Weird Vista RDP client issue
Hi list, I am experiencing a weird RDP client issue. I am using Vista SP1 which has MSTSC.exe v 6.0.6001.18000. This client works fine for all out 2003 and 2000 servers and used to work fine for our new 2008 Terminal Server until yesterday, and on this one terminal server when I connect it works for approx 2 minutes then gives the following error Problem Event Name:APPCRASH Application Name:mstsc.exe Application Version:6.0.6001.18000 Application Timestamp:47919247 Fault Module Name:x2upB3.dll Fault Module Version:5072.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp:47d02900 Exception Code:c005 Exception Offset:00052ec4 OS Version:6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.6 Locale ID:2057 Additional Information 1:6d4b Additional Information 2:8916a1cb49db423bb3a1e1599f2683a8 Additional Information 3:48f0 Additional Information 4:9b67a565c27498a60a83d5506b3f98cc I cannot find any info on the net, and the client connects to all other TS's with no issue, and my colleagues PC with Vista SP1 connects to this TS with no issues. I have no other 2008 servers to test the connection to. Any one got any ideas as to how I can resolve this. Thansk Graeme -- Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Weird Vista RDP client issue
X2upB3.dll - what is that? According to the Microsoft .dll database, that isn't a Microsoft .dll Do you have any printers or devices that you might be sharing that could cause something to crap out in your TS session? I'd start by finding who the vendor is for that .dll Cheers Ken From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 27 June 2008 5:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Weird Vista RDP client issue Hi list, I am experiencing a weird RDP client issue. I am using Vista SP1 which has MSTSC.exe v 6.0.6001.18000. This client works fine for all out 2003 and 2000 servers and used to work fine for our new 2008 Terminal Server until yesterday, and on this one terminal server when I connect it works for approx 2 minutes then gives the following error Problem Event Name:APPCRASH Application Name:mstsc.exe Application Version:6.0.6001.18000 Application Timestamp:47919247 Fault Module Name:x2upB3.dll Fault Module Version:5072.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp:47d02900 Exception Code:c005 Exception Offset:00052ec4 OS Version:6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.6 Locale ID:2057 Additional Information 1:6d4b Additional Information 2:8916a1cb49db423bb3a1e1599f2683a8 Additional Information 3:48f0 Additional Information 4:9b67a565c27498a60a83d5506b3f98cc I cannot find any info on the net, and the client connects to all other TS's with no issue, and my colleagues PC with Vista SP1 connects to this TS with no issues. I have no other 2008 servers to test the connection to. Any one got any ideas as to how I can resolve this. Thansk Graeme ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. *__* *Stefan Jafs* *From:* Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too… - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Kaspersky AV
True. I'm itching to try it myself. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 16:33 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Yes, but only for the moment. All of these NOD users are going to move to VIPRE Enterprise soon: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/ and more important: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/Why-VIPRE-Enterprise/VIPRE.htm Why? See Alex's recent blog post: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/veteran-security-expert-michael-st.h tml ;-D Stu _ From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Honestly, I think you fell into the NOD32 crowd here. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: vbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:22 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Kaspersky AV Anyone using or familar with Kaspersky's AV business products suites? I am considering a shift for some of my customers from Trend or Symantec to there products as they support a managed environment on both peer to peer and Domain environments. They are very agressive in their upgrade pricing and the renewals are much less than Symantec. I hope someone on the list had some first hand knowledge with them and felt comfortable recommending the product and their support services. -- Thanks Dave Vantine . ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Icann and IANA sites hacked
Rather amusing piece of website defacement from the Full-Disclosure list, given the current internet land-grab being promoted by ICANN http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1356 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Kaspersky AV
Is this product in production now? I'd like to see some comparative statistics on viruses, trojans, etc caught/disabled. Christopher J. Bosak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/27/2008 8:20 AM True. I’m itching to try it myself. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From:Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 16:33 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Yes, but only for the moment. All of these NOD users are going to move to VIPRE Enterprise soon: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/ and more important: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/Why-VIPRE-Enterprise/VIPRE.htm Why? See Alex's recent blog post: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/veteran-security-expert-michael-st.html ;-D Stu From:Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Honestly, I think you fell into the NOD32 crowd here. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From:vbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:22 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Kaspersky AV Anyone using or familar with Kaspersky's AV business products suites? I am considering a shift for some of my customers from Trend or Symantec to there products as they support a managed environment on both peer to peer and Domain environments. They are very agressive in their upgrade pricing and the renewals are much less than Symantec. I hope someone on the list had some first hand knowledge with them and felt comfortable recommending the product and their support services. -- Thanks Dave Vantine . Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: NTBackup failing on large files
Why are you backing up the .mdf and .ldf files if you have a .bak file backup generated by your maintenance plan? If you want to back up live .mdf and .ldf files you need to stop your sql services. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 June 2008 15:02 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NTBackup failing on large files Nope. I've been told that's bad for .mdf and .ldf files. - Original Message - From: Webster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:00 AM Subject: RE: NTBackup failing on large files Do you have compression enabled on the drive you are backing up to? Webster From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NTBackup failing on large files Maintenance plan within SQL 2000 Enterprise. - Original Message - From: Webster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NTBackup failing on large files From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NTBackup failing on large files I am running Windows Server Enterprise 2003. I am running SQL Enterprise 2003. On a 32 bit install. I run SQL backup everynight. I have a 60GB backup file for my production database. I run NTBackup and it backup up all the databases except the Production database. It runs for about 2 hours backing it up and then fails within about 300 Mb of finishing stating the file is inconsistant. Has anyone seen this? When you say I run SQL backup everynight, do you mean you use a SQL maintenance plan to run a backup or you backup the actual database with NTBackup? __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ The information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). The information in this communication may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Nothing in this e-mail is intended to conclude a contract on behalf of QinetiQ or make QinetiQ subject to any other legally binding commitments, unless the e-mail contains an express statement to the contrary or incorporates a formal Purchase Order. For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful. Emails and other electronic communication with QinetiQ may be monitored and recorded for business purposes including security, audit and archival purposes. Any response to this email indicates consent to this. Telephone calls to QinetiQ may be monitored or recorded for quality control, security and other business purposes. QinetiQ Limited Registered in England Wales: Company Number:3796233 Registered office: 85 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6PD, United Kingdom Trading address: Cody Technology Park, Cody Building, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX, United Kingdom http://www.QinetiQ.com/home/legal.html ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: NTBackup failing on large files
