RE: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

2010-05-27 Thread Ziots, Edward
Thanks

Z

 

Edward Ziots

CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

401-639-3505

ezi...@lifespan.org

 

From: Mark Boersma [mailto:ma...@triangle-inc.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

 

Negative, I've been running the agents since 7.2, now on 7.5 without any
issues.  Imho the agents are by far the least intrusive and easiest way
to go.

 

Mark

-

Two rules for success in life:

1. Never tell people everything you know.

 

Mark Boersma

IT Manager

Triangle Associates, Inc.

ma...@triangle-inc.com

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 4:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

 

We are doing small deployment to figure out whether to switch over to
Agent based patching with Shavlik 7.5. We tried out the Agent push on 2
XP SP3 workstations today, and getting reports from the users that IE is
not working, cant click on anything in the screen ( Fields within a
webpage, Google Search fields etc etc) 

 

Anyone else seen this? 

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

401-639-3505

ezi...@lifespan.org

 

 

 



Please consider the environment before printing this email.


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

WebSense V5000 appliance

2010-05-27 Thread James Rankin
Anyone using any of the WebSense V-Series appliances for web filtering? We
already have an IronPort and are looking to put one of these appliances in
to replace our existing WebSense WebFilter software, as we have problems
integrating it with our workstations and Citrix servers together. Does
anyone have any good/bad real-world experiences to share? I'd be
particularly interested in hearing how well they play with Citrix XenApp
systems, but all input is appreciated.

TIA,



JRR

-- 
On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
a question.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

2010-05-27 Thread Andy Shook
...said Steven.

Shook

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

This thread is surprisingly subdued.

-sc

From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

I don't think this will produce anything substantive..

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

No, he means subversion.

From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

Don't you mean subtraction? ;)

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

Subjection skills ain't what they used to be.

-sc

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

What? That can subject 2 from 32? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

I'd love to have candidates with that ability. They are hard to find...

-sc

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 1:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

I would fail the OSI part (sure I could Google it just now) as it was back in 
the NetWare days that I learned about it in a class. Heard of it, does that 
count? 27-bit subnet? Not off the top of my head, I'd have to think okay a 
.128 mask is 25 bits I can explain DNS and forwarding, MX records, 
Aliases, HOSTS file, DHCP incl. reservations, and give you jack of all trades 
firewall info, conceptualize memory protection rings, and go to town on 
registry, AD and GPO design as well as give examples of being able to handle a 
near vertical learning curve. Am I hired?

The way I view being  an IT guy is day in and day out I'm not necessarily using 
$30/hr expertise, but there are spikes where I feel I surpass the I've got 
certs but no real IT skills Joe at figuring something out and at those times 
word 2-3x my nominal salary so on balance it works out.

That's my story I'm stickin' to it.

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

It's kinda funny that you mention the OSI model, since there are any number of 
people here that will dismiss it as irrelevant (personally I think that it's 
very relevant to know if you want to advance in an IT career)

Corporations, in an ever ending quest to cut costs (or at least, regulate 
costs) will not continue to pay ludicrous amounts of money for the dross that 
the IT industry produces. There are far too many people being paid inflated 
salaries in this industry, without being able to deliver tangible/measurable 
results. One only needs to look at project delivery in large corporations, and 
at the small end, the dedicated people who manage to do tasks in a manual 
manner (this list included has people who have the time to spend working out 
the best way to do some task for an individual user, yet they must get paid 
$30-60k, which no other industry would accept).

As the industry matures there simply will not be the opportunity for mediocrity 
to survive, just like every other mature industry. If you are merely average, 
you'll earn an average salary, and you won't be part of IT - or you might be 
part of an IT provider conglomerate. If you want to be a 6-7 figure earner, 
then you'll need to provide ever increasing levels of business value, just like 
every other industry (with the possible exception of Sales, where a really good 
pitch can make up for lack of substance, but let's not confuse sales and 
delivery :) )

Cheers
Ken

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2010 11:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

I've dismissed more network candidates than I can remember because they 
couldn't calculate the number of hosts in a subnet. Or had even heard of an OSI 
model.

Systems Engineers who are at a loss to even at a high level explain the ideas 
of process, threads, memory protection, etc... Windows Admins who are clueless 
about registry interaction, CMD line tools, authorization principles, 
environment variables, etc...

RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

2010-05-27 Thread Phillip Partipilo
And it's so flippin amazing how many times I get distracted and called off to 
some problem where often my first line of defense when some brown matter is 
hitting the fan, is simply start with an easy reboot, and so often that’s all 
that’s required. You'd think users would figure this out before panicking and 
picking up the phone.


Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107



-Original Message-
From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone 
seen this?

I have told some of my guys that it’s the karate kid methodology.

If you don’t have connectivity.

Check the cable, check link, check errors on switch...
Cant ping, check IP, check subnet, check gateway
Etc etc etc...

Wax on, wax off
Paint the fence
Sand the floor
Next thing you know you are doing karate  or checking out networks..

Not completely accurate, but it wasn’t the best example of karate either..
Greg

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone 
seen this?

Agreed.

You don't need to know OSI to be able to put some network infrastructure 
together. You don't need to know normalisation to design a database. You don't 
need to know OOP to write an application. But all of this theory is quite 
useful in doing things in a better way, because they provide frameworks that 
have been around for a long time, which many people are familiar with, and 
which haven't been replaced with something better yet. And as you acquire new 
knowledge, they provide the background info that lets you see how it all hangs 
together.

Cheers
Ken

-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2010 10:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone 
seen this?

It all comes down to this :

The OSI model is part of the 'fundamental' knowledge.  It's not 100% required 
to learn concepts above and more accurate, but it *does* provide a great 
background for learning and applying the knowledge you do gain.


Erik Goldoff
IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks,  Security

'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '


-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone 
seen this?

OSI, per se, doesn't help anyone do anything.

But it provides a framework, so that when you're discussing some problem with 
another engineer/architect/PM and they say why don't we do 'x'? you can draw 
up something quick and say:
 the problem is here:

+-
| - what you are talking about
+-
|
+-
|   -problem is here
+-

This can help when architecting an encryption solution, or when you're 
troubleshooting some network issue. It provides a hierarchy of requirements 
(upper levels are not going to work if something lower in the stack isn't).

Cheers
Ken


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Modular malware

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8857
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Brown
There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
piece is too costly.

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
report encryption status back to a management station?

tiafah.

Jeff

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Bill Lambert
TrueCrypt...free.

 

http://www.truecrypt.org/

 

 

 

Bill Lambert

Concuity

Phone  847-941-9206

 

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this
message.  Thank you.

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

 

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
that discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
have bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
encryption piece is too costly.

 

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
will report encryption status back to a management station?

 

tiafah.

 

Jeff

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Karl Bickmore
Truecrypt is pretty easy and free.

 Karl Bickmore

MSCE NT4/2K/2K3, MCP, MCP+I, MCSA 2K/2K3
LPI-1, CCNA, CCDA, Net+,Security+,Linux+
DataCore SANmelody Certified


6613 N Scottsdale Road
Suite 101
Scottsdale AZ, 85250
480-553-9967 X100
k...@ccnsconsulting.commailto:k...@ccnsconsulting.com

[cid:image001.jpg@01CAFD72.C579BFB0]


Please remember CCNS is a referral based business. If you have a friend or 
colleague in need, we are happy to help. Feel free to pass along our contact 
information to anyone you think we can help. Thanks!


From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that 
discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have 
bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need something 
for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption piece is too 
costly.

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will 
report encryption status back to a management station?

tiafah.

Jeff





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~inline: image001.jpg

RE: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

2010-05-27 Thread Ziots, Edward
Well there is a way to turn that offer in the agents I believe, since we
are using Mcrappy still. 

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

401-639-3505

ezi...@lifespan.org

 

From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

 

And they include the VIPRE engine... (so it must be good) J

 

Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman

Co-Founder, Publisher, Sunbelt Media
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
s...@sunbelt-software.com


  

 

From: Mark Boersma [mailto:ma...@triangle-inc.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

 

Negative, I've been running the agents since 7.2, now on 7.5 without any
issues.  Imho the agents are by far the least intrusive and easiest way
to go.

 

Mark

-

Two rules for success in life:

1. Never tell people everything you know.

 

Mark Boersma

IT Manager

Triangle Associates, Inc.

ma...@triangle-inc.com

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 4:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Is anyone using the Shavlik HFnetchk Pro 7. 2 or 7.5 agents

 

We are doing small deployment to figure out whether to switch over to
Agent based patching with Shavlik 7.5. We tried out the Agent push on 2
XP SP3 workstations today, and getting reports from the users that IE is
not working, cant click on anything in the screen ( Fields within a
webpage, Google Search fields etc etc) 

 

Anyone else seen this? 

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

401-639-3505

ezi...@lifespan.org

 

 

 



Please consider the environment before printing this email.


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

... 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
Understanding databases falls into the same category in my opinion. Some things 
I run into I can make sense of only because of days of using dBase IV to 
catalog and categorize my albums. Knowing the difference between a record and a 
row is sometimes the difference between comprehending it or not, for example.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone 
seen this?

It all comes down to this :

The OSI model is part of the 'fundamental' knowledge.  It's not 100% required 
to learn concepts above and more accurate, but it *does* provide a great 
background for learning and applying the knowledge you do gain.


Erik Goldoff
IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks,  Security 

'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '


-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone 
seen this?

OSI, per se, doesn't help anyone do anything.

But it provides a framework, so that when you're discussing some problem with 
another engineer/architect/PM and they say why don't we do 'x'? you can draw 
up something quick and say:
 the problem is here:

+-
| - what you are talking about
+-
|
+-
|   -problem is here
+- 

This can help when architecting an encryption solution, or when you're 
troubleshooting some network issue. It provides a hierarchy of requirements 
(upper levels are not going to work if something lower in the stack isn't).

Cheers
Ken


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread tony patton
We're using Symantec Endpoint Encryption, biggest pile of crap ever.

