Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-03 Thread Kenneth Waller
Thanks!

Other than the weight, I'm very pleased with the combo  what it can do.

Kenneth Waller

-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha


- Original Message - 
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha



 This goes for any gimbal head. You use a gimbal head so you don't have to 
 fight the inherent imbalance/weight  of long lens/camera body.

I was completely amazed, BTW, at how smooth your 600mm rig is to run.

William Robb 





PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com



Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Joseph Tainter

Question for Club600:

I can't find King Cobra at either BH or Adorama. At BH this is the 
least expensive Wimberly I find:


http://tinyurl.com/bbksb

Will this do the job? The other two models that BH lists seem only to 
have quick release, which this model lacks. Is there any reason to want 
quick release on a lens like this?


Thanks,

Joe



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread tomreese
The King Cobra is made by Kirk Enterprises:

http://www.kirkphoto.com/cobra.html

TR


 Question for Club600:
 
 I can't find King Cobra at either BH or Adorama. At BH this is the 
 least expensive Wimberly I find:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/bbksb
 
 Will this do the job? The other two models that BH lists seem only to 
 have quick release, which this model lacks. Is there any reason to want 
 quick release on a lens like this?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Joe
 



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread tomreese
Note that the King Cobra mounts on the side of the lens.  I don't know how big 
an issue that is with the lens you bought but it might be huge.  This is an 
excerpt from an article I found on Luminous Landscape:

Begin quote The Wimberley has, to my knowledge, only one significant 
competitor, the Kirk King Cobra. I have no experience with this mount, so I 
can't comment on it other than to note that unlike the Wimberley it suspends 
the lens from the side, rather than the Wimberley design which allows the lens 
to sit on a platform. This made it unsuitable for my purposes, because the 
Pentax 600 doesn't have a rotating tripod collar. Any lens without such a 
rotating mount will similarly not work with the Kirk. At $440 the Kirk is 
somewhat less expensive than the Wimberley. This price includes the quick 
release.  end quote

you can find the complete article here:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/wimberley.shtml

I hope this helps.

TR


 The King Cobra is made by Kirk Enterprises:
 
 http://www.kirkphoto.com/cobra.html
 
 TR
 
 
  Question for Club600:
  
  I can't find King Cobra at either BH or Adorama. At BH this is the 
  least expensive Wimberly I find:
  
  http://tinyurl.com/bbksb
  
  Will this do the job? The other two models that BH lists seem only to 
  have quick release, which this model lacks. Is there any reason to want 
  quick release on a lens like this?
  
  Thanks,
  
  Joe
  
 



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Christian


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is an excerpt from an article I found on Luminous Landscape:

Begin quote The Wimberley has, to my knowledge, only one significant 
competitor, the Kirk King Cobra. I have no experience with this mount, so 
I can't comment on it other than to note that unlike the Wimberley it 
suspends the lens from the side, rather than the Wimberley design which 
allows the lens to sit on a platform. This made it unsuitable for my 
purposes, because the Pentax 600 doesn't have a rotating tripod collar. 
Any lens without such a rotating mount will similarly not work with the 
Kirk. At $440 the Kirk is somewhat less expensive than the Wimberley. This 
price includes the quick release.  end quote


you can find the complete article here:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/wimberley.shtml



It looks like he is referring to the 6x7 600/4...  So that massive lens has 
a tripod mount but it doesn't rotate?  That's pretty silly.  what's the 
point of having a tripod collar on a lens if you can't rotate it.?


Christian 



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Kenneth Waller
Will this do the job?

Yes.

Is there any reason to want quick release on a lens like this?

You might ultimately need a quick release if you can't obtain an acceptable 
balance within the adjustment available with the slot on the Wimberly. (You 
slide the lense back and forth on the Wimberly and lock the location down once 
you've gotten the camera/lens to balance).

With out the quick release, you'll always have a loose lens/camera combo until 
you screw down the lense mount onto the Wimberly.

Kenneth Waller 

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

Question for Club600:

I can't find King Cobra at either BH or Adorama. At BH this is the 
least expensive Wimberly I find:

http://tinyurl.com/bbksb

Will this do the job? The other two models that BH lists seem only to 
have quick release, which this model lacks. Is there any reason to want 
quick release on a lens like this?

Thanks,

Joe




PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Kenneth Waller
FWIW the 600 FA has a rotating tripod collar.

