[newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-25 Thread Miroslav Skoric
Stephen Kuhn wrote:

Anyway, thanks for suggestions. Case there is a solution for other 
similar installations (like Netscape or like) for KDE, any pointer would 
be apreciated.

Misko
Why not just use MozillaFirebird instead?
Looks beautiful mate.
stephen kuhn - owner
Stephen, because I need both a mailer and browser here. Don't know if 
Firebird and its counterpart Firefox (or like) are in sum, say to, 
bigger than Mozilla combo of v 1.6 and regardless of that detail, is 
that worth of using a couple of them instead one product? Any opinion?

Btw, does MozillaFirebird has similar (say xft_version-related) issues 
as Mozilla combo? What about its new browser?

Misko





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-25 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 23:09, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
 Stephen Kuhn wrote:
  
 Anyway, thanks for suggestions. Case there is a solution for other 
 similar installations (like Netscape or like) for KDE, any pointer would 
 be apreciated.
 
 Misko
  
  Why not just use MozillaFirebird instead?
  Looks beautiful mate.
  
  stephen kuhn - owner
 
 Stephen, because I need both a mailer and browser here. Don't know if 
 Firebird and its counterpart Firefox (or like) are in sum, say to, 
 bigger than Mozilla combo of v 1.6 and regardless of that detail, is 
 that worth of using a couple of them instead one product? Any opinion?

I don't like Mozilla/Netscape Mail - I'm strictly an Evolution-ist
After I imported all my Windows fonts, my Netscape and Mozilla look
quite a bit better than at first - and I made sure I changed the fonts
in the preferences to suit my taste (or lack thereof).

 Btw, does MozillaFirebird has similar (say xft_version-related) issues 
 as Mozilla combo? What about its new browser?

MozillaFirebird/Firefox seems to just look damn better right from the
initial installation - so I'm biased now...it's worth a download/install
just to see what you think - and it's faster at loading/starting...

stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
--
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
--
Has your family tried 'em? POWDERMILK BISCUITS Heavens, they're tasty
and expeditious! They're made from whole wheat, to give shy persons the
strength to get up and do what needs to be done. POWDERMILK BISCUITS Buy
them ready-made in the big blue box with the picture of the biscuit on
the front, or in the brown bag with the dark stains that indicate
freshness.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-23 Thread Miroslav Skoric
Paul Smith wrote:


Why do not you consider installing the xft version of mozilla?

http://www.scottbolander.com/mozilla-xft.html
I did it right now and that version finally appeared ok (as fine as the 
'original' v 1.3). According to the site, it has something related to 
anti-aliasing enabled (or something like that). Seems that was the 
difference with 'factory' build of 1.6 version. Regardless of that, I 
checked my KDE's configuration and it seems that anti-aliasing for fonts 
was enabled as default. What makes me wonder is why it didn't work with 
the 'factory' build of 1.6 ?

In addition, you could import MS Windows truetype fonts (with drakfont), 
in case you have a dual machine (MS Windows + Linux).

Didn't have it here (yet). But on another machine, I imported MS Windows 
truetype fonts (with drakfont) - before installing xft version of 
mozilla and new fonts did not help the 1.6 factory build to look better.

I hope this helps you!

Paul

Anyway, thanks for suggestions. Case there is a solution for other 
similar installations (like Netscape or like) for KDE, any pointer would 
be apreciated.

Misko





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-23 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 09:16, Miroslav Skoric wrote:

 Anyway, thanks for suggestions. Case there is a solution for other 
 similar installations (like Netscape or like) for KDE, any pointer would 
 be apreciated.
 
 Misko

Why not just use MozillaFirebird instead?
Looks beautiful mate.

stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
--
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
--
I LIKE TO THINK I AM A PICKER-UP OF UNCONSIDERED TRIFLES. Death grinned
hopefully. (Lords and Ladies)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-23 Thread JoeHill
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:32:33 +1000
Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:

  Anyway, thanks for suggestions. Case there is a solution for other 
  similar installations (like Netscape or like) for KDE, any pointer would 
  be apreciated.
  