We were rolling it out to external self employed contractor types, killed 
nearly half of them.

Switched to TrueCrypt on any that didn't work, management soon realised 
what a mistake they made.
A hell of a lot easier, AND it makes you create a recovery disk before you 
start.

Don't know about the reporting in of it tho, haven't looked at it 
personally, managed to avoid the encryption fiasco.

Regards

Tony Patton
Desktop Operations Cavan
Ext 8078
Direct Dial 049 435 2878
email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com



From:   Karl Bickmore k...@ccnsconsulting.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:   27/05/2010 16:01
Subject:RE: laptop encryption



Truecrypt is pretty easy and free.
 
 Karl Bickmore
 

MSCE NT4/2K/2K3, MCP, MCP+I, MCSA 2K/2K3
LPI-1, CCNA, CCDA, Net+,Security+,Linux+
DataCore SANmelody Certified
 
6613 N Scottsdale Road 
Suite 101
Scottsdale AZ, 85250
480-553-9967 X100
k...@ccnsconsulting.com

 
Please remember CCNS is a referral based business. If you have a friend or 
colleague in need, we are happy to help. Feel free to pass along our 
contact information to anyone you think we can help. Thanks!
 
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption
 
There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that 
discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have 
bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need 
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the 
encryption piece is too costly.
 
anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will 
report encryption status back to a management station?
 
tiafah.
 
Jeff
 
 
 
 
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. The contents should 
not be copied nor disclosed to any other person. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those 
of QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration), unless otherwise
specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure,
QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration) is not responsible for the 
contents of this message nor
responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by the 
original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound and outbound 
e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any 
attachment. We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of 
any software viruses.



QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration) is regulated by the Financial 
Regulator and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK
business.



QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration) is registered in Ireland, 
registration number
240768 and is a private company limited by shares. 
Its head office is at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan.




This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have received it in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other 
use of the email by you is prohibited.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~image/jpeg

RE: SBS Remote Access - was Firewall for small biz

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
E-mail access, as well as remoting in to their work machines, and they no 
longer use VPN.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Don Kuhlman [mailto:drkuhl...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 5:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SBS Remote Access - was Firewall for small biz

We have been using CheckPoint Sofaware boxes for about 6 years. They're easy to 
use and do everything via wizards, but have  a CLI. Annual renewal is about 
$100 each device. Purchase was about $500 a piece.  Actually just switched the 
main one to a Sonicwall VZ 210 and working through issues with it now.

Just curious Dave. When you said they found SBS remote much faster than VPN, is 
that for email access, or did you used to have site to site VPN, or remote 
access VPN that they have replaced with the SBS remote access?

Don K



- Original Message 
From: David Lum david@nwea.org
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 3:06:48 PM
Subject: RE: Firewall for small biz

Sorry about the delay. This client is a law firm and I recently got them PCI 
compliant. I would like filtering and IDS if possible, but bigger emphasis is 
plug and forget - I bill these guys for perhaps 20 hours of work/year, so I 
don't want to spend 3-4hours configuring something if I don't really have to 
(however, they have never had any issue with time/expenses I can justify).

The Internet connection is some ADSL-type (download is something like 2Mbps, 
upload is paltry 512K or something). Their web server is in-house and not 
hosted elsewhere.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall for small biz

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
 I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one discussed with the PE840)
 with a 5+yr old SonicWALL SOHO firewall and I believe it's time to upgrade
 them to something more current. They used to VPN but have found SBS remote
 access much faster.

 What kinds of things should I look for in a new workgroup firewall?

  It really depends on what you're looking to have it do, and the expected load.

  Say it's a typical consumer Internet connection (cable, DSL, etc.),
and all they're doing is web surfing and email and remote access, and
they're using SBS to remote in, and they're not looking for any kind
of filtering, deep inspection, intrusion detection, etc.  In that
case, you could use an old PC running free firewall appliance
software like IPcop, pfsense, etc.  Or a SOHO gateway running
third-party firmware like DD-WRT.

  If you're looking for more advanced features... tell us what you're
looking for.  :-)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


  


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Sam Cayze
I opted for encryption at the hardware level via FDE disks.  No
performance decrease, however, no central management.  It's so easy and
set and forget, that I don't mind that.


Sam

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

 

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
that discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
have bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
encryption piece is too costly.

 

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
will report encryption status back to a management station?

 

tiafah.

 

Jeff

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Brown
I have only used bitlocker so far and have not notice performance issue.  Is
truecrypt going to punk out my portables?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:

 I opted for encryption at the hardware level via FDE disks.  No performance
 decrease, however, no central management.  It’s so easy and set and forget,
 that I don’t mind that.


 Sam



 *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:58 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* laptop encryption



 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
 bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
 piece is too costly.



 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
 report encryption status back to a management station?



 tiafah.



 Jeff











~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Brown
Thanks for all that.  I already had a quote for the symantec product.
 appreciate the heads up.  Not sure why anyone would not use TrueCrypt if it
works, unless there were some excellent reporting features that verified
that its up and running on all your portables... I'd pay for that I think,
but not for the headaches.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:11 AM, tony patton 
tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com wrote:

 We're using Symantec Endpoint Encryption, biggest pile of crap ever.

 We were rolling it out to external self employed contractor types, killed
 nearly half of them.

 Switched to TrueCrypt on any that didn't work, management soon realised
 what a mistake they made.
 A hell of a lot easier, AND it makes you create a recovery disk before you
 start.

 Don't know about the reporting in of it tho, haven't looked at it
 personally, managed to avoid the encryption fiasco.

 Regards

 Tony Patton
 Desktop Operations Cavan
 Ext 8078
 Direct Dial 049 435 2878
 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com



 From:Karl Bickmore k...@ccnsconsulting.com
 To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
 Date:27/05/2010 16:01
 Subject:RE: laptop encryption
 --



 Truecrypt is pretty easy and free.

 * **Karl Bickmore*


  MSCE NT4/2K/2K3, MCP, MCP+I, MCSA 2K/2K3
 LPI-1, CCNA, CCDA, Net+,Security+,Linux+
 DataCore SANmelody Certified
   6613 N Scottsdale Road
 Suite 101
 Scottsdale AZ, 85250
 480-553-9967 X100
 k...@ccnsconsulting.com [image: CCNSLogo]
 *Please remember CCNS is a referral based business. If you have a friend
 or colleague in need, we are happy to help. Feel free to pass along our
 contact information to anyone you think we can help. Thanks!*

 *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com 2jbr...@gmail.com] *
 Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM*
 To:* NT System Admin Issues*
 Subject:* laptop encryption

 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
 bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
 piece is too costly.

 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
 report encryption status back to a management station?

 tiafah.

 Jeff







 This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. The contents 
 should not be copied nor disclosed to any other person. Any views or opinions 
 expressed are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent 
 those of QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration), unless otherwise
 specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure,
 QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration) is not responsible for the 
 contents of this message nor
 responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by the 
 original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound and outbound 
 e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any 
 attachment. We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result 
 of any software viruses.

 

 QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration) is regulated by the Financial 
 Regulator and
 regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK
 business.

 

 QUINN-Insurance Limited (Under Administration) is registered in Ireland, 
 registration number
 240768 and is a private company limited by shares.
 Its head office is at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan.




 This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
 proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have received it in 
 error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any 
 other use of the email by you is prohibited.







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~image/jpeg

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Andrew S. Baker
When you consider why that particular reporting function is needed in the
first place, you might be less inclined to consider it a value-add...

-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker


On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for all that.  I already had a quote for the symantec product.
  appreciate the heads up.  Not sure why anyone would not use TrueCrypt if it
 works, unless there were some excellent reporting features that verified
 that its up and running on all your portables... I'd pay for that I think,
 but not for the headaches.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:11 AM, tony patton 
 tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com wrote:

 We're using Symantec Endpoint Encryption, biggest pile of crap ever.

 We were rolling it out to external self employed contractor types, killed
 nearly half of them.

 Switched to TrueCrypt on any that didn't work, management soon realised
 what a mistake they made.
 A hell of a lot easier, AND it makes you create a recovery disk before you
 start.

 Don't know about the reporting in of it tho, haven't looked at it
 personally, managed to avoid the encryption fiasco.

 Regards

 Tony Patton
 Desktop Operations Cavan
 Ext 8078
 Direct Dial 049 435 2878
 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com



 From:Karl Bickmore k...@ccnsconsulting.com
 To:NT System Admin Issues 
 ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Date:27/05/2010 16:01
 Subject:RE: laptop encryption
 --



 Truecrypt is pretty easy and free.

 * **Karl Bickmore*


  MSCE NT4/2K/2K3, MCP, MCP+I, MCSA 2K/2K3
 LPI-1, CCNA, CCDA, Net+,Security+,Linux+
 DataCore SANmelody Certified
   6613 N Scottsdale Road
 Suite 101
 Scottsdale AZ, 85250
 480-553-9967 X100
 k...@ccnsconsulting.com [image: CCNSLogo]
 *Please remember CCNS is a referral based business. If you have a friend
 or colleague in need, we are happy to help. Feel free to pass along our
 contact information to anyone you think we can help. Thanks!*

 *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com 2jbr...@gmail.com] *
 Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM*
 To:* NT System Admin Issues*
 Subject:* laptop encryption

 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
 bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
 piece is too costly.

 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
 report encryption status back to a management station?

 tiafah.

 Jeff




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~image/jpeg

RE: Modular malware

2010-05-27 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Great...

 

-sc

 

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Modular malware

 

http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8857

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Veering even more OT - was: Re: Big Changes Ahead for IT - Anyone seen this?

2010-05-27 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:10 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
 Understanding databases falls into the same category in my opinion.

  We use an app here where I keep envisioning me calling up the
salesweasel like this:

Me: Hey, do you know what database normalization is?
Salesdroid: No...
Me: Neither do your programmers!

