Re: Qmail & Web
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Tim Hunter wrote: > Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net. > > sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think. I like TWIG very much. See http://www.screwdriver.net/twig Regards, Siaco. -- Ryszard Łach, Internet Designers s.c., Przedmiejska 6-10, 54-201 Wrocław 'echo "" |mail -s "send key pub" [EMAIL PROTECTED]' for my public GPG key
Merry Christmas everyone.... and have a Great New Year too!
I hope this is not considered as spamming... Luke
user with no Maildir
Hi... How to configure mailder-daemon to reply back to the sender (with error message "No such user" or anything...) if the user don't have Maildir in their home directory? (Some of the users does not allowed to have email). TQ in advance.
Re: a little more insight!
> Is this a cut-n-paste or did you type it into your mail message by hand? > If this is really what the script looks like, try adding a "!" after the > "#", as indicated. > > > usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper > > #/bin/bash >^- add ! here, so it looks like this: > #!/bin/bash Dang, that was a good pick up! ;-) Maybe it will work for him now...
can't remove relay-ctrl
rpm -e ucspi-unix-0.34-1 error: removing these packages would break dependencies: ucspi-unix is needed by qmail-1.03+patches-16 [root@test bruceg]# rpm -e qmail-1.03+patches-16 error: removing these packages would break dependencies: qmail >= 1.03+patches is needed by relay-ctrl-2.5-1 [root@test bruceg]# rpm -e relay-ctrl-2.5-1 execution of script failed what can I do?
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:45:41AM +0800, Paul Tan wrote: > Hi guys and gals, > > I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8. > uudecode fails with an option error > broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component > > Error msg: test-uudecode.tst: No such file or directory Please join the Qmail-Scanner mailing-list. The Qmail list is busy enough without everyone having to worry about all sundrey related packages... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general BTW: The compile didn't fail: "cannot use uudecode component" is what happened. You have ended up with a Qmail-Scanner that just doesn't internally support uuencoded files. If the commercial scanner you are using in conjunction with Qmail-Scanner supports uuencode, then you have no problem anyway. -- Cheers Jason Haar Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
Re: Source RPM
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:03:33PM -0200, Davi wrote: >As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it. >The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed. >Does someone can tell me if is it ok? It seems to be. I mean, there's a link for SRPMs for QMail off the main qmail.org page, so he can't be TOO broken up about it... Sean -- Windows NT: From the people who brought you 640K and EDLIN Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
Re: relaying?
It should be an IP address. On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Kurth Bemis wrote: > ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way > > i am confused about relaying rules > > this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file > > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > however this does not work...when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get > this message > Can't send to ". The server gives this reason: '553 sorry, that domain > isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts(#5.7.1)'. > > as i understand it rcpthosts is the file that holds all the domains that > you have on your machine. > > can somebody point me in the right direction? > > ~kurth > Kurth Bemis - Network/Systems Administrator, USAExpress.net/Ozone Computer > > People disagree with me. I just ignore them. > -- Linus Torvalds, regarding the use of C++ for the Linux kernel > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth > PGP key available - http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth/pgp > > Fight Weak Encryption! Donate your wasted CPU cycles to Distributed.net > (http://www.distributed.net) > >
relaying?
ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way i am confused about relaying rules this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" however this does not work...when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get this message Can't send to ". The server gives this reason: '553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts(#5.7.1)'. as i understand it rcpthosts is the file that holds all the domains that you have on your machine. can somebody point me in the right direction? ~kurth Kurth Bemis - Network/Systems Administrator, USAExpress.net/Ozone Computer People disagree with me. I just ignore them. -- Linus Torvalds, regarding the use of C++ for the Linux kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth PGP key available - http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth/pgp Fight Weak Encryption! Donate your wasted CPU cycles to Distributed.net (http://www.distributed.net)
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
