[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In case anyone is looking for an inexpensive route for starting a website, I can recommend Brinkster.com (I have no affiliation with them outside of being a pay-for customer for DRiPInvesting.org). They are the only place where one can get free webspace without advertisements (if there is any other place out there, I would definitely like to know).Hi George! I also noticed that they have free web pages if one does not want to pay the $5. I met another pinholer on the streets of new york and he turn me on to this site...Just think that $5. is a fair trade to show photos to the world..regards Mickey
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Altoids are a 'curiously strong' brand of mints. They come in little tins. -Original Message- From: callum moffat [mailto:callum...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 4:02 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) sorry i meant what are altoids never heard of them in scotland/uk callum moffat __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
sorry i meant what are altoids never heard of them in scotland/uk callum moffat __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com
RE: Re[3]: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
*so maybe the suggested final mailing date should be bumped to the end of january. John **That sounds like a good idea. Thanks Rob for resetting the list. Swaps are lots of work but very rewarding, a great way to start the new year. Take Care, Chuck
Re[3]: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, Ingo Günther wrote: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? schrieb am 12.12.02 06:20:28: Great discussions! It improves us all as artists. Only 13 shopping days to Christmas..buy art! Happy Holidays to All on the list! ~Chuck Flagg~ yes Chuck, so it is. But also 13 shopping days to send pinhole postcards to the members from the list on www.rahji.com/noindex/pinholexmas.php3?random=49 I will start mailing today. Also from me: Happy Holidays to All! Hmm... this is last years list, which I thought was a one-time swap. Not that I'm against another swap (it was great) but I'm not prepared to reciprocate in a timely fashion, and I wonder if most others on the list are also unaware that it is still up. Scott -- Scott Sellers mailto:scottsell...@mindspring.com
Re: RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
pinhole-discussion@p at ??? schrieb am 12.12.02 06:20:28: Great discussions! It improves us all as artists. Only 13 shopping days to Christmas..buy art! Happy Holidays to All on the list! ~Chuck Flagg~ yes Chuck, so it is. But also 13 shopping days to send pinhole postcards to the members from the list on www.rahji.com/noindex/pinholexmas.php3?random=49 I will start mailing today. Also from me: Happy Holidays to All! Ingo __ Die Kommunikationszentrale ist da! Nie wieder E-Mail-Chaos! Verwalten Sie alle Ihre E-Mail Adressen unter: http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021123
[pinhole-discussion] no subject
Andrew - A few years ago I bought a box of Europe's Finest single weight paper from Freestyle Photographic in California. I've used that for paper negatives on quite a few occasions and I found it worked very well. I know Freestyle doesn't sell it anymore, but I haven't looked elsewhere. If you can find it, it works well. Best of luck - Steve
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Actually, everything behind the pinhole gets the same amount of focus. Therefore, if there is dust on the filter, the dust will be in focus regatdless of which side of the pinhile the filter is on. However, once the filter is clean, it is much easier to keep it clean if it is inside the camera. Another list member advocated holding the filter in front of the pinhole and moving it constsantly diring the exposure. This keeps any dust or imprefections from being recorded on the film. Mike Vande Bunt Andy Schmitt wrote: good instinct since everything in front gets focus...including any little dusties on the filter. andy -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of callum moffat Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:52 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) ive just bought a cheap hoya red 25 filter for b/w work and maybe some infra red question in front or behind the pinhole... and does it matter? my instinct says behind whatya think?
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Andy Schmitt wrote: good instinct since everything in front gets focus...including any little dusties on the filter. andy Dusties have no problem getting projected onto the film when the filter is behind the pinhole- I know this from painful personal experience! Moral- Take pains to clean any dust fragments from your filter before every shot, and, if your filter is inside your camera, make sure that the inside of your camera squeaky clean, or else as soon as you close your camera, dust will hop on your filter like fleas on a dog!
