Re: Deploying Printers via GPO
It's the GPO that allows Vista and above to automatically install the drivers when they are not present. Otherwise it hangs at the GPO application. I've just changed jobs so can't dig out the exact GPO setting, sorry! On 16 September 2010 16:01, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.eduwrote: +1, works well for us here too, but we target the computer ou + the user group in combo. James—can you clarify what you mean on the Point and print restrictions? I don’t think we have that set and I’m wondering what the issue is/was. For XP machines, make sure you have the latest GPP preferences update applied for this all to work. *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:15 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Deploying Printers via GPO Use loopback policy processing on your computers OU, deploy the Group Policy Preferences printers list as a user config applied to the computers OU, set the default printer through that, and target it to the required users. Make sure you set the GPO with the point-and-print restrictions as well, so it doesn't hang when popping up the box to install the driver if there isn't a suitable one installed. On 15 September 2010 18:02, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote: Good afternoon all, Currently in a 08 domain with all XP workstations SP3 and GPO extensions installed. I need to deploy printers based on the machine and not the user. I see I can deploy printers to computers through a GPO, BUT you can’t set the default printer that way. It looks like I can deploy the printers to the user, then use ‘item-level targeting’ so it applies only when users logon to computers in certain OU’s. Is there a better way to skin this cat? Should I make a printer policy per OU, or make 1 global one with all the printers and assign them with the item-level targeting? Thanks all!! * *John C. Kelsey* DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
ESXi box failing to start
I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: Switch opinions
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Rohyans, Aaron arohy...@dpsciences.com wrote: As compared to HP’s “Clustering” which allows you to manage a stack of up to 16 switches via one IP address *individually* through the master switch (which is manually elected). HP's current stuff (going back at least to 2005) is called stacking, not clustering. You do have to manually designate the commander (master), but given that their stacking doesn't use special cables, I think that's fair (would you want every switch you put on a network automatically turning themselves into a stack?). Once you've designated a commander, you can configure it to auto-grab members. You can hot add/remove members. Each switch is its own unit with individual configuration and provisioning – including VLANs, software, etc. This is correct. Given how diverse stack members can be, I think that's unavoidable. You can't run the same software image on completely different models/generations for Cisco, can you? Connections are via ‘uplinks’ to other switches, which rely on STP to manage stack resiliency. Yes. You don't need special cables or modules or protocols; it's standard networking, with standard link aggregation and control. This means your stack is as flexible as your network; your stack can actually be quite physically separated. You can even put non-HP switches in-between your HP stack members. Mixing 10/100 w/ GigaE switches in a cluster is not possible…. At least, not that I’m aware of. It is absolutely possible. You can also mix several generations and configurations (e.g., 4000M with a 2810) in a single stack. …As compared to HP ProCurve’s Buffers/Chipsets which are based on Broadcom’s latest generation of ASIC. Citation needed. HP makes their own ASICs as far as I know; they even have a brand name, ProVision. It is widely known that these chipsets have an inherent flaw (referred to as N+1 buffer overflowing) http://www.google.com/search?q=+%22N%2B1+buffer+overflowing%22 http://www.google.com/search?q=+%22N%2B1+buffer+overflow%22 No matches for either. If it's so widely known, you would think there would be mention of it *somewhere* on the Internet. o Voice VLAN… Voice traffic can be shielded from data traffic and broadcast storms (this feature exists in ProCurve switches, but for sake of argument, I’m including it here) Just for the sake of argument, I'll point out that we're doing this on our ProCurve's right now. o Granular QoS… QoS allowing you to map/tag (and even ‘re-tag’) specific traffic to specific queues… prioritize buffers/system resources for servicing voice traffic... Check. Doing that now. Not to mention advanced queuing/congestion avoidance algorithms that take network efficiency down to the port level (alleviating upstream routers)… I can certainly configure QoS on per-port basis. Shaped Round Robin queuing (servicing traffic buffers proportionally to administratively defined weights while “buffering” traffic in order to achieve more accurate line-rate), and Weighted Random Early Detection (TCP congestion avoidance by dropping packets at pre-defined thresholds so as to alleviate TCP Synchronization). I'll admit you're over my head here. I don't know if that's possible or not. I can even go so far as to protect the Control-Plane of the switch through QoS ... Check. Configure the management VLAN with highest priority. Modular QoS… using the techniques described above, I am no longer limited to applying a “global” QoS policy to the switch (as I am with HP switches). Policies can be defined per-port or per traffic class… thus servicing different ports/traffic using different thresholds/queues/etc. The ProCurve command would be something like: interface 5 qos priority 3 ... Cisco-approved best practice QoS templates for converged network solutions .. Bingo! (As in, buzzword bingo.) SmartPorts – offer Cisco switches the ability to identify IP Phones/PCs attached to a single access port and dynamically configure themselves as a trunk port – providing for features such as the Voice VLAN and 802.1p based QoS (to the end-user… not just on switch-to-switch or switch-to-router uplinks – as is the case with HP switches). Our IP phones are plugged into our ProCurve switches. The switches use LLDP MED to configure the phones with their VLAN IDs and priorities. Voice traffic is given priority over data traffic from the PCs daisy-chained off the phones. There's no need to configure the switch port as a trunk port because ProCurve's aren't limited by Cisco's artificial trunk port concept; you can configure VLAN behavior however you want, on each individual port. o DHCP Snooping – ability of the switch to prevent rogue/unwanted DHCP servers from entering the network so as to thwart MiTM attacks, or general mischief caused by end-users. How to configure DHCP Snooping on ProCurve switches
Foundation Server and TS boxes
Is Foundation Server suitable for use on a TS (remote desktop) server ? Olly [cid:personal229.jpg] [cid:g2supportsmall_250x58border4823.png] Network Support Online Backups Server Management Tel: 0845 307 3443 Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.comhttp://www.g2support.com/ Twitter: g2supporthttp://twitter.com/home?stat...@g2support Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter Mail: 2 Roundhill Road, Brighton, Sussex, BN2 3RF Find out more about our referral gift scheme at www.g2support.com/referralhttp://www.g2support.com/referral G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmininline: personal229.jpginline: g2supportsmall_250x58border4823.png
Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
I'm testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I'm struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
Static route on the local systems for the remote ‘main’ firewall/internet via the local IP of your local Juniper, and a default gateway on local systems pointing to that remote main firewall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
Erik can you expand a little please? Site A (main site) 10.60.0.0/16 main firewall IP of 10.60.1.1 Site B (remote site) 192.168.99.0/24 - junipers LAN IP is 192.168.99.1 At Site B right now everyone's default gateway would be 192.168.99.1 but the VPN tunnels all traffic for 10.60.0.0/16 over the tunnel1.interface to the firewall at site B. Whilst I get what VPN's are/what they do I've not had much hands on and each vendor seems to do the same thing a slightly different way. Thanks, Paul From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Static route on the local systems for the remote 'main' firewall/internet via the local IP of your local Juniper, and a default gateway on local systems pointing to that remote main firewall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I'm struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
OK, at site B you set up a static route 10.60.1.1 255.255.255.255 - 192.168.99.1- so that all site B computers know how to get to the main firewall via the local firewall ( the local firewall will know to traverse the VPN and not the public internet ) Also at site B you set up a default gateway route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 - 10.60.1.1 so that all default traffic goes to the main site. Alternatively, you could put a static route in the remote Juniper to locate the public IP of the Main firewall via the remote internet/public port address ( to facilitate the tunnel ) and a default gateway in the remote Juniper to the main firewall at 10.60.1.1 This way, ONLY the traffic to create the tunnel will travel the internet connection on the remote Juniper, and ALL OTHER traffic is forced over the tunnel. This would complicate any remote configuration/access to the Juniper at 192.168.99.1 except from within the main site Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Erik can you expand a little please? Site A (main site) 10.60.0.0/16 main firewall IP of 10.60.1.1 Site B (remote site) 192.168.99.0/24 – junipers LAN IP is 192.168.99.1 At Site B right now everyone’s default gateway would be 192.168.99.1 but the VPN tunnels all traffic for 10.60.0.0/16 over the tunnel1.interface to the firewall at site B. Whilst I get what VPN’s are/what they do I’ve not had much hands on and each vendor seems to do the same thing a slightly different way. Thanks, Paul From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Static route on the local systems for the remote ‘main’ firewall/internet via the local IP of your local Juniper, and a default gateway on local systems pointing to that remote main firewall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
And yes, I know, the default gateway by original definition is supposed to live adjacent on the same subnet as the station. Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, at site B you set up a static route 10.60.1.1 255.255.255.255 - 192.168.99.1- so that all site B computers know how to get to the main firewall via the local firewall ( the local firewall will know to traverse the VPN and not the public internet ) Also at site B you set up a default gateway route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 - 10.60.1.1 so that all default traffic goes to the main site. Alternatively, you could put a static route in the remote Juniper to locate the public IP of the Main firewall via the remote internet/public port address ( to facilitate the tunnel ) and a default gateway in the remote Juniper to the main firewall at 10.60.1.1 This way, ONLY the traffic to create the tunnel will travel the internet connection on the remote Juniper, and ALL OTHER traffic is forced over the tunnel. This would complicate any remote configuration/access to the Juniper at 192.168.99.1 except from within the main site Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Erik can you expand a little please? Site A (main site) 10.60.0.0/16 main firewall IP of 10.60.1.1 Site B (remote site) 192.168.99.0/24 – junipers LAN IP is 192.168.99.1 At Site B right now everyone’s default gateway would be 192.168.99.1 but the VPN tunnels all traffic for 10.60.0.0/16 over the tunnel1.interface to the firewall at site B. Whilst I get what VPN’s are/what they do I’ve not had much hands on and each vendor seems to do the same thing a slightly different way. Thanks, Paul From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Static route on the local systems for the remote ‘main’ firewall/internet via the local IP of your local Juniper, and a default gateway on local systems pointing to that remote main firewall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: ESXi box failing to start
AFAIK ESXi wont start w/o a nic at all. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: ESXi box failing to start I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: ESXi box failing to start
I think that's correct, but this one won't start with them enabled either, and it was working fine until recently. Is there any equivalent of the ping command in the ESXi tech support console that anyone knows of? On 17 September 2010 12:58, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.comwrote: AFAIK ESXi wont start w/o a nic at all. *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 1:12 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* ESXi box failing to start I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
Erik Goldoff would like to recall this message “ RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query “ But as well all know, that capability does not exist within Outlook’s SMTP messaging, so instead, please limit the forthcoming derision and ridicule to a fun, jovial nature appropriate for a Friday J Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, at site B you set up a static route 10.60.1.1 255.255.255.255 - 192.168.99.1- so that all site B computers know how to get to the main firewall via the local firewall ( the local firewall will know to traverse the VPN and not the public internet ) Also at site B you set up a default gateway route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 - 10.60.1.1 so that all default traffic goes to the main site. Alternatively, you could put a static route in the remote Juniper to locate the public IP of the Main firewall via the remote internet/public port address ( to facilitate the tunnel ) and a default gateway in the remote Juniper to the main firewall at 10.60.1.1 This way, ONLY the traffic to create the tunnel will travel the internet connection on the remote Juniper, and ALL OTHER traffic is forced over the tunnel. This would complicate any remote configuration/access to the Juniper at 192.168.99.1 except from within the main site Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Erik can you expand a little please? Site A (main site) 10.60.0.0/16 main firewall IP of 10.60.1.1 Site B (remote site) 192.168.99.0/24 – junipers LAN IP is 192.168.99.1 At Site B right now everyone’s default gateway would be 192.168.99.1 but the VPN tunnels all traffic for 10.60.0.0/16 over the tunnel1.interface to the firewall at site B. Whilst I get what VPN’s are/what they do I’ve not had much hands on and each vendor seems to do the same thing a slightly different way. Thanks, Paul From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Static route on the local systems for the remote ‘main’ firewall/internet via the local IP of your local Juniper, and a default gateway on local systems pointing to that remote main firewall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
Re: ESXi box failing to start
Out of curiosity, why does a logical volume manager problem make you think NIC? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group ASPCA® 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 www.aspca.org The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA ®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 02:11:54 AM: I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: ESXi box failing to start
There's also the fact that the server doesn't respond to a ping in the mix too On 17 September 2010 13:06, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote: Out of curiosity, why does a logical volume manager problem make you think NIC? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group *ASPCA®* 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 *www.aspca.org* http://www.aspca.org/ The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA ®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 02:11:54 AM: I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: ESXi box failing to start
Everything in Google's search results screams NIC - but as yet, Google does not know all. Educate me, please...should I be looking somewhere else? On 17 September 2010 13:06, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote: Out of curiosity, why does a logical volume manager problem make you think NIC? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group *ASPCA®* 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 *www.aspca.org* http://www.aspca.org/ The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA ®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 02:11:54 AM: I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: Foundation Server and TS boxes
How much ram? What procs? How many users? I'd be inclined to say no, except for the smallest scenarios. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent with great difficulty from my Motorola Droid On Sep 17, 2010 4:30 AM, Oliver Marshall oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote: Is Foundation Server suitable for use on a TS (remote desktop) server ? Olly [cid:personal229.jpg] [cid:g2supportsmall_250x58border4823.png] Network Support Online Backups Server Management Tel: 0845 307 3443 Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.comhttp://www.g2support.com/ Twitter: g2supporthttp://twitter.com/home?stat...@g2support Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter Mail: 2 Roundhill Road, Brighton, Sussex, BN2 3RF Find out more about our referral gift scheme at www.g2support.com/referral http://www.g2support.com/referral G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
It's a deal! -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 17, 2010 8:03 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote: Erik Goldoff would like to recall this message “ RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query “ But as well all know, that capability does not exist within Outlook’s SMTP messaging, so instead, please limit the forthcoming derision and ridicule to a fun, jovial nature appropriate for a Friday J Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, at site B you set up a static route 10.60.1.1 255.255.255.255 - 192.168.99.1 - so that all site B computers know how to get to the main firewall via the local firewall ( the local firewall will know to traverse the VPN and not the public internet ) Also at site B you set up a default gateway route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 - 10.60.1.1 so that all default traffic goes to the main site. Alternatively, you could put a static route in the remote Juniper to locate the public IP of the Main firewall via the remote internet/public port address ( to facilitate the tunnel ) and a default gateway in the remote Juniper to the main firewall at 10.60.1.1 This way, ONLY the traffic to create the tunnel will travel the internet connection on the remote Juniper, and ALL OTHER traffic is forced over the tunnel. This would complicate any remote configuration/access to the Juniper at 192.168.99.1 except from within the main site Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Erik can you expand a little please? Site A (main site) 10.60.0.0/16 main firewall IP of 10.60.1.1 Site B (remote site) 192.168.99.0/24 – junipers LAN IP is 192.168.99.1 At Site B right now everyone’s default gateway would be 192.168.99.1 but the VPN tunnels all traffic for 10.60.0.0/16 over the tunnel1.interface to the firewall at site B. Whilst I get what VPN’s are/what they do I’ve not had much hands on and each vendor seems to do the same thing a slightly different way. Thanks, Paul From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Static route on the local systems for the remote ‘main’ firewall/internet via the local IP of your local Juniper, and a default gateway on local systems pointing to that remote main firewall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
Re: ESXi box failing to start
Perhaps the NIC had gone bad. Try replacing it? -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 17, 2010 8:00 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I think that's correct, but this one won't start with them enabled either, and it was working fine until recently. Is there any equivalent of the ping command in the ESXi tech support console that anyone knows of? On 17 September 2010 12:58, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: AFAIK ESXi wont start w/o a nic at all. *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 1:12 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* ESXi box failing to start I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: ESXi box failing to start
I could do, if there were any around. I'd forgotten how much of a pain physical servers could be, especially without shared storage in use. I'll see if I can steal a spare from one of the decommissioned ProLiants that are (apparently) hiding somewhere. On 17 September 2010 13:23, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps the NIC had gone bad. Try replacing it? -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 17, 2010 8:00 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I think that's correct, but this one won't start with them enabled either, and it was working fine until recently. Is there any equivalent of the ping command in the ESXi tech support console that anyone knows of? On 17 September 2010 12:58, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: AFAIK ESXi wont start w/o a nic at all. *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 1:12 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* ESXi box failing to start I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: ESXi box failing to start
OK as to why NIC. Anyway, just because one thing is broken doesn't mean more things are not broken... We switched from HP-UX many many years ago, and I was just getting my feet wet as to unix administration. However, it is sort-of the equivalent of the Windows disk managment system. -- richard James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 07:07:38 AM: Everything in Google's search results screams NIC - but as yet, Google does not know all. Educate me, please...should I be looking somewhere else? On 17 September 2010 13:06, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote: Out of curiosity, why does a logical volume manager problem make you think NIC? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group ASPCA® 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 www.aspca.org The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 02:11:54 AM: I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: ESXi box failing to start
I wonder if there is some HP CD I can boot from to do a diagnostics on the hardware. What's the equivalent of SmartStart these days, and is there a bootable diagnostics version? On 17 September 2010 13:36, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote: OK as to why NIC. Anyway, just because one thing is broken doesn't mean more things are not broken... We switched from HP-UX many many years ago, and I was just getting my feet wet as to unix administration. However, it is sort-of the equivalent of the Windows disk managment system. -- richard James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 07:07:38 AM: Everything in Google's search results screams NIC - but as yet, Google does not know all. Educate me, please...should I be looking somewhere else? On 17 September 2010 13:06, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote: Out of curiosity, why does a logical volume manager problem make you think NIC? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group ASPCA® 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 www.aspca.org The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 02:11:54 AM: I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: Deploying Printers via GPO
it's in User Configuration | Admin Templates | Control Panel | Printers | Point and Print Restrictions | Security Prompts On 17 September 2010 08:01, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: It's the GPO that allows Vista and above to automatically install the drivers when they are not present. Otherwise it hangs at the GPO application. I've just changed jobs so can't dig out the exact GPO setting, sorry! On 16 September 2010 16:01, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: +1, works well for us here too, but we target the computer ou + the user group in combo. James—can you clarify what you mean on the Point and print restrictions? I don’t think we have that set and I’m wondering what the issue is/was. For XP machines, make sure you have the latest GPP preferences update applied for this all to work. *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:15 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Deploying Printers via GPO Use loopback policy processing on your computers OU, deploy the Group Policy Preferences printers list as a user config applied to the computers OU, set the default printer through that, and target it to the required users. Make sure you set the GPO with the point-and-print restrictions as well, so it doesn't hang when popping up the box to install the driver if there isn't a suitable one installed. On 15 September 2010 18:02, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote: Good afternoon all, Currently in a 08 domain with all XP workstations SP3 and GPO extensions installed. I need to deploy printers based on the machine and not the user. I see I can deploy printers to computers through a GPO, BUT you can’t set the default printer that way. It looks like I can deploy the printers to the user, then use ‘item-level targeting’ so it applies only when users logon to computers in certain OU’s. Is there a better way to skin this cat? Should I make a printer policy per OU, or make 1 global one with all the printers and assign them with the item-level targeting? Thanks all!! * *John C. Kelsey* DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
It won't let me create that policy - the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I'm struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT KVM recommondation
