Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-06 Thread Kenneth Waller
An eye dropper ?


-Original Message-
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

From: steve harley
 on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote
 And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
 insect shooting in a drizzle??

 some flowers are the merest things,
 missed by most until the clouds come over;
 then flatness of the contrast brings
 the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover

How else you going to find Raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens?



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-06 Thread P. J. Alling

On 12/6/2012 2:37 AM, Bob W wrote:

From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms

on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote

And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
insect shooting in a drizzle??

some flowers are the merest things,
missed by most until the clouds come over; then flatness of the
contrast brings the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover

How else you going to find Raindrops on roses and whiskers on
kittens?

I thought it was whisky in kittens


I'm not sure if this would improve the kittens much.



B





--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthly search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-06 Thread Bob W
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
 
 On 12/6/2012 2:37 AM, Bob W wrote:
  From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms
  on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote
  And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
  insect shooting in a drizzle??
  some flowers are the merest things,
  missed by most until the clouds come over; then flatness of the
  contrast brings the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover
  How else you going to find Raindrops on roses and whiskers on
  kittens?
  I thought it was whisky in kittens
 
 I'm not sure if this would improve the kittens much.
 

they start doing Humphrey Bogart impressions, pretending to be in
Catablanca, saying Here's looking at you, kit, and Round up all the usual
suspets.

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-05 Thread Bruce Walker
Who shoots flowers in the drizzle or rain? Well, I for one. :-)

With day-lilies you shoot them when they have come out and are at
their best regardless of the weather. And the light is often optimal
on rainy days.

Both of these were shot in the rain, with DA* glass, tripod and my Tilley hat:

Iris:
http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/3574104231/lightbox/

Flower and insect in one:
http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/3743921363/lightbox/

If I had a WR macro I'd use it for the smaller flowers. I'll probably
get an extension tube for my DA* 50-135.


On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have been using the cheaper 100/3.5 version of the macro lens, and
 find it perfect w/o casting shadows on the subject whether flowers,
 coins, insects or whatever - which may not be possible with a 50 mm
 macro. The shooting distance with a 100 mm macro is optimum - does not
 frighten the subject by being too near it.
 Also as an amateur photographer I shoot macro maybe once in a month.
 And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
 insect shooting in a drizzle??
 Anyway the choice is very much individual.
 Regards. Bipin.
 camp:Toronto, Canada  not from the far away enchanting land.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-05 Thread steve harley

on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote

And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
insect shooting in a drizzle??


some flowers are the merest things,
missed by most until the clouds come over;
then flatness of the contrast brings
the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-05 Thread lrc
Mark!

steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:

on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote
 And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
 insect shooting in a drizzle??

some flowers are the merest things,
missed by most until the clouds come over;
then flatness of the contrast brings
the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-05 Thread John Sessoms

From: steve harley

on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote

And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
insect shooting in a drizzle??


some flowers are the merest things,
missed by most until the clouds come over;
then flatness of the contrast brings
the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover


How else you going to find Raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens?

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-05 Thread Bob W
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms
  on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote
  And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
  insect shooting in a drizzle??
 
  some flowers are the merest things,
  missed by most until the clouds come over; then flatness of the
  contrast brings the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover
 
 How else you going to find Raindrops on roses and whiskers on
 kittens?

I thought it was whisky in kittens

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-05 Thread Bob W
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of steve harley
 
 on 2012-12-03 19:00 Bipin Gupta wrote
  And a WR lens is not at all necessary, for who would go flower or
  insect shooting in a drizzle??
 
 some flowers are the merest things,
 missed by most until the clouds come over; then flatness of the
 contrast brings the less-taxed eye to bitty bracts of clover
 

Feather-footed through the plashy fen passes the questing vole

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread Krisjanis Linkevics
 Quoting J.C. O'Connell 
  90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too
  long
 
 Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously
 I've been wrong.
 
 Brian

That's not wrong, that's just slightly misguided. I really enjoyed my Sigma 180 
macro on the *istD and K10D, now that was all sorts of wrong. Gave me nice 
pictures, though.

kris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Chris.

BTW, how did you catch 30 squid?  G
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Chris Mitchell chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
 On 1 December 2012 14:18, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.

