Re: How to enable Telnet service???

[EdwardSPL]

huter liu wrote:

> Hi,redhat-list!
>  I just installed enigma,network is Ok,but I can't use telnet from WIN98 client 
>in the same subnet,I don't know what thing disabled it(maybe firewall??),I installed 
>telnet-server,and in ntsysv telnet is enabled,I also read something about tcpd,and I 
>modified /etc/xinetd.d/telnet,a line like disable = yes is modified to disable = 
>no.
> Huter.Liu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,

I guess you didn't run /etc/rc.d/int.d/xinet restart

Edward.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

How to enable Telnet service???

[huter liu]

Hi,redhat-list!
 I just installed enigma,network is Ok,but I can't use telnet from WIN98 client in 
the same subnet,I don't know what thing disabled it(maybe firewall??),I installed 
telnet-server,and in ntsysv telnet is enabled,I also read something about tcpd,and I 
modified /etc/xinetd.d/telnet,a line like disable = yes is modified to disable = 
no.
Huter.Liu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Cert problem popping with 7.2

[Rodolfo J. Paiz]

Friends, countrymen, penguins:

I am *thoroughly* baffled. Have set up a new 7.2 mailserver, using standard 
RedHat packages:

 * sendmail-8.11.6
 * imap-2000c-15

Now, Eudora cannot POP my mail from that box (same config as on 7.0/7.1 
boxen, of course); it complains about a bad cert and suggests that I add 
the cert to my trust chain. Since I'm not trying to encrypt anything but 
just to use normal POP on port 110, this is confusing to say the least. 
Worse yet is that MS LookOut and Express work "properly"; they POP without 
problems.

*No* changes were made to the default config on the server other than SMTP 
AUTH (LOGIN PLAIN) which is working properly and letting sendmail listen to 
the outside network. Can anyone suggest what the hell may have changed? 
I've found two files that interest me:

 * /usr/share/ssl/certs/imapd.pem
 * /usr/share/ssl/certs/ipopd.pem

However, I'm not sure what the heck to do with them. "make usage" in that 
directory gives a list of instructions which I do not understand, and I'm 
not trying to use secure POP (yet); just POP. That is, the pop3s service is 
OFF; only ipop3 is ON.

xinetd has been restarted, the entire box has been restarted, configs have 
been checked... the obvious has been done unless I forgot something.  Is Eudora broken here, or is something else going on?


--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Two ISA NIC can't work???

[huter liu]

Hi,redhat-list!
 I downloaded the RedHat 7.2 and installed it into my computer,I'm a newbie and I 
want to set it as a router(just test,no heavy load),so I pluged two NIC(a ISA ne clone 
eth1 and a ISA eexpress eth0),system see them at boot time,I add two line to the 
/etc/modules.conf,from dmesg I can see them.the ne clone connect to outsied net via a 
HUB,it works,I can ping yahoo,I assigned a IP like X.X.224.43 to ne clone;the eexpress 
connect with a WIN95 client(NIC is eexpress too) via a BNC cable,Then:
 1.I assigned a IP 192.168.1.1 to eexpress,the client 192.168.1.2,the client can't 
ping Linux box!The cable is Ok,I use the softset2 tool from intel site(eexpress is 
Intel Ether Express NIC card,ISA,AUI,BNC,RJ45 interface,autodetect),I run diagnostics 
on board,is Ok;then I set client as diagnostics responder,run diagnostics on network 
on the Linux box,it's Ok.
 2.So I think there is something strange..I use two X.X.255.43 and X.X.255.44 
assign to the eth0 and client,but it don't work too.
 3.Maybe the other case is off topic.I use the Dhcpd to setup IP in subnet 
X.X.224.0 C class subnet,Linux box A(with two NIC just mentioned) run Dhcpd seems 
well(it say  Listening on Socket/eth0/X.X.224.0..),but when I set a client WIN95 
in subnet X.X.224.0(via HUB) "Configure TCP/IP address automatically",client can't 
lease a IP when boot,But the really strange thing is another Linux box B,almost same 
with A,different is B have only one NIC,connect to HUB,subnet X.X.224.0,installed 
RedHat 7.2,it's almost a clone from A,Dhcpd run on B Ok!!!client can lease a IP when 
boot,I turn off the client,then kill -sigterm Dhcpd_   PID,start Dhcpd on A,turn 
on client,so client can't lease a IP..
 4.Is it a problem with Dhcpd or with the two NICI know the Dhcpd ship with 
RedHat is very stable.And I changed several NIC in Linux box A.every NIC is 
good,but none work with the BNC cable,I set the NIC work as BNC mode.
Huter.Liu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: what is what in Linux

[Matthew Melvin]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 at 5:30pm (+0200), Avrahami, David wrote:

> Hi
> In digital unix I use "what" command with this printout:
> trm245 # what /bin/ls
> /bin/ls:
> $RCSfile: crt0.s,v $ $Revision: 1.1.21.11 $ (DEC) $Date: 1995/09/06
> 19:5
> 4:27 $
> $RCSfile: ls.c,v $ $Revision: 4.3.23.6 $ (OSF) $Date: 1995/12/18
> 04:11:0
> 0 $
> 
> Do you know which command replace it in Linux?

I'm not familar with 'what' but it looks like it's just seeking out the RCS
identifiers hidden in the binaries... 'ident' does this on linux..

[matthewm@toadhall (7) matthewm]$ ident /bin/mktemp
/bin/mktemp:
 $OpenBSD: mktemp.c,v 1.4 1997/06/20 04:17:42 millert Exp $
[matthewm@toadhall (7) matthewm]$

... of course there's no garentee a binary will acutally contain any 
identifiers so YMMV.

M.

-- 
WebCentral Pty Ltd   Australia's #1 Internet Web Hosting Company
Level 1, 96 Lytton Road.   Network Operations - Systems Engineer
PO Box 4169, East Brisbane.   phone: +61 7 3249 2500
Queensland, Australia.pgp key id: 0x900E515F




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

what is what in Linux

[Avrahami, David]

Hi
In digital unix I use "what" command with this printout:
trm245 # what /bin/ls
/bin/ls:
$RCSfile: crt0.s,v $ $Revision: 1.1.21.11 $ (DEC) $Date: 1995/09/06
19:5
4:27 $
$RCSfile: ls.c,v $ $Revision: 4.3.23.6 $ (OSF) $Date: 1995/12/18
04:11:0
0 $

Do you know which command replace it in Linux?
David Avrahami
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

About default kernel in RedHat!

[Медер Бакиров]

Hi there!
 
I've got Redhat 7.2 installed on my 
system!
 
I just wanted to ask is the kernel, 
supplied default by Redhat is configured for IP Accounting?
 
Thanks in advance!
 

Re: Copying Filesystems

[Cameron Simpson]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:43:27PM -0600, Mike Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I've just installed a larger disk and want to move my / and /boot filesystems
| from the current (and smaller) disk to the new larger disk.  Is there an easy way
| to do this? would rsync be suitable?  I've never done this with linux/unix.

Rsync should be fine. It would be best to come up single user, mount
originals read only, mount targets read write, rsync (with the -x flag -
very important!).
-- 
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

Kryten: It seems, after all this time, that Mr Lister is a robot.
Rimmer: I'll write you into my will if you let me tell him.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

post question ( testing )

[EdwardSPL]

Hello,

Testing only ( needn't reply ) !
Thank and sorry to you !

Edward.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: help with netfilter solved

[Lewi]

solved, because my network use different network 192(255.255.0.0) and 10(255.0.0.0)
every packets that go to my netmask x.x.x.x(255.255.255.192) handled by PREROUTING in 
nat table
(in the script, that network is DROPPED by default)
i don't know why?


On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:56:36PM -0500, Lewi wrote:
> i got rc.firewall script from BoeingWorld.com
> and with little edit to appropriate with my network, because i just have a 1
> ethernet card to access net and LAN.
> add a tcp and udp port which open in my server(I know it from nmap my server)
> 
> now the problem is my server is real ip with 1.2.3.4
> and my lan is 192.169.x.x 10.x.x.x
> 
> now when i ran this script, 
> my lan can not reach my server at all, but ip with same netmask can reach it and 
>it's right with all port which opened.
> so what's wrong?
> 
> 
> my input just like this
> 
> in the INPUT chain
> IPTABLES -A INPUT -p TCP -i eth0 -j tcp_packets
> 
> in the tcp_packets chain
> IPTABLES -A tcp_packets -p tcp -s0/0 --dport 80 -j allowed
> ..
> ..
> ..
> 
> int the allowed chain is default
> 
> 
> -- 
> ichtus
> --
> Lewi Supranata .K
> ICQ: 50643061



-- 
ichtus
--
Lewi Supranata .K
ICQ: 50643061



msg63885/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[OT] PHP: building shared object extensions

[Chad and Doria Skinner]

Does anyone know where I can find information on how to build a php
extension as a shared object? Or can anyone tell me the steps required to do
it. The redhat SPEC file for php has a function that I believe builds the
.so files for MySQL, IMAP and a few other programs, but I would like to
build a few more and don't know where to begin.

Thanks,
Chad



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Copying Filesystems

[Mike Watson]

I've just installed a larger disk and want to move my / and /boot filesystems
from the current (and smaller) disk to the new larger disk.  Is there an easy way
to do this? would rsync be suitable?  I've never done this with linux/unix.

Mike W



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: ximian install on RH7.2 fails

[Avi Aumick]

I finally was able to re-install Ximian gnome, but only after I removed 
all the previous Ximian packages first. Then when I re-ran the Xiamian 
installer, it worked.

Thanks for you help anyway.

Avram

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Steve Lee wrote:

> it happens to me to on both Redhat 7.1 and 7.2
> however, i keep on doing the install and
> it finally takes it.  switch from
> all, to some etc...
> 
> 
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Avi Aumick wrote:
> 
> >
> > I just upgraded my RH7.1 to RH7.2. Since I had Ximian installed for 7.1 I
> > am trying to re-install Ximian for my 7.2 upgrade as required. The Ximian
> > starts to install ok until it comes to doing the actual install. It fails
> > with the following problem:
> >
> > evolution-0.99.0-ximian.1 requires libgpilotd.so.0
> > evolution-0.99.0-ximian.1 requires libgpilotdcm.so.0
> > evolution-0.99.0-ximian.1 requires libgpilotdconduit.so.0
> >
> > However, I checked to see if these libraries were installed and they were.
> > They were located in /usr/lib
> >
> > Is there some reason why the ximian installer does not see these libs?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-- 
---
You know you're getting old when you talk about what
you've done, rather than what you're going to do.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Quota on RH7.1 fails with "Invalid argument" (HELP!!)