I am not. I am backing up the S: drive that does not have compression and is only the .bak files. I was getting tired when I responded about the mdf's and ldf's. - Original Message - From: Ames Matthew B To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:25 AM Subject: RE: NTBackup failing on large files Why are you backing up the .mdf and .ldf files if you have a .bak file backup generated by your maintenance plan? If you want to back up live .mdf and .ldf files you need to stop your sql services. -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 June 2008 15:02 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NTBackup failing on large files Nope. I've been told that's bad for .mdf and .ldf files. - Original Message - From: Webster To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:00 AM Subject: RE: NTBackup failing on large files Do you have compression enabled on the drive you are backing up to? Webster From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NTBackup failing on large files Maintenance plan within SQL 2000 Enterprise. - Original Message - From: Webster Subject: RE: NTBackup failing on large files From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NTBackup failing on large files I am running Windows Server Enterprise 2003. I am running SQL Enterprise 2003. On a 32 bit install. I run SQL backup everynight. I have a 60GB backup file for my production database. I run NTBackup and it backup up all the databases except the Production database. It runs for about 2 hours backing it up and then fails within about 300 Mb of finishing stating the file is inconsistant. Has anyone seen this? When you say I run SQL backup everynight, do you mean you use a SQL maintenance plan to run a backup or you backup the actual database with NTBackup? __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ The information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). The information in this communication may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Nothing in this e-mail is intended to conclude a contract on behalf of QinetiQ or make QinetiQ subject to any other legally binding commitments, unless the e-mail contains an express statement to the contrary or incorporates a formal Purchase Order. For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful. Emails and other electronic communication with QinetiQ may be monitored and recorded for business purposes including security, audit and archival purposes. Any response to this email indicates consent to this. Telephone calls to QinetiQ may be monitored or recorded for quality control, security and other business purposes. QinetiQ Limited Registered in England Wales: Company Number:3796233 Registered office: 85 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6PD, United Kingdom Trading address: Cody Technology Park, Cody Building, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX, United Kingdom http://www.QinetiQ.com/home/legal.html __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
HP Certification
Anyone here HP server certified or have any info on their certification program. I've been asked to look in to this and really have not heard much about it. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Logoff script issue
Not a logoff script solution, but have you tried installing UPHClean? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1B286E6D-8912-4E18-B570-42470E2F3582displaylang=en -Bonnie From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Logoff script issue Does anyone know how I can get a logoff script to run with administrative privileges? I need to kill off some open memory handles that are causing profiles to fail to unload, and only the mighty handle.exe from SysInternals can seem to cut the mustard via a bit of quick batch. However it appears that handle.exe needs admin rights to run. I have tried RunAs and it can't be passed a password, also psexec won't execute the file properly from the netlogon share, so I am kind of running out of options. If anyone knows how this can be elevated (or, alternatively, any rights or permissions changes that may make handle.exe run for a limited user), then I would be extremely grateful. TIA, JRR ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: Logoff script issue
Yes, it didn't seem to help at all, although it claimed to have unloaded some bits and bobs I am actually on the verge of removing the piece of software causing this issue and telling my boss I will not have it installed in the Citrix farm. The software in question is Office Communicator 2007. If this program is launched, the profile will simply never unload until you close the memory handle, or the server restarts. 2008/6/27 Miller Bonnie L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Not a logoff script solution, but have you tried installing UPHClean? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1B286E6D-8912-4E18-B570-42470E2F3582displaylang=en -Bonnie *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:46 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Logoff script issue Does anyone know how I can get a logoff script to run with administrative privileges? I need to kill off some open memory handles that are causing profiles to fail to unload, and only the mighty handle.exe from SysInternals can seem to cut the mustard via a bit of quick batch. However it appears that handle.exe needs admin rights to run. I have tried RunAs and it can't be passed a password, also psexec won't execute the file properly from the netlogon share, so I am kind of running out of options. If anyone knows how this can be elevated (or, alternatively, any rights or permissions changes that may make handle.exe run for a limited user), then I would be extremely grateful. TIA, JRR ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: HP Certification
Have a look at http://www.hp.com/education/ Hth René From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: HP Certification Anyone here HP server certified or have any info on their certification program. I've been asked to look in to this and really have not heard much about it. Thanks *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information. *** ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
Sounds like I jumped ship just in time. :) From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. __ Stefan Jafs From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too... - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
And went to what? Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Sounds like I jumped ship just in time. :-) From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. __ Stefan Jafs From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too... - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
Thailand. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And went to what? Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Sounds like I jumped ship just in time. J From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. __ Stefan Jafs From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too… - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
You guys see this?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
Ya, and I liked the idea of it taking over for WSUS also, combining the two functions into one tool, less work for me to maintain... Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? :-) From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
Well, Shookie would be the 1st party, and I guess that would leave ME2 as the 2nd party... hmm, wonder if that's where the 2 came from... Joe Heaton From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? :-) From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: Installing an .msp?
