Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-19 Thread John Mustarde

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:22:53 -0400, you wrote:

>You must work and live around a bunch of crooks or something.
>And your full of s**t on most of the rest by the way.

I'm simply describing facts as I know them, shitty as they are. Those
facts may or may not generalize to the entire population of UPS
drivers.

>At business
>addresses they must deliver them to a live person so if they can't find
>anybody they will leave them at another office. 

That may be the company policy, but not everybody follows company
policy. In other words, baloney. The time pressure on UPS drivers will
force them into a lot of rule-breaking behavior, including even (gasp)
double-parking!

When we used UPS daily, the driver(s) would take a quick look for a
shipping guy, and if there was none in sight they would leave the
packages on the shipping counter, sign the actual name of one of our
shipping guys in an almost illegible script, then hustle back to their
truck.

We caught on to this when one of our shipping employees switched from
day shift to night shift, yet his signature continued to be used by
UPS. According to the UPS documentation, our employee was signing for
packages four hours after he left the building, at a time when he
wasn't even in the same county.

The UPS investigator researched driver behavior at other sites, over
the course of several months, and told me he believed signature
forgery was an ongoing pattern adopted by the driver(s) he was
investigating. He even had a name for it - internally, UPS calls it
"going pencil happy" or something like that.

>So you think somebody making
>a decent salary like that is going to steal a measly little camera without
>knowing what's in the package?

I'm sure you know that even well-paid workers pilfer from their jobs.
Happens all the time. Doesn't make sense for people to jeopardize
their livelihood for a few bucks, but some will do it anyway.

Funny story - a corporate big-shot I once knew, who had ethics of
which I did not approve, went to turn in his laptop on the day he
"voluntarily" left the company. Oddly enough, his laptop mysteriously
crashed the night before, and triple-wiped mil-spec scrubbed the hard
drive clean. Hmmm. 

>I hate to say it but it's more likely the guy who got the package stole it
>and claimed he never got it if he didn't sign for it than the UPS delivery
>guy got it. Statistics tend to bear this out. So even if it wasn't the case
>the circumstances tend to favor that explanation based on the law of
>averages. 

I don't know where you got those "statistics", but in any event the
list of possible thieves is very short, and certainly includes the UPS
driver. 

I can directly connect one specific theft to a "pencil happy" UPS
driver. In that case, the driver is suspected of being the thief
because he did not obtain a valid signature for his supposed delivery,
even though there was a signature filed. But you are right that I
don't have any eyewitness to that theft - that's because none of my
shipping employees was in the shipping department at the time of that
particular alleged delivery.

Sssshit, I'm on my UPS rant again. I quit. No more UPS stories for me
for the rest of the year. And I'll refrain from my rant about Pentax
in Colorado, too. There's another bunch of nincompoops, at least at
the management level.

--
John Mustarde
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-19 Thread Tom Rittenhouse

Also, while UPS pays their regular employees well they are notoriously cheap
about paying temp and seasonal employees.

BUT, wait, I want to tell my newest adventure with a parcel service. In this
case Fed Ex Ground. First Fed Ex Air and Fed Ex Ground seem to be completely
separate entities. There is a Fed Ex Air office just a few blocks from my
house. So when I got a card in the mail saying they could not find the
house, I went there to pick up my package.

Sorry, this is a Fed Ex Ground package they are over on the other side of
town. Can you give me directions? I'll call them and let them tell you how
to get there. Sorry Sir all I am getting is an answering machine. Let me
dial their 800 number, here you are sir.

They are on CSX Way sir. I am not familiar with that street could you tell
me how to get there, I am at your Whendover Rd office right now. Let me call
them and get directions for you. Sorry sir all I am getting is a answering
machine. I guess you will have to go over there yourself (to get directions
on how to get there?).

Out in the car I check my map. The street directory says it is about as far
away as it could be and still be in the Charlotte area. Ah, there it is a
little spur of a road, off of that road, off of a road I know about. Thirty
minutes latter I am there. Visitor parking, OK. Now how do I get  in.  Humm
looks like a gate office down there. Walk a half mile. Yes sir the pickup
office is all the way down on the left. Walk 3/4 mile.

