Re: [NF] Mac with Boot Camp XP
I do. Macbook Pro. XP through boot camp preforms just like Windows on a standard PC (that's what it is now, of course). Very very fast on this machine. I primarily use XP through VMWare though, since I like OS X and use it primarily now. Sometimes opening a large VFP Project over the network is slow with this method, so I just copy the project and then merge changes later. (I know...gasp...no version control?!?) Enjoy! Justin On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Ajoy Khaund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Has any of you have a mac and using boot camp to use XP ? Mac's are much cheaper now in India and I am planning to buy a laptop so I thought I will take your opinion. Thankz Ajoy Khaund Neamati Road Near Bhogdoi Bridge Jorhat 785 001 Assam, India Tel: 91-376-2351288 Cell: 91-94350-92287 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if both are frozen. - Edward V. Berard, Life-Cycle Approaches --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Break campaign promises? YES WE CAN!
Couldn't even leave in the part where the Obama Campaign gives its version of the story? The Obama campaign disputes this. Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer met with McCain campaign counsel Trevor Potter and, according to Obama spox Bill Burton, Potter immediately made it clear there was no basis for further discussion, that they weren't interested in any sort of agreement. McCain and the RNC had spent months raising and spending money for the general election, and their basic attitude was 'You'll catch up,' Burton says, suggesting that the Republicans were also turning a blind eye to the activities of 527s. I mean, to me its clear that he pledged that he would take the public financing if his opponent did. According to his campaign his opponent has refused to do so. So not only are you misrepresenting the story as if its cut and dry, you pass off your opinions as fact. Clearly you know as fact what happened in the supposed meeting between Bob Bauer and Trevor Potter. Thanks but no thanks. Its just as likely that McCain is lying as it is that Obama is. Maybe more likely because if McCain today announced that he was taking the public financing, or that he would if Obama would (which you claim would actually be BETTER for McCain), he could hang Obama out to dry on his pledge to do the same. He hasn't done so. Maybe he's the one not telling the truth.. J ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Male priests marry in Anglican church's first gay wedding
John - This isn't a personal attackbut come on, cherry picking? While I agree with Bob's explanation above about Christ, forgiveness, etc overcoming the old law, it sounds like you believe Leviticus is still wholly valid. Am I reading you right? If you've read Leviticus 11:9-12 you shouldn't have eaten shrimp, lobster or crab because it is also an abomination. Shrimp = damnation? Clearly this is the same God of Love from the new testament.. If I can assume that you'll clarify your position on the old law and agree with Bob, then I'll move forward to this, a quote from Rich Mullins: You guys are all into that born-again thing, and that's awesome; we've got to be born again. You know Jesus said that to Nicodemus. But if you tell me that I got to be born again, I can tell you that you've got to sell everything you have and give it to the poor, because Jesus said that to one guy, too. But I guess that's why God invented highlighters, so we can we highlight the verses that we like and ignore the other ones. The point is - None of us are following 100% of the Bible (or even 20%, I'd imagine). We tend to remember, believe, and repeat the most self-serving bits: Gospel of Wealth and Abundance, the bits we can find against those we don't like or are different, anything that might help our political agenda, etc. We avoid the hard parts like truly loving our neighbors, forgiveness of those who hurt us, giving to the poor... You get the idea. This is why the Church is shrinking. Everyone has to believe and follow in their own way but my personal understanding of what is required of me is to love first and to leave the judging to God. J Gay priest? Isn't that an oxymoron? God says homosexuality is an abomination and they think it's ok to cherry pick the Bible. Hmm, I like that 'don't murder' one, but what the big deal with stealing ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Male priests marry in Anglican church's first gay wedding
Of course not...I don't speak for him ;) Let me rephrase - if we spent time trying to better the world through love as I think we're supposed to, we wouldn't have so much time to tell other people that they're doing wrong. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/04/martin.jesus/index.html I know some will avoid the link due to CNN...but..it sums up some of my thoughts much more eloquently than I am capable of. J On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 4:27 PM, John Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Context, my friend, context. So, you think Jesus would have said homosexuality was cool? Give me a break. It's a queer behavior, at best. JH -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Darnell Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 3:14 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Male priests marry in Anglican church's first gay wedding John - This isn't a personal attackbut come on, cherry picking? While I agree with Bob's explanation above about Christ, forgiveness, etc overcoming the old law, it sounds like you believe Leviticus is still wholly valid. Am I reading you right? If you've read Leviticus 11:9-12 you shouldn't have eaten shrimp, lobster or crab because it is also an abomination. Shrimp = damnation? Clearly this is the same God of Love from the new testament.. If I can assume that you'll clarify your position on the old law and agree with Bob, then I'll move forward to this, a quote from Rich Mullins: You guys are all into that born-again thing, and that's awesome; we've got to be born again. You know Jesus said that to Nicodemus. But if you tell me that I got to be born again, I can tell you that you've got to sell everything you have and give it to the poor, because Jesus said that to one guy, too. But I guess that's why God invented highlighters, so we can we highlight the verses that we like and ignore the other ones. The point is - None of us are following 100% of the Bible (or even 20%, I'd imagine). We tend to remember, believe, and repeat the most self-serving bits: Gospel of Wealth and Abundance, the bits we can find against those we don't like or are different, anything that might help our political agenda, etc. We avoid the hard parts like truly loving our neighbors, forgiveness of those who hurt us, giving to the poor... You get the idea. This is why the Church is shrinking. Everyone has to believe and follow in their own way but my personal understanding of what is required of me is to love first and to leave the judging to God. J Gay priest? Isn't that an oxymoron? God says homosexuality is an abomination and they think it's ok to cherry pick the Bible. Hmm, I like that 'don't murder' one, but what the big deal with stealing [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] our .NET group had Alan Stevens as a speaker last night
Familiar here in Knoxville. Great guy...was really my FoxPro mentor for the time we worked together. Sounds like you missed a great session, too! Justin On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had commitments with the barbecue team so I couldn't make the meeting. That name is familiar here right? He did *Test Driven Development with the ASP.NET MVC Framework Ya'll make tests don't you? ;- * -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] our .NET group had Alan Stevens as a speaker last night
Hate to respond to myself, but since you missed the session it looks like the slides are available on his website http://netcave.org Justin On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Familiar here in Knoxville. Great guy...was really my FoxPro mentor for the time we worked together. Sounds like you missed a great session, too! Justin On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had commitments with the barbecue team so I couldn't make the meeting. That name is familiar here right? He did *Test Driven Development with the ASP.NET MVC Framework Ya'll make tests don't you? ;- * -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Raid array disk failing? -- Now: disk drive Power?
Bad power supply? Does it boot without the drives? Justin On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, OK, I know nobody is listening, but here goes: (I'm counting on the power of the magic Send button to provide me insight.) So I figure: let's try creating a new RAID array with my 2 new 500Gb disks. When I mount them in the old server box, and turn on the power, the power pops OFF immediately. Now, mind you, these are not more disks than have been in this machine before, just different ones. WTF? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Opinions on Online banking?
I would recommend them for savings. I use HSBC Direct which I think is at 3.5% APY currently. Beats anything local handily. There aren't that many warnings aside from just reading the terms of whichever account you choose. Some have limits on how much you can transfer in and out, etc. Also if you need your money to be readily accessible then know that transfers to and from your online savings could take up to a week as well. No complaints here. J On 2/25/08, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was thinking of starting a savings account with an online bank. I hear the interest rates *can* (sometimes) be higher then brick and morter banks. Has anyone here used online banking, and if so would you recommend them, or not? Any caveats? Thanks. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] photo of Obama dressed as Somali Elder is REAL
Photo of Bush Dressed as Chinese Man Also Real - Communist? http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/china2001.jpg Just what we need, a Communist in the White House. On 2/25/08, Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://drudgereport.com/flashoa.htm Just what we need, a Muslim in the White House. You're a few bridges too far as usual... A+ jml [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anyone using slicehost hosting service?
