Re: [[newbie] pppd problem]

1999-08-21 Thread Rick Fry

My ISP [and former employer] uses DHCP and all addresses are server 
assigned. Will it accept a quad 0 address?


Andy Goth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Mandrake 6.0, I'm trying to connect to the Internet using this new
56K modem.  It dials... it connects... and then it disconnects.

It says something about pppd timing out.

I've attached my PPP-logfile.  Maybe it'll help.
===
Have you appropriately edited your /etc/reolve.conf?
add
search your isp
nameserver dns# provided by your isp
nameserver dns# provided by your isp

That should do it  8^)
Mike



Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-20 Thread Rick Fry




Original Message Follows
From: Rick Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  it is. So, forget all these .config files we seem to have to manually 
edit with wonderful devices such as VI. [BLEAH!!]

 You know, there _are_ more intuitive editors out there--lots of
them, in fact.  I like pico, but kedit is pretty good as well.  Of
course, there aren't that many cases any more where you _have_ to
manually edit the .conf files, as software like linuxconf and others
tend to work as well.  Also, I guess this means you've never had to hack 
the Windows registry?

Nope. Never have. In as much as I'm comfortable using regedit, I've never 
had to use it to get something to work. That's not the point. Having to 
manually edit things was one of the major downfalls of OffulStinky/2. Then, 
of course, they were plagued by bad management, marketing and just a plain 
gawd awful stupid looking system. Heck, I'm running 2000 release candidate 1 
now. Yes, the betas had their problems. But, that's why they call them 
BETA!!!

When you can make a version of this Linux, whether it be Red Hat or 
 Mandrake, that's better at plug 'n play than Windows, maybe more of us 
will start using it on a more pronounced basis.

 "So, quitcherbeleakin" yourself.  Linux is getting much better at 
PnP, though it admittedly isn't to the level of Windows yet.  Windows 
isn't anywhere near the level of the Mac, either, so why are you holding 
Windows out as the holy grail of PnP?

Because it is. Unix has been around eons before Mr. Gates' MSDOS or even 
Windows. You'd think that someone would have gotten it right by now. Gates 
took the MacIntrash environment and made it work. One of my many employment 
endeavors was collecting shareware and freeware for the PC, Mac, Amiga [now 
THERE's an underrated machine] and the Atari. I've been there, done that and 
saw the movie. My first computer was in 1979. It was a TRS-80 Model I Level 
I with 16K of memory and the only storage device was a casette recorder. 
That was back just before the Crapple ][ came out with it's TRS-80 wannabe 
style.






___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



RE: [newbie] Not getting anywhere!!

1999-08-20 Thread Rick Fry

I'll be the first to admit that the monitor that I use is a $200 special at 
Sears. And, I too am getting the black on black menus and background until I 
put a graphic back there. Then the labels are black on black and so are the 
menus until I highlight them. Right now, I'm using Windows 2000 release 
candidate 1 with the monitor set at 1280x1024 at 24 bit color with NO 
problems like I'm getting in Linux. Even Windows 98 second edition uses 
these parameters.


Original Message Follows
I had a similar video configuration problem.  The default setting
Xconfigurator was choosing was giving a black screen with blackish icons (I
think that means that the refresh rates don't synch).  My problem was solved
by manually choosing my display settings in Xconfigurator.  Another thing I
tried is reducing the type of monitor to one not quite so good (in custom
monitor section).  My monitor, being on the cheaper end of the scale does
not work well at its maximum settings.  By reducing the setting the picture
quality improved considerably.

I suffered similar problems using my hardware with Windows 95.  My monitor
does not perform well at its maximum refresh rates etc and I have terrible
problems under Win95 with my AWE64 soundcard.  If the soundcard is enabled
in the device manager, Windows will not boot.  I have to boot with the
soundcard disabled and then manually turn on the soundcard using Device tab
- a real pain in the arse if you forget to turn it off at the end of the
session (Windows crashes on startup, reboot into safe mode, turn soundcard
off, reboot again).