Oh yes sir let me just call this number back any they will bring up your
package. Wait and wait and wait. Sorry sir I can not find your package my I
see your post card. Oh that's it she gave me the wrong date, just a moment.
Wait and wait. He you are sir just sign here. Finally.

Walk 3/4 mile back to the gate. Take every thing out of your pockets sir I
have to run the wand over you and pat you down before you can leave.

Walking 1/2 mile to the car, I decide, If anyone sends me something via Fed
Ex Ground again, I will refuse the package!

--graywolf


- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: RE: More UPS Crap


> Kent Gittings wrote:
> > You must work and live around a bunch of crooks or something.
> > And your full of s**t on most of the rest by the way.  [Snip...]
>
> Gee, Kent -- and I thought Mick's shorts were on a little tight!
Actually,
> John Mustarde's experiences are similar to some of the rest of us who have
> used UPS.  Perhaps you've been exceptionally lucky.  I'm not impressed
with
> UPS, and I prefer using an alternative carrier.  Count your blessings if
> you've had better luck than the rest of us.
>
> > And if you don't know it all UPS drivers use an electronic signature
> > pad device that can't be replayed except at the distribution center
> > where it gets down loaded at the end of the day. So they can't call
> > it up on the little screen and practice forging some signatures.
> [snip...]
>
> I don't think John was suggesting that drivers practice on the electronic
> facsimiles of the signatures.  If they're making regular deliveries to the
> business, they most certainly see all kinds of that company's paperwork
> laying around the warehouse, so they could conceivably be very familiar
with
> signatures for particular individuals.
>
> > At business addresses they must deliver them to a live person so if
> > they can't find anybody they will leave them at another office.
[snip...]
>
> Kent, some businesses -- like the one where I work -- take up more
physical
> space than a lot of small towns.  Hell, we even have our own water
treatment
> plant and fire and rescue department!  In my building alone, there are
over
> 100 people, and the shipping/receiving department closes at 3:30 PM.  We
> frequently have shipments dropped off by the UPS driver at the wrong
> building, and these get "lost" for sometimes a week at a time.  We have
had
> incidents in the past where a UPS driver will drop off a shipment on the
> dock, either without a proper signature, or with the signature of some
> employee not authorized to sign.  These have been perishable materials
worth
> thousands, and sometimes TENS of thousands, of US dollars.  Once it thaws,
> it's garbage.  As another enlightening example, consider the following.
My
> parents live in the kind of nice, upscale suburban neighborhood where most
> everyone's gone during the day, and the possibility of daytime burglaries
is
> not all that remote.  My father ordered a $2000 telescope a few years ago.
> Three large, heavy boxes containing the telescope were dropped on his
> doorstep in the middle of the afternoon by the UPS driver.  The 

RE: More UPS Crap

2001-10-19 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]

Kent Gittings wrote:
> You must work and live around a bunch of crooks or something.
> And your full of s**t on most of the rest by the way.  [Snip...]

Gee, Kent -- and I thought Mick's shorts were on a little tight!  Actually,
John Mustarde's experiences are similar to some of the rest of us who have
used UPS.  Perhaps you've been exceptionally lucky.  I'm not impressed with
UPS, and I prefer using an alternative carrier.  Count your blessings if
you've had better luck than the rest of us.

> And if you don't know it all UPS drivers use an electronic signature
> pad device that can't be replayed except at the distribution center
> where it gets down loaded at the end of the day. So they can't call
> it up on the little screen and practice forging some signatures.
[snip...]

I don't think John was suggesting that drivers practice on the electronic
facsimiles of the signatures.  If they're making regular deliveries to the
business, they most certainly see all kinds of that company's paperwork
laying around the warehouse, so they could conceivably be very familiar with
signatures for particular individuals.

> At business addresses they must deliver them to a live person so if
> they can't find anybody they will leave them at another office.  [snip...]

