Re: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-08 Thread SpeedMan

On June  8, 2001 08:55 am, you wrote:

 Question, in the machines mentioned below did you use the 80wire connection
 cables on your hard drives or the old standard 40 wire cables? From what I
 have read on the net this can become an issue with CDROM drives and via
 chipsets if the 40wire cables are used.

SNIP

Excellent point Dennis.  You are absolutely correct - standard IDE cables are 
a problem when used w/ VIA based Socket A motherboards.

The systems I detailed earlier are my own personal equipment, and run high 
speed IDE cables on all controllers.

My experience w/ SA/VIA boards goes beyond this though, as I own a small OEM 
and ship approx. 30 to 40 SA/VIA systems per month.  We first started 
noticing problems late last summer - regardless of O/S - when running burners 
on the secondary master w/ standard cables.  As soon as we switched to high 
speed IDE cables read/write errors disappeared.

So, without a question I would recommend only using high speed IDE cables on 
SA/VIA based systems.


Regards,

SpeedMan




Re: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-08 Thread civileme

On Friday 08 June 2001 09:38, SpeedMan wrote:
 On June  8, 2001 08:55 am, you wrote:
  Question, in the machines mentioned below did you use the 80wire
  connection cables on your hard drives or the old standard 40 wire cables?
  From what I have read on the net this can become an issue with CDROM
  drives and via chipsets if the 40wire cables are used.

 SNIP

 Excellent point Dennis.  You are absolutely correct - standard IDE cables
 are a problem when used w/ VIA based Socket A motherboards.

 The systems I detailed earlier are my own personal equipment, and run high
 speed IDE cables on all controllers.

 My experience w/ SA/VIA boards goes beyond this though, as I own a small
 OEM and ship approx. 30 to 40 SA/VIA systems per month.  We first started
 noticing problems late last summer - regardless of O/S - when running
 burners on the secondary master w/ standard cables.  As soon as we switched
 to high speed IDE cables read/write errors disappeared.

 So, without a question I would recommend only using high speed IDE cables
 on SA/VIA based systems.


 Regards,

 SpeedMan


OK--do this

Put two disk drives on different channels on a 686B southbridge board

Activate DMA .  Our kernel won't, so load kernel-linus2.4 or use another 2.4 
distro or even win2K.

copy a partition of at least 100 Mb between them.

Try a diff.  This error seems VERY reproducible.  If it is reproducible here, 
it makes one wonder about other problems.  (I have experienced several 
myself, and I used to swear by VIA).


http://www.au-ja.de/review-kt133a-1-en.html

But also, now a bug in the KT133A Northbridge has been confirmed.  
Information on the bugs and the _fixes_ are at that site.  The good news is 
that there are fixes.  The bad news is that I will have a difficult time 
trusting again, and so will many others.  Even those who have had clean 
records may have just been dodging a hidden bullet.

http://www.neoseeker.com/forums/index.php?fn=view_threadt=3394

Was VIA's official statement.  The original testers did state the problem was 
_exacerbated_ by the presence of a Creative Sound Card, but also were able to 
show the bug without it.

http://www.au-ja.de/review-kt133a-2-en.html

They show a do-it-yourself patch for systems without creative soundcards.  
They also say that the problem can occur with ANY PCI cards that generate DMA 
traffic and may even occur without it.

Well I have watched Seagate ST34xxxA and ST38421A drives freeze solid on boot 
with RH and Caldera and Mandrake 6.0 on a VIA MVP3.  I have watched warm 
reboots fail on FIC boards using KT133 with a nice Duron (I have two dead 
KT133 boards in my collection, they simply stopped powering up though the 
memory and all the cards and the processor were fine on other systems), so my 
experience with VIA has been clouded with failures.  The same could be said 
for some others, like older PCChips boards, and the newer ASUS boards (when 
did they start soldering in the BIOS--is someone new in ownership who decided 
to cash in on the excellent ASUS reputation?).  The fact is, you can't tell 
much any more by brand name.  You pays your money and you takes your chances. 
 When has it ever been different?

Probably VIA Chipsets will be better designed and less underpriced than in 
the past, because of this huge scare.  Still those who lost their work will 
probably harbor bitterness for a long time, even though people repeat often 
that Data Not Backed Up is Data Lost.

Civileme






Re: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-08 Thread Van winssen Ramaakers


 The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge.  This means most
 modern KT133As and Apollo Pros.  That is a large portion of the Motherboard
 Market


That's nice to read, I recently bought Abit a KT7A. :~( 
I should have known this before...
What disadvantages did I get, Civileme?

My LG 8120B DVD-drive is installed as a normal CD-rom drive, has it something 
to do with that?
Can someone tell me how to change it to a DVD-drive as it is supposed to be? 
Or a direct link where to find info about how to do this? 
The DVD playing HOWTO was not very helpful yet.
I will copy a piece of my /etc/fstab down here.
/mnt/cdrom is my LG DVD, and /mnt/cdrom2 is my ide burner

/mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom supermount fs=iso9660,dev=/dev/cdrom 0 0
/mnt/cdrom2 /mnt/cdrom2 supermount fs=iso9660,dev=/dev/cdrom2 0 0
/mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy supermount fs=vfat,dev=/dev/fd0 0 0

Gerard 




Re: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-08 Thread Walter Luffman

On Friday 08 June 2001 12:18 pm, Mark Stewart wrote:
   The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge.  This means most
   modern KT133As and Apollo Pros.  That is a large portion of the
 
  Motherboard
 
   Market

 Really? I bought a Tyan Trinity 400 S1854 specifically to run Mandrake. 
 The spec sheets lists the chipset as VIA Apollo Pro 133A (VT82C694X 
 VT82C596A). I'm guesssing the latter two identifiers are the north and
 southbridge. If so am I safe?

 It's been running Mandrake 7.2 quite reliably so far...

I have the same motherboard; I've successfully run Manrake 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 and 
now 8.0 on it, as well as a few other distributions.  Also Windows 98 and 
98SE with no motherboard-related problems AFAIK, although Windows has enough 
problems of its own that a mobo-related bug could easily go unnoticed.

 In this vein, it would be really great if Mandrake were to start listing
 motherboards along with the rest of the hardware compatible lists. The
 comments people have made to the effect of VIA is well known for having
 problems are somewhat exasperating to folks like myself who researched
 their purchases heavily yet still apparently made the wrong choices because
 they didn't also read the kernel dev mailing list.

I like this idea!  It may be that some motherboards with the problematic 
VIA chipsets somehow avoid those problems, which would suggest that the 
problems occur only when the chipsets are combined with other components in a 
particular manner.  IOW, it may be the overall design of the motherboard 
that's the culprit, and not necessarily the particular chipset.
-- 
Walter Luffman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Medina, TN USA
Supercharged with extra glucose! (Type 2 diabetic 5/99, d/e/m)
Sage, purple 1998 Honda VT1100C Shadow Spirit




RE: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-08 Thread Hans N.

Warning: this is off topic for the list.

 Speedman wrote
On top of that even w/ only loading the drivers I have seen a number of
machines stop booting until the Creative card was removed.

I have a Compaq 7471 that I have done a lot of hardware upgrading to. About
2 weeks ago I attempted to reinstall the Compaq software and Win98 CDs that
accompany my computer. Well, I had so many problems trying to get it to
install, after I opened up my box and set up the hardware to mimic the
factory condition it came as. Eventually the install program wouldn't even
attempt to run. So I figured what the heck and bought the standard WinME so
I could stop opening up my system and just install the friggin Windows OS.
Well it installed fine, I did have to disconnect my second hard drive, but
not a biggie for me. Well every so often when first installing the major
software components (Voodoo 5500 software, SB Live! Platinum, Adaptec Easy
CD 4) WinME wouldn't boot up. It would stop at the WinME logo just before
it. So I'd reinstall, and reinstall, and reinstall everything. I narrowed it
down to my Creative SB Live hardware. Win98 never gave me problems with it
and my oboard audio. After about a week of reinstalling various software,
including WinME, I found out I had to make my onboard soundcard disabled in
the profile as well as keep it from existing in any hardware profiles before
it would work. No, this answer was not posted on creative's site, but a
different problem posted gave me the idea. During the past two weeks for at
least three times a day I thought to myself, Linux works just fine, Linux
doesn't do that. The moral of the story, so long as the hardware is
supported, Linux works just fine, Linux doesn't do that :^)

Sincerely and respectfully,
Hans N.





RE: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-08 Thread Mark Stewart



  The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge.  This means most
  modern KT133As and Apollo Pros.  That is a large portion of the
 Motherboard
  Market


Really? I bought a Tyan Trinity 400 S1854 specifically to run Mandrake.  The
spec sheets lists the chipset as VIA Apollo Pro 133A (VT82C694X 
VT82C596A). I'm guesssing the latter two identifiers are the north and
southbridge. If so am I safe?

It's been running Mandrake 7.2 quite reliably so far...

In this vein, it would be really great if Mandrake were to start listing
motherboards along with the rest of the hardware compatible lists. The
comments people have made to the effect of VIA is well known for having
problems are somewhat exasperating to folks like myself who researched
their purchases heavily yet still apparently made the wrong choices because
they didn't also read the kernel dev mailing list.

::mark







Re: [newbie] Motherboard inquiry

2001-06-07 Thread Civileme

On Thursday 07 June 2001 19:20, s wrote:
 Seems I have to replace my mobo, an Abit SE6 due to a blown ps/2 port and
 can't hold out the 2 or 3 weeks for warranty service.  So, which chipset is
 it that we should avoid?

 I'd like to continue to use my current hardware which is exclusively ide,
 sdram 133 and pIII cpu.  Any suggestions for a good one (mobo or chipset)?
 Asus and Abit have done messed up on me, but I have an open mind...  :-)
 I've had pretty good luck with biostar, what do you think about them?
 TIA,
 -s


Look for Shuttle (www.spacewalker.com) with an SiS630 chipset.  It will 
accommodate your current hardware and nothing is more linux-friendly.  It 
does have a very nice on-board 3D graphics and GPL drivers for everything but 
the possibly included PCTel Linmodem are on the SiS site and GPLed.  The 
PCTel driver is not GPL.

The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge.  This means most 
modern KT133As and Apollo Pros.  That is a large portion of the Motherboard 
Market

There is also a Matsonic with the SiS 630 chipset,  MS7308E, and perhaps some 
from Amptron or PCChips (and their quality seems to have risen recently 
though I used to hate them).

Naturally most Intel Chipsets, except the 820, are probably OK.  

The SiS 630 and 730 and the Intel GX chipsets are the ones where the BIOS can 
be directly replaced by linux

Boot to framebuffer X in 3 seconds, anyone?

Civileme