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Bypass-Agent: EF-1;
X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
Return-Path: david@nwea.org

--_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see who has encrypted=
 disks and who doesn't. Not a free solution however.

Dave

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that =
discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have bi=
tlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need something=
 for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption piece i=
s too costly.

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will =
report encryption status back to a management station?

tiafah.

Jeff





--_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office xmlns:w=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word =
xmlns:m=3Dhttp://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml; xmlns=3Dhttp:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40

head
meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dus-ascii
meta name=3DGenerator content=3DMicrosoft Word 12 (filtered medium)
style
!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
{font-family:Cambria Math;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Times New Roman,serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Times New Roman,serif;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted Char;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Courier New;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Balloon Text Char;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:HTML Preformatted Char;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted;
font-family:Consolas;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:Balloon Text Char;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Balloon Text;
font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
--
/style
!--[if gte mso 9]xml
 o:shapedefaults v:ext=3Dedit spidmax=3D1026 /
/xml![endif]--!--[if gte mso 9]xml
 o:shapelayout v:ext=3Dedit
  o:idmap v:ext=3Dedit data=3D1 /
 /o:shapelayout/xml![endif]--
/head

body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple

div class=3DSection1

p class=3DMsoNormalspan style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,=
sans-serif;
color:#1F497D'PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see wh=
o
has encrypted disks and who doesn#8217;t. Not a free solution however.o:p=
/o:p/span/p

p class=3DMsoNormalspan style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,=
sans-serif;
color:#1F497D'o:pnbsp;/o:p/span/p

p class=3DMsoNormalspan style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,=
sans-serif;
color:#1F497D'Daveo:p/o:p/span/p

p class=3DMsoNormalspan style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,=
sans-serif;
color:#1F497D'o:pnbsp;/o:p/span/p

div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in =
0in 0in'

p class=3DMsoNormalbspan 

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Steven M. Caesare
We[1] decided to abandon PointSec encryption and go with PGP here a bit
back then of course Sym-crap-tec bought PGP...

-sc

[1] And by we I mean the gov decided and gave us marching orders...

 -Original Message-
 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: laptop encryption
 
 Accept-Language: en-US
 Content-Language: en-US
 X-MS-Has-Attach:
 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
 acceptlanguage: en-US
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
   boundary=_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2L
 KOEXCH01Amer_
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 X-Bypass-Agent: EF-1;
 X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
 Return-Path: david@nwea.org
 
 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see who has
 encrypted=  disks and who doesn't. Not a free solution however.
 
 Dave
 
 From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: laptop encryption
 
 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
that =
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
have
 bi= tlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something=  for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
 encryption piece i= s too costly.
 
 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
will
 = report encryption status back to a management station?
 
 tiafah.
 
 Jeff
 
 
 
 
 
 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml
 xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office
 xmlns:w=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word =
 xmlns:m=3Dhttp://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml;
 xmlns=3Dhttp:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40
 
 head
 meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dus-
 ascii meta name=3DGenerator content=3DMicrosoft Word 12 (filtered
 medium) style
 !--
  /* Font Definitions */
  @font-face
   {font-family:Cambria Math;
   panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
   {font-family:Calibri;
   panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
   {font-family:Tahoma;
   panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 @font-face
   {font-family:Consolas;
   panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
  /* Style Definitions */
  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
   {margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:12.0pt;
   font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} a:link,
span.MsoHyperlink
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   color:blue;
   text-decoration:underline;}
 a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   color:purple;
   text-decoration:underline;}
 p
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
   margin-right:0in;
   mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
   margin-left:0in;
   font-size:12.0pt;
   font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} pre
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted Char;
   margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:10.0pt;
   font-family:Courier New;}
 p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:Balloon Text Char;
   margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:8.0pt;
   font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.HTMLPreformattedChar
   {mso-style-name:HTML Preformatted Char;
   mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted;
   font-family:Consolas;}
 span.BalloonTextChar
   {mso-style-name:Balloon Text Char;
   mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:Balloon Text;
   font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.EmailStyle22
   {mso-style-type:personal;
   font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
   color:#1F497D;}
 span.EmailStyle23
   {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
   font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
   color:#1F497D;}
 .MsoChpDefault
   {mso-style-type:export-only;
   font-size:10.0pt;}
 @page Section1
   {size:8.5in 11.0in;
   margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
 div.Section1
   {page:Section1;}
 --
 /style
 !--[if gte mso 9]xml
  o:shapedefaults v:ext=3Dedit spidmax=3D1026 / /xml![endif]--
 !--[if gte mso 9]xml  o:shapelayout v:ext=3Dedit
   o:idmap v:ext=3Dedit data=3D1 /
  /o:shapelayout/xml![endif]--
 /head
 
 body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple
 
 div class=3DSection1
 
 p class=3DMsoNormalspan style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-
 family:Calibri,=
 sans-serif;
 color:#1F497D'PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can
see
 wh= o has encrypted disks and who doesn#8217;t. Not a free solution
 however.o:p=
 /o:p/span/p
 
 p class=3DMsoNormalspan 

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread S Powell
just to add my 2 cents,

TrueCrypt,  We've used it on our Dell laptops for the last two years,
and have not had any issues.  every upgrade has gone well without
issue.




Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:43, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
 We[1] decided to abandon PointSec encryption and go with PGP here a bit
 back then of course Sym-crap-tec bought PGP...

 -sc

 [1] And by we I mean the gov decided and gave us marching orders...

 -Original Message-
 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: laptop encryption

 Accept-Language: en-US
 Content-Language: en-US
 X-MS-Has-Attach:
 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
 acceptlanguage: en-US
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
       boundary=_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2L
 KOEXCH01Amer_
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 X-Bypass-Agent: EF-1;
 X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
 Return-Path: david@nwea.org

 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see who has
 encrypted=  disks and who doesn't. Not a free solution however.

 Dave

 From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: laptop encryption

 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
 that =
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
 have
 bi= tlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something=  for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
 encryption piece i= s too costly.

 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
 will
 = report encryption status back to a management station?

 tiafah.

 Jeff





 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml
 xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office
 xmlns:w=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word =
 xmlns:m=3Dhttp://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml;
 xmlns=3Dhttp:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40

 head
 meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dus-
 ascii meta name=3DGenerator content=3DMicrosoft Word 12 (filtered
 medium) style
 !--
  /* Font Definitions */
 �...@font-face
       {font-family:Cambria Math;
       panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
       {font-family:Calibri;
       panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
       {font-family:Tahoma;
       panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 @font-face
       {font-family:Consolas;
       panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
  /* Style Definitions */
  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
       {margin:0in;
       margin-bottom:.0001pt;
       font-size:12.0pt;
       font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} a:link,
 span.MsoHyperlink
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       color:blue;
       text-decoration:underline;}
 a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       color:purple;
       text-decoration:underline;}
 p
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
       margin-right:0in;
       mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
       margin-left:0in;
       font-size:12.0pt;
       font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} pre
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted Char;
       margin:0in;
       margin-bottom:.0001pt;
       font-size:10.0pt;
       font-family:Courier New;}
 p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:Balloon Text Char;
       margin:0in;
       margin-bottom:.0001pt;
       font-size:8.0pt;
       font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.HTMLPreformattedChar
       {mso-style-name:HTML Preformatted Char;
       mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted;
       font-family:Consolas;}
 span.BalloonTextChar
       {mso-style-name:Balloon Text Char;
       mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:Balloon Text;
       font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.EmailStyle22
       {mso-style-type:personal;
       font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
       color:#1F497D;}
 span.EmailStyle23
       {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
       font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
       color:#1F497D;}
 .MsoChpDefault
       {mso-style-type:export-only;
       font-size:10.0pt;}
 @page Section1
       {size:8.5in 11.0in;
       margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
 div.Section1
       {page:Section1;}
 --
 /style
 !--[if gte mso 9]xml
  o:shapedefaults v:ext=3Dedit spidmax=3D1026 / /xml![endif]--
 !--[if gte mso 9]xml  o:shapelayout v:ext=3Dedit
   o:idmap v:ext=3Dedit data=3D1 /
  /o:shapelayout/xml![endif]--
 /head

 body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple

 div class=3DSection1

 p class=3DMsoNormalspan 

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Peter van Houten

I am a TrueCrypt fan with one caveat; we never use full-disk encryption
for our clients but rather create an encrypted file container which, when
mounted as a separate drive, becomes the repository for all data,
including but not limited to Outlook PSTs or Thunderbird profile and
mail files, Firefox profile  cache, mobile phone sync data and all
documents.

Still working on moving Skype and other IM data on to the encrypted
drive and using an on-screen keyboard program to enter the encrypted
drive's password to try to defeat key loggers.

Besides the vulnerability of full-disk encryption to monitors such as
Evil Maid, I have seen fully-encrypted disks presented to Windows, to
which the response is Format Drive XX?. Too risky if laptop is abroad
and needs to be attended to by an ignorant technician.

--
Peter van Houten

On the 27 May, 2010 16:57, Jeff Brown wrote the following:

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
that discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
have bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
encryption piece is too costly.

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
will report encryption status back to a management station?

tiafah.

Jeff


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Applicability of the OSI model (was: Big Changes)

2010-05-27 Thread Steven Peck
In our recent netmon class, we reviewed the OSI model and and how to
use it to help understand traces.  Of course I do so few netmon traces
that such things often fall to the I should remember this category
when looking at all those pretty numbers when I actually need to
analyze one.

Steven Peck

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com 
 wrote:
 They also read memory and write memory and automatically increase the 
 execution index (PCW for some processors).

  Touche.

  You're just getting back at me for my message about how ARP works.  ;-)

 -- Ben

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
How many laptops and how many locations? Many remote users? How does it work 
when a user forgets their password?

Dave

-Original Message-
From: S Powell [mailto:powe...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: laptop encryption

just to add my 2 cents,

TrueCrypt,  We've used it on our Dell laptops for the last two years,
and have not had any issues.  every upgrade has gone well without
issue.




Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:43, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
 We[1] decided to abandon PointSec encryption and go with PGP here a bit
 back then of course Sym-crap-tec bought PGP...

 -sc

 [1] And by we I mean the gov decided and gave us marching orders...

 -Original Message-
 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: laptop encryption

 Accept-Language: en-US
 Content-Language: en-US
 X-MS-Has-Attach:
 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
 acceptlanguage: en-US
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
       boundary=_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2L
 KOEXCH01Amer_
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 X-Bypass-Agent: EF-1;
 X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
 Return-Path: david@nwea.org

 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see who has
 encrypted=  disks and who doesn't. Not a free solution however.

 Dave

 From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: laptop encryption

 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
 that =
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
 have
 bi= tlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something=  for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
 encryption piece i= s too costly.

 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
 will
 = report encryption status back to a management station?

 tiafah.

 Jeff





 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml
 xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office
 xmlns:w=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word =
 xmlns:m=3Dhttp://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml;
 xmlns=3Dhttp:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40

 head
 meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dus-
 ascii meta name=3DGenerator content=3DMicrosoft Word 12 (filtered
 medium) style
 !--
  /* Font Definitions */
 �...@font-face
       {font-family:Cambria Math;
       panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
       {font-family:Calibri;
       panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
       {font-family:Tahoma;
       panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 @font-face
       {font-family:Consolas;
       panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
  /* Style Definitions */
  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
       {margin:0in;
       margin-bottom:.0001pt;
       font-size:12.0pt;
       font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} a:link,
 span.MsoHyperlink
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       color:blue;
       text-decoration:underline;}
 a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       color:purple;
       text-decoration:underline;}
 p
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
       margin-right:0in;
       mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
       margin-left:0in;
       font-size:12.0pt;
       font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} pre
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted Char;
       margin:0in;
       margin-bottom:.0001pt;
       font-size:10.0pt;
       font-family:Courier New;}
 p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
       {mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:Balloon Text Char;
       margin:0in;
       margin-bottom:.0001pt;
       font-size:8.0pt;
       font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.HTMLPreformattedChar
       {mso-style-name:HTML Preformatted Char;
       mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted;
       font-family:Consolas;}
 span.BalloonTextChar
       {mso-style-name:Balloon Text Char;
       mso-style-priority:99;
       mso-style-link:Balloon Text;
       font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.EmailStyle22
       {mso-style-type:personal;
       font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
       color:#1F497D;}
 span.EmailStyle23
       {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
       font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
       color:#1F497D;}
 .MsoChpDefault
       {mso-style-type:export-only;
       font-size:10.0pt;}
 @page Section1
       {size:8.5in 11.0in;
       margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
 div.Section1
       {page:Section1;}
 --
 /style
 !--[if gte mso 9]xml

Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread David W. McSpadden
Pong...

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Mathew Shember
Ping...

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

Pong...

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Steven M. Caesare
(CC'd you directly)

I saw it on-list..

-sc

 -Original Message-
 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Ping...
 
 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm
 sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to
 begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because y'all won't
see it.
 
 -Paul
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Sean Houston
I like how you don't just assume we're all ignoring you...

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

 -Paul

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




-- 
Sean Houston
216-798-4476
IT Specialist
CompTIA A+, Security+, Network+, Server+

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Steve Ens
tabletennis

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Maglinger, Paul
I guess one could make that assumption, but I don't see how anyone could
ignore me.  grin

 

What was weird is that I wasn't even getting the OOOs.  I'll do some
snooping into our spam filters and see if it's dropping some of these
off into the ether.

 

Thanks folks!

 

From: Sean Houston [mailto:seanthous...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ping...

 

I like how you don't just assume we're all ignoring you...

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com
wrote:

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




-- 
Sean Houston
216-798-4476
IT Specialist
CompTIA A+, Security+, Network+, Server+

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Richard Stovall
Tough crowd.  Gotta have thick skin to play here...

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Sean Houston seanthous...@gmail.comwrote:

 I like how you don't just assume we're all ignoring you...


 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

 -Paul

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




 --
 Sean Houston
 216-798-4476
 IT Specialist
 CompTIA A+, Security+, Network+, Server+







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Dave Florea
Pong
--Original Message--
From: Mathew Shember
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...
Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

Ping...

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

Pong...

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Sent slowly via my BBerry...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Speaking of Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
Speaking of Ping. 

I'm trying to determine if something is goofy with our new fiber-wan
installation.  Ping times across it are 1ms, which is good.  But when
moving data over the fiber-wan and saturating it for test purposes (the
link is capped at 15mb right now), I see pings jumping up to 25ms and
averaging around 20ms, with an occasional time out too (1 of every 10 ping
fails on averge when the line is saturdated during testing). I'm inquiring
with then fiber company about this as it doesn't seem normal to me??  So
far they are saying nothing is wrong.

J




Original Message:
-
From: Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:13:02 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Ping...


Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Manuel Santos
The machine that goes Ping...

2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.com

 Pong
 --Original Message--
 From: Mathew Shember
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Ping...
 Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

 Ping...

 -Original Message-
 From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Ping...

 Pong...

 -Original Message-
 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Ping...

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

 -Paul

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



 Sent slowly via my BBerry...
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Speaking of Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Many routers prioritize ICMP traffic below standard traffic. Thus ping
(and tracert) times do not always indicate what normal packets see.

-sc

 -Original Message-
 From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:32 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Speaking of Ping...
 
 Speaking of Ping.
 
 I'm trying to determine if something is goofy with our new fiber-wan
 installation.  Ping times across it are 1ms, which is good.  But when
moving
 data over the fiber-wan and saturating it for test purposes (the link
is capped
 at 15mb right now), I see pings jumping up to 25ms and averaging
around
 20ms, with an occasional time out too (1 of every 10 ping fails on
averge
 when the line is saturdated during testing). I'm inquiring with then
fiber
 company about this as it doesn't seem normal to me??  So far they are
saying
 nothing is wrong.
 
 J
 
 
 
 
 Original Message:
 -
 From: Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:13:02 -0500
 To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Subject: Ping...
 
 
 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm
 sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to
 begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because y'all won't
see it.
 
 -Paul
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~
 
 
 
 mail2web.com - What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
 http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint
 
 
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jonathan Link
We're a PGP shop...hoping Symantec doesn't make it as craptacular as its
other products.
The central management is very important to us.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:53 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:

 How many laptops and how many locations? Many remote users? How does it
 work when a user forgets their password?

 Dave

 -Original Message-
 From: S Powell [mailto:powe...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:49 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: Re: laptop encryption

 just to add my 2 cents,

 TrueCrypt,  We've used it on our Dell laptops for the last two years,
 and have not had any issues.  every upgrade has gone well without
 issue.




 Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.



 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:43, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com
 wrote:
  We[1] decided to abandon PointSec encryption and go with PGP here a bit
  back then of course Sym-crap-tec bought PGP...
 
  -sc
 
  [1] And by we I mean the gov decided and gave us marching orders...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
  Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:33 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: laptop encryption
 
  Accept-Language: en-US
  Content-Language: en-US
  X-MS-Has-Attach:
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
  acceptlanguage: en-US
  Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2L
  KOEXCH01Amer_
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  X-Bypass-Agent: EF-1;
  X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
  Return-Path: david@nwea.org
 
  --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see who has
  encrypted=  disks and who doesn't. Not a free solution however.
 
  Dave
 
  From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: laptop encryption
 
  There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
  that =
  discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
  have
  bi= tlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
  something=  for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
  encryption piece i= s too costly.
 
  anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
  will
  = report encryption status back to a management station?
 
  tiafah.
 
  Jeff
 
 
 
 
 
   --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
  Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml
  xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office
  xmlns:w=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word =
  xmlns:m=3Dhttp://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml;
  xmlns=3Dhttp:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40
 
  head
  meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dus-
  ascii meta name=3DGenerator content=3DMicrosoft Word 12 (filtered
  medium) style
  !--
   /* Font Definitions */
   @font-face
{font-family:Cambria Math;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
  @font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
  @font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
  @font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
   /* Style Definitions */
   p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} a:link,
  span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
  a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
  p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted Char;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Courier New;}
  p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Balloon Text Char;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
  span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:HTML Preformatted Char;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted;
font-family:Consolas;}
  span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:Balloon Text Char;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Balloon Text;
font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
  span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;

Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Jonathan Link
As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list...

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Manuel Santos nel...@gmail.com wrote:

 The machine that goes Ping...

 2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.com

 Pong
 --Original Message--
 From: Mathew Shember
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Ping...
 Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

 Ping...

 -Original Message-
 From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Ping...

 Pong...

 -Original Message-
 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Ping...

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

 -Paul

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



 Sent slowly via my BBerry...
  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~








~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Andy Shook
And the irony of that just kills me

Shook

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ping...

As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list...
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Manuel Santos 
nel...@gmail.commailto:nel...@gmail.com wrote:
The machine that goes Ping...
2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.commailto:blazer...@gmail.com

Pong
--Original Message--
From: Mathew Shember
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...
Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

Ping...

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

Pong...

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Sent slowly via my BBerry...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~











~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
Same here, we are currently deploying PGP and hope the same.

Dave

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: laptop encryption

We're a PGP shop...hoping Symantec doesn't make it as craptacular as its other 
products.
The central management is very important to us.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:53 AM, David Lum 
david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org wrote:
How many laptops and how many locations? Many remote users? How does it work 
when a user forgets their password?

Dave

-Original Message-
From: S Powell [mailto:powe...@gmail.commailto:powe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: laptop encryption

just to add my 2 cents,

TrueCrypt,  We've used it on our Dell laptops for the last two years,
and have not had any issues.  every upgrade has gone well without
issue.




Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:43, Steven M. Caesare 
scaes...@caesare.commailto:scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
 We[1] decided to abandon PointSec encryption and go with PGP here a bit
 back then of course Sym-crap-tec bought PGP...

 -sc

 [1] And by we I mean the gov decided and gave us marching orders...