Kent, some businesses -- like the one where I work -- take up more physical
space than a lot of small towns.  Hell, we even have our own water treatment
plant and fire and rescue department!  In my building alone, there are over
100 people, and the shipping/receiving department closes at 3:30 PM.  We
frequently have shipments dropped off by the UPS driver at the wrong
building, and these get "lost" for sometimes a week at a time.  We have had
incidents in the past where a UPS driver will drop off a shipment on the
dock, either without a proper signature, or with the signature of some
employee not authorized to sign.  These have been perishable materials worth
thousands, and sometimes TENS of thousands, of US dollars.  Once it thaws,
it's garbage.  As another enlightening example, consider the following.  My
parents live in the kind of nice, upscale suburban neighborhood where most
everyone's gone during the day, and the possibility of daytime burglaries is
not all that remote.  My father ordered a $2000 telescope a few years ago.
Three large, heavy boxes containing the telescope were dropped on his
doorstep in the middle of the afternoon by the UPS driver.  The driver rang
the doorbell, but by the time my mother got down the stairs to answer, the
driver was nowhere to be seen.  And one of the boxes was damaged to boot!

> So you think somebody making a decent salary like that is going to
> steal a measly little camera without knowing what's in the package?
[snip...]

Gosh, I thought UPS knew full well the contents and value, since both of
these have to be declared on the customer paperwork.  I certainly DO think
an unscrupulous driver would be tempted to steal.  In fact, there was a
recent case in New York state in which several UPS employees were arrested
for theft of firearms shipped by UPS.  I'm certainly not suggesting that
~most~ UPS drivers would steal, or that theft is common -- but it doesn't
matter what the percentages are if you happen to be the one rare customer
who loses something of value.

> I hate to say it but it's more likely the guy who got the package stole
> it and claimed he never got it if he didn't sign for it than the UPS
> delivery guy got it. Statistics tend to bear this out. So even if it
wasn't
> the case the circumstances tend to favor that explanation based on
> the law of averages.  [snip...]

Statistics??  Law of averages??  You're kidding, right?  Are there
unscrupulous customers who submit fraudulent claims against UPS?
Undoubtedly; however, UPS probably does keep their insurance claims down due
to the Byzantine procedures for filing such claims.  Can't say I've ever
seen any statistics concerning the moral integrity of UPS employees vs. the
general population, but common sense would tell you that a UPS employee with
criminal intent would certainly have a much greater opportunity at robbing
from UPS than a customer would.

> Especially since an LX is only going to be valuable to another
> Pentax person.  [snip...]

Ah, you mean like the "professional photographer" who stole Albano's LX at
gunpoint this past week?  Get real, Kent.  The only kind of person
interested in stealing valuable cameras is a person who believes he can sell
it for quick cash.  That's a pretty broad category, Kent.

Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More UPS Crap

2001-10-19 Thread Rodger Whitlock

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 15:46:05 -0400, "Mick Maguire" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Robert Harris wrote:
> 
> >Don't over generalize
> 
> I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over
> generalization as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment
> very offensive >8-|

You mean you don't like women working as corporate lawyers?

[Is joke. Relax.]

-- 
Rodger Whitlock
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Tom Rittenhouse

Well, I have always insisted the the proper pronounciation of UPS  (to mix
in another thread) is Oops!

But at least Oops can deliver to my house which Airborne Express insists
doesn't exist and returns all packages to the sender.
--graywolf
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Mick Maguire

Maybe many will think misogyny was a bit strong, at the very least it was
extremely sexist and derogatory.

Regards,
/\/\ick...

++
||
 __/)   Mick Maguire |
|   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
(_/)  ICQ: 48609010  |
 \/  |
  \  /---+



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Harris
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More UPS Crap


Mick Maguire wrote:


> I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over
generalization
> as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment very offensive >8-|

Huh?  The Harriet reference is, perhaps, not PC. And maybe it can be
construed as insulting, condescending or many other negative things,
depending on one's viewpoint and mindset. But I certainly see nothing in
the message that even hints at "misogyny," which means hatred of women.

Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Mick Maguire

I know what it means Robert!... Perhaps you should re-read, particularly the
bit about Harriet screwing the delivery driver?

Regards,
/\/\ick...

++
||
 __/)   Mick Maguire |
|   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
(_/)  ICQ: 48609010  |
 \/  |
  \  /---+



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Harris
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More UPS Crap


Mick Maguire wrote:


> I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over
generalization
> as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment very offensive >8-|

Huh?  The Harriet reference is, perhaps, not PC. And maybe it can be
construed as insulting, condescending or many other negative things,
depending on one's viewpoint and mindset. But I certainly see nothing in
the message that even hints at "misogyny," which means hatred of women.

Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Robert Harris

Mick Maguire wrote:

 
> I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over generalization
> as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment very offensive >8-|

Huh?  The Harriet reference is, perhaps, not PC. And maybe it can be 
construed as insulting, condescending or many other negative things, 
depending on one's viewpoint and mindset. But I certainly see nothing in 
the message that even hints at "misogyny," which means hatred of women.

Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Treena Harp

Living in a somewhat rural area, we've also had some interesting delivery
dilemmas. But since my other half is a cop, we just have anything worth a
significant amount sent to the police department. You'd be amazed at the
service you get from drivers when they know they're delivering something to
a police station.

- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: More UPS Crap


> > Rodger Whitlock wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in
> common: they
> > > deliver to residential addresses during the day when no
> one's at
> > > home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went
> to work
> > > and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet went to
> work as a
> > > corporate lawyer, so nobody's at home.
>
> While a broad generalization, there is a lot of truth to this.
> However, the delivery companies are probably aware of this
> problem, as they all have a method of telling the adressee that
> they have a parcel, without actually completing the delivery.
> If they are going to take on the responsibility of residential
> deliveries, then they should also have protocols in place to
> ensure that they can complete their contracted responsibilities
> without putting customers goods at risk of theft or damage.
> Abandoning a box on someones front step in plain view is not, in
> my opinion, a responsible delivery method.
> William Robb
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread UDPug

In a message dated 10/18/01 5:18:15 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< >One solution might be to have UPS packages delivered to a business 
address. 
 
 << Sssshit, that's the worst method of all.  >>

LOL! Maybe we're just "lucky" here. City of 100,000 in an economically 
depressed rather isolated area of Texas. UPS drivers hold on to their jobs 
for dear life. In 20 years of having packages delivered to my office, which 
does have several employees, there's never been a problem. Perhaps we're an 
exception though.

Phyllis T
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread John Mustarde

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:14:46 EDT, you wrote:

>One solution might be to have UPS packages delivered to a business address. 

Sssshit, that's the worst method of all. The UPS driver most assuredly
know the names of several people at your business address who can sign
for packages, and has probably mastered several of their signatures
already.

Check it out for yourself. Look for packages left in unattended areas
when the counter person or shipping person is out of the area. They'll
be properly "signed for" and the UPS driver will have some lame excuse
about how he can't remember who signed for it (even though he and the
signor are first cousins and used to live together) and he can't even
remember delivering it (even though he delivered it yesterday whilst
the warehouse next door was burning to the ground and it was raining
toads) and how "your" people are always signing someone else's name.

I feel safer if they toss it in the yard as they drive by at high
speed, compared to the chances of actually receiving a personal
package at a place of business.

--
John Mustarde
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich

Last week my 400mm f5.6 SMC-A arrived from the USA with USPS EMS, insured up
to $500 for $38.75 from the USA to the UK. We were not at home, so they left
a card in the mail box, with a phone number. I called them I wanted to pick
the item up, but they couldn't stop it for another delivery attempt. That
time it was successful. Else there was also an option to have it shipped to
my nearest post office for a £0.50 ($0.70) fee, or pick it up myself from
their station. Not too bad for the UK I think.

