Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
Hell, Frank, rant away. I suspect there is a lot of truth in what you say. If the seats are packed in tight, I could also imagine that trying to shoot with a really long lens could be annoying to those around him/her. Especially once they've set up the tripod ;-) On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: You're right. 300mm is quite liberal, reasonable and permissive. Upon reconsideration my previous post was over reacting and just plain wrong. I would withdraw that post were it possible to do so, but since I can't, please accept my apologies for having posted it. Cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
From: Bob W The entire games are a giant corporate stitch-up, so this sort of thing comes as no surprise. I'd rather see a scaled-down games with less corporate sponsorship and 'hospitality' and something on a more human scale geared towards ordinary people, even if it wasn't so spectacular. B Ain't never going to happen again in this lifetime. If you want to see Olympics that's actually about the athletes, invent a time machine and go back to ancient Greece. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
You forgot the other prohibition - large cameras. You can take your 300/2.8 in, but not the camera body it's mounted on. From: John Francis Only lenses over 30cm prohibited? That's quite permissive by today's standards. for the US Figure Skating championships the limit was below that; I think the 50-135 might just have been allowed, but the 60-250 definitely wasn't. But with a 30cm guideline the A* 300/2.8 (even with the 1.7x AF adapter) falls within the length limits. As does an A 400/5.6 (but not an A*/2.8). I wouldn't want to be shooting anything much larger than that hand-held. The rules are at least partially there to prevent you being a dick and blocking the view of the person in the seat next to you by sticking a honking great camera right in their field of view. If I were going to the Olympics I'd be giving serious consideration to an OM-D with the 75-300 - that's a whole lot easier to carry around. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
It wasn't about the athletes even then. What annoys me about the Olympics is not the commercialism but the whiff of idealism it still tries to cloak itself in. In my opinion, anything that calls itself a movement has more in common with what the medical establishment calls a movement than anything else. On 6/7/2012 11:51 AM, John Sessoms wrote: From: Bob W The entire games are a giant corporate stitch-up, so this sort of thing comes as no surprise. I'd rather see a scaled-down games with less corporate sponsorship and 'hospitality' and something on a more human scale geared towards ordinary people, even if it wasn't so spectacular. B Ain't never going to happen again in this lifetime. If you want to see Olympics that's actually about the athletes, invent a time machine and go back to ancient Greece. -- Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a lengthily search. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
Apparently large cameras, (and I don't know what large means Pop Photo doesn't give specifics), and lenses over 30 cm, (why don't the English just revert to form and say a foot), are prohibited. I expect to see a run on Pentax M* 300mm and Olympus OM-D cameras with 4:3 to K mount adapters is in the offing. Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a lengthily search. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
The entire games are a giant corporate stitch-up, so this sort of thing comes as no surprise. I'd rather see a scaled-down games with less corporate sponsorship and 'hospitality' and something on a more human scale geared towards ordinary people, even if it wasn't so spectacular. B -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling Sent: 06 June 2012 18:28 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. Apparently large cameras, (and I don't know what large means Pop Photo doesn't give specifics), and lenses over 30 cm, (why don't the English just revert to form and say a foot), are prohibited. I expect to see a run on Pentax M* 300mm and Olympus OM-D cameras with 4:3 to K mount adapters is in the offing. Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a lengthily search. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
These sorts of things really piss me off. The IOC and the local organizers are so f-ing worried that someone is going to sell a photo and they'll lose licensing fees or royalties or whatever that no one gets to take keepsakes. I was at the Olympics in Montreal in 76. Took my Praktica and either a 200 or 300mm to my one day at the stadium. Happened to be the day that Lasse Viren won his second race making him the only Olympian to win the 5,000m and 10,000m in successive Olympics. Got a shot of him crossing the line then another of him collapsing on the track. It was also day two of the decathlon. Got several shots of Bruce Jenner including one of him taking a victory lap waving an American flag. From where I was my shots had no commercial value; indeed they would have no value to anyone but me. All they did is show I was there. That's what any photo from the seats will be. No one except those with credentials will be anywhere near any vantage point from which they can take commercially viable images. What the hell are they afraid of? They won't lose a dime if they let amateurs shoot with big lenses from their seats. They're just bring control freaks. Cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Bob W p...@web-options.com Sent: June 6, 2012 6/6/12 To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net Subject: RE: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. The entire games are a giant corporate stitch-up, so this sort of thing comes as no surprise. I'd rather see a scaled-down games with less corporate sponsorship and 'hospitality' and something on a more human scale geared towards ordinary people, even if it wasn't so spectacular. B -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling Sent: 06 June 2012 18:28 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. Apparently large cameras, (and I don't know what large means Pop Photo doesn't give specifics), and lenses over 30 cm, (why don't the English just revert to form and say a foot), are prohibited. I expect to see a run on Pentax M* 300mm and Olympus OM-D cameras with 4:3 to K mount adapters is in the offing. Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a lengthily search. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