[Peter Kiem]

I've searched the RH list archives but cannot find any resolution to this.

I am trying to set up group quotas on the root filesystem of a RH7.1 install.

I modified /etc/fstab to read:
LABEL=/ / ext2 defaults,grpquota 1 1

I did a:
touch /aquota.group


I then rebooted as the init scripts are supposed to do the rest right?  What 
I get in the logs is:

penguin quotaon: quotaon:
penguin quotaon: using //aquota.group on /dev/hda1: Invalid argument
penguin netfs: Mounting other filesystems: succeeded
penguin rc.sysinit: Enabling local filesystem quotas: failed


Could it be that the init scripts are somehow getting a double / when working 
out the quota failname and this is causing it to fail?

BTW, are we supposed to make sure the quota files are 600 permissions?


-- 
Regards,
+---+-+
| Peter Kiem| E-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| Zordah IT | Mobile: +61 0414 724 766|
|   IT Consultancy &| WWW   : www.zordah.net  |
|   Internet Hosting| ICQ   : "Zordah" 81 |
+---+-+






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

ppp woes solved

[Art Ross]

I posted an email a few weeks ago asking for help on setting up the ppp
interface on RH7.0.  It was at that time someone mentioned there were
problems with ppp in this version of RH7.0.  I'd like to share my
solution even though it isn't a full fix.

What I basically do is setup my ISP connection using the Wvdial utility
in GNOME.  This configures my /etc/wvdial.conf file by giving it a name,
the ioport to use, the ISP phone number, username and password.  One
parameter is set; Stupid Mode=0.  I researched my connection and found
this had to be turned on; Stupid Mode=1.  I wanted my connection to
redial if the connection is lost.  This is accomplised by adding and
additional parameter;  Auto Reconnect=1.
  Now I activate my ISP connection at boot time and the modem will
redial if the connection is lost.
  If anyone is interested in seeing a sample wvdial.conf file for a
clearer idea of what I've done, just let me know.
  Best Regards,
  Art



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: recompile kernel - both ext3 and ext2 support?

[ABrady]

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 10:01 pm, you wrote:
> Hi,
>   I am recompiling 2.4.9-13 for NAT learning and experimentation.  When
> I installed RH 7.2 I chose the ext3 file system.  Now when recompiling
> I have choosen ext3 file support.  Is there any reason to also incluce
> ext2 file support.  I know this seems like a stupid question, but the
> simplest of questions unasked has left me hanging before.
>
>   Complile.help file doesn't help me much.

I'd compile both. In my own case I used ext3 with Roswell and also with 
7.2 and had problems. I kept getting corrupted squid cache. It always 
happened on ext3, and always 2-3 days after setting /var as ext3. I could 
delete it and recreate it, then restart squid, wait 2-3 and get the same 
corruption again. It happened at full install and selecting ext3. It 
happened at upgrade and migrating to ext3. Every time I put /var back to 
ext2, the problem disappeared (after recreating the cache again, that is) 
and didn't come back.

I haven't seen any reports from anybody with this or anything else wrong 
with it. But, I fully expected it to work well precisely because I wasn't 
hearing any bad reports.

As always, YMMV. I'd personally play it safe since it doesn't hurt 
anything to keep it around, and it's a lot easier to undo a problem if 
the kernel supports it already.

-- 
Who messed with my anti-paranoia shot?



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Problem with 7.2 Upgrade: eth0 not recognized

[Devon]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 10:38 pm, Mike Watson wrote:
> And where can I subscribe to the enigma-list?

https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list

- -D

- -- 

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt

- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE78e3DeMAUbzJhSVcRAjqPAKC5m08Mso/rdmia7PCxpQsTuDyD1gCdHWj/
8F4GYL7jdcecVL+3ZrsVm/w=
=oZH8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: ide bus speed not optimal?

[Devon]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 05:14 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> > ide: Assuming 33MHz PCI bus speed for PIO modes; override with
> > idebus=xx hda: 78165360 sectors (40021 MB) w/2048KiB Cache,
> > CHS=4865/255/63, UDMA(33)
> >
> > but my hard drives are UDMA 100, how do i get them to run at optimal
> > speed?
>
> What kernel are you running?  What motherboard?
>
> If the kernel reports the drives as UDMA 33, then your motherboard's
> controller is probably only a UDMA 33 controller.

I have the same thing here.
With both kernel-2.4.9-13 and kernel-2.4.13-0.5 on a DFI  CA64-TN 
motherboard:

ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with 
idebus=xx

VP_IDE: VIA vt82c686b (rev 40) IDE UDMA100 controller on pci00:07.1

ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA

hda: WDC WD205BA, ATA DISK drive
hdb: WDC AC310200R, ATA DISK drive

hda: 40088160 sectors (20525 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=2495/255/63, 
UDMA(33)
hdb: 20044080 sectors (10263 MB) w/512KiB Cache, CHS=1247/255/63, UDMA(33)

- -D

- -- 

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt

- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE78e1MeMAUbzJhSVcRApwgAJ95CNvdaQde3BaJqEKb3q94npySawCfdyzR
4ydbZq3aUpG4wnWa7fUiW3E=
=CvdD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

recompile kernel - both ext3 and ext2 support?

[BobH]

Hi,
  I am recompiling 2.4.9-13 for NAT learning and experimentation.  When I
installed RH 7.2 I chose the ext3 file system.  Now when recompiling I have
choosen ext3 file support.  Is there any reason to also incluce ext2 file
support.  I know this seems like a stupid question, but the simplest of
questions unasked has left me hanging before.

  Complile.help file doesn't help me much.

TIA

Bob



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Problem with 7.2 Upgrade: eth0 not recognized

[Mike Watson]

And where can I subscribe to the enigma-list?

mw

Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> 
> Mike Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I have a small Linux box in my office that serves for a workgroup webserver,
> > PostgreSQL server, and X server for a document search engine using HtDig. In
> > addition it's used as a limited C++ development and DHTML test box.
> >
> > This box has been running RH 7.0 for quite some time without a problem.  My group
> > is about to start a major project that will be partially RH 7.2 based.  So I
> > decided to upgrade the box.
> 
> Red Hat Linux 7.2 discussions are much better off on enigma-list.
> 
> > What a mistake.  HtDig now doesn't work, PostgreSQL doesn't like the old database
> > format
> 
> Documented. Dump first, upgrade second - stated in the release
> notes. As long as the postgresql people insist on it being that way,
> there isn't much to do about it :(
> 
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Simple VPN setup

[Dave Ihnat]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:57:16PM -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> 6.2 is ancient ;) 

Yah, but it's _damned_ stable after patches and my own code tweaks.

After 20+ years of being severely burned by Unix updates that break the
world, I'm carefully planning the next Linux upgrade and moving slowly.
-- 
  Dave "Yes, I'm paranoid.  The question is--am I paranoid ENOUGH?" Ihnat
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Map drives at login?

[Jon Jaques]

Hello Again,

Well, I see by reading this email that I'm probably "almost there"...

I prefer to keep my usernames and passwords in my WinNT4 primary domain
controller... And would LOVE to see how to get Linux to integrate with
it, and share permissions! 

Also the network volumes that I access are on NT4, on an NTFS volume, so
it should support additional permissions, unlike fat. I did try to share
up an NT network volume via apache, though, and that did not work! ;-)
I'm not surprised, but I digress!

I think that some install or the other turned off encrypted smb
passwords, I'm not sure which that was, but I'd like it turned back on,
and used by Linux, hopefully without the need to manually do the mounts
or put text passwords in files.

--Jon

Try this Matt

http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/2047/3/

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 15:08, you wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the best way to have a samba mount mount on boot up without
> the need of having the clear text password visible in the fstab file.
> The share also needs to be rw? We are using samba 2.0.7.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 22:16, Jon Jaques wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've managed to map the smb network drives that I need to folders under
> my user directory under rh7.1, but I have to manually re-do them
> everytime the system reboots (which is much less often lately, as I
> break the dependance on 'doze! Or run it with VMWare!)
> 
> But I think it fails because it requires the smb password, if I put it
> in /etc/fstab, and it can't accept or get the password during bootup.
> 
> Is there another or better way to do this? I don't want the drives to be
> shared globally, anyways, so it is better for me to do it as a user
> share, but I'm just not sure how to make it stick!
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Jon S. Jaques
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Map drives at login?

[Jon Jaques]

Hello,

I've managed to map the smb network drives that I need to folders under
my user directory under rh7.1, but I have to manually re-do them
everytime the system reboots (which is much less often lately, as I
break the dependance on 'doze! Or run it with VMWare!)

But I think it fails because it requires the smb password, if I put it
in /etc/fstab, and it can't accept or get the password during bootup.

Is there another or better way to do this? I don't want the drives to be
shared globally, anyways, so it is better for me to do it as a user
share, but I'm just not sure how to make it stick!

TIA,

Jon S. Jaques



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: pattern matching

[Gordon Messmer]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Cameron Simpson wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:48:07PM -0800, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I think you want this:
> | find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; | egrep -v "/[^/]*/"
> 
> You can make that even simpler:
>   /.*/
> No need to use [^/] there...

That's true, but I mostly quit using '.*' after some very serious 
performance problems with a Perl CGI a while back.  One '.*' is fine, but 
using more than one can cause a string to get traversed in some awful, 
awful ways.  I try to be more concise.

> Or of course the cool sed/awk O'Reilly book, which also has regexp stuff.

Absolutely.  Doesn't O'Reilly have a book on regex's specifically?

-- 
If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have,
I'd have one dollar. - Squidward to SpongeBob



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Michael Sorrentino wrote:
>Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing
[snip]

Since when? I've used IP routing in the stock kernels shipped with RH 5.1,
5.2, 6.1, and 6.2. You just have to enable it in the network
settings. What makes you think it's not compiled into the kernels shipped
with the 7.x series?