Frits Wüthrich


William Robb:
> > Rodger Whitlock wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in
> common: they
> > > deliver to residential addresses during the day when no
> one's at
> > > home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went
> to work
> > > and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet went to
> work as a
> > > corporate lawyer, so nobody's at home.
>
> While a broad generalization, there is a lot of truth to this.
> However, the delivery companies are probably aware of this
> problem, as they all have a method of telling the adressee that
> they have a parcel, without actually completing the delivery.
> If they are going to take on the responsibility of residential
> deliveries, then they should also have protocols in place to
> ensure that they can complete their contracted responsibilities
> without putting customers goods at risk of theft or damage.
> Abandoning a box on someones front step in plain view is not, in
> my opinion, a responsible delivery method.
> William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Mick Maguire

Robert Harris wrote:

>Don't over generalize

I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over generalization
as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment very offensive >8-|

Regards,
/\/\ick...

++
||
 __/)   Mick Maguire |
|   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
(_/)  ICQ: 48609010  |
 \/  |
  \  /---+
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread William Robb

> Rodger Whitlock wrote:
>
>
> > Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in
common: they
> > deliver to residential addresses during the day when no
one's at
> > home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went
to work
> > and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet went to
work as a
> > corporate lawyer, so nobody's at home.

While a broad generalization, there is a lot of truth to this.
However, the delivery companies are probably aware of this
problem, as they all have a method of telling the adressee that
they have a parcel, without actually completing the delivery.
If they are going to take on the responsibility of residential
deliveries, then they should also have protocols in place to
ensure that they can complete their contracted responsibilities
without putting customers goods at risk of theft or damage.
Abandoning a box on someones front step in plain view is not, in
my opinion, a responsible delivery method.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Robert Harris

Rodger Whitlock wrote:

 
> Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in common: they 
> deliver to residential addresses during the day when no one's at 
> home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went to work 
> and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet went to work as a 
> corporate lawyer, so nobody's at home.

Don't overgeneralize. This Ozzie is at home all day, working and also 
waiting for the deliverywoman. So I am quite happy with daytime 
deliveries since my wife returns home in the evening. :)

Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Rodger Whitlock

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 11:03:57 +0200, Norman Baugher 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ranted: 

> William Robb wrote:

> > I got a reply from UPS regarding that shipment that they left
> > with my neighbor.
> > The gist of it is that they leave the decision about whether to
> > deliver to the addressee or just abandon it with someone in the
> > neighborhood up to the individual driver.

> They made that decision because it was cheaper to pay the insurance
> on lost or stolen stuff than to have the driver try and return to do
> their job, which is supposed to be delivering packages to the
> intended recipient...

Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in common: they 
deliver to residential addresses during the day when no one's at 
home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went to work 
and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet went to work as a 
corporate lawyer, so nobody's at home.

When will some delivery service wake up to the fact that they need to 
do residential deliveries in the evenings and on weekend?

As for UPS being a bogus organization: my sentiments exactly. Never 
use UPS for anything. (UPS = United Parcel Service, not US Postal 
Service)

I rejoice that I once got the better of them.
-- 
Rodger Whitlock
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More UPS Crap I Hate UPS

2001-10-18 Thread John Francis

> Here is my bitch list:

(list of problems deleted)

The main reason I don't use UPS stems from one (long) incident.

My wife was returning to the East Coast to attend the wedding of
one of the girls from her Girl Scout troop.  She had been asked
to make the wedding cake.  This involved some amount of preliminary
preparation, and quite a lot of supplies, equipment, etc. to be
shipped across the country to complete the final presentation.