Hi guys and gals, I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8. uudecode fails with an option error __ bash-2.03# CC=gcc ./configure --admin postmaster --domain trevda.com --archive /var/spool/qmailscan --install This script will search your system for the virus scanners it knows about, and will ensure that all external programs qmail-scanner-queue.pl uses are explicitly pathed for performance reasons. It will then generate qmail-scanner-queue.pl - it is up to you to install it correctly. Continue? ([Y]/N) y Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . . broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component Error msg: test-uudecode.tst: No such file or directory Found tnef on your system! That means we'll be able to decode stupid M$ attachments :-) The following binaries and scanners were found on your system: reformime=/usr/local/bin/reformime unzip=/usr/bin/unzip tnef=/usr/local/bin/tnef If that looks correct, I will now generate qmail-scanner-queue.pl for your system... Continue? ([Y]/N) Is there a patch for it to work on solaris or do i have to edit the "configure" file myself? Thks Paul - Original Message - From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:46 AM Subject: Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner? > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Ruprecht Helms wrote: > > Am Die, 19 Dez 2000 schrieb Eric Wang: > > > Hi, guys > > > > > > I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus attachement, > > > > better you try Amavis Scanner. The qmail-scanner is buggy and there isn't > > a fix for the wanted patch qmailscanner is asking for. > > Please don't report FUD about my work! :-) > > Qmail-Scanner is NOT buggy. The patch referred to on the homepage DOES work > and works for (almost) everyone who tries it. I'd guess your system has a > broken patch program or you are just calling it incorrectly. > > Is there anyone out there with an altered distribution of qmail-1.03 that > contains the QMAILQUEUE patch? Pointing people to such a beast would > certainly allow some less experienced people to get going... > > http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/ > > > -- > Cheers > > Jason Haar > > Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ > Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
So, do u use the external viru scan software? or only the qmail-scan defaut? Which external viru scanner r u using? how big is the difference both on speed and secutiy? On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:34:35 +0100 "Einar Bordewich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers > with 512MB each. > Also running the QMAILQUEUE patch with no problems. > > Here are the viruses trapped since 23/08/2000 15:30:48, and I must say that > this solution is doing it's job. > > 230virus TROJ_NAVIDAD.A > 202virus VBS_LOVELETTR.AS > 58virus TROJ_MTX.A > 53virus VBS_KAKWORM.A > 33virus TROJ_HYBRIS.B > 23virus VBS_LOVELETTER-O > 22virus VBS_COLOMBIA > 21virus TROJ_PRETTY_PARK > 19virus PE_CIH > 18virus TROJ_SKA > 15virus PE_MTX.A > 13virus W97M_ETHAN.A > 13Possibly a misdisinfected virus > 12 Love Letter Virus/Trojan > 12virus VBS_STAGES.A > 10Joke program > 7virus W97M_THUS > 6virus JOKE_WOW > 6virus JOKE_FLIPPED > 5virus JOKE_RABBIT > 5virus JOKE_CURSOR.A > 5the W97M/Thus.gen virus !!! > 4virus JOKE_GESCHENK > 4virus JOKE_BUTTONS > 4the WScript/Kak.worm virus !!! > 3virus WM_CAP > 3virus W97M_MARKER > 3virus TROJ_HYBRIS.D > 3the JS/Kak@M virus !!! > 2 Joke/Win-Wobble > 2 Joke/Cokegift > 2virus W97M_WRENCH.E > 2virus W97M_OCARD.A > 2virus W97M_CLASS.Q > 2virus TROJ_SHOCKWAVE.A > 2virus O97M_TRISTATE > 2virus JOKE_SMALLPEN > 2virus JOKE_POINTER.A > 2virus JOKE_KNIJPME > 2virus JOKE_32 > 2the JS/Kak.worm virus !!! > 1 Happy99 Trojan > 1virus X97M_LAROUX.JH > 1virus X97M_LAROUX.BU > 1virus WM_MENTAL.A > 1virus W97M_TITCH.A > 1virus W97M_THUS.I > 1virus W97M_SELIUQ.B > 1virus W97M_SATELLITE > 1virus W97M_PRI.B > 1virus W97M_Generic > 1virus W97M_CLASS.QA > 1virus W97M_CHACK > 1virus W97M_BDOC2X > 1virus W97M_A_OPEY_03 > 1virus TROJ_COCED.240 > 1virus JOKE_FREIBIER.B > 1virus JOKE_DEL_WINDOWS > 1the W97M/Nalp.gen virus !!! > 1the W95/MTX@M virus !!! > 1the W32/Pretty.worm.gen virus !!! > 1the W32/MTX@M virus !!! > 1the BackDoor-HO.cli trojan !!! > > > > -- > > IDG New MediaEinar Bordewich > Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420 > E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no > >
Problem when starting qmail.
[root@sphinx qmail]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail start Starting qmail: svscan. [root@sphinx qmail]# multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied I've followed Dave Sill's qmail installation manual.
Source RPM
Hi guys, As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it. The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed. Does someone can tell me if is it ok? []s Davi
Re: a little more insight!
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
> 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
> zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
> 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format error
> 977352942.018301 tcpserver: end 4501 status 28416
> 977352942.018400 tcpserver: status: 23/40
>
> the contents of qmail-smtpd-wrapper is as follows.
Is this a cut-n-paste or did you type it into your mail message by hand?
If this is really what the script looks like, try adding a "!" after the
"#", as indicated.
> usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
> #/bin/bash
^- add ! here, so it looks like this:
#!/bin/bash
> ulimit -d 1024
> exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
> usa:/var/qmail/bin#
>
> i have a feeling that it may be caused by this line in my
> /etc/init.d/qmail file
>
> supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
> -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID
> 0 smtp /var/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 2>&1
> | setuser qmaill accustamp | setuser qmaill cyclog /var/log/qmail/smtpd &
>
> the above is all on one line.
