Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
Today I had to listen to Red Hat drone on about what is forthcoming in RHEL6. Throughout I kept yawning and thinking, I've done that in AIX since 2001 or They're only now getting that? Really, what is the draw to Linux? It reminds me of a Fisher-Price or Playskool operating system. How can I realistically not laugh at their product when they tout a new feature that I've been using for 10 years on AIX? And if you want to use their Satellite server to manager your RHEL servers you have to fork over lots of money, whereas with AIX I don't have to pay anything to setup and utilize a NIM server which provides the same functionality as Satellite, and has been around for so, so long. With NIM, I can also install Linux servers! ext4 is getting online defragmentation. Yawn. AIX has had defragfs for as long as I've used it that I can remember. I don't recall reading that ext4 has dynamic i-node allocation either. Something JFS2 has had for years. I really don't take Linux seriously and cannot understand how people think it is the be-all of operating systems when they are a decade behind AIX. And how they think it is so cost effective when you have to pay for what is free in AIX. AIX technologies do sound impressive but i would lose many of the features I like If I would switch If I run AIX i can't: build my own systems run Netbeans ( may work with PowerVM) run Vitrualbox read,modified,reuse source code( my favorite ) force to purchase $5000+ IBM power unit or take a risk with a unit from ebay. those are just a few reason how AIX would be an inferior OS that would put me in UNIX's primitive era, no thanks It would be nice though if IBM AIX386 was still under developing and ran on todays x86 then I would consider it. “How ya' gonna' do it? PS/2 It! It's as easy as I.B.M.” “How ya' gonna' do it? PS/2 It! The solution is I.B.M.” -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
On 6/5/2010 12:42 AM, Edward Martinez wrote: Today I had to listen to Red Hat drone on about what is forthcoming in RHEL6. Throughout I kept yawning and thinking, I've done that in AIX since 2001 or They're only now getting that? Really, what is the draw to Linux? It reminds me of a Fisher-Price or Playskool operating system. How can I realistically not laugh at their product when they tout a new feature that I've been using for 10 years on AIX? And if you want to use their Satellite server to manager your RHEL servers you have to fork over lots of money, whereas with AIX I don't have to pay anything to setup and utilize a NIM server which provides the same functionality as Satellite, and has been around for so, so long. With NIM, I can also install Linux servers! ext4 is getting online defragmentation. Yawn. AIX has had defragfs for as long as I've used it that I can remember. I don't recall reading that ext4 has dynamic i-node allocation either. Something JFS2 has had for years. I really don't take Linux seriously and cannot understand how people think it is the be-all of operating systems when they are a decade behind AIX. And how they think it is so cost effective when you have to pay for what is free in AIX. AIX technologies do sound impressive but i would lose many of the features I like If I would switch If I run AIX i can't: build my own systems run Netbeans ( may work with PowerVM) run Vitrualbox read,modified,reuse source code( my favorite ) force to purchase $5000+ IBM power unit or take a risk with a unit from ebay. those are just a few reason how AIX would be an inferior OS that would put me in UNIX's primitive era, no thanks It would be nice though if IBM AIX386 was still under developing and ran on todays x86 then I would consider it. “How ya' gonna' do it? PS/2 It! It's as easy as I.B.M.” “How ya' gonna' do it? PS/2 It! The solution is I.B.M.” Sadly, I think that's really AIX's biggest weakness: there's no foot-in-the-door path. I also think that's something that Oracle really, desperately needs to avoid losing: the ability for entry-level people to get ahold of, and really, really, have a chance to thoroughly use, Solaris. By use I mean play with all the nice advanced features that it can do. I realize you're not going to make a lot of money off these folks (but, hey, you could make /some/), but they're the next gen folks who will be specifying hardware for you. AIX's problem right now is that the new generation (let's face it, anyone under 30) is pretty much totally ignorant of what it really can do, and isn't going to have the chance to learn much - they'll have to be hired into an IBM shop for something completely non-IBMish, and that's a tough road to hoe for getting people exposed to your product. If we can keep (Open)Solaris out there, with an extremely low barrier-to-entry, we can compete for the Linuxes for mindshare, if not marketshare. Because, really, Linux is great for a lot of things, but running solid, simply-managed, robust, scalable systems isn't one of them. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