 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

 TIA, Dan

 Hi Dan. I've got a Sigma 50mm 2.8 MF macro. Got it on Ebay for under
 30 quid. I've mostly used it for copying 35mm slides on a light box
 and it does a good job of that - but I can't comment on bokeh. If you
 could get one at that sort of price, it would be worth a punt.

 Chris

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread wendy beard
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Krisjanis Linkevics
krisjanis.linkev...@exigenservices.com wrote:
 Quoting J.C. O'Connell
  90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too
  long

 Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously
 I've been wrong.

 Brian

 That's not wrong, that's just slightly misguided. I really enjoyed my Sigma 
 180 macro on the *istD and K10D, now that was all sorts of wrong. Gave me 
 nice pictures, though.

 kris


I have the Sigma 180 macro too. No complaints with it.

-- 
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread J.C. O'Connell
Macro lenses are just like regular lenses in that there is no
absolute right or wrong focal length, you need multiples.
I have both 50mm and 105mm and I find 50mm works best for larger
items like big flowers. 105mm is better for smaller items
like insects and coins/stamps. You have to use the right tool.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of wendy beard
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:36 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Krisjanis Linkevics
krisjanis.linkev...@exigenservices.com wrote:
 Quoting J.C. O'Connell
  90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too
  long

 Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously
 I've been wrong.

 Brian

 That's not wrong, that's just slightly misguided. I really enjoyed my
Sigma 180 macro on the *istD and K10D, now that was all sorts of wrong. Gave
me nice pictures, though.

 kris


I have the Sigma 180 macro too. No complaints with it.

-- 
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread steve harley

on 2012-12-01 7:18 Daniel J. Matyola wrote

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend


my Sigma EX (non-DG) 105mm f/2.8 is a very nice lens, including for general 
purpose use, though it is more susceptible to flare than my Pentax lenses; i do 
mostly plant photos with it; it's not WR but i have spent hours with it in a 
strong drizzle, being careful (tucking it in my coat and keeping my hand over 
the body of the lens); at $100, it was an unusually good deal for me


i also found an M42 Macro-Takumar 50/4 for something like $40; it produces 
great results, spending most of its time on my partner's Panasonic GH2 (where 
it is 100mm equiv.)



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Darren, that was quite helpful. Do you know how the FA 100mm
2.8 compares to the F and the D FA?

 And thanks to everyone who took the time and effort to give me advice
on this question.  I got exactly the response I was hoping for.  This
is just a great list.

Ho

I finally bit the bullet.  I found a Pentax 100 F2.8 SMC FA MACRO
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 When someone says without getting too pricey it is hard to know what
 the means to them. Later in this thread the OP says that the DFA 100mm
 f2.8 would be good, so assuming that is not too pricey. If that's not
 too pricey, then I think that is your lens.

 For any Pentax lens, you can do some comparisons on the Pentax Photo
 Gallery. Just click the camera and lenses link in the upper right.
 You can select a lens without selecting a body. This will allow you to
 check the various perspective, bokeh, etc. Obviously, this will only
 work for Pentax lenses, but you can go way back to Takumars there, if
 you like.

 The DFA 100mm macro:
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/photos/gallery/query?camera=lens=130

 One option I'll throw out there for you, if you are considering
 popping for a DFA100 macro. You might want to also consider the
 Pentax-F 100mm f2.8 macro. It will cover full frame (obviously) if you
 hope for a future Pentax FF model or still shoot film on occasion. One
 reviewer who previously owned the DFA says the F is faster on the
 autofocus. ( 
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-F-100mm-F2.8-Macro-Lens.html
 ) It also has a focus range limiter, which the DFA lacks (and some
 have missed). Best of all, when the are offered they usually go in the
 $400-500 range, which represents a significant savings over the DFA.
 (They aren't offered often, but one sold on that infernal auction site
 within the past 30 days for a $430 BIN.)

 I got mine for effectively free when I found a P-Z1 kit with multiple
 lenses, flash and accessories and sold off the other stuff to keep the
 F100. Due to life going to hell in a handbasket, I haven't gotten to
 use it much yet, but I'm glad to have it in my arsenal.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread Christine Aguila
Doesn't Mark Roberts have this lens as well.  I think he showed us pics from it 
as well.  If i remember correctly, they were lovely.  Cheers, Christine 



On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:35 AM, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Krisjanis Linkevics
 krisjanis.linkev...@exigenservices.com wrote:
 Quoting J.C. O'Connell
 90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too
 long
 
 Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously
 I've been wrong.
 
