Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Erik A. Espinoza]

It won't be the default, it'll be up to every admin to choose.

Erik

On Dec 6, 2007 8:28 AM, Justice London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The plan sounds, sound... but I would worry about putting a yum update
> for this anywhere near a cronjob.  There have been enough as far as
> issues I've seen when dealing with normal system updating via automated
> yum, let alone mail.  If nothing else, I would think it a good idea not
> to make that default.
>
> Justice
>
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:17 -0800, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> > The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
> > creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.
> >
> > This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
> > require a little special care on the QmailToaster.
> >
> > For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
> > spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
> > needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
> > may crash.
> >
> > Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
> > script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:
> >
> > 1) Shut down qmail
> > 2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
> > always be enabled=0
> > 3) Qmail cdb
> > 4) Start Qmail
> >
> > Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
> > just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
> > updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.
> >
> > Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erik
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Joseph Lundgren
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It's actually much easier than that.  RPMForge is set up to handle "2nd
> > > party" RPMs.  http://rpmforge.net/user/faq/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From the CentOS wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge ):
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > RPMForge is a collaboration of Dag, Dries, and other packagers. They 
> > > provide
> > > over 2600 packages for CentOS, including mplayer, xmms-mp3, and other
> > > popular media tools. It is not part of RedHat or CentOS but is designed to
> > > work with these major distributions.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I haven't personally experienced the process of submitting RPMs for
> > > inclusion to the RPMForge, but I imagine it's quite reasonable.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Joseph Lundgren
> > >
> > > Systems Engineer
> > >
> > > Peak Internet, LLC
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:38 AM
> > >  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > >  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine
> > > with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first 
> > > mean
> > > getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.
> > >
> > >  W
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> > >
> > >  http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! Shouldn't
> > > it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster 
> > > packages!?
> > >
> > >  Johannes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  --
> > >
> > >
> > >  |-
> > >  |  weberhofer GmbH   

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Justice London]

The plan sounds, sound... but I would worry about putting a yum update
for this anywhere near a cronjob.  There have been enough as far as
issues I've seen when dealing with normal system updating via automated
yum, let alone mail.  If nothing else, I would think it a good idea not
to make that default.

Justice

On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:17 -0800, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
> creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.
> 
> This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
> require a little special care on the QmailToaster.
> 
> For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
> spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
> needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
> may crash.
> 
> Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
> script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:
> 
> 1) Shut down qmail
> 2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
> always be enabled=0
> 3) Qmail cdb
> 4) Start Qmail
> 
> Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
> just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
> updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.
> 
> Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
> 
> Thanks,
> Erik
> 
> On Nov 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Joseph Lundgren
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It's actually much easier than that.  RPMForge is set up to handle "2nd
> > party" RPMs.  http://rpmforge.net/user/faq/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From the CentOS wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge ):
> >
> >
> >
> > RPMForge is a collaboration of Dag, Dries, and other packagers. They provide
> > over 2600 packages for CentOS, including mplayer, xmms-mp3, and other
> > popular media tools. It is not part of RedHat or CentOS but is designed to
> > work with these major distributions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I haven't personally experienced the process of submitting RPMs for
> > inclusion to the RPMForge, but I imagine it's quite reasonable.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Joseph Lundgren
> >
> > Systems Engineer
> >
> > Peak Internet, LLC
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:38 AM
> >  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> >  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine
> > with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first mean
> > getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.
> >
> >  W
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> >
> >  http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> >
> >
> >
> >  I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! Shouldn't
> > it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster packages!?
> >
> >  Johannes
> >
> >
> >
> >  --
> >
> >
> >  |-
> >  |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
> >  |  information technologies
> >  |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> >  |--->>
> >
> >  -
> >   QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> >  -
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >  This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have done
> > this a few years ago...
> >  Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince distributors
> > to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be nice... a qmt
> > package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice tr

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[South Computers]

Wow...  Excellent news! 

I agree, qmt is much more than just qmail. The toaster is the toaster, 
qmail is qmail.

Should definitely be kept separate.

DJB, if you read this list, a big thanks!




Erik A. Espinoza wrote:


Glad you approve of the plan.

