Re: SpamSieve not found

2004-06-29 Thread Oliver Stiebing

Matthias Schmidt schrieb am 29.06.2004 um 16:40 Uhr (@361):

>At least it works for me 

Ok. It works after moving into Application Folder - even without
question, for SpamSieve.
:-)

Thanx
Oliver




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread cheshirekat

On Tue, Jun 29, 20048:42 AM, the following words from Wayne Brissette
[EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ...

>Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
>
>
>>>HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
>>>messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it. 
>>
>>Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
>>exclusive with this opinion)
>
>Ben is correct. However, I do feel that the ASCII vs. HTML/XML fight will
>at some point be won by the make it look pretty crowd. However, I also
>think the ASCII/text fight will be won, not on the desktop, but where
>more mail is soon to be flowing that is via cell phones, PDAs, and the like.

Part of the problem is that new people don't know the difference between
HTML and text email. These people just type in text, see that they can
make stuff bold or colored along with graphics and do it because it is
there as their program's default configuration. These are the same people
who usually have HTML pages automatically displayed - with all the
graphics, viruses, and triggers for email harvesting spammers.

I think HTML is persistent in email from ignorance more than anything
else. Spam and viruses wouldn't be the problems they are today without
the ignorance factor. Most of the HTML I receive from those who know the
different formats are usually advertisers who believe their products are
more tempting if displayed with graphics, yet they often leave out
important details about the products they are tempting you with in the
hopes that you will be more gullible because of flash and glitz. Virus
spreaders and spammers count on the ignorant as much as the advertisers
do. I'm hoping that the pen (text) will continue to be mightier than the
(eye-catching appearance) sword in the battle of which is supreme and
long-lasting.

cheshirekat
-- 
Sleep after toil, port after stormy seas, ease after war, death after
life does greatly please. -Edmund Spenser, poet (1552-1599)

* 867 PowerBook G4 * OS X 10.2.8 * 768 MB Ram *
* Addictions: iTunes 4 * WarCraft * The Sims * FileMaker Pro




RE: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread Jeffrey Thorstad

> Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 
> >If that's how you want your email, you probably need to
> >use a different program
> 
> This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some 
> people respond to a problem like that. The user can't be 
> blaimed for the format of mail that is sent to him/her. 

It is a 100% useful response. If you want HTML mail, PM is not the
client for you. What can be more clear and concise? I absolutely hate it
when non-newbies start whining about HTML. You've obviously used
computers, email, the internet and PM for some time now, figure it out!

> If HTML encoded inoming mail should be second class citizens 
> in PM, then PM should have the option to automatically decode 
> the message to clear text, built-in or come with the 
> appropriate scripts and software ready to use. That such are 
> downloadable is not enough. 

I'll sorta concede to PM needing to get along. Except it already does,
as mentioned every month on this board and repeatedly in this thread.
Again, if you don't like its implementation of HTML (or windows, or
shortcuts, or the toolbar buttons), buy something else. What is the big
deal? If you dislike Coke and like Pepsi, do you drink Coke every
day and write Coke saying you should make your beverage taste like
Pepsi? It's a big market, use what you want and learn what you use.

And, since I know what comes next, don't bother telling me, "I like the
other features, just not this one. So why can't I whine about it?" The
answer is, people are sick of the whining. Obviously, anybody "on the
fence" needs to reassess their wants and needs and either learn to like
PM or learn to like one of the other clients.

> HTML/XML mail or similar will 
> sooner or later supersede the pure text messages of today, no 
> matter what PM users think about it. 

So what? It's today, not tomorrow. Get the appropriate email client
tomorrow when tomorrow arrives.

> Personally, however, I prefer pure text.

Make up your mind, Mikael. Do you want text or HTML? 

Jeff T




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread Wayne Brissette

Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:

>>HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
>>messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it. 
>
>Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
>exclusive with this opinion)

Ben is correct. However, I do feel that the ASCII vs. HTML/XML fight will
at some point be won by the make it look pretty crowd. However, I also
think the ASCII/text fight will be won, not on the desktop, but where
more mail is soon to be flowing that is via cell phones, PDAs, and the like. 