>
> i'm at wits end with this..can anyone help me out?
>
> ~kurth
>
-thl
Arg! relay problems
I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to send mail. my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such. 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow then after saving that i run tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp < tcp.smtp and that goes through ok when i run tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb i get this. rule : allow connection what givesthen i connect to usaexpress.net:25 i get dropped . any ideas? ~kurth
a little more insight!
diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format error
977352942.018301 tcpserver: end 4501 status 28416
977352942.018400 tcpserver: status: 23/40
the contents of qmail-smtpd-wrapper is as follows.
usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
#/bin/bash
ulimit -d 1024
exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
usa:/var/qmail/bin#
i have a feeling that it may be caused by this line in my
/etc/init.d/qmail file
supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
-x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID
0 smtp /var/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 2>&1
| setuser qmaill accustamp | setuser qmaill cyclog /var/log/qmail/smtpd &
the above is all on one line.
i'm at wits end with this..can anyone help me out?
~kurth
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
Yes they do. But they can also be misused, by for instance the zip file you provided the link for. My servers did'nt take harm of this file, but I'm sure that if I did'nt have the free disk space I have on my servers, they would. I'm not sure what qmail-scanner does if the process running out of disk space. If it removes the uncompressed files, or if it leaves it there. I'll better test that ;-) Of course the server would have problems when several instances would connect sending this file, and this will happen with qmail-scanner since qmail-scanner-queue.pl don't terminate the smtp session until the mail is finnished scanned. This would make the other server timeout, resending the mail. Then again, qmail-scanner/perlscan_scanner provides the ability to deny the mail based on the attachement being of type .zip and of size 42374 bytes solving that problem. I guess both of us can agree on the fact that there is a lot of different ways to make malicious damage to mailservers. -- IDG New MediaEinar Bordewich Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420 E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no - Original Message - From: "Felix von Leitner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 7:54 PM Subject: Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner? > Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend > > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers > > with 512MB each. > > Virus scanners don't solve the problem. > > http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip > > Felix >
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 December 2000 at 19:54:33 +0100 > Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend > > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers > > with 512MB each. > > Virus scanners don't solve the problem. And police don't solve the problem of crime, and schools don't solve the problem of ignorance, and locks don't solve the problem of burglars. I still think it's stupid not to have locks on the doors to your house, even though they (and the police) don't completely solve the problem. Possibly virus scanners don't solve the problem, and are still useful? -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED] SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
Re: Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?
Thanks Jon. Jerry R. Keene Senior Systems Analyst SCS ENGINEERS---1970-2000! Thirty Year Anniversary Partners With EPA Through The Landfill Methane Outreach Program Phone: 703.471.6150 Fax: 703.471.6676 http://www.scsengineers.com
Re: a little more insight!
Hmm... check user and exec permissions on the file 'qmail-smtpd-wrapper'?
That's all I can think of. Then maybe try another script that doesn't do
much -- etc...
Later,
Ben.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
> 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
> zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
> 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format error
> 977352942.018301 tcpserver: end 4501 status 28416
> 977352942.018400 tcpserver: status: 23/40
>
> the contents of qmail-smtpd-wrapper is as follows.
>
> usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
> #/bin/bash
> ulimit -d 1024
> exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
> usa:/var/qmail/bin#
>
> i have a feeling that it may be caused by this line in my
> /etc/init.d/qmail file
>
> supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
> -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID
> 0 smtp /var/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 2>&1
> | setuser qmaill accustamp | setuser qmaill cyclog /var/log/qmail/smtpd &
>
> the above is all on one line.
>
> i'm at wits end with this..can anyone help me out?
>
> ~kurth
>
--
B. http://makelinux.org/"Always real."http://realthought.net/
__
It's hard to get ivory in Africa, but in Alabama the Tuscaloosa.