My party is in my pants. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, Shookie would be the 1st party, and I guess that would leave ME2 as the 2nd party... hmm, wonder if that's where the 2 came from... Joe Heaton From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? J From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool… Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you…and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles…and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
The weird thing is that Shook's party is in the same place. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Installing an .msp? My party is in my pants. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, Shookie would be the 1st party, and I guess that would leave ME2 as the 2nd party... hmm, wonder if that's where the 2 came from... Joe Heaton From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? J From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
Tea for two? Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? The weird thing is that Shook's party is in the same place. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Installing an .msp? My party is in my pants. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, Shookie would be the 1st party, and I guess that would leave ME2 as the 2nd party... hmm, wonder if that's where the 2 came from... Joe Heaton From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? J From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
Yeah but it's a small party. Shook -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? The weird thing is that Shook's party is in the same place. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Installing an .msp? My party is in my pants. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, Shookie would be the 1st party, and I guess that would leave ME2 as the 2nd party... hmm, wonder if that's where the 2 came from... Joe Heaton From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? J From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
So said your mama. From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
No, TMI -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Tea for two? Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? The weird thing is that Shook's party is in the same place. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Installing an .msp? My party is in my pants. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, Shookie would be the 1st party, and I guess that would leave ME2 as the 2nd party... hmm, wonder if that's where the 2 came from... Joe Heaton From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So, who's your 1st and 2nd party tools? J From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
Plus it adds the ability to install apps using the WSUS technology which is very cool if you have a distributed environment. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Ya, and I liked the idea of it taking over for WSUS also, combining the two functions into one tool, less work for me to maintain... Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Learning VB.net
Hello gang, I will be spending many hours traveling over the next few weeks, and I wanted to use that as an opportunity to learn VB.net. I would appreciate a book recommendation (must be a book, no internet access while flying yet), especially if it is one that is geared towards web development. Not looking at becoming an expert, but we have an ASP intranet that is in dire need of retiring... If it makes any difference, I intend to use Visual Studio VB.net Express (hey, it's free) as learning tool. Eric ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Installing an .msp?
No remember what my mama said to you. She said, TVK, the last time I saw something that big, it had an eraser on the end of it. Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? So said your mama. From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? You're a 3rd party tool... Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? We use Orion here too. Our Cisco guys use and love it, but it doesn't give me the granularity I wanted into my Windows systems. Not to mention that SCE is less than half the price of Orion and it does some very nice Cisco device monitoring with one of the 3rd party tools you can add on. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? I was really interested in what I saw with SCE, but the management decided to go with Orion from Solarwinds for the network monitoring tool. Ah well, not like I'm going to be using it or anything...ahhh, wait a minute! (But seriously, what Orion does seems like an ok fit for what we wanted...) Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Glad it worked for you...and thanks, I was happy with the way it turned out. I was a bit concerned going in since Redmond tends to run a fairly anti-Microsoft slant to most of their articles...and I do LOVE SCE. Great product for those of us poor fools in the mid-market. Tim From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? That seems to be the issue. Thanks TVK :) By the way, I saw you in Redmond magazine...nice article. Joe Heaton From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? Have you checked the properties on the file and Unblocked it if necessary. If it was moved from another file server the security could be getting you. Tim From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Installing an .msp? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installing an .msp? How do you run this? I tried double-clicking it and it told me access denied. I'm logged into the server as a domain admin account, which has local admin rights as well. This may be a silly question to some, but I've never worked with an .msp file before. All Citrix hotfixes and updates are sent as MSP files. I have never had any issues installing them. Just download the file and double-click it. When I double-click My Computer, Tools Folder Options, File Types and scroll down to MSP, my MSP is listed as a Microsoft Installer Patch associated with Windows Installer. What is yours set to? Webster ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Kaspersky AV
No, it ships end of July. It's in beta right now. It will ship with Wildlist certification from West Coast Labs, more certs to follow. It includes almost all of the CounterSpy database so you could look at it as CounterSpy + Antivirus. Alex Alex Eckelberry, CEO Sunbelt Software 33 N. Garden Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33755 p: 727-562-0101 x220 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/ b: www.sunbeltblog.com file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/exec3.SSD/Application%20Data/Micr osoft/Signatures/www.sunbeltblog.com From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Is this product in production now? I'd like to see some comparative statistics on viruses, trojans, etc caught/disabled. Christopher J. Bosak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/27/2008 8:20 AM True. I'm itching to try it myself. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 16:33 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Yes, but only for the moment. All of these NOD users are going to move to VIPRE Enterprise soon: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/ and more important: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/Why-VIPRE-Enterprise/VIPRE.htm Why? See Alex's recent blog post: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/veteran-security-expert-michael- st.html ;-D Stu From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Honestly, I think you fell into the NOD32 crowd here. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: vbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:22 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Kaspersky AV Anyone using or familar with Kaspersky's AV business products suites? I am considering a shift for some of my customers from Trend or Symantec to there products as they support a managed environment on both peer to peer and Domain environments. They are very agressive in their upgrade pricing and the renewals are much less than Symantec. I hope someone on the list had some first hand knowledge with them and felt comfortable recommending the product and their support services. -- Thanks Dave Vantine . Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: You guys see this?