But I also agree that a wonderful idea would be to have an option to
decode the HTML on the fly as it comes in, of course that would probably
require a whole new text engine. In the meantime, people can use the
existing AppleScript's as a band-aid.

Wayne

--
"Nature can survive without man--in fact, that may be its salvation--but
man cannot survive without nature."

- Homero Aridjis

Live DAT & Music Page: http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/
Wayne's Music Calendar: http://ical.mac.com/wayneb/Music
PowerMail AppleScript Archives: http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/powermail.html

Music Currently playing: 54-40 "Secret" : Goodbye Flatland




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread Wayne Brissette

Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:

>This is not useful with international umlauts.

Mikael:

The only way we have been able (we being my soon to be former employer)
to make this work 100% of the time is by using UTF-8. Of course as
Hiroaki will point out, UTF-8 is far from perfect too.

Wayne

--
sans la Musique la Vie serait une Erreur
Without music, life would be a mistake.
- Friedrich Nietzsche

Live DAT & Music Page: http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/
Wayne's Music Calendar: http://ical.mac.com/wayneb/Music
PowerMail AppleScript Archives: http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/powermail.html

Music Currently playing: 54-40 "Secret" : Goodbye Flatland




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread Ben Kennedy

On 29 6 2004 at 7:22 am -0400, Mikael Byström wrote:

>HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
>messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it.

Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
exclusive with this opinion)

Of course, the idea of Microsoft or AOL buying the IETF is not all that
far-fetched I suppose.

-b

--
Ben Kennedy, chief magician
zygoat creative technical services
613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628
http://www.zygoat.ca




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread Mikael Bystr

Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

>If that's how you want your email, you probably need to
>use a different program

This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some people
respond to a problem like that. The user can't be blaimed for the format
of mail that is sent to him/her. 
If HTML encoded inoming mail should be second class citizens in PM, then
PM should have the option to automatically decode the message to clear
text, built-in or come with the appropriate scripts and software ready to
use. That such are downloadable is not enough.
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it. Personally,
however, I prefer pure text.

PM 5.0 | OS X 10.3.4 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread Mikael Bystr

Ira, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

>If the mail is coming through as plain text but with HTML
>code interspersed, then you can select the text and choose reply to have
>it quoted back.  Just choosing reply will not quote the text.

This is not useful with international umlauts.

PM 5.0 | OS X 10.3.4 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD




Re: more html issues

2004-06-29 Thread PowerMail Engineering

Stephane Terreaux wrote:

>I receive from one person messages which source looks like this :
>
>Header : among other stuff,
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>
>Body : several lines of encoded data like this
>PEZPTlQgZmFjZT0iRGVmYXVsdCBTYW5zIFNlcmlmLCBWZXJkYW5hLCBBcmlhbCwgSGVsdmV0aWNh
>
>PM displays correctly the text in html mode, and nothing in text mode.
>When I reply, there is no quoted text.

This is probably because the message contains both an HTML and plain text
parts, the text part being empty. PowerMail can't display both parts (or
multiple HTML parts) simultaneously, when they are not alternative (ie,
content-type is multipart/mixed and not multipart/alternative).

Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering

-
   "My message database holds close to 200.000 messages. The find function
in PowerMail 4.2 returns results like lightning. Absolutely fabulous!
Even when searching on common words with results in the thousands or
ten thousands, it's blazingly fast. The "Power" in "PowerMail" is
completely meaningful. Thank you CTM-development!"
  Jan M.J. Storms, PowerMail user

 Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
-




Re: Cannot get rid of old mailserver

2004-06-29 Thread PowerMail Engineering

Robert Snyder wrote:

>However, when I check mail, powermail still says it is trying to connect
>to the old mail server in the status bar at the bottom of the mail
>window.