-- Groucho Marx
Re: Arg! relay problems
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:28:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to > send mail. > > my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such. > > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > 216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > :allow > > then after saving that i run > > tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp < tcp.smtp > > and that goes through ok > > when i run > > tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb > > i get this. > > rule : > allow connection Try tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb 216.177.2.1 <-- 1 can be any valid IP address on your site. man tcprulescheck for more information. > what givesthen i connect to usaexpress.net:25 i get dropped . > > any ideas? > > ~kurth > -thl
Re: svscan
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: > > Thanks again: > > > > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin > > > svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console > > > > All on one line? > no, makes up two lines Right. It needs to be one line. > > Are there any messages on /dev/console? > no, there is nothing in /dev/console/ Once you make it one line you'll get them. You need to signal init every time you change this file. Read the man pages on init and initab to get an understanding of this mechanism. > > What happens if you start up svscan manually? > > > > # cd / > > # /usr/local/bin/svscan /service > > > > Show us the output. > many messages: > supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied > supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist > supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied You have a serious number of install errors. You should re-check every step you made to ensure you followed the instructions exactly. The errors you are getting occur when people don't follow instructions to the letter. And I do mean EXACTLY TO THE LETTER. I suggest that for each step you do in the install, you then check that what you've done is correct. If the instruct says to create a file, do a cat to check it. If the instruction says to set a mode, use an ls -l to check it. If you make a synmlink, make sure that it links with ls -lL. Better yet, get a friend or peer to check each step with you. If the instructions aren't absolutely clear to you or your peer, ask what they mean, don't guess. This list knows only too well that guessers get it wrong - invariably. Here's a simple example. What made you split the inittab entry into two lines? Did you guess that it was ok? Regards.
Re: svscan
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: > many messages: > supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied > supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist > supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied Are these log entries not explicit enough for you? Generally scripts need to be executable and exist if you expect them to be run. --Adam
Re: svscan
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:32:46PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote: > Thomas, > > I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from > 2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that > I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way. I don't know what this 2.x and 3.x refers to - certainly not svscan from cr.yp.to, but in any event, svscan does not deal with the supervise scripts, supervise does. > > still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again. I guess that's one way to get a clue as to what's going on. Not my first choice though. Regards.
Re: svscan
Thanks again: > > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin > > svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console > > All on one line? no, makes up two lines > Are there any messages on /dev/console? no, there is nothing in /dev/console/ > > What happens if you start up svscan manually? > > # cd / > # /usr/local/bin/svscan /service > > Show us the output. many messages: supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied and actually these messages are many times each. The permissions for /var/qmail/ are me with grp qmail. For whom should they be permissioned? thanks!
Help! not working after upgrade from sendmail to qmail!
I don't have problem with sendmail. i've just upgrade to qmail few days ago and got this strange problem. some of the remote side randomly gives error 500! especially to aol and psi.net. any ideas? (my system is running bruceg's qmail 1.03+patch rpm on RH6.2) > Dec 18 17:45:23 localhost qmail: 977190323.707203 starting delivery 147: msg > 18384 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 18 17:45:23 ms qmail: 977190323.708073 starting delivery 148: msg 18384 > to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 18 17:48:56 ms qmail: 977190536.030830 delivery 147: success: > 38.8.139.2_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK_id=147wqV-0002PD-00/ > Dec 18 17:49:25 ms qmail: 977190565.930745 delivery 148: failure: > Connected_to_38.8.139.2_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_500_Comma > nd_unrecognized > thanks in advance, rgds, Vincent
Re: svscan
Thomas, I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from 2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way. martin Thomas Holton wrote: > still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again. > -tom
Re: ?
richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4 > local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i > have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for > [newborn to linux / unix / qmail world]. there is an entry about spawn > dying. Is it qmail-lspawn that's dying? After mail starts to queue up, do a `ps auxwww | grep qmail`. Post the results here. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: svscan
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:50:05PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: > > Thanks for your prompt reply. > The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the > documentation: > > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin > svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console All on one line? SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console Are there any messages on /dev/console? What happens if you start up svscan manually? # cd / # /usr/local/bin/svscan /service Show us the output. Regards. > > since svscan is located /usr/local/bin, it is clearly in the path. > Besides, the message is talking about respawning too fast... it is still > doing it at this time as well. Any other information you can give is > greatly appreciated! > > > > On 20 Dec 2000, Mark Delany wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail, > > > > > > Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the > > > manageability and reliability of starting qmail. > > > > > > > and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in > > > > enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file: > > > > > > > > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes > > > > > > > > dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45 > > > > minutes... any ideas? > > > > > > This is actually a general Unix admin question, but be that as it > > > may... > > > > > > You could have made make life a lot easier by showing us the inittab > > > entry. Did you double-check that your inittab entry is correct? Did > > > you read the inittab man page to understand what it's trying to do? > > > How does that gel with the inittab entry you created? > > > > > > My guess is that you've got the path wrong to svscan or that the path > > > points to something that isn't executable or that you've asked svscan > > > to scan a directory that doesn't exist. > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > >
Re: Qmail & Web
Jean Caron wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before. > > Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes, > which works well with Qmail ? > > Any pointers will be appreciated. > Jean We use Squirrel Mail (http://www.squirrelmail.org/). Very nice. -- Brendon Colby System Administrator Midcontinent Internet
?
hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4 local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for [newborn to linux / unix / qmail world]. there is an entry about spawn dying. sorry to be so brief but have not had time focus on it. any ideas? richard morris.