I use and love Bluehost as well. I've used them for over a year. If they support your version of Python then I can recommend them. They are usually very cutting edge. I think they were one of the first hosts to support Ruby on Rails. They allow SSH access, as well. Justin On 2/18/08, Alan Lukachko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My brother just signed up with bluehost.com. It's $6.95 per month. Looks like it supports what you want. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:07 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [NF] Anyone using slicehost hosting service? I've been looking for a decent hosting service that supports the latest versions of Python, PHP, and MySQL and have been surprised how difficult it has been to find a hosting service that offers an up-to-date version of Python. I just stumbled across a hosting service called SliceHost (www.slicehost.com) that uses Xen to create multiple VM slices. You 'lease' a specific size slice and within your slice you are given *FULL* control over your environment (SSH, full Apache customization, etc). Prices start at $20/month, payment is monthly, and there are no setup fees. There's also a nice selection of base *nix OS's to choose from including Ubuntu and Centos. My concern: This service seems too good to be true. Have any of you used or heard about this hosting service before? Thanks! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9 FTP and SSL
If you're not opposed to commercial options check out chilkatsoft.com. They have a whole host of products that they sell as a bundle or separately. I've used the zip, ftp, email, and sockets ActiveX products up to this point. Support is great and if you need it they'll even write custom samples, although the documentation is usually fine on its own. Justin On 10/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks again, Malcolm. Now I have to keep looking for an FTP alternative. Henry ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Subselect trick with NULL
If it is Alan you can get in touch with him at his blog http://www.netcave.org Justin On 9/26/07, Michael J. Babcock, MCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Either Alan Stevens or Dave Bernhard (I thought) had a neat cool trick with sub-selects where they took advantage of NULL somehow to short circuit the result, iirc. Can anyone recall it and repost here? I looked in my session notebook but apparently didn't write the tip in there. tia! --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Issues With Event Firing
Yes, and yes. I am also trying some other things this evening. Thanks for reading this even though I hadn't updated the thread. I'll provide some sort of code sample shortly. J On 9/18/07, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin, Have you got the Application.Autoyield property set to .F.? This is required when sing any ActiveX or problems such as you describe can occur. On the refresh problem, can you post a code example which activates the explicit refresh you describe? Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Darnell Sent: 12 September 2007 16:40 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Issues With Event Firing In a new build of our point of sale software I'm experiencing strange behavior on roughly 2 of 12 machines I have installed it on so far. The behavior is two fold, but seemingly related, as the second never occurs without the first. The first issue presents itself as the screen not refreshing after a textbox input until a user clicks a certain part of the screen. There are no lockscreens and there is an explicit refresh. I have tried to add/remove lockscreens and add/remove refresh()'s from the code with no result. If it matters, the textbox is using the keypress event to check for a return. The second issue occurs as the user tries to run a credit card. This relies on an ActiveX control and when the result is returned from the processor the Finish() event should fire. However, instead it sits in processing until the user hits alt control delete. This seems to flush the event and everything finishes fine. A restart seems to fix it temporarily. Any thoughts? Anyone seen issues like this before? Oh yes. FoxPro 9. On Windows XP SP2. Brand new machines from Dell. Thanks in advance! Justin Darnell [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Issues With Event Firing
Would you describe the behavior to be the same results of an INKEY(0,[HM])? It is certainly similar. Although worse. It also is causing screen painting issues on the same form. Does just restarting the application cure it, or is a system restart required? It seems to require a system reboot. When I tried to just restart the application I was able to immediately replicate bug without going through several transactions without it. Tracy Thanks! Justin ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Windows Genuine Advantage suffers worldwide outage, problems galore
This is biting me. Vista won't activate. Its never even been activated before. (Either that or I'm typing it in wrong.) J On 8/25/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/25/07, MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The percentage of good guys versus the percentage of pirates. Wonder what the margin is? Seems like the one bad apple spoils the bunch kind of scenario. The number of OS vendors who assume you are a thief and require you to prove otherwise vs. the number whio trust their customers to do the right thing? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Dabo - 1 ????
And I don't want Ed to hunt me down and kill me, but once again, this is why I can't make a good case for relying on open source software for my commercial products. Just too much instability. J On 7/24/07, Man-wai Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/357853 So is that it then Ed? http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/358284 Same thing happened to Harbour project. xHarbour was spinned off... -- @~@http://changmw.homeip.net / v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.22.1 /( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) 21:45:01 up 12 days 23:49 ^ ^1 user load average: 0.02 0.02 0.00 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Dabo - 1 ????
MB, the code that is GPL'd will always be GLP'd and 'available'. However, most products that lose the/a Lead Developer have a dim future. Hopefully Dabo will pull through, with Ed, and the status quo won't have to be tested. J On 7/24/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 24, 2007, at 5:03 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote: Seriously thoughI'd like to hear Ed's response to that. It's a credible concern...what happens to the source code? Does it remain in the public domain? You should really learn a little terminology before you start with the Chicken Little stuff. Public Domain has a very specific meaning, and does not apply to most open source material. But to answer the question I think you are asking, yes, once something is released you cannot unrelease it. Given how MySQL is no longer providing the source binaries, methinks not! Source binaries? Are you serious? Source code is code, not compiled binaries. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: availability of embedded classes from external prgs
Interesting and on the same page, one of our former developers always made
it a habit to use the EXE parameter to call newobject even inside the
program. So then, when I have two copies of the program, say one for
testing (programtest.exe) and one stable (program.exe) and execute anything
in programtest that calls to a classlib in program.exe I get the file
descriptor error you describe.
Obviously the solution for me (with a different goal in mind) was to
eliminate the third parameter from the NEWOBJECT() calls.
J
On 7/24/07, Tracy Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had success with
Set procedure to fullpath\executable
Set classlib to classlib.vcx in executable
Dependencies of the class I instantiate need to be available before
creating
the object. I've never added the alias.
HTH,
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kaye
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:40 PM
This one has bugged me on and off for a while so I figured I'd raise it
here
and see what the peanut gallery has to say...
Every now and then I will distribute a custom report in the form of a
stand-alone PRG so that I don't have to rebuild my EXE every time this PRG
changes. This works great as long as I don't need any application specific
classes that are built into the EXE. So in general, if I need some thing
other than VFP base class behavior, I make it part of the project. Then
NEWOBJECT came along with its supposed ability to do something like this:
o=NEWOBJECT('myclass','mylibrary','mypath to myprogram.exe')
However, when I try this approach, I get an invalid file descriptor error
right after the attempt to create the object. Basically it can't read
anything out of the in memory executable. I've also tried this:
SET CLASSLIB TO mylibrary IN mypath to myprogram.exe ALIAS mylibrary2
ADDITIVE
o=CREATEOBJ('myclass')
This seems to work sometimes and yet other times fails. All in all, quite
frustrating when I need a bit of one of my libraries available outside the
context of my EXE.