On 06/06/2012 8:49 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: These sorts of things really piss me off. Take along a Q and a 135... The rules seem pretty stupid, but I can just imagine scrums of wannabe pros making life miserable for all involved. Sometimes it's best to just sit back and enjoy the show. We don't have to photograph everything that we see. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
We don't have to photograph everything that we see. Now there is a MARK worthy quote if ever I saw one. DS On 07/06/2012, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/06/2012 8:49 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: These sorts of things really piss me off. Take along a Q and a 135... The rules seem pretty stupid, but I can just imagine scrums of wannabe pros making life miserable for all involved. Sometimes it's best to just sit back and enjoy the show. We don't have to photograph everything that we see. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
And yet it seems that is exactly what some members of the PDML do. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. We don't have to photograph everything that we see. Now there is a MARK worthy quote if ever I saw one. DS On 07/06/2012, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/06/2012 8:49 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: These sorts of things really piss me off. Take along a Q and a 135... The rules seem pretty stupid, but I can just imagine scrums of wannabe pros making life miserable for all involved. Sometimes it's best to just sit back and enjoy the show. We don't have to photograph everything that we see. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
Only when I have my camera with me. Cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: kwal...@peoplepc.com Sent: June 7, 2012 6/7/12 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. And yet it seems that is exactly what some members of the PDML do. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. We don't have to photograph everything that we see. Now there is a MARK worthy quote if ever I saw one. DS On 07/06/2012, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/06/2012 8:49 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: These sorts of things really piss me off. Take along a Q and a 135... The rules seem pretty stupid, but I can just imagine scrums of wannabe pros making life miserable for all involved. Sometimes it's best to just sit back and enjoy the show. We don't have to photograph everything that we see. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
Only lenses over 30cm prohibited? That's quite permissive by today's standards. for the US Figure Skating championships the limit was below that; I think the 50-135 might just have been allowed, but the 60-250 definitely wasn't. But with a 30cm guideline the A* 300/2.8 (even with the 1.7x AF adapter) falls within the length limits. As does an A 400/5.6 (but not an A*/2.8). I wouldn't want to be shooting anything much larger than that hand-held. The rules are at least partially there to prevent you being a dick and blocking the view of the person in the seat next to you by sticking a honking great camera right in their field of view. If I were going to the Olympics I'd be giving serious consideration to an OM-D with the 75-300 - that's a whole lot easier to carry around. On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:49:36AM +, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: These sorts of things really piss me off. The IOC and the local organizers are so f-ing worried that someone is going to sell a photo and they'll lose licensing fees or royalties or whatever that no one gets to take keepsakes. I was at the Olympics in Montreal in 76. Took my Praktica and either a 200 or 300mm to my one day at the stadium. Happened to be the day that Lasse Viren won his second race making him the only Olympian to win the 5,000m and 10,000m in successive Olympics. Got a shot of him crossing the line then another of him collapsing on the track. It was also day two of the decathlon. Got several shots of Bruce Jenner including one of him taking a victory lap waving an American flag. From where I was my shots had no commercial value; indeed they would have no value to anyone but me. All they did is show I was there. That's what any photo from the seats will be. No one except those with credentials will be anywhere near any vantage point from which they can take commercially viable images. What the hell are they afraid of? They won't lose a dime if they let amateurs shoot with big lenses from their seats. They're just bring control freaks. Cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Bob W p...@web-options.com Sent: June 6, 2012 6/6/12 To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net Subject: RE: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. The entire games are a giant corporate stitch-up, so this sort of thing comes as no surprise. I'd rather see a scaled-down games with less corporate sponsorship and 'hospitality' and something on a more human scale geared towards ordinary people, even if it wasn't so spectacular. B -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling Sent: 06 June 2012 18:28 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. Apparently large cameras, (and I don't know what large means Pop Photo doesn't give specifics), and lenses over 30 cm, (why don't the English just revert to form and say a foot), are prohibited. I expect to see a run on Pentax M* 300mm and Olympus OM-D cameras with 4:3 to K mount adapters is in the offing. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size.