Erik

On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 


Hi Erik,

This is great. And your plan is solid.

Regards,

Nick

   


The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.

This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
require a little special care on the QmailToaster.

For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
may crash.

Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:

1) Shut down qmail
2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
always be enabled=0
3) Qmail cdb
4) Start Qmail

Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.

Hope this helps clarify things a bit.

Thanks,
Erik

 




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


   



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Glad you approve of the plan.

Erik

On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> This is great. And your plan is solid.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick
>
> > The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
> > creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.
> >
> > This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
> > require a little special care on the QmailToaster.
> >
> > For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
> > spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
> > needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
> > may crash.
> >
> > Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
> > script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:
> >
> > 1) Shut down qmail
> > 2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
> > always be enabled=0
> > 3) Qmail cdb
> > 4) Start Qmail
> >
> > Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
> > just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
> > updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.
> >
> > Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erik
> >
>
>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[nick]

Hi Erik,

This is great. And your plan is solid.

Regards,

Nick

> The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
> creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.
>
> This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
> require a little special care on the QmailToaster.
>
> For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
> spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
> needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
> may crash.
>
> Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
> script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:
>
> 1) Shut down qmail
> 2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
> always be enabled=0
> 3) Qmail cdb
> 4) Start Qmail
>
> Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
> just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
> updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.
>
> Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Erik A. Espinoza]

The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.

This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
require a little special care on the QmailToaster.

For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
may crash.

Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:

1) Shut down qmail
2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
always be enabled=0
3) Qmail cdb
4) Start Qmail

Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.

Hope this helps clarify things a bit.

Thanks,
Erik

On Nov 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Joseph Lundgren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> It's actually much easier than that.  RPMForge is set up to handle "2nd
> party" RPMs.  http://rpmforge.net/user/faq/
>
>
>
>
>
> From the CentOS wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge ):
>
>
>
> RPMForge is a collaboration of Dag, Dries, and other packagers. They provide
> over 2600 packages for CentOS, including mplayer, xmms-mp3, and other
> popular media tools. It is not part of RedHat or CentOS but is designed to
> work with these major distributions.
>
>
>
>
>
> I haven't personally experienced the process of submitting RPMs for
> inclusion to the RPMForge, but I imagine it's quite reasonable.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joseph Lundgren
>
> Systems Engineer
>
> Peak Internet, LLC
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> From: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:38 AM
>  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain
>
>
>
>
>
> Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine
> with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first mean
> getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.
>
>  W
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
>
> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
>
>  http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
>
>
>
>  I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! Shouldn't
> it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster packages!?
>
>  Johannes
>
>
>
>  --
>
>
>  |-
>  |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
>  |  information technologies
>  |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
>  |--->>
>
>  -
>   QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have done
> this a few years ago...
>  Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince distributors
> to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be nice... a qmt
> package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice treat... Am I
> dreaming?
>
>  But first all the patches and necessary changes to it must be stable and
> hussle free...
>
>  I think we'll have to way and see... but anyway,  it's great news... :)
>
>  --
>  AM
>  agmsoft(at)gmail.com
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Joseph Lundgren]

It's actually much easier than that.  RPMForge is set up to handle "2nd
party" RPMs.  http://rpmforge.net/user/faq/ 

 

 

>From the CentOS wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge ):

 

RPMForge is a collaboration of Dag, Dries, and other packagers. They
provide over 2600 packages for CentOS, including mplayer, xmms-mp3, and
other popular media tools. It is not part of RedHat or CentOS but is
designed to work with these major distributions.

 

 

I haven't personally experienced the process of submitting RPMs for
inclusion to the RPMForge, but I imagine it's quite reasonable.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

--

Joseph Lundgren

Systems Engineer

Peak Internet, LLC

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:38 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

 

Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine
with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first
mean getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.

W

On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 

2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html


http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html 



I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail!
Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the
toaster packages!?

Johannes



--


|-
|  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
|  information technologies
|  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
|--->> 


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>

- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have
done this a few years ago... 
Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince
distributors to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be
nice... a qmt package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice
treat... Am I dreaming?

But first all the patches and necessary changes to it must be stable and
hussle free...