 Brian
 
 That's not wrong, that's just slightly misguided. I really enjoyed my Sigma 
 180 macro on the *istD and K10D, now that was all sorts of wrong. Gave me 
 nice pictures, though.
 
 kris
 
 
 I have the Sigma 180 macro too. No complaints with it.
 
 -- 
 Wendy Beard
 Carp, Ontario
 Canada
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread Mark Roberts
Christine Aguila wrote:

Doesn't Mark Roberts have this lens as well.  I think he showed us pics from 
it as well.  If i remember correctly, they were lovely.  Cheers, Christine 

Yep. The Sigma 180/3.5 Macro is a brilliant lens. Probably my second
most used lens for nature photography (after the DA*16-50/2.8). It's
sharp, sharp, sharp and built like the proverbial tank. Also works
extremely well as a telephoto at long distance (not all macro lenses
work well at non-macro distances).

 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-03 Thread Miserere
Not quite compact nor cheap though, right?

And hadn't we established that 90mm was already way too long? Where
are you going with 180mm, Mark? You're doing it wrong, mate. Anything
longer than 35mm for a macro lens is photographic suicide.

Now that I got that off my chest, I'm off to bed.

G'night!


   —M.

\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment



On 3 December 2012 20:26, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
 Christine Aguila wrote:

Doesn't Mark Roberts have this lens as well.  I think he showed us pics from 
it as well.  If i remember correctly, they were lovely.  Cheers, Christine

 Yep. The Sigma 180/3.5 Macro is a brilliant lens. Probably my second
 most used lens for nature photography (after the DA*16-50/2.8). It's
 sharp, sharp, sharp and built like the proverbial tank. Also works
 extremely well as a telephoto at long distance (not all macro lenses
 work well at non-macro distances).


 --
 Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
 www.robertstech.com





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-02 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
there is no difference in performance, until the day after they get
soaking wet.

LOL!

That is what I assumed, but when I assume, I make an ass of u and me.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:

 On Dec 1, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

 How much of a difference is there (in performance) between the WR
 version and the standard version of the D FA 100mm macro?

 My understanding is that there is no difference in performance, until the day 
 after they get soaking wet.


 --
 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-02 Thread John Sessoms

An aside on one of the joys of Pentax here ...

I go to a weekly brunch with a group of local photographers. Recently
one of them came in and said, You shoot Pentax don't you?

When I answered affirmatively, he handed me a small box labeled:

ASAHI PENTAX SMC CLOSE UP LENS 49mm S40

Still new in the box, complete.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-02 Thread Boris Liberman

I couldn't possibly tell as I have none of the two.

I am certain that the likes of pbase.com or pixelpeeper.com will provide 
ample amount of images including some at full resolution.


On 12/2/2012 7:25 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

How much of a difference is there (in performance) between the WR
version and the standard version of the D FA 100mm macro?

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:

It is so frustratingly silly. Found the original message...

It suddenly occurred to me, Dan, that you may have a good and solid excuse
to buy into DFA 100/2.8 Macro WR lens and get yourself a proper outdoor
macro kit in terms of WR.

Though it is not cheap.

But again, my vote would be for D-FA 50/2.8 macro - seems like it has many
things from many worlds (aperture ring, FF coverage - can be used on film,
very good image quality both in non-macro range, etc)...


On 12/1/2012 4:18 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:


I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-02 Thread Chris Mitchell
On 1 December 2012 14:18, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.

 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

 TIA, Dan

Hi Dan. I've got a Sigma 50mm 2.8 MF macro. Got it on Ebay for under
30 quid. I've mostly used it for copying 35mm slides on a light box
and it does a good job of that - but I can't comment on bokeh. If you
could get one at that sort of price, it would be worth a punt.

Chris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-02 Thread Darren Addy
When someone says without getting too pricey it is hard to know what
the means to them. Later in this thread the OP says that the DFA 100mm
f2.8 would be good, so assuming that is not too pricey. If that's not
too pricey, then I think that is your lens.