 -Original Message-
 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: laptop encryption

 Accept-Language: en-US
 Content-Language: en-US
 X-MS-Has-Attach:
 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
 acceptlanguage: en-US
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
   boundary=_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2L
 KOEXCH01Amer_
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 X-Bypass-Agent: EF-1;
 X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
 Return-Path: david@nwea.org

 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 PGP encryption reports to a management station, I can see who has
 encrypted=  disks and who doesn't. Not a free solution however.

 Dave

 From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.commailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:58 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: laptop encryption

 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
 that =
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
 have
 bi= tlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something=  for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
 encryption piece i= s too costly.

 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
 will
 = report encryption status back to a management station?

 tiafah.

 Jeff





 --_000_038712CAF487CE46B2323FE43D6224B781E2E43FC2LKOEXCH01Amer_
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml
 xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office
 xmlns:w=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word =
 xmlns:m=3Dhttp://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml;
 xmlns=3Dhttp:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40

 head
 meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dus-
 ascii meta name=3DGenerator content=3DMicrosoft Word 12 (filtered
 medium) style
 !--
  /* Font Definitions */
  @font-face
   {font-family:Cambria Math;
   panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
   {font-family:Calibri;
   panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 @font-face
   {font-family:Tahoma;
   panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 @font-face
   {font-family:Consolas;
   panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
  /* Style Definitions */
  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
   {margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:12.0pt;
   font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} a:link,
 span.MsoHyperlink
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   color:blue;
   text-decoration:underline;}
 a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   color:purple;
   text-decoration:underline;}
 p
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
   margin-right:0in;
   mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
   margin-left:0in;
   font-size:12.0pt;
   font-family:Times New Roman,serif;} pre
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted Char;
   margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:10.0pt;
   font-family:Courier New;}
 p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
   {mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:Balloon Text Char;
   margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:8.0pt;
   font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;}
 span.HTMLPreformattedChar
   {mso-style-name:HTML Preformatted Char;
   mso-style-priority:99;
   mso-style-link:HTML Preformatted;
   font-family:Consolas;}
 span.BalloonTextChar
   {mso-style-name:Balloon 

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Ben Schorr
We use TrueCrypt.  Even posted a little article on how to do it for our
clients.  http://www.officeforlawyers.com/lawtech/truecrypt.htm
http://www.officeforlawyers.com/lawtech/truecrypt.htm  

 

I haven't noticed any performance issues (or any reporting features for
that matter) on my netbooks.

 

Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
__
Roland Schorr  Tower
www.rolandschorr.com http://www.rolandschorr.com/ 
b...@rolandschorr.com mailto:b...@rolandschorr.com 

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bschorr http://www.twitter.com/bschorr


Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/rolandschorr
http://www.facebook.com/rolandschorr  

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 04:58
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

 

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
that discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
have bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
encryption piece is too costly.

 

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
will report encryption status back to a management station?

 

tiafah.

 

Jeff

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Mike Gill
IT seems like you're trading one caveat for another, which is trusting that
the user will always put sensitive data in the container. Also, this does
nothing to protect the OS being compromised with key loggers, which may take
less time than Evil Maid and still provide the encryption key. I'm sure it
could be emailed in the background as well so the attacker who already
copied the container will not need to come back for the either.

You could add the ATA password as a second layer. On my Latitude, the
password is prompted even when resuming. I have seen this configurable on
other notebooks. They can't install a boot loader if they can't access the
drive. This is assuming they are trying to be covert about it all. Resetting
the ATA password would be fairly noticeable. I'm not aware of any method to
bypass it.

-- 
Mike Gill


-Original Message-
From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: laptop encryption

I am a TrueCrypt fan with one caveat; we never use full-disk encryption
for our clients but rather create an encrypted file container which, when
mounted as a separate drive, becomes the repository for all data,
including but not limited to Outlook PSTs or Thunderbird profile and
mail files, Firefox profile  cache, mobile phone sync data and all
documents.

Still working on moving Skype and other IM data on to the encrypted
drive and using an on-screen keyboard program to enter the encrypted
drive's password to try to defeat key loggers.

Besides the vulnerability of full-disk encryption to monitors such as
Evil Maid, I have seen fully-encrypted disks presented to Windows, to
which the response is Format Drive XX?. Too risky if laptop is abroad
and needs to be attended to by an ignorant technician.

--
Peter van Houten



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Steven Peck
Yet you are still around kicking.  Zombie Shook?  :)

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote:
 And the irony of that just kills me….



 Shook



 From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:17 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Ping...



 As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list...

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Manuel Santos nel...@gmail.com wrote:

 The machine that goes Ping...

 2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.com



 Pong

 --Original Message--
 From: Mathew Shember
 To: NT System Admin Issues

 ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Ping...
 Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

 Ping...

 -Original Message-

 From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues

 Subject: RE: Ping...

 Pong...

 -Original Message-

 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues

 Subject: Ping...

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

 -Paul

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


 Sent slowly via my BBerry...

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
http://www.ugoplayer.com/games/pong.html



Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/


From: Manuel Santos [mailto:nel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ping...

The machine that goes Ping...
2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.commailto:blazer...@gmail.com
Pong
--Original Message--
From: Mathew Shember
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...
Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

Ping...

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

Pong...

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Sent slowly via my BBerry...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~







Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.


Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Webster
We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! J

 

 

Webster

 

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Subject: RE: Ping...

 

And the irony of that just kills me..

 

Shook

 

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Ping...

 

As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list...


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Andy Shook
That's just mean

Shook

From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! :)


Webster

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Subject: RE: Ping...

And the irony of that just kills me

Shook

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Ping...

As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list...





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
LOL, thanks Webster, you just made me laugh out loud!!

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:

  We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! J





 Webster



 *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
 *Subject:* RE: Ping...



 And the irony of that just kills me….



 Shook



 *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
 *Subject:* Re: Ping...



 As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list...








-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Webster
mean as in that is average for me? J

 

 

Webster

 

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Subject: RE: Ping...

 

That's just mean..

 

Shook

 

From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] 
Subject: RE: Ping...

 

We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! J

 

 

Webster

 

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Subject: RE: Ping...

 

And the irony of that just kills me..

 

Shook

 

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Ping...

 

As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list... 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

SharePoint work

2010-05-27 Thread Michael White
Anyone in the Mount Vernon, WA area interested in doing some SharePoint 2010
work?  If so, please contact me offline.

-- 
--
Michael S. White
mswhite...@gmail.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Bill Songstad
I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the Nero
disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a recommendation for
software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can download a full version of
Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I have to pay, I want something a
little less full of baloney.

Any feedback would be appreciated,

Bill

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Peter van Houten

The OP was asking about an add-on product for laptops that didn't have
Bitlocker and the Evil Maid type attack was specifically targeting
TrueCrypt whole-disk encryption as I remember. YMMV with other
encrypting disk systems.

It is also difficult to cover user's foibles completely but I've found
that locking the desktop to write access, setting the My Documents path
to the encrypted container and a good dose of education go a long way.

I've just had too many whole-encrypted disks (mainly flash drives, mind)
come back with the user saying When I plugged it in, Windows formatted
it...). With whole-disk encryption, TrueCrypt writes the encryption
loader into the same place as everyone else, sectors 2 - 63 on cylinder
0, which obviously makes it non-standard and with laptops having to be
repaired by foreign hands, I prefer the encrypted container approach

I don't even bother with complex XP login passwords; simply the same as
the username. Far too simple to bypass. I do insist that the encryption
password be severely complex and as it is the only password they need
remember, it hasn't hasn't proved to be a problem.

--
Peter van Houten

On the 27 May, 2010 19:26, Mike Gill wrote the following:

IT seems like you're trading one caveat for another, which is trusting that
the user will always put sensitive data in the container. Also, this does
nothing to protect the OS being compromised with key loggers, which may take
less time than Evil Maid and still provide the encryption key. I'm sure it
could be emailed in the background as well so the attacker who already
copied the container will not need to come back for the either.

You could add the ATA password as a second layer. On my Latitude, the
password is prompted even when resuming. I have seen this configurable on
other notebooks. They can't install a boot loader if they can't access the
drive. This is assuming they are trying to be covert about it all. Resetting
the ATA password would be fairly noticeable. I'm not aware of any method to
bypass it.

--
Mike Gill


-Original Message-
From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: laptop encryption

I am a TrueCrypt fan with one caveat; we never use full-disk encryption
for our clients but rather create an encrypted file container which, when
mounted as a separate drive, becomes the repository for all data,
including but not limited to Outlook PSTs or Thunderbird profile and
mail files, Firefox profile  cache, mobile phone sync data and all
documents.

Still working on moving Skype and other IM data on to the encrypted
drive and using an on-screen keyboard program to enter the encrypted
drive's password to try to defeat key loggers.

Besides the vulnerability of full-disk encryption to monitors such as
Evil Maid, I have seen fully-encrypted disks presented to Windows, to
which the response is Format Drive XX?. Too risky if laptop is abroad
and needs to be attended to by an ignorant technician.

--
Peter van Houten


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread S Powell
Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:53, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
 How many laptops and how many locations? Many remote users? How does it work 
 when a user forgets their password?

 Dave


about 30 laptops, one location, although people bound around the
region quite a bit, we use truecrypt Full disk encryption, and the
password ah yes... that's why we have the rescue disk, all the
ISO's are saved, and I burn them as needed (not often).

never had a user forget.  we use a passphrase.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Daniel Rodriguez
Go out to majorgeeks.com. they have a slew of freeware that you can try.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the Nero
 disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a recommendation for
 software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can download a full version of
 Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I have to pay, I want something a
 little less full of baloney.

 Any feedback would be appreciated,

 Bill







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Manuel Santos
I would suggest you AShampoo, that has even a free version

2010/5/27 Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com

 I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the Nero
 disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a recommendation for
 software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can download a full version of
 Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I have to pay, I want something a
 little less full of baloney.

 Any feedback would be appreciated,

 Bill







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread David Mazzaccaro
cdburnerxp
 



From: Manuel Santos [mailto:nel...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: DVD burning software


I would suggest you AShampoo, that has even a free version


2010/5/27 Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com


I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't
have the Nero disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a
recommendation for software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can
download a full version of Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I
have to pay, I want something a little less full of baloney.
 
Any feedback would be appreciated,
 

Bill

 



 


 

 


.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Peter van Houten

http://www.imgburn.com

--
Peter van Houten

On the 27 May, 2010 20:04, Bill Songstad wrote the following:

I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the
Nero disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a
recommendation for software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can
download a full version of Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I
have to pay, I want something a little less full of baloney.
Any feedback would be appreciated,
Bill


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
Yeah you can get away with it in that kind of environment, we (briefly) looked 
at it and it wouldn't be manageable for us. 450 users, 25+ travel almost 
constantly, 3 offices in 3 states...

For small shops Truecrypt is likely perfect.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: S Powell [mailto:powe...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: laptop encryption

Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:53, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
 How many laptops and how many locations? Many remote users? How does it work 
 when a user forgets their password?

 Dave


about 30 laptops, one location, although people bound around the
region quite a bit, we use truecrypt Full disk encryption, and the
password ah yes... that's why we have the rescue disk, all the
ISO's are saved, and I burn them as needed (not often).

never had a user forget.  we use a passphrase.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jonathan Link
Encryption has no bearing on whether a keylogger is installed on a sytem
protected by whole disk encryption.  WDE encrypts the disk while it is at
rest.  A keylogger can be installed on WDE protected drive as easily as one
that is not.  I agree with your assertion, that leaving part of the disk
unencrypted requires a bit of trust on the part of the user, and is not
easily verifiable whether the user is doing the right thing with data

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Gill lis...@canbyfoursquare.comwrote:

 IT seems like you're trading one caveat for another, which is trusting that
 the user will always put sensitive data in the container. Also, this does
 nothing to protect the OS being compromised with key loggers, which may
 take
 less time than Evil Maid and still provide the encryption key. I'm sure it
 could be emailed in the background as well so the attacker who already
 copied the container will not need to come back for the either.

 You could add the ATA password as a second layer. On my Latitude, the
 password is prompted even when resuming. I have seen this configurable on
 other notebooks. They can't install a boot loader if they can't access the
 drive. This is assuming they are trying to be covert about it all.
 Resetting
 the ATA password would be fairly noticeable. I'm not aware of any method to
 bypass it.

 --
 Mike Gill


 -Original Message-
 From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:48 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: laptop encryption

 I am a TrueCrypt fan with one caveat; we never use full-disk encryption
 for our clients but rather create an encrypted file container which, when
 mounted as a separate drive, becomes the repository for all data,
 including but not limited to Outlook PSTs or Thunderbird profile and
 mail files, Firefox profile  cache, mobile phone sync data and all
 documents.

 Still working on moving Skype and other IM data on to the encrypted
 drive and using an on-screen keyboard program to enter the encrypted
 drive's password to try to defeat key loggers.

 Besides the vulnerability of full-disk encryption to monitors such as
 Evil Maid, I have seen fully-encrypted disks presented to Windows, to
 which the response is Format Drive XX?. Too risky if laptop is abroad
 and needs to be attended to by an ignorant technician.

 --
 Peter van Houten



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Jonathan Link
+1

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Peter van Houten peter...@gmail.comwrote:

 http://www.imgburn.com

 --
 Peter van Houten

 On the 27 May, 2010 20:04, Bill Songstad wrote the following:

 I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the
 Nero disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a
 recommendation for software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can
 download a full version of Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I
 have to pay, I want something a little less full of baloney.
 Any feedback would be appreciated,
 Bill


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Carol Fee
+2

CFee
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DVD burning software

+1
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Peter van Houten 
peter...@gmail.commailto:peter...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.imgburn.comhttp://www.imgburn.com/

--
Peter van Houten

On the 27 May, 2010 20:04, Bill Songstad wrote the following:

I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the
Nero disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a
recommendation for software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can
download a full version of Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I
have to pay, I want something a little less full of baloney.
Any feedback would be appreciated,
Bill

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Mike Gill
Are you just trying to burn data to DVD's? Or is video part of the equation?

 

http://infrarecorder.org/

http://www.imgburn.com/

http://cdburnerxp.se/

 

All free.

 

-- 
Mike Gill

 

From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: DVD burning software

 

I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the Nero
disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a recommendation for
software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can download a full version of
Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I have to pay, I want something a
little less full of baloney.

 

Any feedback would be appreciated,

 

Bill

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Bill Songstad
It looks like I'm going to need to make playable DVDs.  I'm going to try out
imgburn  and maybe cdburnerxp.

Thanks for all the tips everyone.

-Bill

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Mike Gill lis...@canbyfoursquare.comwrote:

  Are you just trying to burn data to DVD’s? Or is video part of the
 equation?



 http://infrarecorder.org/

 http://www.imgburn.com/

 http://cdburnerxp.se/



 All free.



 --
 Mike Gill



 *From:* Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:04 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* OT: DVD burning software



 I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the Nero
 disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a recommendation for
 software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can download a full version of
 Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I have to pay, I want something a
 little less full of baloney.



 Any feedback would be appreciated,



 Bill











~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread James Winzenz

+1

 

I have used CDBurnerXP and ImgBurn, and I actually prefer ImgBurn.

Thanks,
 
James Winzenz



 
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:08:36 +0200
 From: peter...@gmail.com
 To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Subject: Re: OT: DVD burning software
 
 http://www.imgburn.com
 
 --
 Peter van Houten
 
 On the 27 May, 2010 20:04, Bill Songstad wrote the following:
  I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the
  Nero disk that came with the DVD burner. Does anybody have a
  recommendation for software to use in lieu of Nero? I know I can
  download a full version of Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I
  have to pay, I want something a little less full of baloney.
  Any feedback would be appreciated,
  Bill
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
  
_
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendarocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread David Lum
What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin account - 
assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers. Previously here 
they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I'm thinking it's time to 
change that practice but I'll need some ammo and a plan before I have any hope 
of changing this.

My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD 
structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.

Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max per 
domain max.
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Phil Brutsche
My thoughts:

No domain admins unless there is no other way to do what you need to.

If they need to do AD administration, use LDAP OU ACLs aka delegation.

They should only get permissions delegated to them if AD management is
part of their duties.

On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, David Lum wrote:
 What are your guy’s prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin
 account – assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers.
 Previously here they’ve just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I’m
 thinking it’s time to change that practice but I’ll need some ammo and a
 plan before I have any hope of changing this.
 
 My thinking is along the line of “need to know what’s going in this AD
 structure” as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.
 
 Thoughts comments? I’m thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max
 per domain max.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Salvador Manzo
In addition, use Restricted Group GPOs as much as possible if
distributed local administration of machines is required.  Personally, I
would go a step further and separate admin level accounts of any kind
from the normal, day-to-day logins.  So, for example, at a minimum

Joe Employee
Jemployee (normal login, same user rights as everyone else on the
network)
Jemployee_admin (elevated account, either Domain Admin or what have you)


This will reduce your exposure when doing things daily, but does require
that people not circumvent it in the name of ease of use (or, what I
would call laziness.)

-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

My thoughts:

No domain admins unless there is no other way to do what you need to.

If they need to do AD administration, use LDAP OU ACLs aka delegation.

They should only get permissions delegated to them if AD management is
part of their duties.

On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, David Lum wrote:
 What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin
 account - assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers.
 Previously here they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin,
I'm
 thinking it's time to change that practice but I'll need some ammo and
a
 plan before I have any hope of changing this.
 
 My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD
 structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.
 
 Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts
max
 per domain max.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 27 May 2010 at 10:00, Bill Lambert  wrote:

 TrueCrypt...free.
 
 http://www.truecrypt.org/

+5

Latest version even supports OS X 10.6.
--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 27 May 2010 at 11:13, Maglinger, Paul  wrote:

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

When I wonder about stuff like this, I just go to the list archives at 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/?forum=ntsysadmin ... I can see if there 
has been no list traffic for hours or days and also find my own postings.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Roger Wright
I've frequently recommended Deepburner.  Not sure if the free version
will meet all your needs, but it works well for me.


Die dulci fruere!

Roger Wright
___




On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com wrote:
 It looks like I'm going to need to make playable DVDs.  I'm going to try out
 imgburn  and maybe cdburnerxp.

 Thanks for all the tips everyone.

 -Bill

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Mike Gill lis...@canbyfoursquare.com
 wrote:

 Are you just trying to burn data to DVD’s? Or is video part of the
 equation?



 http://infrarecorder.org/

 http://www.imgburn.com/

 http://cdburnerxp.se/



 All free.



 --
 Mike Gill



 From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:04 AM

 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: OT: DVD burning software



 I just rebuilt a XP workstation only to discover that I don't have the
 Nero disk that came with the DVD burner.  Does anybody have a recommendation
 for software to use in lieu of Nero?  I know I can download a full version
 of Nero, but it is so full of bloat that if I have to pay, I want something
 a little less full of baloney.



 Any feedback would be appreciated,



 Bill













~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 27 May 2010 at 11:39, James Winzenz  wrote:

 +1
 
 I have used CDBurnerXP and ImgBurn, and I actually prefer ImgBurn.

I'm the other way, have tried both and fall back on CDBXP.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Why do you guys do this to me...   I have too much to do than be
distracted by this!  J

 

From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

 

http://www.ugoplayer.com/games/pong.html

 

 

Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com BLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com 
www.eaglemds.com BLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/  



From: Manuel Santos [mailto:nel...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ping...

 

The machine that goes Ping...

2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.com

Pong

--Original Message--
From: Mathew Shember
To: NT System Admin Issues

ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...
Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

Ping...

-Original Message-

From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Ping...

Pong...

-Original Message-

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Sent slowly via my BBerry...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 

 

 

 



Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute
or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any
action in reliance on the information that it contains.



Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute
or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any
action in reliance on the information that it contains.

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Internal routing

2010-05-27 Thread mqcarp
OK here is what is happening. When you go to one of the internal sites
through a browser, it stalls, and then says it can not be reached, but
what I noticed is that it is trying to route to the public IP address,
not the DMZ address, which is what the internal DNS should be doing.
So for some reason it has determined that it can not route that way
and is sending the request to the DNS forwarding address. If you do an
nslookup for the site, it brings up the DMZ address. Very odd. We are
going to blow out the DNS zones. Possibly the records are corrupt?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Good idea.  Glad I thought of it!

-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ping...

On 27 May 2010 at 11:13, Maglinger, Paul  wrote:

 Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
 I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it
to
 the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
 y'all won't see it.

When I wonder about stuff like this, I just go to the list archives at 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/?forum=ntsysadmin ... I can see
if there 
has been no list traffic for hours or days and also find my own
postings.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Peter van Houten

I remember that, when I first tried CDBXP, I liked it but the
requirement for .NET became a problem for certain clients. Do they still
have the .NET requirement?

One of ImgBurn's strong points is that the author (who wrote DVD
Decrypter) really seems to understand removable media and has built in a
number of very useful features which will prompt you with suggestions.

--
Peter van Houten

On the 27 May, 2010 21:19, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote the following:

On 27 May 2010 at 11:39, James Winzenz  wrote:


+1

I have used CDBurnerXP and ImgBurn, and I actually prefer ImgBurn.


I'm the other way, have tried both and fall back on CDBXP.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Internal routing

2010-05-27 Thread Richard Stovall
How did you determine that it is trying to route to the public IP address.
 By running netstat one one of the clients?

If you do an nslookup pointed to an internal DNS server on one of the
clients having the problem, it resolves the correct DMZ ip, right?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, mqcarp mqcarpen...@gmail.com wrote:

 OK here is what is happening. When you go to one of the internal sites
 through a browser, it stalls, and then says it can not be reached, but
 what I noticed is that it is trying to route to the public IP address,
 not the DMZ address, which is what the internal DNS should be doing.
 So for some reason it has determined that it can not route that way
 and is sending the request to the DNS forwarding address. If you do an
 nslookup for the site, it brings up the DMZ address. Very odd. We are
 going to blow out the DNS zones. Possibly the records are corrupt?

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: OT: DVD burning software

2010-05-27 Thread Jonathan Link
Those certain clients need to get over it.
.Net isn't going anywhere
The ribbon is here to stay.
Change is the only constant.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Peter van Houten peter...@gmail.comwrote:

 I remember that, when I first tried CDBXP, I liked it but the
 requirement for .NET became a problem for certain clients. Do they still
 have the .NET requirement?

 One of ImgBurn's strong points is that the author (who wrote DVD
 Decrypter) really seems to understand removable media and has built in a
 number of very useful features which will prompt you with suggestions.

 --
 Peter van Houten

 On the 27 May, 2010 21:19, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote the following:

 On 27 May 2010 at 11:39, James Winzenz  wrote:

 +1

 I have used CDBurnerXP and ImgBurn, and I actually prefer ImgBurn.


 I'm the other way, have tried both and fall back on CDBXP.

 --
 Angus Scott-Fleming
 GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
 1-520-290-5038
 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Alex Eckelberry
Not the answer you're looking for, but what about a different thought?  Don't 
keep anything of value on a laptop.  Only run laptops client/server (VPN or TS 
or whatever).

Alex


From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that 
discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have 
bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need something 
for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption piece is too 
costly.

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will 
report encryption status back to a management station?

tiafah.

Jeff





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Free, Bob
2-3 is max for any environment IMO. Everything else should be dome with
delegations. They must be your most proficient admins, not any old new
hire.

 

Check out some of joe Richard's rants about it, he ran a multi-nationl
Global 5 firm with 3 EA /DA level admins who were, as he put it, all
close enough to smack each other. (+ 1 manager who had the keys in a
break glass/locked safe scenario)

 

Personally, I am a fan of 3 accounts per admin for those enterprise
level admins, 1 uberadminID (DA/EA), 1 regular adminID with appropriate
delegations like all administrators should have and the usual day-to-day
userID

 

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin
account - assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers.
Previously here they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I'm
thinking it's time to change that practice but I'll need some ammo and a
plan before I have any hope of changing this.

 

My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD
structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.

 

Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max
per domain max.

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Brown
I don't swing that large a stick here...

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Alex Eckelberry al...@sunbelt-software.com
 wrote:

  Not the answer you’re looking for, but what about a different thought?
 Don’t keep anything of value on a laptop.  Only run laptops client/server
 (VPN or TS or whatever).



 Alex





 *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:58 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* laptop encryption



 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
 bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
 piece is too costly.



 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
 report encryption status back to a management station?



 tiafah.



 Jeff











~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Brown
Plus, regardless of what I tell people to do/don't do, some are still going
to do whatever they want, either on purpose or in ignorance and I don't
think I can take that position and feel good about being in compliance...
was the missing data encrypted?  NO.  was there phi on it?  I don't
know would have to be the honest answer.  I don't think there wasn't
supposed to be works.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't swing that large a stick here...


 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Alex Eckelberry 
 al...@sunbelt-software.com wrote:

  Not the answer you’re looking for, but what about a different thought?
 Don’t keep anything of value on a laptop.  Only run laptops client/server
 (VPN or TS or whatever).



 Alex





 *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:58 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* laptop encryption



 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
 bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
 piece is too costly.



 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
 report encryption status back to a management station?



 tiafah.



 Jeff












~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Malcolm Reitz
+1 on the separate accounts. We try to keep Domain Admins to as small a
number as possible and we don't allow anyone to use their Domain Admin
account to do regular work (such as email, web browsing, etc.).

Keeping the number of DAs to a minimum also minimizes the number of people
able to screw things up for everyone (not that any of us or our coworkers
would do that) and the number of people who have full access to everyone's
data, both on workstations and servers, including sensitive stuff that IT
doesn't need to see.

-Malcolm

-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:ma...@usc.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 14:02
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

In addition, use Restricted Group GPOs as much as possible if distributed
local administration of machines is required.  Personally, I would go a step
further and separate admin level accounts of any kind from the normal,
day-to-day logins.  So, for example, at a minimum

Joe Employee
Jemployee (normal login, same user rights as everyone else on the
network)
Jemployee_admin (elevated account, either Domain Admin or what have you)


This will reduce your exposure when doing things daily, but does require
that people not circumvent it in the name of ease of use (or, what I would
call laziness.)

-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

My thoughts:

No domain admins unless there is no other way to do what you need to.

If they need to do AD administration, use LDAP OU ACLs aka delegation.

They should only get permissions delegated to them if AD management is part
of their duties.

On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, David Lum wrote:
 What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin 
 account - assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers.
 Previously here they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin,
I'm
 thinking it's time to change that practice but I'll need some ammo and
a
 plan before I have any hope of changing this.
 
 My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD 
 structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.
 
 Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts
max
 per domain max.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Ping...

2010-05-27 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
My name is Jonathan, and I am applying for a job at Google...

:-)

Happy to be of servierr distraction!


Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
www.eaglemds.comhttp://www.eaglemds.com/
jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com


From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

Why do you guys do this to me…   I have too much to do than be distracted by 
this!  :)

From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

http://www.ugoplayer.com/games/pong.html



Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comUrlBlockedError.aspx
www.eaglemds.comUrlBlockedError.aspx


From: Manuel Santos [mailto:nel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ping...

The machine that goes Ping...
2010/5/27 Dave Florea blazer...@gmail.commailto:blazer...@gmail.com
Pong
--Original Message--
From: Mathew Shember
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...
Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM

Ping...

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ping...

Pong...

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ping...

Sorry for the ping, but I don't think I'm getting messages back that
I'm sending to the list.  Either that or the message isn't making it to
the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because
y'all won't see it.

-Paul

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Sent slowly via my BBerry...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~







Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.

Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.










Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
+100

That's what I've been doing for several years. I let the servers do the heavy 
lifting and keep most of my files on tha SAN. In fact, I use a Thin Client 
running Windows CE on my desk for the majority of my computing needs. It proves 
a point that I can use the same computing resources as what I provide to my end 
users from just about anywhere in the world and still get my job done. Yes, 
there are exceptions, but not many, and most of those are specific to my job.

I reserve my laptop for more resource intensive apps (like pac-man and pong). 
Sorry couldn't resist given the threads this week and last.

Cheers!

Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
www.eaglemds.comhttp://www.eaglemds.com/
jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com


From: Alex Eckelberry [al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: laptop encryption

Not the answer you’re looking for, but what about a different thought?  Don’t 
keep anything of value on a laptop.  Only run laptops client/server (VPN or TS 
or whatever).

Alex


From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that 
discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have 
bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need something 
for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption piece is too 
costly.

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will 
report encryption status back to a management station?

tiafah.

Jeff










Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.


Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Phil Garven
+1 on separate accounts for admins

Log on with a user account (maybe a local admin) and use run as to run your 
admin programs as your domain admin or equivalent account.

If you log on as a domain admin and get a virus (happens to the best of us) 
then that virus is running as a domain admin and sending itself to your 
exchange server and remotely executing. But no one uses the internet on the 
exchange server so we don't have AV on it

Regards,

Phil Garven
Sunbelt Software

From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2-3 is max for any environment IMO. Everything else should be dome with 
delegations. They must be your most proficient admins, not any old new hire.

Check out some of joe Richard's rants about it, he ran a multi-nationl Global 5 
firm with 3 EA /DA level admins who were, as he put it, all close enough to 
smack each other. (+ 1 manager who had the keys in a break glass/locked safe 
scenario)

Personally, I am a fan of 3 accounts per admin for those enterprise level 
admins, 1 uberadminID (DA/EA), 1 regular adminID with appropriate delegations 
like all administrators should have and the usual day-to-day userID

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin account - 
assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers. Previously here 
they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I'm thinking it's time to 
change that practice but I'll need some ammo and a plan before I have any hope 
of changing this.