Used to be you could tell real addresses from fake ones. No more, once the new rules kick in. Could be that www.bite.my.shiny.metal.ass is real. John From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: You guys see this? http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: You guys see this?
That's gonna break a metric gazillion scripts that validate TLDs. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: You guys see this? Used to be you could tell real addresses from fake ones. No more, once the new rules kick in. Could be that www.bite.my.shiny.metal.ass is real. John From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: You guys see this? http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: You guys see this?
New frontiers for frontrunning/tasting, typo squatting (whitehouse.cmo), domain hostage taking (www.mcdonalds.restraurant or www.ford.auto anyone?) and all sorts of other foolishness. I love freedom, but paying the price at times is irksome. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: Neverfail feedback
We had a tech overview with an engineer yesterday and the product is def worth looking at. One issue is their MS Cluster product is very new (just released) and we're looking to protect a local 2 node cluster. I'll pass along details as I get them. Thanks! - Jer Eric Woodford wrote: Just installed NF here for BES. Really interesting product, but haven't had the chance to test in a disaster situation. 2 servers - one is identical mirror of second (same SID, same IP, etc.). Data and logs are replicated between the two servers. When the NF agent sees a change in the heartbeat between the two servers, it hides first from production and second is already online and ready to go. Then brings it online in an instant. On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My company is looking at Neverfail and while it looks good so far I'm looking for some feedback. This would be for Exchange (not BES, too much $$) between two sites for DR only. Thanks! - Jer ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: You guys see this?
Indeed. This is going to make the Internet a whole lot messier. Such much for structure... On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New frontiers for frontrunning/tasting, typo squatting (whitehouse.cmo), domain hostage taking (www.mcdonalds.restraurant or www.ford.auto anyone?) and all sorts of other foolishness. I love freedom, but paying the price at times is irksome. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Learning VB.net
Visual Basic 2008 Step by Step by Michael Halvorson, ISBN-13 978-0-7356-2537-2. The book is very simplistic and I don't like how he keeps referring to SQL Columns as Fields and Rows as Records. But as a quick learning guide it is OK. Webster From: E. Peeters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Learning VB.net Hello gang, I will be spending many hours traveling over the next few weeks, and I wanted to use that as an opportunity to learn VB.net. I would appreciate a book recommendation (must be a book, no internet access while flying yet), especially if it is one that is geared towards web development. Not looking at becoming an expert, but we have an ASP intranet that is in dire need of retiring... If it makes any difference, I intend to use Visual Studio VB.net Express (hey, it's free) as learning tool. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 03:09:52 PM: You serious? Yep. Think: recursion ... -Original Message- From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 26, 2008 3:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Change the name to addroutes.cmd. Then your assignment is to explain why it fixed it. -Original Message- From: Ara Avvali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Hehe I tried all combination. Name and extension no luck -Original Message- From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 26, 2008 2:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add I bet the script is called route.cmd or route.bat. Carl -Original Message- From: Klint Price - ArizonaITPro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:51 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: batch route add is this the entire script? do you get an error? Ara Avvali wrote: Hello everyone I am trying to make a batch file that does route add for me So I copied these lines in notepad, saved as ip.bat but it get stuck on first line and loops. Any idea why? route add 64.238.199.200 mask 255.255.255.248 10.133.151.193 -p route add 216.83.186.48 mask 255.255.255.240 10.133.151.193 -p ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
I've noticed that png files are becoming more and more a common default these days. Anyone else notice that? I suspect Lotus Notes may support them a few years from now. J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
.png is the wave of the future (already past), as far as the Interweb is concerned. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Rod Trent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed that png files are becoming more and more a common default these days. Anyone else notice that? I suspect Lotus Notes may support them a few years from now. J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Great, just another benefit of moving to Notes. Man I can't wait! ;) From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add I've noticed that png files are becoming more and more a common default these days. Anyone else notice that? I suspect Lotus Notes may support them a few years from now. :-) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use of this e-mail is prohibited. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) On 6/27/08 12:16 PM, Bob Free [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
Amen brother! And to further the virtual spanking... PNG was the correct image format to use for a screen shot (although, as Bob rightfully pointed out - it shouldn't have been used at all). JPGs are for photos. This says it all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPG#Recommended_usage Since, IIRC ~1996, PNG has been the intended successor to GIF. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Free, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Group Policy
Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
Sounds like you need to enable loopback policy processing and put the GPO on the computer's ou (filter to that computer if you need to). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287 -Bonnie From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
If you want to apply user policies based on the computer they login you want to look at loopback processing. Security group filtering is probably also your friend here. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Rod Trent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 02:57:32 PM: I?ve noticed that png files are becoming more and more a common default these days. Anyone else notice that? I've gotten 2, in the last 2 days. That's how I found out that Loathsome Notes won't display them by default. I had to view page source, to see what the embedded image was, and then request a JPG copy, so I could see the silly thing. I suspect Lotus Notes may support them a few years from now. J Optimist. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