For scheduled connections, verify which accounts are checked, in the
"mail schedulings and locations" window.
If you click the "connect again" button in the toolbar (or command-
option-K shortcut), verify which accounts are checked using the
"connect..." (command-k) menu (or long click in the connect toolbar button).

Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering

-
   "I wouldn't trade my MAC for anything, neither would I trade PowerMail
for anything."
  Steve Tarpin, PowerMail user

 Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
-




Re: can't send mail

2004-06-29 Thread PowerMail Engineering

John R. Hopper wrote:

>When trying to send a message, a dialog box saying "A file error
>occurred", clicking on more info shows Class=file; what=100; when=1;
>err=-50.  This happens twice before being returned to message compose
>window.

This is a file related problem, but I don't see exactly what.
Is she trying to send an attachment? If so, with what encoding/
compression? What's the attachment name?
Check the write permissions in the "Temp Outgoing" folder, into her
PowerMail user folder. Is there some temporary files there?

Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering

-
   "There's a reason Mac users from different countries have chosen this
very good program. 1) It just works. 2) It's not bloated like some
other mail applications. 3) And it's better than Mail, the program that
comes with OS X. Honest. Would I recommend PowerMail? Definitely."
  PowerMail user comment on www.versiontracker.com

 Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
-




Re: Annoyances with views and attachments

2004-06-29 Thread fk

On 28/06/2004 at 8:27 PM I saw cheshirekat type:

>This message is about the Views menu and viewing options.
>
>First, shouldn't "View Options..." be listed right under the "View All",
>"View Unread" and "View Only..." choices?

No idea. Sounds like a good idea.

>Secondly, I prefer the 3 pane views of the Browser Layout because then I
>don't have PM message windows opening in different places and sizes.
>However, when viewing messages in either of the 3 pane views, I can't
>figure out a shortcut for "Delete current viewed message" and go to the
>previous or next message. If I double-click a message in the list, it
>opens in a separate window, and THEN I can use shortcuts for deleting and
>moving to the next message.

Command-Delete will delete the current message and select the next/
previous message based on your preferences. Note: This may reflect the
fact that I'm using 10.3.4 instead of 10.2.8 OS X.

>Also, when viewing messages in the 3-pane views, why are all the
>attachment options in File>Attachments always unavailable? It would be
>nice to right-click (sorry, control-click for those without multiple
>input device buttons) or select one of the menu options to act on the
>attachments of an incoming message without opening the message.

This threw me at first. I regularly deal with a lot of attachments and
thought maybe I was doing something different. I went back and checked,
and I can access the attachment options via the contextual menu. Again,
it may be partially an issue of OS versioning too. Is your mailserver
IMAP or POP?

>"Open attachment", "Show in Finder" and "Move to Finder trash" are the
>enabled choices. Is it possible to have these options available when in
>list view without resorting to the multiple-step process of opening the
>message and clicking in the attachment area?

I'd also like to suggest one addition option to the contextual menu when
dealing with attachments. For those attachments that have lost their
connection, it would be nice if the contextual menu could offer the
"Reattach Lost Attachments" functionality found in the script menu. It
seems like the natural extension of the menu and location.

Kename




Re: SpamSieve not found

2004-06-29 Thread Matthias Schmidt

At least it works for me 

how many copies of SpamSieve you have on your Mac.
I think it should be only 1.

All the best

Matthias

---
schmidt-systemdevelopment
http://www.schmidt-system.com
iChat/AIM: MatKoyasan
Tel. +31-736-56-3905
---
Am/On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:25:24 +0200 schrieb/wrote Rene Merz:

>Am 29.6.2004 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>>Put SpamSieve to the Application Folder.
>>That should work ...
>>
>>All the best
>>
>>Matthias
>
>It does definitly not! Different to PM 5.0
>Since PM 5.01, the program is allways (means: once after mounting) asking
>where SpamSieve is.
>
>Seems to be a bug.
>




Re: SpamSieve not found

2004-06-29 Thread Rene Merz

Am 29.6.2004 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:

>Put SpamSieve to the Application Folder.
>That should work ...
>
>All the best
>
>Matthias

It does definitly not! Different to PM 5.0
Since PM 5.01, the program is allways (means: once after mounting) asking
where SpamSieve is.