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
Chat:  AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05
Linux. The choice of a GNU Generation. 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x6C94329D

iD8DBQE78ddGpCpg3WyUI50RApKsAJ45pw5HY+9GYS3TpxjB2/LBBNzNCQCg7vEs
i/uCODLnBlgD+F/IwWM8OZ4=
=kEB9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: rpm package of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6

[Jack Bowling]

** Reply to message from Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:58:01 
-0800 (PST)


> I checked www.rpmfind.org, www.freshrpms.net, and rhcontrib.bero.org with
> no success for apache 1.3.20.  You may well need to download the source
> tarball from apache.org and compile it yourself.  Also you could take a
> look a the rpm spec file from a newer apache version in rpm format to see
> if you could derive one for your particular needs.  There doesn't appear
> to me to be an easy solution to this issue.

Just tried a google search. Here is the first of sevearl hits:

http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/engarde/people/ryan/NEW-APACHE-AND-PHP-RPMS/ 
RPMS/apache-1.3.20-2.0.0.i386.html

jb



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: rpm package of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6

[Keith Morse]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Keith Morse wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Keith Morse wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > My system is Red Hat 6.2...
> > > > So, where can I download the rpm packages of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6
> > > > for installing under 6.2 system ?
> > > > Thank for your help !
> > > >
> > > > Edward.
> > >
> > > Please check www.rpmfind.net.  There is a place to search on the opening
> > > page.
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have ever checked the rpm packages of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6 on
> > www.rpmfind.net, but there no the rpm package available for Red Hat 6.2 system
> > , I have ever tried the *.src.rpm , but also "NO" !
> > So, I post this question at the mail list that I hope that I can get any help
> > !
> 
> 
> I checked www.rpmfind.org, www.freshrpms.net, and rhcontrib.bero.org with
> no success for apache 1.3.20.  You may well need to download the source
> tarball from apache.org and compile it yourself.  Also you could take a
> look a the rpm spec file from a newer apache version in rpm format to see
> if you could derive one for your particular needs.  There doesn't appear
> to me to be an easy solution to this issue.


I can't f'ing believe it.  Minutes later and I'm on the seawolf list
and found:



http://rpms.arvin.dk/php/

and

http://rpms.arvin.dk/apache



Happy rpm'ing



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: rpm package of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6

[Keith Morse]

On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Keith Morse wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > My system is Red Hat 6.2...
> > > So, where can I download the rpm packages of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6
> > > for installing under 6.2 system ?
> > > Thank for your help !
> > >
> > > Edward.
> >
> > Please check www.rpmfind.net.  There is a place to search on the opening
> > page.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have ever checked the rpm packages of apache 1.3.20 and php 4.0.6 on
> www.rpmfind.net, but there no the rpm package available for Red Hat 6.2 system
> , I have ever tried the *.src.rpm , but also "NO" !
> So, I post this question at the mail list that I hope that I can get any help
> !


I checked www.rpmfind.org, www.freshrpms.net, and rhcontrib.bero.org with
no success for apache 1.3.20.  You may well need to download the source
tarball from apache.org and compile it yourself.  Also you could take a
look a the rpm spec file from a newer apache version in rpm format to see
if you could derive one for your particular needs.  There doesn't appear
to me to be an easy solution to this issue.






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Wayne Vosberg]

Do you have link lights on the 10.1.1 net?

Does ifconfig eth1 show the I/F in the UP state?

Can you the 10.1.1.1 I/F while on that box?

I don't see any need for ip forwarding here, what you have is:


 box 1
  eth0   eth1
   192.168.1.103   10.1.1.1
 | |
  net--192.168.1.100 - |
 | |
   192.168.1.223   10.1.1.2
  eth0eth1
  box 2



the only traffic on the eth1's will be 10.1.1.1 <-> 10.1.1.2,
everything else will go out eth0 




On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:12:45 -0800
Michael Sorrentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ah ok. Doing a "cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward" I get "1" result. So it 
> looks like it is enabled.
> 
> ok so I have
> 
> Machine one
> 
> eth0:
> Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:D0:B7:27:D9:35  
> inet addr:192.168.1.103  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> 
> 
> eth1:
> Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:01:02:CA:0F:9A  
> inet addr:10.1.1.1  Bcast:10.1.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> 
> 
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
> 192.168.1.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
> 10.1.1.0*   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
> 127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> default 192.168.1.100   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
> 
> 
> ===
> Machine 2
> 
> eth0:
> Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:10:4B:C8:12:21  
> inet addr:192.168.1.223  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> 
> 
> eth1:
> Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:01:02:72:98:BA  
> inet addr:10.1.1.2  Bcast:10.1.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> 
> 
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
> 192.168.1.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
> 10.1.1.0*   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
> 127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> default 192.168.1.100   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
> 
> End
> 
> 
> the 192.168* network has no problems. I have the 10.* network plugged into a 
> seperate hub. No gateway specified (shouldn't need) for either box. All seems 
> ok, just cant ping either machine. Any clues?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 15:54, you wrote:
> > Not necessarily, do a
> > 'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'
> >
> > if you back a 0 then it is not enabled, if you get a 1 back, it is
> > enabled. You can probably do an echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > to enable it if you wish. Otherwise, yes you will have to recompile
> > the kernel, which isn't normally a big deal. :-)
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael Sorrentino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 18:23
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Two Nic Cards
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so
> > > basically I'm dead
> > > in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> > >
> > > Thanks for the h elp
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > > > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel,
> > > > you don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> > > >
> > > > -Jason
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello all.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > > > configured as eth0 and
> > > > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > > > > is 10.1.1.0
> > > > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > > > ipchains and firewall
> > > > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > > > > route but I'm
> > > > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman

RE: Two Nic Cards

[Jason Taylor]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

ah yes, forgot to mention that...sysctl is your friend.. :-)

- -Jason


> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Parish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 19:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two Nic Cards
> 
> 
> or
> 
> just edit /etc/sysctl.conf
> and change the first line from a 0 to a 1.
> This way on every bootup ip forwarding will be enabled.
> Ray
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Jason Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:54 PM
> Subject: RE: Two Nic Cards
> 
> 
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > 
> > Not necessarily, do a 
> > 'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'
> > 
> > if you back a 0 then it is not enabled, if you get a 1 back, it
> > is enabled. You can probably do an echo 1 
> >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > to enable it if you wish. Otherwise, yes you will have to
> > recompile the kernel, which isn't normally a big deal. :-)
> > 
> > - -Jason
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael Sorrentino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 18:23
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Two Nic Cards
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jason,
> > > 
> > > Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so 
> > > basically I'm dead 
> > > in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the h elp
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > > > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the
> > > > kernel, you don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> > > >
> > > > -Jason
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello all.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > > > configured as eth0 and
> > > > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine. 
> > > > > eth1 is 10.1.1.0
> > > > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > > > ipchains and firewall
> > > > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify
> > > > > a route but I'm
> > > > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > 
> > 
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

> 
> iQEVAwUBO/Gyu5Xw4bNLLNrbAQGeCgf8DEWsJDWZt+KbPylqsTn0KD/NCe1AIAEZ
> P1GWfuNmrZpYx7U//Pjv8IueNC3zkmtKV+8Wx0oyUoV0kyRZDIJqLyR/+L5CMUao
> 1O9ycWi41Z4nkPGxxBDMe3M4KX+ah4NAr7coBlZE2gxRed4WZ7pjqI1s3Yn/TW5R
> U0XZ6S3a1pMrXmymQMp5o3G2cx/8FXvW47YFvNjcbVw0S+usAF91XwwlU+yGh3OY
> oD0g+v63LB4NgVKQrVgoa52sex2yS2eu2r+9YklfYciQcd60cTPVZNDMTOkUGxvK
> KSpU24l/Xh/KGc5qwiEyFefpnN7mCfTyc63edK+6Vm6E/rr3xdpR1Q==
> =APDG
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

iQEVAwUBO/G6xpXw4bNLLNrbAQEsrwf/c6yplnkzy3FsQBUbIbtVM1I2GBtIxKK5
tkUhXUd7E7Ec32bRotRoCXHIE2KDmCI+bW5edBFTPUBFM90Adk2wEHnJHbIpN1l+
h7WNlZS25+NjQkUJHakMbpaJ2RHEYp7GBcbY5ZTbgURtZ06goGKu0aTq3gx6EMbx
GvgMrvNDGVjihRMnoMY9d+EykRZd9L0FcO1TryGw7/BWq+s3q/6c2OVJnk9wlQhu
LBWOeQxf3gSXjnt+h9zt2m8V2HpkZJqaZtEg8EmalzRlvsGMq3y8RN6AziGgLZ0L
F2QCk/w5EDHAqrDqEmMqHnG/3+T1Dg7aW1p/12U/tCCHHSGW34Cx/Q==
=XLrR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Ray Parish]

or

just edit /etc/sysctl.conf
and change the first line from a 0 to a 1.
This way on every bootup ip forwarding will be enabled.
Ray


- Original Message - 
From: "Jason Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:54 PM
Subject: RE: Two Nic Cards


> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Not necessarily, do a 
> 'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'
> 
> if you back a 0 then it is not enabled, if you get a 1 back, it is
> enabled. You can probably do an echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> to enable it if you wish. Otherwise, yes you will have to recompile
> the kernel, which isn't normally a big deal. :-)
> 
> - -Jason
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Sorrentino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 18:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Two Nic Cards
> > 
> > 
> > Jason,
> > 
> > Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so 
> > basically I'm dead 
> > in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> > 
> > Thanks for the h elp
> > 
> > 
> > On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel,
> > > you don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> > >
> > > -Jason
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello all.
> > > >
> > > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > > configured as eth0 and
> > > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > > > is 10.1.1.0
> > > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > > ipchains and firewall
> > > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > > > route but I'm
> > > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 
> 
> iQEVAwUBO/Gyu5Xw4bNLLNrbAQGeCgf8DEWsJDWZt+KbPylqsTn0KD/NCe1AIAEZ
> P1GWfuNmrZpYx7U//Pjv8IueNC3zkmtKV+8Wx0oyUoV0kyRZDIJqLyR/+L5CMUao
> 1O9ycWi41Z4nkPGxxBDMe3M4KX+ah4NAr7coBlZE2gxRed4WZ7pjqI1s3Yn/TW5R
> U0XZ6S3a1pMrXmymQMp5o3G2cx/8FXvW47YFvNjcbVw0S+usAF91XwwlU+yGh3OY
> oD0g+v63LB4NgVKQrVgoa52sex2yS2eu2r+9YklfYciQcd60cTPVZNDMTOkUGxvK
> KSpU24l/Xh/KGc5qwiEyFefpnN7mCfTyc63edK+6Vm6E/rr3xdpR1Q==
> =APDG
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Layout editing software

[Wayne Vosberg]

see http://www.lyx.org/  for a great document processor using LaTeX.


