RE: PESO: Field Sparrow
John wrote: > And what's wrong with cat photos? :) > > Cheers, Dave > Nothing really. Unless you want to photograph birds - cats ain't birds. For John & Dave; a regular bird stalker here: http://flic.kr/p/MRdvah Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
On 10/17/2016 12:42 AM, David Mann wrote: On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote: I 'll have to be more patient. We also have a very high cat population wandering about; I've got better pictures of them stalking pigeons in the garden than I have of the birds themselves! And what's wrong with cat photos? :) Cheers, Dave Nothing really. Unless you want to photograph birds - cats ain't birds. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote: > I 'll have to be more patient. We also have a very high cat population > wandering about; I've got better pictures of them stalking pigeons in the > garden than I have of the birds themselves! And what's wrong with cat photos? :) Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: PESO: Field Sparrow
Paul Stenquist wrote: Thanks Malcolm. One key to getting bird pics is that the photographer stay still long enough that the birds become accustomed to seeing you. I 'll have to be more patient. We also have a very high cat population wandering about; I've got better pictures of them stalking pigeons in the garden than I have of the birds themselves! Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
and he nailed the species too! ann On 10/16/2016 12:11 AM, Larry Colen wrote: Very nice. You make getting good photographs of birds seem easy, or at least possible. On October 15, 2016 4:56:34 PM MST, Paul Stenquist wrote: I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground once hr thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
Thanks Malcolm. One key to getting bird pics is that the photographer stay still long enough that the birds become accustomed to seeing you. Paul via phone > On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:28 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote: > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible > that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around > in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem > interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground once hr > thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg > > K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. > > That's a really strong image. I have had real difficulty getting these shots, > as my subjects will not stay still long enough. > > Malcolm > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: PESO: Field Sparrow
Paul Stenquist wrote: I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground once hr thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. That's a really strong image. I have had real difficulty getting these shots, as my subjects will not stay still long enough. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
Very nice. You make getting good photographs of birds seem easy, or at least possible. On October 15, 2016 4:56:34 PM MST, Paul Stenquist wrote: >I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely >possible that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they >thrash around in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. >He didn’t seem interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty >on the ground once hr thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep >an eye out. > >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg > >K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO >6400. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse any swypos. http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
Thanks Dan. Great Pentax glass. Paul via phone > On Oct 15, 2016, at 11:17 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > > Nice clear shot and great depth of field control -- the bird really stand > out well from the background. > > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible >> that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash >> around in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t >> seem interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground >> once hr thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg >> >> K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
Nice clear shot and great depth of field control -- the bird really stand out well from the background. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible > that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash > around in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t > seem interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground > once hr thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg > > K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Field Sparrow
Couple of sharp cuties, Paul! Well done! J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 15, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible > that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around > in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem > interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground once hr > thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg > > K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO: Field Sparrow
I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around in the brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem interested in my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground once hr thinks it’s safe. Don’t know. I’ll have to keep an eye out. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18299789&size=lg K-1, D FA 150-450 plus DA 1.4 X converter, 630 mm, f8, 1/640th, ISO 6400. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Field of Flowers - Take 2
Good feedback, thanks. -- Bruce Monday, April 9, 2007, 7:28:21 AM, you wrote: C> Bruce Dayton wrote: >> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different >> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you >> think this one works better or worse than the previous one. >> >> Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld >> ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4689.htm >> C> nicely composed. C> -- C> Christian C> http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of Flowers - Take 2
In a message dated 4/8/2007 11:44:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you think this one works better or worse than the previous one. Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4689.htm -- Bruce == The first was better. This one suffers from lack of DOF and what appears to be drops on the lens in front (at the bottom, making me feel it might have been taken in the rain). And, yes, I know I showed a photo I really liked with shallow DOF in front and only focused in the middle. (But that only one other really liked, everyone else was more bothered by the shallow DOF in front.) But, for my liking, that was a mass of flowers -- when one can see and make out individual flowers, I feel it is different. In other words, my inconsistency has a basis. :-) Of some sort. Marnie aka Doe ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of Flowers - Take 2
Bruce Dayton wrote: > Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different > location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you > think this one works better or worse than the previous one. > > Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld > ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4689.htm > nicely composed. -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of Flowers - Take 2
Better. But still needs more DOF. This is one of those shots where you have to bite the bullet and pull out the tripod. Paul On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different > location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you > think this one works better or worse than the previous one. > > Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld > ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4689.htm > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of Flowers - Take 2
On Apr 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different > location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you > think this one works better or worse than the previous one. > > Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld > ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4689.htm I like this one more than the previous shot. The zone of focus is nearly to the foreground edge, which helps. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO - Field of Flowers - Take 2
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you think this one works better or worse than the previous one. Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4689.htm -- Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Thanks for your comments. I tend to agree with you. I think that is why it works for me too. -- Bruce Monday, April 2, 2007, 10:06:31 AM, you wrote: SB> Hi Bruce, SB> I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it seems a step or two removed from SB> the more typical bird closeup - putting the little winged creature into a SB> larger context than just a closeup on a branch seems to get me more SB> "involved" with the scene, somewhat akin to having been there as opposed to SB> just looking at a pic that should be in a book about bird identification. SB> The second (tighter cropped) version works best for me. SB> Shel >> [Original Message] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. >> This shot evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's >> suggestion and tried a crop: >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm >> >> Original: >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Bruce, I agree with Jens and Jack. Rick --- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it needs an anchor of some sort. Just too > homogeneous with no > direction for the eye. > As composed, I feel the foreground should be in > focus. > > Jack > --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I > would appreciate > > your opinions on it. > > > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > > > -- > > Bruce > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time > with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
This was supposed to be about your bird pic, not the field pic, which I've net yet looked at. I think the posting error is all Marnie's fault. Bad Girl! Marnie Shel > [Original Message] > From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Bruce, > > I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it seems a step or two removed from > the more typical bird closeup - putting the little winged creature into a > larger context than just a closeup on a branch seems to get me more > "involved" with the scene, somewhat akin to having been there as opposed to > just looking at a pic that should be in a book about bird identification. > The second (tighter cropped) version works best for me. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. > > This shot evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's > > suggestion and tried a crop: > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm > > > > Original: > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Much better, IMO. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Field > Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot > evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion and tried a > crop: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm > > Original: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > > I think with Ken's suggestion, I am happier with this shot. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Saturday, March 31, 2007, 5:26:09 PM, you wrote: > > KW> I like it. > > KW> I would probably crop out the less populated portions in the URH & LRH > KW> corners > > KW> Kenneth Waller > > KW> - Original Message - > KW> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > KW> Subject: PESO - Field > > >>> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate >>> your opinions on it. >>> >>> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld >>> ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 >>> >>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm >>> >>> -- >>> Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Hi Bruce, I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it seems a step or two removed from the more typical bird closeup - putting the little winged creature into a larger context than just a closeup on a branch seems to get me more "involved" with the scene, somewhat akin to having been there as opposed to just looking at a pic that should be in a book about bird identification. The second (tighter cropped) version works best for me. Shel > [Original Message] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. > This shot evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's > suggestion and tried a crop: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm > > Original: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
In a message dated 4/1/2007 9:22:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion and tried a crop: http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm Original: http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm I think with Ken's suggestion, I am happier with this shot. -- Best regards, Bruce Much better. Marnie aka Doe ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
I have to concur... One of the things that still keeps eluding me is a shot such as this one. Ken's suggestion was right on the money. Cheers. Boris On 4/2/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot > evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion and tried a > crop: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm > > Original: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > > I think with Ken's suggestion, I am happier with this shot. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Saturday, March 31, 2007, 5:26:09 PM, you wrote: > > KW> I like it. > > KW> I would probably crop out the less populated portions in the URH & LRH > KW> corners > > KW> Kenneth Waller > > KW> - Original Message - > KW> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > KW> Subject: PESO - Field > > > >> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > >> your opinions on it. > >> > >> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > >> ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > >> > >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > >> > >> -- > >> Bruce > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion and tried a crop: http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm Original: http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm I think with Ken's suggestion, I am happier with this shot. -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, March 31, 2007, 5:26:09 PM, you wrote: KW> I like it. KW> I would probably crop out the less populated portions in the URH & LRH KW> corners KW> Kenneth Waller KW> - Original Message - KW> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KW> Subject: PESO - Field >> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate >> your opinions on it. >> >> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld >> ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm >> >> -- >> Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
