[pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole camera idea (what!?)
Hello All, While walking through the local outlets, I've come across the one time use digital cameras that are now making their way onto the market. My first thought was, Hmm, I wonder if I could pinhole that thing? Knowing so little about digital cameras, I ask the list... Has anyone else thought about this? Is it possible? Should I attempt to build one of our beloved pinhole cameras using this latest technology? Is this blasphemous? Will I be ostracized from the pinhole crowd for toying around with it? grin If it's possible, it sort of looks fun. At least, it's a new twist on things. I'm looking forward to hearing from the group. Later, Trent
RE: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole images
Looks like dust or dirt on the sensor. Most are in the same place in every image, and some images have more than others (the dust accumulated...) Ed Nazarko -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???] On Behalf Of Dieter Bublitz Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 4:14 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole images A friend tried a pinhole bodycap with his Canon D60. The images can be found at: http://www.die-ritters.de/pinholeexperimente While the results are better than expected, we noticed some funny dots on the pictures. An example can be seen at http://www.die-ritters.de/pinholeexperimente/punkte.jpg Does someone have an idea, what these dots are? Internal reflections on the chip? Regards Dieter -- Dieters Lochkamera Seite: http://www.die-lochkamera.de/ drf-Süd-Homepage: http://www.drf-sued.de/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole images
A friend tried a pinhole bodycap with his Canon D60. The images can be found at: http://www.die-ritters.de/pinholeexperimente While the results are better than expected, we noticed some funny dots on the pictures. An example can be seen at http://www.die-ritters.de/pinholeexperimente/punkte.jpg Does someone have an idea, what these dots are? Internal reflections on the chip? Regards Dieter -- Dieters Lochkamera Seite: http://www.die-lochkamera.de/ drf-Süd-Homepage: http://www.drf-sued.de/
[pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole.
Here is another interpretation of digital pinhole. I made this image using a tiny hole in a cracker served at the artist's reception for a digital photography show I'm in. Had to keep my priorities straight. www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=digital_copy.jp g Cracker attached over hole in cardboard lensboard of view camera, 12 inch extension. Polaroid 53, no manipulation of image.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Ed, you might try the MACO 820IR film. It's sensitive to higher nanometers than the other spiked red films. It also comes in 120 and 4x5. I recently shot some in my Fuji 6x9, using an 87 IR filter. Long exposures, but very nice. And the film is pretty fine-grained in Rodinal. I haven't yet used any in my 4x5, but intend to very soon. I use a pinhole in a recessed lensboard, set for about 50mm. I think the MACO is going to do very nicely, even if it isn't HIE. Mike Healy - Original Message - From: Ed Nazarko enaza...@acumen-sciences.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Because most digital cameras are CCD, they have little lenses over the tops of each of the sensors, so are they authentically pinhole cameras? Guess it's a matter of theology. I've routinely shot several second exposures with digital cameras (not pinhole) without horrible noise problems, and you can remove a lot of noise in photoshop anyhow. Many of the infrared camera experiments in the digital world (you have to remove the infrared filter glass that sits on top of the CCD, replace it with other clear glass of exactly the same thickness) are many-second exposures. I've been craving pinhole with infrared imaging capability, difficult with Kodak now only producing 35mm infrared film. Perhaps pinhole digital is the way to go. -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???] On Behalf Of Tom Miller Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:50 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Hi Robert, Look at: http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/2002/index.php?id=370 There may be one or two other digital images in the gallery; but, this is the one that stuck in my mind. Tom - Original Message - From: Fox, Robert Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Has anyone tried to convert a digital camera to pinhole? I'm guessing that the results would be poor since digital ccds do not handle long exposures well at all, resulting in a lot of digital noise and artifacts. But who knows, it might look interesting.. I would enjoy tearing open a few of those consumer digital cameras though and installing a pinhole! Surely someone out there has already done this?? ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Pinhole infrared is easy with a 35mm pinhole camera, red filter and Kodak high spees IR film. See my page from the '99 pinhole swap: http://www.slonet.org/~rheather/pinhole.html Richard Heather - Original Message - From: Ed Nazarko enaza...@acumen-sciences.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:20 AM Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Because most digital cameras are CCD, they have little lenses over the tops of each of the sensors, so are they authentically pinhole cameras? Guess it's a matter of theology. I've routinely shot several second exposures with digital cameras (not pinhole) without horrible noise problems, and you can remove a lot of noise in photoshop anyhow. Many of the infrared camera experiments in the digital world (you have to remove the infrared filter glass that sits on top of the CCD, replace it with other clear glass of exactly the same thickness) are many-second exposures. I've been craving pinhole with infrared imaging capability, difficult with Kodak now only producing 35mm infrared film. Perhaps pinhole digital is the way to go. -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???] On Behalf Of Tom Miller Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:50 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Hi Robert, Look at: http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/2002/index.php?id=370 There may be one or two other digital images in the gallery; but, this is the one that stuck in my mind. Tom - Original Message - From: Fox, Robert Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Has anyone tried to convert a digital camera to pinhole? I'm guessing that the results would be poor since digital ccds do not handle long exposures well at all, resulting in a lot of digital noise and artifacts. But who knows, it might look interesting.. I would enjoy tearing open a few of those consumer digital cameras though and installing a pinhole! Surely someone out there has already done this?? ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Wow, I didn't know aboiut any of this specialized digital equipment -- thanks for the information! I'm still not going out to buy a new digital camera, but I will consider some older models that are now getting dirt cheap, especially used. R.J. -Original Message- From: luish m. coelho lu...@ignore.com.br To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tue Dec 10 18:38:12 2002 Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? hi, CCDs have a property of reading heat as much as reading light, since heat has also its waveform. long exposures makes the CCD surface get moisty, I believe that this is why we get those dots, they are from the heat interference. so, you need a CCD made for long exposures which is called cooled CCDs. they may be found in cameras used for astronomy (pinholes whatching the stars). http://www.sbig.com/ I suggest you take a look at this animation of a comet made with a CCD: http://user.icx.net/~mfleenor/ccd/07032000_0800ani.html []s luish http://www.ignore.com.br ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Most astronamers use digital now. So digital can do long exposures. It's just that most digital camera aren't designed to. I imagine that it takes a constant stream of photos, and merges them together. -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Jeff Dilcher Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 4:55 a.m. To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? The newer, more expensive camera apparantly can handle longer exposures better. Here is a 30 second Nikon D1 exposure (not pinhole): http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD1/Samples/Night/000902-0739-37.jpg the dots in the night sky are stars, and not artifacts! In a few years, technology will increase to where long exposures will be routine, I imagine... On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Byron wrote: Indeed. I have. I took a Logitec USB digital camera as a starting point. The images are lousy. The CCD firmware isn't all that accessible and it's fun to tinker with. Start with a cheap camera...it's less painful. Byron ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
hi, CCDs have a property of reading heat as much as reading light, since heat has also its waveform. long exposures makes the CCD surface get moisty, I believe that this is why we get those dots, they are from the heat interference. so, you need a CCD made for long exposures which is called cooled CCDs. they may be found in cameras used for astronomy (pinholes whatching the stars). http://www.sbig.com/ I suggest you take a look at this animation of a comet made with a CCD: http://user.icx.net/~mfleenor/ccd/07032000_0800ani.html []s luish http://www.ignore.com.br
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
I used a pinhole bodycap on my nikon D1X. You can calibrate the exposures by just looking at the LCD and trying again. All in all I didn't like the process or the results. It seemed like too much horsing around with machinery, and the acceptance angle is pretty narrow. - Original Message - From: Fox, Robert r...@aarp.org To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:36 AM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Good discussion on this topic. Has anyone tried to convert a digital camera to pinhole? I'm guessing that the results would be poor since digital ccds do not handle long exposures well at all, resulting in a lot of digital noise and artifacts. But who knows, it might look interesting.. I would enjoy tearing open a few of those consumer digital cameras though and installing a pinhole! Surely someone out there has already done this?? R.J. ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Because most digital cameras are CCD, they have little lenses over the tops of each of the sensors, so are they authentically pinhole cameras? Guess it's a matter of theology. I've routinely shot several second exposures with digital cameras (not pinhole) without horrible noise problems, and you can remove a lot of noise in photoshop anyhow. Many of the infrared camera experiments in the digital world (you have to remove the infrared filter glass that sits on top of the CCD, replace it with other clear glass of exactly the same thickness) are many-second exposures. I've been craving pinhole with infrared imaging capability, difficult with Kodak now only producing 35mm infrared film. Perhaps pinhole digital is the way to go. -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???] On Behalf Of Tom Miller Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:50 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Hi Robert, Look at: http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/2002/index.php?id=370 There may be one or two other digital images in the gallery; but, this is the one that stuck in my mind. Tom - Original Message - From: Fox, Robert Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Has anyone tried to convert a digital camera to pinhole? I'm guessing that the results would be poor since digital ccds do not handle long exposures well at all, resulting in a lot of digital noise and artifacts. But who knows, it might look interesting.. I would enjoy tearing open a few of those consumer digital cameras though and installing a pinhole! Surely someone out there has already done this?? ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
The newer, more expensive camera apparantly can handle longer exposures better. Here is a 30 second Nikon D1 exposure (not pinhole): http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD1/Samples/Night/000902-0739-37.jpg the dots in the night sky are stars, and not artifacts! In a few years, technology will increase to where long exposures will be routine, I imagine... On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Byron wrote: Indeed. I have. I took a Logitec USB digital camera as a starting point. The images are lousy. The CCD firmware isn't all that accessible and it's fun to tinker with. Start with a cheap camera...it's less painful. Byron ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Indeed. I have. I took a Logitec USB digital camera as a starting point. The images are lousy. The CCD firmware isn't all that accessible and it's fun to tinker with. Start with a cheap camera...it's less painful. Byron
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Hi Robert, Look at: http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/2002/index.php?id=370 There may be one or two other digital images in the gallery; but, this is the one that stuck in my mind. Tom - Original Message - From: Fox, Robert Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole? Has anyone tried to convert a digital camera to pinhole? I'm guessing that the results would be poor since digital ccds do not handle long exposures well at all, resulting in a lot of digital noise and artifacts. But who knows, it might look interesting.. I would enjoy tearing open a few of those consumer digital cameras though and installing a pinhole! Surely someone out there has already done this??
[pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole?
Good discussion on this topic. Has anyone tried to convert a digital camera to pinhole? I'm guessing that the results would be poor since digital ccds do not handle long exposures well at all, resulting in a lot of digital noise and artifacts. But who knows, it might look interesting.. I would enjoy tearing open a few of those consumer digital cameras though and installing a pinhole! Surely someone out there has already done this?? R.J.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole
eco...@aol.com wrote: I am told that it is possible to use a camera body cap with a pinhole in on a Canon camera Ellis. I've built one digital pinhole out of a broken sony s70 by taking out the lenses (its not a removable model so I had to unscrew it) and placing a matchbox inside with metal paper pinholed. since the pinhole is so close to the CCD (a beautiful piece of blue cristal) the images I get are something like a 50mm or less, without distortion because the CCD is flat. I couldn't manage to record any pictures because the camera didn't 'understand' what was going on but the video out plug kept working fine so I could see my images on tv. it was fun. want to see how this frankenstein looks like? http://www.ignore.com.br/pinhole/digital.htm []s luish -- --- http://www.ignore.com.br
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole
I am told that it is possible to use a camera body cap with a pinhole in on a Canon camera. Set the dial to aperture priority which, without a lens fitted, automatically selects 'stop down metering' and will give the correct exposure for the film speed set. The pinhole is approximately 0.28 mm dia. Ellis.
[pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole
Here is an image from a pinhole bodycap on a Nikon D1X digital camera. www://???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=digital_pinho le.jpg The camera allows exposure times up to 30 seconds. Compose and meter for F22 (you can pre-set ISO and just use what you were otherwise using). Multiply exposure time at F22 by 40, take the lens off, put on pinhole, change mode setting to manual, set the calulated exposure time and shoot. Other than the stunt of doing digital pinhole, it's kind of a nothing experience. Because the CCP is smaller than a 35mm negative, you compound the effective focal length by 50%, in effect you are shooting with a 75mm lens on 35 mm format. On the other hand the D1X is an absolutely wonderful tool.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
Hi: You could try converting a scanner into a camera. A scanner is essentially a very specialized strip camera designed to take panoramic pictures of pages. You could try getting a cheap or broken one disabling the light source. Info on making a lens based scanner camera is at http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/text-better-scanner-cam.html Gord On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:12:40PM -0800, Bretton wrote: Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:12:40 -0800 (PST) From: Bretton bret...@yahoo.com Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Hi, I know there has been some discussion of digital pinhole cameras on the list, but not much... Does anyone know if the cameras marketed for surveillance purposes are very high res? I would assume not, but I couldn't find any ads that mentioned resolution. I want to buy/make a digital pinhole camera that will produce nice looking digital prints (8x10 or 11x14) without showing pixels. Anyone have any suggestions, ideas, or plans for building your own digital camera? I use a 4x5 pinhole camera now, but find it a bit tedious and time consuming to deal with sheet film and developing, etc...I guess I could get a digital back, but i assume that's an expensive option. Thanks! -Bretton __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] RE: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
Hi, It is my understanding that these surveillance cameras have TV resolution (330 pixels tall) so this will only be good for about a 1x1 or 2x2 print. I also shoot digital (Sony 707) and am happy with the 8x10 and mostly happy with the 11x14. This camera has 5M pixels so you would probably need approximately 5-6MP. The consumer level cameras in the size range are $700-1100 but have fixed lenses and I don't see any way of converting to pinhole. The alternative would be to get a digital SLR (Nikon, Cannon, Sigma, or Kodak) and use a pinhole body cap in place of the lens. Anyone on the list done this? One issue for digital cameras is that the image is noisy after the shutter is open for a second or two. The 707 has special noise reduction that allows clean 30 second exposures (good for night photography), I don't know about the digital SLRS but that would be a consideration. Friends say that the best 4x5 digital back is BetterLight and cost $10-15k, however these backs are all scanning so there is a limited range of exposure times (betterlight goes down to 1/8 second). Mark http://www.interwalk.com/pinhole.htm -- Original Message -- Hi, I know there has been some discussion of digital pinhole cameras on the list, but not much... Does anyone know if the cameras marketed for surveillance purposes are very high res? I would assume not, but I couldn't find any ads that mentioned resolution. I want to buy/make a digital pinhole camera that will produce nice looking digital prints (8x10 or 11x14) without showing pixels. Anyone have any suggestions, ideas, or plans for building your own digital camera? I use a 4x5 pinhole camera now, but find it a bit tedious and time consuming to deal with sheet film and developing, etc...I guess I could get a digital back, but i assume that's an expensive option. Thanks! -Bretton __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
Hi, I know there has been some discussion of digital pinhole cameras on the list, but not much... Does anyone know if the cameras marketed for surveillance purposes are very high res? I would assume not, but I couldn't find any ads that mentioned resolution. I want to buy/make a digital pinhole camera that will produce nice looking digital prints (8x10 or 11x14) without showing pixels. Anyone have any suggestions, ideas, or plans for building your own digital camera? I use a 4x5 pinhole camera now, but find it a bit tedious and time consuming to deal with sheet film and developing, etc...I guess I could get a digital back, but i assume that's an expensive option. Thanks! -Bretton __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
Somebody posted this url to the list a while ago. She said it was done with a canon D30 and a body cap. http://www.meggould.net/. Or more specifically http://www.meggould.net/pages/pin1.html John - Original Message - From: Guy Glorieux guy.glori...@sympatico.ca To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 4:48 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras Jack Duganne wrote: Greetings! Has anyone seen tutorials or articles relating to making digital pinhole cameras or at least using a digital camera/digital back to create pinhole pictures? Hey! The ancients meet the moderns! ...-:)) Some time ago, I gave a pinhole workshop and one of the participant was using a 35mm Nikon digital camera with a pinhole on the bodycap. This is the easiest, if you happen to have a digital camera with interchangeable lenses or if you can have access to one. He had some interesting results, but if my memory is correct, there was a fair amount of noise on the images due to the low levels of light hitting the digital emulsion. He had posted some images on the web, but I seem to have lost the URL. Cheers, Guy ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
