Re: Question: Should I sell my MZ-S?

2006-05-16 Thread Pat White
I did a model shoot last Saturday with my MZ-S and that camera is a real 
pleasure to use.  It focussed perfectly in the dim studio, my D200-using 
buddy was impressed with the results, and the model was pleased with the 60 
prints that I gave her (my cost $0.00, since the second set was free this 
week;  it's usually $0.99 (hmm, these computer keyboards got no cents key)).


I plan to use the MZ-S for a long time to come.

Pat White 





Re: Is this what I think it is?

2006-04-22 Thread Pat White

Aaron wrote:

Happens with mine all the time.  Maybe you need a CLA.

Thanks for the tip, Aaron!  Now I can define the indefinable feeling that it 
wasn't working 100%.  I'll book a CLA on Monday!


Pat White




Re: Is this what I think it is?

2006-04-22 Thread Pat White
SIGHT OF MIGHTY P67 CAUSES MODELS TO DOFF CLOTHES AND HUG NEAREST PERSON!!! 
Wait a minute, that doesn't happen with my 67!  Is the power in the wooden 
grip?


Pat White 





Re: Sorta OT: Old bike racing photos (Daytona)

2006-03-08 Thread Pat White

Thanks for the link to SuperbikePlanet, Mark.  Some cool shots there!

Now for the gee-it-was-tough-back-in-the-day part:  Daytona is a 
21-to-24-hour drive from Toronto, done non-stop if you have two drivers. 
Since there's a strong likelihood of mountain storms on I-95 in early March, 
you'd take I-75 all the way from Detroit, but you might have to drive 
through blizzards from Toronto until you were well south of the Motor City.


After all that, it sure was pleasant to see palm trees and wear shorts, and 
maybe even have your streetbike to ride if you'd had room to bring it along.


Pat White 





Re: Sorta OT: Old bike racing photos (Daytona)

2006-03-08 Thread Pat White
Never been to Daytona!  What?  You've still got time to make it down for the 
200 on Sunday the 12th.  Get packing!


It's great fun, and sure makes a nice break from an eastern Canadian or 
northeastern US winter.


Check http://www.daytonainternationalspeedway.com/

and http://www.daytonainternationalspeedway.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=1118 
for the schedule.


I photographed Eddie Lawson winning in 1986 on his FZ750 (that was magic for 
me), then after the race, I had to brake suddenly to let him run in front of 
my car as I was driving through the garage area.  He didn't stop to chat, 
but I got to shake his hand and get an autograph on his photo in a copy of 
Motocourse when he appeared at the Toronto International Motorcycle Show in 
2000 or so.


Speed Week really is amazing.  All sorts of oddball vehicles, and quite a 
few oddball people.  Lots of racing, too.  Even the dirt track racing at 
Daytona Beach Municipal Stadium is really exciting.  You've gotta make the 
pilgrimage down there one of these years. 





Sorta OT: Old bike racing photos (Daytona)

2006-03-08 Thread Pat White
Thanks for those vintage photos, Mark!  They really brought back some 
memories.  Do you recall the exact year they were taken?  It looks like 1972 
or 1973.  Is it just me, or does Cal Rayborn look like George Thorogood?  Is 
that Paul Smart chatting up the girl on the pit wall?


In 1974 and 1975 I was at Daytona as a race mechanic (1974 for Frank Gamble 
on TZ250 and 1975 for Ernie White's rider Brian Henderson on TZ250 and 
TZ750).  As well, I raced a TD-3 in Canada and at Nelson Ledges in '74 and 
'75.


The RD and RZs came later ('82-'84), after a six-year layoff to build up my 
income to where I could actually afford to race.  My last race bike was the 
FZ750 in 1985, and I still have it.


Do you have anymore vintage pix to show in this 2006 Daytona Speed Week?

Pat White 





Re: Why is 35mm film sometimes called 135?

2006-03-02 Thread Pat White

Graywolf mentioned:

Come to think of it, still around when I was a kid: steam locamotives, 
Street cars, orange crates, Great Lakes freighters, local ammusment parks, 
flat-head engines, propeller airliners, etc. All those things were pretty 
much gone by 1960. And many of the things we take for granted now did not 
exist. And I am not even old, quite yet.


Coming soon, to an energy-guzzling country near you: horse-drawn vehicles.

Pat responds:

Gone by 1960?  You can still see some of those things in Toronto in 2006. 
Big freighters still ply the Great Lakes, docking often at TO (Toronto), 
propeller airliners (Bombardier Dash-7 and Dash-8 turboprops) take off and 
land every day at Toronto Island Airport, with passengers taking the 
400-foot ferry ride from the foot of Bathurst Street (world's shortest ferry 
ride, I'm told), and last but not least, Toronto's streetcars are an 
integral part of the transit system.


Toronto's not in a time warp.  This is technology that still works 
effectively.


Pat White




Re: Re: RE"CAPS"

2006-02-13 Thread Pat White
Bill, people don't tell you what's wrong with you?  Count yourself lucky! 
People are always telling me what they think is wrong with me!


Pat White 





Re: PESO: Another nude

2006-02-02 Thread Pat White
Hmm, donut...  When I'm working with models, I offer them soft drinks and 
leave out bowls of almonds, regular and chocolate covered.  After all, they 
need energy to replace the heat lost while working nude.  I rarely see the 
model snacking, but the chocolate-covered almonds seem to evaporate.  Now I 
call them "model food".


Pat White 





RE: PESO: Another nude

2006-02-02 Thread Pat White
Nice shot, William!  I like the way the light wraps around her.  Did you 
remind here to suck in her gut?  That's always the last thing I say before 
pressing the shutter.  Ignore that comment if you got just the pose you 
wanted.