I like it. I would probably crop out the less populated portions in the URH & LRH corners Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PESO - Field > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > your opinions on it. > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > -- > Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:46:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate your opinions on it. Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm -- Bruce = It's okay, but something seems a bit off to me. Not totally sure what, maybe the triangular sort of blankish space near the right bottom. I think it would have more pow if flowers went to the frame. Just my .02. Marnie aka Doe :-) ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
On Mar 31, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > your opinions on it. > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm Doesn't do much for me, Bruce. I don't like the out-in-out focus effect and the scene does not draw my eye in at all, it's just there. I guess it's too literal.. G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Exactly what i was thinking. I like the single out of place flower. Dave On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the soft blur in the foreground that takes your view to the sharp > center, and then falls off to a blur in the background. > > Jim A. > > > > > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > > your opinions on it. > > > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > > > -- > > Bruce > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
I think it needs an anchor of some sort. Just too homogeneous with no direction for the eye. As composed, I feel the foreground should be in focus. Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > your opinions on it. > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: PESO - Field
Very nice. But as to the DOF it seems you are sitting between two chairs. The DOF is either too shallow (to get all flowers sharp) or to wide in order to use the DOF for isolating / emphasising some of the flowers. Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bruce Dayton Sendt: 1. april 2007 06:44 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: PESO - Field I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate your opinions on it. Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm -- Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.23/740 - Release Date: 03/30/2007 13:15 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 03/31/2007 20:54 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
Hi Bruce, On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:43:37 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote: >I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate >your opinions on it. > >Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld >ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > >http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm Hmm, doe not do that much for me. There are two or three slightly different (purple ?) colored flowers near the left side, had that been a single one and more prominent or more saturated it might have made the composition stronger. Allthough the image as it is now may do quite well printed large ... (I can see it hanging in a shrinks waiting room:-) Regards, JvW -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
I like the concept. Not sure about the composition and the lack of DOF. Paul On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > your opinions on it. > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: PESO - Field
Hi Bruce It does not work for me. I would love a really full field of flowers here and more of them in DOF. Maybe you could have concentrated on the middle part leaving out the top and bottom green and use another angle. Can't explain it better... Greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 6:44 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO - Field I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate your opinions on it. Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm -- Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
I like the soft blur in the foreground that takes your view to the sharp center, and then falls off to a blur in the background. Jim A. > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > your opinions on it. > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field
It's trite, cliched and works very, very well. Excellent job on shooting a subject most never pull off. -Adam Bruce Dayton wrote: > I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate > your opinions on it. > > Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld > ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO - Field
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate your opinions on it. Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm -- Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: PESO - Field of trees
Brrr, it looks cold there. The perspective or lack of perspective makes this semi abstract intriguing. There is more grain than I'd expect with 50 ISO Velvia, but I like the effect. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25. oktober 2006 17:36 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO - Field of trees Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Comment appreciated Thanks in advance Kenneth Waller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Bruce, thanks for looking & commenting. > I'm curious if the original is that color - filtered or natural or > what caused you to go so blue with it? Original capture was done in very heavy fog without any filtration, Velvia @50. Using PS CS2, I brought out the trees somewhat as they were very faint, more faint than I remembered, this is most likely where the grain. There is some grain in the original capture but not as evident in the posted image. I also dialed back some of the blue. I've shot Velvia before in situations like this & have also noticed the effect there. Probable an effect of under exposure. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees > I'm generally a sucker for this type of photo. The fog and layers > always intrigue me. So for that reason, I like this photo. > > The scan seems to be showing quite a bit of grain - kind of surprised > me being Velvia. I know it has been mentioned, but it is really blue. > I'm curious if the original is that color - filtered or natural or > what caused you to go so blue with it? > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 8:36:06 AM, you wrote: > > kpc> Check out > kpc> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > kpc> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. > > kpc> Comment appreciated > > kpc> Thanks in advance > > kpc> Kenneth Waller > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Great shot Ken Dave Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Check out > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. > > Comment appreciated > > Thanks in advance > > Kenneth Waller > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