I think we'll have to way and see... but anyway,  it's great news... :)

-- 
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com 

 

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Warren Melnick]

Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine
with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first mean
getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.

W

On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> 2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> >
> > http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> >
> >
> >
> > I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail!
> > Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster
> > packages!?
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > |-
> > |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
> > |  information technologies
> > |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> > |--->>
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have
> done this a few years ago...
> Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince distributors
> to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be nice... a qmt
> package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice treat... Am I
> dreaming?
>
> But first all the patches and necessary changes to it must be stable and
> hussle free...
>
> I think we'll have to way and see... but anyway,  it's great news... :)
>
> --
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[A M]

2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
>
>
>
> I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! Shouldn't
> it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster packages!?
>
> Johannes
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> |-
> |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
> |  information technologies
> |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> |--->>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have done
this a few years ago...
Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince distributors
to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be nice... a qmt
package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice treat... Am I
dreaming?

But first all the patches and necessary changes to it must be stable and
hussle free...

I think we'll have to way and see... but anyway,  it's great news... :)

-- 
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Warren Melnick]

I got that part - I meant as far as maintaining the qmail project itself.

In fact, it not only means no building, but it means that the srmps, if you
want them to, can have all of the patches already in place and the binary
RPMS as well.

W

On Nov 30, 2007 11:04 AM, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> this means no more building on your own. you no longer need build
> tools installed on your mail server (those of us with no dev server).
> you only need to yum intall the qmail packages and yum update when new
> packages are in!
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 8:57 AM, Warren Melnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does that mean for this project and similar ones?  Not that all of
> the
> > common patches can be rolled into qmail itself and configured with
> switches
> > (in files, etc).
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > W
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Nov 30, 2007 4:53 AM, Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > FINALLY!
> > >
> > > Great news, indeed. Binary distributions are now finally a reality.
> > >
> > > If anything, this can only breathe renewed life and vigor into qmail.
> > >
> > > Harry
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> > > >
> > > > http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail!
> > > > Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the
> > > > toaster packages!?
> > > >
> > > > Johannes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > |-
> > > > |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
> > > > |  information technologies
> > > > |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> > > > |--->>
> > > >
> > > >
> -
> > > >QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted < http://www.vr.org>
> > > >
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[slamp slamp]

this means no more building on your own. you no longer need build
tools installed on your mail server (those of us with no dev server).
you only need to yum intall the qmail packages and yum update when new
packages are in!

On Nov 30, 2007 8:57 AM, Warren Melnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does that mean for this project and similar ones?  Not that all of the
> common patches can be rolled into qmail itself and configured with switches
> (in files, etc).
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> W
>
>
>
>  On Nov 30, 2007 4:53 AM, Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FINALLY!
> >
> > Great news, indeed. Binary distributions are now finally a reality.
> >
> > If anything, this can only breathe renewed life and vigor into qmail.
> >
> > Harry
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> > >
> > > http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail!
> > > Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the
> > > toaster packages!?
> > >
> > > Johannes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > |-
> > > |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
> > > |  information technologies
> > > |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> > > |--->>
> > >
> > > -
> > >QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted < http://www.vr.org>
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Warren Melnick]

What does that mean for this project and similar ones?  Not that all of the
common patches can be rolled into qmail itself and configured with switches
(in files, etc).

Any thoughts?

W

On Nov 30, 2007 4:53 AM, Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> FINALLY!
>
> Great news, indeed. Binary distributions are now finally a reality.
>
> If anything, this can only breathe renewed life and vigor into qmail.
>
> Harry
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH
> wrote:
>
> > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> >
> > http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> >
> >
> >
> > I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail!
> > Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the
> > toaster packages!?
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > |-
> > |  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
> > |  information technologies
> > |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> > |--->>
> >
> > -
> >QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

[Harry Zink]

FINALLY!

Great news, indeed. Binary distributions are now finally a reality.

If anything, this can only breathe renewed life and vigor into qmail.

Harry


On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH  
wrote:



http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html

http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html



I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail!  
Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the  
toaster packages!?


Johannes



--


|-
|  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
|  information technologies
|  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
|--->>

-
   QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]