On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:38:20 -0800
Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For documents which are mostly text, I don't think anything beats LaTeX
> http://www.latex-project.org.  The output looks like Gutenberg himself
> set the type.  Of course, if you haven't used LaTeX before, it'll take
> some time to learn.  But it'll be a good investment.  Good luck,
> 
> 
> 
> Hidong
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > Does anyone know a good layout / setting software that will do similar things
> > like Adobe Pagemaker for windows, or Quarks for Mac?
> > Any suggestion at all?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Reuben D. Budiardja
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Michael Sorrentino]

Ah ok. Doing a "cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward" I get "1" result. So it 
looks like it is enabled.

ok so I have

Machine one

eth0:
Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:D0:B7:27:D9:35  
inet addr:192.168.1.103  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0


eth1:
Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:01:02:CA:0F:9A  
inet addr:10.1.1.1  Bcast:10.1.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0


Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.1.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
10.1.1.0*   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default 192.168.1.100   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0


===
Machine 2

eth0:
Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:10:4B:C8:12:21  
inet addr:192.168.1.223  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0


eth1:
Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:01:02:72:98:BA  
inet addr:10.1.1.2  Bcast:10.1.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0


Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
192.168.1.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
10.1.1.0*   255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
127.0.0.0   *   255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
default 192.168.1.100   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0

End


the 192.168* network has no problems. I have the 10.* network plugged into a 
seperate hub. No gateway specified (shouldn't need) for either box. All seems 
ok, just cant ping either machine. Any clues?









On Tuesday 13 November 2001 15:54, you wrote:
> Not necessarily, do a
> 'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'
>
> if you back a 0 then it is not enabled, if you get a 1 back, it is
> enabled. You can probably do an echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> to enable it if you wish. Otherwise, yes you will have to recompile
> the kernel, which isn't normally a big deal. :-)
>
> -Jason
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Sorrentino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 18:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Two Nic Cards
> >
> >
> > Jason,
> >
> > Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so
> > basically I'm dead
> > in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> >
> > Thanks for the h elp
> >
> > On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel,
> > > you don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> > >
> > > -Jason
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello all.
> > > >
> > > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > > configured as eth0 and
> > > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > > > is 10.1.1.0
> > > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > > ipchains and firewall
> > > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > > > route but I'm
> > > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 



Michael Sorrentino
Network Operations
Rightway Gate, INC
888-398-4703



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Layout editing software

[Jack Bowling]

Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> Does anyone know a good layout / setting software that will do similar things
> like Adobe Pagemaker for windows, or Quarks for Mac?
> Any suggestion at all?

Go to freshmeat.net and search on Scribus.

jb



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Layout editing software

[Hidong Kim]

For documents which are mostly text, I don't think anything beats LaTeX
http://www.latex-project.org.  The output looks like Gutenberg himself
set the type.  Of course, if you haven't used LaTeX before, it'll take
some time to learn.  But it'll be a good investment.  Good luck,



Hidong





Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> Does anyone know a good layout / setting software that will do similar things
> like Adobe Pagemaker for windows, or Quarks for Mac?
> Any suggestion at all?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> Reuben D. Budiardja
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!

[Dan Egli]

He wanted a version #. Did no one think of:
rpm -qa | grep kernel?

That will return all the versions of a kernel installed, then he can isolate
the correct one and rpm -e the others. i.e. rpm -e kernel-1.2.3-4
kernel-1.2.3-5 kernel-1.5.7-6 kernel-1.5.8-3


- Original Message -
From: "John Thayer Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!


> Excellent idea!  I will try that.
>
> jj
> - Original Message -
> From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:29 AM
> Subject: Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!
>
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > > Yeah.  This technique I had thought of.  Scared me slightly.  I just
> > > wondered whether there wasn't an easier way.
> >
> > > > rpm -e --allmatches kernel
> >
> >  Maybe add --justdb as well, and afterwards do a single
install --justdb.
> >
> > Bye,
> >
> > Leonard.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Layout editing software

[Reuben D Budiardja]

Hi,
Does anyone know a good layout / setting software that will do similar things 
like Adobe Pagemaker for windows, or Quarks for Mac?
Any suggestion at all?

Thanks in advance.
Reuben D. Budiardja



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Problem with 7.2 Upgrade: eth0 not recognized

[Trond Eivind Glomsrød]

Mike Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have a small Linux box in my office that serves for a workgroup webserver,
> PostgreSQL server, and X server for a document search engine using HtDig. In
> addition it's used as a limited C++ development and DHTML test box.
> 
> This box has been running RH 7.0 for quite some time without a problem.  My group
> is about to start a major project that will be partially RH 7.2 based.  So I
> decided to upgrade the box.

Red Hat Linux 7.2 discussions are much better off on enigma-list.
 
> What a mistake.  HtDig now doesn't work, PostgreSQL doesn't like the old database
> format

Documented. Dump first, upgrade second - stated in the release
notes. As long as the postgresql people insist on it being that way,
there isn't much to do about it :(

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Problem with 7.2 Upgrade: eth0 not recognized

[Jason Taylor]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

You can try recompiling the kernel for support for your NIC. I am
quite certain the 503 is in there, you might be able to insmod it if
it is built as a module.

- -Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 18:51
> To: Red Hat Mail List
> Subject: Problem with 7.2 Upgrade: eth0 not recognized
> 
> 
> I have a small Linux box in my office that serves for a 
> workgroup webserver,
> PostgreSQL server, and X server for a document search engine 
> using HtDig. In
> addition it's used as a limited C++ development and DHTML test box.
> 
> This box has been running RH 7.0 for quite some time without 
> a problem.  My group
> is about to start a major project that will be partially RH 
> 7.2 based.  So I
> decided to upgrade the box.
> 
> What a mistake.  HtDig now doesn't work, PostgreSQL doesn't 
> like the old database
> format, X didn't work initially, and the NIC card isn't being 
> recognized.  I got
> X to work by switching from a DHCP supplied IP to a static IP 
> address.  That's
> when I discovered the onboard NIC (3Com 503 type) isn't being 
> recognized.  I can
> go into Network Config and reconfig the hostname, ip address, 
> netmask, etc., but
> that doesn't help much.  When I reboot L0 is found but not 
> eth0.  I once got the
> card up by issuing "ifconfig eth0 up".  But it won't come up 
> automatically.  This
> has got me puzzled.
> 
> Anyone have any idea what happened and how I can fix it?
> 
> Mike W
> Raymore, MO
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

iQEVAwUBO/GzXJXw4bNLLNrbAQEndAgAsxEZdJRKVk34kPqgh8n71Lwr3fsNK+Y7
izIbAAGfc1p0IKE5NnTmGpD2TMHC3DQ3oMBKigtjwUeNEUG7kLL5jNCwSEXgXwiW
kV4hlZgt7jAZ/wVCBBvLHy7YhrtvqAKdB1vEgtqjAeouqOmm8v5gnNBcST8gOyno
xCGoepfZ5oLr3SZ4MhkSe2CJ5qnInzbYMIVKpvhzwpvxao9P4wRNPYXYADkoYAFz
mOgA8vsZlUUOqWGObHgeweMMZD3W+lwzdRfBC+LeI7Pu+Su58aPVlxCvbeBJasRo
v2/Wq1y6weGtchst8aOlxCmJRB9QHmq2sCB1g/baVQ7M1jI+k+b+tA==
=RVU3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Problem with 7.2 Upgrade: eth0 not recognized

[Mike Watson]

I have a small Linux box in my office that serves for a workgroup webserver,
PostgreSQL server, and X server for a document search engine using HtDig. In
addition it's used as a limited C++ development and DHTML test box.

This box has been running RH 7.0 for quite some time without a problem.  My group
is about to start a major project that will be partially RH 7.2 based.  So I
decided to upgrade the box.

What a mistake.  HtDig now doesn't work, PostgreSQL doesn't like the old database
format, X didn't work initially, and the NIC card isn't being recognized.  I got
X to work by switching from a DHCP supplied IP to a static IP address.  That's
when I discovered the onboard NIC (3Com 503 type) isn't being recognized.  I can
go into Network Config and reconfig the hostname, ip address, netmask, etc., but
that doesn't help much.  When I reboot L0 is found but not eth0.  I once got the
card up by issuing "ifconfig eth0 up".  But it won't come up automatically.  This
has got me puzzled.

Anyone have any idea what happened and how I can fix it?

Mike W
Raymore, MO



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Two Nic Cards

[Jason Taylor]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Not necessarily, do a 
'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'

if you back a 0 then it is not enabled, if you get a 1 back, it is
enabled. You can probably do an echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
to enable it if you wish. Otherwise, yes you will have to recompile
the kernel, which isn't normally a big deal. :-)

- -Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Sorrentino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 18:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two Nic Cards
> 
> 
> Jason,
> 
> Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so 
> basically I'm dead 
> in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> 
> Thanks for the h elp
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel,
> > you don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello all.
> > >
> > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > configured as eth0 and
> > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > > is 10.1.1.0
> > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > ipchains and firewall
> > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > > route but I'm
> > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

iQEVAwUBO/Gyu5Xw4bNLLNrbAQGeCgf8DEWsJDWZt+KbPylqsTn0KD/NCe1AIAEZ
P1GWfuNmrZpYx7U//Pjv8IueNC3zkmtKV+8Wx0oyUoV0kyRZDIJqLyR/+L5CMUao
1O9ycWi41Z4nkPGxxBDMe3M4KX+ah4NAr7coBlZE2gxRed4WZ7pjqI1s3Yn/TW5R
U0XZ6S3a1pMrXmymQMp5o3G2cx/8FXvW47YFvNjcbVw0S+usAF91XwwlU+yGh3OY
oD0g+v63LB4NgVKQrVgoa52sex2yS2eu2r+9YklfYciQcd60cTPVZNDMTOkUGxvK
KSpU24l/Xh/KGc5qwiEyFefpnN7mCfTyc63edK+6Vm6E/rr3xdpR1Q==
=APDG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Mike Burger]

That's not necessarily true.  If it's a stock kernel, I'm fairly sure it's 
compiled in.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Michael Sorrentino wrote:

> Jason,
> 
> Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so basically I'm dead 
> in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> 
> Thanks for the h elp
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel, you
> > don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello all.
> > >
> > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > configured as eth0 and
> > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > > is 10.1.1.0
> > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > ipchains and firewall
> > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > > route but I'm
> > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Wayne Vosberg]

I haven't tried 7.2 yet but prior versions had it.  Try

# echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward



On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:23:17 -0800
Michael Sorrentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jason,
> 
> Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so basically I'm dead 
> in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(
> 
> Thanks for the h elp
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> > you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel, you
> > don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello all.
> > >
> > > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > > configured as eth0 and
> > > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > > is 10.1.1.0
> > > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > > ipchains and firewall
> > > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > > route but I'm
> > > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Two Nic Cards

[Michael Sorrentino]

Jason,

Looks like the RH kernel isn't compiled with IP routing so basically I'm dead 
in the water without compiling a custom Kernel ;(

Thanks for the h elp


On Tuesday 13 November 2001 12:20, you wrote:
> you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel, you
> don't need firewalling, just IP routing.
>
> -Jason
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Two Nic Cards
> >
> >
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes,
> > configured as eth0 and
> > eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1
> > is 10.1.1.0
> > network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are
> > configured as 10.1.1.1
> > and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the
> > ipchains and firewall
> > stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a
> > route but I'm
> > not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Mounting smbfs securely in fstab

[Michael Sorrentino]

Try this Matt

http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/2047/3/

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 15:08, you wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the best way to have a samba mount mount on boot up without
> the need of having the clear text password visible in the fstab file.
> The share also needs to be rw? We are using samba 2.0.7.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: pattern matching

[Cameron Simpson]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:48:07PM -0800, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I think you want this:
| 
| find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; | egrep -v "/[^/]*/"

You can make that even simpler:

/.*/

No need to use [^/] there...

| > Would somebody please point me in the direction for finding out how
| > pattern matching works.
| 
| Pick up any book on perl, or see any online tutorial on the language.  
| Since regular expressions are considered the "core" of the language, they 
| get a lot of attention and are explained very well to Perl programmers.

Or of course the cool sed/awk O'Reilly book, which also has regexp stuff.
-- 
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

As a computer journalist, he's a good travel writer.
- Ian Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about Gareth Powell



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Mounting smbfs securely in fstab

[Matthew Simpson]

Hi All,

What is the best way to have a samba mount mount on boot up without 
the need of having the clear text password visible in the fstab file. 
The share also needs to be rw? We are using samba 2.0.7.

Thanks,

Matt



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

samba & kernel

[Ezra Nugroho]

I am having a problem with samba at redhat 7.2.
I am using samba 2.2.1a from RH 7.2 CD.

When I used the kernel that comes with RH installation, both smbd and nmbd 
are working fine.
When I used costumised kernels (2.4.12-ac6 and 2.4.14) none of them work.
Both daemons can actually be ran fine, but whenever I want to mount a share 
from other machine the connection was refused.
Note: the same smb.conf works with RH kernel.

I know I included smb filesystem support, but I think that is used only if 
I want to mount smb share from somewhere else.
Is there anything in kernel configuration that I could probably missed?
What else could be wrong?




Ezra Nugroho
Web/Database Application Specialist
Goshen College ITS
Phone: (219) 535-7706


"Don't be humble, you're not that great." -- Golda Meir



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: pattern matching

[Gordon Messmer]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, dave brett wrote:

> This command works the way I want it too:
>  find / -type d -maxdepth 1 
> 
> This does not 
>  find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \;
> It gave the size of all  directories.

That's what it's supposed to do... Try:
find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du -s {} \;

I think that's what you're trying to do.

> find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; |grep "\/[a-z,A-Z,0-9]^[\/]
> 
> The pattern matching did not work the way I expected it to.  What I wanted
> was it to reject all lines with a second "/".

I think you want this:

find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; | egrep -v "/[^/]*/"

If you're trying to ignore certain lines, then use "grep -v" for lines 
that don't match the pattern.  It's much easier than trying to craft a 
regex that won't match the lines you don't want in this case, since that 
would look something like this:

find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; | \
egrep "^[:digit:]*[:space:]*/[^/]*$"

In this case, the regex must encompass the whole of the line, and define 
every aspect of what is acceptable.

> Would somebody please point me in the direction for finding out how
> pattern matching works.

Pick up any book on perl, or see any online tutorial on the language.  
Since regular expressions are considered the "core" of the language, they 
get a lot of attention and are explained very well to Perl programmers.


-- 
If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have,
I'd have one dollar. - Squidward to SpongeBob



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: pattern matching

[Wayne Vosberg]

Your find is just fine.  It's du that's traversing your subdirectories.
Try:

# find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du -s {} \;



On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:04:34 -0600 (CST)
dave brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Pattern matching is drivingg me nuts.
> 
> This command works the way I want it too:
>  find / -type d -maxdepth 1 
> 
> This does not 
>  find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \;
> It gave the size of all  directories.
> 
> So then I tried 
> 
> find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; |grep "\/[a-z,A-Z,0-9]^[\/]
> 
> The pattern matching did not work the way I expected it to.  What I wanted
> was it to reject all lines with a second "/".
> 
> Would somebody please point me in the direction for finding out how
> pattern matching works.
> 
> By the way, I quickly realized my mistake in getting what I was after.
> The command which did what I wanted (size of each directory)
>  find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du --max-depth=0 {} \;
> 
> thanks
> david
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Simple VPN setup

[Jon Jaques]

Hey Cool,

Thank you very much! Just read over your post, and found it very
useful!!! Saved me from re-asking the same question.

Have a good one!

--Jon

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 03:49, Thierry ITTY wrote:
> > I am thinking about setting up what I would consider a simple VPN.  I have
> >two IP'masqed RedHat 7.2 boxes at two locations.  I want to make the
> >machines behind them look like they are on the same network.  Is there a
> >relatively easy and secure way of doing this?  Seems fairly simple, but most
> >documentation that I have come across seems complex.  Any good suggestions?
> 
> I'd suggest CIPE
> 
> I think people see VPNs as a complex thing because they just don't know the
> way it works
> in the case of CIPE (others system too, i guess), you just get a new
> network interface on each computer, and the two interfaces are in the same
> ip subnet. think of it in the same manner as ppp provides a ppp0 interface
> and a link over a telephony network, no matter how complex this sub layer
> is : cipe provides a cipb0 interface and a link over an ip sub-layer (ther
> internet, actually).
> a basic configuration would be : 
> private network 1 <-> lanbox 1 <-> internet <-> internet <-> internet <->
> lanbox 2 <-> private network 2
> 
> adding a VPN between lanbox 1 and lanbox 2 just "hides" the internet sub
> layer and shrinks the configuration to :
> private network 1 <-> lanbox 1 <-> lanbox 2 <-> private network 2
> 
> now, suppose your private network 1 has IP subnet #1, private network 2 IP
> subnet #2, and the VPN adds an IP subnet #3 between the lanboxes. then the
> routing configuration is obvious : set a static route to subnet #2 on
> lanbox 1 via lanbox 2's cipb0 ip address (ie lanbox 2's ip address in
> subnet #3) and conversely a static route to subnet #1 on lanbox2 via lanbox
> 1's cipb0 ip address. of course i guess that private network 1 machines
> have already a default route that points to lanbox 1 and conversely for
> private network 2 machines.
> 
> now, you have a total control over routes and you can make private subnets
> communicate easily and securely.
> 
> of course, lanbox 1 and lanbox 2 can be configured to NAT outgoing packets
> which do not concern private to private traffic.
> 
> so to make short consider a vpn as a new point-to-point link. isn't it
> finally easy ?
>   - * - * - * - * - * - * -
> Si nous avons chacun un objet et que nous les echangeons, 
>nous avons encore chacun un objet.
> Si nous avons chacun une idee et que nous les echangeons,
>nous avons alors chacun deux idees.
> 
> Thierry ITTY
> eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] FRANCE
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: SMP and Redhat.

[Hidong Kim]

Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> 
> > no.  I can't remember now, but I think there's an SMP check box during
> > the installation.
> 
> It's detected automatically.

You guys have thought of everything!



> 
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: SMP and Redhat.

[Trond Eivind Glomsrød]

Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Based on my experiences with SMP from Red Hat 5.1 to 6.2, which I'm
> currently running, I can say that the answer to question 4 is a big fat
> no.  I can't remember now, but I think there's an SMP check box during
> the installation. 

It's detected automatically.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: SMP and Redhat.

[Hidong Kim]

Based on my experiences with SMP from Red Hat 5.1 to 6.2, which I'm
currently running, I can say that the answer to question 4 is a big fat
no.  I can't remember now, but I think there's an SMP check box during
the installation.  Or dual processors may be detected automatically
during installation.  When recompiling the kernel for SMP, just select
SMP support.  Make sure, however, that the lot numbers on both
processors are the same.  If this dual processor machine was a
manufacturer's configuration, you should be fine.  Good luck,





[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I'm upgrading to a dual proc P2 333 system for my redhat server...but I have
> a few questions...
> 
> 1) Does RedHat 7.2 support smp out of the box?
> 2) Can I split processes against the processors?
> 3) How much memory will i need?
> 4) Is this going to be a frustrating exercise (rhetorical)?
> 
> thanks
> 
> Carl Engstrom
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: SMP and Redhat.

[Trond Eivind Glomsrød]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> I'm upgrading to a dual proc P2 333 system for my redhat server...but I have
> a few questions...
> 
> 1) Does RedHat 7.2 support smp out of the box?

Yes, Red Hat Linux 7.2 ("Red Hat" (note space) is the name of the company,
not the product) supports SMP out of the box.

> 2) Can I split processes against the processors?

Scheduling is done automatically.

> 3) How much memory will i need?

Depends on what you'll run.

> 4) Is this going to be a frustrating exercise (rhetorical)?

Not if your hardware is nice.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: SMP and Redhat.