I might have problems with sound permissions with my Linux box, but at least
the card makes noise!

  -Original Message-
  From:Rick Fry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:Friday, 20 August 1999 9:43
  To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Not getting anywhere!!
 
  My sentiments exactly. I finally got my video configuration to go 
1024x768
 
  but the menus [for the most part] are black on black. This makes it just 
a
 
  tad difficult to read.
 
 
  Original Message Follows
 
  Well I think I am going to give up on my install of Mandrake.
 
  I cannot get it to recognize my modem or sound card.
 
  I have found out the my modem is on Com3 IRQ11   but have found no way..
  even with everyones help of finding it or configuring it.
 
  As for my sound card it is found by linux when it boots.. but it aborts
  putting it in memory because it is sharing an IRQ with another item on 
the
  PCI bus.. which is fine in windows but not in linux I guess..
 
  So thanks all for your help.. but this is just not hardware friendly
  enough
  for my current system.
 
  I guess if I want to run Linux I am going to have to build a specific box
  with all the specific hardware able to be detected and run.
 
  James
 
 
 
  ___
  Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Newbie Asks: What Is The Thumbtack For?

1999-08-20 Thread Rick Fry

Now that I know about AutoMount and Sticky, how do I tell Linux to use 
AutoMount? Which one of those wonderful .config files do I have to edit? 
Also, how do I change from that KDE back to Gnome? I think I prefer that to 
KDE. Thanks.


Original Message Follows
Sevatio Octavio wrote:
 
  In KDE...
  What is "Sticky"  the Thumbtack used for?
 

To keep that specific window on the screen if you change virtual
desktops (clicking on the 'One', 'Two', etc)

--
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Not getting anywhere!!

1999-08-20 Thread Rick Fry


Original Message Follows
Rick Fry wrote:
 
If you're happy being a user, that's fine.  There are plenty of people
in the world that just want things to work when they sit down at them.
My parents are those kinds of people.  I have no problem with it, just
don't shit on the parade of those of us who really LIKE making things
work together that probably don't belong together.

There is a price you pay (right now) for using Linux.  That price is
diminished hardware support "out of the box".  It could even be as steep as 
"it will never work with Linux" (in the case of WinModems).  Most of us are 
perfectly willing to pay that price for an operating system and supporting 
applications that don't nickel and dime us to death trying to get some work 
done.

I don't have any inkling of encouraging my parents to move to Linux.
The things they want to do are not available with it.  However, they
also don't have the kind of power and flexibility on their machine that I 
have with mine.

To each their own...
--

Actually the same thing can be said for all the Windows bashing folks that 
have the same amount of troubles getting that to work. I do have the "power 
and flexibility" but obviously not the right kind. I just became unemployed 
so I obviously don't have the financial resources to go out and buy the 
equipment necessary to make Linux work as ideally as my Windows does. But, 
that will hopefully change as I have several interviews scheduled for next 
week. Hopefully my 20 years of working with computers will be good for 
something.


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



RE: [newbie] OT:Trolls - Past, Present and Future

1999-08-20 Thread Rick Fry

I can fake email addresses, too. When I used to write messages in the adult 
newsgroups, I was [EMAIL PROTECTED] That doesn't mean the 
domain actually exists. I don't care what the header said, this Rick Fry at 
hotmail.com did NOT write that.


Original Message Follows
Rick Fry wrote:
I did NOT write that. As I said in a previous post, I don't resort
to writing these types of messages. I gave up on that years ago when I
realized that there are more effective ways to get a point across. And I
resent the implication that I'm a moron. I'm only 56 years old and haven't
yet reached that plateau. Looks like somebody needs to learn how to cut and
paste stuff in their respective editors. One more time, RICK FRY DID NOT
WRITE THAT
EXPLETIVE DELETED MESSAGE

It's not a matter of somebody needing "to learn how to cut and paste
stuff...". The following is how the original message that started this looks
to me. Please notice the "From" field. I did not cut a paste this:


-Original Message-----
    From:   Rick Fry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, August 20, 1999 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [newbie] Not getting anywhere

I give up on this stupid fucking so-called operating system!
It's totally F*G USELESS
Windows is FAR superior and you bunch of sad
losers are just wasting your lives.




Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com


Rick
Rick Friedman
Salant Corp. - MIS
800-472-8013 x75105
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- The closest thing to heaven on earth is... Yankee Stadium!


-Original Message-----
    From:   Rick Fry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, August 20, 1999 9:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [newbie] OT:Trolls - Past, Present and Future

I did NOT write that. As I said in a previous post, I don't resort
to
writing these types of messages. I gave up on that years ago when I
realized
that there are more effective ways to get a point across. And I
resent the
implication that I'm a moron. I'm only 56 years old and haven't yet
reached
that plateau. Looks like somebody needs to learn how to cut and
paste stuff
in their respective editors. One more time, RICK FRY DID NOT WRITE
THAT
EXPLETIVE DELETED MESSAGE


Original Message Follows
Just a thought for all the good people at Mandrake and the
good people on this list.  It might be in order to deny
access to this list to any accounts from any of the
anonymous mail services.

I have seen these seen far too much abuse of these services
by spammers and other morons (not pointing my finger directly
at Rick Fry, who am I kidding, yes I am).  I feel if the
interest in this list is genuine there is no need to hide
behind the curtain of an anonymous service and it would
free up the list from this kind of moronic abuse.

Ken Wilson
Not as small 'l' liberal as I used to be.


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Not getting anywhere!!

1999-08-19 Thread Rick Fry

My sentiments exactly. I finally got my video configuration to go 1024x768 
but the menus [for the most part] are black on black. This makes it just a 
tad difficult to read.


Original Message Follows

Well I think I am going to give up on my install of Mandrake.

I cannot get it to recognize my modem or sound card.

I have found out the my modem is on Com3 IRQ11   but have found no way..
even with everyones help of finding it or configuring it.

As for my sound card it is found by linux when it boots.. but it aborts
putting it in memory because it is sharing an IRQ with another item on the
PCI bus.. which is fine in windows but not in linux I guess..

So thanks all for your help.. but this is just not hardware friendly enough
for my current system.

I guess if I want to run Linux I am going to have to build a specific box
with all the specific hardware able to be detected and run.

James



___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-19 Thread Rick Fry


I'm sorry Gavin but as one that just left a position as technical support 
for a medium sized ISP after almost 2 years, I can say that most of my 
customers are smart enough to not expect that mythical 56K speed. For the 
most part, we're aware that the speed is multidependent in that it comes 
close to the restrictions on DSL connects. Things like number of pairs in 
any given cable, the ambient temperature around those pairs and the 
possibility of noise from outside influences including the number of birds 
sitting on any given cable and how many of their toes are touching the 
wires. They would, however, like to achieve at least 33.6K or at least the 
average 40K connect speeds.

Also, you *nix guys that seem to have nothing but bad things to say about 
Windows are slowly realizing what some of us are finding out about *nix in a 
more pronounced way. Obviously these vendors, such as Diamond and others, 
that refuse to write drivers for *nix must know something that we don't. 
Somebody once commented about the plug 'n play capabilities of Windows. I'm 
finding that it's even less pronounced in *nix. So, quitcherbeleakin. Some 
of us don't really care how to make a watch. We just want to know what time 
it is. So, forget all these .config files we seem to have to manually edit 
with wonderful devices such as VI. [BLEAH!!] When you can make a version of 
this Linux, whether it be Red Hat or Mandrake, that's better at plug 'n play 
than Windows, maybe more of us will start using it on a more pronounced 
basis.

It's starting to sound like the OS/2 wars we used to get into years ago. 
Then, let's not forget about CP/M even a few more years ago that I owned 3 
different copies of that were totally incompatible with each other. Forget 
the competition. [Oh yeah, I'm leaving my position as technical support 
because of an acquisition and a merger. Not because of anything I did.]