Seems to be a bug.




Re: SpamSieve not found

2004-06-29 Thread Matthias Schmidt

Put SpamSieve to the Application Folder.
That should work ...

All the best

Matthias

---
schmidt-systemdevelopment
http://www.schmidt-system.com
iChat/AIM: MatKoyasan
Tel. +31-736-56-3905
---
Am/On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:43:59 +0200 schrieb/wrote Oliver Stiebing:

>Since Version 5.01 PM always ask for SpamSieve. After manually selecting
>from the
>'Where is SpamSieve'-Window, it works. But after closing SpamSieve, PM
>ask again.
>SpamSieve is still placed in the unmodified PM-Folder.
>
>Greetings
>Oliver
>




SpamSieve not found

2004-06-29 Thread Oliver Stiebing

Since Version 5.01 PM always ask for SpamSieve. After manually selecting
from the
'Where is SpamSieve'-Window, it works. But after closing SpamSieve, PM
ask again.
SpamSieve is still placed in the unmodified PM-Folder.

Greetings
Oliver




Re(3): can't send mail

2004-06-29 Thread computer artwork by subhash

[John R. Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 29.6.2004 um 7:20 Uhr:]

>Are there others out there using Powermail 5 and OS 10.2.8?

Yes, me. Works perfectly.

-- 
http://www.subhash.at




Re(2): can't send mail

2004-06-29 Thread John R. Hopper

Hi, we also have the same SMTP server, and it works for my accounts on
that server.  I just created an account for her email address on my
powermail, and was able  to send mail - tried it again from hers, and
still no go.  I then started up Powermail 4.2.1 on hers, created a new
user environment and a new account with her email, and it worked.  

Are there others out there using Powermail 5 and OS 10.2.8?  Nothing else
is really different between our machines (except I have alot more junk
installed on mine).  It seems the only solution is to downgrade her
Powermail.  

:(
jrh

>Could be that a setting in 'Outgoing SMTP Server' needs changing.
>Have a word with your ISP.
>
>Brian Jacobs
>
>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:23:48 +0200 John R. Hopper wrote: 
>
>>
>>I hope someone can help - my wife can't send mail from Powermail anymore
>>(powermail version is 5.0.1).  I really don't understand.  I suspected a
>>corrupted database problem, but we tried creating a new user environment
>>and re-entered the account information and powermail still can't send
>>mail.  She has the same mail server I have (though a different account)
>>and can recieve mail normally.  The only difference is that my computer
>>is OS 10.3.4 and her computer is OS 10.2.8 (I don't want to upgrade it to
>>panther because there is a problem with printing to an airport base
>>station printer under panther and it's good to have one computer that can
>>print normally). 
>>
>>When trying to send a message, a dialog box saying "A file error
>>occurred", clicking on more info shows Class=file; what=100; when=1;
>>err=-50.  This happens twice before being returned to message compose
>>window.  
>>
>>How can we get her Powermail to send mail again?  

John R. Hopper, Research Scientist
IfM-GEOMAR/Leibniz-Institute for Marine Science
Dynamics of the Crust and Mantle Research Division
GEOMAR Geb. 8/C
Wischhofstrasse 1-3
D-24148 Kiel, Germany
Tel: +49 431 600 2325
Fax: +49 431 600 2922
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Annoyances with views and attachments

2004-06-29 Thread cheshirekat

Howdy all!

This message is about the Views menu and viewing options.

First, shouldn't "View Options..." be listed right under the "View All",
"View Unread" and "View Only..." choices?

Secondly, I prefer the 3 pane views of the Browser Layout because then I
don't have PM message windows opening in different places and sizes.
However, when viewing messages in either of the 3 pane views, I can't
figure out a shortcut for "Delete current viewed message" and go to the
previous or next message. If I double-click a message in the list, it
opens in a separate window, and THEN I can use shortcuts for deleting and
moving to the next message.