For any Pentax lens, you can do some comparisons on the Pentax Photo
Gallery. Just click the camera and lenses link in the upper right.
You can select a lens without selecting a body. This will allow you to
check the various perspective, bokeh, etc. Obviously, this will only
work for Pentax lenses, but you can go way back to Takumars there, if
you like.

The DFA 100mm macro:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/photos/gallery/query?camera=lens=130

One option I'll throw out there for you, if you are considering
popping for a DFA100 macro. You might want to also consider the
Pentax-F 100mm f2.8 macro. It will cover full frame (obviously) if you
hope for a future Pentax FF model or still shoot film on occasion. One
reviewer who previously owned the DFA says the F is faster on the
autofocus. ( 
http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-F-100mm-F2.8-Macro-Lens.html
) It also has a focus range limiter, which the DFA lacks (and some
have missed). Best of all, when the are offered they usually go in the
$400-500 range, which represents a significant savings over the DFA.
(They aren't offered often, but one sold on that infernal auction site
within the past 30 days for a $430 BIN.)

I got mine for effectively free when I found a P-Z1 kit with multiple
lenses, flash and accessories and sold off the other stuff to keep the
F100. Due to life going to hell in a handbasket, I haven't gotten to
use it much yet, but I'm glad to have it in my arsenal.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread David J Brooks
Not sure if its out of price range, but i bought the Pentax DA F 50
F2.8 about 3 years ago and i like it., Nice sharp images. My only nit
is the locking clamp is not that secure but i never use it anyway.
Dave

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.

 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

 TIA, Dan

 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Bulent Celasun
I like shooting macros.
Of the three dedicated macro lenses I have, I find myself using the
Sigma EX 70mm f/2.8 more.
The others are the Vivitar Series 1 105 mm f/2.5 (beautiful, heavy,
rather hard to stabilize well;
and Pentax F 50mm f/2.8, which is at least as lovely).

I hear/read good things for the Talron 90mm f/2.8 as well.

Bulent

-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun


2012/12/1 Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.

 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

 TIA, Dan

 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Tom C
I've experience with only the FA 100/2.8  macro.

It's not a pretty beast, but I've always thought it delivered great results. 
Used they seem to be going for $350 -$500.

In my mind, the advantages of a 100mm is you can be twice as far from your 
subject and still get the desired framing. Also the relatively large aperture 
is nice. It doubles as a sharp mid-range telephoto or portrait lens.

There's one described as like new on eBay. Bidding is currently at $264. 
Several others also. I found my copy at a used lens counter.

Few shots:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13295397

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502297

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502298

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502295

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502293

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6468680

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4042765

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5092852

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4912137

Tom C.




I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Larry Colen

On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.
 
 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

I have run into the uncomfortable realization that focal length on a macro lens 
is as important in different situations as it is in a standard lens, and for 
the same reasons.  Sometimes you want to include more of the background, 
sometimes you want to restrict the background.  Sometimes you want maximum 
magnification from a distance, sometimes you want to include more of the 
subject, but don't have room to move the camera back.

I have three lenses that I regularly use for macro and closeup work, my Sigma 
20/1.8, Pentax DFA 50/2.8 and a Tamron 90/2.8.  I choose which one to use based 
on focal length for that particular shot, rather than any other qualities of 
the lens.  It generally works out to using the 90 for insects, and often the 20 
or the 50 for flowers or mushrooms. If I were going out to buy a macro lens 
today, I'd probably pick up a Pentax 100/2.8 WR macro.  If I were tight on 
money, I'd get a Raynox 150.  I briefly had a Raynox 250, and it was too 
powerful for many of my shots.
  
   LRC

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread George Sinos
I agree with Tom C.

I don't shoot macro a lot so I chose the 100 f2.8 for a couple of
reasons.  It's a decent lens, of course, but the 100mm focal length on
the crop sensor body lets me have a decent working distance between
the camera and the subject.  If you're going to do anything with
supplemental lighting you need a bit of space that you won't have with
a shorter focal length.

It's also a good lens for general shooting when you want to use a
longer focal length.  I grew up with photography in the years when
zooms were not so good, and the combination of a 35mm, 50mm, and 135mm
lens was fairly common.  The 100mm macro on the crop body has an angle
of view that is just slightly tighter, but similar to my old 135mm
lens.