Pat White




Re: OT: Need to Vent

2006-01-10 Thread Pat White
Jostein commented:  "Next time I travel, I will try to wear my 500/4.5... 
:-)"


When I travelled on charter flights with a 5 kg carry-on limit, I often wore 
some of my photo gear, since my loaded camera bag weighs over 7 kg, not 
counting film, plus I stick it in my carry-on bag, along with shaver and 
underwear.  Accordingly, I wore the MZ-S on a strap around my neck, with 
70-200 2.8 attached, put the flash in a pocket, perhaps a short lens in 
another pocket, and all the film in still another pocket.  The big lens 
usually attracts some attention, so I've sometimes had to remove it so 
security can have a look through it.


Naturally, it all goes back in the bag once I'm past security.  The onboard 
staff sometimes ask why it's so heavy when they hoist it into the overhead 
bin, but I say nothing.  The modern 11 kg limit is more sensible and much 
easier to deal with.


As for checked luggage, the 20 kg charter limit can be a problem.  One time 
I took "20 kg, 2 suitcases"  to mean "2 suitcases, each weighing max 20 kg", 
not 20 kg total.  Oops!  When I stated that I needed both bags, I was asked 
what was in the second bag.  I mentioned mask, fins, and snorkel, and was 
told, "Oh, sports gear, that's alright!  The second bag is fine."  After 
that, I'd throw in the snorkel gear so I could bring my lighting stands, 
reflectors, and extra clothes (I used to be ready for any model shooting 
opportunity).  Now, with the 30 kg limit, life is much simpler.


Pat White 





Re: PESO: Sylvester at the Door

2006-01-05 Thread Pat White
Nice shot, Frank!  It has more of a mood than a typical kitty photo.  I like 
it, and think it might work as a stock photo.


Pat White 





Re: pointless photo project, any suggestions?

2006-01-05 Thread Pat White
Krisjanis, since it consists of pictures of the sky, it seems logical to 
display it overhead.  Blow it up sufficiently large to cover the ceiling of 
a room, or possibly to cover the ceiling and the upper part of the walls. 
At that size,each frame would have recognizable detail, adding to the total 
effect.


Pat White 





Re: Photokina!

2005-12-21 Thread Pat White

Frank wrote:

"I'm getting happy.

And younger.

Go figure!  "


Ah, so you're the one!  I read about you in "Now Wait For Last Year", by 
Philip K. Dick.


Pat White




Re: PESO: "You give it a title..." :)

2005-12-16 Thread Pat White
Perhaps serene was not the look the artist wanted.  A serene look would have 
been a bit of a cliche.  The look of exasperation (that's how it looks to 
me) adds an interesting incongruity.  I like the beads trailing on the 
floor, too.


For a title:  "Am I missing my favourite TV show right now?"

Pat White 





RE: PESO -- Oh Deer

2005-12-16 Thread Pat White
I've also found the 28-200 lacking, both in sharpness and speed, but it is 
very handy at parties, allowing you to zoom in to catch an expression, or 
zoom out for a group shot.  For everyday use, I carry a 28-70 f4, and pop 
the FA20-35 f4 and the Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX in the knapsack if I'm expecting 
to see anything especially interesting.


The 28-70 f4 doesn't come with a hood, but doesn't seem to need one, either, 
which makes it effectively more compact and quicker to use.


Pat White 





Re: I use film....

2005-12-16 Thread Pat White
Then there's the philosophical objection:  a negative is an image, a digital 
file is a description of an image.


I'm still happily using my MZ-S.

Pat White 





Re: OT:ever been ripped off online

2005-11-19 Thread Pat White
Thanks for that posting, Feroze!  That's a wild story.  I'm up to page 42 or 
so, and wondering how it will end.  It seems to be on forums all over the 
world now, with people from Canada, Australia, and the UK logging in, all 
over a smartass 19-year-old who just won't get a clue.


http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=399203

Pat 





Re: My first PESO

2005-11-17 Thread Pat White

Bob wrote:

Anyway, it is sort of a tradition in painting and photography that artistic 
nudes not make eye contact with the camera.



That used to be one of the factors separating art from porn:  eye contact = 
porn, no eye contact = art.  Another was, color = porn, B&W = art. 
Hopefully, things aren't that superficial anymore.


Pat White 





Re: My first PESO

2005-11-17 Thread Pat White

Re your standing nude:  a classic, timeless style.  Very nice!

As well,  I agree about the American magazines being afraid to publish nudes 
these days.  Hopefully the current nervous climate won't last forever.


Pat White 





Re: where am i?

2005-11-04 Thread Pat White
Let's see, could you be at the Castle Aarghh, as referred to in Monty Python 
and the Holy Grail?


Pat White 





Re: Another Question on Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Pat White
Gold and Goose, the famous British motorcycle racing photographers, use a 
fanny pack to support the bottom of the monopod, in order to be able to pan 
to follow the action.  Manfrotto even makes a special waist pouch for the 
purpose, similar to what a flag-bearer in a parade might use.


You can see a sample of Gold and Goose's work at: 
http://www.cyclenews.com/ShowStory.asp?HeadlineID=5826


Unfortunately, their website at http://www.gngpix.com/home.asp is "designed 
as a delivery tool for the media. Access will not be granted to the general 
public.", meaning there's no photos to see there.


Pat White 





Re: Annoying print layout

2005-11-01 Thread Pat White
While we're on the topic, does anyone know how to print from IE without 
losing the right side of the text?  Most times when I print something, the 
right-hand margin and four or five characters are off the edge of the paper. 
Sounds like a beginner's issue, but I've yet to hear the solution.


Pat White 





Re: OT Survey - Computer Desk-top Size

2005-10-31 Thread Pat White
Dell 19-inch CRT (18-inch viewable) at 1024x768, plus old 14-inch CRT 
(13-inch viewable) at 800x600, both uncalibrated (I know, I'm a slacker).