Re: Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I >have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for. > >I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how >the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog >program. I see that they are both started independently and that >multilog accepts input in STDIN, but I don't see how qmail-* knows >about multilog and knows to send to its STDIN. svscan is the missing link, as dd-b pointed out. >Further adding to my confusion is the line in section 2.9 "Note that >using these instructions, logging will be accomplished by multilog, >not splogger". My /var/qmail/rc file (from LWQ)states 'qmail-start >./Maildir splogger qmail'. That tells me that splogger is being >used. The LWQ /var/qmail/rc file does *not* specify splogger. Check again. -Dave
Re: svscan
Actually mine is an install from the source which i have done. so i bet our problem is not the same then huh? unfortunately i downloaded the most recent version, so i wonder how i should go about this now? still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again. -tom On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote: > Thomas, > > I'm finding theexact same problem here. I guess you are installing from > Bruce's RPM packages ... well it seems that there is some kind of > version mismatch between the packages. > > I couldn't solve it yet. I'd say you should check which are the > recommended verisons of the daemontools package and the > supervise-scripts package... that's the path I'm following. > > > martin > > Thomas Holton wrote: > > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes >
Re: svscan
Thanks for your prompt reply. The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the documentation: SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console since svscan is located /usr/local/bin, it is clearly in the path. Besides, the message is talking about respawning too fast... it is still doing it at this time as well. Any other information you can give is greatly appreciated! > On 20 Dec 2000, Mark Delany wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: > > > > > > Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail, > > > > Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the > > manageability and reliability of starting qmail. > > > > > and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in > > > enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file: > > > > > > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes > > > > > > dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45 > > > minutes... any ideas? > > > > This is actually a general Unix admin question, but be that as it > > may... > > > > You could have made make life a lot easier by showing us the inittab > > entry. Did you double-check that your inittab entry is correct? Did > > you read the inittab man page to understand what it's trying to do? > > How does that gel with the inittab entry you created? > > > > My guess is that you've got the path wrong to svscan or that the path > > points to something that isn't executable or that you've asked svscan > > to scan a directory that doesn't exist. > > > > > > Regards. > > >
Re: svscan
Thomas, I'm finding theexact same problem here. I guess you are installing from Bruce's RPM packages ... well it seems that there is some kind of version mismatch between the packages. I couldn't solve it yet. I'd say you should check which are the recommended verisons of the daemontools package and the supervise-scripts package... that's the path I'm following. martin Thomas Holton wrote: > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
Re: svscan
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: > > Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail, Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the manageability and reliability of starting qmail. > and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in > enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file: > > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes > > dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45 > minutes... any ideas? This is actually a general Unix admin question, but be that as it may... You could have made make life a lot easier by showing us the inittab entry. Did you double-check that your inittab entry is correct? Did you read the inittab man page to understand what it's trying to do? How does that gel with the inittab entry you created? My guess is that you've got the path wrong to svscan or that the path points to something that isn't executable or that you've asked svscan to scan a directory that doesn't exist. Regards.
svscan
Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail, and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file: Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45 minutes... any ideas? thanks,
RE: Qmail & Web
Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net. sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think. -Original Message- From: Jean Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Qmail & Web Hi folks, This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before. Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes, which works well with Qmail ? Any pointers will be appreciated. Jean
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers > with 512MB each. Virus scanners don't solve the problem. http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip Felix
Qmail & Web
Hi folks, This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before. Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes, which works well with Qmail ? Any pointers will be appreciated. Jean
Re: Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:36:05PM -0500, Jerry Keene wrote: > Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in > place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility. > > Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by > the system. > > Very definitely the "filtered outs" ought to take steps to get off the > RBL lists for their own good. > > With that said, however, is it possible to readily build exception- > lists that allow e-mail correspondence with contacts on the RBL > database? In your tcp.smtp file used by tcpserver: # allow this IP through 10.10.10.10:allow,RBLSMTPD="" Conversely, to block someone not in the list: # hostgo.com are spamming bastards 9/24/00 209.217.19.180:allow,RBLSMTPD="-Hostgo spam is not wanted here" jon
Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?
Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility. Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by the system. Very definitely the "filtered outs" ought to take steps to get off the RBL lists for their own good. With that said, however, is it possible to readily build exception- lists that allow e-mail correspondence with contacts on the RBL database? Jerry R. Keene Senior Systems Analyst SCS ENGINEERS---1970-2000! Thirty Year Anniversary Partners With EPA Through The Landfill Methane Outreach Program Phone: 703.471.6150 Fax: 703.471.6676 http://www.scsengineers.com
Re: ETRN
richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone tried to use the ETRN command from behind a router using NAT. Our > problem is we can send out the ETRN command to port 25 on the ISP's box but > they cannot come in? Does your router know which server to forward the incoming connection to? I've seen that problem several times with our customers. -- "I live in the heart of the machine. We are one."