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/07/17/dev-chair-geeks-are-not-apples-target-with-the-iphone/ Quote from Robert Scoble: 'It's not how many features you have. It's how many of those features thrill you. My Nokia rarely thrills.' Apple isn't battling the N95 on a feature list, it is battling it on what consumers really need. The features they'll actually use. No A2DP, no built in GPS, etc. But great E-Mail, Web browsing, a better keyboard than a keypad, an amazing video and music player and a great user experience. This is where the iPhone wins people over. That doesn't make it better, just different - best tool for the job scenario. J On 7/18/07, Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/18/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 18, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Kevin Cully wrote: I don't like how proprietary Apple has made its hardware and operating systems. Their hardware is excellent, but Apple's practices are enough to give me pause. This goes hand-in-hand with the it just works quality of its solutions. If reports are to be believed seriously flawed though as a phone: 1. two hands are needed 2. better be small hands 3. No 3G All in all i think i prefer my nokia N95 which has most things the iphone has + some extras as a decent camera (5mb) and GSM A+ jml [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
I agree with you in that respect, Kevin. I'm not ready to buy a Mac again, but I'd still love to play around with development on OSX. They have great frameworks and development tools, in my opinion. Also, I support enough Macs that it would be helpful when I have to take calls about Mail not working or lost Keychain passwords, etc. They should really have a developer-only licensed VMWare image of OSX. For some small fee, say $129, the cost of a typical Mac OS upgrade. Good Developers seem to be moving to (or supporting in addition to Windows) OS X in droves. The amount of quality software for OS X has seemingly doubled overnight. I just don't know who's buying it though. I've yet to see a commercial customer around here asking for OSX point of sale software, although some great packages exist. J On 7/18/07, Kevin Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The objection that I've been hearing is just this; if I am a network administrator, and I have a mixture of Mac, Windows, and Linux, and I get a tech support call of a problem running software on a Mac, I couldn't begin to troubleshoot it in some sort of VM. I'd have to have a Mac available to me, in some manner. Yes, this company could go out an buy a Mac which achieves Apple's goal of selling hardware, but it also creates a barrier of entry for this company. As a small (tiny) software development company, it delays me from releasing Mac based versions of my software until I perceive a real need for it in the market, as opposed to speculating that there is a need in the market. Apple can do what they want with their hardware and software and licenses. I don't hate them for it. Apple just may not be for me and my business, yet. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net Ed Leafe wrote: Apple is a hardware company. Period. The only reason OS X exists is to encourage people to buy Apple hardware. Now think about your question again. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
Kevin, I take it that this is written in RealBasic? That gives their technology some heft in my mind. I had demoed this product on my old iBook. It was extraordinary. J On 7/18/07, Kevin Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw this point of sale package presented in the keynote presentation of the REALWorld conference: Lightspeed from xSilva at http://www.xsilva.com/ Extremely impressive. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net Justin Darnell wrote: I've yet to see a commercial customer around here asking for OSX point of sale software, although some great packages exist. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
I'll definitely have a second look at RB now. The last time I was enjoying it, and I think my trial ran out. That annoyed me and I quit playing with it. Maybe its time to pony up for the standard edition and upgrade to professional if I decide to really develop something in it. What other commercial apps are actually out there? J On 7/18/07, Kevin Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it is written in RB, with extensive use of plug-ins. I must say that the migration from VFP to RB isn't too bad. RB is pretty cool. Not perfect, but cool. Between RB and Dabo (and a couple of others) there are good cross-platform development tools available. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net Justin Darnell wrote: Kevin, I take it that this is written in RealBasic? That gives their technology some heft in my mind. I had demoed this product on my old iBook. It was extraordinary. J On 7/18/07, Kevin Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw this point of sale package presented in the keynote presentation of the REALWorld conference: Lightspeed from xSilva at http://www.xsilva.com/ Extremely impressive. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net Justin Darnell wrote: I've yet to see a commercial customer around here asking for OSX point of sale software, although some great packages exist. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
There are issues with GPL and Open Source too, though. Look at mySQL. They've split their community and enterprise versions. They will not release free binaries anymore. The community editions, unlike Fedora, are actually updated LESS frequently than the enterprise version. This means that updates are actually being vetted by the Enterprise Customers instead of the non-paying customers. This is a bad idea. Its actually worse for paying and non-paying customers. And look at CUPS. Since all contributors gave rights to their code to the corporation originally sponsoring it, Apple was able to swoop in and buy up the corporation and the code. The existing GPL code can, of course, be forked, but the primary developer is now an Apple employee, and they don't have to legally release any new code to the public, since they also own all the copyright. Who knows if they will or not. I guess I feel to some extent that these are both bait and switch tactics'free software...' I mean, if I'd written a program which used mySQL I'd be fairly angry that I either needed to pay for a supported version or build my own binaries from scratch. That's not what they were advertising a year ago. They just wanted people to use it, and now that they are using it...they want to charge them. Technically its their right. The GPL doesn't demand that they release binaries. But its really more in the spirit of FOSS that these things don't happen. J On 7/18/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 18, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Mike Wohlrab wrote: Well with Linux, you have to use their file format. Wrong. There is always something proprietary to the software/ hardware that makes it more so that you use their stuff verses someone else's stuff. Different != Proprietary. With open source, they are trying to sway people over to their stuff, largely by getting the help of the public so they can spread out the cost of doing business/ creating their product and with it being free, they will attract the attention of the public. Most likely when they get enough people looking and using their product, they will start charging just like how Linspire charges for their versions of Linux thus maximizing profits. Sorry, but that's a complete load of crap, since once you release something, you can't later take it back. Linspire charges for their stuff, but that's because they offer a service that is worth something to people. Red Hat charges for support, too. Nothing says you can't make money off of open source. But to call it proprietary is flat-out wrong. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
So if Apple hired Paul and I, nobody could enhance Dabo? That's absurd. I understand that someone could, but would they? If the two lead developers walked away, would anyone be as passionate or involved enough to pick up the project? My opinion is that the answer is probably no. Enterprise customers also get high-level support. In other words, they are paying for the support to make sure that all the latest and greatest stuff works. When that stuff is working consistently, it is migrated to the community edition. I understand this too. That wasn't my point. You SHOULD pay for support. My point was, if you're running an open source project, and previously accepted free code from the community, this seems like you're turning your back on them to start treating them like second class citizens. These are the same people who evangelized your software and got it into mainstream use to start with. I get it, perfectly legal. Not necessarily the thing that gives you warm fuzzies about open source, though. Did you somehow interpret the word freedom as guaranteed immediate updates and support for all eternity? No, but everyone brags about the community spirit of open source. Both of these moves are not community oriented. J On 7/18/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 18, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Justin Darnell wrote: There are issues with GPL and Open Source too, though. Did anyone claim that they, or anything else, was perfect? Look at mySQL. They've split their community and enterprise versions. They will not release free binaries anymore. The community editions, unlike Fedora, are actually updated LESS frequently than the enterprise version. This means that updates are actually being vetted by the Enterprise Customers instead of the non-paying customers. This is a bad idea. Its actually worse for paying and non-paying customers. Enterprise customers also get high-level support. In other words, they are paying for the support to make sure that all the latest and greatest stuff works. When that stuff is working consistently, it is migrated to the community edition. And look at CUPS. Since all contributors gave rights to their code to the corporation originally sponsoring it, Apple was able to swoop in and buy up the corporation and the code. The existing GPL code can, of course, be forked, but the primary developer is now an Apple employee, and they don't have to legally release any new code to the public, since they also own all the copyright. Who knows if they will or not. So if Apple hired Paul and I, nobody could enhance Dabo? That's absurd. I guess I feel to some extent that these are both bait and switch tactics'free software...' Free refers to freedom. Anything released under the GPL or other open source licenses is still free for you to develop and use as you wish. Let's take your complaint about MySQL. They released several versions under GPL. They later released other versions under commercial licenses. Did that change anything that was released under GPL? Not at all. You still have every right to use and modify that code that you always did. Did you somehow interpret the word freedom as guaranteed immediate updates and support for all eternity? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] For those who hate the iPhone
