Re: [newbie] lm-sensors/gkrellm with a laptop?
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 15:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote: I've got the Dell Inspiron 1100 and I've always used lm-sensors successfully to monitor my desktop systems but it just reports back no recognized chipsets on this model when I run (as root) sensors-detect. How and what is everyone using on their laptops? Thanks! What ver of MDK are you using? stephen kuhn - owner == illawarra computer services a kuhn media australia company http://kma.0catch.com -- * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents -- I used to be such a sweet sweet thing, 'til they got a hold of me, I opened doors for little old ladies, I helped the blind to see, I got no friends 'cause they read the papers, they can't be seen, With me, and I'm feelin' real shot down, And I'm, uh, feelin' mean, No more, Mr. Nice Guy, No more, Mr. Clean, No more, Mr. Nice Guy, They say He's sick, he's obscene. My dog bit me on the leg today, my cat clawed my eyes, Ma's been thrown out of the social circle, and Dad has to hide, I went to church, incognito, when everybody rose, The reverend Smithy, he recognized me, And punched me in the nose, he said, (chorus) He said You're sick, you're obscene. -- Alice Cooper, No More Mr. Nice Guy Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors/gkrellm with a laptop?
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 09:06, Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Sunday 02 May 2004 12:41 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: -What ver of MDK are you using? - -stephen kuhn - owner 9.2 right now, download edition. I've got the boxed 10.0 Powerpack version ordered. So after you made sure that lm_sensors was installed, you ran the sensors-detect script and choose all the defaults - yeah? Howzabout choosing the other options when doing the detect? stephen kuhn - owner == illawarra computer services a kuhn media australia company http://kma.0catch.com -- * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents -- Marriage is learning about women the hard way. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors/gkrellm with a laptop?
On Sunday 02 May 2004 07:42 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: -So after you made sure that lm_sensors was installed, you ran the -sensors-detect script and choose all the defaults - yeah? Howzabout -choosing the other options when doing the detect? - -stephen kuhn - owner If you mean did I try the ISA bus and not, and other options as well, yes. Still no go - nothing found is what was reported. -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors/gkrellm with a laptop?
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 10:39, Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Sunday 02 May 2004 07:42 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: -So after you made sure that lm_sensors was installed, you ran the -sensors-detect script and choose all the defaults - yeah? Howzabout -choosing the other options when doing the detect? - -stephen kuhn - owner If you mean did I try the ISA bus and not, and other options as well, yes. Still no go - nothing found is what was reported. ...and ya ain't been drinking this arvo, right? stephen kuhn - owner == illawarra computer services a kuhn media australia company http://kma.0catch.com -- * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents -- Year, n.: A period of three hundred and sixty-five disappointments. -- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
[newbie] lm-sensors/gkrellm with a laptop?
I've got the Dell Inspiron 1100 and I've always used lm-sensors successfully to monitor my desktop systems but it just reports back no recognized chipsets on this model when I run (as root) sensors-detect. How and what is everyone using on their laptops? Thanks! -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 19:55, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Miark lm80-i2c-0-2d Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter +5V: +4.00 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM VTT: +2.00 V (min = +1.71 V, max = +2.09 V) ALARM +3.3V: +2.54 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V) ALARM +Vcore:+0.44 V (min = +2.52 V, max = +3.08 V) ALARM +12V: +13.52 V (min = +10.80 V, max = +13.20 V) ALARM -12V: -7.08 V (min = -8.56 V, max = -6.48 V) -5V: -2.54 V (min = -3.38 V, max = -2.16 V) ALARM fan1: 10629 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) fan2: 11344 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) temp: +127.00 °C (hot:limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM (os: limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM alarms: Board temperature input (LM75) ALARM alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM Miark, your output looks extremely weird to me. Of course my data seems to be coming from a different adapter than yours. Your data says temp, but it doesn't say WHAT temp. CPU, system, ambient, what is it? The output I'm getting here seems more accurate and concise: via686a-isa-6000 Adapter: ISA adapter Algorithm: ISA algorithm CPU core: +1.74 V (min = +1.98 V, max = +2.49 V) ALARM +2.5V: +0.30 V (min = +2.24 V, max = +2.74 V) ALARM I/O: +3.35 V (min = +2.95 V, max = +3.62 V) +5V: +4.97 V (min = +4.47 V, max = +5.49 V) +12V: +12.16 V (min = +10.79 V, max = +13.18 V) CPU Fan: 5720 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) P/S Fan: 0 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) SYS Temp: +25.5°C (limit = +45°C, hysteresis = +40°C) CPU Temp: +41.2°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +55°C) SBr Temp: +22.8°C (limit = +65°C, hysteresis = +60°C) __ LX -- °°° Linux Mandrake 9.1 Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk Filter That, Beotch! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 18:10, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: CPU Fan: 5720 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) P/S Fan: 0 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) SYS Temp: +25.5°C (limit = +45°C, hysteresis = +40°C) CPU Temp: +41.2°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +55°C) SBr Temp: +22.8°C (limit = +65°C, hysteresis = +60°C) LX Dang, man...CPU temp a tad bit high...fryin'up some eggs are we? -- Tue Jul 15 18:25:00 EST 2003 18:25:01 up 1 day, 10:28, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00 - |____ |kuhn media australia| | /-oo /| |'-. |http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | || | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' |stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1+ RH 9 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586 - * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * When the ax entered the forest, the trees said, The handle is one of us! -- Turkish proverb Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] lm sensors is lying
Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Miark lm80-i2c-0-2d Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter +5V: +4.00 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM VTT: +2.00 V (min = +1.71 V, max = +2.09 V) ALARM +3.3V: +2.54 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V) ALARM +Vcore:+0.44 V (min = +2.52 V, max = +3.08 V) ALARM +12V: +13.52 V (min = +10.80 V, max = +13.20 V) ALARM -12V: -7.08 V (min = -8.56 V, max = -6.48 V) -5V: -2.54 V (min = -3.38 V, max = -2.16 V) ALARM fan1: 10629 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) fan2: 11344 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) temp: +127.00 °C (hot:limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM (os: limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM alarms: Board temperature input (LM75) ALARM alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Monday 14 July 2003 06:55 pm, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Ahh, mine looked exactly like this until Tom Brinkman stepped in and lent a hand. Try this: If you're usin 'lm80' in rc.local, try 'lm75', or vice versa. lm75 should be better for kt133 chipsets. That fixed my problem and my sensors output looked exactly like yours before I made the change. # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a Hope this helps ya. -- Regards Chris A 100% Microsoft free computer Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 7:22pm up 23 days, 1:36, 6 users, load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 09:55, Miark wrote: lm80-i2c-0-2d Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter +5V: +4.00 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM VTT: +2.00 V (min = +1.71 V, max = +2.09 V) ALARM +3.3V: +2.54 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V) ALARM +Vcore:+0.44 V (min = +2.52 V, max = +3.08 V) ALARM +12V: +13.52 V (min = +10.80 V, max = +13.20 V) ALARM -12V: -7.08 V (min = -8.56 V, max = -6.48 V) -5V: -2.54 V (min = -3.38 V, max = -2.16 V) ALARM fan1: 10629 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) fan2: 11344 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) temp: +127.00 °C (hot:limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM (os: limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM alarms: Board temperature input (LM75) ALARM alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM Firstly, I don't think your fans run at 10k+ rpm - unless it's a new fan that I ain't seen'ner'heard of yet... Secondly, are you sure you setup lm_sensors properly in the first place? It's not that it's hard, but it can be a bit confusing. You can always re-setup lm_sensors by re-running the sensors_detect script, and then following through with all the directions; I had to do this twice before it got right as I was getting basically the same BS as you just posted. Now that mine is setup properly and I know exactly how to go through with this every install, you should get something a bit more legible like the following: lm80-i2c-0-2d Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 0400 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter +5V: +3.84 V (min = +5.53 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM VTT: +1.43 V (min = +1.90 V, max = +1.67 V) ALARM +3.3V: +2.08 V (min = +3.13 V, max = +3.46 V) ALARM +Vcore:+1.27 V (min = +1.80 V, max = +1.99 V) ALARM +12V: +12.95 V (min = +11.37 V, max = +12.57 V) -12V: -6.21 V (min = -12.40 V, max = -11.20 V) -5V: -2.19 V (min = -5.16 V, max = -4.64 V) fan1: 10546 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) ALARM fan2: 6818 RPM (min = 6783 RPM, div = 1) temp: -128.00 °C (hot:limit = +6°C, hysteresis = -82°C) ALARM (os: limit = -92°C, hysteresis = -31°C) ALARM