Re: Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 December 2000 at 16:29:07 GMT > I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand > how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the > multilog program. I see that they are both started independently > and that multilog accepts input in STDIN, but I don't see how > qmail-* knows about multilog and knows to send to its STDIN. LWQ is recommending a setup where qmail-send and tcpserver are both run under supervise, which in turn is under control of svscan, am I remembering this right? In that scenario, svscan recognizes the need for a second supervise to do logging by the presence of the 't' bit in the directory permissions on the directory for the service. > Further adding to my confusion is the line in section 2.9 "Note > that using these instructions, logging will be accomplished by > multilog, not splogger". My /var/qmail/rc file (from LWQ)states > 'qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail'. That tells me that > splogger is being used. > Can someone please describe the link for me? Why does LWQ say to > put splogger on qmail-start command line if it does not even get > used? I'm not sure; is this perhaps vestigial, or to cover the possibility that something will emit output even though it's not expected? -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED] SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link
Hi, I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for. I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog program. I see that they are both started independently and that multilog accepts input in STDIN, but I don't see how qmail-* knows about multilog and knows to send to its STDIN. Further adding to my confusion is the line in section 2.9 "Note that using these instructions, logging will be accomplished by multilog, not splogger". My /var/qmail/rc file (from LWQ)states 'qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail'. That tells me that splogger is being used. Can someone please describe the link for me? Why does LWQ say to put splogger on qmail-start command line if it does not even get used? much thanks. rich
Re: accustamp....
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Seby wrote:
> From were can i get... accustamp
>
> Thankyou..
Charles has already said you can get it from daemontools-0.53 (or
less). However, I've got one in perl if you'd like. It works under
Solaris and Linux.
You'll need to have run h2ph on the /usr/include/* files for it to
work.
--
Regards
Peter
--
Peter Samuel[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development)http://www.e-smith.com (corporate)
Phone: +1 613 368 4398 Fax: +1 613 564 7739
e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada
"If you kill all your unhappy customers, you'll only have happy ones left"
###
#!/pkgs/bin/perl
#
# Return the time as accurately as possible using the gettimeofday()
# system call.
#
require 'sys/syscall.ph';
while()
{
print &accustamp, " $_";
}
sub accustamp
{
my($tv, $secs, $usecs);
# allocate sufficient space for the tv struct
$tv = pack("LI", 0, 0);
syscall(&SYS_gettimeofday, $tv, 0);
($secs, $usecs) = unpack("LI", $tv);
return $secs + $usecs / 1E6;
}
Re: Collect all mail in one account. (Second try)
Bhavesh Vakil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To all qmail members, Don't post the same message to the mailing list twice, just becuase you haven't received an answer yet. It's rude. Besides, there have been at least two followups on the mailing list which answered your questions. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.
Bhavesh Vakil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that > mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same > way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.) receives any mail then all mail > is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains all > mails received through @myserver.com domain. As noted elsewhere, you could do this with the QUEUE_EXTRA functionality, and a filter to only capture incoming mail. See Dan's qmail FAQ about "How do I keep a copy of all mail?" or similar. You could also have .qmail files for every user in your system (except all_users) which forward a copy to all_users@your_domain. > The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in > my system and if my system receive mail with that address then automatically > it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back > feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept all > messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user, The .qmail file ~alias/.qmail-default will handle all mail which doesn't match another local user or more specific alias. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: accustamp....
Seby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From were can i get... accustamp accustamp is a part of older version of Dan Bernstein's daemontools package. The functionality of accustamp has been put into multilog, which replaces cyclog. If you need accustamp, you'll have to go back to daemontools 0.53 (?), I think. If you just need to timestamp stuff, use multilog from the current daemontools and give it a 't' option. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
RE: tai64nlocal
Here's the command we use: /usr/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | multilog t s2 n50 \ !'tai64nlocal | gzip' /usr/qmail/log/SMTP/ & Unfortunately, multilog doesn't honor "s" parameter arguments that big. Anyway, when rotating the log, multilog pipes it through tai64nlocal to store readable timestamps and also compresses the archive with gzip. The only downside is that the "current" logfile still has tai timestamps. Dave -Original Message-From: Marco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:18 AMTo: qmail-mailing listSubject: tai64nlocal Hi, I'm wondering what is the correct use of this command (TAI64NLOCAL) inside the supervise scripts. I have three run scripts in /var/qmail/supervise... and they look like: exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t s200 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d The other two are similar. I don't want the TAI timestamps @ in the log files anymore (they are frightening!!) Other suggestions about more options in the scripts are also welcome. Thank you in advance. Marco Santini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.