We sent the stuff UPS air freight.  Or, at least, that's what we
paid for.  The tracking number indicated that the packages were,
in fact, being shipped by surface freight - we could track them
in and out of the various depots across the country. We, of course,
complained - although we had left several days of slack in the
shipping, we didn't have the extra week it would take.  UPS claimed
they had no way to correct the shipment midway; we'd just have to
wait for the package to arrive.  They could scan it at each of the
remaining waypoints, but they had no way to pull the package out.
The shipment eventually arrived at the local main depot around
midnight on the Friday - still (just) in time for the Saturday
wedding.  There wouldn't be time for my wife to do much of the
fancy decoration, but at least she'd have the cake topper, the
presentation stand, etc.  Or she might have done, except for the
fact that the truck containg the parcel wasn't scheduled to be
unloaded until the following Tuesday. The UPS central customer
service number wouldn't give us the phone number of the local
depot, so we didn't find out this last detail until far too late.
(When someone eventually drove down there and talked to the local
manager he was outraged, but by then all the staff had left).

To add insult to injury - UPS's idea of appropriate recompense
for if not ruining the wedding, at least taking the icing off
the cake :-) was to offer to refund us the difference between
surface and air shipping.



-- 
John Francis  .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  (650) 429-4427
MyWay.com   444 Castro St.  Suite 101,Mt. View,   CA  94041

Hello.  My name is Darth Vader.  I am your Father.  Prepare to die.> 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Gerald F. Cermak

And after a UPS inside job relieved my repaired LX from a box sent by Pentax
CO, UPS has now marked my house a security risk, and won't leave anything
anywhere unless they actually have someone from inside the house sign for it
in person.  That is really annoying, as I'm never home when they choose to
deliver.  (This is the same LX that arrived the next day in my mailbox,
wrapped in a clear plastic bag and rubber bands, after I started claim
proceedings at UPS and Pentax CO).

I avoid UPS at all costs after that.

Cheers,
Gerald


- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:03 AM
Subject: More UPS Crap


> I got a reply from UPS regarding that shipment that they left
> with my neighbor.
> The gist of it is that they leave the decision about whether to
> deliver to the addressee or just abandon it with someone in the
> neighborhood up to the individual driver.
> My concerns on the subject were not addressed by the replying
> email from UPS, though they did thank me for using their
> internet inquiry service.
> If anyone is curious, I have posted their email as a text file
> on my website, at:
> http://www.accesscomm.ca/users/wrobb/UPS_Crap.txt
>
> Thay really are a bogus organization (IMHO).
> William Robb
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap I Hate UPS

2001-10-18 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One solution might be to have UPS packages delivered to a
business address.
> It need not be your own business, but one with which you make
arrangements to
> accept deliveries for you. You'll need to use their address
rather than your
> own for the sender. Your name, c/o the business name. I have
all packages,
> whether postal or UPS, delivered to my office address.

A far better solution is to not support the company with my
business. Normally, I specify that shippers should use anyone
but UPS when shipping to me, but I forgot on this occassion. As
I have never had a happy experience with a UPS delivery, I think
this is the best approach. I don't trust them to do the job with
any degree of competance.
Here is my bitch list:
Goods damaged in transit (twice).
Charging brokerage fees on shipments where there were no
applicable duties (at least 3 times).
Being slower than the post office (every time).
Having a Byzantine claims department, thereby ensuring that it
is not worthwhile to file a claim for damages or reimbursement
for unjustified brokerage fees. (5 times).
Abandoning expensive photographic equipment (a pentax spotmeter)
on my front door step (once).
Delivering packages to an address other than the one specified
without permission (twice).
Failing to deliver packages to an address other than the one
specified after being instructed to do so, and indicating they
would make the addrss change (once)
Having a Byzantine customer service department, thereby
guaranteeing you can never talk to the same person twice, and
also ensuring there can be no credibility demanded of the
company (ongoing company policy).
UPS delivers, if your lucky.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More UPS Crap

2001-10-18 Thread Norman Baugher

They made that decision because it was cheaper to pay the insurance on
lost or stolen stuff than to have the driver try and return to do their
job, which is supposed to be delivering packages to the intended
recipient...
Norm

William Robb wrote:

> I got a reply from UPS regarding that shipment that they left
> with my neighbor.
> The gist of it is that they leave the decision about whether to
> deliver to the addressee or just abandon it with someone in the
> neighborhood up to the individual driver.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .