Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Katonda)
April fool or not..there is a serious side here.Is the uncertainty hitting user adoption rates or churn? Would it be a good idea to simply look at a mid term programe this year to rewrite or replace many of the non opensource packages to close the gap and silence critics? Maybe this is just good house keeping ..pity it takes away resources from other development innovations? Clearly I read into this a confusion on the publics part between Solaris and Opensolaris brands which comes down to marketing weakness? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [basic] cmds to discover/report hardware
On 04/01/10 14:17, Harry Putnam wrote: Marion Hakansonhakan...@ohsu.edu writes: shawn.wal...@oracle.com said: Have you checked the output of prtdiag and prtconf -v ? Also smbios, and scanpci (in /usr/bin/X11/ on Solaris-10). Nice... I think most or maybe all that same info is available buy running the program `Device Driver Utility'. However see below for what happens here. Does anyone know the keyboard command to run the: Device Driver Utility Either in the Application/System menu or in some install media there is an icon left for `Device Driver Utility' left on the desktop. When I try to run it from Applications/System menu I get an icon in the taskbar saying `Device Driver Utility' is starting, but then it never appears, and after 30 seconds or so the icon in taskbar disappears but still never see the interface. So how can I start it from the cmdline? ddu as root... - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] about snapshot schedule
On 4/1/2010 5:35 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: I'm seeing something in the */.zfs/snapshot directories I hadn't noticed before. For example in /.zfs/snapshot There are only files with names like: zfs-auto-snap:frequent[...] zfs-auto-snap:weekly[...] zfs-auto-snap:monthly[...] No hourly or daily snapshots check svcs -a | grep snap to see if any of the snapshot services has failed and is in maintenance mode. Sometimes a simple svcadm clear service-name brings them back online. Depending on how you installed autosnapshot, you might check root's crontab. Also, do this: zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:hourly rpool zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:daily rpool zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:frequent rpool ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Katonda)
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Peter Jones bloosk...@netscape.net wrote: April fool or not..there is a serious side here.Is the uncertainty hitting user adoption rates or churn? Would it be a good idea to simply look at a mid term programe this year to rewrite or replace many of the non opensource packages to close the gap and silence critics? Maybe this is just good house keeping ..pity it takes away resources from other development innovations? Clearly I read into this a confusion on the publics part between Solaris and Opensolaris brands which comes down to marketing weakness? There already is such a project. http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+emancipation/Helping In addition, the ksh93 integration project has delivered (and has a lot more in the queue) a lot to help this goal. http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+ksh93-integration/ There are other efforts that have been ongoing for some time (e.g. ON build with gcc) that are also related. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Any one knows which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out?
Hello Does anyone know which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out? I'm not able to find the file in sxce 127. Any ideas are welcome Henry ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any one knows which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out?
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 14:27 +0200, Henry Pepper wrote: Hello Does anyone know which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out? 'pkg search' will help you. The package name is system/zones/internal, which was called SUNWzoneint before b132. I'm not able to find the file in sxce 127. Any ideas are welcome Henry ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any one knows which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out?
Hello Does anyone know which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out? I'm not able to find the file in sxce 127. Any ideas are welcome Part of the source, not distributed. Why do you need it? Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [basic] cmds to discover/report hardware
Bart Smaalders bart.smaald...@sun.com writes: [...] shawn.wal...@oracle.com said: Have you checked the output of prtdiag and prtconf -v ? Also smbios, and scanpci (in /usr/bin/X11/ on Solaris-10). Nice... I think most or maybe all that same info is available buy running the program `Device Driver Utility'. However see below for what happens here. Does anyone know the keyboard command to run the: Device Driver Utility [...] So how can I start it from the cmdline? ddu as root... Well since the X session is not owned by root I get an error about not being able to open the display but its followed by what looks like a python error: # ddu Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server Xlib: No protocol specified /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57: GtkWarning: could not open display warnings.warn(str(e), _gtk.Warning) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/ddu, line 53, in module import pynotify ImportError: No module named pynotify And trying with pfex from the user whos X session it is: pfexec ddu Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/ddu, line 53, in module import pynotify ImportError: No module named pynotify This is with build 133 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] about snapshot schedule
Oscar del Rio del...@mie.utoronto.ca writes: On 4/1/2010 5:35 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: I'm seeing something in the */.zfs/snapshot directories I hadn't noticed before. For example in /.zfs/snapshot There are only files with names like: zfs-auto-snap:frequent[...] zfs-auto-snap:weekly[...] zfs-auto-snap:monthly[...] No hourly or daily snapshots check svcs -a | grep snap to see if any of the snapshot services has failed and is in maintenance mode. Sometimes a simple svcadm clear service-name brings them back online. They're all online: online Mar_12 svc:/system/filesystem/zfssnap-roleadd:default online Mar_12 svc:/system/filesystem/zfs/auto-snapshot:monthly online Mar_12 svc:/system/filesystem/zfs/auto-snapshot:frequent online Mar_12 svc:/system/filesystem/zfs/auto-snapshot:weekly online Mar_12 svc:/system/filesystem/zfs/auto-snapshot:daily online Mar_12 svc:/system/filesystem/zfs/auto-snapshot:hourly Edward Ned Harvey solar...@nedharvey.com writes: [...] Depending on how you installed autosnapshot, you might check root's crontab. It was installed however a default install does it. My last update was from b128 to b133... I didn't do anything special regarding auto snapshot setup. Also, do this: zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:hourly rpool zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:daily rpool zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:frequent rpool Those show much of nothing: example: root # zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot:hourly rpool NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE rpool com.sun:auto-snapshot:hourly - - However, I see the same output from zpools z2 and z3 but those pools have recent hourly and daily snapshots on disk. Far as I new, this is all that needed setting to have the defaults in play: zfs get com.sun:auto-snapshot rpool NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE rpool com.sun:auto-snapshot true local And that is set the same for all zpools, still rpool is getting different treatment than my 2 other zpools. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any one knows which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out?
Halton helped me with identifying the package as SUNWzoneint. I'm trying to build the 'gate' system, following - http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/constructor_notes - http://blogs.sun.com/sunwg11nprg/entry/how_to_create_opensolaris_distribution1 I'm trying to find a way to build OSOL distro so I can build an Amazon AMI. Henry On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:01 PM, casper@sun.com wrote: Hello Does anyone know which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out? I'm not able to find the file in sxce 127. Any ideas are welcome Part of the source, not distributed. Why do you need it? Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any one knows which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out?
On 04/ 2/10 09:13 AM, Henry Pepper wrote: Halton helped me with identifying the package as SUNWzoneint. I'm trying to build the 'gate' system, following - http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/constructor_notes - http://blogs.sun.com/sunwg11nprg/entry/how_to_create_opensolaris_distribution1 I'm trying to find a way to build OSOL distro so I can build an Amazon AMI. You can get it here: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/current/ sarah * Henry On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:01 PM,casper@sun.com wrote: Hello Does anyone know which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out? I'm not able to find the file in sxce 127. Any ideas are welcome Part of the source, not distributed. Why do you need it? Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
OK, since 2010.03 is MIA, any communication for b135 still being cloaked? I believe it was due a week ago or so and no word on its status. One could assume that all-hands are on deck to deal with 2010.03/04 issues but could we at least get an acknoledgement that 135 will be skipped/delayed and that the next dev release to be make available will be 136? 137? Lack of communication from the project on dev release cycles at this time doesn't help the already jittery, from Oracle(tm) (Open)Solaris cricket noises, community... -Rob -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Rob Healey rhea...@norstar.com wrote: OK, since 2010.03 is MIA, any communication for b135 still being cloaked? I believe it was due a week ago or so and no word on its status. One could assume that all-hands are on deck to deal with 2010.03/04 issues but could we at least get an acknoledgement that 135 will be skipped/delayed and that the next dev release to be make available will be 136? 137? Lack of communication from the project on dev release cycles at this time doesn't help the already jittery, from Oracle(tm) (Open)Solaris cricket noises, community... -Rob -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org My support contract got extended to include the named 2010.03 release, which hasn't even been released yet. We pretty much wasted our money on this one, neither our sales rep, or any contact at Sun can even say for certainty at this point the release will even happen. We just get Oracle is committed to your business, please hold tight while we look into your issue. It's not a technical issue, but a contractual one. Our support contract was written to include that release, but so far not even new dev builds are available. We've been holding tight with disabled X4540's (de-dupe issue, can't even delete large files without the system hanging for 3 days until the delete finishes). We're about ready to wipe the machines, and switch to RHEL or FreeBSD. At least those operating systems support -DELETING FILES-! Sorry to rant, but this is the only place where Oracle customers can even be heard lately. No one inside Oracle knows whats going on, or how to even support their products/servers. -- Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
On 04/ 3/10 08:48 AM, Brent Jones wrote: We've been holding tight with disabled X4540's (de-dupe issue, can't even delete large files without the system hanging for 3 days until the delete finishes). We're about ready to wipe the machines, and switch to RHEL or FreeBSD. At least those operating systems support -DELETING FILES-! I didn't realise they had dedup... Wouldn't turning it off be easier than changing OS? -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote: On 04/ 3/10 08:48 AM, Brent Jones wrote: We've been holding tight with disabled X4540's (de-dupe issue, can't even delete large files without the system hanging for 3 days until the delete finishes). We're about ready to wipe the machines, and switch to RHEL or FreeBSD. At least those operating systems support -DELETING FILES-! I didn't realise they had dedup... Wouldn't turning it off be easier than changing OS? -- Ian. We were promised de-dupe would be available a couple months after we first purchased the units in December of 2008. In reality, it took almost a year to get the feature, and it doesn't even work. We can turn de-dupe off, but it doesn't fix that we have hundreds of TB of de-duped data already written, that we can't delete or destroy the datasets without bricking the systems for days/weeks while the delete is happening. See CR 6924824 if you want the details. I'm more angry that we keep getting the carrot on a stick treatment, while we could have already switched to another vendor with stable CIFS and iSCSI services, with working de-dupe. -- Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Where can I find info on the gate project? or how to fix: File setup.py, line 1, in module from setuptools import setup, find_packages
Hi I'm failing to build the 'gate' application following the instructions in: - http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/constructor_notes - http://blogs.sun.com/sunwg11nprg/entry/how_to_create_opensolaris_distribution1 a) Does anyone know where I can find information on the 'gate' project? b) Does anyone have an idea on how to troubleshoot this? I've never worked with python, only perl. c) Anyone has an idea of what the problem might be here? Thanks Henry pfexec python2.6 setup.py install --root=/home/cadm/pkg-gate/proto/root_i386 --install-lib=usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages --install-data=usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages running install running build running build_py Not trusting file /home/cadm/pkg-gate/.hg/hgrc from untrusted user cadm, group staff Not trusting file /home/cadm/pkg-gate/.hg/hgrc from untrusted user cadm, group staff running build_ext running install_lib running install_data running install_egg_info Removing /home/cadm/pkg-gate/proto/root_i386/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg-0.1-py2.6.egg-info Writing /home/cadm/pkg-gate/proto/root_i386/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg-0.1-py2.6.egg-info installing Mako Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 1, in module from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools install failed and returned 1. Command was: python2.6 setup.py install --root=/home/cadm/pkg-gate/proto/root_i386 --install-lib=usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages --install-data=usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages Build on: OpenSolaris Development snv_133 X86 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Where can I find info on the gate project? or how to fix: File setup.py, line 1, in module from setuptools import setup, find_packages
Henry Pepper wrote: Hi I'm failing to build the 'gate' application following the instructions in: - http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/constructor_notes - http://blogs.sun.com/sunwg11nprg/entry/how_to_create_opensolaris_distribution1 a) Does anyone know where I can find information on the 'gate' project? gate is the generic name at Sun for a project SCM repository. In that case gate is referring to the pkg(5) project, which you can hg clone from: ssh://a...@hg.opensolaris.org/hg/pkg/gate The web page and mailing list for more information about pkg(5) can be found at: http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+pkg/WebHome -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
We were promised de-dupe would be available a couple months after we first purchased the units in December of 2008. I'm surprised that Sun sales reps were pushing OpenSolaris as enterprise-ready, given the analogy often made, which I accept, between RHEL : Fedora and Solaris 10 : OpenSolaris. I'm extremely happy with snv_134, and sing praises for OpenSolaris every chance I get, but I only use it as a desktop/home server. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
The BFU for b136 was made available in the past 24 hours: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b136/ (although http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/ still points to a nightly build as I am writing this post) The BFU for b135 has been available for a around 4 weeks (give or take a few days). Given previous history (the past 2 years), this *usually* means that the previous BFU release is in the process of being cut and released. However, also given the past 2 opensolaris releases, and that b134 was originally slated as the 2010.03 release, I am not expecting to see ISO / USB images releases for for anything past b135 until approx 2 weeks after the 2010.03 (or what ever this will now be called). I personally think that bug id 6924824 (and related cases) is a show stopper for 2010.03. Speculation and opinion: I think the unified storage platform (ie - 7000 series) would generate significantly more revenue that opensolaris support contracts, thus show stoppers for that platform would probably drive fixing the bug sooner, provided customers are logging support incidents as Sev1 / Sev2. Darren Mackay http://www.sikkra.com/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/velitium/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
Are you running a development build or the unified storage distro? Currently, *I believe* that the only supported release for zfs dedup was 2010.Q1 of the unified storage platform - perhaps someone else can correct me if my understanding is wrong here 2010.Q1 was only released 10th March. If you are running a dev build (which based on your post, I think this is the case - please correct me if my interpretation is wrong), I think you are very very brave running a dev build in prod... Especially as there has never been any formal support of development builds that I am aware. You do have another option though - but it will probably cost... Given you have 00's of TB of deduped data already... If this is critical to the business, and the business cannot wait, you could approach you account and engage oracle professional services to write the fix you require, particularly if no dates have been provided when a fix will be released. Again, if this is business critical, you could approach Pawel Dawidek from the BSD community - he gave a talk on GEOM at the Kernel Conf in Brisbane last year, and he seemed very knowledgeable on the ZFS code-base - he may also be able to assist, or direct you to someone who can. Internally, we have fairly good knowledge of parts of the ZFS code-base - so we may be able to assist. But our expertise is elsewhere in the ZFS code-base, and not in the dedup code. You best option will still be to approach your account exec directly Although I think my reply to the original poster re this issue being a show stopper may accelerate the natural order in the universe... I can only suggest sitting tight. Cheers, and good luck. Darren Mackay http://www.sikkra.com/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/velitium/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] onnv 135 MIA? Skipped or delayed? (knock, knock) Is this Mic turned on?...
I support Solaris and I have no idea what is going on with Open... I check here daily now just like the rest of you. @bjones: I suggest that you push back on your SAM re this point...daily. @darren08: Opening SR's on this as Sev 1/2 will not do much to speed things along I am afraid. The classification system is so badly misused/abused by customers that I must admit that I triage my assigns and apply my own internal classification based upon my assessment of each issue (taking into account, of course, the customer's contact level and their respective SLA). This is not to say do not open them, just make sure that you provide a good clear problem description, cite relevant CRs and ask that the issue be sent straight to the back line OS tier for treatment. regards Ray ray dot mroz AT oracle dot com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running?
My console overfloweth with this rot : message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? The rate is just silly .. here is what I see when I run 'date' on the console ( or at least I try ) twice in fairly rapid sequence : # date message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? Sat Apr 3 01:25:43 GMT 2010 # date message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? Sat Apr 3 01:25:46 GMT 2010 # message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? datmessage overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? emessage overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? Sat Apr 3 01:25:56 GMT 2010 # damessage overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? te Sat Apr 3 01:26:00 GMT 2010 # message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? This renders the console useless and fills up the syslogs. I can type 'svcs -xv | grep log' in some other xterm and then paste it into this console session to see : # svcs -av | grep log message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running? legacy_run - 1:20:54 94 lrc:/etc/rc2_d/S94ncalogd disabled - 1:18:12 - svc:/system/console-login:vt2 disabled - 1:18:12 - svc:/system/console-login:vt3 disabled - 1:18:12 - svc:/system/console-login:vt4 disabled - 1:18:12 - svc:/system/console-login:vt5 disabled - 1:18:12 - svc:/system/console-login:vt6 disabled - 1:18:24 - svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default disabled - 1:21:17 - svc:/network/login:eklogin disabled - 1:21:17 - svc:/network/login:klogin disabled - 1:21:18 - svc:/network/login:rlogin disabled - 1:36:32 - svc:/application/graphical-login/cde-login:default online - 1:20:34 78 svc:/system/console-login:default online - 1:20:36 76
[osol-discuss] SUNWonbld.i386.tar.bz2 missing /opt/onbld/bin/acr
This is sort of a show stopper : Entering post-bfu protected environment (shell: ksh). Edit configuration files as necessary, then reboot. bfu# ksh /opt/onbld/bin/acr ksh: /opt/onbld/bin/acr: not found bfu# -- Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUNWonbld.i386.tar.bz2 missing /opt/onbld/bin/acr
On 04/ 2/10 11:38 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: This is sort of a show stopper : Entering post-bfu protected environment (shell: ksh). Edit configuration files as necessary, then reboot. bfu# ksh /opt/onbld/bin/acr ksh: /opt/onbld/bin/acr: not found bfu# While BFU is still available, ACR is not. Please refer to the ON flag day notice: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2010-March/001603.html Cheers, -Shawn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUNWonbld.i386.tar.bz2 missing /opt/onbld/bin/acr
Dennis Clarke wrote: This is sort of a show stopper : Entering post-bfu protected environment (shell: ksh). Edit configuration files as necessary, then reboot. bfu# ksh /opt/onbld/bin/acr ksh: /opt/onbld/bin/acr: not found The removal of acr as the first step towards the retirement of bfu was noted (though a bit briefly) in a recent (b136) flag day: http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100302184109.html -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