Original Message Follows
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, you wrote:
You'd be amazed at how many people connect at 49k and then we look at
there actual speed on the terminal server and its like 40k.  this used to be 
a big flaw in the old x2.  I think v.90 is the worst thing since windows.  
Anyone who doesnt connect at the impossible 56,000 thinks that there isp is 
messed up little do they know that their is many factors that play roles in 
your connect speed.

Regards,
Gavin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   ENTER.NET - "The Road to the Internet Starts Here!" (tm)
   (610) 437-2221 * http://www.enter.net/ * email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] KDE won't load at all!

1999-08-18 Thread Rick Fry

Yeah. But on the upside, there's supposed to be a 3.5 version of the XFree86 
coming out soon. Hopefully that will address the lacking of support for the 
Diamond A50 card.


Original Message Follows
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Rick Fry wrote:

  That's the same thing I get when I try to modify the X86 config file 
trying
  to put in the correct frequencies for my monitor so I can get better
  graphics. Unless I can get at least 1024x768 in 24 bit color, FreeBSD is
  looking pretty good right now. Oh well, another $80 bucks.

It probably won't help much - FreeBSD and Linux use the same
implementation of X (XFree86 3.3.something).

LLaP
bero

--
Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/



___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



RE: [newbie] KDE won't load at all!

1999-08-18 Thread Rick Fry

Basically it goes through all the various video settings in XF86Config and 
says it can't use any of them and drops back to the command prompt with the 
"Cannot connect with the X server" error. I get the same damned thing. With 
two versions of Windows running at 1280x1024 with 24 bit color, I don't 
really want to use 800x600 with 256 colors. Can't wait for the new 3.5 
version of XFree86.


Original Message Follows
What kind of error msg's are you getting?  Somewhere in those msg's lies the 
answer to what is not starting (my biggest offender has been the mouse).

Regards,

Joseph Gardner
Senior Designer / Technical Support
Kirby Company
Cleveland, OH


-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, August 17, 1999 12:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[newbie] KDE won't load at all!

KDE won't load it says "Error: Can't connect With X server"
and it repeats other error messages that are similar to that X server error.
 attach3 


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Linux or Mandrake

1999-08-18 Thread Rick Fry

Mandrake took Red Hat's source code and modified it. The differences can 
only be really determined by what hardware you have to run it on.


Original Message Follows
Can someone tell me what is the difference  between Mandrake Linux and
Red Hat Linux ?
Advantages and/or  disadvantages?

Dave Reinhardt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.WoodsideDelSer.com


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-18 Thread Rick Fry

What does it take to write a video card driver that some hotshot unix guru 
programmer can't come up with? If they can talk the talk, how about trying 
to walk the walk? I keep hearing about what geniuses inhabit the Unix crowd, 
how about putting up or shutting up?


Original Message Follows
On 16-Aug-99 Rick Fry wrote:

That 'silly reason' is that like most manufacturers Diamond does not bother 
making Linux drivers for its products.  You're throwing your blame in the 
wrong direction.


-Tom



___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] KDE won't load at all!

1999-08-17 Thread Rick Fry

That's the same thing I get when I try to modify the X86 config file trying 
to put in the correct frequencies for my monitor so I can get better 
graphics. Unless I can get at least 1024x768 in 24 bit color, FreeBSD is 
looking pretty good right now. Oh well, another $80 bucks.


Original Message Follows
KDE won't load it says "Error: Can't connect With X server"
and it repeats other error messages that are similar to that X server error.


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Boot hang

1999-08-17 Thread Rick Fry

I just set my partitions up witht he swap and the / linux native and 
Mandrake did the rest. Get it installed first and then decide what other 
goodies you want to add. That's one of the many bugs in RedHat's install 
program. Mine kept wanting to toss a double slash in the path to one of the 
segments it was installing. When I went for the / native and the swap, all 
installed just fine.


Original Message Follows
I have a P100, 48 megs, 6.4 gig system that I did the standard server
install from Mandrake 6.0 after partitioning the drive using fdisk.
After getting an initial disk error "1790", it recognized my disk
properly as a Maxtor 90648D3 6.4 gig and I was allowed to create "hda1"
of 128 megs for SWAP, "hda2"  4 gigs for "/" linux native and activated,
and "hda3" for "/home". I then was sent into Disk Druid and renamed hda2
as "/" and saved.  The installation went perfect(supposedly) but when I
reboot I still get the the 1790 Disk Error and the the system hangs
after printing "LI_". I tried to use the emergency disk created during
the install and the same thing happens.

Any suggestions?

Victor



___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] KDE won't load at all!

1999-08-17 Thread Rick Fry

I haven't even configured my network yet and still get that error. It's 
talking about the X server. Not the network server. We're just trying to get 
Linux [RedHat OR Mandrake] to give us more than 800x600 with 256 colors.


Original Message Follows
have you been messing with network settings?


On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, you wrote:
  KDE won't load it says "Error: Can't connect With X server"
  and it repeats other error messages that are similar to that X server 
error.
--
Brett Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Any HTML editors for X?

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry

Another good place to check is www.tucows.com where they've built up a great 
linux area of software.


Original Message Follows
At 02:51 16/08/99 -0700, you wrote:
 IS there any good GUI HTML editing software out there that can be used in
 X-Windows? I would like to make a web page and upload it to my web site at
 Geocities.
 
 Postman

I quite liked BlueFish - "http://bluefish.linuxbox.com"
Although not up there with the likes of HotMetal, I
found it pretty useful.

hih
nick@nexnix

 
 


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry

Cute. I'm running Mandrake 6.0 with crummy graphics, Windows 98 second 
edition and Windows 2000 release candidate 1 with 1280 by 1024 by 24 bit 
graphics and I haven't seen a bsod in months. I'm running on a celeron 400 
with 128M of ram and 20G of disk space. Haven't frozen up or crashed in that 
many months either. In as much as I'm willing to learn Linux/Unix, you guys 
need to get out of the Windows 95/Windows 3.1 syndrome. Windows has grown up 
lately and it's obviously passed you by.

Ooops, I take that back. The machine has frozen up a couple of times trying 
to get my version of Red Hat to give me better graphics.


Original Message Follows

I've only been using linux since May and it's now just about all I use at 
home.  It's as easy to use as windows.  In fact, I foret I'm  not in 
windows, except no BSOD ;o)




___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry

I'm running release candidate 1 as we speak. In 1280x1024 at 24 bit color, 
by the way.


Original Message Follows
--
Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Linux drive disappeared!

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry

Unless there's a 3rd party utility to do it, you won't. I have Win 98 and 
Win 2000 sharing a 13G drive and Linux on it's own 5.7G drive. Windows 
[either flavor] can't see the Linux drive.


Original Message Follows
I am running Linux and Windows 98 on the same computer but on different
hard drives.  After setting aside a 2.1 Gb drive ( drive D:\ ) for the
Linux OS, I installed Linux successfully.  But when I go into windows,
it seems to not recognize the drive where I am storing the Linux OS.
What was drive E now becomes drive D.  And now,  when I open My
Computer, both the E: drive and F: drives have the cd-rom icon.
Originally, my F: drive is my CD-ROM drive.

How do I make Windows recognize the Linux drive?  Or is there another
way to solve this problem??

thanks,

Brandon




___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] word processing and finance apps

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry

The rumor mill reports that Intuit may be working on a Linux version of 
Quicken and you've got WordPerfect 8 [download version] on one of the 5 
disks that came with Mandrake.


Original Message Follows
anyone got any suggestions on what word processing or simple check book
balancing programs to use for linux?  i am used to ms word, so i would
like something that has comparable features.  also, i tried to run cbb
(checkbook balancer) that comes with mandrake 6.0, but it wont run and
gives lots of errors.

:P


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Linux drive disappeared!

