. Now the strange part is that once i have the exit put in the parameters of the receiver channel and the channel is running, I am unable to see the name of the message exit in the channel properties. I am also not able to see the same in using 'runmqsc' on AIX. The exit is working perfectly well on the channel. I tested that out. Only thing is that i am not able to view or make changes to the channel properties of the message exit or send or receive exit. The only properties (exit wize) which are visible are the security exit ones. This is the same in the 'runmqsc' also. I had a same combo running from the same NT machine to another AIX machine and I was able to view all these exit properties. But it is on this AIX machine I am unable to do so. (This happens only when I am using the message exit in it). The exit is working fine. I tried using the MO71 pac and it was showing the same properties for the channels. I mean exit wise it was only showing the security exit. Now is this some property of the MQSC commands? or PCF commands? That once a message exit is deployed that only security exit is visible? I am puzzled on why I am able to see the same on other AIX machines although I have the same exit deployed there...same executable... Thanks in advance for your help. Kind Regards Aby Philip Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
MQ Visual Edit beta v0.3.5
All: I have released the next beta v0.3.5 of MQ Visual Edit. The following enhancements / fixes have been made: - Added code to show / hide the message descriptor (MQMD) columns. - Added code to support Loading or Saving of individual messages to / from a text file. - Added code to handle the Enter and Esc key strokes in the Open Queue, Find, Forward and Preferences windows. - Added code to support double left click in the main panel to edit a message. - Added right mouse button popup menu. Select a message(s) and then press the right mouse button. - Added code to sort the contents of the Queue Manager Access Profile list box. - Introduced Clyde to tell you when the queue is closed. - Fixed Alias Queue bug. - Fixed table header scroll bug. - Merged the Insert New Message and Simple Message Edit windows together. - Added accelerator keys - e.g. CTRL-O to open a queue. - More enhancements for deleting messages faster. - Updated docs (English only) You can download MQ Visual Edit at: http://www.capitalware.biz/beta.html Note: This is an on-going project, so please send comments and / or complaints to me. Also, this beta will last for 10 weeks (end of November) rather than the usual 6 weeks. Before I make the next major revisions, I would like to hear what people think of it - good or bad. later Roger Lacroix Enterprise Architect Capitalware Inc. http://www.capitalware.biz IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries IBM Certified Developer - MQSeries IBM Certified Solutions Expert - MQSeries Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