Here's an old post of a shot made with the 100 f/2.8.

http://georges.posterous.com/blooming-at-sunrise#!/

gs

George Sinos

gsi...@gmail.com
www.georgesphotos.net
plus.georgesinos.com


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've experience with only the FA 100/2.8  macro.

 It's not a pretty beast, but I've always thought it delivered great results. 
 Used they seem to be going for $350 -$500.

 In my mind, the advantages of a 100mm is you can be twice as far from your 
 subject and still get the desired framing. Also the relatively large aperture 
 is nice. It doubles as a sharp mid-range telephoto or portrait lens.

 There's one described as like new on eBay. Bidding is currently at $264. 
 Several others also. I found my copy at a used lens counter.

 Few shots:

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13295397

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502297

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502298

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502295

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502293

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6468680

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4042765

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5092852

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4912137

 Tom C.




I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola

 --
 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Bob Sullivan
I have used the the Pentax A100/2.8 Macro the most shooting film.
Some time ago Mark Cassino convinced me to upgrade to the DFA100/2.8.
Both work fine on the K-5 and manual focusing is no problem w/ Macros.
Most every macro lens is very good.
The manual focus old ones for film should be cheapest.
The Pentax K100/4.0 Macro might be cheapest.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:39 AM, George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I agree with Tom C.

 I don't shoot macro a lot so I chose the 100 f2.8 for a couple of
 reasons.  It's a decent lens, of course, but the 100mm focal length on
 the crop sensor body lets me have a decent working distance between
 the camera and the subject.  If you're going to do anything with
 supplemental lighting you need a bit of space that you won't have with
 a shorter focal length.

 It's also a good lens for general shooting when you want to use a
 longer focal length.  I grew up with photography in the years when
 zooms were not so good, and the combination of a 35mm, 50mm, and 135mm
 lens was fairly common.  The 100mm macro on the crop body has an angle
 of view that is just slightly tighter, but similar to my old 135mm
 lens.

 Here's an old post of a shot made with the 100 f/2.8.

 http://georges.posterous.com/blooming-at-sunrise#!/

 gs

 George Sinos
 
 gsi...@gmail.com
 www.georgesphotos.net
 plus.georgesinos.com


 On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've experience with only the FA 100/2.8  macro.

 It's not a pretty beast, but I've always thought it delivered great results. 
 Used they seem to be going for $350 -$500.

 In my mind, the advantages of a 100mm is you can be twice as far from your 
 subject and still get the desired framing. Also the relatively large 
 aperture is nice. It doubles as a sharp mid-range telephoto or portrait lens.

 There's one described as like new on eBay. Bidding is currently at $264. 
 Several others also. I found my copy at a used lens counter.

 Few shots:

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13295397

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502297

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502298

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502295

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6502293

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6468680

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4042765

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5092852

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4912137

 Tom C.




I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola

 --
 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread William Robb

On 01/12/2012 8:18 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

It used to be that any macro lens was a good lens, and to a great extent 
this still holds. The only caveat I would make is to stay away from the 
older Pentax macros that employ the FREE lens system (fixed rear element 
extension). My A100/2.8 macro is a gorgeous lens, but tends to get 
reflections off the flat rear element onto the sensor.
I don't have experience with any of the third party macros at this 
point. I would bet that they are all very good lenses, I ended up buying 
a Pentax DFA100/2.8 Macro, and I am very happy with it, though 
interestingly, it must be only from looking through the viewfinder, 
because I Lightroom didn't pull up a single image taken with that lens.

This is the curse I live under.

--

William Robb

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Brian Walters


Quoting William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:


On 01/12/2012 8:18 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

It used to be that any macro lens was a good lens, and to a great  
extent this still holds. The only caveat I would make is to stay  
away from the older Pentax macros that employ the FREE lens system  
(fixed rear element extension). My A100/2.8 macro is a gorgeous  
lens, but tends to get reflections off the flat rear element onto  
the sensor.
I don't have experience with any of the third party macros at this  
point. I would bet that they are all very good lenses, I ended up  
buying a Pentax DFA100/2.8 Macro, and I am very happy with it,  
though interestingly, it must be only from looking through the  
viewfinder, because I Lightroom didn't pull up a single image taken  
with that lens.

This is the curse I live under.




For years (decades, actually) I used the old Tamron 90mm f2.5  
(adaptall lens), mainly for wildflower photography and it was my  
favourite lens.


I recently upgraded to the current version (Tamron 90mm f2.8) mainly  
for autofocus as my eyesight isn't what it was.  I haven't used it  
much to date but I expect it to be as good as the old version.


Like Bill's experience with the Pentax A100/2.8, the old Tamron also  
suffered from reflections off the rear element but, interestingly, I  
never noticed until earlier this year (there was a thread about it on  
PDML back in April or thereabouts).  The problem only occurred under  
specific light conditions and I never saw any evidence of it with my  
wildflower photography.


I also have an old Takumar 50mm macro and a Konica Hexanon 55mm macro  
(which surprising can be used on Pentax DSLRs via a short extension  
tube) but I've found I prefer the greater working distance that the  
90mm lens provides.



--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Bruce Walker
My one macro is the DA 35mm F:2.8 Ltd. It has served my very well.
It's small, light, sharp, and makes a great general purpose. It
doesn't have a focus stop so AF can be slow to resolve if it misses
focus on the first try.

I love it for plants and small objects, but I'd really want a 100mm or
longer macro for insects. I've had no trouble getting light into where
I need it using either a ring flash, some diffusion behind the object
(white paper works), or bouncing light from some white foam core.


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.

 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

 TIA, Dan

 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
I use my Pentax-A 50/2.8 macro almost exclusively these days.
(It also covers all my cliché shots.)
They run from $100 to $150.  F/2.8 is reasonably fast.  And the A is nice
for DSLR use.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
ditto. they run a little higher though, more like $150-$225.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Collin Brendemuehl
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 4:33 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens 

I use my Pentax-A 50/2.8 macro almost exclusively these days.
(It also covers all my cliché shots.)
They run from $100 to $150.  F/2.8 is reasonably fast.  And the A is nice
for DSLR use.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Mark Cassino
Depending on the type of work you want to do, I 'd go with either a 
100mm or 50mm f2.8 macro. Personally I use a D-FA 100 f2.8 and find the 
results to be excellent. I have a Sigman 50mm f 2.8 that is also 
excellent. I also use an M 50 f4 macro from time to time.


Type of work you want to do... For bugs longer focal length, fast 
manual focus and / or auto focus. I usually want close 1:1 to 1:2 
magnification and to isolate the subject against the background. For 
flowers I usually shoot at a lower magnification and want a little more 
background in the shot, so a shorter focal length works out well.


Some manual focus macro lenses trade off precision in focusing for 
focusing speed. I have a older Kiron 105mm f 2.8 (I believe the same 
lens as the Vivitar Series 1 f 2.5 (Kiron was the OEM for Vivitar)). I 
just checked it - the lens barrel rotates just under 2 complete 
rotations to go from infinity to 1:1. By contrast the D-FA requires just 
under one full rotation of the focusing collar to cover the same 
focusing range. One facilitates precision, the other speed.


Lastly, I would not give the Kiron an unqualified recommendation. It 
works great with film and I've had good results with digital, but I've 
had some shots on DSLR's that have suffered from chromatic aberrations, 
fringing, whatever. If needed a 100mm macro, I would not get the Kiron 
for a DSLR.


Mark


On 12/1/2012 9:18 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
Some manual focus macro lenses trade off precision in focusing for 
focusing speed. I have a older Kiron 105mm f 2.8 (I believe the same 
lens as the Vivitar Series 1 f 2.5 (Kiron was the OEM for Vivitar)). I 
just checked it - the lens barrel rotates just under 2 complete 
rotations to go from infinity to 1:1. By contrast the D-FA requires just 
under one full rotation of the focusing collar to cover the same 
focusing range. One facilitates precision, the other speed.

The local Cord Camera as a Kiron for $300.
Pricey, but apparently highly regarded.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread jn289
Dan, did you ever consider extension tubes ? This would mean manual 
focus and you can use them with any lens that have a manual aperture 
setting. I understand the newer 35 mm  Pentax macro is nice.I use a 
60 mm manual focus and manual aperture screw mount lens with a screw 
mount to k mount adapter which in made by Yashica and is very very 
nice. Also as others have spoken about  is the Pentax k mount 100mm 
F4.0 manual focus which is also nice, which I have. The 100 mm F2.8 A 
Pentax lens is an auto focus lens which I like and use sometimes. 
Also there is a Pentax 50 mm  F2.8 A that is manual focus which I 
also use.The other one that I use is the 200 mm F4.0 A Pentax lens 
which is very very nice, but this is also manual focus..Dan hope this 
this gives you some help..Joe





I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
and follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
Highly recommended for that usage.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
interesting and very informative posts.

I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
thinking about it.

Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
manual focus mode.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
 product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
 Highly recommended for that usage.

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
warning - 100mm is best suited for very small items like insects or coins.
its too long for larger items like general flowers and plants. Also, I 
would recommend manual focus lenses as manual focus seems to work best
with macro and af lenses dont do mf that well.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 9:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
interesting and very informative posts.

I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
thinking about it.

Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
manual focus mode.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
 product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
 Highly recommended for that usage.

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Boris Liberman
I don't seem to be able to find the original message though I remember 
reading it... Getting senile, I may be...


As for the question in hand. Galia's been using D-FA 50/2.8 macro as her 
standard lens with great success both for close up and regular 
photography. This lens seems to be pretty much ideal sans rather flimsy 
two-cam barrel design and somewhat slow maximal aperture. However for 
macro lens it is normal, as the likes of Zeiss 50/2.0 macro (or is it 
maKro ? :-) ) cost several times as much. Additionally, it is very sharp 
even wide open and the sharpness is uniform across the frame, so that 
whatever is missing in speed is compensated by Galia's K-5's sensor.


If one wants to go really cheap I can totally recommend FA 100/3.5 
macro. Galia has one and uses it occasionally with good results as well. 
It would be worth one's while to look for matching filter that makes it 
true 1:1 macro. It also suffers from rather plastic build, but optically 
it is really very good and rather inexpensive.


Boris


On 12/1/2012 11:32 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:

I use my Pentax-A 50/2.8 macro almost exclusively these days.
(It also covers all my cliché shots.)
They run from $100 to $150.  F/2.8 is reasonably fast.  And the A is nice
for DSLR use.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Brian Walters


Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


warning - 100mm is best suited for very small items like insects or coins.
its too long for larger items like general flowers and plants. Also, I
would recommend manual focus lenses as manual focus seems to work best
with macro and af lenses dont do mf that well.



That's not my experience.  I find my 90mm macro just about perfect for  
wildflower photography and for many years in the 70s and 80s that was  
about the only photography I did.




Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/






-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 9:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
interesting and very informative posts.

I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
thinking about it.

Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
manual focus mode.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:

I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
Highly recommended for that usage.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-


--



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Boris Liberman

It is so frustratingly silly. Found the original message...

It suddenly occurred to me, Dan, that you may have a good and solid 
excuse to buy into DFA 100/2.8 Macro WR lens and get yourself a proper 
outdoor macro kit in terms of WR.


Though it is not cheap.

But again, my vote would be for D-FA 50/2.8 macro - seems like it has 
many things from many worlds (aperture ring, FF coverage - can be used 
on film, very good image quality both in non-macro range, etc)...


On 12/1/2012 4:18 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
as well, that would be a plus.

What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

TIA, Dan

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
How much of a difference is there (in performance) between the WR
version and the standard version of the D FA 100mm macro?

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
 It is so frustratingly silly. Found the original message...

 It suddenly occurred to me, Dan, that you may have a good and solid excuse
 to buy into DFA 100/2.8 Macro WR lens and get yourself a proper outdoor
 macro kit in terms of WR.

 Though it is not cheap.

 But again, my vote would be for D-FA 50/2.8 macro - seems like it has many
 things from many worlds (aperture ring, FF coverage - can be used on film,
 very good image quality both in non-macro range, etc)...


 On 12/1/2012 4:18 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

 I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when
 eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along.  Without
 getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture
 and good bokeh.  I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies
 and the like.  If it could take decent images outside the macro range
 as well, that would be a plus.

 What are others using?  What moderately price lens would you recommend

 TIA, Dan

 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Larry Colen

On Dec 1, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

 How much of a difference is there (in performance) between the WR
 version and the standard version of the D FA 100mm macro?

My understanding is that there is no difference in performance, until the day 
after they get soaking wet.


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too long


-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 11:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens


Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:

 warning - 100mm is best suited for very small items like insects or coins.
 its too long for larger items like general flowers and plants. Also, I
 would recommend manual focus lenses as manual focus seems to work best
 with macro and af lenses dont do mf that well.