They would indeed be motivated enough to look at the code, track down the bug and fix it. I agree, they would. However, would they actually take on the whole project and start adding features? Or would it just feature freeze forever with random bug fixes from the community and eventually vanish into obscurity? If you were a regular Dabo user, you would feel insulted by this? You would feel like a 'second-class citizen'? What you described is fine. You're not purposefully stalling your non-paying clients on buggy builds of Dabo as to make them pay for the latest and greatest. Here's a related blog entry from a MySQL expert: http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/05/14/breakdown-in-mysql-enterprise-process/ What would give you warm fuzzies? They should continue the unspoken bond they previously had with the community. Everyone gets the same release. If you need support you pay for it, but they shouldn't keep you from using the latest and greatest just because you don't pay for support. The communities are stronger than ever. Googling mysql free binaries and finding that 4 of the 5 top hits are people talking about the change tells me the community isn't happy about it. On 7/18/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 18, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Justin Darnell wrote: So if Apple hired Paul and I, nobody could enhance Dabo? That's absurd. I understand that someone could, but would they? If the two lead developers walked away, would anyone be as passionate or involved enough to pick up the project? My opinion is that the answer is probably no. That's probably correct. Now consider someone who used Dabo for their application, and a year later found that the code to talk to the PostgreSQL backend had a bug. They would indeed be motivated enough to look at the code, track down the bug and fix it. Compare that to, oh, I don't know... Visual FoxPro. How are you going to fix bugs you may find in that? Enterprise customers also get high-level support. In other words, they are paying for the support to make sure that all the latest and greatest stuff works. When that stuff is working consistently, it is migrated to the community edition. I understand this too. That wasn't my point. You SHOULD pay for support. My point was, if you're running an open source project, and previously accepted free code from the community, this seems like you're turning your back on them to start treating them like second class citizens. These are the same people who evangelized your software and got it into mainstream use to start with. That's a pretty backwards way to look at it. Let me see if I understand you correctly. I currently write and support Dabo. Anyone can download it and use it for free. But I need to pay my bills, so I start accepting paying customers who ask for specific changes that they need for their apps. I focus on them, since they're paying the bills. I then take all the changes I made to the framework as pass them on to the rest of the Dabo community. If you were a regular Dabo user, you would feel insulted by this? You would feel like a 'second-class citizen'? I get it, perfectly legal. Not necessarily the thing that gives you warm fuzzies about open source, though. What would give you warm fuzzies? Did you somehow interpret the word freedom as guaranteed immediate updates and support for all eternity? No, but everyone brags about the community spirit of open source. Both of these moves are not community oriented. Again, a backwards way of looking at things. They are making money and helping to ensure that the developers are financially able to continue to work on their projects. The communities are stronger than ever. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Plan B; Kill 2 million babies A YEAR, in complete privacy
I'm not saying the article is right or wrong, but let me share a quote from another article, appropriately titled Plan B: Ignore the Science? Scientists say the hubbub is hogwash because studies have shown that the progestin hormone in Plan B prevents ovulation but does not affect a fertilized egg, and therefore cannot be considered abortion. People mix up emergency contraception with abortion, and it is really inaccurate, said Regine Sitruk-Ware, executive director of product research and development at The Population Council, a nonprofit that conducts research on reproductive science, including birth control and abortion procedures. Political opponents of abortion want to prevent access to emergency contraception on the basis that it may prevent implantation, and therefore would be a sort of early abortive. This is not the case. Source: http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/05/67432 J On 7/16/07, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 16 July 2007 08:46, Derek Kalweit wrote: http://www.startribune.com/484/story/1300414.html With that kind of logic, 13-year-olds are killing millions of babies Hi Derek! Sperm cells are not babies, yanked or otherwise. The egg is already fertilized - this happens almost instantly upon intercourse if it is going to happen, now the embryo has all the human chromosomes. What does that make it, a fish? Plan B is just a fancy name for early abortion. Logic? Imagine a 55 gallon drum. Inside the drum is a bunch of dead fish and maybe a live baby. Is it OK for you to fire a gun through the drum without looking to see if it is all fish and no baby or should you check and see if there is a baby before firing? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] God Hates iPod
It could be the iPodsor stupid people jogging in a thunder storm. I'm sure the next story will be: A man died today while listening to his iPod and bathing with a toaster in his New Jersey home. Doctors say the presence of an iPod made bathing with a plugged in toaster more dangerous. J On 7/12/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://asia.news.yahoo.com/070711/ap/d8qakrd01.html [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] ATT and plan specifics with iPhone
Most of this guys arguments here have already been debunked. Inbound calls not being charged is fairly standard in other countries, but here with cell phones it mostly works the other way, except for some of the smaller companies, as far as I know. For an expert, this guy doesn't know that most of these things are completely standard practice. I will highlight the ones that are just plain wrong (I bought an iPhone.) 12) E-mail attachments work great. PDFs, Excel, Word, etc, are all viewable for me. 15) This applies to plans that include some free WiFi connections at ATT/Cingular Hotspots, it has nothing to do with the actual number of connections to YOUR networks. I don't even think this is applicable to iPhone, as, as far as I know, it doesn't include this free service. I'd say all his other points are completely typical and normal for cell phone carriers. J On 7/11/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: I don't pay for inbound calls on my cell, regardless of where they originate. What service do you have? I've had the two biggest US carriers (Verizon and Cingular/ATT), and they both do that. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using a handheld wireless device?
Symbol PPT8800 is my preferred device. Fairly rugged. PocketPC 2003, with .NET Compact Framework, and the controls from Symbol to handle the barcode scanner. Then I link it with a .Net web service talking to our FoxPro tables. Neat stuff. Back to the PPT8800, its a nice device, with a great barcode scanner on it, which has been our issue with our devices. (LED Scanners instead of laser.) Justin On 6/27/07, Mike Wohlrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP Doesn't have to be armour plated I don't think, but reasonably rugged would be nice... SNIP Rugged enough to withstand a two ton nuclear blast? Try this site, they look like they may have what you are looking for. http://www.barcodesinc.com/ Computer Technology Solutions Mike Wohlrab President 585-944-3823 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.MikeWohlrab.com FTP://MikeWohlrab.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Thunderbird quoting
Ken, http://kb.mozillazine.org/Quote_only_selected_text_when_replying_-_Thunderbird I'm surprised there's not an addon to do this yet. Its also not added/corrected in the 2.0 RC1 version I'm using. Justin On 4/18/07, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi - -- - -- - -- - I have started to use TB on my Linux machine. Anybody know if there is a setting which quotes highlighted text? I can't find it, only quote all of the prior message or none of it. Ken [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Thunderbird quoting
Following it and feeling stupid. I just skipped the bottom of the page. Glad you found what you needed! Justin On 4/18/07, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Justin Darnell wrote: there's not an addon to do this yet Thanks to you, too -- if you are following the thread, Leland got to your link before me, and found QuickQuote. I installed it and it works great. Based on a 2-minute test, it is highly recommended. Ken [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Difference in table structures?
I need suggestion on comparing table structures in databases. Is there a tool that does this? So, we have two similar databases, same tables, but some tables have had changes. They weren't tracked properly, now I need a diff of the tables in both databases. I know there has to be a pretty simple solution to this, but I've never done it before. TIA, Justin ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] -- Tech Analysis: Windows Vista Sucks Performance
I have actually noticed many operating system functions being faster in Vista. Alt-tabbing out of 3d games is instant, and alt-tabbing back in, also instant. This used to take awhile. Searching is faster (if you're not already using something like Google Desktop) but completely and utterly difficult to configure the way you want it to work. I do prefer the new start menu, which reminds me of Quicksilver/Spotlight on Mac OS X. Starting Visual Studio 2005 is a ton faster. Generally starting applications is faster, but I noticed especially on VS2005. Starting up from 'sleep' is faster. Copying files seems slower. A lot of other stuff seems slower just because of resource considerations. The OS does now take up 600 megs of RAM on my machine by itself. Which means, to be running FoxPro, VS, FireFox, Thunderbird, iTunes, SQL Server Express, etcyou probably need two gigs to leave wiggle room. I haven't done a direct comparison to XP on this machine. Just my general sense and feeling of things. On 4/9/07, Virgil Bierschwale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya'll all know I'm a staunch supporter of Microsoft... But here lately, I have a Acer aspire 5670 laptop which I had upgraded from xp home to xp professional back when I bought it. Starting last year, I attempted 5 times to install the vista beta that comes with my action pack subscription. No go any time... However I hadn't given up yet, so in the new Jan 07 package there was a windows vista UPGRADE. Said to myself. Self, one more time won't hurt, yeah right. Finally figured it was a problem with Acer drivers, so I reinstalled from the restore cd (thank god I had one) This put the Acer back like new with XP HOME and a traditional format (FAT 32) So I try again and it looks like it is finally working and then it says this upgrade cannot be installed on a FAT 32 formatted drive and I finally say to myself, self, Microsoft has really really blown it this time. Oh well, what did I do with that Linux cd and wheres that PHP / MySQL book I bought.. Virgil Bierschwale Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate (830) 329-6774 Cell (830) 864-4799 Fax (830) 864-4726 Home http://www.bierschwale.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:12 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] -- Tech Analysis: Windows Vista Sucks Performance On 4/9/07, Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As suspected, Vista hampered .Net's performance as well. Wassa matta? Did they write it in DotNet or something? Yuck, yuck... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] -- Tech Analysis: Windows Vista Sucks Performance
For the record, I'm not defending it. I just have found the good in the cards I've been dealt. J On 4/9/07, MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Darnell wrote: snipped A lot of other stuff seems slower just because of resource considerations. The OS does now take up 600 megs of RAM on my machine by itself. Which means, to be running FoxPro, VS, FireFox, Thunderbird, iTunes, SQL Server Express, etcyou probably need two gigs to leave wiggle room. Wow...2 GB...just to have wiggle room! Where's my copy of DOS 3.11? g -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Desktop Tower Defense
I've been addicted for awhile. Just got 5032. Thanks for starting the group. J On 4/9/07, Garrett Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't click this link, if you value your productivity. http://www.handdrawngames.com/DesktopTD But if you do click it, and you make it onto the high score list, feel free to add yourself to the FoxFiends group I just created. :-) --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Sending mail from VFP w/o mailto
Whil, We use an ActiveX control from Chilkat Software http://www.chilkatsoft.com/. Specifically, we use it for some software that keeps a mailing list for a store, as well as for error reporting. We also use the FTP and ZIP ActiveXes for various other things. I can't say enough for how well things work and how well everything is supported and documented. He's even written examples for me (multi-threaded FTP in .NET). The price is 289 but you get all the libraries in .NET, ActiveX and C++ library format. For the mail component only is, I think, 99 dollars. I know there are other solutions that are free, but for me it was money well spent to have something supported. Check them out. J On 4/5/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 5, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote: Door #3: Incorporate a third party utility such as BLAT (which I've seen talked about here oodles) or ipstuff. BLAT! Just do it. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] wireless scanners
I use Symbol scanners. http://www.symbol.com/products/mobile_computers/mobile_computers.html Specifically MC50 and the PPT880. I have a .NET application on the handheld and a .NET web service on the server accessing the VFP data through OLEDB. This works like a charm, but may not be exactly what you're talking about. Justin ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Updating stored procs without VFP IDE?