Hi All; Just one point from my side. I started with linux and then switched to Solaris. Because at that time Linux was easily available on x86. But what made me switch to Solaris, is certification was available for Solaris 8 only at that time, nearly 9 years back. Then I realized the power on UNIX. The point is people/Compannies are not in love with Linux. They are in love with platform it runs on and i.e x86. Solaris will do well if we fill the package gap between Linux and Solaris. Simple packages like postfix is missing from Opensolaris. I know I can get it from blastwave, but that's an extra effort which lot of new users don't like. First time experience should be good, if you want to get new people adopt OpenSolaris. Ashish Nabira Enterprise IT Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. 7th floor , Prestige Obelisk, Kasturba Rd Bangalore, KN 560025 IN Phone x89854/+91 8066930 854 Mobile +919845082183 Email ashish.nab...@sun.com On 05-Jun-10, at 1:54 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: On 6/5/2010 12:42 AM, Edward Martinez wrote: Today I had to listen to Red Hat drone on about what is forthcoming in RHEL6. Throughout I kept yawning and thinking, I've done that in AIX since 2001 or They're only now getting that? Really, what is the draw to Linux? It reminds me of a Fisher-Price or Playskool operating system. How can I realistically not laugh at their product when they tout a new feature that I've been using for 10 years on AIX? And if you want to use their Satellite server to manager your RHEL servers you have to fork over lots of money, whereas with AIX I don't have to pay anything to setup and utilize a NIM server which provides the same functionality as Satellite, and has been around for so, so long. With NIM, I can also install Linux servers! ext4 is getting online defragmentation. Yawn. AIX has had defragfs for as long as I've used it that I can remember. I don't recall reading that ext4 has dynamic i-node allocation either. Something JFS2 has had for years. I really don't take Linux seriously and cannot understand how people think it is the be-all of operating systems when they are a decade behind AIX. And how they think it is so cost effective when you have to pay for what is free in AIX. AIX technologies do sound impressive but i would lose many of the features I like If I would switch If I run AIX i can't: build my own systems run Netbeans ( may work with PowerVM) run Vitrualbox read,modified,reuse source code( my favorite ) force to purchase $5000+ IBM power unit or take a risk with a unit from ebay. those are just a few reason how AIX would be an inferior OS that would put me in UNIX's primitive era, no thanks It would be nice though if IBM AIX386 was still under developing and ran on todays x86 then I would consider it. “How ya' gonna' do it? PS/2 It! It's as easy as I.B.M.” “How ya' gonna' do it? PS/2 It! The solution is I.B.M.” Sadly, I think that's really AIX's biggest weakness: there's no foot- in-the-door path. I also think that's something that Oracle really, desperately needs to avoid losing: the ability for entry-level people to get ahold of, and really, really, have a chance to thoroughly use, Solaris. By use I mean play with all the nice advanced features that it can do. I realize you're not going to make a lot of money off these folks (but, hey, you could make /some/), but they're the next gen folks who will be specifying hardware for you. AIX's problem right now is that the new generation (let's face it, anyone under 30) is pretty much totally ignorant of what it really can do, and isn't going to have the chance to learn much - they'll have to be hired into an IBM shop for something completely non-IBMish, and that's a tough road to hoe for getting people exposed to your product. If we can keep (Open)Solaris out there, with an extremely low barrier- to-entry, we can compete for the Linuxes for mindshare, if not marketshare. Because, really, Linux is great for a lot of things, but running solid, simply-managed, robust, scalable systems isn't one of them. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] fmd core dumps in svn_134
At this point, I think we're definitely out of package territory as far as bugs are concerned. I'd suggest posting a link to this bug on opensolaris-discuss along with this information (that I took from your core files): ::stack libc_hwcap1.so.1`_lwp_kill+7(1, 6, 80477c8, fee8b2b6) libc_hwcap1.so.1`raise+0x22(6, 0, 8047818, fee6221e) libc_hwcap1.so.1`abort+0xf2(3a646d66, 4f424120, 203a5452, 6c696166, 74206465, 706f206f) fmd_vpanic+0x125(808af6c, 8047c54, 3eb, fed660b4) fmd_panic+0x12(808af6c, fed7ab10, 8047c6c, 807e727) fmd_topo_update+0x14a(1, 0, 8047d98, 8060e12) fmd_topo_init+0xd(0, 0, 0, 4000, 80854b8, 0) fmd_run+0x14f(809d818, 4, 8047e18, 8074d8b) main+0x2fa(1, 8047e4c, 8047e54, feffb804) _start+0x7d(1, 8047eec, 0, 8047f00, 8047f19, 8047f2a) ::status debugging core file of fmd (32-bit) from opensolaris file: /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd initial argv: /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd threading model: native threads status: process terminated by SIGABRT (Abort), pid=859 uid=0 code=-1 see https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15140 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Osol - pkg inst an earlier revision?