Kenneth Waller

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

Note that the King Cobra mounts on the side of the lens.  I don't know how big 
an issue that is with the lens you bought but it might be huge.  This is an 
excerpt from an article I found on Luminous Landscape:

Begin quote The Wimberley has, to my knowledge, only one significant 
competitor, the Kirk King Cobra. I have no experience with this mount, so I 
can't comment on it other than to note that unlike the Wimberley it suspends 
the lens from the side, rather than the Wimberley design which allows the lens 
to sit on a platform. This made it unsuitable for my purposes, because the 
Pentax 600 doesn't have a rotating tripod collar. Any lens without such a 
rotating mount will similarly not work with the Kirk. At $440 the Kirk is 
somewhat less expensive than the Wimberley. This price includes the quick 
release.  end quote

you can find the complete article here:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/wimberley.shtml

I hope this helps.

TR


 The King Cobra is made by Kirk Enterprises:
 
 http://www.kirkphoto.com/cobra.html
 
 TR
 
 
  Question for Club600:
  
  I can't find King Cobra at either BH or Adorama. At BH this is the 
  least expensive Wimberly I find:
  
  http://tinyurl.com/bbksb
  
  Will this do the job? The other two models that BH lists seem only to 
  have quick release, which this model lacks. Is there any reason to want 
  quick release on a lens like this?
  
  Thanks,
  
  Joe
  
 




PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Joseph Tainter

Okay, then I will need a quick release. What's to choose between:

http://tinyurl.com/blkm7

or

http://tinyurl.com/ayoew

Thanks again,

Joe



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread tomreese
The Wimberley II is somewhat delayed according to the manufacturer:

http://www.tripodhead.com/products/wimberley-version-2-press.cfm

The WH-101 is simply the WH-100 with an Arca quick release bolted to it.

The manufacturer offers some tips on which one to buy:

http://www.tripodhead.com/products/wimberley-options.cfm



 Okay, then I will need a quick release. What's to choose between:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/blkm7
 
 or
 
 http://tinyurl.com/ayoew
 
 Thanks again,
 
 Joe
 



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Rob Studdert
On 2 Nov 2005 at 12:38, Christian wrote:

 It looks like he is referring to the 6x7 600/4...  So that massive lens has a
 tripod mount but it doesn't rotate?  That's pretty silly.  what's the point of
 having a tripod collar on a lens if you can't rotate it.?

Not really, from recollection it doesn't need one. The 67 body has an internal 
and external lens mount and these big lenses use the external one. The external 
mount is symmetrical so that a body can be mounted horizontally or vertically 
on it. I think that's it but it was a long time ago that I owned my 67 400/4.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Stephen Moore


Joseph Tainter wrote:

 Okay, then I will need a quick release. What's to choose between:

 http://tinyurl.com/blkm7

 or

 http://tinyurl.com/ayoew

The two BH images show the old and the (not-yet-out apparently) new
Wimberley head. I suspect the clamp is the same for both, and it's a
good one, IMO. It's got channels in the bed so that the safety stops
on either end of the QR plate can slide almost all the way to the
middle of the clamp. This helps a lot with fore-and-aft balance.

I'd heard that Really Right Stuff was working on such a clamp, with
the added benefit of lever-action quick release. If your QR plate has
safety stops on both ends, as Wimberley's do, you have to open the clamp
all the way and drop the lens foot in, and then tighten it down. (You
can't slide it in from the end.) The lever release would make this
quicker and safer.

HTH,
Stephen Moore



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Christian


- Original Message - 
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'd heard that Really Right Stuff was working on such a clamp, with
the added benefit of lever-action quick release.


One of the guys (a Nikon shooter I think) at the Cape May workshop had a 
brand new lever-action quick release.


Christian 



Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Herb Chong
you must have the quick release to adjust the balance point as you add and 
subtract equipment such as flash, flash concentrator, and tele-extender. 
yes, 600mm isn't adequate for a lot more than you think. if you are going 
after small birds, you really want a 1.4X extender on it a lot of the time. 
Pentax doesn't make a decent AF one, so you have to try another brand, 
although the 1.7X AF might work, albeit slowly and not very reliably.


Herb
- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:00 PM
Subject: Tripod Head for Big Bertha


Will this do the job? The other two models that BH lists seem only to 
have quick release, which this model lacks. Is there any reason to want 
quick release on a lens like this?





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Herb Chong
i have a Wimberley head and a Wimberley Sidekick. the side mount on the 
Sidekick is a definite disadvantage in a most important way. when you have 
everything put together and make a change in the field, loosening the clamp 
to rebalance leaves the system with all its weight sitting on one clamp jaw. 
this means that it doesn't slide back and forth easily to find the new 
balance point. if you never add or subtract equipment after mounting the 
lens on the head, then this isn't important. the Wimberley head leaves the 
weight on the bed of the clamp and it is far easier to slide back and forth 
after a change.