Ok, thanks for the heads-up guys. I will look for another one. - Original Message - From: Roger Wright To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 5:01 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Ditto! Every Belkin KVM I've every used was difficult to work with. Avocents, however, have been perfect. Roger Wright ___ When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't nothin' like it! On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I was referring to the Trendnet which you had mentioned See below). I did find an OmniView that can be upgraded to IP if you want to later and it will do USB and isn't too expensive. Thanks for the input as always guys. James - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812146018 --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:29 AM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Correct, but they were inexpensive as well. We've noticed most other KVMs did not include the cables, either. --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:24:53 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation I take it it doesn't come with the cables based on the fact that it isn't mentioned as coming with any when I checked it out at CDW. - Original Message - From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:25 PM Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation No, those 16 ports connect to proprietary dongles via CAT5e/CAT6. The dongles plug into the USB/PS2 ports. It is a nice unit. If I'm serious about KVM, I would either go with Raritan or Avocent, which someone else mentioned a little bit ago. It depends on what your needs (and possibly budget) are as to which one you should go with. I honestly don't remember what the differences are now, but at the time I made the decision, Raritan was a better choice for us. One cool thing is that you can mount a local drive over the IP connection, so as long as your connection is fast enough, you potentially would never have to visit the server, even to do a bare-metal rebuild/restore. Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com -- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation You know, I've never messed around with KVM over IP. That looks like a nice unit. I assume those 16 ports connect to the ILO ports on the servers? James - Original Message - From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:54 AM Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation We've got the 16 port version of this one,
RE: ESXi box failing to start
I actually suspect that the disc logical volume mgr. I'd bet failing/corrupted drives that actually hold the ESXi system files. -sc From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 3:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: ESXi box failing to start I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Stupid BES 5.0 question
I can't seem to find this in the docs or with Google-Fu. I've been struggling with this for a day or so... How do I allow users to install/buy apps from AppWorld? OB: I hate RIM. -Jonathan ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: Switch opinions
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a “better” switch for the money, and their support is better… then why aren’t they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: “McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality”. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Stupid BES 5.0 question
OB: I hate RIM. Welcome to the club. -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Stupid BES 5.0 question I can't seem to find this in the docs or with Google-Fu. I've been struggling with this for a day or so... How do I allow users to install/buy apps from AppWorld? OB: I hate RIM. -Jonathan ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: RE: Switch opinions
It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: Switch opinions
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a “better” switch for the money, and their support is better… then why aren’t they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: “McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality”. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: OT KVM recommondation
What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System... Any medic... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sun... Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is u... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: Switch opinions
LOL *ASB* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a “better” switch for the money, and their support is better… then why aren’t they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: “McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality”. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won’t let me create that policy – the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message “peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist”?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: OT KVM recommondation
LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterp.mailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System... Any medic... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sun.http://www.sun./.. Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is u... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com.http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com./.. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it contains. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
In Juniper terms it's setup as a route based VPN exactly as per Chapter 4 of the VPN PDF for ScreenOS 6.3. The other end isn't a Juniper, but I don't think that's the issue. On the Juniper if I put a default deny rule at the bottom of the policy list, with logging, I can see that internet requests are trying to go out via the Junipers default gateway rather than through the tunnel. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won't let me create that policy - the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I'm struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
I apologize for not knowing the 6.x version documentation, I’ve been stuck on the NS-5GT devices with most of my clients and the latest there is 5.3 I think. What happens if you attempt to set up a route based vpn for the route 0.0.0.0 just like for the 10.60.1.0 route to the main office ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query In Juniper terms it’s setup as a route based VPN exactly as per Chapter 4 of the VPN PDF for ScreenOS 6.3. The other end isn’t a Juniper, but I don’t think that’s the issue. On the Juniper if I put a default deny rule at the bottom of the policy list, with logging, I can see that internet requests are trying to go out via the Junipers default gateway rather than through the tunnel. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won’t let me create that policy – the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message “peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist”?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
RE: ESXi box failing to start
Known behavior from experience and vmware community posts. From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 6:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: ESXi box failing to start Out of curiosity, why does a logical volume manager problem make you think NIC? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group ASPCA(r) 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 www.aspca.orghttp://www.aspca.org/ The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(r) (ASPCA(r)) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/17/2010 02:11:54 AM: I've got an ESXi box failing to start that stops with an error of failed to load lvmdriver. All my Google-fu points to an incompatible network card, but it was working fine until a few days ago. I've tried starting it with the NICs disabled, but it makes no difference whatsoever. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing it? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software. com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
Are you at the remote 192.168.x.x site ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m assuming it won’t work because of the metrics? From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:25 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I apologize for not knowing the 6.x version documentation, I’ve been stuck on the NS-5GT devices with most of my clients and the latest there is 5.3 I think. What happens if you attempt to set up a route based vpn for the route 0.0.0.0 just like for the 10.60.1.0 route to the main office ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query In Juniper terms it’s setup as a route based VPN exactly as per Chapter 4 of the VPN PDF for ScreenOS 6.3. The other end isn’t a Juniper, but I don’t think that’s the issue. On the Juniper if I put a default deny rule at the bottom of the policy list, with logging, I can see that internet requests are trying to go out via the Junipers default gateway rather than through the tunnel. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won’t let me create that policy – the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message “peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist”?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
RE: Assistance with eMail footers
I'll vouch for Mr. Hampshire. He was a professional musician before his band broke up and he had to take an IT job. He is like a puppy, he wants to be petted by everyone and doesn't want anyone to know he peed on the floor. He was so grateful to get this job, he promised things that no five people could deliver. From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Assistance with eMail footers I'm deeply, deeply hurt by your manufactured lies and half truths. Why would you falsely accuse me of such a terrible thing? I have many highly respected personal references, among them Martin Blackstone, Max Tork, and Amit Hanji. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote: Are you guys seriously still falling for this obvious troll? From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.commailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Assistance with eMail footers I think you will find they are trying to help you say No this is a very bad idea to the bosses. As at least one pointed out some companies will block or kill your emails as JUNK or SPAM when it comes in. Others are pointing out that putting that stuff into email will require specific codecs or player to run. Keep in mind by the end of the day like you their nerves are stretched to the breaking point due to ID10T issues caused but people much like your boss is trying to be. Putting that kind of stuff into a footer will eat up disk space on the mail server and/or client machines and I could forsee most of it getting deleted very quickly for that reason only. Jon On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Doug Hampshire dhampsh...@gmail.commailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com wrote: Why have you all hijacked my thread? I was seeking some actual help with this. We are a company focused primarily on Merger and Acquisition activities and the owner wants to include a video (I recommended Flash but he insists it work on an iPad/iPhone) of the Viking Kittens. He thinks it portrays our core values somehow. I really need to find other gainful employment. On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:10 AM, William J. Robbins dangerw...@gmail.commailto:dangerw...@gmail.com wrote: Wait until the Captain hears about this! WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck. From: Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.commailto:stevey...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:09:05 -0500 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Assistance with eMail footers I think the Enterprise was retired after the The Next Generation started On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:07 AM, William J. Robbins dangerw...@gmail.commailto:dangerw...@gmail.com wrote: Oh...my bad. I assumed he had the Enterprise kit. WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck. From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:03:57 -0400 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Assistance with eMail footers If you don't have the flux capacitor, you don't need as much. IIRC, that option isn't available to most powershell developers. On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:01 AM, William J. Robbins dangerw...@gmail.commailto:dangerw...@gmail.com wrote: Depends on the size of your shell, and how many ohms your power supply produces in gigawatts. I think you'll need 1.21. WJR - from my Crackberry. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck. From: Don Ely don@gmail.commailto:don@gmail.com Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:43:26 -0700 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Assistance with eMail footers How much power does powerscript require? On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gasper, Rick rickgas...@kings.edumailto:rickgas...@kings.edu wrote: With Enterprise you can use a powerscript to add it to the outbound smtp connector. With standard, you would need to script it to add it to the email client. Both are simple and will accomplish the same thing. From: William J. Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.commailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Assistance with eMail
PS 4.0 Anonymous User Can't Set Default Printer
Citrix issue here driving me batty. Metaframe PS 4.0. I have a published application (just an IE URL) anonymously. Then I defined a printer policy in the Metaframe console, adding 2 printers and making one the default. When the user launches the app, they get both printers, however neither one is set to the default. Is there some special permissions the anonymous user needs to set the default printer? I did have to enable guest access on the print server in order for them to be able to even add the printer. Am I missing something else? Oh, and Happy Friday! * John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Stupid BES 5.0 question
I hate iPhones, iPads, i*... From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Stupid BES 5.0 question I can't seem to find this in the docs or with Google-Fu. I've been struggling with this for a day or so... How do I allow users to install/buy apps from AppWorld? OB: I hate RIM. -Jonathan ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT KVM recommondation
Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com ] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto: mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterp.mailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto: mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System... Any medic... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: Switch opinions
ROFL! I can see it now. *ASB* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote: It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
the site is on my desk as for testing I'm using a firewall in our DMZ for the remote site, so the external NICs on each firewall are on the same switch/subnet. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:51 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Are you at the remote 192.168.x.x site ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm assuming it won't work because of the metrics? From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:25 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I apologize for not knowing the 6.x version documentation, I've been stuck on the NS-5GT devices with most of my clients and the latest there is 5.3 I think. What happens if you attempt to set up a route based vpn for the route 0.0.0.0 just like for the 10.60.1.0 route to the main office ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query In Juniper terms it's setup as a route based VPN exactly as per Chapter 4 of the VPN PDF for ScreenOS 6.3. The other end isn't a Juniper, but I don't think that's the issue. On the Juniper if I put a default deny rule at the bottom of the policy list, with logging, I can see that internet requests are trying to go out via the Junipers default gateway rather than through the tunnel. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won't let me create that policy - the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I'm struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage
RE: Deploying Printers via GPO
Interesting-I don't think I've heard of any hangs like that, but I will go check that setting as we don't have a widespread deployment yet (but it's coming soon!). Thanks! -B From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO it's in User Configuration | Admin Templates | Control Panel | Printers | Point and Print Restrictions | Security Prompts On 17 September 2010 08:01, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: It's the GPO that allows Vista and above to automatically install the drivers when they are not present. Otherwise it hangs at the GPO application. I've just changed jobs so can't dig out the exact GPO setting, sorry! On 16 September 2010 16:01, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: +1, works well for us here too, but we target the computer ou + the user group in combo. James-can you clarify what you mean on the Point and print restrictions? I don't think we have that set and I'm wondering what the issue is/was. For XP machines, make sure you have the latest GPP preferences update applied for this all to work. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO Use loopback policy processing on your computers OU, deploy the Group Policy Preferences printers list as a user config applied to the computers OU, set the default printer through that, and target it to the required users. Make sure you set the GPO with the point-and-print restrictions as well, so it doesn't hang when popping up the box to install the driver if there isn't a suitable one installed. On 15 September 2010 18:02, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.orgmailto:jckel...@drmc.org wrote: Good afternoon all, Currently in a 08 domain with all XP workstations SP3 and GPO extensions installed. I need to deploy printers based on the machine and not the user. I see I can deploy printers to computers through a GPO, BUT you can't set the default printer that way. It looks like I can deploy the printers to the user, then use 'item-level targeting' so it applies only when users logon to computers in certain OU's. Is there a better way to skin this cat? Should I make a printer policy per OU, or make 1 global one with all the printers and assign them with the item-level targeting? Thanks all!! * John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center *: 814.375.3073 * : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.orgmailto:jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
OK, just making sure you had local access to the Juniper … I’d suggest to actually try the route based VPN on 0.0.0.0 rather than assume the metric would mess it up. I’ll still be here if you try and it fails, you can say you told me so, but IMNSHO it’s at least worth a try. Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query the “site” is on my desk as for testing I’m using a firewall in our DMZ for the remote site, so the external NICs on each firewall are on the same switch/subnet. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:51 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Are you at the remote 192.168.x.x site ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m assuming it won’t work because of the metrics? From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:25 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I apologize for not knowing the 6.x version documentation, I’ve been stuck on the NS-5GT devices with most of my clients and the latest there is 5.3 I think. What happens if you attempt to set up a route based vpn for the route 0.0.0.0 just like for the 10.60.1.0 route to the main office ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query In Juniper terms it’s setup as a route based VPN exactly as per Chapter 4 of the VPN PDF for ScreenOS 6.3. The other end isn’t a Juniper, but I don’t think that’s the issue. On the Juniper if I put a default deny rule at the bottom of the policy list, with logging, I can see that internet requests are trying to go out via the Junipers default gateway rather than through the tunnel. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won’t let me create that policy – the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message “peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist”?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I’m testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I’m struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. _ MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail
RE: RE: Switch opinions
But can they pipe packets to dev null? *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** -Original Message- From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions Cisco switches are web scale... -Jeff On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: ROFL! I can see it now. ASB On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: RE: Switch opinions
Careful, that sounds like routing to me. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.orgwrote: But can they pipe packets to dev null? *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** -Original Message- From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions Cisco switches are web scale... -Jeff On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: ROFL! I can see it now. ASB On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: RE: Switch opinions
You guys have WAY too much time on your hands J From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions Careful, that sounds like routing to me. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org wrote: But can they pipe packets to dev null? *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** -Original Message- From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions Cisco switches are web scale... -Jeff On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: ROFL! I can see it now. ASB On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- http://lyris.sunbelt-/ software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query
Fair point, so I added a route for 0.0.0.0/0 to use tunnel.1 but it didn't work, the logging on the deny all rule shows the requests for 0.0.0.0 are still going out (or trying to) via the SSG directly. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 15:23 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, just making sure you had local access to the Juniper ... I'd suggest to actually try the route based VPN on 0.0.0.0 rather than assume the metric would mess it up. I'll still be here if you try and it fails, you can say you told me so, but IMNSHO it's at least worth a try. Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query the site is on my desk as for testing I'm using a firewall in our DMZ for the remote site, so the external NICs on each firewall are on the same switch/subnet. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:51 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query Are you at the remote 192.168.x.x site ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm assuming it won't work because of the metrics? From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:25 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I apologize for not knowing the 6.x version documentation, I've been stuck on the NS-5GT devices with most of my clients and the latest there is 5.3 I think. What happens if you attempt to set up a route based vpn for the route 0.0.0.0 just like for the 10.60.1.0 route to the main office ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query In Juniper terms it's setup as a route based VPN exactly as per Chapter 4 of the VPN PDF for ScreenOS 6.3. The other end isn't a Juniper, but I don't think that's the issue. On the Juniper if I put a default deny rule at the bottom of the policy list, with logging, I can see that internet requests are trying to go out via the Junipers default gateway rather than through the tunnel. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 14:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query But otherwise the VPN tunnel works to access the main site from the remote site ??? How is the original VPN rule setup ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query It won't let me create that policy - the GUI just comes up with a cryptic message peer to_siteA have vpn with tunnel interface binding, vpn invalid or not exist?! From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2010 12:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query OK, apologies, coffee just kicking in here, quite a few hours earlier than where you are. Possibly a better method using the Juniper policies. In your Trust to Untrust, or Trust to Global policies Create an ANY-ANY-ANY-TUNNEL ( Source Destination Service Action ) using the tunnel created between sites. For any device on the remote subnet that needs direct access, create a policy with ANY-ANY-ANY-Permit and place it above this any-any-any-tunnel rule Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Juniper VPN Tunnel Query I'm testing a VPN tunnel between what will be two sites. I have the tunnel working just fine between Site A and Site B using a route based VPN, however what I want to do is configure it so that in Site B any traffic for 0.0.0.0 goes over the tunnel so it goes out to the Internet via our main firewall/internet connection. I'm struggling a little on how to configure the Juniper (an SSG running ScreenOS 6.3.x) to do this as its default gateway for 0.0.0.0 is of course the router to the ISP. Thanks. MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10
Re: RE: Switch opinions
Says the guy responding to a nonesense post... :-) On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote: You guys have WAY too much time on your hands J *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:30 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RE: Switch opinions Careful, that sounds like routing to me. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org wrote: But can they pipe packets to dev null? *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** -Original Message- From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions Cisco switches are web scale... -Jeff On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: ROFL! I can see it now. ASB On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode
I bought a new W7 Pro laptop at home a while back, getting pro mainly for the XP mode. I used disk2vhd to create a vhd file from my old XP laptop (that I've wiped), copied it over, and thought I could replace the default .vhd in XP mode. But, after it just wouldn't work, some googling seemed to indicate that there is something special about the basic XP-mode freshly installed .vhd provided via the download, and that you HAVE to start clean from that, for anything you want to run or deploy-hence the licensing/activation issues. I also read something that you are only legal to run the clean-installed vhd as the free copy of XP, anything else and you have to license. So, in my case, I found that most of the apps I wanted to run didn't come thru well anyway (games, video driver in XP mode is not that great), so even though I reinstalled some stuff, I don't really use it that much. I did end up mounting the .vhd file of my old computer in my W7 OS to access as a nice way to get to my old files though-that is a very cool new feature of W7 and R2. If you do come up with a legal way to do it though, please share! -Bonnie From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode The magic I am looking for is not being asked for activation of Windows! GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Inviato: giovedì 16 settembre 2010 20.20 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode It's just a vhd. You back up the vhd and you restore the vhd. Nothing magic there... Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode And get license working without asking for activation ? Or Xp Mode in Win7 is intended only for fresh install ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: #*$% Security Tools Malware
Yes, I use DynDNS as well. There are many others, but I use them mostly because IP updates are supported in DD-WRT firmware. I pay for the service just so I don't need to re-up every month manually, its like 10 bucks a year, that's all of two drinks at the bar, no biggie. Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: #*$% Security Tools Malware Yep. I also use DynDNS, but only their free service. Really nice to be able to remote into my machine at home, on a random DSL IP address. :-) Thanks, John Aldrich IT Manager, Blueridge Carpet 706-276-2001, Ext. 2233 From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware I use DynDNS, but not for that service. Generally, I've been happy with their overall service for over 7 years now. Probably not a bad deal. ASB (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ralph Smith m...@gatewayindustries.org wrote: Along these lines, does anyone have experience with or have an opinion on a similar product from dyndns.com http://www.dyndns.com/services/dynguide/ The premium service is only $20 per year, and they seem to use Barracuda for their content and site blocking. Not a lot of detail on their web site. From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware OpenDNS also offers FamilyShield: https://www.opendns.com/familyshield Not quite a comprehensive as their standard product, but more security features. Of course, I expect ClearCloud to be better against more malware. OpenDNS does block *some* malware sites, except in the BASIC service. (I'm subscribed to the $9.95/yr plan) Anyway, I've put in a request for them to use external malware feeds and allow purchasing/obtaining the malware function across all subscription levels. ASB (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Alex Eckelberry al...@sunbelt-software.com wrote: OpenDNS is a Cadillac Escalade, ClearCloud DNS is a Porsche. Ok, that's the hyperbole. But it's apt. I like OpenDNS. I have used the service, and we are very good friends with the principals over there. But OpenDNS is a very sophisticated system that includes content filtering. ClearCloud is just focused on malware sites. OpenDNS does not block malware sites, instead requiring an additional fee: https://www.opendns.com/start/ Users of both products who have been testing it indicate that they prefer ClearCloud because: - It is very simple - just enter the IP number and go. Unlike OpenDNS, we don't care where you IP originated from (for configuration management), so we don't have to worry about updating dynamic DNS, etc. - It's quite a bit faster. OpenDNS does a lot of incredible things, but these come at a performance cost. OpenDNS is a company setup to make money on DNS. We aren't. For us, the DNS portion of ClearCloud is only one part of the equation. ClearCloud is actually the DNS infrastructure which will provide a major part of our future cloud-services model. So it pops off the work we're already doing. That's not to say we won't try and figure out a way to make some money off of it at some point (maybe by charging business a small fee for it at some point in the future), but it's not our primary focus. But simply: If you're not worried about content filtering (which has its limitations anyway in DNS, since you can only block a domain, not a full URL), then ClearCloud is better. If you want content filtering, use OpenDNS. Alex From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware OpenDNS provides similar benefits... ASB (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:27 AM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: Trying it now. Love the concept-let's see if it helps. :) From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: #*$% Security Tools Malware Btw, we update the malware URLs of these rogues right into ClearCloud. Feel free to and the ClearCloud DNS server as a replacement to your existing DNS: http://clearclouddns.com/ It's still beta, but I think you'll find it works quite well. And it's free. Alex From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: #*$%
R: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode
Found the way! I bought an XP upgrade retail and I will get MS to validate the new PK.(Otherwise I'll do a repair install on the top) At the end I didn't use XP mode and Virtual PC but Storagecraft to image and the free Virtual Box that works great in Windows 7 GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Inviato: venerdì 17 settembre 2010 16.51 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode I bought a new W7 Pro laptop at home a while back, getting pro mainly for the XP mode. I used disk2vhd to create a vhd file from my old XP laptop (that I've wiped), copied it over, and thought I could replace the default .vhd in XP mode. But, after it just wouldn't work, some googling seemed to indicate that there is something special about the basic XP-mode freshly installed .vhd provided via the download, and that you HAVE to start clean from that, for anything you want to run or deploy-hence the licensing/activation issues. I also read something that you are only legal to run the clean-installed vhd as the free copy of XP, anything else and you have to license. So, in my case, I found that most of the apps I wanted to run didn't come thru well anyway (games, video driver in XP mode is not that great), so even though I reinstalled some stuff, I don't really use it that much. I did end up mounting the .vhd file of my old computer in my W7 OS to access as a nice way to get to my old files though-that is a very cool new feature of W7 and R2. If you do come up with a legal way to do it though, please share! -Bonnie From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode The magic I am looking for is not being asked for activation of Windows! GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Inviato: giovedì 16 settembre 2010 20.20 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode It's just a vhd. You back up the vhd and you restore the vhd. Nothing magic there... Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode And get license working without asking for activation ? Or Xp Mode in Win7 is intended only for fresh install ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: RE: Switch opinions
Plug one end of your Ethernet cable in to the switch. Shove the other end in your /dev/nul orifice. -sc -Original Message- From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE: Switch opinions But can they pipe packets to dev null? *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** -Original Message- From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions Cisco switches are web scale... -Jeff On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: ROFL! I can see it now. ASB On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: It may be time to make a Cisco vs. HP animated movie... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: RE: Switch opinions On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote: How is this not relevant? If HP truly makes a better switch for the money, and their support is better... then why aren't they the market leader? This is a flawed argument. See: McDonalds hamburger sales vs. quality. McDonald's hamburgers are web scale. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: OT KVM recommondation
Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, I just need a KVM, why can't I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000? Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you're willing to live with. On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/ From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterpmailto:clusterp.mailto:clusterpmailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System... Any medic... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
Re: OT KVM recommondation
You haven't been following the Switch opinions thread? On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA* * jra...@eaglemds.com* *www.eaglemds.com -- *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com ] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto: mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterp.mailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto: mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System... Any medic... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- Any medical information contained in this electronic message
RE: OT KVM recommondation
I never saw anyswitchthread Oh, the light just came on... There, that's better... Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation You haven't been following the Switch opinions thread? On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, I just need a KVM, why can't I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000? Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you're willing to live with. On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterpmailto:clusterp.mailto:clusterpmailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16
Re: OT KVM recommondation
***On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF!* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA* * jra...@eaglemds.com* *www.eaglemds.com -- *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com ] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto: mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System Admin... Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:40 PM Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation That's not right... Newegg has the 6ft USB ones for $16 each... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ... --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: James Kerr [mailto:clusterp.mailto:clusterp... Sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT KVM recommondation Holy crap the cables are $146 each!!! - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto: mr...@ephrataschools.org To: NT System... Any medic... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an
OT: Day in the life of a sysadmin
Really long, and probably been posted here before, but it eerily reminds me of someone I know...sound familiar to anyone else? (copied from http://www.yuksrus.com/computers_sysadmin.html) The life of a sysadmin goes approximately as follows. 8am: Your pager goes off and wakes you up. The message says it's the office, and it's a crisis. You roll out of bed moaning. 8:15am: You are now sufficiently awake to phone the office. Your pager has gone off three times already. You get through to the office and the receptionist is frantic. She says nobody in the entire office can print and they have a major proposal that has to be faxed out before 9am and if it isn't the company could lose a million dollars in new business. You try to get her to explain what's wrong, but she's incoherent. 8:30am: You're dressed in yesterday's dirty clothes (they were all you could find in time) and running out the door, sipping a Jolt cola and hailing a cab to the office. 8:45am: You arrive at the office. 8:46am: You determine that the problem is that the printer is turned off, and you turn it back on. 10,000 pages spew out from the hundreds of multiple failed attempts by all of your coworkers to print. 8:47am: Your boss reams you out for not having fixed that printer problem last time when you said it was all taken care of. You spend the next hour explaining that there's nothing you can do to stop people from turning off the printer if they *really* want to. You don't bother to mention that you happen to know that the person who did it is your boss's spouse. 9:45ish: You finally convince your boss to release you and make your way to your office, assaulted all along the way by people demanding that you must help them fix things right now that you know are going to take weeks and really aren't priority. 10am: You finally arrive at your office and shut and lock the door to keep out the users. You start to read the 40 or so email messages you find waiting every morning, which include about 5 new requests, 34 or so messages demanding to know why such and such hasn't gotten done yet, and one message from your boss denying your request to have an assistant and demanding that you justify how you spend your time yet again. 10:30am: You realize that you're never going to finish getting through your email if you keep getting interrupted by these damned telephone calls from the same people who sent you the email asking the same questions, so you put your phone on do-not-disturb and go back to your email. 11am: You've just finished responding to all of your email, including the umpteen millionth justification of your existence for your boss. Unfortunately, the secretary has figured out how to order the phone system to override your do-not-disturb on your phone, and is now routing all the angry phone calls from your coworkers to you. 11:30am: You finish talking to everyone on the phone and calming them down. 11:30am-4:30pm: You work your ass off on whatever projects have the most urgency to the company. Usually this involves a lot of work with software, crawling around on the floor several times, tearing a hole in your clothing, and banging your head (hard) on the bottom of a desk. 3pm: You have your lunch delivered to your office. 4:30pm: You finally get to touch your lunch, and realize that Burger King french fries do not taste good cold. You're on about your 15th coke since arriving in the office. 4:35pm: Your lunch is over. You're not finished eating, but your boss has just phoned you (he knows how to override the DND on the phone too) and demanded that you drop everything and go fix some asinine problem which you know is caused by the user and which you fix every week and which you have warned the user about but about which they just don't listen. 6:30pm: You finish the project your boss set you to and decide to try to sneak out of the office and go home. (Not that you have a social life or anything, but you haven't had 8 hours sleep in a month and a half.) In the elevator on the way out of the office you encounter a coworker, who grabs you by the ear and drags you back to the office to fix something that's bugging them. 6:30pm-8pm: Somehow, despite repeated attempts to leave, the moment you try to actually do so, someone else appears to force you to work. 8pm: You're about to depart when you're suddenly informed that there's some vitally urgent data processing that has to be done and that only you know how to do and which can't be performed until all of the data entry people have left for the night at 10pm. 8pm-10pm: You try to nap in your office but the phone keeps ringing so you finally give up and put in several more hours of working. 10pm: You try to do your data processing but can't because there are still people logged into the data acquisition system. You spend the next fifteen minutes running around begging them to log out, and they reply that yeah, I'll be out in a minute... 10:20pm: You get sick of
OT: Friday funny
Go to google.com and search for 'Google' (w/o the ' marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Friday funny
Nothin unusual. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Friday funny Go to google.com and search for 'Google' (w/o the ' marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Friday funny
Unless that was the point. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funny Nothin unusual. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Friday funny Go to google.com and search for 'Google' (w/o the ' marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: Deploying Printers via GPO
I moved all our network printers to GPP with security groups as described above and love it! although now that we have started to deploy Windows 7 I find that it doesn't work on Windows 7. I don't have the article handy that explains why, but a word of caution to test your newly created GPP on some Windows 7 boxes before you go hog wild! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: Interesting—I don’t think I’ve heard of any hangs like that, but I will go check that setting as we don’t have a widespread deployment yet (but it’s coming soon!). Thanks! -B From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO it's in User Configuration | Admin Templates | Control Panel | Printers | Point and Print Restrictions | Security Prompts On 17 September 2010 08:01, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: It's the GPO that allows Vista and above to automatically install the drivers when they are not present. Otherwise it hangs at the GPO application. I've just changed jobs so can't dig out the exact GPO setting, sorry! On 16 September 2010 16:01, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: +1, works well for us here too, but we target the computer ou + the user group in combo. James—can you clarify what you mean on the Point and print restrictions? I don’t think we have that set and I’m wondering what the issue is/was. For XP machines, make sure you have the latest GPP preferences update applied for this all to work. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO Use loopback policy processing on your computers OU, deploy the Group Policy Preferences printers list as a user config applied to the computers OU, set the default printer through that, and target it to the required users. Make sure you set the GPO with the point-and-print restrictions as well, so it doesn't hang when popping up the box to install the driver if there isn't a suitable one installed. On 15 September 2010 18:02, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote: Good afternoon all, Currently in a 08 domain with all XP workstations SP3 and GPO extensions installed. I need to deploy printers based on the machine and not the user. I see I can deploy printers to computers through a GPO, BUT you can’t set the default printer that way. It looks like I can deploy the printers to the user, then use ‘item-level targeting’ so it applies only when users logon to computers in certain OU’s. Is there a better way to skin this cat? Should I make a printer policy per OU, or make 1 global one with all the printers and assign them with the item-level targeting? Thanks all!! * John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke
RE: Friday funny
Trying to skew the Google search statistics ??? grin Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Friday funny Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: Friday funny
“About 1,380,000,000 results (0.18 seconds)” is what I’m getting. SJ On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote: Nothin unusual. -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 11:31 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* OT: Friday funny Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- Stefan Jafs ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: *//**/On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF!/* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA_ _ jra...@eaglemds.com_ _www.eaglemds.com *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. **ASB **(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker **Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...** ** ** On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org
RE: Friday funny
You mean it didn’t say, “About ∞ results (0.01 seconds)”? Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/ From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 12:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Friday funny “About 1,380,000,000 results (0.18 seconds)” is what I’m getting. SJ On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.commailto:scaes...@caesare.com wrote: Nothin unusual. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.commailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Friday funny Go to google.comhttp://google.com/ and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- Stefan Jafs ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it contains. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT: Friday funny
I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware
On 16 Sep 2010 at 6:27, John Hornbuckle wrote: What happens is that they go to some website that pops up a browser window that´s designed to look like the window of an antivirus app. They actually do a pretty good job-it can fool the average user easily. Anyhow, the animation in the window tells them they´re infected and to click here to clean the virus, and when they click there it downloads an EXE that plants the malware on their system. Most of these popups are hard-coded to look like the standard XP theme, so one of the simplest techniques to fight these malware popups is to change your XP theme from the standard XP theme to Windows Classic. I use that theme whenever I log in with an Admin-level account, it reminds me that I'm an administrator. -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-895-3270 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: IE9 beta
On 16 Sep 2010 at 6:14, John Hornbuckle wrote: Can this run alongside with the 32-bit version (that is, run 64-bit Square in 64-bit IE and the regular 32-bit 10.1 in 32-bit IE)? If it can't, you could set it up as the primary Internet Explorer and then have your working IE in a VPC image for your real work. MS even makes preconfigured VPCs of different flavours of Internet Explorer available for download here: Download details: Internet Explorer Application Compatibility VPC Image VPC Hard Disk Images for testing websites with different Internet Explorer versions on Windows XP and Windows Vista http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EFdisplaylang=en or here if the above wraps unusably: http://preview.tinyurl.com/2atkeqh -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware
On 16 Sep 2010 at 11:18, Alex Eckelberry wrote: I have asked and they said they would put that up. Kewl ... -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware On 15 Sep 2010 at 14:45, Alex Eckelberry wrote: In my discussions with Malwarebytes, they have indicated that they are ok with the use of Malwarebytes in a commercial environment for a one-time use to clean an infected system -- at least as it regards the website vipre.malwarebytes.org. Having that made explicit on the vipre.malwarebytes.org page would be a Good Thing. -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: iTunes
On 16 Sep 2010 at 21:01, Jon Harris wrote: ^(*^()()* iTunes was required to get music loaded on my daughters iPod. Not true, I believe you can use SharePod to load iPods. (No personal experience, I don't own one.) SharePod Add and remove music, videos, playlists and artwork on your iPod. http://www.getsharepod.com/ -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode
On 17 Sep 2010 at 7:50, Miller Bonnie L. wrote: I bought a new W7 Pro laptop at home a while back, getting pro mainly for the XP mode. I used disk2vhd to create a vhd file from my old XP laptop (that I´ve wiped), copied it over, and thought I could replace the default .vhd in XP mode. But, after it just wouldn´t work, some googling seemed to indicate that there is something special about the basic XP-mode freshly installed .vhd provided via the download, and that you HAVE to start clean from that, for anything you want to run or deploy-hence the licensing/activation issues. I also read something that you are only legal to run the clean-installed vhd as the free copy of XP, anything else and you have to license. I wonder what the license issues are WRT to running that VHD in a different VM environment like VirtualBox. You own the original license for XP, but if it was an OEM license I suppose the license doesn't transfer with the VHD. IMHO this is probably a case where MS wouldn't care to open the can of worms of licensing -- their special virtual XP vs your old XP license, you *have* a license to run XP under W7. I'll bet a jury would decide to throw MS out of court on that one ;-) -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
*Latent* racism? You don't know the half of it...yet. - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:06, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.com wrote: Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: *//**/On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF!/* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA_ _ jra...@eaglemds.com_ _www.eaglemds.com *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. **ASB **(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker **Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...** ** ** On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT KVM recommonda... My reply about the KVM cables where regarding the cables for the Raritan, you must have thought I wa... - Original Message - From: Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org
Re: #*$% Security Tools Malware