  Misko
 
 Why not just use MozillaFirebird instead?
 Looks beautiful mate.

'Fire*fox*', and yep, it's almost as good as p... uh, never mind.

-- 
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
Microsoft Palladium: The world is a fearful place (because we allowed it to be
by introducing vulnerable designs followed by clueless security initiatives) so
let us fix it for you. --Cringely


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-21 Thread Miroslav Skoric
John Richard Smith wrote:


Now I am not saying that the problem you are experiencing is due to this 
ongoing problem, but it may be, If you cannot get true trype fonts to 
work now maybe the problem is that they have fixed the ghostscript to 
work with the new fonts and in doing so messed up the others, I don't 
know, but in the back of my mind is a feeling that we are going to have 
trouble with fonts from now on.
Maybe that might be the case. I remember that long ago with Red Hat 6.1 
(6.2 or like) I had the similar problem but in the opposite direction. 
Those distros came with Netscape and I wanted to add some Mozilla to try 
it. You bet, although the 'original' Netscape looked fine on the screen, 
the new added Mozilla was capable to execute and run - but looked ugly.

Certainly betweenM9.0 and  M9.1 my printer had enormous trouble printing 
almost every font in kde properly, 
Haven't tested printing yet (at least seems that KDE's initial printer 
setup test was ok, as long as I remember now). Will check about.

Misko





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-21 Thread Miroslav Skoric
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:


On windoze 2k (forced to use it by my employer), I installed mozilla, then 
later netscape (can't remember why I needed netscape). Netscape stomped all 
over my mozilla settings. Trashed my bookmarks and everything (it grabbed the 
existing profile without asking me). I was quite upset. Don't know if this is 
related to your problem, but netscape does not cooperate well with mozilla on 
the same machine.
Haven't tested them both on Windows yet. What is suggested by setup 
manuals is that Netscape 6/7 and Mozilla should NOT share users' 
profiles. But I think that is true only when you try to activate both of 
software in the very same time (i.e. the other while the first is 
running). Seems that the first program started somehow 'lock' the 
profile and the other program reports that a specific profile can't be 
used. I find that resonable and, btw there's no logic to handle incoming 
email with two mailers in the same time, is it?

The other problem might be with the OS. In fact, either Netscape 7.1 and 
Mozilla 1.6 use different folder paths to be installed under Linux (per 
default), so if you follow those paths there is low chance to screw up 
things. In the same time, user's profile(s) shouldn't be changed because 
they're located in *separate* user's homes. So I don't see reasons 
something like that to be a problem.

Maybe, on Windows installations they *share* a part of 'Program Files' 
path and that could be a problem.

Misko







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-21 Thread Miroslav Skoric
JoeHill wrote:


Nothing, just an a suggestion *if you wanted the TrueType fonts*. 
 
Does it mean that the 'original' Mozilla that comes with Mdk 9.1 does 
not use TrueType fonts? It looks just fine.

Anyway, tnx for suggestion.

Misko





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-20 Thread JoeHill
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:56:00 +0200
Miroslav Skoric disseminated the following:

 I know that and in fact I did it once a couple of months ago. I did it 
 as root but somehow it screwed up my user account's behavior that I 
 couldn't resolve withouth complete re-installation from scratch. I don't 
 understand what MS fonts should solve here

Nothing, just an a suggestion *if you wanted the TrueType fonts*. 
 
  First install cabextract:
  
  urpmi cabextract
  
  then download and install/run this RPM:
  
  http://www.orderinchaos.org/msttcorefonts-bootstrap-0.1-4brs.noarch.rpm
  
  ...then just sit back and watch the magic!
 
 Would you be so kind to give me some details on what these two are 
 supposed to do. I still do not understand what the problem is, because 
 the 'original' (but a bit outdated) Mozilla 1.3 looks fine on my screen. 
 It looks to me that whatever is installed onto the original setup of Mdk 
 9.1 looks poor although being capable to run elsewhere.

