RE: [linux] Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-29 Thread Richard Urwin
 Overall, though, I'm still perplexed over the entire desktop war bit
-
 linux is an OS that allows you to have YOUR OWN CUSTOMIZED DESKTOP -
but
 unless you're a bit adept at customizing, you're stuck with mainstream
 desktop environments  - almost like in the Windows world - which I
 despise.

This seems like a good time and place to ask what is a desktop
environment? As opposed to a window manager. From an X windows point of
view as well as from a user point of view.

-- Confused of Kettering (Leicester actually)

--
Richard Urwin, Private
No 9000 series computer has ever made a mitsake or corrubiteddatatato.



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [linux] Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-29 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 20:28, Richard Urwin wrote:
  Overall, though, I'm still perplexed over the entire desktop war bit
 -
  linux is an OS that allows you to have YOUR OWN CUSTOMIZED DESKTOP -
 but
  unless you're a bit adept at customizing, you're stuck with mainstream
  desktop environments  - almost like in the Windows world - which I
  despise.
 
 This seems like a good time and place to ask what is a desktop
 environment? As opposed to a window manager. From an X windows point of
 view as well as from a user point of view.
 
 -- Confused of Kettering (Leicester actually)
 
 --
 Richard Urwin, Private
 No 9000 series computer has ever made a mitsake or corrubiteddatatato.
 

Window Manager - handles the XWindows
Desktop Environment - Window Manager plus icons on desktop, window-tips
standard, standard widgets and pipes...etc...

When you use a window manager you're using all sorts of programs
hither thither and yon...when you're using a desktop environment, you
can basically copy/paste data, pipe data easily from one program to the
next, have all your programs looking basically the same...

KDE is a complete desktop environment.
Gnome is a complete desktop environment.
CDE is a desktop environment.
XIMIAN is a desktop environment.

XFCE is a window manager (with extras)
Blackbox is a window manager.
Enlightenment is a window manager.
WindowMaker is a window manager.

...does that sort it out a tad bit better?

-- 
Fri Nov 29 22:35:00 EST 2002
   .o0 linux user:267497 0o.

|____  | kühn media australia
|   /  \ /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com
|  .\__/ || |   |  | 
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kühn
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  |/ ._/  || |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808
|  ;/ / | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389
|  '  `-`'   | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU

Coralament*Best Grötens*Liebe Grüße*Best Regards*Elkorajn Salutojn

Gay shlafen:  Yiddish for go to sleep.

Now doesn't gay shlafen have a softer, more soothing sound than the
harsh, staccato go to sleep?  Listen to the difference:
Go to sleep, you little wretch! ... Gay shlafen, darling.
Obvious, isn't it?
Clearly the best thing you can do for you children is to start
speaking Yiddish right now and never speak another word of English as
long as you live.  This will, of course, entail teaching Yiddish to all
your friends, business associates, the people at the supermarket, and
so on, but that's just the point.  It has to start with committed
individuals and then grow
Some minor adjustments will have to be made, of course: those
signs written in what look like Yiddish letters won't be funny when
everything is written in Yiddish.  And we'll have to start driving on
the left side of the road so we won't be reading the street signs
backwards.  But is that too high a price to pay for world peace?
I think not, my friend, I think not.
-- Arthur Naiman, Every Goy's Guide to Yiddish


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-28 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 28 Nov 2002 5:32 am, Len Lawrence wrote:
.  As you point out other distributions
 would also adopt Gnome 2 so there would be no advantage in switching
 loyalties.

Glad to see that those more knowledgeable are helping you to eradicate the 
problems.  Good luck

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 27 Nov 2002 12:35 pm, Len Lawrence wrote:

 What this means is that Mandrake has lost a customer, and others will
 vote with their feet as well unless Mandrake or somebody influential
 applies pressure on the Gnomes to change their heading.  By my calculation
 they are at least 90 degrees off course.

 I shall buy the 8.2 Power Pack, as a last gesture of support for Mandrake.
 But that is the end, finish, no more.

 Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.

Not offended - but puzzled.  If your quarrel  is with Gnome, why punish 
Mandrake?  OK, so you don't like KDE, but surely there's another wm that you 
could be happy with?  And if Gnome is the problem, won't it be so in any 
other distro?