[Hal Burgiss]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 05:06:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm upgrading to a dual proc P2 333 system for my redhat server...but I have
> a few questions...
> 
> 1) Does RedHat 7.2 support smp out of the box?

Yes, there are SMP kernels. RH has supported SMP since way, way back.

> 2) Can I split processes against the processors?

Nope, if you are meaning to specify which processor a process runs on.
???

> 3) How much memory will i need?

Just depends on what you are doing :/ My rule of thumb 'as much as
possible'. Assuming you are running X, I'd say you can do it with 64M
OK, you'll be happier at 128M, but with the prices where they are I'd
go for > 256M myself.

> 4) Is this going to be a frustrating exercise (rhetorical)?

Doubtful. I don't see SMP being a problem unless the MB is el wierdo.

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: ide bus speed not optimal?

[Gordon Messmer]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, christopher j bottaro wrote:

> ide: Assuming 33MHz PCI bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
> hda: 78165360 sectors (40021 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=4865/255/63, UDMA(33)
> 
> but my hard drives are UDMA 100, how do i get them to run at optimal speed?

What kernel are you running?  What motherboard?

If the kernel reports the drives as UDMA 33, then your motherboard's 
controller is probably only a UDMA 33 controller.

-- 
If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have,
I'd have one dollar. - Squidward to SpongeBob



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

SMP and Redhat.

[Engstrom_Carl]

I'm upgrading to a dual proc P2 333 system for my redhat server...but I have
a few questions...

1) Does RedHat 7.2 support smp out of the box?
2) Can I split processes against the processors?
3) How much memory will i need?
4) Is this going to be a frustrating exercise (rhetorical)?

thanks

Carl Engstrom



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

pattern matching

[dave brett]

Pattern matching is drivingg me nuts.

This command works the way I want it too:
 find / -type d -maxdepth 1 

This does not 
 find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \;
It gave the size of all  directories.

So then I tried 

find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du {} \; |grep "\/[a-z,A-Z,0-9]^[\/]

The pattern matching did not work the way I expected it to.  What I wanted
was it to reject all lines with a second "/".

Would somebody please point me in the direction for finding out how
pattern matching works.

By the way, I quickly realized my mistake in getting what I was after.
The command which did what I wanted (size of each directory)
 find / -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec du --max-depth=0 {} \;

thanks
david



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Simple VPN setup

[Trond Eivind Glomsrød]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> On 12 Nov 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
> 
> > "Derek Del Conte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > >   I am thinking about setting up what I would consider a simple VPN.  I have
> > > two IP'masqed RedHat 7.2 boxes at two locations.  I want to make the
> > > machines behind them look like they are on the same network.  Is there a
> > > relatively easy and secure way of doing this?  Seems fairly simple, but most
> > > documentation that I have come across seems complex.  Any good suggestions?
> > 
> > CIPE can solve that, and is included.
> 
> How about for 6.2? I can't find it.

6.2 is ancient ;) - it was added for RHL 7.
-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Simple VPN setup

[cgalpin]

On 12 Nov 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:

> "Derek Del Conte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am thinking about setting up what I would consider a simple VPN.  I have
> > two IP'masqed RedHat 7.2 boxes at two locations.  I want to make the
> > machines behind them look like they are on the same network.  Is there a
> > relatively easy and secure way of doing this?  Seems fairly simple, but most
> > documentation that I have come across seems complex.  Any good suggestions?
> 
> CIPE can solve that, and is included.

How about for 6.2? I can't find it.

thanks
charles



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!

[John Thayer Jensen]

Excellent idea!  I will try that.

jj
- Original Message - 
From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!


> Hi John,
> 
> > Yeah.  This technique I had thought of.  Scared me slightly.  I just
> > wondered whether there wasn't an easier way.
> 
> > > rpm -e --allmatches kernel
> 
>  Maybe add --justdb as well, and afterwards do a single install --justdb.
> 
> Bye,
> 
> Leonard.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

gdm .Xauthority problem with nfs

[Eric Prescott]

I have seen this problem for some time but no real answer on what the
correct fix is.

When hooking a RedHat 7.2 machine (also seen with with 7.1 6.2 6.0) to a
network and using nis and nfs for user auth and home dir logins using the
graphical gnome login fail. It seems to be a problem with the gdm not
being able to write to the .Xauthority file.  After installing Ximian this
problem goes away.  I have not been able to determin what is changed to
fix this...   I dont want to have to keep instaling ximian on all of my
machines.

Is there a simple config change that I can make some place?

Thoughts?

Thanks
-
Eric Prescott   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   (814)-863-1142
Sr. Systems Analyst, PSU Computer Science & Eng., 123-B Pond Lab
-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hi John,

> Yeah.  This technique I had thought of.  Scared me slightly.  I just
> wondered whether there wasn't an easier way.

> > rpm -e --allmatches kernel

 Maybe add --justdb as well, and afterwards do a single install --justdb.

Bye,

Leonard.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Two Nic Cards

[Jason Taylor]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

you need to make sure that IP routing is enabled in the kernel, you
don't need firewalling, just IP routing. 

- -Jason


> -Original Message-
> From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 15:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Two Nic Cards
> 
> 
> Hello all.
> 
> I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes, 
> configured as eth0 and 
> eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1 
> is 10.1.1.0 
> network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are 
> configured as 10.1.1.1 
> and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the 
> ipchains and firewall 
> stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a 
> route but I'm 
> not sure how. Any help is appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

iQEVAwUBO/GAh5Xw4bNLLNrbAQFv+ggAwTNTTCtoIq8sJH6yos4yzEiQ5ENRxNvS
FTWVmm+9qCfBvaG0DEnlzbcDqg7iGWWG/ckDdMytaLAIRcB/SbTM4/6gu/IZoGKP
xICofOfVijGIVYXVLoUQLYblJNxSIamU01eNEcl4uwLBVTWhYYk1+Pl6sZ8KLTVH
tjS2l+0Kiix44LQx4HAcyuX/KEbiCy4CH18UyEcTLq7Nlmj0drsNViXcRlFPK3OX
vfdyr5e9zlLvm5gt0Vf8n05OH8/zdPPwsnGfKUtRPGAzgOkVcV6iC9ZG0NFfeKTT
Wf27wcw20c6jFEcM2M19uH9TPfE/RGXTDWsUnbQ/6lFd5ZDkRvkd2A==
=0MhM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Two Nic Cards

[Michael]

Hello all.

I've got two nic cards in and working on two boxes, configured as eth0 and 
eth1.  eth0 network is the 192.168.1.0 and works fine.  eth1 is 10.1.1.0 
network and I can't ping across it. Both machines are configured as 10.1.1.1 
and 10.1.1.2.  I've looked at the network guide but the ipchains and firewall 
stuff makes it confusing. I think I simply need to specify a route but I'm 
not sure how. Any help is appreciated.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!

[John Thayer Jensen]

Yeah.  This technique I had thought of.  Scared me slightly.  I just
wondered whether there wasn't an easier way.

jj
- Original Message -
From: "Ray Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!


> > "jtj" == John Thayer Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jtj> I have 5 identical copies of kernel-2.4.9-13 on my Redhat 7.2.  This
was a
> jtj> result of a bug (Bugzilla number 55633) in up2date for Redhat 7.2.
If one
> jtj> had (I had) earlier versions of the same package (in this case, the
kernel)
> jtj> installed, then each time up2date ran it installed yet another
version of
> jtj> the latest.
>
> jtj> I got rid of all the earlier versions of the kernel, so now it no
longer
> jtj> adds duplicates.  Is there any way to remove all but one copy of this
same
> jtj> version?  I see in the rpm man pages that one can remove rpm installs
by
> jtj> install number - but I don't see how to find out the install numbers
for my
> jtj> five copies.
>
>
> Make sure you have a good kernel to boot from or a boot floppy then
>
> rpm -e --allmatches kernel
>
> Of course at this point you will have to re-install only one copy of
> the kernel yo want.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ray Curtis Unix Programmer/Consultant   Curtis Consulting
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ccux.com
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: multiple copies of same kernel??!!

[Ray Curtis]

> "jtj" == John Thayer Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

jtj> I have 5 identical copies of kernel-2.4.9-13 on my Redhat 7.2.  This was a
jtj> result of a bug (Bugzilla number 55633) in up2date for Redhat 7.2.  If one
jtj> had (I had) earlier versions of the same package (in this case, the kernel)
jtj> installed, then each time up2date ran it installed yet another version of
jtj> the latest.

jtj> I got rid of all the earlier versions of the kernel, so now it no longer
jtj> adds duplicates.  Is there any way to remove all but one copy of this same
jtj> version?  I see in the rpm man pages that one can remove rpm installs by
jtj> install number - but I don't see how to find out the install numbers for my
jtj> five copies.


Make sure you have a good kernel to boot from or a boot floppy then 

rpm -e --allmatches kernel

Of course at this point you will have to re-install only one copy of 
the kernel yo want.




-- 
Ray Curtis Unix Programmer/Consultant   Curtis Consulting
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ccux.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: resolv.conf

[Statux]

When most of the traffic follows US business hours (heavy during the day 
during the week, less at night, less on weekends; all from the 
perspective of a US citizen) it's sufficient to say what I said. Not to 
mention that, per capita, the US has more internet-linked terminals that 
most of the world.

Don't take offense to it. I read the original messages as spam.. but I did 
offer help to the actual problem.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mariusz Pekala wrote:

> On Tue 13. November 2001 10:11, you (Rodolfo J. Paiz) wrote:
> > At 11/13/2001 09:23 AM +0100, you wrote:
> > >On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:57:03AM -0500, Statux wrote:
> > > > You aren't going to get an immediate response, especially since this
> > > > list is based in the USA where it's the middle of the night right now.
> > > > So keep your shirt on :)
> > >
> > >I beg to differ - the list server might be in the US, but "the list"
> > > isn't, for a good part...
> >
> > I agree. I spend 50% of my time in Brazil and 30% in Guatemala; I'm only in
> > the USA about 10% (10% others). The world has ceased to be easily divisible
> > by simple geography.
> 
> Yeah!
> I'm 100% in the Europe and 0% in USA :-))
> 
> 
> 

-- 
-Statux



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

mouse/window events dropped, sawfish? XFree86-4.1.0?