These just install the TrueType fonts, not necessary at all, like I said, just a
suggestion.

-- 
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. Or ... He has
weapons of mass destruction -- the world's deadliest weapons -- which pose a
direct threat to the United States, our citizens and our friends and allies.
One of those lies got a president impeached. -- Michael Moore


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-19 Thread Miroslav Skoric
JoeHill wrote:


I did not face any setup complaint during the installation and don't 
know how to make them look better. I tested them all within KDE and 
Gnome and it is the same (anyway I prefer KDE).


...must...resist...urge...to...slag...KDE...
 
Don't understand what do you suggest me to do. As I said, additionally 
installed Mozilla and Netscape clients look poor either under Gnome and 
KDE versions of Mandrake 9.1 distribution.



Actually, you can install the TrueType fonts (which MS did *not* invent, and has
no right to claim ownership of) without a dual boot. 

I know that and in fact I did it once a couple of months ago. I did it 
as root but somehow it screwed up my user account's behavior that I 
couldn't resolve withouth complete re-installation from scratch. I don't 
understand what MS fonts should solve here

First install cabextract:

urpmi cabextract

then download and install/run this RPM:

http://www.orderinchaos.org/msttcorefonts-bootstrap-0.1-4brs.noarch.rpm

...then just sit back and watch the magic!
Would you be so kind to give me some details on what these two are 
supposed to do. I still do not understand what the problem is, because 
the 'original' (but a bit outdated) Mozilla 1.3 looks fine on my screen. 
It looks to me that whatever is installed onto the original setup of Mdk 
9.1 looks poor although being capable to run elsewhere.

Misko






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-18 Thread Miroslav Skoric
Per-Olof Litby - Reg'l Mgr - Nordic/Baltic - Java System Software - Sun
Microsystems wrote:
I've noticed that Mozilla ignores the KDE system font settings - it 
apparently uses its own font settings. The fonts used to display 
messages are easily specified in the Mozilla preferences, but how do I 
make Mozilla use the same fonts used by KDE for menus and other stuff?

Suppose that you think of Mozilla that is installed as an additional 
software (not Mozilla that comes with Mandrake). Is that a case?

I run Mdk 9.1 that comes with Moz 1.3 and recently I added Netscape 7.1 
and Mozilla 1.6 in additional. Both of them I installed using their own 
installers and I used their default values. At the end it seems they 
both run but look ugly and with hard-to-read fonts and, in general, they 
look worse than the 'original' Mozilla.

I did not face any setup complaint during the installation and don't 
know how to make them look better. I tested them all within KDE and 
Gnome and it is the same (anyway I prefer KDE).

Misko





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-18 Thread Paul Smith
I've noticed that Mozilla ignores the KDE system font settings - it 
apparently uses its own font settings. The fonts used to display 
messages are easily specified in the Mozilla preferences, but how do I 
make Mozilla use the same fonts used by KDE for menus and other stuff?
Suppose that you think of Mozilla that is installed as an additional 
software (not Mozilla that comes with Mandrake). Is that a case?

I run Mdk 9.1 that comes with Moz 1.3 and recently I added Netscape 7.1 
and Mozilla 1.6 in additional. Both of them I installed using their own 
installers and I used their default values. At the end it seems they 
both run but look ugly and with hard-to-read fonts and, in general, they 
look worse than the 'original' Mozilla.

I did not face any setup complaint during the installation and don't 
know how to make them look better. I tested them all within KDE and 
Gnome and it is the same (anyway I prefer KDE).
Why do not you consider installing the xft version of mozilla?

http://www.scottbolander.com/mozilla-xft.html

In addition, you could import MS Windows truetype fonts (with drakfont), 
in case you have a dual machine (MS Windows + Linux).

I hope this helps you!