I hope it was just frustration talking, and that you will re-consider.

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Meliton
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:35, Len Lawrence wrote: 
 
 This is what I found:
   Double-clicks all over the place - I HATE doubleclicking.

Open Nautilus. Go to Edit | Preferences. Under Iconlist views you find
click behaviour. It affects both Nautilus and the desktop icons. 

   No sloppy-focus aka focus-follows-mouse.

In the menu, go to Gnome control center. Click on Window focus, and
you'll find what you're looking for. 


   User cannot place images on the root window without going 
   through Nautilus/MetaCity.  They get hidden by the window 
   manager's own backgrounds.  Now, for years I have been 
   compiling a collection of scanned calendar images (landscapes)
   and astronomical vistas which I have been able to use as
   wallpaper at whim, using my own little menu program.  I resent
   being forced to jump through hoops to do something simple - it
   is so Redmond don't you agree.

You can copy your images to ~/.gnome-desktop 


   The font rendering leaves a lot to be desired.  This is the
   first time fonts have ever been a problem, always crisp and
   clear in both RedHat and Mandrake.  No doubt one can improve
   them.

I agree completely on this. 

   Icons all over the desktop.  I dislike floating icons and 
   usually remove them immediately, preferring to invoke applications
   from the panel (with a single click!).  And, this is the worst
   bit.  The icons are all owned by root!  A user cannot edit the
   preferences, or delete the icon. 

I haven't actually done this, but you could remove your icons from
~/.gnome-desktop. Mine are owned by my user. 

 For pity's sake, what are the
   Gnome developers smoking?

Ask them, it's sure to be good ;) 

   There appears to be no way to specify the number of workspaces;
   I normally have 6, the default is 4.  I suspect that there is
   somewhere that this can be done, as root no doubt.

Right click on the workspace switcher, click Prederences. You can have
as many as you wish. 

 Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.

Not at all, mate. I have my own issues with the desktop, but I suspect
it's more a Mdk than a Gnome problem for me. Keep rockin'. 

Meliton. 







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Miark
Len,

If Gnome is the problem, leaving Mandrake won't help because all other
modern distros will use Gnome2 as well. Moving to a new distro would be
a pain and wouldn't get you anywhere, and moving to Winsux is out of 
the question. So what are your options?

Miark



On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:35:54 +
Len Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Well, that's it.  No more Mandrake.  Linux Format provided 9.0 on DVD
 this month, so I gave it a go.  Installation on my old Pentium III was
 totally painless, and DVDs are definitely the way to go.  Then up came
 the user interface and what a nasty shock that was!  I had seen
 complaints on the list about Nautilus and MetaCity but I had not
 imagined how bad Gnome 2 was.  A giant leap backwards.  All the
 freedom and functionality that I had been enjoying for six years
 suddenly gone.  Simply put, I cannot live with that interface.  My
 needs are few, but I insist on having control over my own desktop.
 The Gnome developers have completely lost the plot.  For people who
 must have a Windows style environment KDE was designed for them.  I
 would never use it, have never liked Windows.  
 
 This is what I found:
   Double-clicks all over the place - I HATE doubleclicking.
   No sloppy-focus aka focus-follows-mouse.
   User cannot place images on the root window without going 
   through Nautilus/MetaCity.  They get hidden by the window 
   manager's own backgrounds.  Now, for years I have been 
   compiling a collection of scanned calendar images (landscapes)
   and astronomical vistas which I have been able to use as
   wallpaper at whim, using my own little menu program.  I resent
   being forced to jump through hoops to do something simple - it
   is so Redmond don't you agree.
   The font rendering leaves a lot to be desired.  This is the
   first time fonts have ever been a problem, always crisp and
   clear in both RedHat and Mandrake.  No doubt one can improve
   them.
   Icons all over the desktop.  I dislike floating icons and 
   usually remove them immediately, preferring to invoke applications
   from the panel (with a single click!).  And, this is the worst
   bit.  The icons are all owned by root!  A user cannot edit the
   preferences, or delete the icon.  For pity's sake, what are the
   Gnome developers smoking?
   There appears to be no way to specify the number of workspaces;
   I normally have 6, the default is 4.  I suspect that there is
   somewhere that this can be done, as root no doubt.
 