Is it possible to update or add a stored procedure on a deployed dbc without using the IDE? I know the MODI PROCEDURE isn't available in the runtime, but it looked like I could just USE the dbc and edit a value there. That didn't work, though, after I had saved and reopened the database. Thanks! Justin ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Updating stored procs without VFP IDE?
Score, thank you good sir. Justin On 2/25/07, MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Darnell wrote: Is it possible to update or add a stored procedure on a deployed dbc without using the IDE? I know the MODI PROCEDURE isn't available in the runtime, but it looked like I could just USE the dbc and edit a value there. That didn't work, though, after I had saved and reopened the database. Thanks! Justin Some son-of-a-* uploaded something awhile back that did just that...or so he said. Look for Update Stored Procedures in Client's DBC: http://leafe.com/dls/vfp g -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The nicest thing ever written about Vista...
Actually, yes, or, at least it looks that way. http://www.networkcomputing.com/channels/personaltechnology/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196902207 On 2/25/07, MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joel N. Fischoff wrote: those screens asking to give permission to myself for everything are getting to my nerves. You are coming to a sad realization. Cancel or Allow. Heh. Those Mac commercials sting hard right where it hurts. ;) But reallyhow much impact/affect do they really have? Are Mac sales up and PC (Winblows) sales down? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
SELECT with SUM() - help!
I'm trying to write one select statement to pull all of the data I
need for a particular report. The first part of the statement pulls
various things from a transactions table. It works fine. As soon as
I add the code to access the inventory table as well, though, I end up
with numbers that are way too large.
I know I'm probably missing something obvious, but here are the select
statements below if anyone has any insight. The first is just
transactions table, and seemingly works. The second is the trouble
maker.
The goal is to sum all the listed transaction table fields for the
given date, but the get the current total of inventory value,
regardless of any date constraints on inventory.
SELECT SUM(total) as Total, SUM(tax) as Tax, SUM(subtotal) as
Subtotal, SUM(cost) as COGS, (SUM(total) -
SUM(ext_cost))/SUM(total)*100 as GP FROM trx where trx.date =
CTOD('09/30/06')
SELECT SUM(total) as Total, SUM(tax) as Tax, SUM(subtotal) as
Subtotal, SUM(cost) as COGS, (SUM(total) -
SUM(ext_cost))/SUM(total)*100 as GP,
SUM(inventory.onhand*inventory.avg_cost) FROM trx, inventory where
trx.date = CTOD('09/30/06')
Thanks in advance!
Justin
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: connect to sql server express 2005
Sound like a few things going on. I think you'll certainly need the 'SQL Native Client' driver on all of the machines you want to connect with. Also, if you haven't configured your SQL Server instance to accept outside connection, you'll need to do that in the SQL Surface Area Configuration program. By default it will only allow local connections. Does that sound like it could be the problem? I haven't messed with it much, but the Surface Area Configuration was my stumbling block. Justin On 2/22/07, Judith Barer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have installed sql server 2005 express on my local machine. This is my first time using sql server. I set up a connection in a vfp 8.0 database to a database sql server that works on my own machine. However when I try to connect to the sql server database from another machine I get an error. I am using windows authentication. I would like to change it to use sql server authentication but it does not seem to work. The code for my connection string is CREATE CONNECTION teststark CONNSTRING +; 'Driver=SQL Native Client;' +; 'SERVER=.\SQLExpress;' +; 'TRUSTED_CONNECTION=YES;' +; 'DATABASE=teststark;' +; 'NETWORK=DBMSSOCN' When I view the connection code it the database it is as follows Driver=SQL Native Client;SERVER=.\SQLExpress;TRUSTED_CONNECTION=YES;DATABASE=teststark;NETWORK=DBMSSOCN I can connect from my machine but not from another user's machine. I have another machine that has vfp 8.0 installed and when I open the project and try verifying the connection I get the following error data source name not found and no default driver specified So I thought maybe I had to create the odbc client but the sql native client is not installed on that machine and I could not connect to the sql server 2005 using sql server driver. ( it was not brought up in the list of databases) Does anyone know what is going on? Thanks Judith Barer Star-K Kosher Certification 122 Slade Ave Baltimore, MD 21208 410 484 4110 Fax 410 6539293 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Mount an ISO CD image as a virtual CD/DVD drive?
DaemonTools are okay, but you need to watch the setup options for'extras'. The unsupported Microsoft tool is my favorite. Its a little more difficult to use, but...given 15 minutes its a snap. Free and spyware free. Justin On 2/21/07, Rick Quilhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might try Nero. Rick Q -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:04 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [NF] Mount an ISO CD image as a virtual CD/DVD drive? Any suggestions on a utility to mount an ISO CD image file as a virtual CD/DVD drive vs. burning throw-away CD/DVD's everytime I need to install from a downloaded ISO file? There appear to be a lot of options for Linux - I'm looking for a Windows 2000/XP solution. I've been googling and found: 1. Daemon Tools (with warning to avoid) http://www.daemon-tools.cc/dtcc/download.php?mode=ViewCategorycatid=5 2. A free, unsupported MS utility http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/b/6/7b6abd84-7841-4978-96f5-bd58df 02efa2/winxpvirtualcdcontrolpanel_21.exe 3. ISO Buster ($30) http://www.smart-projects.net/cdrecovery.php Any one have any suggestions on what to use or avoid - or should I just burn a damn CD and be done with it ;) Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Do laptop batteries wear out faster in the cold?