You're right. 300mm is quite liberal, reasonable and permissive. Upon reconsideration my previous post was over reacting and just plain wrong. I would withdraw that post were it possible to do so, but since I can't, please accept my apologies for having posted it. Cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: John Francis jo...@panix.com Sent: June 7, 2012 6/7/12 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. Only lenses over 30cm prohibited? That's quite permissive by today's standards. for the US Figure Skating championships the limit was below that; I think the 50-135 might just have been allowed, but the 60-250 definitely wasn't. But with a 30cm guideline the A* 300/2.8 (even with the 1.7x AF adapter) falls within the length limits. As does an A 400/5.6 (but not an A*/2.8). I wouldn't want to be shooting anything much larger than that hand-held. The rules are at least partially there to prevent you being a dick and blocking the view of the person in the seat next to you by sticking a honking great camera right in their field of view. If I were going to the Olympics I'd be giving serious consideration to an OM-D with the 75-300 - that's a whole lot easier to carry around. On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:49:36AM +, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: These sorts of things really piss me off. The IOC and the local organizers are so f-ing worried that someone is going to sell a photo and they'll lose licensing fees or royalties or whatever that no one gets to take keepsakes. I was at the Olympics in Montreal in 76. Took my Praktica and either a 200 or 300mm to my one day at the stadium. Happened to be the day that Lasse Viren won his second race making him the only Olympian to win the 5,000m and 10,000m in successive Olympics. Got a shot of him crossing the line then another of him collapsing on the track. It was also day two of the decathlon. Got several shots of Bruce Jenner including one of him taking a victory lap waving an American flag. From where I was my shots had no commercial value; indeed they would have no value to anyone but me. All they did is show I was there. That's what any photo from the seats will be. No one except those with credentials will be anywhere near any vantage point from which they can take commercially viable images. What the hell are they afraid of? They won't lose a dime if they let amateurs shoot with big lenses from their seats. They're just bring control freaks. Cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Bob W p...@web-options.com Sent: June 6, 2012 6/6/12 To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net Subject: RE: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. The entire games are a giant corporate stitch-up, so this sort of thing comes as no surprise. I'd rather see a scaled-down games with less corporate sponsorship and 'hospitality' and something on a more human scale geared towards ordinary people, even if it wasn't so spectacular. B -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling Sent: 06 June 2012 18:28 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Olympics sets limits on amature lens size. Apparently large cameras, (and I don't know what large means Pop Photo doesn't give specifics), and lenses over 30 cm, (why don't the English just revert to form and say a foot), are prohibited. I expect to see a run on Pentax M* 300mm and Olympus OM-D cameras with 4:3 to K mount adapters is in the offing. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Amature
In a message dated 12/13/2005 10:08:42 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/ Some outstanding photos, Sunny, -- moody with good compositions -- in various moods. Actually, I was a bit amazed at the variety of the shots. (Although a gallery presentation where I could use a next button/arrow would be nice.) You definitely have talent. Please continue to hang around the list. Marnie aka Doe :-)
Re: Amature
Hi! Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/ Great stuff!!! Some really good photography... So it does not really matter which term you apply to yourself... It really does not matter... Boris
Re: Amature
Hi Sunny, Nice and beatiful photography. Thanks for sharing. Ronald Sunny Chung wrote: Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/
Re: Amature
Hi Sunny, Welcome to the Pentax forum. I enjoyed our portfolio. Some very good work. You have an excellent eye. Paul On Dec 14, 2005, at 1:07 AM, Sunny Chung wrote: Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/
RE: Amature
Some beautiful work Sunny. You've proven once again that it's more the eye behind the lens than the lens itself that counts. Don -Original Message- From: Sunny Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:07 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Amature Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/
Re: Amature
Sonny, lovely stuff! You've made some wonderful images there. About the lens, I know everyone raves about the 50/1.4 primes (with reason), but I got the FA 50mm/1.7 for two reasons: it weighs two ounces less than the 1.4 (minimizing weight is important to me), and I only paid about $90 for a near mint lens on ebay, about 9 months ago. Keep posting pictures, thanks! *UncaMikey
RE: Amature
Very good portefoleo. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Sunny Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14. desember 2005 07:07 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Amature Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/
Re: Amature
Sunny Chung wrote: Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/ Beautiful photos Sunny. I particularly like the pan job you did on Caught in Motion. I'm useless at panning. FYI, I bought an A50 f/1.4 just recently, and love it. if I could have found an FA, I would have bought it. Mind you, after using the kit lens and a cheap Tamron zoom, I thought I was just bad at manual focus (blamed it on my eyes), but it turns out that I *can* manually focus reasonably well, as long as it's with a bright lens. For instance, I'm not sure that the effect I got on this shot is successful, but I did manage to focus on approximately what I wanted: http://forksandhope.com/Africa/IMGP5294-Kilimanjaro-Protea.jpg If you're short on cash, you might consider an A50 f1.7 or f/2.0, which aren't that hard to be had on ebay or keh, and are of very high quality. jp -- Jon Paul Schelter http://forksandhope.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] This isn't right, it isn't even wrong.
Amature
Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/
RE: Amature
Hi Sunny, I like your style! There are a lot of shots I see there that are unusually composed, yet beautiful, even of subjects I would not normally like. Thanks for showing them. It makes me think. Tom C. From: Sunny Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Amature Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:07:22 -0500 Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college student :-(. So after all your advice, I definately want the 50/1.4 FA lens... but don't have $200 to spend right now. The only lens I have right now is the kit lens that came with my ist DL, which isn't bad. Once again, thank you for all your responses. If you care to look at my amature photography, I've posted my best pictures so far at: http://dapjang.deviantart.com/gallery/