Jack Duganne wrote: Greetings! Has anyone seen tutorials or articles relating to making digital pinhole cameras or at least using a digital camera/digital back to create pinhole pictures? Hey! The ancients meet the moderns! ...-:)) Some time ago, I gave a pinhole workshop and one of the participant was using a 35mm Nikon digital camera with a pinhole on the bodycap. This is the easiest, if you happen to have a digital camera with interchangeable lenses or if you can have access to one. He had some interesting results, but if my memory is correct, there was a fair amount of noise on the images due to the low levels of light hitting the digital emulsion. He had posted some images on the web, but I seem to have lost the URL. Cheers, Guy
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
I played around with a Barbie digital camera a couple of years ago as an inexpensive way to experiment. I found my posting and a number of others relating to digital pinhole in the archives: http://www.p at ???/discussion/1999/msg02415.html Gregg At 06:00 AM 11/4/01 -0600, you wrote: There was a string of comments and a picture quite a while ago, either here or in the cameramakers discussion group, about usng a digital camera intended for Barbie dolls as a pinhole. I don't see any reason not to try it. If you have access to a back, it shouldn't act any different than a lens setup in biright light, at least. Who knows how it would act with very long exposures. not well, i suspect. - Original Message - From: Jack Duganne duga...@earthlink.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 9:55 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras Greetings! Has anyone seen tutorials or articles relating to making digital pinhole cameras or at least using a digital camera/digital back to create pinhole pictures? Thank you, Jack Duganne ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ _ Pinhole Visions at http://www.??? Worldwide Pinhole Photograhy Day at http://www.pinholeday.org
Re: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
There was a string of comments and a picture quite a while ago, either here or in the cameramakers discussion group, about usng a digital camera intended for Barbie dolls as a pinhole. I don't see any reason not to try it. If you have access to a back, it shouldn't act any different than a lens setup in biright light, at least. Who knows how it would act with very long exposures. not well, i suspect. - Original Message - From: Jack Duganne duga...@earthlink.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 9:55 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras Greetings! Has anyone seen tutorials or articles relating to making digital pinhole cameras or at least using a digital camera/digital back to create pinhole pictures? Thank you, Jack Duganne ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
[pinhole-discussion] digital pinhole cameras
Greetings! Has anyone seen tutorials or articles relating to making digital pinhole cameras or at least using a digital camera/digital back to create pinhole pictures? Thank you, Jack Duganne
Re: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole?
In a message dated 6/29/01 4:12:22 PM, robrien...@aol.com writes: The article on Engberg pinhole was awhile back...it is in my achives somewhere..will look. Renee Thank you. leezy a.k.a. Bernice
RE: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole?
I don't see why you can't use a body cap pinhole on say a Canon D30 or a Nikon Digital to try it out... IN fact I'm making one for a NY Times Staff Photographer...I'll pass on anything I hear back andy -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Gregg Kemp Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:05 AM To: 'pinhole-discussion@p at ???' Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole? -Original Message- From: pinhol...@aol.com [mailto:pinhol...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:20 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole? Is it possible to make a pinhole photo using a digital camera? This may not be the kind of digital image you are interested in, but I have 3 pinhole images made with a Barbie digital camera at: http://www.???/pinholer/exhibits/ Select Gregg D. Kemp under year 2000. :) Gregg ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole?
-Original Message- From: pinhol...@aol.com [mailto:pinhol...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:20 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole? Is it possible to make a pinhole photo using a digital camera? This may not be the kind of digital image you are interested in, but I have 3 pinhole images made with a Barbie digital camera at: http://www.???/pinholer/exhibits/ Select Gregg D. Kemp under year 2000. :) Gregg
Re: [pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole?
There was an article in Art News about Marianne Engberg's experiments with a digital pinhole camera. renee
[pinhole-discussion] Digital pinhole?
Is it possible to make a pinhole photo using a digital camera?