 What this means is that Mandrake has lost a customer, and others will 
 vote with their feet as well unless Mandrake or somebody influential
 applies pressure on the Gnomes to change their heading.  By my calculation 
 they are at least 90 degrees off course.
 
 I shall buy the 8.2 Power Pack, as a last gesture of support for Mandrake.
 But that is the end, finish, no more.
 
 Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.
 -- 
 Len Lawrence
 
 
 
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 23:35, Len Lawrence wrote:
 Well, that's it.  No more Mandrake.  Linux Format provided 9.0 on DVD
 this month, so I gave it a go.  Installation on my old Pentium III was
 totally painless, and DVDs are definitely the way to go.  Then up came
 the user interface and what a nasty shock that was!  I had seen
 complaints on the list about Nautilus and MetaCity but I had not
 imagined how bad Gnome 2 was.  A giant leap backwards.  All the
 freedom and functionality that I had been enjoying for six years
 suddenly gone.  Simply put, I cannot live with that interface.  My
 needs are few, but I insist on having control over my own desktop.
 The Gnome developers have completely lost the plot.  For people who
 must have a Windows style environment KDE was designed for them.  I
 would never use it, have never liked Windows.  
 
 This is what I found:
   Double-clicks all over the place - I HATE doubleclicking.
   No sloppy-focus aka focus-follows-mouse.
   User cannot place images on the root window without going 
   through Nautilus/MetaCity.  They get hidden by the window 
   manager's own backgrounds.  Now, for years I have been 
   compiling a collection of scanned calendar images (landscapes)
   and astronomical vistas which I have been able to use as
   wallpaper at whim, using my own little menu program.  I resent
   being forced to jump through hoops to do something simple - it
   is so Redmond don't you agree.
   The font rendering leaves a lot to be desired.  This is the
   first time fonts have ever been a problem, always crisp and
   clear in both RedHat and Mandrake.  No doubt one can improve
   them.
   Icons all over the desktop.  I dislike floating icons and 
   usually remove them immediately, preferring to invoke applications
   from the panel (with a single click!).  And, this is the worst
   bit.  The icons are all owned by root!  A user cannot edit the
   preferences, or delete the icon.  For pity's sake, what are the
   Gnome developers smoking?
   There appears to be no way to specify the number of workspaces;
   I normally have 6, the default is 4.  I suspect that there is
   somewhere that this can be done, as root no doubt.
 
 What this means is that Mandrake has lost a customer, and others will 
 vote with their feet as well unless Mandrake or somebody influential
 applies pressure on the Gnomes to change their heading.  By my calculation 
 they are at least 90 degrees off course.
 
 I shall buy the 8.2 Power Pack, as a last gesture of support for Mandrake.
 But that is the end, finish, no more.
 
 Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.
 -- 
 Len Lawrence

Just to let ya know, GNOME is REMOVABLE - I did it. I HATE Gnome2, so I
removed it altogether, then dug out my trusty GNOME 1.4 and installed it
instead. MetaCity is NOT worth even mentioning, let alone using. Sawfish
is better by far. BTW, Gnome is trying to correct the errors of their
ways...

But overall, the KDE side of MDK ain't all that bad...and you do get
Enlightenment, WindowMaker and the ability to put more on...

-- 
Thu Nov 28 15:20:00 EST 2002
   .o0 linux user:267497 0o.

|____  | kühn media australia
|   /  \ /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com
|  .\__/ || |   |  | 
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kühn
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  |/ ._/  || |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808
|  ;/ / | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389
|  '  `-`'   | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU

Coralament*Best Grötens*Liebe Grüße*Best Regards*Elkorajn Salutojn

Everyone can be taught to sculpt: Michelangelo would have had to be
taught how ___not to.  So it is with the great programmers.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 28 Nov 2002 15:26:37 +1100, Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 23:35, Len Lawrence wrote:
  Well, that's it.  No more Mandrake.  Linux Format provided 9.0 on DVD
  this month, so I gave it a go.  Installation on my old Pentium III was
  totally painless, and DVDs are definitely the way to go.  Then up came
  the user interface and what a nasty shock that was!  I had seen
  complaints on the list about Nautilus and MetaCity but I had not
  imagined how bad Gnome 2 was.  A giant leap backwards.  All the
  freedom and functionality that I had been enjoying for six years
  suddenly gone.  Simply put, I cannot live with that interface.  My
  needs are few, but I insist on having control over my own desktop.
  The Gnome developers have completely lost the plot.  For people who
  must have a Windows style environment KDE was designed for them.  I
  would never use it, have never liked Windows.  
  
  This is what I found:
  Double-clicks all over the place - I HATE doubleclicking.
  No sloppy-focus aka focus-follows-mouse.
  User cannot place images on the root window without going 
  through Nautilus/MetaCity.  They get hidden by the window 
  manager's own backgrounds.  Now, for years I have been 
  compiling a collection of scanned calendar images (landscapes)
  and astronomical vistas which I have been able to use as
  wallpaper at whim, using my own little menu program.  I resent
  being forced to jump through hoops to do something simple - it
  is so Redmond don't you agree.
  The font rendering leaves a lot to be desired.  This is the
  first time fonts have ever been a problem, always crisp and
  clear in both RedHat and Mandrake.  No doubt one can improve
  them.
  Icons all over the desktop.  I dislike floating icons and 
  usually remove them immediately, preferring to invoke applications
  from the panel (with a single click!).  And, this is the worst
  bit.  The icons are all owned by root!  A user cannot edit the
  preferences, or delete the icon.  For pity's sake, what are the
  Gnome developers smoking?
  There appears to be no way to specify the number of workspaces;
  I normally have 6, the default is 4.  I suspect that there is
  somewhere that this can be done, as root no doubt.
  
  What this means is that Mandrake has lost a customer, and others will 
  vote with their feet as well unless Mandrake or somebody influential
  applies pressure on the Gnomes to change their heading.  By my calculation 
  they are at least 90 degrees off course.
  
  I shall buy the 8.2 Power Pack, as a last gesture of support for Mandrake.
  But that is the end, finish, no more.
  
  Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.
  -- 
  Len Lawrence
 
 Just to let ya know, GNOME is REMOVABLE - I did it. I HATE Gnome2, so I
 removed it altogether, then dug out my trusty GNOME 1.4 and installed it
 instead. MetaCity is NOT worth even mentioning, let alone using. Sawfish
 is better by far. BTW, Gnome is trying to correct the errors of their
 ways...
 
 But overall, the KDE side of MDK ain't all that bad...and you do get
 Enlightenment, WindowMaker and the ability to put more on...

GNOME is not the problem, you just need to know how to configure it. Nobody is
forcing you to use Metacity. In fact, Sawfish is still the official WM of the
GNOME Project, at least for the time being. I use Sawfish instead of Metacity in
GNOME. Nautilus' management of the desktop can be turned off in its preferences,
leaving you with a bare desktop. You don't need to be root to alter any GNOME
settings.

So with that said, what exactly is wrong with GNOME2 that pushed you back to
GNOME1? I have found GNOME2 to be leagues ahead of its predecessor. It is not
quite as functional yet, but no doubt it will get there soon. It is already much
faster and easier to use.


-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan
  [Yama | http://www.pclinuxonline.com/]

If you have any trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to show you
how it's done. -- Scott Adams


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Len Lawrence
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:09:48 -0500
Miark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Len,
 
 If Gnome is the problem, leaving Mandrake won't help because all other
 modern distros will use Gnome2 as well. Moving to a new distro would be
 a pain and wouldn't get you anywhere, and moving to Winsux is out of 
 the question. So what are your options?
 
 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:35:54 +
 Len Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Well, that's it.  No more Mandrake.  Linux Format provided 9.0 on DVD
 --- a load more snipped 
Freeze at 8.2 and lose out on later developments.
-- 
Len Lawrence




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Len Lawrence
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:22:02 +
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wednesday 27 Nov 2002 12:35 pm, Len Lawrence wrote:
 
  What this means is that Mandrake has lost a customer, and others will
  vote with their feet as well unless Mandrake or somebody influential
  applies pressure on the Gnomes to change their heading.  By my calculation
  they are at least 90 degrees off course.
 
  I shall buy the 8.2 Power Pack, as a last gesture of support for Mandrake.
  But that is the end, finish, no more.
 
  Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.
 
 Not offended - but puzzled.  If your quarrel  is with Gnome, why punish 
 Mandrake?  OK, so you don't like KDE, but surely there's another wm that you 
 could be happy with?  And if Gnome is the problem, won't it be so in any 
 other distro?
 
 I hope it was just frustration talking, and that you will re-consider.
 
Not punishing Mandrake - no way.  Just feel that they should go back to Gnome 1.4
until the Gnome people get their act together.  These people, Gnomes and Mandrake
work very hard to supply first class free software but in this case they seem to 
have misjudged the market.  Gnome 1.4 + Sawfish were perfect for my needs.  Why
not supply this combination as an alternative?  The answer to that is they
don't have the resources to maintain two parallel environments.  As you point out
other distributions would also adopt Gnome 2 so there would be no advantage in
switching loyalties.

-- 
Len Lawrence




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Len Lawrence
On 27 Nov 2002 21:29:11 +0100
Meliton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:35, Len Lawrence wrote: 
  
  This is what I found:
  Double-clicks all over the place - I HATE doubleclicking.
 
 Open Nautilus. Go to Edit | Preferences. Under Iconlist views you find
 click behaviour. It affects both Nautilus and the desktop icons. 
 
  No sloppy-focus aka focus-follows-mouse.
 
 In the menu, go to Gnome control center. Click on Window focus, and
 you'll find what you're looking for. 
 
 
  User cannot place images on the root window without going 
  through Nautilus/MetaCity.  They get hidden by the window 
  manager's own backgrounds.  Now, for years I have been 
  compiling a collection of scanned calendar images (landscapes)
  and astronomical vistas which I have been able to use as
  wallpaper at whim, using my own little menu program.  I resent
  being forced to jump through hoops to do something simple - it
  is so Redmond don't you agree.
 
 You can copy your images to ~/.gnome-desktop 
 
 
  The font rendering leaves a lot to be desired.  This is the
  first time fonts have ever been a problem, always crisp and
  clear in both RedHat and Mandrake.  No doubt one can improve
  them.
 
 I agree completely on this. 
 
  Icons all over the desktop.  I dislike floating icons and 
  usually remove them immediately, preferring to invoke applications
  from the panel (with a single click!).  And, this is the worst
  bit.  The icons are all owned by root!  A user cannot edit the
  preferences, or delete the icon. 
 
 I haven't actually done this, but you could remove your icons from
 ~/.gnome-desktop. Mine are owned by my user. 
 
  For pity's sake, what are the
  Gnome developers smoking?
 
 Ask them, it's sure to be good ;) 
 
  There appears to be no way to specify the number of workspaces;
  I normally have 6, the default is 4.  I suspect that there is
  somewhere that this can be done, as root no doubt.
 
 Right click on the workspace switcher, click Prederences. You can have
 as many as you wish. 
 
  Sorry for the rant - hope I have not offended anyone.
 
 Not at all, mate. I have my own issues with the desktop, but I suspect
 it's more a Mdk than a Gnome problem for me. Keep rockin'. 
Will do - you do the same son.  

Thanks for the tips.  Will see if this thing can be hammered into shape. 
--- 
Len Lawrence




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Totally scunnered with MetaCity

2002-11-27 Thread Len Lawrence
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:58:11 +1100
Sridhar Dhanapalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 28 Nov 2002 15:26:37 +1100, Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 23:35, Len Lawrence wrote:
   Well, that's it.  No more Mandrake.  Linux Format provided 9.0 on DVD
   ---snip snip snip ---
 GNOME is not the problem, you just need to know how to configure it. Nobody is
 forcing you to use Metacity. In fact, Sawfish is still the official WM of the
 GNOME Project, at least for the time being. I use Sawfish instead of Metacity in
 GNOME. Nautilus' management of the desktop can be turned off in its preferences,
 leaving you with a bare desktop. You don't need to be root to alter any GNOME
 settings.
 
 So with that said, what exactly is wrong with GNOME2 that pushed you back to
 GNOME1? I have found GNOME2 to be leagues ahead of its predecessor. It is not
 quite as functional yet, but no doubt it will get there soon. It is already much
 faster and easier to use.
No, my complaint was basically about the window manager.  I did not realise that
Nautilus could be replaced by Sawfish, et al.  I had (mis)understood that the
various components were inextricably entangled. 

Thanks Sridhar, will explore the options.
-- 
Len Lawrence




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com