I believe you are seeking the queue_extra settings in extra.h in
the qmail source. You need to download the source package
and read some documentation on what modifications you make
to the source. Good luck!
Nathan Harmon
- Original Message -
From: "Bhavesh Vakil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:49 AM
Subject: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.
> To all qmail members,
>
> I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
> system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
> to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with
Sendmail
> in Linux.
>
> My system configuration is give below.
>
> I user RedHat 6.2 Linux
> Domain name is : myserver.com
> Just for example I have following system account in my system
> 1: user_a(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 2: user_b(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 3: user_c(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 4: user_d(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> .
> .
> .
> n: alluser(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Now, I want to achieve following functionality,
>
> When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
> mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy).
Same
> way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.) receives any mail then all
mail
> is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains
all
> mails received through @myserver.com domain.
>
> The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in
> my system and if my system receive mail with that address then
automatically
> it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back
> feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept
all
> messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user,
>
> I achieve above functionality with sendmail like this way,
>
> I added following two lines in my sendmail.mc file
>
> define('LUSER_REPLY','local:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> feature('virtusertable','hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable')
>
> and I remove allmasquerade feature so system never generate bounce back
> message to sender if user is not exist.
>
> My /etc/mail/virtusertable file contains only one line.
> @myserver.comalluser
>
> So with this line allmessages is available to my alluser account.
>
> I just setup qmail according to installation instruction and I
successfully
> receive and send all messages. But how I setup my above requirements. In
> sendmail we have one main file called sendmail.mc is there any file for
> qmail setting ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bhavesh.
>
>
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
Collect all mail in one account. (Second try)
To all qmail members,
I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail
in Linux.
My system configuration is give below.
I user RedHat 6.2 Linux
Domain name is : myserver.com
Just for example I have following system account in my system
1: user_a(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
2: user_b(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
3: user_c(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
4: user_d(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
.
.
.
n: alluser(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Now, I want to achieve following functionality,
When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same
way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.) receives any mail then all mail
is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains all
mails received through @myserver.com domain.
The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in
my system and if my system receive mail with that address then automatically
it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back
feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept all
messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user,
I achieve above functionality with sendmail like this way,
I added following two lines in my sendmail.mc file
define('LUSER_REPLY','local:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
feature('virtusertable','hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable')
and I remove allmasquerade feature so system never generate bounce back
message to sender if user is not exist.
My /etc/mail/virtusertable file contains only one line.
@myserver.comalluser
So with this line allmessages is available to my alluser account.
I just setup qmail according to installation instruction and I successfully
receive and send all messages. But how I setup my above requirements. In
sendmail we have one main file called sendmail.mc is there any file for
qmail setting ?
Regards,
Bhavesh.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Problem authenticating to POP server
I am running Open BSD 2.8 and Qmail. I am calling SMTP and POP using TCPServer with the ff script: if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then echo -n ' Qmail-SMTP'; /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u 7791 -g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \ 2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 & fi if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then echo -n ' Qmail-POP'; /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popu p geek.infinitymalls.com \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & fi My problem is I cannot authenticate using POP. I get an "authorization failed" error message. When I used Inetd to call POP, I am able to authenticate without any problems. Any ideas?
Returned mail: Service unavailable - ERROR
Hi All ! I have problem with dilivering message from outern mail server to local mail server Outern (Sendmail), Local(QMail). While dilivering i have got hext message The original message was received at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:34:58 +0200 from t-rex.net.consul [192.168.1.204] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) - Transcript of session follows - 552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message is too large; 100 bytes max 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Service unavailable I have tested this situation in case dilevering message directly to local mail server 5MB message and I haven't any errors. Anybody can help me. Thnx. ROMUL
accustamp....
From were can i get... accustamp Thankyou.. Seby...