alarms: Board temperature input (LM75) ALARM alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM eeprom-i2c-0-50 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 0400 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter Memory type:SDRAM DIMM SPD Memory size (MB): 256 eeprom-i2c-0-51 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 0400 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter Memory type:SDRAM DIMM SPD Memory size (MB): 256 eeprom-i2c-0-52 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 0400 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter Memory type:SDRAM DIMM SPD Memory size (MB): 256 via686a-isa-0c00 Adapter: ISA adapter Algorithm: ISA algorithm CPU core: +1.42 V (min = +1.98 V, max = +2.49 V) ALARM +2.5V: +1.02 V (min = +2.36 V, max = +2.25 V) ALARM I/O: +3.25 V (min = +2.14 V, max = +2.86 V) ALARM +5V: +4.94 V (min = +4.92 V, max = +3.01 V) ALARM +12V: +11.74 V (min = +6.59 V, max = +10.79 V) ALARM CPU Fan: 3409 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) P/S Fan: 0 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) SYS Temp: +32.0°C (limit = +45°C, hysteresis = +40°C) CPU Temp: +30.3°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +55°C) SBr Temp: +21.4°C (limit = +65°C, hysteresis = +60°C) -- Tue Jul 15 10:25:01 EST 2003 10:25:01 up 1 day, 2:28, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.20, 0.24 - |____ |kuhn media australia| | /-oo /| |'-. |http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | || | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' |stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1+ RH 9 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586 - * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * All five-second grenade fuses will burn down in three seconds -- Murphy's Military Laws n118 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Monday 14 July 2003 06:55 pm, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Miark I forgot to add that once you make the change in rc.local rerun rc.local to have the change take effect. -- Regards Chris A 100% Microsoft free computer Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 7:52pm up 23 days, 2:06, 6 users, load average: 0.04, 0.05, 0.07 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Monday 14 July 2003 06:55 pm, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Ahh, mine looked exactly like this until Tom Brinkman stepped in and lent a hand. Try this: If you're usin 'lm80' in rc.local, try 'lm75', or vice versa. lm75 should be better for kt133 chipsets. That fixed my problem and my sensors output looked exactly like yours before I made the change. # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a Hope this helps ya. -- Regards Chris A 100% Microsoft free computer Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 7:22pm up 23 days, 1:36, 6 users, load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
Do all cpus have a sensor? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying On Monday 14 July 2003 06:55 pm, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Ahh, mine looked exactly like this until Tom Brinkman stepped in and lent a hand. Try this: If you're usin 'lm80' in rc.local, try 'lm75', or vice versa. lm75 should be better for kt133 chipsets. That fixed my problem and my sensors output looked exactly like yours before I made the change. # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a Hope this helps ya. -- Regards Chris A 100% Microsoft free computer Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 7:22pm up 23 days, 1:36, 6 users, load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: Fwd: Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
Thanks Chris and Stephen! One thing I noticed is I didn't do the ISA probe. That's already made a difference. My current reading is 61°C, which may be correct, cuz it's warm in my office, the CPU is kinda busy right now, and my box isn't cooled as well as it could be. I guess I should re-boot, check the temp in the bios when the the machine is idle, then check it against lm sensors when idle in Linux. Then if it's still wrong, I'll try Tom's lm75 trick. Miark Subject: Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:24:33 -0500 From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Monday 14 July 2003 06:55 pm, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Ahh, mine looked exactly like this until Tom Brinkman stepped in and lent a hand. Try this: If you're usin 'lm80' in rc.local, try 'lm75', or vice versa. lm75 should be better for kt133 chipsets. That fixed my problem and my sensors output looked exactly like yours before I made the change. # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a Hope this helps ya. -- Regards Chris A 100% Microsoft free computer Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 7:22pm up 23 days, 1:36, 6 users, load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14 --- -- Regards Chris A 100% Microsoft free computer Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 8:02pm up 23 days, 2:16, 6 users, load average: 0.07, 0.10, 0.09 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm sensors is lying