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
It really should not matter which side of the pinhole you place the filter. I guess you would have to weigh ease of removal to the possibility of lens flair and decide which fits the way you work. -Bill From: callum moffat callum...@yahoo.com Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:51:43 -0700 (PDT) ive just bought a cheap hoya red 25 filter for b/w work and maybe some infra red question in front or behind the pinhole... and does it matter? my instinct says behind whatya think? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
ive just bought a cheap hoya red 25 filter for b/w work and maybe some infra red question in front or behind the pinhole... and does it matter? my instinct says behind whatya think? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
could someone please remove soccer girl from the list so the rest of us stop getting this message. please if you want to get off the list go through the proper channels
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I use agfa premium r.c. medium weight as negs. in film cannisters and it just feels a lot thinner than ilford.regards michey
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
hi, i just wanted to share a new camera i made. i cut a polaroid big shot down to create a wide angle camera. these cameras are nothing but good old hard plastic. great for carrying around in a bag because they're lightweight. anyway, i cut the bellow shaped plastic front off using a handsaw. i then covered the open front with a piece of metal (i used a piece that i had left over from a tintype kit) spray painted flay black. drill a hole in the metal for your pinhole. i used a pie tin for my pinhole using a 10/13 crewal needle. the focal length(if i'm using the correct term) is one and one half inch. the great thing about polaroid bigshots is that you can leave them as they are for closeups or cut them down to various lengths. i got mine on ebay for under 20 bucks.
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Thanks again Omar. I agree, making an integral film camera into pinhole is a great accomplishment. I have not been successful so far, but my first attempt was with a one-step camera that I forgot to test with the lens still on to see if it even worked. I don't think it did! I am now going to start over, using a known good camera! Thanks, -Dan -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Omar Alvarez Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:21 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Thanks Dan for the positive input, The camera uses standard 600 film, which at least for now, can still be purchased anywhere. I have a few SX-70 film cameras, but cannot always find the film. In regards to the Modified Polaroid Impulse camera, the pinhole was originally smaller, but the images were dark. I had already glued on the pinhole brass shim to the camera, and was about to give up. I was thinking about all these f-stops and and other pinhole calculations, when suddenly my wife said, ...why don't you just make the hole bigger! So I took the sewing needle (what size I don't know..) and just inserted it into the pinhole and ever so slighty enlarged the hole. I know, this is not scientific, lacks mathematical formulas, etc. but it worked. I consider pinhole photography to be art. If I wanted to be like Ansel Adams I would not be using a $3 camera and a homemade pinhole. Just the fact that an integral film camera worked for pinhole at all was a great accomplishment. I do own real Polaroid peel-apart film cameras that have glass lenses and real shutters, but the images I obtain do not produce the unpredictable results that I can get with a home made camera. Recently I purchased a Zero Image 6x9 from Zernicke Au. It is beautiful and I hope to see what I can do with it. If I can be of any help to anyone trying to modify a One-Step type camera into a pinhole, please email me, I will be glad to help. Please see my Agfa Clack page: http://www.geocities.com/omar5193/clack.html my Pentacon Six TL page: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Suite/1755/pentacon001.html Good Luck and Regards, Omar Alvarez From: Dan Gerber dger...@adobe.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid Impulse Integral Film Pinhole Camera Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? List-Post: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:26:36 -0500 Omar, Nice work! You have inspired me to start tinkering with some of my one-step cameras again. Are you using 600 film? Do you know what size sewing needle you used for the pinhole? Thanks, and keep the images coming! -Dan -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Omar Alvarez Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 6:40 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid Impulse Integral Film Pinhole Camera Hi Pinholers, I am new to the discussion group, and although I have been taking pinhole photographs with a Nikkormat and Pinhole Body Cap for about 2 years now, I have recently built an integral film polaroid pinhole camera. You can see a couple of images of it: http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=omar_cam era001.jpg http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=omar_cam era002.jpg I made my own home brew pinhole with a sewing needle, a pin vise, and some brass shims from my local art/crafts store. It took some experimentation but I was finally able to totally black out the electronic light sensor to keep the camera's original shutter mechanism open as long as possible. Since I have a home made pinhole, I don't know what f-stop I am working with, but, as long as I am getting an image on the film I guess it doesn't really matter. The Polaroid Impulse which I obtained used for $3 is really easy to take apart with destroying the camera. I simply replaced the Polaroid plastic lens with a circular brass pinhole shim and glued it on with black silicon adhesive/sealant. .. Lightning flashes,.. Sparks shower,.. In one blink of your eyes,.. You have missed seeing. .. Free, BeOS-friendly email accounts: http://BeMail.org/ BeOS News and Community: http://www.BeGroovy.com/ - Express yourself with a super cool email address from BigMailBox.com. Hundreds of choices. It's free! http
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I am new to pinhole and spend a lot of time looking at the web for portfolios of different artists, this one really knocked me out. http://www.marthacasanave.com/cp.html
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Thomas Kellner wrote: Hey everybody, my webpage is online for a while with an extra section pinhole. (PCusers ) Best regards from Germany - Original Message - From: Sarah Heidt heidtsa...@hotmail.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 3:16 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] help with indoor exposures needed I have been fairly happy with my results when taking pinhole pictures outdoors but I am not sure how to figure out the exposure for indoor shots. I know this is a really novice question, but sould someone help? The last picture I tried indoors came out totally overexposed. I was using TMax 100 film and I exposed for 1 minute which I thought might not be long enough, but it was too long. Sarah Heidt _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Thomas, What's the URL? james On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Thomas Kellner wrote: Hey everybody, my webpage is online for a while with an extra section pinhole. (PCusers ) Best regards from Germany
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Hey everybody, my webpage is online for a while with an extra section pinhole. (PCusers ) Best regards from Germany - Original Message - From: Sarah Heidt heidtsa...@hotmail.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 3:16 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] help with indoor exposures needed I have been fairly happy with my results when taking pinhole pictures outdoors but I am not sure how to figure out the exposure for indoor shots. I know this is a really novice question, but sould someone help? The last picture I tried indoors came out totally overexposed. I was using TMax 100 film and I exposed for 1 minute which I thought might not be long enough, but it was too long. Sarah Heidt _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
how do i make matchbox pin holes _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
my favorites right now are a converted polaroid bigshot and a polaroid 110a- they both take packfilm. the bigshot is a portrait camera, it's great for close-ups. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
When the notch is in the upper right corner the emulsion is toward you. - Original Message - From: pete eckert peteeck...@mindspring.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:10 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) I made a 8 x 10 camera to take glass plates. It was intended to have liquid light painted on the plates so I could play with drawing with the emulsion. It's the rainy season here in Northern California. so the camera is much to slow four what I intended to do with it. I only found this out after reading some of the recent posts concerning paper exposure speeds. Thanks, saved me some bucks. To make a long story a bit shorter, I now want to put sheet film in it. The stuff is expensive. I tried taking a few test shots to get the exposure down. My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the film. Can I use them to orient the film? If you are wondering I had intended to use the glass plates to take shots of a nearby steam train as it stops at a station . I wanted to take them in the rain, so the camera is so robust it looks like it was made in a tractor factory. The train isn't running during the rainy season I just found out. I don't want a little rain to slow me down so I still want to give my camera a dunking. the guide dog didn't like the steam train anyway , Pete ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: Kosinski Family zin...@telenet.net all this left right up down is a little dyslexic, especially if you can't see, I suggest to you that blind persons are probably better at this dyslexic matters than people with good eye sight. Besides, whether you are able or not to see, when loading film (ortho film under safelight excluded) everybody is blind, after all, we have to do it under total darkness. so here is a tactile way to identify the emulsion side... the emulsion side will absorb moisture so just hold your finger on it for several seconds and it will feel sticky... this goes for paper, too You may be right, but why (IMO) ruin a sheet of film by planting your fingerprint on it. As someone already pointed it out, the notches are there to ID the film type and to tell you which is the emulsion side of it. Use the notches. Guillermo
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
all this left right up down is a little dyslexic, especially if you can't see, so here is a tactile way to identify the emulsion side... the emulsion side will absorb moisture so just hold your finger on it for several seconds and it will feel sticky... this goes for paper, too at hartwick college, where i teach, the students raise guide dogs and they are often seen in great photos... i am wondering if how your dog helps you out in the practice of photography? for example, do you think a dog can be of any assistance in letting you know when there is something interesting to shoot or when the right time is to make an exposure? haw about training the dog to use a point shoot camera? jim k - Original Message - From: pete eckert peteeck...@mindspring.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:10 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) I made a 8 x 10 camera to take glass plates. It was intended to have liquid light painted on the plates so I could play with drawing with the emulsion. It's the rainy season here in Northern California. so the camera is much to slow four what I intended to do with it. I only found this out after reading some of the recent posts concerning paper exposure speeds. Thanks, saved me some bucks. To make a long story a bit shorter, I now want to put sheet film in it. The stuff is expensive. I tried taking a few test shots to get the exposure down. My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the film. Can I use them to orient the film? If you are wondering I had intended to use the glass plates to take shots of a nearby steam train as it stops at a station . I wanted to take them in the rain, so the camera is so robust it looks like it was made in a tractor factory. The train isn't running during the rainy season I just found out. I don't want a little rain to slow me down so I still want to give my camera a dunking. the guide dog didn't like the steam train anyway , Pete ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
The notches serve two purposes, film identification and film orientation. With the film held vertically (8 across the top, 10 down the sides) and the notches along the top edge nearer to the right side, the emulsion is facing you. Dick Gifford Pete eckert wrote: (snip) ...I noticed some notches on the film. Can I use them to orient the film?...