[Mike Blatchley]

For the past couple releases of RedHat, I have attempted to use the new 
default window manager, sawfish.  However, I end up reverting back to 
enlightenment because of a problem I haven't been able to track down.  

When my laptop is *not* plugged into the network, sawfish will often miss mouse
movements from one window into another and doesn't focus the new window.  Many
times, after rapid movement between 2 windows, both of the windows title bars
will become highlighted indicating they each have the focus, but obviously only
one can.  For whatever reason, when I am connected to the network, this is not 
happening as often.

Additionally, if I revert back to enlightenment, I can operate on or off the 
network.  I vaguely recall that even enlightenment has done this on rare 
occasions which might suggest that the root problem is in XFree86, but sawfish 
sure brings it out.

Has anyone seen anything like this or have some suggestions.  Some machine 
specifics:

   RedHat 7.2
   Machine: IBM ThinkPad A22p
   Graphics: ATI Rage 128 Mobility LF (AGP), "r128" module
   XFree86-4.1.0-3

Thanks,

Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

multiple copies of same kernel??!!

[John Thayer Jensen]

I have 5 identical copies of kernel-2.4.9-13 on my Redhat 7.2.  This was a
result of a bug (Bugzilla number 55633) in up2date for Redhat 7.2.  If one
had (I had) earlier versions of the same package (in this case, the kernel)
installed, then each time up2date ran it installed yet another version of
the latest.

I got rid of all the earlier versions of the kernel, so now it no longer
adds duplicates.  Is there any way to remove all but one copy of this same
version?  I see in the rpm man pages that one can remove rpm installs by
install number - but I don't see how to find out the install numbers for my
five copies.

jj

John Thayer Jensen, System Administrator
School of Commerce, University of Auckland



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

ERR in /proc/interrupts

[Ed Wilts]

[ewilts@linux1 ewilts]$ cat /proc/interrupts
   CPU0
  0:   92046702  XT-PIC  timer
  1: 153621  XT-PIC  keyboard
  2:  0  XT-PIC  cascade
  3:  17974  XT-PIC  serial
  7: 135554  XT-PIC  usb-uhci
  8:  1  XT-PIC  rtc
 10:4373444  XT-PIC  eth0, via82cxxx
 11:3265759  XT-PIC  ide2, ide3
 12:2118326  XT-PIC  PS/2 Mouse
 15:   20010804  XT-PIC  ide1
NMI:  0
ERR:736

Can anyone explain just what the ERR signifies?  This is from a 7.2 system. 
I'd appreciate any pointers to where I can get the details on this error.

Thanks,
.../Ed
-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: poor performance on 7.2

[Ezra Nugroho]

I don't think it is an AMD thing, because I had (maybe still has??) that 
problem running intel PII.
Initially I thought it was KDE that slows things down, but GNOME was also slow.
I tried kernel 2.4.12-ac6, and it didn't really do the trick.

I just tried 2.4.14 and it seems to behave better. It seems to cache memory 
to swap more responsively.
So far I am happy with it, but I haven't tried it for long.

At 06:32 AM 11/13/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>   Fred,
>
> > > >> On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 10:52, Meph Istopheles wrote:
> > > >>   I had it running on an AMD k6-2 with 256MB RAM, & it was slower on a
> > > >> similar box with 7.1 & 128MB RAM.  I also have 7.2 on my P-III 500 
> with
> > > >> 256MB RAM, & it's fine -- no worse than when I was running 6.2 or 
> 7.1 on
> > > >> this box.  Odd.
>
> > > > Are you thinking that it's a AMD thing?
>
> > >   I suspect as much, but it may be the mb.  Don't remember off-hand, but
> > > I think the same one is in each (both came from the same place, & I
> > > think the only differece is the hard drive size).  I'm planning on
> > > redoing the one with 128MB with 7.2 eventually, so, we'll see.
>
> > One of the systems I complained about in my original post is a K6-2/350.
>
>   I vaguely remember that;-).
>
> > I'll have to check and see which kernel the 7.2 installer puts on there.
>
>   Well, while the AMD box I'd installed the 7.2 on is now only running
>W2K, the other is running RH 7.1.  I thought this might be a good point,
>but I just checked, & the only kernel installed is i386.  I can't say
>when I'll get to it, but I'll try a generic kernel before I give up on
>any 7.x on it.  The box is for my girl friend's daughter, who's moving
>in with us next summer (got it for other reasons, as well), & I really
>don't want her running all those trojans-waiting to happen in Windows.
>Hope I can make it work with Linux.
>
>Maybe RH 6.2 & a generic kernel
>
> > > >>> It IS faster, though, now that I have upgraded the kernel to 
> 2.4.9-12,
> > > >>> and force the controler into ata66 mode!
>
> > I'd like to find a RH-patched 2.4.14 or .15, so we can get the new VM.
>
>   My real problem with RH's kernels is only that their bloated.  You
>might considere, as you'll be compiling a new one anyway, going
>generic.  You'll find that customization is that much more controllable.
>
>   Meph
>
>--
>   "I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody."
>   -Dave '-ddt->' Taylor, announcing DOOM for Linux
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Ezra Nugroho
Web/Database Application Specialist
Goshen College ITS
Phone: (219) 535-7706


"Don't be humble, you're not that great." -- Golda Meir



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: resolv.conf

[Mariusz Pekala]

On Tue 13. November 2001 10:11, you (Rodolfo J. Paiz) wrote:
> At 11/13/2001 09:23 AM +0100, you wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:57:03AM -0500, Statux wrote:
> > > You aren't going to get an immediate response, especially since this
> > > list is based in the USA where it's the middle of the night right now.
> > > So keep your shirt on :)
> >
> >I beg to differ - the list server might be in the US, but "the list"
> > isn't, for a good part...
>
> I agree. I spend 50% of my time in Brazil and 30% in Guatemala; I'm only in
> the USA about 10% (10% others). The world has ceased to be easily divisible
> by simple geography.

Yeah!
I'm 100% in the Europe and 0% in USA :-))


-- 

Tego nie znajdziesz w żadnym sklepie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: konqueror&Netscape problem

[Mariusz Pekala]

On Tue 13. November 2001 07:42, you (nasim maleki) wrote:
[...]
> nameserver 62.3.23.3
> nameserver 192.9.9.3
>
> Could you please tell me what is wrong and why I can't
> open any page!

1) Can you ping something out there?
$ ping -c 2  62.3.23.3
$ ping -c 2  192.9.9.3
$ ping -c 2  64.58.76.98
...for example

2) Can you resolve host names?
$ host mail.yahoo.com

(I received such reply:
mail.yahoo.com. is an alias for login.yahoo.com.
login.yahoo.com. is an alias for login.yahoo.akadns.net.
login.yahoo.akadns.net. has address 64.58.76.99
login.yahoo.akadns.net. has address 64.58.76.98
 ...in case you're interested :) )

--Mariusz


-- 

Tego nie znajdziesz w żadnym sklepie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: poor performance on 7.2

[Justin Zygmont]

XFCE is an excellent alternative too, it takes several times less
power to run it.  www.xfce.org


On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Peter Peltonen wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:23:28PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > Curiously, when working on stuff at a text console, it seems fine for
> > the set of things I was doing. I wonder if it's just Gnome/Eazel that's
> > become pig slow. I'll have to try it with KDE or some simpler desktop
> > toolset.
>
> Try Blackbox instead of the bloated Gnome or KDE.
>
> I have a P166MMX/128M with RH71 installed in it and it runs smoothly with
> Blackbox. I've also installed Ximian Gnome but with it everything seems so
> much slower...
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Remote X sessions in Windows

[Ronald W. Heiby]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1




Enjoy!

Ron.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
Comment: The last PGP with full source disclosure.

iQA/AwUBO/FNVm8pw+2/9pUJEQJuEwCffGGWYT39aTEfYTXA91uJXPiYA2QAoOnm
BT9cPBdPLsQfAcObiCcQ43m/
=zr/U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Ambient MD5628D Modem - Install with Red Hat 7.2

[Alexander Shaw]

Hi,
 
Having had no joy 
trying to set up my Lucent modem with Red Hat 7.2 I've got loan of an Ambient 
MD5628 based modem which is supported by a driver for Kernel 2.2.x, has anyone 
had any success in getting this chip to work with Kernel 2.4.x or am I going to 
have to download an earlier version of Red Hat?
 
Any success or 
failure stories gratefully received :-)
 
Alex

Using an external monitor with a Dell C800

[pierre.frenkiel]

I have the following problem when connecting an external monitor
to a Dell C800 (either with a cable or into dock):

The video goes well to the monitor as long as Linus is in console mode,
but disappears when X starts.
The X config is OK, because using  to switch back to the external
monitor works well, and the video is absolutely normal(but this can't
obviously be done when into dock...)

The XFree version is 4.0.3-5, with the ati or r128 drivers.

Any idea on how to solve this stupid problem ?

-- 
Pierre Frenkiel e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Physique Corpusculaire et Cosmologie tel: 01.44.27.15.27
Collège de France   home: 01.60.86.58.25  mobile: 06.68.14.73.64
11 pl. Marcelin Berthelot / F-75231 Paris Cedex 5fax: 01.43.54.69.89



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

ide bus speed not optimal?

[christopher j bottaro]

i noticed these lines in dmesg...

ide: Assuming 33MHz PCI bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
hda: 78165360 sectors (40021 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=4865/255/63, UDMA(33)

but my hard drives are UDMA 100, how do i get them to run at optimal speed?

thanks,
christopher



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: use of rpm

[Ryan McAdams]

Yes, you can.  The question is, what are you trying to accomplish by
doing this, and will that happen?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: use of rpm

Hello,

Can I run rpm --rebuild *src.rpm > /tmp/rpm.log ( output the
installation steps become a data file ) ?
Thank for your help !