How old is the battery? My iBook G4 battery would work for 3 - 5 hours depending on the use before going dead on me, but I also had to replace the battery after the first year. Justin On 2/5/07, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So there I am, in the basement, wearing my four pair o' corduroys, dinking around on the wind trainer. I have my Mac set up on a stand in front of the bike to watch whatever trash Netflix has heaved my way recently. I've been getting about 70-75 minutes of DVD playing time. Today it bailed on me at 65 minutes. The only difference (battery was fully charged from last night) is that it's about 15F in the basement this morning, up from it's normal 27 or 28. (Outside it's 12 below, F. All Milwaukee schools were closed. The wimps.) Of course, I didn't find out that everyone else was going to be sleeping in until after I had gotten up at oh-dark-freezin'-thirty, stretched, dressed, and lugged everything down to the basement. Ugh. Should I be getting more than 75 minutes on a Mac PowerBook G4 battery for playing DVD? Walter Mossberg keeps boasting about how he gets 3 or 5 hours on his 'endurance' tests, but I suspect that he falls asleep halfway through his tests, and doesn't realize that the battery is hibernating on him without him knowing it. He's really old, you know. Same high school graduating class as Ted, last I heard. Whil [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
West Wind Web Store .Net
Any opinions on this webstore or other .NET web stores? Looking to integrate with our point of sale system. J ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
Almost five million aborted fetuses? Do you want your taxes raised to take care of them in foster homes? Oh the hard decisions a Compassionate Conservative must make. I honestly don't support abortions, but do you BELIEVE that you will be held responsible in your version of heaven or hell for the mistakes others have made? Why push your personal life and beliefs on others? Everyone answers for themselves in the end... Justin On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh they aren't THAT bad! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 2:32 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil That is true. Do Democrats even have a soul? --- john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The good thing about these abortions is that most of them are democrats!G John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:51 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Helio, ... It is estimated that up to 50% of all fertilized eggs die and are lost (aborted) spontaneously, usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Perhaps Madigan and Pete should go dumpster diving for freshly discarded feminine products to see if there are any fertilized eggs they can rescue. I hear womb transplants are in test, and artificial wombs are being researched. Once we are good to go we can outfit these guys with their own wombs so they can rescue at least one unwanted embryo each year. Kristyne McDaniel [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
So then the question is...is it your place to fix the world? And if so, why are you sitting where you are and not out changing things? Why weren't you in Iraq before we started a 'War on Terror'? (i hope you weren't, or I'll feel like a realyou get the point) I guess what I'm saying is, you're right, there's a lot of things I don't support, but I don't feel a personal responsibility to fix everything in the world. Living my life as my religion dictates is hard enough, without trying to correct everyone else. J On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't support abortions either, nor did I support Saddam slaughtering millions. I wouldn't have supported Hitler or Stalin in their purges either. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Darnell Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 8:55 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Almost five million aborted fetuses? Do you want your taxes raised to take care of them in foster homes? Oh the hard decisions a Compassionate Conservative must make. I honestly don't support abortions, but do you BELIEVE that you will be held responsible in your version of heaven or hell for the mistakes others have made? Why push your personal life and beliefs on others? Everyone answers for themselves in the end... Justin On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh they aren't THAT bad! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 2:32 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil That is true. Do Democrats even have a soul? --- john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The good thing about these abortions is that most of them are democrats!G John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:51 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Helio, ... It is estimated that up to 50% of all fertilized eggs die and are lost (aborted) spontaneously, usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Perhaps Madigan and Pete should go dumpster diving for freshly discarded feminine products to see if there are any fertilized eggs they can rescue. I hear womb transplants are in test, and artificial wombs are being researched. Once we are good to go we can outfit these guys with their own wombs so they can rescue at least one unwanted embryo each year. Kristyne McDaniel [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
I knew you were an officer. I'm sure you've done plenty of good and I respect you and your profession and thank you for your service. However, in your theory of policing the world and being responsible for every bad thing that happens, are you sure you've done enough? Thanks for the discussion too. I've really enjoyed it. I really like hearing the other side of these things, as you've certainly provided me some food for thought. J On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've done my time fixing the world, or so I thought (32 years of Policing). I'm going back to the world fixing business some time in the next week or so. As for religion, I don't beat people over the head with my Bible, but I don't mind pointing out the irony of things like this. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Darnell Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 9:23 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil So then the question is...is it your place to fix the world? And if so, why are you sitting where you are and not out changing things? Why weren't you in Iraq before we started a 'War on Terror'? (i hope you weren't, or I'll feel like a realyou get the point) I guess what I'm saying is, you're right, there's a lot of things I don't support, but I don't feel a personal responsibility to fix everything in the world. Living my life as my religion dictates is hard enough, without trying to correct everyone else. J On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't support abortions either, nor did I support Saddam slaughtering millions. I wouldn't have supported Hitler or Stalin in their purges either. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Darnell Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 8:55 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Almost five million aborted fetuses? Do you want your taxes raised to take care of them in foster homes? Oh the hard decisions a Compassionate Conservative must make. I honestly don't support abortions, but do you BELIEVE that you will be held responsible in your version of heaven or hell for the mistakes others have made? Why push your personal life and beliefs on others? Everyone answers for themselves in the end... Justin On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh they aren't THAT bad! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 2:32 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil That is true. Do Democrats even have a soul? --- john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The good thing about these abortions is that most of them are democrats!G John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:51 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Helio, ... It is estimated that up to 50% of all fertilized eggs die and are lost (aborted) spontaneously, usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Perhaps Madigan and Pete should go dumpster diving for freshly discarded feminine products to see if there are any fertilized eggs they can rescue. I hear womb transplants are in test, and artificial wombs are being researched. Once we are good to go we can outfit these guys with their own wombs so they can rescue at least one unwanted embryo each year. Kristyne McDaniel [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
Madigan, this is why people can't have meaningful conversations with you. You believe in moral absolutes. You believe you can't be wrong and there are no gray areas. Sounds like any other brand of religious extremism to me. In order to have a reasonable debate you need to have some amount of humility. J On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. It's murder 2. Why don't we allow parents to kill their 1yo kids? 3. Most abortions are by women who don't want to be inconvenienced, not those who can't have the child. 4. There are plenty of adoption options 5. There are plenty of public assistance options for first time offenders. 6. We push our personal beliefs on people all the time, why not to save the life of a child? 7. God will not only punish the aborting parents, but will also punish the legislatures that allow it, the people who vote for pro-abortion candidates, and those who stand idly by and say and do nothing. --- Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Almost five million aborted fetuses? Do you want your taxes raised to take care of them in foster homes? Oh the hard decisions a Compassionate Conservative must make. I honestly don't support abortions, but do you BELIEVE that you will be held responsible in your version of heaven or hell for the mistakes others have made? Why push your personal life and beliefs on others? Everyone answers for themselves in the end... Justin On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh they aren't THAT bad! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 2:32 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil That is true. Do Democrats even have a soul? --- john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The good thing about these abortions is that most of them are democrats!G John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:51 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Helio, ... It is estimated that up to 50% of all fertilized eggs die and are lost (aborted) spontaneously, usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Perhaps Madigan and Pete should go dumpster diving for freshly discarded feminine products to see if there are any fertilized eggs they can rescue. I hear womb transplants are in test, and artificial wombs are being researched. Once we are good to go we can outfit these guys with their own wombs so they can rescue at least one unwanted embryo each year. Kristyne McDaniel [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