Hi all, I hit some bug in libtheora. I use recordmysolaris quite frequently, and libtheoraenc.so 1.1.2 (that's the current version if I recall correctly) encodes the uncompressed file badly into ogv. I'm on sxce (125), so I popped in an earlier dvd (117) (ok: I mounted an earlier image :)), pkgrm'ed SUNWlibtheora, and added an earlier version. I have a b134 Osol as well, and libtheora's version is the same on that host (1.1.2). It was easy to install the older one on sxce (since I have the iso), but how can I do that on Osol? Thanks in advance! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
On 05/06/2010 09:24, Erik Trimble wrote: Sadly, I think that's really AIX's biggest weakness: there's no foot-in-the-door path. I also think that's something that Oracle really, desperately needs to avoid losing: the ability for entry-level people to get ahold of, and really, really, have a chance to thoroughly use, Solaris. By use I mean play with all the nice advanced features that it can do. I realize you're not going to make a lot of money off these folks (but, hey, you could make /some/), but they're the next gen folks who will be specifying hardware for you. AIX's problem right now is that the new generation (let's face it, anyone under 30) is pretty much totally ignorant of what it really can do, and isn't going to have the chance to learn much - they'll have to be hired into an IBM shop for something completely non-IBMish, and that's a tough road to hoe for getting people exposed to your product. If we can keep (Open)Solaris out there, with an extremely low barrier-to-entry, we can compete for the Linuxes for mindshare, if not marketshare. Because, really, Linux is great for a lot of things, but running solid, simply-managed, robust, scalable systems isn't one of them. 100% agree. -- Robert Milkowski http://milek.blogspot.com ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to set NFS permissions
Glad you got it going...Lisandro --Original Message-- From: Duncan Groenewald Sender: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] How to set NFS permissions Sent: Jun 4, 2010 10:12 AM You're a star thanks. The /bin/chmod did the trick !! thanks so much, this has been bugging me for years !! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem: Very long delay before login prompt(GDM splash)
Hi robin, I have been experiencing network slowdowns myself and it all happened as I moved from release to 134...I am also wondering what things change at the network layer...Lisandro Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Robin Axelsson gu99r...@student.chalmers.se Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:33:08 To: Владимир Новосельцевblackn...@tut.by Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Problem: Very long delay before login prompt (GDM splash) On 2010-06-02 21:37, Владимир Новосельцев wrote: 02.06.2010 14:02, Robin Axelsson пишет: On 2010-05-12 23:48, Mark Martin wrote: On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robin Axelsson gu99r...@student.chalmers.se wrote: I'm not using any particular locale (I use the default system language) and I use a Swedish keyboard layout. The keyboard is a Logitech keyboard connected via the PS/2 port and the mouse is a Logitech USB mouse. Also note that this delay has not been there all the time. Even after I upgraded to snv_b134 the login was normal. But then something happened quite recently, I don't know what it is. The only thing I've been tampering with in the system is the network configuration files such as /etc/host, /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/inet/inodes since I was resolving problems with slow ssh logins. I have a feeling that some configuration file was corrupted when the system was shut down. This is just a hunch and I may be terribly wrong. The system has I don't have a specific test for you to perform at the moment, but my first instinct, when I read your initial post some days ago, was that this was very indicative of a network timeout. I'm not a gnome expert by any means, so I'm glad Brian is helping, but I'd not give up the network configuration angle as another possible configuration issue. Especially since you mention you recently changed nsswitch.conf (and friends). Additionally, it occurs to me during Brian's troubleshooting with you that that sort of thing (network timeout) is often not logged with a default configuration, which is why you wouldn't see it in any of the normal logs. I suspect truss'ing would eventually find the network timeout issue if that really is the culprit. One thing you can try to