Loopback policy would I enable it on the GPO that has the script or on the actual server? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Sounds like you need to enable loopback policy processing and put the GPO on the computer's ou (filter to that computer if you need to). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287 -Bonnie From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Free, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 03:16:38 PM: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? I am. Since I couldn't see the image, I had no idea what it was. But yes, a copy and paste from the command prompt window would have been easier. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 03:23:13 PM: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) A fellow club member! :-) Yeah, I'm olde skool about that myself. -- Michael Leone Network Administrator, ISM Philadelphia Housing Authority 2500 Jackson St Philadelphia, PA 19145 Tel: 215-684-4180 Cell: 215-252-0143 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
Hair Club? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Fri Jun 27 16:05:01 2008 Subject: Re: batch route add Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 03:23:13 PM: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) A fellow club member! :-) Yeah, I'm olde skool about that myself. -- Michael Leone Network Administrator, ISM Philadelphia Housing Authority 2500 Jackson St Philadelphia, PA 19145 Tel: 215-684-4180 Cell: 215-252-0143 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
For those who RTFM, or do some exploring on their own, it's probably better to: Select the cmd window ALT+CTRL+Space to drop down the options window, or click on the upper-left corner of the cmd box Select Properties Under the options tab mark at least Quick Edit Mode and Edit Mode - I also like to check Discard Old Duplicates the the Large cursor size Under layout, put 5000 (or more) in the Screen Buffer Size Height field - the others will depend on your preferences and screen resolution Then make the following registry changes (first line optional, but I like this prompt) which will give you tab completion, among other things: --Start Reg Entry file-- Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Command Processor] AutoRun=prompt [%computername%]$S$T$S$D$S$P$S$M$G$+$_# CompletionChar=dword:0009 DefaultColor=dword: EnableExtensions=dword:0001 PathCompletionChar=dword:0009 --End Reg Entry File-- you will have a command prompt that looks like this (note that the cursor follows the '#', and is two lines long): [KBUFF2003] 11:09:12.80 2007-07-23 C:\ } # Note that the date/time formats will vary depending on what your Regional settings are, as set in the Control Panel. I strongly suggest setting your time format to HH:mm:ss and your date format to -MM-DD. This will produce output and displays that sort better and are less ambiguous, and ultimately more readable, once you get used to them. Kurt On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) On 6/27/08 12:16 PM, Bob Free [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
+1 Let's hear it for clean, simple mail messaging! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: batch route add ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
GPO w/script, and then link that GPO to the computer and not users. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Loopback policy would I enable it on the GPO that has the script or on the actual server? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Sounds like you need to enable loopback policy processing and put the GPO on the computer's ou (filter to that computer if you need to). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287 -Bonnie From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
He uses Lotus. :O :P ;) - John Barsodi From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add +1 Let's hear it for clean, simple mail messaging! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: batch route add ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Thanks... I agree with your ludditeness, you can join my ServerCoreOnly-No-GUI in Server2010 campaign :-) Even easier..to me at least is Default|Options-Quick Edit mode. Right click becomes paste and left-click/highlight enter is copy like in other applications. I forget it even works the way you describe most of the time. I saved a reg file to my home directory years ago that sets my cmd environment to at least the basics I need and run it on every system I use. Just set it all the way you want it and export [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Console] [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Console\%SystemRoot%_system32_cmd.exe] to a reg file. I do the same for my prompt so I can see the UNC/Date/time/system/domain/username in all my cmd windows. -Original Message- From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: batch route add For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) On 6/27/08 12:16 PM, Bob Free [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 04:07:14 PM: Hair Club? Club Luddite, the hippest club in town ... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Fri Jun 27 16:05:01 2008 Subject: Re: batch route add Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 03:23:13 PM: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) A fellow club member! :-) Yeah, I'm olde skool about that myself. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
Aren't Ludites a religious cult?! :-) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Fri Jun 27 16:27:21 2008 Subject: Re: batch route add John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 04:07:14 PM: Hair Club? Club Luddite, the hippest club in town ... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Fri Jun 27 16:05:01 2008 Subject: Re: batch route add Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2008 03:23:13 PM: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) A fellow club member! :-) Yeah, I'm olde skool about that myself. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
That's what I have done and it's still not working. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy GPO w/script, and then link that GPO to the computer and not users. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Loopback policy would I enable it on the GPO that has the script or on the actual server? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Sounds like you need to enable loopback policy processing and put the GPO on the computer's ou (filter to that computer if you need to). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287 -Bonnie From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Terminal Server network troubleshooting statistics?