Herb
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha


Note that the King Cobra mounts on the side of the lens.  I don't know how 
big an issue that is with the lens you bought but it might be huge.  This 
is an excerpt from an article I found on Luminous Landscape:





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Herb Chong
it's silly, but not as bad as it would be on a smaller format body that is 
less square in capture area.


Herb
- Original Message - 
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha


It looks like he is referring to the 6x7 600/4...  So that massive lens 
has a tripod mount but it doesn't rotate?  That's pretty silly.  what's 
the point of having a tripod collar on a lens if you can't rotate it.?





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Herb Chong
i have tried several brands. the one with the C-30 clamp is the old style 
with screw knob tightening. the new version relocates the pan base lock and 
reduces the weight by about a pound from over 4lb to over 3 lb. check out 
www.tripodhead.com. you must buy a plate to attach to the bottom of the 
tripod collar foot. i suggest the Wimberley P-50 plate, the biggest, because 
it gives you the most length to slide for balancing purposes. the Wimberley 
head is just about useless unless your system is balanced properly.


Herb...
- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha



Okay, then I will need a quick release. What's to choose between:

http://tinyurl.com/blkm7

or

http://tinyurl.com/ayoew






Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Herb Chong
the RRS lever clamp that fits has no channels. the ones with channels don't 
fit. i tried. without the channels, it wasn't worth putting my clamp onto 
the head. if Joe has access to a machine shop, it would be trivial to mill 
the channels, especially if he uses the C-30 as a model. i ended up staying 
with the C-30 after testing several RRS clamps.


Herb...

- Original Message - 
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha



I'd heard that Really Right Stuff was working on such a clamp, with
the added benefit of lever-action quick release. If your QR plate has
safety stops on both ends, as Wimberley's do, you have to open the clamp
all the way and drop the lens foot in, and then tighten it down. (You
can't slide it in from the end.) The lever release would make this
quicker and safer.





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Kenneth Waller

You have other choices for QR systems. Kirk or Really right Stuff.
Either one will attach to the Wimberly. Either one sells plates with stops 
at both ends that can be used or removed. I believe Really right Stuff is 
currently the only one using a lever actuated receiver. I much prefer the 
screw type - much less to get caught on something and release the lens.


Kenneth Waller

- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha



Okay, then I will need a quick release. What's to choose between:

http://tinyurl.com/blkm7

or

http://tinyurl.com/ayoew

Thanks again,

Joe





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Herb Chong
it couldn't have been a RRS one. i tried them all. one of the Kirk ones 
might fit. i have to check them out again now that they have their own line 
of lever clamps.


Herb
- Original Message - 
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha


One of the guys (a Nikon shooter I think) at the Cape May workshop had a 
brand new lever-action quick release.





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread Kenneth Waller
the Wimberley head is just about useless unless your system is balanced 
properly


This goes for any gimbal head. You use a gimbal head so you don't have to 
fight the inherent imbalance/weight  of long lens/camera body.


Kenneth Waller

- Original Message - 
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha


i have tried several brands. the one with the C-30 clamp is the old style 
with screw knob tightening. the new version relocates the pan base lock and 
reduces the weight by about a pound from over 4lb to over 3 lb. check out 
www.tripodhead.com. you must buy a plate to attach to the bottom of the 
tripod collar foot. i suggest the Wimberley P-50 plate, the biggest, 
because it gives you the most length to slide for balancing purposes. the 
Wimberley head is just about useless unless your system is balanced 
properly.


Herb...
- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha



Okay, then I will need a quick release. What's to choose between:

http://tinyurl.com/blkm7

or

http://tinyurl.com/ayoew








Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Kenneth Waller

Subject: Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha



This goes for any gimbal head. You use a gimbal head so you don't have to 
fight the inherent imbalance/weight  of long lens/camera body.


I was completely amazed, BTW, at how smooth your 600mm rig is to run.

William Robb 





Re: Tripod Head for Big Bertha

2005-11-02 Thread David Mann

On Nov 3, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:

Not really, from recollection it doesn't need one. The 67 body has  
an internal
and external lens mount and these big lenses use the external one.  
The external
mount is symmetrical so that a body can be mounted horizontally or  
vertically
on it. I think that's it but it was a long time ago that I owned my  
67 400/4.


I nearly broke a 67 400/4 because of that accursed external mount.

- Dave