OpenDNS is a win-win imho. Can anyone tell me otherwise? Like Jonathan, I've been using it religiously since the poisoning issues. In my DNS performance testing its always the fastest as well. If you never have, test yours as well: http://code.google.com/p/namebench/ -- ME2 On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: OpenDNS provides similar benefits... *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:27 AM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: Trying it now. Love the concept—let’s see if it helps. :) *From:* Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:58 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: #*$% Security Tools Malware Btw, we update the malware URLs of these rogues right into ClearCloud. Feel free to and the ClearCloud DNS server as a replacement to your existing DNS: http://clearclouddns.com/ It’s still beta, but I think you’ll find it works quite well. And it’s free. Alex *From:* Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:55 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: #*$% Security Tools Malware http://vipre.malwarebytes.org/ Free. And the combination really works. *From:* John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:20 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* #*$% Security Tools Malware The “Security Tools” malware is about to drive me insane. My users keep managing to infect themselves with it, and we’re having trouble stopping it. They don’t run with admin rights, so there’s no real damage done to their systems and we can clean it up in about two minutes. But the time adds up, and I’m tired of my technicians having to waste time on it. Our antimalware software is Microsoft’s Forefront Client Security, and it’s having a tough time catching this. Every time I get infected, I send the EXE to Microsoft and they update their definitions—but the EXE’s used by the malware apparently change rapidly, and seem to constantly be a step ahead of FCS’s definitions. I can think of a couple of options that I know would stop it, like blocking all EXE’s at our web filter or using group policy to limit the running of EXE’s—but this would also prevent users from doing things like installing safe plug-ins from websites, so it’s not a first resort. Suggestions? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District www.taylor.k12.fl.us ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: IE9 beta
Dang. Nice find! Thanks :) -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: IE9 beta On 16 Sep 2010 at 6:14, John Hornbuckle wrote: Can this run alongside with the 32-bit version (that is, run 64-bit Square in 64-bit IE and the regular 32-bit 10.1 in 32-bit IE)? If it can't, you could set it up as the primary Internet Explorer and then have your working IE in a VPC image for your real work. MS even makes preconfigured VPCs of different flavours of Internet Explorer available for download here: Download details: Internet Explorer Application Compatibility VPC Image VPC Hard Disk Images for testing websites with different Internet Explorer versions on Windows XP and Windows Vista http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958 F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EFdisplaylang=en or here if the above wraps unusably: http://preview.tinyurl.com/2atkeqh -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
Latent racism? If you're using HP switches, the racism would arrive without delay complete with a multimedia footer appended to it. - Sean On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:21 AM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote: *Latent* racism? You don't know the half of it...yet. - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:06, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote: Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: *//**/On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF!/* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA_ _ jra...@eaglemds.com_ _www.eaglemds.com *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. **ASB **(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker **Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...** ** ** On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com mailto:cluster...@gmail.commailto:cluster...@gmail.com mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
ROFLMAO! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote: Latent racism? If you're using HP switches, the racism would arrive without delay complete with a multimedia footer appended to it. - Sean On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:21 AM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote: *Latent* racism? You don't know the half of it...yet. - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:06, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote: Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: *//**/On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF!/* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA_ _ jra...@eaglemds.com_ _www.eaglemds.com *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. **ASB **(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker **Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...** ** ** On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com
RE: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
I have to confess I missed the latent racism part. Either I'm not sensitive enough, too good-natured, or too naïve. As far as debate team tryouts, I'd vote for ASB as president of the team any day. -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: *//**/On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF!/* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, I just need a KVM, why can't I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000? Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you're willing to live with. On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA_ _ jra...@eaglemds.com_ _www.eaglemds.com *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. **ASB **(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker **Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...** ** ** On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e... -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
LOL Well played, sir. Well played indeed. *ASB* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote: Latent racism? If you're using HP switches, the racism would arrive without delay complete with a multimedia footer appended to it. - Sean On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:21 AM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote: *Latent* racism? You don't know the half of it...yet. - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:06, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote: Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? -ASB ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
Thank you, thank you! I promise an argument in every home, and incessant bickering in the streets. *ASB* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.comwrote: I have to confess I missed the latent racism part. Either I'm not sensitive enough, too good-natured, or too naïve. As far as debate team tryouts, I'd vote for ASB as president of the team any day. -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF! You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? -ASB ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
I thought this was an Argument!? No, this is Abuse! --Monty Python, Argument skit --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:33:48 -0700 Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation Thank you, thank you! I promise an argument in every home, and incessant bickering in the streets. *ASB* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.comwrote: I have to confess I missed the latent racism part. Either I'm not sensitive enough, too good-natured, or too naïve. As far as debate team tryouts, I'd vote for ASB as president of the team any day. -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF! You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? -ASB ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
clearcloud
so in testing the clearcloud DNS, we seem to have issues with our RBL not working. our RBL works fine with our ISPs DNS or even google's, or OpenDNS... but when I tried the clearcloud, no joy thoughts? has anyone else seen this? Google.com Learn it. Live it. Love it. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Deploying Printers via GPO
If you come up with the article, please post. This could be a huge problem for us implementing W7 for student labs. Don't think we've tried it yet. -Original Message- From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:swimbe...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO I moved all our network printers to GPP with security groups as described above and love it! although now that we have started to deploy Windows 7 I find that it doesn't work on Windows 7. I don't have the article handy that explains why, but a word of caution to test your newly created GPP on some Windows 7 boxes before you go hog wild! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: Interesting-I don't think I've heard of any hangs like that, but I will go check that setting as we don't have a widespread deployment yet (but it's coming soon!). Thanks! -B From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO it's in User Configuration | Admin Templates | Control Panel | Printers | Point and Print Restrictions | Security Prompts On 17 September 2010 08:01, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: It's the GPO that allows Vista and above to automatically install the drivers when they are not present. Otherwise it hangs at the GPO application. I've just changed jobs so can't dig out the exact GPO setting, sorry! On 16 September 2010 16:01, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: +1, works well for us here too, but we target the computer ou + the user group in combo. James-can you clarify what you mean on the Point and print restrictions? I don't think we have that set and I'm wondering what the issue is/was. For XP machines, make sure you have the latest GPP preferences update applied for this all to work. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO Use loopback policy processing on your computers OU, deploy the Group Policy Preferences printers list as a user config applied to the computers OU, set the default printer through that, and target it to the required users. Make sure you set the GPO with the point-and-print restrictions as well, so it doesn't hang when popping up the box to install the driver if there isn't a suitable one installed. On 15 September 2010 18:02, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote: Good afternoon all, Currently in a 08 domain with all XP workstations SP3 and GPO extensions installed. I need to deploy printers based on the machine and not the user. I see I can deploy printers to computers through a GPO, BUT you can't set the default printer that way. It looks like I can deploy the printers to the user, then use 'item-level targeting' so it applies only when users logon to computers in certain OU's. Is there a better way to skin this cat? Should I make a printer policy per OU, or make 1 global one with all the printers and assign them with the item-level targeting? Thanks all!! * John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here:
RE: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode
I'll have to dig around and see if I can find what I had read--I think it might be in the EULA for XP mode or something. But if you own an XP copy with a license that is valid, I agree that you should be able to run it where you want. -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode On 17 Sep 2010 at 7:50, Miller Bonnie L. wrote: I bought a new W7 Pro laptop at home a while back, getting pro mainly for the XP mode. I used disk2vhd to create a vhd file from my old XP laptop (that I´ve wiped), copied it over, and thought I could replace the default .vhd in XP mode. But, after it just wouldn´t work, some googling seemed to indicate that there is something special about the basic XP-mode freshly installed .vhd provided via the download, and that you HAVE to start clean from that, for anything you want to run or deploy-hence the licensing/activation issues. I also read something that you are only legal to run the clean-installed vhd as the free copy of XP, anything else and you have to license. I wonder what the license issues are WRT to running that VHD in a different VM environment like VirtualBox. You own the original license for XP, but if it was an OEM license I suppose the license doesn't transfer with the VHD. IMHO this is probably a case where MS wouldn't care to open the can of worms of licensing -- their special virtual XP vs your old XP license, you *have* a license to run XP under W7. I'll bet a jury would decide to throw MS out of court on that one ;-) -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode
Google Windows VDA. MS's position on running a virtualized Windows instance is you either need SA, or a VDA subscription. -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:41:04 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode I'll have to dig around and see if I can find what I had read--I think it might be in the EULA for XP mode or something. But if you own an XP copy with a license that is valid, I agree that you should be able to run it where you want. -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: How to restore XP Image in XP Mode On 17 Sep 2010 at 7:50, Miller Bonnie L. wrote: I bought a new W7 Pro laptop at home a while back, getting pro mainly for the XP mode. I used disk2vhd to create a vhd file from my old XP laptop (that I´ve wiped), copied it over, and thought I could replace the default .vhd in XP mode. But, after it just wouldn´t work, some googling seemed to indicate that there is something special about the basic XP-mode freshly installed .vhd provided via the download, and that you HAVE to start clean from that, for anything you want to run or deploy-hence the licensing/activation issues. I also read something that you are only legal to run the clean-installed vhd as the free copy of XP, anything else and you have to license. I wonder what the license issues are WRT to running that VHD in a different VM environment like VirtualBox. You own the original license for XP, but if it was an OEM license I suppose the license doesn't transfer with the VHD. IMHO this is probably a case where MS wouldn't care to open the can of worms of licensing -- their special virtual XP vs your old XP license, you *have* a license to run XP under W7. I'll bet a jury would decide to throw MS out of court on that one ;-) -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
Help! Help! I'm being repressed! - (says the HP switch from within a largely Cisco network) But I'm not dead yet! - 3Com Don't worry, you will be! - HP to 3Com she turned me into a newt! (Cisco says excitedly about HP) You look alright to me... (HP Procurve net admin) I got better... (Cisco sheepishly...) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@eaglemds.com www.eaglemds.com -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 12:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation I thought this was an Argument!? No, this is Abuse! --Monty Python, Argument skit --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:33:48 -0700 Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation Thank you, thank you! I promise an argument in every home, and incessant bickering in the streets. *ASB* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.comwrote: I have to confess I missed the latent racism part. Either I'm not sensitive enough, too good-natured, or too naïve. As far as debate team tryouts, I'd vote for ASB as president of the team any day. -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: On another note, where's our Friday Funny? TGIF! You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? -ASB ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it contains. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: clearcloud
Can you create a static DNS entry pointing to your RBL? Roger Wright ___ When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't nothin' like it! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:37 PM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote: so in testing the clearcloud DNS, we seem to have issues with our RBL not working. our RBL works fine with our ISPs DNS or even google's, or OpenDNS... but when I tried the clearcloud, no joy thoughts? has anyone else seen this? Google.com Learn it. Live it. Love it. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Deploying Printers via GPO
And to possibly answer my own post, I did a quick google and am mostly seeing stuff about driver compatibility being the problem. For example, adding Win7 boxen when your print server is still WS03, then it can't load drivers so the GPP appears to not work. We just painfully completed our print server migration to 2008 R2 last spring, and have both XP and 7 machines loading drivers from there, both x86 and x64. I only have one application that is still having a major issue, which is Filemaker Pro combined with latest the HP universal drivers. -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Deploying Printers via GPO If you come up with the article, please post. This could be a huge problem for us implementing W7 for student labs. Don't think we've tried it yet. -Original Message- From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:swimbe...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO I moved all our network printers to GPP with security groups as described above and love it! although now that we have started to deploy Windows 7 I find that it doesn't work on Windows 7. I don't have the article handy that explains why, but a word of caution to test your newly created GPP on some Windows 7 boxes before you go hog wild! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: Interesting-I don't think I've heard of any hangs like that, but I will go check that setting as we don't have a widespread deployment yet (but it's coming soon!). Thanks! -B From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO it's in User Configuration | Admin Templates | Control Panel | Printers | Point and Print Restrictions | Security Prompts On 17 September 2010 08:01, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: It's the GPO that allows Vista and above to automatically install the drivers when they are not present. Otherwise it hangs at the GPO application. I've just changed jobs so can't dig out the exact GPO setting, sorry! On 16 September 2010 16:01, Miller Bonnie L. mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote: +1, works well for us here too, but we target the computer ou + the user group in combo. James-can you clarify what you mean on the Point and print restrictions? I don't think we have that set and I'm wondering what the issue is/was. For XP machines, make sure you have the latest GPP preferences update applied for this all to work. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deploying Printers via GPO Use loopback policy processing on your computers OU, deploy the Group Policy Preferences printers list as a user config applied to the computers OU, set the default printer through that, and target it to the required users. Make sure you set the GPO with the point-and-print restrictions as well, so it doesn't hang when popping up the box to install the driver if there isn't a suitable one installed. On 15 September 2010 18:02, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote: Good afternoon all, Currently in a 08 domain with all XP workstations SP3 and GPO extensions installed. I need to deploy printers based on the machine and not the user. I see I can deploy printers to computers through a GPO, BUT you can't set the default printer that way. It looks like I can deploy the printers to the user, then use 'item-level targeting' so it applies only when users logon to computers in certain OU's. Is there a better way to skin this cat? Should I make a printer policy per OU, or make 1 global one with all the printers and assign them with the item-level targeting? Thanks all!! * John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two
RE: OT: Friday funny
Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.commailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.comhttp://google.com and search for 'Google' (w/o the ' marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT: Friday funny
*raises hand* - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:55, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT: Friday funny
well I use Bing, because it is the best way google the things you are looking for. /50's housewife voice Google.com Learn it. Live it. Love it. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:55, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: OT: Friday funny
I didn’t see anything funny Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 12:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Friday funny Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT: Friday funny
- Horschack - Ooo Ooo pick me pick me! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT: Friday funny
Vinnie Barbarino What? Where? /Vinnie Barbarino - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:59, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote: - Horschack - Ooo Ooo pick me pick me! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.comwrote: Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: clearcloud
i'll look at that... in the mean time w2k8 DNS server, I have it in there server, DNS, Forwarders, I have the clearcloud DNS in there, but it won't resolve the dns server FQDN. the others I use, OpenDNS and our ISPs resolve fine... odd that Google.com Learn it. Live it. Love it. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:54, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote: Can you create a static DNS entry pointing to your RBL? Roger Wright ___ When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't nothin' like it! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:37 PM, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote: so in testing the clearcloud DNS, we seem to have issues with our RBL not working. our RBL works fine with our ISPs DNS or even google's, or OpenDNS... but when I tried the clearcloud, no joy thoughts? has anyone else seen this? Google.com Learn it. Live it. Love it. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: OT the OT OT KVM recommondation
Well done, I was *that* close to having to clean coffee off my monitor :) -Jeff Steward On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote: Latent racism? If you're using HP switches, the racism would arrive without delay complete with a multimedia footer appended to it. - Sean On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:21 AM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote: *Latent* racism? You don't know the half of it...yet. - WJR On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:06, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote: Yeah, keeping up with the list this week has been entertaining. animation, email footers, latent racism, debate team tryouts. good times. Bill Andrew S. Baker wrote: *//**/On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF!/* You actually need a Friday one? We've been running an all week special this week. Didn't you notice? *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: Agreed that it is not not fair to compare Belkin to Avovent/Raritan. You hit the nail on the head by detailing what I was trying to convey in my very brief post. Someone saying, “I just need a KVM, why can’t I buy [insert dirt cheap option here]? Why do I need to spend $x,000?” Well for some applications, it might be fine, but it all depends on the application of said device and how much frustration you’re willing to live with. On another note, where’s our Friday Funny? TGIF! Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA_ _ jra...@eaglemds.com_ _www.eaglemds.com *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT KVM recommondation Across classes of equipment, you will typically get what you pay for. Across classes, as opposed to within the class. That is to say, MOST servers that cost $1000-3000 are different enough from the ones costing $6000-$15000 that the sentiment is correct. However, *within* the same class of system or machine or device -- within the tier 1 level, or within the tier 2 level -- it is possible for cost alone to be insufficient as a determinant of quality or value. I'd never compare a Belkin with an Avocent, except maybe at the very lowest end of the Avocent line.TrendNet, Belkin, and a few others play in that consumer/SOHO space, and within that space price is not always the differentiator. While Avocent and Raritan are much more price comparable today, years ago, Cybex/Avocent was better priced that Raritan AND of better quality. But they were in the same enterprise level class... :) And I still greatly prefer Avocent. **ASB **(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker **Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...** ** ** On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: LOL, +1 Unlike the Cisco/HP discussion, I believe most of us (who manage more than 3 or 4 servers via one device frequently) will likely concur that in the area of KVM, you will usually, generally get what you pay forI am open to evidence supporting the contrary. :-) Jonathan L. Raper, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Incredible (and yes, it really is) Droid. Please excuse brevity any misspellings. - Reply message - From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 9:08 am Subject: RE: OT KVM recommondation To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com What, they only lockup the server once a month now? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com mailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yep. Although, Belkin has gotten a little better in recent years. A little. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Sep 16, 2010 4:56 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.commailto:jra...@eaglemds.com mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com wrote: I've had _BAD_ experience with Belkin's being _REALLY_ flaky. (Isn't that who makes OmniView?) Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians Associates, PA jra...@e...
Re: OT: Friday funny
Yesterday there was DNS poisoning in some areas. LifeHacker had an article on it. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote: - Horschack - Ooo Ooo pick me pick me! On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.comwrote: Really? How many of you did this and did NOT see anything funny? Shook *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2010 12:17 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: OT: Friday funny I dont see anything funny! :-( -- ME2 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: Go to google.com and search for ‘Google’ (w/o the ‘ marks) Shook ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