My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD 
structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.

Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max per 
domain max.
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764










...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Firewall recommendations

2010-05-27 Thread Jonathan Kadoo
Good afternoon everyone, just a quick question.  I have noticed a few
emails regarding firewalls for smb clients.  A number have recommended
the Fortigate products.  Just wondering about how easy or difficult
are these units to configure?  I would like to try them out with a
client of mine.

Jonathan

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Crawford, Scott
Not to nitpick, but I want to nit pick J

 

RE: But no one uses the internet on the exchange server so we don't
have AV on it

 

How is this relevant? If the AV on the workstation the DA is logged into
didn't catch the virus, why would the save AV software on the Exchange
server catch it? Or, are you suggesting that different AV be installed
on various servers?

 

From: Phil Garven [mailto:ph...@sunbeltsoftware.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

+1 on separate accounts for admins

 

Log on with a user account (maybe a local admin) and use run as to run
your admin programs as your domain admin or equivalent account.

 

If you log on as a domain admin and get a virus (happens to the best of
us) then that virus is running as a domain admin and sending itself to
your exchange server and remotely executing. But no one uses the
internet on the exchange server so we don't have AV on it

 

Regards,


Phil Garven

Sunbelt Software



From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

2-3 is max for any environment IMO. Everything else should be dome with
delegations. They must be your most proficient admins, not any old new
hire.

 

Check out some of joe Richard's rants about it, he ran a multi-nationl
Global 5 firm with 3 EA /DA level admins who were, as he put it, all
close enough to smack each other. (+ 1 manager who had the keys in a
break glass/locked safe scenario)

 

Personally, I am a fan of 3 accounts per admin for those enterprise
level admins, 1 uberadminID (DA/EA), 1 regular adminID with appropriate
delegations like all administrators should have and the usual day-to-day
userID

 

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin
account - assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers.
Previously here they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I'm
thinking it's time to change that practice but I'll need some ammo and a
plan before I have any hope of changing this.

 

My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD
structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.

 

Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max
per domain max.

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 

 

 

... 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Paul Muhlbach
What about looking at Intels' VPro technology on newer laptops.  I
believe two benefits are out of band management, hardware based
encryption, and ability to remove encryption keys from drives if lost or
stolen based on policies and checking in with a management server.
 
I heard about it last week and it seems very intriguing.
 
Regards,
Paul
 
 
 
Paul Muhlbach, A+, CNA, MCSE, MCT
APM Computer Services
Camrose, AB  
Phone 403-894-5802
email: pmuhl...@apmcomp.com
 
 


 On 5/27/2010 at 2:39 PM, Alex Eckelberry
al...@sunbelt-software.com wrote:


Not the answer you’re looking for, but what about a different thought? 
Don’t keep anything of value on a laptop.  Only run laptops
client/server (VPN or TS or whatever).
 
Alex
 
 
From:Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: laptop encryption

 
There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of
that discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I
have bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the
encryption piece is too costly.

 

anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that
will report encryption status back to a management station?

 

tiafah.

 

Jeff

  

 
 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Free, Bob
I don't ever provide DA/EA creds to anything but the most trusted
systems, I especially wouldn't use them on a box that has internet
access. That is what the other accounts are for.

 

 That is also why I am a big believer in reducing attack surface with
RBAC delegations and span of control. e.g workstation  admins aren't
server admins. 

 

From: Phil Garven [mailto:ph...@sunbeltsoftware.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

+1 on separate accounts for admins

 

Log on with a user account (maybe a local admin) and use run as to run
your admin programs as your domain admin or equivalent account.

 

If you log on as a domain admin and get a virus (happens to the best of
us) then that virus is running as a domain admin and sending itself to
your exchange server and remotely executing. But no one uses the
internet on the exchange server so we don't have AV on it

 

Regards,


Phil Garven

Sunbelt Software



From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

2-3 is max for any environment IMO. Everything else should be dome with
delegations. They must be your most proficient admins, not any old new
hire.

 

Check out some of joe Richard's rants about it, he ran a multi-nationl
Global 5 firm with 3 EA /DA level admins who were, as he put it, all
close enough to smack each other. (+ 1 manager who had the keys in a
break glass/locked safe scenario)

 

Personally, I am a fan of 3 accounts per admin for those enterprise
level admins, 1 uberadminID (DA/EA), 1 regular adminID with appropriate
delegations like all administrators should have and the usual day-to-day
userID

 

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

 

What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin
account - assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers.
Previously here they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I'm
thinking it's time to change that practice but I'll need some ammo and a
plan before I have any hope of changing this.

 

My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD
structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.

 

Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max
per domain max.

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 

 

 

... 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: laptop encryption

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Brown
I agree that is the way to do things, but disk encryption for our
environment has very little to do with me, lots to do with clinical staff in
the field.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle 
jra...@eaglemds.com wrote:

 +100

 That's what I've been doing for several years. I let the servers do the
 heavy lifting and keep most of my files on tha SAN. In fact, I use a Thin
 Client running Windows CE on my desk for the majority of my computing needs.
 It proves a point that I can use the same computing resources as what I
 provide to my end users from just about anywhere in the world and still get
 my job done. Yes, there are exceptions, but not many, and most of those are
 specific to my job.

 I reserve my laptop for more resource intensive apps (like pac-man and
 pong). Sorry couldn't resist given the threads this week and last.

 Cheers!

 Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
 Technology Coordinator
 Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
 www.eaglemds.comhttp://www.eaglemds.com/
 jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com

 
 From: Alex Eckelberry [al...@sunbelt-software.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:39 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: laptop encryption

 Not the answer you’re looking for, but what about a different thought?
  Don’t keep anything of value on a laptop.  Only run laptops client/server
 (VPN or TS or whatever).

 Alex


 From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:58 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: laptop encryption

 There was a post last week about HIPAA compliance and a small part of that
 discussion there were a couple of encryption programs mentioned.  I have
 bitlocker running on the OS's that happen to come with it, and need
 something for those that don't.  Might consider OS upgrade if the encryption
 piece is too costly.

 anyone using something they LOVE?  any chance there is a program that will
 report encryption status back to a management station?

 tiafah.

 Jeff









 
 Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
 CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
 view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
 electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
 legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
 and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended
 recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete
 this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this
 message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on
 the information that it contains.


 Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
 CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
 view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
 electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
 legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
 and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended
 recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete
 this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this
 message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on
 the information that it contains.



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Brian Desmond
The only people I give it to are the guys who actually own the AD service. That 
would be the people that support your domain controllers. Everything else gets 
delegated. Sometimes a team manage gets it depending on the organizational 
structure but it varies by organization.

There's a really good post on Joe Richards' blog actually about his 
pre-requisites to giving it to someone when he owned AD for a big corp. I'm on 
the plane right now so I can't find it. In general though I'd expect the person 
to have a solid understanding of the environment before they got the keys to 
the kingdom plus a solid understanding of the service they're going to support 
(AD) and the risks that come along with their new access.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

c - 312.731.3132


From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

What are your guy's prerequisites on someone having a Domain Admin account - 
assume a medium or large company and 4-5+ Systems Engineers. Previously here 
they've just had every new SE hire be domain admin, I'm thinking it's time to 
change that practice but I'll need some ammo and a plan before I have any hope 
of changing this.

My thinking is along the line of need to know what's going in this AD 
structure as well as being proficient in all things AD, etc.

Thoughts comments? I'm thinking there should only be 2-3 DA accounts max per 
domain max.
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: What's your requirement to allow a user DA?

2010-05-27 Thread Phil Brutsche

Phil Garven ph...@sunbeltsoftware.com previously uttered:

Log on with a user account (maybe a local admin) and use run as to  
run your admin programs as your domain admin or equivalent account.


--

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Shavlik offers 'cloud patching' with free service

2010-05-27 Thread Richard Stovall
I played with this at home several months ago after reading something Susan
Bradley wrote about it.  It just flat didn't work.  Your post prompted me to
go back and try again, and I did have some success this time.  I can
remotely scan and patch XP and Server 2008 (not R2) machines on my home LAN,
but I cannot, under any set of circumstances that I can create, remotely
scan a Windows 7 machine.  Firewall off, UAC
off, 
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\LocalAccountTokenFilterPolicy
created and set to either 0 or 1 - no combination of things I tried would
allow a successful scan of a remote Win7 computer.  (All of my Windows 7
machines are x64.  I wasn't able to try against 32 bit Win7.)  I can scan
and patch locally on Windows 7 with no problem.

It's a neat idea (if you don't mind a LOT of potentially private information
stored in the cloud), but I wouldn't think it's anywhere near a 1.0 product.
 More like early beta.

As always, YMMV.

RS

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.comwrote:

 Might be useful to small-LAN admins:

 = Included Stuff Follows =
 Shavlik offers 'cloud patching' with free service

Patch management company Shavlik is offering small networks of 10 or
 fewer
PCs access to a new online patch management service at no cost.

The new service, IT.Shavlik.com, is designed to scan for missing
 patches
on a machine-by-machine basis, or using an IP address range or domain,
reporting the results through the web portal. Missing patches across
Windows versions are rated for severity and can be downloaded using
 links
to the appropriate vendor website or using the 'FixIT' button. The
 service
also supports VMWare ESX and ESXi hypervisors.

...

Larger SMB networks can use the service in its 'Pro' form for a fee. The
company quotes a price of 'from $250' (approx £175) for networks of
between 10 and 1,000 PCs, which includes unlimited scan history storage.
This is the sharper edge what the company admits is now a 'freemium'
business model designed to lure users in with a free service before
charging them as they grasp the value of the service or their needs
 grow.


 = Included Stuff Ends =
 More here with links:

 http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/052610-shavlik-offers-cloud-patching-with.html

 --
 Angus Scott-Fleming
 GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
 1-520-290-5038
 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/





 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~