Pat White 





Re: OT-- Paranoia

2005-09-28 Thread Pat White
I agree with Paul.  Cork gaskets are always shrinking a bit.  Anytime I 
checked my rocker cover bolts or oil pan bolts, most of the bolts (or 
screws, to be more precise) could take a turn or two of tightening.


Pat White 





Re: Got my *ist D this morning

2005-09-15 Thread Pat White
Frank wrote:  But, I'll be fine going up and down the mountains.  Are they 
bigger

out there than in Ontario?  

Parts of Dufferin Street in TO are as hilly as anything in Victoria.  The 
Rockies, on the other hand...


Pat White




Re: Got my *ist D this morning

2005-09-15 Thread Pat White

TOPDML, one of the few things I miss about Toronto...

Pat White



Re: OT: Another quiz!

2005-09-13 Thread Pat White

Jon said:  "Looks like I'm Apollo."

You can't be Apollo!  I'm Apollo! 


Pat White



Re: PESO - Deep Blue Something

2005-09-11 Thread Pat White
Very nice shot, Boris!  I like the composition, and the frame works well, 
too.  I've seen quite a few shots in magazines by photographic artists that 
were similar in concept but not as good as yours.


Pat White 





Re: How do you mount a reversed 50?

2005-09-03 Thread Pat White
The reverse adapter has a K-mount on one side, and a filter thread on the 
other side, so you can attach the adapter to the front of the lens, and then 
carefully attach the lens and adapter to the camera.  Lens settings are 
completely manual, since the lens mount is not connected to the camera, 
although you can use aperture priority if you like.  Normal TTL metering 
will work.  It's an inexpensive way to get high magnification, and you can 
use a few different lenses.  The adapters come in 49mm size as well as 52mm.


With this type of setup, there's no focusing.  You move the camera back and 
forth until the subject is in focus.  You can get slightly different 
magnification depending on whether the lens is set at minimum focus or at 
infinity.  You can get more magnification by adding a filter (UV or 
Skylight, for example) between the lens and the adapter.  The 50mm lens will 
enable full-frame photos of quite small objects, and a 28mm lens will enable 
full-frame photos of really small objects.  By "quite small" and "really 
small" I'm referring to stamp- and coin-sized objects.


One cool thing about it is that you can leave the adapter in your camera bag 
for unexpected macrophoto opportunities.  "What kind of bug is that?"  "Just 
a minute, I'll pop on my reverse adapter and take a picture of it!"


Pat White 





OT: Binary watch

2005-08-28 Thread Pat White
Here's something for digit-heads to amuse and confuse your friends, as well 
as yourselves.


http://www.iwantoneofthose.com/WATBIN.htm

Pat White 





Concert lens length restriction

2005-08-28 Thread Pat White
Last night I went to see David Usher and his band, outdoors at Centennial 
Square, beside City Hall in downtown Victoria, BC, Canada.  As I approached 
the gate, I was asked to open my knapsack, which revealed a small zoom bag 
and a larger lens case.


The security guard wanted to see inside the zoom bag, and, on seeing the 
MZ-S with 28-70 f4, went, "Hmm, looks like pro gear, what's in the big 
case?"  I replied, "A lens.", to which she replied, "You can't use that;  no 
zooms, four-inch limit on lenses.  Four inches, got that?"  "Fine.", I 
replied, thinking it would be dark soon, and the black camera and black 
Sigma 70-200 f2.8 would be less noticeable then.


However, about a third of the way into the show, David Usher, appearing to 
respond to a fan standing in front of the stage, said "Photos? Sure, it's 
okay with me, it's okay with the band.  Flash?  Well, okay, but if we make 
any mistakes because of a flash, it's your fault.", he said, pointing at the 
fan in a friendly way.  Then he said, apparently for the benefit of the 
security, "It's alright, let 'em take pictures, we don't mind."


I happily shot a number of photos (no costume changes and not many lighting 
changes) and enjoyed the music.  The weather was great, around 20C with 
clear skies, and the band hung around for autographs after the show.


Has anyone else heard of a 4-inch limit on length of lenses at a concert? 
It was a first for me.


Pat White





Re: 36mm x 36mm sensor?

2005-08-23 Thread Pat White
What, doesn't everybody want 8x12 or 13.5x20 enlargements?  I used to pay 
extra for them (got some on the wall, looking good), but now I just shoot 
with extra room for cropping.  Much simpler for frames and mats.


Pat White 





Re: Feedback on FA 28-70 F4.0 AL

2005-08-23 Thread Pat White
I have a couple of these lenses.  I bought the first one second-hand, for 
use with studio flash, since it has a constant aperture, making exposures 
very straightforward.  It soon became my daily lens (in preference to the 
28-200 f3.8-5.6), so I bought a second one, new this time, to be sure I'd 
always have one, since the used one was a "high-miler" and the focussing 
ring was a little loose.


The picture quality is pretty good (better than the 28-200), and so is the 
flare resistance, especially considering that it comes without a lenshood. 
There is some barrel distortion, noticeably more than with the 20-35 f4, but 
then it's less than half the price of the 20-35.


Mechanically, the new one works perfectly, and the used one has been fine 
ever since the diaphragm was adjusted at Pentax Canada over four years ago.


It may seem unimportant to many, but the constant aperture feature matters 
to me.  I really don't like it when a lens gets darker as you zoom, and when 
you know the shutter speed will drop if you zoom in.  Maybe I'm 
old-fashioned, but I always associated variable-aperture lenses with 
low-cost varifocal lenses that shifted focus as you zoom.


Pat White 





Re: Strange lens: Miranda AF(!) for MF cameras

2005-08-22 Thread Pat White
Miranda was a Japanese camera brand that was popular in the 60s and early 
70s, but is now out of production.  As explained in the ad, this is a Cosina 
lens with the Miranda name on it, but appears to have no connection with the 
old Miranda brand, in a way similar to the Voightlander-branded Cosina 
cameras that have no connection to the old Voightlander brand.