I take issue most with your number 7. I guess you've talked to God and he's told you the names of all those people that will be punished for their complacency. Besides, who are you to determine what complacent is. The whole idea is a slippery slope. If you need to defend the children, and you're charged by God, are you the type of person who would kill a doctor performing abortions, or blow up a clinic? I mean, your God did tell you to protect the childrenright? You're NOT out everyday trying to stop abortions? Complacent complacent. And let's look at number 1. You support murdering Saddam, but not fetuses? If killing fetuses is murder we need to recognize that murdering a conscious larger clump of cells is murder too. J On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Darnell, which one of my truths don't you agree with? --- Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Madigan, this is why people can't have meaningful conversations with you. You believe in moral absolutes. You believe you can't be wrong and there are no gray areas. Sounds like any other brand of religious extremism to me. In order to have a reasonable debate you need to have some amount of humility. J On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. It's murder 2. Why don't we allow parents to kill their 1yo kids? 3. Most abortions are by women who don't want to be inconvenienced, not those who can't have the child. 4. There are plenty of adoption options 5. There are plenty of public assistance options for first time offenders. 6. We push our personal beliefs on people all the time, why not to save the life of a child? 7. God will not only punish the aborting parents, but will also punish the legislatures that allow it, the people who vote for pro-abortion candidates, and those who stand idly by and say and do nothing. --- Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Almost five million aborted fetuses? Do you want your taxes raised to take care of them in foster homes? Oh the hard decisions a Compassionate Conservative must make. I honestly don't support abortions, but do you BELIEVE that you will be held responsible in your version of heaven or hell for the mistakes others have made? Why push your personal life and beliefs on others? Everyone answers for themselves in the end... Justin On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh they aren't THAT bad! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 2:32 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil That is true. Do Democrats even have a soul? --- john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The good thing about these abortions is that most of them are democrats!G John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:51 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil Helio, ... It is estimated that up to 50% of all fertilized eggs die and are lost (aborted) spontaneously, usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Perhaps Madigan and Pete should go dumpster diving for freshly discarded feminine products to see if there are any fertilized eggs they can rescue. I hear womb transplants are in test, and artificial wombs are being researched. Once we are good to go we can outfit these guys with their own wombs so they can rescue at least one unwanted embryo each year. Kristyne McDaniel [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
I'm not defending what Saddam did. I'm not defending abortion. Remember these two points. I agree with you that abortion is wrong. I think its more wrong to push my religion based beliefs on others. Perhaps not, 'more wrong' but wrong in its own way. Saddam was a horrible person, but murder is murder, in my book. Even murdering a murderer is wrong. Love your enemies, love your neighbors, etc I'm not saying you would blow up a building, just asking how far do you have to go before you feel like you're doing your part to stop these atrocities? Do you do more than vote and talk about it on an internet forum? Is that enough to escape your God's judgment. John, to illustrate my point, see this quote from Wikipedia: Murder is both a legal and a moral term, that are not always coincident. It may be legal to kill, but still murder in the moral sense. Opponents of the death penalty argue that it is simply murder by the state. In the moral sense, murder is murder to me, and the state shouldn't be doing it. I think all murder is wrong, but in this crazy mixed up world, I don't feel like its my duty to go around enforcing my religious views on other. Justin On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You compare the execution of Saddam Hussein, a man who has killed over a million Iraqis, some by being gassed with chemical weapons, some by being thrown off buildings, some by being thrown into shredders, to aborting an innocent baby in the womb? Saddam had a long trial, was able to face his accusers, had many lawyers, was found guilty under the laws of Iraq, was given a death sentence, and was executed humanely. A baby, on the other hand, has no trial, isn't given any lawyers, can't face its accusers, and is executed by being sucked out or cut up. Sure, that's a good comparison. I've never supported killing abortion doctors and nearly 99.999 percent of all pro-life people don't support it either. Try again. --- Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I take issue most with your number 7. I guess you've talked to God and he's told you the names of all those people that will be punished for their complacency. Besides, who are you to determine what complacent is. The whole idea is a slippery slope. If you need to defend the children, and you're charged by God, are you the type of person who would kill a doctor performing abortions, or blow up a clinic? I mean, your God did tell you to protect the childrenright? You're NOT out everyday trying to stop abortions? Complacent complacent. And let's look at number 1. You support murdering Saddam, but not fetuses? If killing fetuses is murder we need to recognize that murdering a conscious larger clump of cells is murder too. J On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Darnell, which one of my truths don't you agree with? --- Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Madigan, this is why people can't have meaningful conversations with you. You believe in moral absolutes. You believe you can't be wrong and there are no gray areas. Sounds like any other brand of religious extremism to me. In order to have a reasonable debate you need to have some amount of humility. J On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. It's murder 2. Why don't we allow parents to kill their 1yo kids? 3. Most abortions are by women who don't want to be inconvenienced, not those who can't have the child. 4. There are plenty of adoption options 5. There are plenty of public assistance options for first time offenders. 6. We push our personal beliefs on people all the time, why not to save the life of a child? 7. God will not only punish the aborting parents, but will also punish the legislatures that allow it, the people who vote for pro-abortion candidates, and those who stand idly by and say and do nothing. --- Justin Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Almost five million aborted fetuses? Do you want your taxes raised to take care of them in foster homes? Oh the hard decisions a Compassionate Conservative must make. I honestly don't support abortions, but do you BELIEVE that you will be held responsible in your version of heaven or hell for the mistakes others have made? Why push your personal life and beliefs on others? Everyone answers for themselves in the end... Justin On 1/28/07, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh they aren't THAT bad! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Re: [OT] Deaths since the Iraq war -- on our soil
I made the comparison to say that murder is murder. Oh, I see, your God celebrates when you kill SOME of his children... On 1/28/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now John, there you go with the moral absolutes again. I mean, come on, there's no right and wrong, just gray areas. Killing a baby is murder and so is killing Saddam Hussein. You can't make this stuff up. Liberalism is a mental disorder. --- john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a human life, by another, with malice aforethought. Killing Saddam wasn't murder, it was a lawful execution. John And let's look at number 1. You support murdering Saddam, but not fetuses? If killing fetuses is murder we need to recognize that murdering a conscious larger clump of cells is murder too. J ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Saddam - Hung for the Holidays http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Storing code in a table
I have a table called export_list, and a column called exec_code (type memo). In my program I want to execute the code stored in the 'exec_code' column if the column is not empty. Is this possible? My thought was that I could use macro expansion, but I get various errors when trying to execute multi-line statements. Do you all have any tips? Thanks, Justin Darnell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Storing code in a table
Thanks to both of you for your responses. That does work. Do you have to take it to a file? Not a big deal, just curious. Thanks again, J On 1/18/07, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Various ways - you could dump it to a temporary file with STRTOFILE() and then _VFP.DoCmd(DO tempfile.prg) -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Should be interesting to see how Cingular exclusivity hinders adoption of that nifty looking iPhone. On 1/9/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Long live Apple, Inc.! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Toshi, aka Helio explained
What would you possibly be searching for to find this? Justin On 12/12/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.geocities.co.jp/Berkeley/3508/japanesehistory.html Christmas gifts for Real Americans Free Shipping for orders over $50 http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] What is the cost for MySQL anyway?
Stephen, PostgreSQL is actually very common. I have it on all of my CPanel enabled accounts through various hosts. I'm not sure about people JUST hosting databases, but as a general back end available to run your websites, its almost as pervasive as MySQL in my experience. Justin On 12/12/06, Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eugene Vital wrote: I was not aware of the PostgreSQL situation and would look to that as a starting point. Unfortunately you don't find that listed as a database for Hosted Servers frequently. Actually if you Google it you find quite a few. What? http://tinyurl.com/ynctz5 shows 0 hosts. So what are you goggling with? Found http://www.eapps.com/Docs/VPSAdvancedPrices.jsp for 50 - 90 per month for 2.5 gig to 4 gig. I am not finding many to pick from. I haven't tried the Windows version yet but hey - I have a few spare minutes lets see how hard it can be. You do find MySQL as well as M$ SQL. quantity quality. I wonder how may of those places are subsidized my M$FT Few if any. I know of two people who started their own server farms back in the mid 90's and never got money from M$ in all those years. So your saying that MySQL quality sucks because it's everywhere? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.16/582 - Release Date: 12/11/2006 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: An Alternative to Norton ... Suggestions Please
Another vote for NOD32. Just isn't as resource intensive as everything else out there. We have had issues running Norton with our POS program. Tried this and its great! Justin On 12/4/06, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 04:42:13 -0700, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: There must be something better out there. What are other folks using with satisfaction? http://www.eset.com/ NOD32 conserves resources in memory and on disk, leaving more for your critical applications. The installer is just 11 MB and the application consumes an average 23 MB in memory (this fluctuates with changes to the detection technology). ThreatSense updates, which includes heuristics logic and signatures, are usually between 20 kB and 50 kB. Switch to NOD32 and be more productive. Sophos is good, but this is better. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different… [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Stupid Mac Tricks - why?