In the Preferences, I can choose to "Select next message after moving to
trash" in the "General" pane, but that's overall unusable because I often
want to view or take action upon just one message in the middle of a list
of UNread messages, and deleting that message then chooses the next
message and marks it as read. Or, when I have to stop reading messages to
go do something, I have to undo the "mark as read" action so I know what
messages I haven't yet read when I return to that mailbox. I've been
trying numerous shortcuts - have I missed these?

Also, when viewing messages in the 3-pane views, why are all the
attachment options in File>Attachments always unavailable? It would be
nice to right-click (sorry, control-click for those without multiple
input device buttons) or select one of the menu options to act on the
attachments of an incoming message without opening the message.

If I open the message that has attachments in its own window and then
select the sliver of a section for attachments, I then have a few options
of what I can do with the attachments. 

"Open attachment", "Show in Finder" and "Move to Finder trash" are the
enabled choices. Is it possible to have these options available when in
list view without resorting to the multiple-step process of opening the
message and clicking in the attachment area?

cheshirekat

-- 
Music is your own experience, your own thoughts, your wisdom. If you
don't live it, it won't come out of your horn. They teach you there's a
boundary line to music. But, man, there's no boundary line to art. 

- Charlie Parker (1920-1955), U.S. jazz musician. quoted in Children of
Albion: Poetry of the Underground in Britain, "Afterwords," sct. 3, ed.
Michael Horovitz (1969). 

* 867 PowerBook G4 * OS X 10.2.8 * 768 MB Ram *




Re: iPhoto cannot choose PM

2004-06-29 Thread gunnar madsen

Make sure you go to iPhoto prefs and choose Powermail there.  It worked
for me (today - thanks for posting the info on the patcher!).

Gunnar Madsen

-- 
Gee, Spot! Records
http://www.gunnarmadsen.com  
   
Ants in My Pants! - Winner of a 2002 Parents' Choice GOLD Award
"as witty as all get-out and unexpectedly touching, too" - Los Angeles Times

>I had already run the IPhoto Mailer Patcher version 2.0, but it still
>does not recognize PowerMail. I ran the Patcher again restoring iPhoto to
>its original state and then ran the Patcher again. Same problem.
>
>Any ideas? 
>Thanks, Dan
>
>PowerMail discussions, Mon, Jun 28, 2004
>
>>--
>>
>>Subject: Re: iPhoto cannot choose PM
>>From: "david.gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:35:05 +0100
>>
>>Daniel Ross, SJ wrote on 28.06.04 at 05:47 +0800
>>
>>> I can no longer
>>>choose PM as the email application in iPhoto 
>>
>>You need iPhoto Mailer Patcher
>>
>>>What is it?
>>>
>>>iPhoto Mailer Patcher is a hack for Apple iPhoto. iPhoto 2.0 brings the
>>>ability to send pictures with America Online, Eudora, Mail and Microsoft
>>>Entourage. iPhoto Mailer Patcher adds support for Claris Emailer,
>>>Mailsmith, Outlook Express, PowerMail and QuickMail Pro.
>>>
>>>
>>>System requirements
>>>
>>>iPhoto Mailer Patcher 2.0 requires iPhoto version 2.0. A version for
>>>iPhoto 1.1.1 is available at .
>>>How much is it?
>>>
>>>iPhoto Mailer Patcher is free. 
>>
>>-- 
>>david.gordon




Re: iPhoto cannot choose PM

2004-06-29 Thread Daniel Ross

I had already run the IPhoto Mailer Patcher version 2.0, but it still
does not recognize PowerMail. I ran the Patcher again restoring iPhoto to
its original state and then ran the Patcher again. Same problem.