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
pete eckert wrote: -- snip -- My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the film. Can I use them to orient the film? When the notches are on the upper right corner the emulsion is facing you. Bob Russman
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I made a 8 x 10 camera to take glass plates. It was intended to have liquid light painted on the plates so I could play with drawing with the emulsion. It's the rainy season here in Northern California. so the camera is much to slow four what I intended to do with it. I only found this out after reading some of the recent posts concerning paper exposure speeds. Thanks, saved me some bucks. To make a long story a bit shorter, I now want to put sheet film in it. The stuff is expensive. I tried taking a few test shots to get the exposure down. My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the film. Can I use them to orient the film? If you are wondering I had intended to use the glass plates to take shots of a nearby steam train as it stops at a station . I wanted to take them in the rain, so the camera is so robust it looks like it was made in a tractor factory. The train isn't running during the rainy season I just found out. I don't want a little rain to slow me down so I still want to give my camera a dunking. the guide dog didn't like the steam train anyway , Pete
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
ok
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
testing... a happy life is made up of many happy moments
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Natalie Nadozirny wrote: Is peeling apart an exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? Hi Natalie. I have been using Polaroid products for years and almost exclusively do Polaroid Transfers. I have not had any problems what-so-ever with the caustic paste used in their process. This is not to undermine any of the potential hazards that may exist, i.e. getting the paste in your eyes, etc. I always have a wet wash cloth in my working area in case I get some of the paste on my hands or work surface. If you happen to have extra sensitive skin, gloves may be needed; though I don't use them. If you follow Polaroid's directions for handling their product, you shouldn't have any problems. Have fun. Bill- Natalie Nadozirny wrote: Is peeling apart an exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Natalie Nadozirny wrote: I've ben reading this list for a while, and enjoy it very much. Maybe someone can answer my most recent film question. Is peeling apart an exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? Natalie, 26, Baltimore, MD, part-time wedding photographer, pinhead I have been told that the chemical in this pod is mildly caustic. Our old hands have thick skin so rarely to we have any problems. The problems occur if we touch or scratch or probe other areas of our body which don't have think skin. Think about how many times in a day that you rub your eyes. This transfers those chemicals to those sensitive areas. I always instruct my students to use gloves or wash there hands after tearing the print off. Wet One or some other wet wipe is good to keep in your photo kit. These are college age kids that Im instructing, I would think you would have to be a lot more careful with younger children. Chris Peregoy, 43, Baltimore, MD, full-time pinhole geek -- Chris Peregoy | http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~peregoy | http://imda.umbc.edu/
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I've ben reading this list for a while, and enjoy it very much. Maybe someone can answer my most recent film question. Is peeling apart an exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? My friend, who is a high school art teacher, has done and will do projects with her classes in which they cut and peel apart the film from the base. I have a degree in photography, and all my profs always taught us that Polaroid emulsion is not the safest chemistry to be touching bare handed. I always use caution and gloves when handling and peeling apart Polaroid films, or transferring emulsions. My friend insists Polaroid emulsion is safe and fun. I have written Polaroid and not received a response yet. I have read their MSDS's which say the chemistry can cause skin burns. My friend still doesn't believe me. Any suggestions/advice? Natalie, 26, Baltimore, MD, part-time wedding photographer, pinhead _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
a day of horror and doom, we are still breathing smoke in park slope, brooklyn..thanks for your love and concern.regards, mickey a happy life is made up of many happy moments
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: skippyjo...@att.net To: Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 8:34 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Hey guys, I'm back in the game. After not doing photography in half a decade I've started pinholing again. I'll post something soon. Please do post them. Guillermo
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Hey guys, I'm back in the game. After not doing photography in half a decade I've started pinholing again. I'm using a cream of wheat camera with 4 x 5, B+W kodalith ortho film. Don't use kodalith developer unless you want an extremely high contrast negatve. I used ektaflo developer diluted 1:1 after mixing a stock solution(1:9). I'll post something soon. Just putting the info out there in case someone needs it. BTW, I found the color negatve discussion really helpful. Thanks Skippy
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Hi Robert, for a more detailed discussion about phf contact me directly. For the other, I've quite good experience in taking phf on roll films in bw (Agfapan 100) and in color slides (Agfa RSX II). If anybody is interested please don't hesitate to conatct me. Regards Hans (Hamburg/Germany) -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 11! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