Have a local Mac store? Stop by and talk to someone at the Genius Bar. Quite often not geniuses per se, but do know their Mac stuff and this would be a walk in the park for them. Further - if you don't have a local Mac store, call support. It sounds like you need to reset the stored Keychain password and the stored login password. I don't have a Mac anymore, but they should both be easy to find under the System Preferences (I think that's what its called...its equivalent to Control Panel). Justin On 11/30/06, mrgmhale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings Chet! Of all the clever responses, despite their intended humor, I must admit my first thought was to get a new girlfriend. All in good humor, of course. But I resisted responding in that manner as I felt someone's feelings may be hurt. So, I guess Dave did the honors for those of us inclined to hold End Users of machinery responsible for any mishaps with the use of said machinery. One of my favorite acronyms is OFU, Operator Error g... But the more serious answer is, of course, stop trying to use a Mac to show how bad Windows is... Even more seriously, perhaps Ed will weigh in on this one and impart his Mac knowledge for those how are now curiously watching this thread unfold. Good Luck! Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chet Gardiner Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stupid Mac Tricks - why? I had to re-install the password(s) for my girlfriend's iMac. Everything else works except: 1) Now it doesn't automatically log her into her account any more and what's worse: 2) It keeps asking for a keychain password. You enter the keychain password -- then you get your email -- then the next time it tries to download email, it asks for the stupid keychain password again... How can I make it stop??? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Product Keys
Yes. There are even some break downs of the neat algorithms used in Windows XP from a research angle. Google is your friendtoo On 11/13/06, Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hal Kaplan wrote: The mention of product keys in another thread reminded me of something I wanted to ask this venerable group. Has anyone ever cracked the algorithm that is used to create these things? I am just curious about this. I have seen web sites that offer them and I even tried one once. All I got was a ton of spam but no working key. Anyone have any info or opinions or rumors about this? TIA www.astalavista.com is your friend. :) Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.3/531 - Release Date: 11/12/2006 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Programmatically transfer files to/from Apple iPods
You might check the interface API for iTunes. Apple has the documentation on their developer site. You can start with loTunes = createobject(itunes.application) J On 11/7/06, Malcolm Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone come across a way to programmatically transfer files to/from Apple iPods? By files I mean audio, video, and photos. I tried googling this topic and it appears the only way to transfer files is via iTunes? Disclaimer: I'm a total novice when it comes to working with iPod's so I may be over-complicating things. Thanks! Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Virtual Earth Interface/Demo
Dave - Great example code. Can't wait to see the class library you come up with. Thanks, Justin Darnell On 10/23/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = =Come on, give us a break though. I can't be expected to do =ALL the work around here! BG = =Dave Crozier = Well you certainly don't expect ME to help, do you? OED added a new word just for me ... conlific. It is the opposite of prolific. Ever since I ran that space mission to Jupiter back in the 60s I have been kind of burned out, ya know? HALinNY fka HAL9000 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Object behavior in COM dll
I have a class written in FoxPro who's first task upon init is to get some settings out of a table and load them as properties on the object. When I instansiate the object (via com) and call the GetSettings() method there are no errors. However, I don't have any new properties. The code for this is: lo = createobject(Backup.BackupManager) lo.GetSettings() ?lo.FTPhost (Check to see if property exists: ERROR unknown name) If I do the same thing using the actual class definition and not through com: SET PROCEDURE TO class.prg lo = createobject(backupmanager) lo.GetSettings() ?lo.FTPhost (ftp address returns properly.) I get what I'm looking for. I get all of the settings loaded in properties like FTPhost. The path is set correctly. My thought is that maybe I can't add properties on the fly to COM objects? Thanks, Justin Darnell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Resetting Debugger windows?
I've inherited a computer from another FoxPro developer at my new job, and somehow the debugger windows have gotten completely messed up. When I call debug I get a watch window and a seperate trace window. Neither are contained inside the normal FoxPro Debugger window that normal comes up. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious. Any tips? I've tried CLEAR DEBUG which is supposed to clears all breakpoints and restores the Debugger windows to their default positions. No luck there either. Thanks! Justin --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] What a fine resume!
I can get to it fine, but have mirrored it here for anyone having trouble: http://wootwoot.org/JohnKarr.html Justin On 8/17/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: looks like they've taken johnkarr's resume down. --- Bob Calco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fired right up for me but here it is: http://www.job4teacher.com/Candidates/JohnKarr.html - Bob ! -Original Message- ! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan ! Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:53 PM ! To: ProFox Email List ! Subject: Re: [OT] What a fine resume! ! ! It's not working ! ! --- Bob Calco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ! ! http://tinyurl.com/nytfv ! ! - - - ! ! - Bob ! ! ! --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- ! multipart/alternative !text/plain (text body -- kept) !text/html ! --- ! ! ! ___ ! Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com ! Subscription Maintenance: ! http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox ! OT-free version of this list: ! http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ! ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, ! are the opinions of the author, and do not ! constitute legal or medical advice. This statement ! is added to the messages for those lawyers who are ! too stupid to see the obvious. ! ! ! ! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Democrat claims right to have sex with little boys
I would bet he doesn't vote. On 8/3/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He's a Pagan Minister. Know any Republican Pagan ministers? --- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Democrat ? Not mentioned in article Man you do have a one track mind... A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Hezbollah Human Shields http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/1688255 Right Wing Stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill of Rights, RIP
That point could be debated, I'm sure, but does it even matter if its man made? Many things that are 'natural' are harmful to humans. The sun is natural, but causes cancer. Bears - natural, but can eat your face. Lightning, asteroids, sharks, etc. It certainly FEELS like its getting hotter, and according to the news outlets over 100 people have died in CA alone due to the recent heat. Whatever the cause of our new found 'warmth', if it continues to get worse in the future more people will die, and that's generally a bad thing. Don't you think so? Compassionate Conservative? Oh and 12 in the NE from FoxNews... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,206819,00.html Here's an interesting (government) site with views of current temperatures vs. past temperatures so you can do some research. http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html On 8/3/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What a stupid remark. There is no man-made global warming. Period. None. --- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Madigan, Yeah, if Al Gore were president there wouldn't be global warming, and if John Kerry were president, there wouldn't be a United States. If Al Gore were president there would still be global warming. We'd just be trying to do something about it instead of arguing about whether it exists or not. We can't ignore the consequences as they are already upon us, and it will take more than a few years to undo the damage -- assuming it is not already too late. - Kris www.shamrocktrails.com, www.mcstyles.com, www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Hezbollah Human Shields http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/1688255 Right Wing Stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill of Rights, RIP
Oh, and Pat Robertson converted too. Isn't he one of 'your people'? http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=domesticNewsstoryid=2006-08-03T182715Z_01_N03438084_RTRUKOC_0_US-ROBERTSON.xmlsrc=rssrpc=22 On 8/3/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What a stupid remark. There is no man-made global warming. Period. None. --- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Madigan, Yeah, if Al Gore were president there wouldn't be global warming, and if John Kerry were president, there wouldn't be a United States. If Al Gore were president there would still be global warming. We'd just be trying to do something about it instead of arguing about whether it exists or not. We can't ignore the consequences as they are already upon us, and it will take more than a few years to undo the damage -- assuming it is not already too late. - Kris www.shamrocktrails.com, www.mcstyles.com, www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Hezbollah Human Shields http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/1688255 Right Wing Stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Web Server Advice
I have not used GoDaddy, but I have used 1 1. I've really enjoyed 1 1 and don't remember having any downtime with them. Bluehost is also pretty good, but I'm not sure if you're looking for a dedicated server or just a hosting plan. Bluehost is my recent hosting plan fixation, and I have to say they are doing a lot of things right (fyi: you get ssh access with Bluehost, and they have Ruby and Rails installed for you to use/play with.) J Hal Kaplan wrote: Does anyone have an opinion to share about hosting by GoDaddy or 1 1? I'd appreciate any salient comments. TIA HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anyone using webservices in real life?
I'm using web services in a few projects for our customers. Mainly involving data retrieval on Symbol handhelds out in the field. We use this for inventory counting, and retrieval. It was surprisingly simple to implement this in VB.NET and has a real big magic factor to it. Oh look, no wires, the live data just appeared! I'm even using it with our live FP data via OLEDB without any issues so far. Best, Justin Darnell Malcolm Greene wrote: Curious: 1. Anyone using 3rd party webservices? 2. Anyone providing webservice interfaces to their customers? 3. Anyone using their own webservices internally? Thanks, Malcolm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Mail addresses on web pages
We use a service called Postini. It has been an incredible filtering tool. It filters about 70 % of our e-mail out, quarantines some ~ 9%, and the rest is legitimate. We've been using it for about a year and I've had two spams get through and one e-mail get quarantined that was legitimate. This is a pretty amazing success rate, and is much better than what I had gotten with Spam assassin and other free tools. I know this doesn't answer your question about mail addresses on webpages, but this was our general solution to spam. I can post my e-mail address anyhwhere (not this one, my work e-mail), and even though I may get spam, the impact is off our servers and we never actually receive it. Plus, as long as you stick with their services, MX record changes are nonexistant, so servers can change without a hiccup in services. Justin Profox wrote: I would use an email obfuscator. Hey, Jim - - - I have had the feeling (but without any way to confirm it) that the spammers are catching up with the obfuscation trick. I also think they are getting the DOT and AT technique. (Lately, a small amount of spam has been coming to this address, which I use only for ProFox -- I don't know where they would get it if not for Ed's archive pages). Anybody else seeing this? There are several ways to obfuscate. The DOT and AT probably being too simple. Some obfuscators use ISO, others HEX, others a combination or custom javascript. You can also create your own obfuscator. We change our static ones out every month or so, but in some cases we use an email form. Jim Eddins [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bad News for the Bad Guys, Bush's Approval rating up 4 points in a week
If a 44 % approval rating is success, then I'm a superstar. Michael Madigan wrote: http://rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm New Lower Prices * Horse Racing Photos at http://michaelmadigan.exposuremanager.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