On Monday 14 July 2003 07:55 pm, Miark wrote: Here's my sensors output. Note the temperature of 127°C. Call me crazy (shut up, Stephen) but I think this is probably inaccurate :-) How do I fix the reading? Miark Miark, are you using Gkrellm? If you are, you can enter offsets to adjust temps, voltages, and rpms. I had to do that. All my fans were being reported at half speed. man gkrellm should point the way... -- /\ DarkLord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Friday 06 June 2003 09:37 pm, Femme wrote: Fair enough. I'll just cross my fingers then. Thanks for the in-depth info. get a temperature gun, aim Shoot @ the cpu. done deal. :D That'll work. :-) Don't know if anyone else mentioned this in this thread (if Tom B. did, I apologise), but on my Soyo Dragon MB, I have to let lmsensors use the ISA bus as well as the smbus. If I don't, I don't get all the temps/fans/voltages. -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Saturday June 7 2003 08:21 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote: Don't know if anyone else mentioned this in this thread (if Tom B. did, I apologise), but on my Soyo Dragon MB, I have to let lmsensors use the ISA bus as well as the smbus. If I don't, I don't get all the temps/fans/voltages. Nothin to apologize for Ron ;) I passed over that issue by advising to just accept the default answers during 'sensors-detect'. I still think that's a good idea, at least to start with. I have a Soyo k7vta pro, and the default answer is ISA (Industry Standard Architecture). Another friend of mine has an Abit, and has to choose SMB (System Management Bus) over the default ISA. Yours is the first mention of havin to use both I've heard. It would seem to me you'd havt'a be usin one or the other? 'Bout the only sensors-detect oddity I get is both lm75 and lm80 modules are proposed. Either one works for my board. I've come to favor lm75. IIRC (which I probly don't ;), if I put 'em both in, only one gets loaded anyhow. rc.local has, modules.conf has, modprobe i2c-viapro alias char-major-89 i2c-dev modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a -- Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Saturday 07 June 2003 11:40 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: I passed over that issue by advising to just accept the default answers during 'sensors-detect'. I still think that's a good idea, at least to start with. I have a Soyo k7vta pro, and the default answer is ISA (Industry Standard Architecture). Another friend of mine has an Abit, and has to choose SMB (System Management Bus) over the default ISA. Yours is the first mention of havin to use both I've heard. It would seem to me you'd havt'a be usin one or the other? 'Bout the only sensors-detect oddity I get is both lm75 and lm80 modules are proposed. Either one works for my board. I've come to favor lm75. IIRC (which I probly don't ;), if I put 'em both in, only one gets loaded anyhow. My mistake Tom, lmsensors asks you for a preference towards the end of its run and you do pick one or the other. If I pick smbus, I don't get temps or fans. ISA does give me all I need. rc.local has, modules.conf has, modprobe i2c-viapro alias char-major-89 i2c-dev modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a Mine rc.local looks like this: # Settings for LMsensors # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe adm1021 modprobe it87 and module.conf looks like this: alias char-major-89 i2c-dev options adm1021 ignore=0,0x4e Thanks! -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] lm-sensors
Anyone used lm-sensors? If so, what is your hardware setup? I tried to install and got a bunch of errors. http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78 - Website for LM Sensors - Eric Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Thursday 05 June 2003 02:25 pm, Eric wrote: Anyone used lm-sensors? If so, what is your hardware setup? I tried to install and got a bunch of errors. http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78 - Website for LM Sensors - Eric I'm using it here with a Soyo Dragon Plus MB. Works okay. Did you run sensors-detect and follow the instruction? -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2003 02:25 pm, Eric wrote: Anyone used lm-sensors? If so, what is your hardware setup? I tried to install and got a bunch of errors. http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78 - Website for LM Sensors - Eric I'm using it here with a Soyo Dragon Plus MB. Works okay. Did you run sensors-detect and follow the instruction? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com I didn't try sensors-detect. Once it's installed, how do you call it up? Eric Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] lm-sensors
Title: RE: [newbie] lm-sensors -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] lm-sensors Anyone used lm-sensors? If so, what is your hardware setup? I tried to install and got a bunch of errors. http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78 - Website for LM Sensors - Eric What version of Mandrake are you running and what type of MoBo? Just asking, cause the board has to support the sensors. lm-sensors is on the 9.1 d/l version also. Listed as lm_sensors and once you have installed the rpm go to command line and type in sensors-detect and follow the instructions from there. If your board does not have sensors you will not get final scripts to insert in etc/rc.d/local and etc/modules.conf HTH, Dennis M.