--- skippyjo...@att.net wrote: Hello Group, I have recently rediscoverd pinhole photography after eight years of not doing it. I have some old notes from school but I find that they are not complete. This is why I now ask if anyone in the group uses Kodalith Ortho 4 x 5 film as I used to. The suggested developer (ektaflo) is very scarce and expensive. Has anyone used Dektol or T-max developers with this film? I'm curious what film and chemistry combinations do you use? I use Arista Halftone film on occasion and develop with dilute Dektol. The dilution is in the 1+10 to 1+20 range, depending upon the subject matter. Cheers - george = Handmade Photographic Images http://members.home.net/hmpi/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Hello Group, I have recently rediscoverd pinhole photography after eight years of not doing it. I have some old notes from school but I find that they are not complete. This is why I now ask if anyone in the group uses Kodalith Ortho 4 x 5 film as I used to. The suggested developer (ektaflo) is very scarce and expensive. Has anyone used Dektol or T-max developers with this film? I'm curious what film and chemistry combinations do you use? Who uses 4 x 5 color film in their pinhole cameras and how tricky is it to develop at home - or do you send it out? Any feedback would be appreciated. skippy
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I would like to try ...motion picture pinhole photography I have a three turret Bell Howell 16mm motion picture camera. I can remove the lenses and possibly mount a pinhole. I know someone who has, they had to push their film-stock many stops bc (I think) they were shooting at 24FPS recording sound (standard sound/projection speed) If you do shoot at your lowest frame rate (on, I guess, your Filmo?) that will be 8FPS or translated into shutter speed=about 1/15 second You may still have to push the film-stock. Good luck! -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Edwin Gendron Virginia Tech Residential and Dining Programs Graphics 43 Owens Hall (0223) Blacksburg, Va. 24061 (540)231-5398 egend...@vt.edu
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I guess you didn't make it to the Why Pinhole show in Rochester NY. Thomas Comerford had two 16 mm films. After his showing he said he had to hand crank the film at a slower speed to give the pushed film stock enough exposure time to record. I think he said he estimates that it was shooting at 4 frames per second. photoe...@aol.com wrote: You mention in your e-mail you are looking for examples of lensless images from both still and motion picture. Do you have any examples of pinhole photography with a motion picture camera? Does anybody out there reading this e-mail know anything about motion picture pinhole photography? I would like to try it. I have a three turret Bell Howell 16mm motion picture camera. I can remove the lenses and possibly mount a pinhole. I would like to hear from anyone who has experimented with pinhole images with motion picture. Mr. Lonnie Paulson photoe...@aol.com ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ -- Chris Peregoy | http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~peregoy | http://imda.umbc.edu/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
You mention in your e-mail you are looking for examples of lensless images from both still and motion picture. Do you have any examples of pinhole photography with a motion picture camera? Does anybody out there reading this e-mail know anything about motion picture pinhole photography? I would like to try it. I have a three turret Bell Howell 16mm motion picture camera. I can remove the lenses and possibly mount a pinhole. I would like to hear from anyone who has experimented with pinhole images with motion picture. Mr. Lonnie Paulson photoe...@aol.com
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
hello all. having, i think, figured out how this thing works, i wanted to post an announcement for a lensless photography show in san francisco in july. the show opens on the 6th with a night of lensless films, and continues in the gallery throughout the month at ATA (992 Valencia @ 21st). we are still looking for examples of all manner of lensless work, motion or still photography. i realize that this is a bit early for an announcement and will repost it at a later date. i would like to encourage people to submit unusual lensless processes, and for those in the bay area to come by and check out the opening night (on the 6th). /aaron
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 4/6/01 4:54:22 PM, pen...@home.com writes: Another of the lensless processes is ZonePlate imaging. and cliche verre. leezy
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: aa...@deadlettertype.com to find other work to present, either pinhole, photogram, or some other lensless process we may be, as of yet, unfamilar with. Another of the lensless processes is ZonePlate imaging. Guillermo
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
hi. um, i'm planning a show of lensless photography to be held at a gallery in san francisco (ATA, www.othercinema.com). already in the works is a night of motion pinhole/photogram films, some still work (both pinhole and photogram), an installed camera obscura, and an ongoing disposable camera project. we'd like to find other work to present, either pinhole, photogram, or some other lensless process we may be, as of yet, unfamilar with. and hopefully expand the show outside of our small circle of working artists. any suggestions would be helpful. i ran across yr site, and thought that maybe you could post a note that we were looking for submissions... /ac aa...@deadlettertype.com
[pinhole-discussion] no subject
..unsubscribe..