When I'm troubleshooting Windows Terminal Server performance/reliability issues, it would be nice to have some stats to evaluate. You know, things like the number of connections per user, packet retries, connection drops, average/peak latency, stuff like that. Windows Terminal Server doesn't seem to keep much for network stats. There's a bit in PerfMon, but not much that's really useful, and it looks like they aren't maintained cumulatively, only while it's running. It seems hard to believe that there isn't better info available. What have I missed? Is there any better way to get useful stats? /kenw ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: batch route add
Ah, a man after my own heart, my explorations came up with different registry paths, I will have to check out yours, it's slightly different approach but essentially the same result.. I love the Autorun...never seen that used in this context before.. I can ditch my little cmd file I set my prompt with.[1] Thanks! The other benefit I find, in addition to those you mentioned, is in logging and documenting things, especially when jumping around troubleshooting or doing things like schema extensions. I bump the buffer up to some huge value, even in some scripts leave everything echoed to the screen, edit, select all and you have a log for change management, permanent logs, notifications and/or future reference. [1] I use %computername%\%userdomain%\%username%$_$D$S$T$_$_$M$P$G right now but it's infinitely flexible and fun to play with. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: batch route add For those who RTFM, or do some exploring on their own, it's probably better to: Select the cmd window ALT+CTRL+Space to drop down the options window, or click on the upper-left corner of the cmd box Select Properties Under the options tab mark at least Quick Edit Mode and Edit Mode - I also like to check Discard Old Duplicates the the Large cursor size Under layout, put 5000 (or more) in the Screen Buffer Size Height field - the others will depend on your preferences and screen resolution Then make the following registry changes (first line optional, but I like this prompt) which will give you tab completion, among other things: --Start Reg Entry file-- Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Command Processor] AutoRun=prompt [%computername%]$S$T$S$D$S$P$S$M$G$+$_# CompletionChar=dword:0009 DefaultColor=dword: EnableExtensions=dword:0001 PathCompletionChar=dword:0009 --End Reg Entry File-- you will have a command prompt that looks like this (note that the cursor follows the '#', and is two lines long): [KBUFF2003] 11:09:12.80 2007-07-23 C:\ } # Note that the date/time formats will vary depending on what your Regional settings are, as set in the Control Panel. I strongly suggest setting your time format to HH:mm:ss and your date format to -MM-DD. This will produce output and displays that sort better and are less ambiguous, and ultimately more readable, once you get used to them. Kurt On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) On 6/27/08 12:16 PM, Bob Free [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
Did you enable loopback within the GPO? System| Group Policy | enable Loopback Policy option. Also, if you filter the GPO on a group of comp accts, you need to reboot the server to get it to pick up the group's token after you add it to the group. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy That's what I have done and it's still not working. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy GPO w/script, and then link that GPO to the computer and not users. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Loopback policy would I enable it on the GPO that has the script or on the actual server? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Sounds like you need to enable loopback policy processing and put the GPO on the computer's ou (filter to that computer if you need to). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287 -Bonnie From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation
RE: You guys see this?
Well let's hope the $50K price to own a TLD helps to suppress the typo squatters. But this new degree of freedom, while good in some regards, is going to lead to unforeseen problems that won't be solved for several years. Not the least of which is the user-training problem. Users don't understand that websites don't have to start with www, and similarly many are going to be tacking a .com on the end of URLs that don't end in .com for years to come. Carl -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: You guys see this? Indeed. This is going to make the Internet a whole lot messier. Such much for structure... On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New frontiers for frontrunning/tasting, typo squatting (whitehouse.cmo), domain hostage taking (www.mcdonalds.restraurant or www.ford.auto anyone?) and all sorts of other foolishness. I love freedom, but paying the price at times is irksome. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: batch route add
I'm adopting your prompt, with a slight modification - I like my cursor after the sharp on a separate line - having to begin my typing so far into the screen, after the prompt, annoys me, as does the extra CR/LF in the prompt. And, I changed the format of the first line a bit. Thus: prompt [%userdomain%\%username% on %computername%]$_$D$S$T$_$P$_# Nice... Thanks! On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Free, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, a man after my own heart, my explorations came up with different registry paths, I will have to check out yours, it's slightly different approach but essentially the same result.. I love the Autorun...never seen that used in this context before.. I can ditch my little cmd file I set my prompt with.[1] Thanks! The other benefit I find, in addition to those you mentioned, is in logging and documenting things, especially when jumping around troubleshooting or doing things like schema extensions. I bump the buffer up to some huge value, even in some scripts leave everything echoed to the screen, edit, select all and you have a log for change management, permanent logs, notifications and/or future reference. [1] I use %computername%\%userdomain%\%username%$_$D$S$T$_$_$M$P$G right now but it's infinitely flexible and fun to play with. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: batch route add For those who RTFM, or do some exploring on their own, it's probably better to: Select the cmd window ALT+CTRL+Space to drop down the options window, or click on the upper-left corner of the cmd box Select Properties Under the options tab mark at least Quick Edit Mode and Edit Mode - I also like to check Discard Old Duplicates the the Large cursor size Under layout, put 5000 (or more) in the Screen Buffer Size Height field - the others will depend on your preferences and screen resolution Then make the following registry changes (first line optional, but I like this prompt) which will give you tab completion, among other things: --Start Reg Entry file-- Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Command Processor] AutoRun=prompt [%computername%]$S$T$S$D$S$P$S$M$G$+$_# CompletionChar=dword:0009 DefaultColor=dword: EnableExtensions=dword:0001 PathCompletionChar=dword:0009 --End Reg Entry File-- you will have a command prompt that looks like this (note that the cursor follows the '#', and is two lines long): [KBUFF2003] 11:09:12.80 2007-07-23 C:\ } # Note that the date/time formats will vary depending on what your Regional settings are, as set in the Control Panel. I strongly suggest setting your time format to HH:mm:ss and your date format to -MM-DD. This will produce output and displays that sort better and are less ambiguous, and ultimately more readable, once you get used to them. Kurt On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those following along at home Right click in CMD window MARK (select area) PASTE resulting text. Alternately CMD command somefile.txt (yes, I'm a Luddite who prefers plain text emails whenever possible) On 6/27/08 12:16 PM, Bob Free [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead ./rant on Are you serious? How about learn how to use the clipboard to freaking copy the text from a cmd prompt instead of sending a picture. Major pet peeve of mine. Sorry to be harsh but that's about as lame as it gets, only thing worse sending a graphic of a cmd window is sending the entire desktop ...oops, that's what just happened. Besides that, I have gotten screenshots of the desktop, in freaking multi-MB bitmaps no less from ppl trying to send me a single event from event viewer. I tell them they need to learn to use the clipboard before I will help them..or find a new line of work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: batch route add Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/26/2008 02:58:00 PM: Screen shot attachted [image removed] For anyone interested, Lotus Notes has no intrinsic view for .PNG graphics such as this. In future, perhaps you could embed a standard JPG instead, please? JPGs are much more ubiquitous than .PNGs. Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with
RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
Switched to Forefront. Have to say I'm really liking it so far. MUCH easier deployment. TVK From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? And went to what? Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Sounds like I jumped ship just in time. :) From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. __ Stefan Jafs From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too... - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Kaspersky AV
to try it = From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV True. I'm itching to try it myself. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 16:33 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Yes, but only for the moment. All of these NOD users are going to move to VIPRE Enterprise soon: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/ and more important: http://www.vipreenterprise.com/Why-VIPRE-Enterprise/VIPRE.htm Why? See Alex's recent blog post: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/veteran-security-expert-michael- st.html ;-D Stu From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Kaspersky AV Honestly, I think you fell into the NOD32 crowd here. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: vbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:22 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Kaspersky AV Anyone using or familar with Kaspersky's AV business products suites? I am considering a shift for some of my customers from Trend or Symantec to there products as they support a managed environment on both peer to peer and Domain environments. They are very agressive in their upgrade pricing and the renewals are much less than Symantec. I hope someone on the list had some first hand knowledge with them and felt comfortable recommending the product and their support services. -- Thanks Dave Vantine . ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
Sellout :P Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Switched to Forefront. Have to say I'm really liking it so far. MUCH easier deployment. TVK From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? And went to what? Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Sounds like I jumped ship just in time. :-) From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. __ Stefan Jafs From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too... - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue?
The deployment of NOD32 is about as easy as it can get! You search for unprotected computers push the install the user reboots and you are done! __ Painstakingly sent from BlackBerry. From: Andy Shook To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Fri Jun 27 20:19:58 2008 Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Sellout :P Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Switched to Forefront. Have to say I’m really liking it so far. MUCH easier deployment. TVK From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? And went to what? Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Sounds like I jumped ship just in time. :-) From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? I sure did and am still picking up the pieces of the mess it left. Jon On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never had any issues with it here. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Not here! I have 200 Desktops on 3218 and 2 stragglers on 3217 with no Virus Alerts in 4 Hours. __ Stefan Jafs From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 15:48 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NOD32 v2 definition issue? Latest defs still popping false positives. Anyone got anything on this? -- Durf On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rescanned my local system and the file that popped up for me the first time did not pop up this time. Definitions were updated to the 3218. Now to go back and check the server. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The server seeing all the errors is on 3217 though. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am on 3218 definitions at the moment I am hoping that it passed through to that one as well. Jon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with the 3217 definitions. I saw a post about it on the Wilder Security Forums. Causing me a headache too… - Andy O. From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 v2 definition issue? ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
old hp equipment
Anyone know a place I might have luck getting old HP server equipment? G3/G4 models? More specifically a 641 RAID Controller with 192mb BBWC? I have a couple ML350 G3s laying around, but they come with 532 controllers, and they have poor read performance, no write cache (not even an option). Would like to upgrade the controllers if possible. Let me know. Thanks! JR ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: old hp equipment
You might try Knut at serverworlds.com. He has always managed to find what I am looking for with regards to 'more experienced' HP/Compaq kit. hth, Andrew. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Jesse Rink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know a place I might have luck getting old HP server equipment? G3/G4 models? More specifically a 641 RAID Controller with 192mb BBWC? I have a couple ML350 G3s laying around, but they come with 532 controllers, and they have poor read performance, no write cache (not even an option). Would like to upgrade the controllers if possible. Let me know. Thanks! JR ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: You guys see this?