I'm generally a sucker for this type of photo. The fog and layers always intrigue me. So for that reason, I like this photo. The scan seems to be showing quite a bit of grain - kind of surprised me being Velvia. I know it has been mentioned, but it is really blue. I'm curious if the original is that color - filtered or natural or what caused you to go so blue with it? -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 8:36:06 AM, you wrote: kpc> Check out kpc> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html kpc> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. kpc> Comment appreciated kpc> Thanks in advance kpc> Kenneth Waller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Dario, thanks for commenting. The original image is slightly bluer - I dialed some out in PS CS2. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees > Very, very nice! Was the image so blue even on film, or have you enhanced > the effect? > This is not to criticize it, as I like a lot the blue cast on that image. > Just out of curisity. > Dario > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:36 PM > Subject: PESO - Field of trees > > >> Check out >> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html >> >> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. >> >> Comment appreciated >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Kenneth Waller >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Paul, thanks for commenting. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees > Excellent, Ken. I love the monotone effect. It works wonderfully here. > Paul >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html >> > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Jack, thanks for the comments. I actually dialed out some blue for the posted version. Originally captured with out the help of filters. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees > Good eye! Beautifully exposed. It is, however, very blue.(?) > A little additional symmetry might have helped it for me, but I "get > it" and like it. > > Jack > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Check out >> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html >> >> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. >> >> Comment appreciated >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Kenneth Waller >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Hi Ken! > Check out > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. all I can say is - wow! Very nice, the tree on the right looks almost translucent to me. Bedo. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Excellent, Ken. I love the monotone effect. It works wonderfully here. Paul > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Very very nice! Love it. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Good eye! Beautifully exposed. It is, however, very blue.(?) A little additional symmetry might have helped it for me, but I "get it" and like it. Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Check out > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. > > Comment appreciated > > Thanks in advance > > Kenneth Waller > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Field of trees
Very, very nice! Was the image so blue even on film, or have you enhanced the effect? This is not to criticize it, as I like a lot the blue cast on that image. Just out of curisity. Dario - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:36 PM Subject: PESO - Field of trees > Check out > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. > > Comment appreciated > > Thanks in advance > > Kenneth Waller > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO - Field of trees
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Comment appreciated Thanks in advance Kenneth Waller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO: Field
I tend to agree with Tom on this one. G On Aug 8, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Bob W wrote: funnily enough, I rather like that extra ripple at the top (quickly checks for typos...). Much to like about this shot and the geometry/texture! I might suggest cropping the relatively narrow layer at the top. Even though it removes one ripple, I think it makes for a stronger image by removing, to me at least, a distracting element. I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for interesting light I saw this field. Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm @ 70mm. Handheld. Comments are welcome. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/32377264/
RE: PESO: Field
Easy to armchair quarterback... If that last ripple were twice as thick I would likely agree. A delightful shot though. Tom C. From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: Subject: RE: PESO: Field Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:10:43 +0100 funnily enough, I rather like that extra ripple at the top (quickly checks for typos...). -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 August 2005 21:51 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: RE: PESO: Field > > Hi Jens, > > Much to like about this shot and the geometry/texture! I > might suggest cropping the relatively narrow layer at the > top. Even though it removes one ripple, I think it makes for > a stronger image by removing, to me at least, a distracting element. > > Thanks for sharing. > > Tom C. > > > > >From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > >To: > >Subject: PESO: Field > >Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:23:15 +0200 > > > >I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for > >interesting light I saw this field. > >Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm @ 70mm. Handheld. > >Comments are welcome. > > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/32377264/ > > > >Jens Bladt > >Arkitekt MAA > >http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > > > > > > >
RE: PESO: Field
funnily enough, I rather like that extra ripple at the top (quickly checks for typos...). -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 August 2005 21:51 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: RE: PESO: Field > > Hi Jens, > > Much to like about this shot and the geometry/texture! I > might suggest cropping the relatively narrow layer at the > top. Even though it removes one ripple, I think it makes for > a stronger image by removing, to me at least, a distracting element. > > Thanks for sharing. > > Tom C. > > > > >From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > >To: > >Subject: PESO: Field > >Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:23:15 +0200 > > > >I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for > >interesting light I saw this field. > >Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm @ 70mm. Handheld. > >Comments are welcome. > > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/32377264/ > > > >Jens Bladt > >Arkitekt MAA > >http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > > > > > > >
RE: PESO: Field
Hi Jens, Much to like about this shot and the geometry/texture! I might suggest cropping the relatively narrow layer at the top. Even though it removes one ripple, I think it makes for a stronger image by removing, to me at least, a distracting element. Thanks for sharing. Tom C. From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: Subject: PESO: Field Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:23:15 +0200 I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for interesting light I saw this field. Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm @ 70mm. Handheld. Comments are welcome. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/32377264/ Jens Bladt Arkitekt MAA http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
PESO: Field
I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for interesting light I saw this field. Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm @ 70mm. Handheld. Comments are welcome. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/32377264/ Jens Bladt Arkitekt MAA http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