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Natalie, We'll need more information. What is the f-stop of you camera? or at least the focal length? What is the ISO speed of the film you're using. What kind of lighting conditions you want to shoot under. Cheers, Guy Natalie Nadozirny wrote: Hi.I am experimenting with a new pinhole camera and polaroid film. Can anyone give me some information on exposure times using Polaroid 4 x 5 sheet film, specifically Type 59?Thanks for your help.Natalie
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
You can get pdf data sheets for all the 4x5 films at: http://instantphoto.polaroid.com/service/filmdatasheets/4_5/index.html There's also more info in their product catalog at: http://www.polaroidwork.com/home/LLframeset.jsp?body=/form/search.jsp Sorry I can't be more help, I'm using T55 and T52, haven't played with T59 yet. The data sheets have the reciprocity failure timings. Pam Natalie Nadozirny wrote: Hi. I am experimenting with a new pinhole camera and polaroid film. Can anyone give me some information on exposure times using Polaroid 4 x 5 sheet film, specifically Type 59? Thanks for your help. Natalie -- Pamela G. Niedermayer Pinehill Softworks Inc. 600 W. 28th St., Suite 103 Austin, TX 78705 512-236-1677 http://www.pinehill.com
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Hi. I am experimenting with a new pinhole camera and polaroid film. Can anyone give me some information on exposure times using Polaroid 4 x 5 sheet film, specifically Type 59? Thanks for your help. Natalie
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Please read the bottom of the email for instructions on removing yourself. |-Original Message- |From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? |[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Cathy Marzola |Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 9:15 AM |To: Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? |Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) | | |Please take me off the list I don't want anymore emails | | |___ |Pinhole-Discussion mailing list |Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? |unsubscribe or change your account at |http://www.p at ???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Please take me off the list I don't want anymore emails
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
hey there See the difference between your email mine? Mine looks like a crummy typewriter... The difference is a lot of superfluous stuff sent with the message that can confuse some readers that can't handle it. What Email program are you using? -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of che lawrence Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:32 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) plain text? html text? i've only had my computer for 1 month, i just type reply and send. the text looks plain when i type it. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
plain text? html text? i've only had my computer for 1 month, i just type reply and send. the text looks plain when i type it.Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
[pinhole-discussion] (No Subject)
confirm 939239 HotBot - Search smarter. http://www.hotbot.com
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 1/1/01 9:54:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, elenab...@aol.com writes: hey harry! Im so impressed with your work. Do you think you could guide me with my pinhole work. I have never done this sort of thing. I have a cannon camera and took off the lens. I put the cap on the front and poked a pin through it to make a hole. Now what do i do? What kind of canon? I made a body cap for my eos elan IIe and i can actually use the built in meter ;) Do you have a hand held light meter? thanx for your compliments BTW :) Harry A HREF=http://www.figurefoto.com/;Figurefoto.com/A
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 12/31/00 3:18:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, figuref...@aol.com writes: http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/panphcem.jpg hey harry! Im so impressed with your work. Do you think you could guide me with my pinhole work. I have never done this sort of thing. I have a cannon camera and took off the lens. I put the cap on the front and poked a pin through it to make a hole. Now what do i do?
[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Here is another new one from my pan cam,i just made this one today..damn it was cold out there, brrr!! http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/panphcem.jpg comments? Harry A HREF=http://www.figurefoto.com/;Figurefoto.com/A
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
remove me From: Gioacchino A. Pagliuca ar...@ci6.com Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:04:32 +0200 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