That's not my experience.  I find my 90mm macro just about perfect for  
wildflower photography and for many years in the 70s and 80s that was  
about the only photography I did.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/





 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -

 -Original Message-
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
 Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 9:16 PM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

 Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
 interesting and very informative posts.

 I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
 thinking about it.

 Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
 Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
 bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
 back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
 need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
 manual focus mode.

 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


 On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
 product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
 Highly recommended for that usage.

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -


 --


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Brian Walters

Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too long




Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously  
I've been wrong.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/




-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 11:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens


Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


warning - 100mm is best suited for very small items like insects or coins.
its too long for larger items like general flowers and plants. Also, I
would recommend manual focus lenses as manual focus seems to work best
with macro and af lenses dont do mf that well.



That's not my experience.  I find my 90mm macro just about perfect for
wildflower photography and for many years in the 70s and 80s that was
about the only photography I did.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/






-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 9:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
interesting and very informative posts.

I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
thinking about it.

Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
manual focus mode.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:

I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
Highly recommended for that usage.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-


--



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
and follow the directions.



--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
Im not saying it cant be done, but in MY experience, its too tight
when using 100mm for larger items. There is a lack of background
and flattening of perspective I don't like with 100mm either.

Even a 50mm works out to a 75mm equiv which is still slightly flattening.

There is also the practical aspect of having to back away too much
with a 100mm.  Sometimes I use my free hand/arm to stabilize the
branch the flower is on and if you use 100mm you may be out of
arms reach, which you're not if your closer with a 50mm.

To each his own technique I guess

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 1:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:

 90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too long



Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously  
I've been wrong.


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



 -

 -Original Message-
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
 Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 11:41 PM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens


 Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:

 warning - 100mm is best suited for very small items like insects or
coins.
 its too long for larger items like general flowers and plants. Also, I
 would recommend manual focus lenses as manual focus seems to work best
 with macro and af lenses dont do mf that well.


 That's not my experience.  I find my 90mm macro just about perfect for
 wildflower photography and for many years in the 70s and 80s that was
 about the only photography I did.



 Cheers

 Brian

 ++
 Brian Walters
 Western Sydney Australia
 http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/





 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -

 -Original Message-
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
 Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 9:16 PM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

 Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
 interesting and very informative posts.

 I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
 thinking about it.

 Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
 Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
 bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
 back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
 need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
 manual focus mode.

 Dan Matyola
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


 On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
 product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
 Highly recommended for that usage.

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -


 --


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

2012-12-01 Thread Brian Walters

Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


Im not saying it cant be done, but in MY experience, its too tight
when using 100mm for larger items. There is a lack of background
and flattening of perspective I don't like with 100mm either.

Even a 50mm works out to a 75mm equiv which is still slightly flattening.

There is also the practical aspect of having to back away too much
with a 100mm.  Sometimes I use my free hand/arm to stabilize the
branch the flower is on and if you use 100mm you may be out of
arms reach, which you're not if your closer with a 50mm.

To each his own technique I guess




Fair enough.


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 1:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


90mm would be fine on 35mm film but on a pentax aps-c dslr its too long




Well I've been using it for the last 7 years on APS-C but obviously
I've been wrong.


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/




-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 11:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens


Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


warning - 100mm is best suited for very small items like insects or

coins.

its too long for larger items like general flowers and plants. Also, I
would recommend manual focus lenses as manual focus seems to work best
with macro and af lenses dont do mf that well.



That's not my experience.  I find my 90mm macro just about perfect for
wildflower photography and for many years in the 70s and 80s that was
about the only photography I did.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/






-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 9:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice on Selection of Macro Lens

Thanks, William, Brian, Bruce, Collin, JC, Mark and Joe, for your
interesting and very informative posts.

I think I am leaning towards the Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8, but still
thinking about it.

Joe, I did quite a bit of work with extension tube when I used only my
Asahi Spotmatic and my Honeywell Spotmatic.  It was actually quite a
bit of fun.   I don't have either the eyesight or the patience to go
back to extension tubes at this point in my life, however..  I think I
need autofocus to get in the ball park before final adjustment in
manual focus mode.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:

I use my SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 almost exclusively for
product photography (ebay) and results are excellent.
Highly recommended for that usage.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.