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry

Cool it with the Windoze, eh? They're the only two systems I have that 
actually work on my machine right now. I had RedHat 6 and then overwrote it 
with Mandrake. Several folks that I highly respect as programmers have told 
me that RedHat 6 has so many buggies in it that it makes NT 4.0 look good. 
They also feel that RedHat 6's masking is either excessively broken or 
nonexistant. IMHO that's BAD. Even Mandrake is giving me hissy fits. This 
stupid graphics problem is driving me up the walls and I'm not buying a new 
monitor because it can't be supported by Linux.


Original Message Follows
From: brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  How do I make Windows recognize the Linux drive?  Or is there another
  way to solve this problem??

 You don't--the Linux filesystem is a format which is unreadable by
Windows.  There are some utilities which can read it under Windoze,
however.




___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Internet Explorer for Linux? Is there such a thing???

1999-08-15 Thread Rick Fry

I've been all over Microsoft's site. I don't see anyplace there is one. I 
have, however, heard rumors of such a beast. Should you get a better answer 
to your message, I'd sure like to know too. Thanks.


Original Message Follows
I see that Netscape supports Linux. Does Internet Explorer support Linux
too? If so, where is the SPECIFIC web page that i go to download it? Please
don't say www.microsoft.com/download. Please be more specific than that.

Postman


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Internet Explorer for Linux? Is there such a thing???

1999-08-15 Thread Rick Fry

It's me again. This should answer your question:

Micrsoft doesn't support Internet Explorer for Linux
James Ryan

Thursday Mar 18, 1999
Occupation: PROGRAMMER
Location: TORONTO

No emotion for me. Fact is Micrsoft doesn't support Internet Explorer for 
Linux. Hence Netscape is my best choice. When Microsoft decides to give up 
their 'not invented here' syndrome and support the same platforms as 
Netscape, THEN I may switch. Until then, IE is simply not a strong enough 
reason to downgrade to Windows



Original Message Follows
I see that Netscape supports Linux. Does Internet Explorer support Linux 
too? If so, where is the SPECIFIC web page that i go to download it? Please 
don't say www.microsoft.com/download. Please be more specific than that.

Postman


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] more about partition trouble

1999-08-13 Thread Rick Fry

I didn't use the boot disks. I just told my machine to boot from the CD Rom 
and it did. Fully installed it from there.


Original Message Follows
I tried to load Linux from my boot disk, but I am not able to, If I am
unable to start the setup program to use a linux disk, how will I be able to
use disk druid or fdisk for linux???  Thanks in advance!


Nighthawk


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Linux and the modem

1999-08-13 Thread Rick Fry

As far as I'm concerned, WinModems and ALL HCF modems rate down there along 
with Rockwell's original RPI modem. Leave the processing power in the MODEM. 
Don't expect the CPU to handle the tasks. WinModems don't even work all that 
well in Windows. Why should we expect them to work at all in Linux or any 
other operating system? The only reason they're as popular as they are is 
because they're CHEAP!!! Wholesalers can buy them CHEAP and they can sell 
them to you CHEAP. Believe me, CHEAP ain't always good. I used to work for a 
fellow that had a medium priced sound system store. He had a sign that said 
"We don't mind competitors that sell their products for less. Some folks 
just don't care if the get their oats AFTER the horse has eaten them."


Original Message Follows
From: Singer XJ Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Kernal 2.4.x series will support WinModems. Linux has already called
for a
  Feature Freeze for 2.4.x in a week. Remeber. the upgrade from 2.2 to
2.4

 OK, we're freezing features in a week for 2.4, and there's currently
(even in 2.3.11) no support for Winmodems--not even a hint of it, but
it's going to be there for 2.4?  Somehow I don't think so.  Maybe over
the course of 2.4.x (that is, before we get to 2.6.x) it may be
integrated, but I doubt even that.

 Considering that each Winmodem is potentially a completely different
device, I really don't think we're going to see this any time soon--nor
do I think the developers should waste their time on it.

 XFS, OTOH, sounds seriously cool.



___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com