Any ideas? 
Thanks, Dan

PowerMail discussions, Mon, Jun 28, 2004

>--
>
>Subject: Re: iPhoto cannot choose PM
>From: "david.gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:35:05 +0100
>
>Daniel Ross, SJ wrote on 28.06.04 at 05:47 +0800
>
>> I can no longer
>>choose PM as the email application in iPhoto 
>
>You need iPhoto Mailer Patcher
>
>>What is it?
>>
>>iPhoto Mailer Patcher is a hack for Apple iPhoto. iPhoto 2.0 brings the
>>ability to send pictures with America Online, Eudora, Mail and Microsoft
>>Entourage. iPhoto Mailer Patcher adds support for Claris Emailer,
>>Mailsmith, Outlook Express, PowerMail and QuickMail Pro.
>>
>>
>>System requirements
>>
>>iPhoto Mailer Patcher 2.0 requires iPhoto version 2.0. A version for
>>iPhoto 1.1.1 is available at .
>>How much is it?
>>
>>iPhoto Mailer Patcher is free. 
>
>-- 
>david.gordon




Re(2): Filter not working ?

2004-06-29 Thread Marlyse Comte

yes, correct.

---marlyse

 former message(s) quotes: -

>
>
>>make sure that 'stop applying filter...' checkbox is enabled - if not, it
>>will just continue down the filter list.
>>
>>---marlyse
>
>Thanks Marlyse. Er, the window says:
>
>.Don't apply subsequent filters to this message.
>
>So that should be checked, right?
>
>
>
>Cheers,
>  Cotty




Re: can't send mail

2004-06-29 Thread Brian Jacobs

Could be that a setting in 'Outgoing SMTP Server' needs changing.
Have a word with your ISP.

Brian Jacobs

Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:23:48 +0200 John R. Hopper wrote: 

>
>I hope someone can help - my wife can't send mail from Powermail anymore
>(powermail version is 5.0.1).  I really don't understand.  I suspected a
>corrupted database problem, but we tried creating a new user environment
>and re-entered the account information and powermail still can't send
>mail.  She has the same mail server I have (though a different account)
>and can recieve mail normally.  The only difference is that my computer
>is OS 10.3.4 and her computer is OS 10.2.8 (I don't want to upgrade it to
>panther because there is a problem with printing to an airport base
>station printer under panther and it's good to have one computer that can
>print normally). 
>
>When trying to send a message, a dialog box saying "A file error
>occurred", clicking on more info shows Class=file; what=100; when=1;
>err=-50.  This happens twice before being returned to message compose
>window.  
>
>How can we get her Powermail to send mail again?  
>
>John R. Hopper, Research Scientist
>IfM-GEOMAR/Leibniz-Institute for Marine Science
>Dynamics of the Crust and Mantle Research Division
>GEOMAR Geb. 8/C
>Wischhofstrasse 1-3
>D-24148 Kiel, Germany
>Tel: +49 431 600 2325
>Fax: +49 431 600 2922
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




Re: inconsistency with addresses

2004-06-29 Thread fk

On 28/06/2004 at 2:18 PM I saw cheshirekat type:

>That tiny and easy to overlook dot (eyeball?) that is for searching the
>PM address book should be changed. Every time I end up in the PM address
>book, I'm looking all over for a search trigger. There is a lot of space
>next to the "To", "CC", and "BCC" buttons, and I do literally mean a LOT
>of room for a visually acute "FIND" button. Some people don't have
>perfect vision and that tiny thing looks like a smudge - be considerate
>of those with visual impairments.

In Mac OS X 10.3.x it is 'fixed' as it were... The PM address book has a
rather large, standardized search field.

Kename




Re: Filter not working ?

2004-06-29 Thread Cotty



>1. The order in which the filters are applied.

Yes, Midi Cox wins tonight's star prize!!

Bingo. Thanks so much for pointing that out - and indeed to all the rest
who kindly replied. It's working fine now!

:-)

Cheers,
  Cotty

___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_




Re: Filter not working ?

2004-06-29 Thread Cotty



>make sure that 'stop applying filter...' checkbox is enabled - if not, it
>will just continue down the filter list.
>
>---marlyse

Thanks Marlyse. Er, the window says:

.Don't apply subsequent filters to this message.

So that should be checked, right?

Cheers,
  Cotty

___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_