As for the AF feature, it sounds useful and very unusual.  I've never heard 
of any lens with a complete built-in autofocus system that works with almost 
any manual camera it can be mounted on.  Has anyone heard of another lens 
with a similar set-up?


Pat White 





Re: OT: Some Good Gnus

2005-08-07 Thread Pat White
That's good gnus, Frank!  Congrats!  Riding when you want to is better than 
riding when you have to, and safer, too.


Pat White 





Re: PESO: IoM 2005 TT photo from Parliament Square

2005-08-07 Thread Pat White

Good shot!  That's one of the most-determined looking riders I've ever seen.

Pat White



Re: Pentax 6x7 eyeglass saver

2005-08-07 Thread Pat White
You can buy an actual Pentax eyecup for the 6x7.  It's only $5.99Cdn, and is 
retained by the metal eyepiece ring.  The eyecup is a big rubber item that 
looks the right size for the 6x7.  It protects eyeglasses just fine, but you 
have to be careful when closing the camera back, as the big round eyecup can 
easily get caught by the back.


Pat White 





Re: Final Superbike racing selection

2005-08-04 Thread Pat White
Hi, Mark, did you catch the three Hayden brothers on Jay Leno the other 
night?  Jay showed some trackside video to warm up the audience, then 
brought out the three bros, all wearing jeans and sports jackets.  They 
seemed to come across well, reasonably articulate and very happy to be 
racing for a living.  I think it was great promo for roadracing (circuit 
racing to you European types).


Pat White 





Re: PAW: Dinner with the Family, or: I'm So Booooooooored!

2005-08-02 Thread Pat White
Nice work, Frank!  It has a certain Weegee look to it.  Also, it's easy to 
relate to the "dinner with family" feeling.


Pat White 





Re: what's so special about the pancake?

2005-08-02 Thread Pat White
Well, it's a general-purpose focal length, with a usably bright f-stop, but 
mainly it makes it easier to slip an SLR into a pocket, for everyday 
convenience.


Pat White 





Re: Some Mid-Ohio racing shots on line

2005-07-25 Thread Pat White
Hi, Mark, did you catch Rossi running away from everybody in the rain at 
Donington yesterday?  Sixth win in eight races this year, along with one 
second and one third.  The Doctor really is the master!  Also, one of the 
commentators mentioned that Valentino said (last year, I think) that Sete 
Gibernau would never win a race again.  Since then, Sete has crashed twice 
while leading, and has not won a race.  Odd...


Pat White 





Re: Some Mid-Ohio racing shots on line

2005-07-25 Thread Pat White

Nice shots, Mark!

Pat White



Re: Your Favorite Pentax Camera

2005-07-05 Thread Pat White

Hello, Bruce,

you're right, the question was about your favorite.  Well, the MZ-S is 
definitely my favorite.  It goes almost everywhere with me, and it's a 
pleasure to hold and just look at.  As a "form follows function" sort of 
person, the most useful, most effective, most ergonomic, and just plain 
pleasant to use is my favorite camera.  Any emotional attachment comes after 
that.


Pat White 





Re: Your Favorite Pentax Camera

2005-07-05 Thread Pat White

Shel wrote:

< With a decent lens and a properly functioning camera body, would you 
expect

the results to be any different than with a new Captain Whiz-Bang camera?
All the bells and whistles in the world don't change a thing wrt the light
hitting the film. >

Well, yes and no.  I replaced my cherished MX with an MZ-5 because I'd 
sometimes miss shots when I didn't focus or set the exposure quickly enough. 
The MZ-5n, with its exposure lock and DOF preview, was easier to use, so I 
traded in the MZ-5 after only 3 months with it.


As for the MZ-S, the better metering, better autofocus, greater range of 
shutter speeds, as well as half-speeds, and the ability to use remote 
control allow me to get shots that would be difficult or impossible with the 
other cameras.


In certain circumstances, such as consistent outdoor lighting, patient 
subjects, sufficiently bright lighting, the availability of an assistant 
(instead of a remote release), for example, any quality camera will enable 
you to make a good picture.  However, there are many times when some of the 
"convenience" features become necessities.


With Pentaxes, generally speaking, the features are useful, and not just 
frills.


Pat White 





Re: OT: another survey

2005-07-05 Thread Pat White
Well, although I only drive about 6000km/3700mi a year, and wheel or walk 
almost everywhere, my bachelor "cooking" habits (all microwavable, isn't 
that better than using a big stove?) and penthouse/studio stamp me as a Big 
Consumer.  Maybe I should buy a smaller apartment and get an SUV.  I 
couldn't keep up the payments on 5.7 planets.


CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES

FOOD 3.3
MOBILITY 0.6
SHELTER 3.3
GOODS/SERVICES 3

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 10.2

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.8
GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 5.7
PLANETS.

Pat White




Re: Your Favorite Pentax Camera

2005-07-05 Thread Pat White

Steve Desjardins wrote:

< I notice very few are
mentioning the newer film cameras like the MZ-S.  The old Pentaxes were
compact, sturdy and easy to use, assuming, of course, that you are a
skilled photographer.   >

I would point out that the MZ-S is also compact, sturdy, and easy to use, 
although, as Kostas pointed out, its justifiably high price made it unlikely 
to ever sell as well as the MX (also a favorite) or the Spotmatic.


Pat White






Re: Your Favorite Pentax Camera

2005-07-05 Thread Pat White
Gotta be the MZ-S!  It feels good, looks good, and takes great pictures. 
Although some have mocked the sound of the shutter, to me it has a 
high-precision sound.  Also really like the data imprinting (280 rolls 
through the camera so far).


Pat White 





Re: WAAAAAAAY OT: Wu-Tang Name

2005-05-08 Thread Pat White
Works for me!  I'm Lucky Bandit.
Pat White


Re: OT: Publication!

2005-04-20 Thread Pat White
Good job, Frank!  Hope the recognition brings you more assignments.  CD 
covers are a great way for lots of people to see your work.  The cover 
photos (2 b&w portraits) for Peter Gabriel's Shaking the Tree CD were shot 
by Robert Mapplethorpe, so you're in respected (if unusual) company.

Pat White 




Re: MZ/ZX bodies built-in flash refuse to pop-up?

2005-04-12 Thread Pat White
Nice machining, Alan!  Pity Pentax didn't make it like that...
Pat White


Re: How performs Pentax fisheye zoom 17-28 on *ist DS?

2005-03-31 Thread Pat White
Dave S asked:
Is that the super hero cape or the nurses uniform cape?

Pat responds:  You have super-nurses?  Send me one!!!
(Never seen a nurse in a cape.)
Pat White



Re: Union Pacific Big Boy on the Move

2005-03-21 Thread Pat White
Frank wrote:
I remember now, you used to work for the railway, didn't you?  I guess
you'd know this stuff then...  
That's right, I worked on CN and GO Transit locomotives for twelve years and 
a day (really), before I escaped to work at Ontario Hydro.  Finally, day 
shift with weekends off!

I used to bring my MX and tripod to the diesel shop sometimes.  Wish I had 
somewhere to post the pix.

Pat White



Re: Union Pacific Big Boy on the Move

2005-03-20 Thread Pat White
That's one big locomotive!  And heavy, too, at 1.2 million lbs.  The 
heaviest Diesel locomotive I'm familiar with is the GM SD-40, which weighs 
389,000 lbs when equipped with a V-16 General Motors 645E3 engine (645 cubic 
inches per cylinder, for a total of 10,320 cubic inches, or around 169 
liters, producing 3000hp at 990rpm).  It was also available with a V-20 
engine, but there may be larger, heavier Diesels available now.

All the same, it looks like they'd be dwarfed by the Big Boy.
Pat White 




Re: PESO: Candles in the studio

2005-03-20 Thread Pat White
Nice shots, but something's missing.  Oh yeah, the attractive model... 
Pat White


Re: PESO: The splendour and the misery of Berlin

2005-03-20 Thread Pat White
For me, the placement of the people at the right part of the frame is 
correct;  they appear to feel pity and revulsion for the old woman and are 
trying to pass as far away as possible, almost moving out of the picture, 
although their shadows will pass over her, which is all the interaction 
they're comfortable with.

It would look tidier if they were completely within the frame, but it would 
lose the effective visual and emotional tension that appears to me.  A good 
shot.

Pat White 




Re: OT: Perhaps There Is A God After All

2005-03-16 Thread Pat White
Good news, Frank!  Glad to hear you were able to get things sorted out.  A 
friend from Quebec had planned to visit me this summer with his girlfriend, 
until the Jetsgo fiasco.  He'd booked tickets a month ago, but when he 
contacted Visa, he was told that only gold and platinum card holders could 
get refunds.

When he called the consumer protection agency, he was told, "Tant pis pour 
vous!", roughly, "Too bad for you!"  I'm hoping he'll get it straightened 
out somehow, after all it's been less than a week since Jetsgo went under.

Pat White 




Re: PESO: Djupvasshytta

2005-02-11 Thread Pat White
The item in the bottom center of the picture looks sort of like an inukshuk, 
a stone effigy of a person, used as a marker, among other things, by the 
Inuit of the Canadian North.  Are they used in Norway, too?

See:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inukshuk
Pat White 




Re: OT: Swimming pools,Movie stars

2005-01-21 Thread Pat White
Dave wrote:  Oh well.Might be nice to sit back and enjoy a show for a 
change.LOL

Good attitude.  Seeing an event through the viewfinder often isn't as much 
fun as just seeing it.

Pat White



Re: PAW - Old Jail

2005-01-04 Thread Pat White
Interesting picture, Albano.  It could serve well as a picture of the 
Ministry of Love, in the novel 1984.  Sombre, creepy, and modern, all at 
once.

Pat White 




Re: Talking about frail old ladies

2004-12-18 Thread Pat White
My friend has used his Nikon D100 several times with my Pentax 2P hotshoe 
adapter to trigger my Courtenay studio flashes with no problems.  Of course, 
I have to turn the room lights on so it can see to focus, unlike the MZ-S, 
which does fine with the modeling lights.

Pat White 




Re: OT: Car Enabled

2004-12-16 Thread Pat White
Frank pointed out:
No, no, no, Pat,
You mean,
"Heavy duty cop engine, heavy cop frame, cop brakes, cop oil cooler,
cop sway bars, cop shocks..."
-Joliet Jake
That's right, Frank, you know what I'm talking about!  My previous one, an 
Impala, was even black and white for the first six months or so.

Pat White 




Re: OT: Car Enabled

2004-12-16 Thread Pat White
I miss my ex-police Caprice...  5.7 liter, heavier-guage frame, bigger 
brakes, engine oil cooler, big sway bars front and rear.  A hard car to 
break, and easily good for 350,000km (but you must replace the tranny after 
150,000km of police service).

Pat White 




Re: Help dating a photo

2004-12-16 Thread Pat White
The lady in the photo appears to be wearing pants, or possibly a hobble 
skirt.  Pants on a woman would have been very unusual in 1920.  Also, the 
lady's pose seems odd for the 1920s.  The man's tie may be a straight, 
narrow, hand-knitted one.  Does this help?

Pat White 




Re: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4??

2004-12-14 Thread Pat White
It's old, heavy, bulky, and has a fair bit of pincushion distortion at the 
long end.  Other than that, it's not bad.  I used one for years on my MX, 
and found it to be a handy zoom range.  If its range suits your purposes, 
and you can get a good deal, check it out.

Pat White 



Re: The official PDMLer Christmas shopping list

2004-12-10 Thread Pat White
William wrote:
Oh Man.
What is with the friggin tattoos all of a sudden?
It seems to be trendy with young women.  To me, it's just a case of messing 
up an attractive body, but I can hardly find a model who hasn't "decorated" 
herself.  I really am wishing for a model with no tattoos, I've got all the 
Pentax gear I need.

Pat White 




Re: The official PDMLer Christmas shopping list

2004-12-10 Thread Pat White
A model with no tattoos!
Pat White


Re: Does Pentax Canada Exist?

2004-12-07 Thread Pat White
Yes, they do, at 3131 Universal Drive, in Mississauga.  Did you call them at 
905-625-4930?  I've been there quite a few times (until 2002, anyway.  I 
don't live in Ontario anymore) and always received prompt and friendly 
service.  Hope your problem gets sorted out soon.  The lens is old, but if 
they're no longer servicing it, they should tell you.

Pat White 




Re: MZ-S (a new beginning)

2004-12-06 Thread Pat White
In case my posts in the previous thread got lost, here they are again:
Go for it! The MZ-S is a great camera, and even better with the BG-10 grip. 
Not so sure about the 360 flash, since the head doesn't swivel. I've been 
using a Metz 40MZ-3 flash with my MZ-S, with good success.

The MZ-S focuses well in dim light, better than the D100 or S1 Pro. As for 
noise, it's louder than a practically silent EOS-1V when focusing, but also 
much less expensive. I don't find it too loud, and the focusing is accurate. 
It's easy to switch it from automatically choosing a focus point to using a 
preset focus point. The AF certainly seems accurate enough.

Lens-wise, I've been using almost all F or FA lenses, with the exception of 
an old 500f8 mirror lens, and the in-focus indicator is handy with that one. 
My everyday and short studio lens is the 28-70f4, and it's a handy 
combination with the MZ-S. The 28-70f2.8 is quite a bit bulkier, but should 
work well with it.

As for William's "film is dead" comment, I can't agree. Film and digital 
have two different looks, and I prefer the look of film. Digital appears 
sharp, but has soft detail. Film appears soft, but has clear detail. Neither 
is perfect, nor is anything else in this world. Hope this is helpful.

Part II:
Joe Tainter commented:
The default autofocus mode is multi-point, and it is a contortion to switch 
it to anything else (like central point, like any knowledgeable photographer 
would use). On the D and DS, central point can be set to be the default.

This is not exactly correct. The focus point mode switch, on the right side 
of the lens mount, has 3 positions: Select, Lock, and Auto. There is no 
default. Admittedly, selecting the focus point can be fiddly, but switching 
from Auto to Lock (to use your favorite focus point only (Joe's is the 
central one, mine is the second from the right, since it usually lines up 
nicely with the model's eye)) is simple, for those situations when you 
prefer a fixed focus point.

The AF point mode switch can be left in the Lock position all the time, if 
that's preferred. Hope this helps.

Part III:
As for the drive speed, the spec says 2.5fps, and it seems adequate for most 
kinds of shooting, other than burning through film at sports events.

Pat White 




Re: MZ-S

2004-12-06 Thread Pat White
Joe Tainter commented:
The default autofocus mode is multi-point, and it is a contortion to switch 
it to anything else (like central point, like any knowledgeable photographer 
would use). On the D and DS, central point can be set to be the default.

This is not exactly correct.  The focus point mode switch, on the right side 
of the lens mount, has 3 positions:  Select, Lock, and Auto.  There is no 
default.  Admittedly, selecting the focus point can be fiddly, but switching 
from Auto to Lock (to use your favorite focus point only (Joe's is the 
central one, mine is the second from the right, since it usually lines up 
nicely with the model's eye)) is simple, for those situations when you 
prefer a fixed focus point.

The AF point mode switch can be left in the Lock position all the time, if 
that's preferred.  Hope this helps.

Pat White 




Re: MZ-S

2004-12-06 Thread Pat White
Go for it!  The MZ-S is a great camera, and even better with the BG-10 grip. 
Not so sure about the 360 flash, since the head doesn't swivel.  I've been 
using a Metz 40MZ-3 flash with my MZ-S, with good success.

The MZ-S focuses well in dim light, better than the D100 or S1 Pro.  As for 
noise, it's louder than a practically silent EOS-1V when focusing, but also 
much less expensive.  I don't find it too loud, and the focusing is 
accurate.  It's easy to switch it from automatically choosing a focus point 
to using a preset focus point.  The AF certainly seems accurate enough.

Lens-wise, I've been using almost all F or FA lenses, with the exception of 
an old 500f8 mirror lens, and the in-focus indicator is handy with that one. 
My everyday and short studio lens is the 28-70f4, and it's a handy 
combination with the MZ-S.  The 28-70f2.8 is quite a bit bulkier, but should 
work well with it.

As for William's "film is dead" comment, I can't agree.  Film and digital 
have two different looks, and I prefer the look of film.  Digital appears 
sharp, but has soft detail.  Film appears soft, but has clear detail. 
Neither is perfect, nor is anything else in this world.  Hope this is 
helpful.

Pat White 




Re: MZ-S - new to me

2004-12-06 Thread Pat White
Congratulations on your choice of the Pentax MZ-S!  It's a very enjoyable 
camera to use, with a high-quality feel to it.  If you get the BG-10 grip, 
it's even better.  The infra-red remote is handier than you might think, 
enabling self-portraits from as far away as 15-20 feet, and a good 
substitute for a cable release.

You're right about the minimal vibration.  I've been able to get sharp 
pictures, hand-held, at surprisingly slow speeds.

The data imprinting feature is really appreciated, especially when doing a 
series of test shots.  As for the film counter, I'm happy to say I just shot 
roll 253, and the camera works as well as the day I bought it.  At 27 rolls, 
yours is nearly new.  Happy shooting!

Pat White 




Re: Really OT: More on spy/adware problems

2004-12-04 Thread Pat White
While on the topic of malware, I should mention a file that caused me a lots 
of aggravation and wasted time:  something called noupdate.exe.  It 
prevented Norton and Windows from doing any updates, and would stop Norton 
scans as soon as they started.  I'm really glad I was able to get rid of it.

Pat White 




Re: Really OT: More on spy/adware problems

2004-12-04 Thread Pat White
Dave, you're lucky you have XP.  I run XP, Norton Antivirus, and I'm 
connected to the Net through a DSL router.  Even so, my computer was 
attacked in July.  58 files came through in 2 minutes, many of them multiple 
copies of viruses and worms.  My address book was blank, IE Favorites nearly 
all disappeared, and the hundreds of messages in my Inbox and Sent Items 
were gone.

Ad-Aware was able to get rid of the worms and viruses, but it took System 
Restore to bring back my missing info.  It made my day to see it all 
restored.  The next day, another attack put 21 files on my hard drive. 
Norton AV got rid of most of them, but couldn't delete 8 of them.  When I 
installed Ad-Aware SE a couple of weeks ago, I was finally able to get rid 
of them.

Last week, after seeing postings about Spybot S&D on the pdml, I installed 
that.  It found and eliminated a few more problems that Ad-Aware and Norton 
Antivirus had been unable to see.  For the first time in months, I think my 
machine is clear of unwanted files.

As for pop-ups, XP Service Pack 2 (installed a month ago) seems to keep 
nearly all of them out.

Try System Restore and go from there.  Good luck, Dave!
Pat White 




Re: they must not have built very many

2004-11-16 Thread Pat White
I just checked the Pentax Canada website and was boggled to find the MZ-S 
and MZ-5n on the list of discontinued products!  That has to be one of the 
shortest production runs for a top-line Pentax slr.  Sad news.

Pat White 




RE: PAW: Clear at the Can

2004-11-11 Thread Pat White
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes!  Looks like it's got none. 
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.

Pat White 




OT - for catlovers &/or Led Zep fans

2004-11-11 Thread Pat White
Excellent!  Finally I see the song's true meaning.Thanks.
Pat White


Re: greetings

2004-11-07 Thread Pat White
I don't speak or read Czech, but I'm guessing the last part of Frantisek's 
posting is something to the effect of "political discussions are nasty and 
not needed".  Sounds about right.

Anyway, welcome to the list, Michal.  Take pictures of everything.  When you 
find the subject you love, the one that inspires you, you'll start to make 
your best pictures.

Pat White 




Naked in the House

2004-10-29 Thread Pat White
Was Dave Brooks the only one besides me who saw the item about the Naked in 
the House competition?  12 photographers, each with only one camera, one 
lens, one roll of film, and only 30 minutes with the model to produce a 
winning photo.

More info at: http://www.pulse24.com/Showbiz/Top_Story/20041022-002/page.asp
Warning:  heavy pixellation of naughty bits!
Also see:  http://www.nakedinthehouse.com/
Warning:  Some actual female nudity.  You've been warned.
Pat White



Re: OT:Longest Hair, late entry

2004-10-29 Thread Pat White
Thanks, Ann.  I finally got tired of grooming it and cut my hair short in 
1982, after I'd been shooting with my MX for 2 years (Pentax content).

Pat White 




Re: OT:Longest Hair, late entry

2004-10-29 Thread Pat White
Thanks for posting the pictures, Dario!  Now I'm wondering, what did you 
look like in the 70s?

Pat White 




Medium Format still Rules! Update

2004-10-28 Thread Pat White
Just checked the Web, and there were 12 photogs in the Naked in the House 
event.  Rules are one camera, one lens, one roll of film, and 30 minutes 
with the model.

More info at: 
http://www.pulse24.com/Showbiz/Top_Story/20041022-002/page.asp

Warning:  heavy pixellation of naughty bits!
Also see:  http://www.nakedinthehouse.com/
Warning:  Some actual female nudity.  You've been warned.
Pat White 




Medium Format still rules! (in some circles)

2004-10-28 Thread Pat White
Last week I was watching Fashion Television (they often do segments on 
fashion and art photographers), and saw a bit on the 4th annual Naked in the 
House competition.  It's a location shoot, with only 10 photographers 
entered (most, if not all, are pros), with a large entry fee.  They get to 
see pictures of the location before the shoot, but not the actual site. 
They're restricted to one camera and one lens, and have only 30 minutes with 
the model to produce a winning nude photo.

Previous locations have been Victorian mansions in Toronto, but this year's 
event was held at a waterfront estate somewhere north of Toronto.

A couple of months later, the top photos (16x20 B&W) are shown at a gala 
evening and sold.

To get to the point, _all_ the photographers used medium format cameras, 
mostly 6x7s, although one used a Hasselblad.  Not a digital in sight.

Pat White 




Re: OT:Longest Hair, late entry

2004-10-28 Thread Pat White
So, Paul, looks like you were/are a Twisted Sister fan.  Back in the late 
70s, my hair reached down to about six inches above my belt.  If I was 
driving in short sleeves and got chilly, I could cover my elbows.  I'd post 
a picture, but I've got no website.

Pat White 




Re: The Pentax lens you can't afford!

2004-10-21 Thread Pat White
Don't know about Pentax telescopes, but Pentax telescope eyepieces are 
considered among the best you can buy.  They're SMC coated and cost around 
$350usd apiece.

Pat White 




Re: One Last Film Body Survey

2004-10-20 Thread Pat White
Sylwester wrote:  For me it would be just enough to tweak MZ-S with rubber 
enviromental seals,
bigger viewfinder (95%, 0.9x) and metal back...

That would make a great camera even better.
Then Jack wrote:  Please, also, add motor drive (4fps OK), well dampened 
shutter, auto bracketing and infrared activated self timer, usable from 
either the front or back of the camera.

The MZ-S already has three of those four things.  Twenty-five years ago, the 
LX was a great camera, but better cameras have been made since then.  Would 
you want a brand-new 1980 Mercedes or Corvette (never mind the collector 
value)?

Pat White



Re: MZ-S discontinued?

2004-10-20 Thread Pat White
No more top-of-the-line film cameras?  How about the new N***n F6?  Also, I 
believe C***n's still happily producing the EOS-1V.

Pat White 




Re: OT: Happy Canadian Thanksgiving

2004-10-11 Thread Pat White
Happy Thanksgiving, Frank!  I thought I'd be spending the day alone, but got 
a last-minute call to use my van to move an electric organ, and dinner was 
thrown in.  After a great early dinner, I noticed the house had great views, 
so I took a few pictures.  Then, as I was leaving, there were three deer in 
the driveway, having their dinner of barley that the host had put out for 
them.  Yeah, we have suburban deer here!  Took some more pictures, of 
course.

Pat White 




Re: Hockey World Cup

2004-09-14 Thread Pat White
Don't be too sad, Henri.  The Finns played a great game.  Ruutu was poetry
in motion.  It was one of the best hockey games I've ever seen, with both
teams trying hard, no fighting (call me a wuss, I don't care), and only 2
penalties.  Your team proved it belonged ahead of all the other contenders,
except Canada, of course.

Pat White




Hockey World Cup

2004-09-14 Thread Pat White
CANADA WINS!!!

Pat White



Re: The Knarf look ;-)

2004-09-12 Thread Pat White
Frank, your work has a "look"!  Congrats!  

Pat White



Re: 426 Posts in 24 Hours

2004-09-08 Thread Pat White
Pat, there's a nomail option.  Then you don't get any messages, you just
look at the list, read what you want, and respond when something interests
you.  The downside is that you only see the archive, which sometimes takes
hours, or even longer, to update, meaning your comments may appear late in
any discussion.

Pat White




Re: Tan's new assets...

2004-09-08 Thread Pat White
Glad to hear your procedure went well, and thanks for sharing your photos.
You seem to have chosen a very appropriate size for your frame.  I hope
everything heals perfectly.  Also, I respect your courage/forthrightness.

Pat White




*istD: to wait or not to wait that is the question

2004-09-03 Thread Pat White
My two cents worth?  Go for it!  You'll have peace of mind on your
assignment, and the second body will have a chance to earn some money for
you, probably more than compensating for any "maybe, perhaps" discount
months from now.

Pat White




Re: The meaning of letters in lens names?

2004-09-01 Thread Pat White
When the M lenses were introduced, the "M" represented "miniature", since
they were more compact than the K bayonet-mount lenses, and intended to be a
more suitable match for the new MX and ME cameras, which were smaller than
the "K" cameras.

Pat White




Re: 50th Anniv Ltd Ed. *ist D pics

2004-09-01 Thread Pat White
Well, that camera looks kinda cool!  I wonder how many years Pentax has been
in Canada, and will we ever see an *ist-D with a maple leaf on it?

Pat White




Re: OT: Photographic double-entendre

2004-09-01 Thread Pat White
Use it in a sentence:  I Leica nipple, or even a pair, will someone jump in,
and say "Don't you go there!"?

Pat White




Re: advertising (was Seen on dpreview)

2004-09-01 Thread Pat White
Bob said:

you seem to have a bottomless well of complete bollocks to draw from,
Collin!

Beautifully and concisely stated, Bob!

Pat White




Re: Books/Sites on 67II

2004-08-29 Thread Pat White
To see examples of pictures shot with the P67, check out magazines like
American Photo.  This month's issue has a picture of Janet Jackson (one of
the 4 covers, the one where she's reclining on a white sofa, it's also
inside the magazine) shot with a 67.  The camera is very popular with
fashion shooters, along with the Mamiya RZ67.

Bruce Weber uses 20 (!) P67s, 5 every day on a shoot.  There was an article
in the English magazine Practical Photography about his shoot for the
Pirelli calendar last year.  6 days, 12,000 pictures, crew of 49.

Pat White




Re: I enjoy film

2004-08-25 Thread Pat White
Many folks seem to have had bad luck with their film processing.  In over 25
years of shooting with an SLR (Pentax since 1980), I don't think I've had
more than 1% of my pictures messed up by a lab.  I've found labs that gave
consistently bad results (greenish color cast at one, dust spots at
another), so I stopped using those ones.  For many years, I used Qalex for
my everyday 4x6s, then last year I kept getting unuseably contrasty prints.

Now I use London Drugs (only found in western Canada) for my everyday pix,
and I'm fairly pleased nearly all the time.  They print on Fuji Crystal
Archive, and the prints are ready within hours.  For enlargements, the local
pro labs give good results, and aren't that expensive.

Some of my photographically casual friends ask why I don't use Wal-Mart or
Costco for processing, since it's cheaper.  They seem to find the quality
acceptable.  Perhaps they actually are the voice of the masses.  Sometimes
they can see the difference when I point it out, but often they don't care.
So many people just want to see a tiny image on the LCD screen of their
digicam, or just email their happy snaps to their friends.  They don't seem
to care about prints anymore.  That may be the real cause for the decline in
film use.

All the same, there's usually a line-up at London Drugs, and I sometimes see
folks bringing in half-a-dozen or more 35mm films at a time.  At least here
in Victoria, film is still alive and well.

My 2001 MZ-S, my constant companion, is loaded with 2004 film, and in 2010,
when today's digital wonders are considered laughably obsolete, I'll be
using it with the amazing new 2010 films.  Am I in denial, living in a dream
world?  I sure hope not!

Pat White




  1   2   3   4   5   >