Paul





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-18 Thread Per-Olof Litby - Reg'l Mgr Nordic/Baltic - Java System Software - Sun Microsystems
No, this is the Mozilla that came with Mandrake. Changing the fonts in 
DrakConf or desktop settings don't affekt menu and list fonts uded by 
Mozilla.

/POL

Miroslav Skoric wrote:

Per-Olof Litby - Reg'l Mgr - Nordic/Baltic - Java System Software - Sun
Microsystems wrote:
I've noticed that Mozilla ignores the KDE system font settings - it 
apparently uses its own font settings. The fonts used to display 
messages are easily specified in the Mozilla preferences, but how do 
I make Mozilla use the same fonts used by KDE for menus and other stuff?

Suppose that you think of Mozilla that is installed as an additional 
software (not Mozilla that comes with Mandrake). Is that a case?

I run Mdk 9.1 that comes with Moz 1.3 and recently I added Netscape 
7.1 and Mozilla 1.6 in additional. Both of them I installed using 
their own installers and I used their default values. At the end it 
seems they both run but look ugly and with hard-to-read fonts and, in 
general, they look worse than the 'original' Mozilla.

I did not face any setup complaint during the installation and don't 
know how to make them look better. I tested them all within KDE and 
Gnome and it is the same (anyway I prefer KDE).

Misko






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

 


begin:vcard
fn:Per-Olof Litby
n:Litby;Per-Olof
org:A HREF=http://namefinder/NameFinder?nfquery=-s+23213view=calendar;Calendar Here (Sun Only)/A/P;A HREF=http://www.sun.com/2003-0930/feature/;IMG SRC=http://www.sun.com/pics/promos/B5_100r2.gif; BORDER=0 ALT=Sun/A
adr:;;Box 51;Kista;;16494;Sweden
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Regional Mgr - Nordic/Baltic - Java System Software - Sun Microsystems
tel;work:+46 8 631-1463
tel;fax:+46 8 631-1005
tel;cell:+46 8 631-1463
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.sun.com
version:2.1
end:vcard


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-18 Thread JoeHill
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:24:44 +0200
Per-Olof Litby - Reg'l Mgr Nordic/Baltic - Java System Software - Sun 
Microsystems disseminated the following:

 No, this is the Mozilla that came with Mandrake. Changing the fonts in 
 DrakConf or desktop settings don't affekt menu and list fonts uded by 
 Mozilla.

This can be set by entering 'about:config' in the address bar, look for 'ui
font' or something like that.

The UI fonts for Mozilla, Galeon, etc. are also controlled by your Gnome config,
so KDE (bleh) settings don't affect it. One more reason to ditch KDE and use
something more efficient and less bloated, like say XFCE4, eh Stephen?

-- 
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
Saddam killed his own people, just like general Pinochet, and once upon a time
both these evil men were supported by the U.S.A.; and whisper it, even Bin Laden
once drank from America's cup just like that election down in Florida this shit
doesn't all add up.. -- Billy Bragg, 'The Price of Oil'


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Re: Mozilla fonts

2004-04-18 Thread JoeHill
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:42:11 +0100
Paul Smith disseminated the following:

  I did not face any setup complaint during the installation and don't 
  know how to make them look better. I tested them all within KDE and 
  Gnome and it is the same (anyway I prefer KDE).

...must...resist...urge...to...slag...KDE...
 
 Why do not you consider installing the xft version of mozilla?
 
 http://www.scottbolander.com/mozilla-xft.html
 
 In addition, you could import MS Windows truetype fonts (with drakfont), 
 in case you have a dual machine (MS Windows + Linux).

Actually, you can install the TrueType fonts (which MS did *not* invent, and has
no right to claim ownership of) without a dual boot. 

First install cabextract:

urpmi cabextract

then download and install/run this RPM:

http://www.orderinchaos.org/msttcorefonts-bootstrap-0.1-4brs.noarch.rpm

...then just sit back and watch the magic!

-- 
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
...we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. -- President Dwight D.
Eisenhower, in his 1961 farewell address


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com