do, though, in the mean time, is try using simpler (or older) versions of nsswitch.conf (try with just files or dns). If you recently added ldap for any reason, then I might even be persuaded to put money down on a bet. . I removed the dns in the ipnodes entry (which is automatically added by DHCP which I believe is the NWAM). I rebooted afterwards and the same delay remains. I also noticed that the DNS was automatically added back efter reboot. Perhaps you could guide me on what service I should restart to make the changes of nsswitch.conf to take effect on Gnome without intervention of NWAM. I have always used NWAM and DHCP even before this problem occurred so I don't think there is a problem in the nsswitch.conf that causes this problem and I have not added any entry for ldap as can be seen in what I provided in my previous post. I also noted that the same delay occurs immedately after I relogin when I want to open up a terminal in Gnome. I click several times on several places to start the terminal. I get the Starting terminal ... at the bottom of the screen but then it disappears and nothing happens. After a few minutes the screen i cluttered with many open terminals. From then on I can launch new terminals without delay. This only happens on occasion. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Hi, can you revert /etc/hosts to default one? I've been running into similar issue on FreeBSD if mine /etc/hosts have missing some records, can't remember now that exactly. WBR, Vladimir Novoseltsev . I reverted the /etc/hosts file and the problem with the login splash disappeared! Thank you for that suggestion! ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Can anyone tell me what the Container Packagesare now called?
You should be fine by upgrading to 134 from dev repository...Lisandro --Original Message-- From: Sean . Sender: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Can anyone tell me what the Container Packagesare now called? Sent: Jun 4, 2010 8:32 AM Thanks Guys, Delrio I think you've hit the nail on the head. I'll see if I can add the dev repo as a mirror. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
My first preference for a UNIX operating system is AIX (as I'm sure anyone can figure that out by now), followed by Solaris/OpenSolaris. I'm just disgruntled by Oracle. Next on my list would be FreeBSD/OpenBSD (I've never used NetBSD). I'd prefer to never touch Linux if I didn't have to, but necessary because of work. One feature I'd like to see OpenSolaris adopt for Zones is the AIX application workload partition. In AIX, there are system and application partitions, and application partitions only exist to run a specific application or job and then the partition is destroyed. This is a very useful feature that should be incorporated into OpenSolaris. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Osol - pkg inst an earlier revision?
On 06/ 5/10 07:22 AM, Attila Nagy wrote: Hi all, I hit some bug in libtheora. I use recordmysolaris quite frequently, and libtheoraenc.so 1.1.2 (that's the current version if I recall correctly) encodes the uncompressed file badly into ogv. I'm on sxce (125), so I popped in an earlier dvd (117) (ok: I mounted an earlier image :)), pkgrm'ed SUNWlibtheora, and added an earlier version. I have a b134 Osol as well, and libtheora's version is the same on that host (1.1.2). It was easy to install the older one on sxce (since I have the iso), but how can I do that on Osol? *If* there's an earlier version of the package available for build 134, then you could install it by uninstalling the current package first, and then installing the new one specifying the version. But I suspect you want to install an older version of this library from a much older build which you cannot do using the package system. Cheers, -Shawn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Osol - pkg inst an earlier revision?
On 06/ 5/10 12:16 PM, Attila Nagy wrote: Aha, thanks for the info! I suspect this is by design so, am I right? Correct. Does this worth an RFE? I understand that this feature can/may cause troubles (only if used, of course :)), but - if used with caution, and, say a zfs snapshot :) - could come handy sometimes! It's been discussed, but it really isn't a supportable feature. The whole purpose of a package system is to ensure the correct installation and operation of software on your system. Adding the ability to override that sort of defeats the purpose of a package system. Cheers, -Shawn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Osol - pkg inst an earlier revision?
Yes, the question of support(-ability) - I wanted to add this thought to my previous post. I understand (too) that this option would complicate things - even a lot in certain cases... :) Thanks for the info and help, Attila -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
On 6/5/2010 8:15 AM, bsd wrote: My first preference for a UNIX operating system is AIX (as I'm sure anyone can figure that out by now), followed by Solaris/OpenSolaris. I'm just disgruntled by Oracle. Next on my list would be FreeBSD/OpenBSD (I've never used NetBSD). I'd prefer to never touch Linux if I didn't have to, but necessary because of work. One feature I'd like to see OpenSolaris adopt for Zones is the AIX application workload partition. In AIX, there are system and application partitions, and application partitions only exist to run a specific application or job and then the partition is destroyed. This is a very useful feature that should be incorporated into OpenSolaris. That's an interesting feature, but I'm kinda hard-pressed to see how an application zone would differ much from a system zone - the application still needs everything that a system zone would provide. Other than dis-allowing other applications to start, and quick startup time, how else does an app zone differ from a system zone? That's one thing I've never timed in Solaris - exactly how long it takes to start up a zone. I've always just done it at startup time, though I'm starting to get to the point where I need to dynamically start/stop zone during runs... -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Zones with other virtualization techs on the same host
Is it possible to use zones and xen or virtual box simultaneously on the same host? Sent from my Nexus One. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Zones with other virtualization techs on the same host
On 6/5/2010 7:50 PM, Brandon High wrote: Is it possible to use zones and xen or virtual box simultaneously on the same host? I use zones and virtualbox on my opensolaris desktop, no problem. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote: [...] Sadly, I think that's really AIX's biggest weakness: there's no foot-in-the-door path. I also think that's something that Oracle really, desperately needs to avoid losing: the ability for entry-level people to get ahold of, and really, really, have a chance to thoroughly use, Solaris. By use I mean play with all the nice advanced features that it can do. I realize you're not going to make a lot of money off these folks (but, hey, you could make /some/), but they're the next gen folks who will be specifying hardware for you. AIX's problem right now is that the new generation (let's face it, anyone under 30) is pretty much totally ignorant of what it really can do, and isn't going to have the chance to learn much - they'll have to be hired into an IBM shop for something completely non-IBMish, and that's a tough road to hoe for getting people exposed to your product. If we can keep (Open)Solaris out there, with an extremely low barrier-to-entry, we can compete for the Linuxes for mindshare, if not marketshare. Because, really, Linux is great for a lot of things, but running solid, simply-managed, robust, scalable systems isn't one of them. I agree 100%. If Sun had been serious about Solaris x86 (meaning putting some money and support behind getting developers - particularly desktop developers) in the mid-90's, I seriously doubt Linux would have ever made it out of the gate. Contrary to what the upper management always said, Sun was NOT a hardware company. They were a systems company. Not understanding that simple fact, even though that is what their customers kept telling them, is why the pretty blue has been turned into the ugly red. *sigh* fpsm ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SUN not doing well under Oracle.
Yes, the application zone still needs the same files as a system zone, however, the application zone will be created to run a process, and when the process is finished it is destroyed. If you did a list of wpar's after the application zone was run, it wouldn't be listed. A very simplistic example would be, say I'm running ddclient and I don't want it to impact of maybe have a security flaw expose my system by letting it run as a daemon, and don't want the overhead of a zone constantly being there. ddclient can run in an application partition, and after ddclient is done, goodbye wpar. When it needs to update next, the partition is created, then again destroyed. Of course that is simplistic as an example, but it could be replaced by any other application. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Where is OpenSolaris 2010 release?
OpenSolaris 2010.02... 03... 04... 05... 06! Where is new OpenSolaris release? Any position? I founded together with Eduardo Kislanski the Brazilian portal OpenYourSource.com, dedicated for Solaris and OpenSolaris news, articles and tips. We are concerned with the OpenSolaris future. Any news? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Zones with other virtualization techs on the same host
Le 06/06/10 01:50, Brandon High a écrit : Is it possible to use zones and xen or virtual box simultaneously on the same host? Sent from my Nexus One. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org I use bothe zones and xvm guests on the same xvm host (b134). ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Upgrade to snv_134 dev branch errors
I've just done a clean install of 2009.06 followed by an update of the stable branch. Next I've made a new BE, booted into it and updated to dev branch according to instructions at http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/en/index.shtml The update created appeared to succeed, but had these error messages: Update Phase 31993/32054 driver (aggr) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Update Phase 32015/32054 driver (softmac) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Update Phase 32016/32054 driver (vnic) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Update Phase 32029/32054 driver (ibd) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Update Phase 32036/32054 driver (dnet) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Update Phase 32037/32054 driver (elxl) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Update Phase 32038/32054 driver (iprb) upgrade (removal of policy'read_priv_set=net_rawaccess write_priv_set=net_rawaccess) failed: minor node spec required. Is any of this a concern? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