qmail Digest 20 Dec 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1219
qmail Digest 20 Dec 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1219 Topics (messages 54196 through 54265): Re: More on relay problem, something to do with tcpserver 54196 by: Andrew Richards Re: 501 Badly structured mime attachment 54197 by: Alex Kramarov How can I change return path "Return Path?" 54198 by: joaquim 54207 by: Charles Cazabon Re: smtp-auth problem 54199 by: Clemens Hermann Re: odd problem... 54200 by: Dave Sill 54215 by: defender of the protocol Re: Life With qmail -- INCOMPLETE ??? 54201 by: Dave Sill Re: How Using IMAP4/POP3 54202 by: Dave Sill Re: relay-ctrl problem 54203 by: Charles Cazabon Re: Trailing Spaces? 54204 by: Charles Cazabon 54219 by: Markus Stumpf 54261 by: Adam Fladwood 54262 by: Tim Hunter Creating new aliases 54205 by: Joao Costa 54210 by: Peter Samuel Re: Changing the Received line in header 54206 by: Charles Cazabon 54225 by: Markus Stumpf ? 54208 by: richard morris 54211 by: Peter Samuel 54212 by: Tim Hunter Re: Disable envnoathost? 54209 by: Peter Samuel 54218 by: Kris Kelley Re: Qmail support in Australia ? 54213 by: Russell Nelson 54214 by: Peter Samuel How User can change password 54216 by: Ould 54223 by: Charles Cazabon alias and qmail-users 54217 by: pedro 54220 by: Peter Samuel (no subject) 54221 by: Hugo Escobar Re: Potentially stupid question about bounces... 54222 by: Kris Kelley Re: www.abuse.net test and mail Qmail server - Help 54224 by: Russell Nelson 54226 by: Vince Vielhaber 54227 by: Aaron L. Meehan 54235 by: Roberto Samarone Araujo \(RSA\) qmail install 54228 by: Timothy Falardeau 54230 by: Peter Samuel Aliases 54229 by: Alex Le Fevre 54231 by: Charles Cazabon 54232 by: Peter Samuel accept only mails from or for local domain 54233 by: Clemens Hermann Help to solve DNS 54234 by: Tim Hunter 54236 by: Charles Cazabon 54238 by: Markus Stumpf Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings 54237 by: David L. Nicol Should I try the Qmail-scanner? 54239 by: Eric Wang 54240 by: Markus Stumpf 54241 by: Ruprecht Helms 54242 by: Pat Berry 54243 by: Mike Jackson 54244 by: Jason Haar 54247 by: Charles Cazabon 54248 by: Olivier M. 54249 by: Einar Bordewich Re: how to ignore $HOME/.qmail ? 54245 by: Matt Harrington ETRN 54246 by: richard morris unable to install 54250 by: Thomas Holton 54252 by: Markus Stumpf Redirect addresses 54251 by: Ari Arantes Filho 54253 by: Jamin A. Brown 54254 by: Markus Stumpf rcpt/backup mx based on IP ? 54255 by: Markus Stumpf 54256 by: Jamin A. Brown 54257 by: Mark Delany 54258 by: Markus Stumpf 54259 by: Alex Pennace 54260 by: Louis Theran Re: anybody out there at this time ??? confused about checkpassword and pop3 54263 by: Aijaz A. Ansari URGENT : Forward all mails in one account. 54264 by: Bhavesh Vakil tai64nlocal 54265 by: Marco Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Boz, This is a FAQ - three options: - Inform the sysadmin of the offending remote machine that it's broken - Use fixcrio - Edit qmail-smtpd to return a permanent rather than a temporary error on receiving a bare-LF. Search the archive for more detail on any of the above. cheers, Andrew. -- From: Boz Crowther[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2000 19:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: More on relay problem, something to do with tcpserver Interesting. I couldn't check the return from my mailer, since it didn't provide one (VERY basic utility). Upgrading to a new version of the mailer corrects the problem, however. Now, is there any way to resolve the stray-LF problem, short of upgrading all the workstations on my network? Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 11:31 AM Subject: Re: More on relay problem, something to do with tcpserver > Boz Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, by checking the logs I've determined that from certain clients (namely a > > command-line DOS smtp mailer we use) the smtp connection ends before getting > > any data, with the following message in /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd/current: > > > > tcpserver: end xxx status 256 > [...] > > Sim
tai64nlocal
Hi, I'm wondering what is the correct use of this command (TAI64NLOCAL) inside the supervise scripts. I have three run scripts in /var/qmail/supervise... and they look like: exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t s200 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d The other two are similar. I don't want the TAI timestamps @ in the log files anymore (they are frightening!!) Other suggestions about more options in the scripts are also welcome. Thank you in advance. Marco Santini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.
To all qmail members,
I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail
in Linux.
My system configuration is give below.
I user RedHat 6.2 Linux
Domain name is : myserver.com
Just for example I have following system account in my system
1: user_a(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
2: user_b(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
3: user_c(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
4: user_d(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
.
.
.
n: alluser(email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Now, I want to achieve following functionality,
When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same
way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.) receives any mail then all mail
is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains all
mails received through @myserver.com domain.
The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in
my system and if my system receive mail with that address then automatically
it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back
feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept all
messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user,
I achieve above functionality with sendmail like this way,
I added following two lines in my sendmail.mc file
define('LUSER_REPLY','local:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
feature('virtusertable','hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable')
and I remove allmasquerade feature so system never generate bounce back
message to sender if user is not exist.
My /etc/mail/virtusertable file contains only one line.
@myserver.comalluser
So with this line allmessages is available to my alluser account.
I just setup qmail according to installation instruction and I successfully
receive and send all messages. But how I setup my above requirements. In
sendmail we have one main file called sendmail.mc is there any file for
qmail setting ?
Regards,
Bhavesh.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