If you cant afford a new top level domain just hijack ICANN and IANA! http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20080627/tc_nf/60525;_ylt=An1D41gMOxqsbEZZq8FOnaQjtBAF On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9978448-7.html Can't wait to see what types of names they come up with. [/sarcasm] Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mike Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: old hp equipment
www.shopspares.com They don't have a lot of stuff on the site, but Andy has virtually every part you would ever need. I've done a ton of business with him over the years. Call them or email and ask for Andy. He will set you up. 877-271-5356 From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 6:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: old hp equipment Anyone know a place I might have luck getting old HP server equipment? G3/G4 models? More specifically a 641 RAID Controller with 192mb BBWC? I have a couple ML350 G3s laying around, but they come with 532 controllers, and they have poor read performance, no write cache (not even an option). Would like to upgrade the controllers if possible. Let me know. Thanks! JR ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Group Policy
Then you need to work out what you have done wrong. Cheers Ken From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 28 June 2008 6:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy That's what I have done and it's still not working. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy GPO w/script, and then link that GPO to the computer and not users. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Loopback policy would I enable it on the GPO that has the script or on the actual server? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Policy Sounds like you need to enable loopback policy processing and put the GPO on the computer's ou (filter to that computer if you need to). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287 -Bonnie From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Group Policy Hi all I am running in native AD 2003 mode I need to rollout a printer GP to one Windows 2003 server. The goal is to have a script be initialized upon any users logging into this specific server simple admin task. I created an OU added the server into the OU and then assigned the login script to the computer WindowsScripting. However, when I login the script doesn't run by the way the script is a batch file mapping printers. In order to isolate the issue I modified the group policy to userswindowsscripting then added a user to the OU upon login the script ran without any problems. But then I logged with the same user in different OU and the script ran again that's a problem. My goal right now is to figure out a way to have the script run for any user but only on one server. Sincerely Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~
Hoping to find someone tonight...
How's that for a subject line, eh? But, it's true, though you'll have to meet some strict criteria. Namely, I need help with configuring an HP 3400cl and a set of Cisco 2950T-48s. Here's the sitrep: I'm trying to ditch an old Cisco 2948G-L3, and move to a 3400cl. I have a 2950T-24 that seems to work just fine with the HP - I can put the VLANs on it, and ping from one VLAN to another, and it seems to be fine. BUT - when I switch all of my servers (which each have a port of their own on the 3400cl, and are not connected to any other switch) and the 6x2950T-48s to the 3400cl, it falls apart, in a weird way. BTW - Internet access is through an HP 2524 that is also moving between the Cisco and HP, but it doesn't have any VLANs on it. It works just fine too. Once they've moved from the Cisco to the HP, the servers are just fine, and can talk with each other, and get out to the Internet via the HP 2524 - that's how I'm able to talk with you currently - but the 2950T-48s can't talk. Their link lights aren't even lit. Nothing. Nada. I power cycled both the 2950Ts and the 3400cl, with no luck. I've examined the configs on the 2950T-24, which works, and one of the 2950T-48s, which doesn't work, and I can't see any differences, aside from port count. Both are set up with trunks set up on gigabit port 1, same configuration down the line. This is the third time I've tried this, and I've engaged two different consulting firms to help out, and I'm going to stay here until it's either finished, or I can't stay awake any more, and have to switch it back. Any thoughts you might have would be greatly appreciated. Kurt ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: VMWare in DR site
I know Platespin (and others) have a P2V incremental replication that might be helpful. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Active Elk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Our client wants to have a DR site. In the primary site, all servers are in physical box. There is no virtualization in place. In the DR site, they wanted all the DR servers to be in a virtual environment. May I know for guys have implemented this, do you mind sharing your experience and what to look out for? So far what I can think of is using software like CA XOSoft or Double Take to do a host to host replication to the DR site. Is there a better way to do it? Thanks. Best Regards, Wei Yu New Email names for you! Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. Hurry before someone else does! http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/sg/ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: VMWare in DR site
Do they want their site 'cold' or 'warm'? I used to have all my production machines physical, but in DR firedrills, I would bring them up live in VMs in the DR site. -Original Message- From: Active Elk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: VMWare in DR site Hi, Our client wants to have a DR site. In the primary site, all servers are in physical box. There is no virtualization in place. In the DR site, they wanted all the DR servers to be in a virtual environment. May I know for guys have implemented this, do you mind sharing your experience and what to look out for? So far what I can think of is using software like CA XOSoft or Double Take to do a host to host replication to the DR site. Is there a better way to do it? Thanks. Best Regards, Wei Yu New Email names for you! Get the Email name you#39;ve always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. Hurry before someone else does! http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/sg/ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