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
In terminal type su then give the root password, next type sensors-detect then follw the questions. ;-) Mike Eric wrote: Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2003 02:25 pm, Eric wrote: Anyone used lm-sensors? If so, what is your hardware setup? I tried to install and got a bunch of errors. http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78 - Website for LM Sensors - Eric I'm using it here with a Soyo Dragon Plus MB. Works okay. Did you run sensors-detect and follow the instruction? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com I didn't try sensors-detect. Once it's installed, how do you call it up? Eric Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Friday June 6 2003 12:57 pm, Richard Urwin wrote: Hijacking the thread to ask a quickie question for someone that knows: Does the (500MHz) Slot A Athlon have temperature sensors? There's nothing in BIOS, but I've just installed a quiet PC CPU fan and would like to keep an eye on it. Well, it's on topic for the subject so it's hardly hijacking Richard ;) Sensor support, hardware monitoring must be present in the motherboard and bios. It's not cpu dependant. It is cpu enhanced tho. Older AMD's can only be sort'a temp monitored by a probe (thermistor) on or in the cpu socket, or from a cpu pin to report the processors external temp. From a pin is better, but not by much. AMD XP's made after last June have an internal diode, but a lot of motherboards don't support it. A probe is still used. Intel's have long had an internal diode to directly report the cpu's core temp, and consequently most all boards do support it. A probe temp is always 10C to 20C degrees less than the cpu's actual core temp, really just a guesstimate. The saving grace is that AMD's can stand high heat better than Intels, by around 30C. Boards/bios' support monitoring thru the i2c/SMB bus. A lot of ready mades (Dell, Gateway, Compaq, etc) use to cut out this bus (chip) for their proprietary OEM ONLY SPEC boards to save a buck. I'm not sure if they still do tho, as more users become aware of monitoring's benefits. If you don't see any temps, voltages, fan speeds in bios, it's almost a given the motherboard/bios doesn't support it. All lm_sensors does is read the monitoring the bios is doin from the i2c bus on the motherboard. -- Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Friday 06 Jun 2003 8:17 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: If you don't see any temps, voltages, fan speeds in bios, it's almost a given the motherboard/bios doesn't support it. Fair enough. I'll just cross my fingers then. Thanks for the in-depth info. -- Richard Urwin Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 03:57, Richard Urwin wrote: Hijacking the thread to ask a quickie question for someone that knows: Does the (500MHz) Slot A Athlon have temperature sensors? There's nothing in BIOS, but I've just installed a quiet PC CPU fan and would like to keep an eye on it. Answer: Yes. -- Sat Jun 7 08:50:01 EST 2003 08:50:01 up 2 days, 9:43, 3 users, load average: 0.14, 0.14, 0.10 - |____ |kuhn media australia| | /-oo /| |'-. |http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | || | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' |stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1 RH 7.3 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586 - * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * True happiness will be found only in true love. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Friday 06 Jun 2003 11:52 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 03:57, Richard Urwin wrote: Hijacking the thread to ask a quickie question for someone that knows: Does the (500MHz) Slot A Athlon have temperature sensors? There's nothing in BIOS, but I've just installed a quiet PC CPU fan and would like to keep an eye on it. Answer: Yes. Thanks, given that there is no mention of them in the BIOS, would it be worth my while to install lm-sensors? -- Richard Urwin Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] lm-sensors
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 16:19, Richard Urwin wrote: On Friday 06 Jun 2003 8:17 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: If you don't see any temps, voltages, fan speeds in bios, it's almost a given the motherboard/bios doesn't support it. Fair enough. I'll just cross my fingers then. Thanks for the in-depth info. get a temperature gun, aim Shoot @ the cpu. done deal. :D -- Femme *** *Using Evolution on * *Mandrake 9.1 Loving it!* *Suck it M$hit! OWNED! * *** Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] lm-sensors
I instaled lm-sensors and configured it with sensors-detect, but I hardly believe the output is correct or if it is even sensing real values from the motherboard. I'm on an Athlon 1000 mhz system with a Asus A7V233 motherboard, 256 megs of ram. I'm not a real techie when it comes to hardware but here's the output from sensors: [rootm206-157 root]# sensors as99127f-i2c-0-2d Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at e800 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter VCore 1: +1.82 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.93 V) VCore 2: +0.11 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.93 V) ALARM +3.3V: +3.53 V (min = +3.13 V, max = +3.45 V) ALARM +5V: +5.02 V (min = +4.72 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +12.31 V (min = +10.79 V, max = +13.19 V) -12V: -12.08 V (min = -13.19 V, max = -10.73 V) -5V: -5.42 V (min = -5.24 V, max = -4.74 V) ALARM fan1: 5443 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) fan2: 4856 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) fan3: 2732 RPM (min = 3000 RPM, div = 2) ALARM temp1: +28°C (limit = +60°C) temp2: +42.8°C (limit = +67°C, hysteresis = +60°C) temp3:+112.2°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +50°C) vid: +1.850 V alarms: beep_enable: Sound alarm enabled That's with setiathome running and more or less normal everything else. I ran cpuburn for a while and didn't see the temp2 raise more than 1/10 of a degree C. And that +112.5 isn't even plausible. Being non-metric, I usually don't think too well in Celsius degrees, but a quick calculation on my trusty HP says the first temp is 82.4 degrees Fahrenheit; the second is roughly 109 degrees Fahrenheit. I seem to remember that it shouldn't get over 60 degrees Celsius, and I've heard that on Athlon's particularly, the read temperature is inaccurate to begin with, and you need to add ca. 10 degrees to get a ballpark CPU temperature. AFAIK my box has not overheated although there was one time when the internal (i.e., BIOS) setup detected what might have been an overheat and then promptly shut things down. (I was doing something video-related at that time.) Anyway, my system has three case fans in addition to the motherboard fan, and obviously the fan on the CPU is there. My ;/etc/modules.conf file: probeall scsi_hostadapter aic7xxx alias eth0 tulip above snd-emu10k1 snd-pcm-oss alias sound-slot-0 emu10k1 probeall usb-interface usb-uhci options snd_enable=1 alias char-major-178 mga_vid options snd_enable=1 options snd_enable=1 options snd_max_buffer_size=2 snd_enable=1 (no sensors stuff there?) I figured that's where it would put it. Some lines from 'cat /proc/modules' [rootm206-157 etc]# cat /proc/modules w83781d19504 0 (unused) i2c-proc7088 0 [w83781d] i2c-isa 1224 0 (unused) i2c-viapro 3920 0 (unused) i2c-dev 4420 0 i2c-core 15332 0 [w83781d i2c-proc i2c-isa i2c-viapro i2c-dev] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] lm sensors....
X-RebelTech Is Here: http://www.rebeltech.ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit has anyone using abit bp6 noticed that the voltage values shown while using lm sensors and gkrellm are weird? do i just have to figure out the multipliers? is this normal for every board? for example, the -12 doesn't show anything remotely close to -12. i actually measured it and it is pretty much dead on, so not a problem that way, just a matter of setting it up i suppose. my board had the winbond W83781d chip detected. any thoughts? moose Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