Edward.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Remote X sessions in Windows

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>>
>> The Cygwin XFree86 port is great! It beats buying a commercial Xserver.
[snip]
>
>Could you please reply with some pointers to that documentation online?
[snip]

Search for "Cygwin XFree86" at Google.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
Chat:  AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05
Linux. The choice of a GNU Generation. 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x6C94329D

iD8DBQE78TmnpCpg3WyUI50RAubYAJ9OLI1EYEW+lIhK47rGBGso7IDNBgCePBNi
C9I3U2sCP6dWGmUz7kKsROg=
=tsQj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: poor performance on 7.2

[Meph Istopheles]

  Fred,

> > >> On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 10:52, Meph Istopheles wrote:
> > >>   I had it running on an AMD k6-2 with 256MB RAM, & it was slower on a
> > >> similar box with 7.1 & 128MB RAM.  I also have 7.2 on my P-III 500 with
> > >> 256MB RAM, & it's fine -- no worse than when I was running 6.2 or 7.1 on
> > >> this box.  Odd.

> > > Are you thinking that it's a AMD thing?

> >   I suspect as much, but it may be the mb.  Don't remember off-hand, but
> > I think the same one is in each (both came from the same place, & I
> > think the only differece is the hard drive size).  I'm planning on
> > redoing the one with 128MB with 7.2 eventually, so, we'll see.

> One of the systems I complained about in my original post is a K6-2/350.

  I vaguely remember that;-).

> I'll have to check and see which kernel the 7.2 installer puts on there.

  Well, while the AMD box I'd installed the 7.2 on is now only running
W2K, the other is running RH 7.1.  I thought this might be a good point,
but I just checked, & the only kernel installed is i386.  I can't say
when I'll get to it, but I'll try a generic kernel before I give up on
any 7.x on it.  The box is for my girl friend's daughter, who's moving
in with us next summer (got it for other reasons, as well), & I really
don't want her running all those trojans-waiting to happen in Windows. 
Hope I can make it work with Linux.

   Maybe RH 6.2 & a generic kernel

> > >>> It IS faster, though, now that I have upgraded the kernel to 2.4.9-12,
> > >>> and force the controler into ata66 mode!

> I'd like to find a RH-patched 2.4.14 or .15, so we can get the new VM.

  My real problem with RH's kernels is only that their bloated.  You
might considere, as you'll be compiling a new one anyway, going
generic.  You'll find that customization is that much more controllable.

  Meph

--
  "I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody."
  -Dave '-ddt->' Taylor, announcing DOOM for Linux



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: resolv.conf

[Binyon Steve Contr Det 4 AFC2TIG/ASRCC]

Nasim
I assume these two IP's are the addresses of valid DNS nameservers, I would
then
ping the the two addresses and see if you get a response.  If you do, see if
namesevices is turned on.  
The DNS*.HOWTO and Networking-Overview-HOWTO would be good references.  Hope
this helps.
smb

-Original Message-
From: nasim maleki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: resolv.conf


Hi everyone
I have a beginners'-oriented-problem if you all don't
mind to help me!
I have both netscape and konqueror browser .. I dial
up and its ok and 
modem works BUT none of the browsers can open any web
page or link or 
what so ever..I get this message:
"Netscape is unable to locate the server
mail.yahoo.com.Please check the server 
name and try again."

I checked  resolv.conf in /etc and it looks like this:
#Begin info
#modified_by:pppd
#backup:/etc/resolv.conf  saved by pppd.ppp0
#process_id:1535
#script: /etc/ppp/ip-up
#save to:
#info:
 This is a temporary resolve.conf created by  
pppd.The previous file has been saved as  it will be restored when
 pppd disconects.If you do not like pppd to   
change your name server settings then set 
   modify_resolv_conf_Dynamically=no in   
 etc/rc.config.

### End info

nameserver 62.3.23.3
nameserver 192.9.9.3

Could you please tell me what is wrong and why I can't
open any page!
Thanks thanks thanks

Nasim


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: resolv.conf

[Statux]

Check permissions on resolv.conf

# chmod 644 /etc/resolv.conf


On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, nasim maleki wrote:

> 
> --- Statux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> > since this list is based in the USA where it's the
> > middle of the night 
> > right now. So keep your shirt on :)
> But I found you awake over there!
> You know I was just trying to mention and include the
> proper subjects to describe what was mentioned in my
> email and I couldn't decide between those 3 to best
> describe so I i menntioned them all!!
> Anyway thats kind of you to help me in midnight!
> Ok I did what you mentioned and I have no problem when
> i login by "root" I can access web pages and every
> thing is fine but when I log in by "nasmal" which is
> my id again the problem persists and I don't know why
> it is so?
> 1-Could you tell me please what is wrong?
> 2-Then also could you please tell me what does exactly
> that line do?Why for you it is :
>  
> > search dns.host.com dns2.host.com
> 
> And mine looks like this 
> > search ns.sun.com
> 
> 3-If I use a different ISP some other time should I
> again mention this line or will it change
>  
> Thank you for replying me soon
> > -Statux
> Thnks alot f
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, nasim maleki wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi everyone
> > > I have a beginners'-oriented-problem if you all
> > don't
> > > mind to help me!
> > > I have both netscape and konqueror browser .. I
> > dial
> > > up and its ok and 
> > > modem works BUT none of the browsers can open any
> > web
> > > page or link or 
> > > what so ever..I get this message:
> > > "Netscape is unable to locate the server
> > > mail.yahoo.com.Please check the server 
> > > name and try again."
> > > 
> > > I checked  resolv.conf in /etc and it looks like
> > this:
> > > #Begin info
> > > #modified_by:pppd
> > > #backup:/etc/resolv.conf  saved by pppd.ppp0
> > > #process_id:1535
> > > #script: /etc/ppp/ip-up
> > > #save to:
> > > #info:
> > >  This is a temporary resolve.conf created
> > by  
> > > pppd.The previous file has been saved as
> >  > > backup field above> it will be restored
> > when
> > >  pppd disconects.If you do not like pppd
> > to   
> > > change your name server settings then set 
> >
> > >modify_resolv_conf_Dynamically=no in   
> >
> > >  etc/rc.config.
> > > 
> > > ### End info
> > > 
> > > nameserver 62.3.23.3
> > > nameserver 192.9.9.3
> > > 
> > > Could you please tell me what is wrong and why I
> > can't
> > > open any page!
> > > Thanks thanks thanks
> > > 
> > > Nasim
> > > 
> > > 
> > > __
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> > > http://personals.yahoo.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -Statux
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> http://personals.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-- 
-Statux



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: resolv.conf

[nasim maleki]

--- Statux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
> since this list is based in the USA where it's the
> middle of the night 
> right now. So keep your shirt on :)
But I found you awake over there!
You know I was just trying to mention and include the
proper subjects to describe what was mentioned in my
email and I couldn't decide between those 3 to best
describe so I i menntioned them all!!
Anyway thats kind of you to help me in midnight!
Ok I did what you mentioned and I have no problem when
i login by "root" I can access web pages and every
thing is fine but when I log in by "nasmal" which is
my id again the problem persists and I don't know why
it is so?
1-Could you tell me please what is wrong?
2-Then also could you please tell me what does exactly
that line do?Why for you it is :
 
> search dns.host.com dns2.host.com

And mine looks like this 
> search ns.sun.com

3-If I use a different ISP some other time should I
again mention this line or will it change
 
Thank you for replying me soon
> -Statux
Thnks alot f
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, nasim maleki wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone
> > I have a beginners'-oriented-problem if you all
> don't
> > mind to help me!
> > I have both netscape and konqueror browser .. I
> dial
> > up and its ok and 
> > modem works BUT none of the browsers can open any
> web
> > page or link or 
> > what so ever..I get this message:
> > "Netscape is unable to locate the server
> > mail.yahoo.com.Please check the server 
> > name and try again."
> > 
> > I checked  resolv.conf in /etc and it looks like
> this:
> > #Begin info
> > #modified_by:pppd
> > #backup:/etc/resolv.conf  saved by pppd.ppp0
> > #process_id:1535
> > #script: /etc/ppp/ip-up
> > #save to:
> > #info:
> >  This is a temporary resolve.conf created
> by  
> > pppd.The previous file has been saved as
>  > backup field above> it will be restored
> when
> >  pppd disconects.If you do not like pppd
> to   
> > change your name server settings then set 
>
> >modify_resolv_conf_Dynamically=no in   
>
> >  etc/rc.config.
> > 
> > ### End info
> > 
> > nameserver 62.3.23.3
> > nameserver 192.9.9.3
> > 
> > Could you please tell me what is wrong and why I
> can't
> > open any page!
> > Thanks thanks thanks
> > 
> > Nasim
> > 
> > 
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> > http://personals.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> 
> -- 
> -Statux
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Remote X sessions in Windows

[Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz)]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Anthony E. Greene wrote:

>
> The Cygwin XFree86 port is great! It beats buying a commercial Xserver.
> It's also great to get bash and basic GNU utilites on Windows. IIRC, you
> also get an ssh client. I set my Linux server to accept XDMCP connections
> and created a script on the Windows box that established the connection
> using the options described in the Cygwin XFree86 docs. Then a shortcut on
> my Windesktop made it easy to establish a GUI login to the Linux server
> whenever I need one.
>
> Tony



Tony,



Could you please reply with some pointers to that documentation online?
I've been wanting to try XFree86 on Windows for a while now.  I do run
Cygwin on my wife's Windows computer to write shell scripts for backups,
etc. (Windows _really_ sucks at this), but didn't find the time to play
with XFree86 yet.



-- 
--
Nitebirdz
--
http://www.linuxnovice.org
News, tips, articles, links...

*** XFS for Linux: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs ***
*** http://www.mozilla.org ***



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: MKKICKSTART replacement???

[Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz)]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Gordon Stewart wrote:

> Dear List
>
> Can anyone tell me where I can find mkkickstart rpm for my RH7 serverbox.
> mkkickstart is a useful tool, bring it back!!!  I do not run X windows!!
>
> cheers
>
> Gordon
>

The rpmfind.net database seems to have mkkickstart for Red Hat 7.1:

http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=mkkickstart&submit=Search+...




-- 
--
Nitebirdz
--
http://www.linuxnovice.org
News, tips, articles, links...

*** XFS for Linux: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs ***
*** http://www.mozilla.org ***



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Simple VPN setup

[Ed Wilts]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:17:55AM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> i'm looking for the same thing...kinda.
> 
> i have a lan (consisting of 2 redhat 7.2 machines) behind a cable modem 
> router/firewall.  i want remote linux and windows machines to be able to 
> access my lan over the internet (for mounting shared partitions via NFS and 
> samba).  i'm not a system/network admin (i'm just a lowly computer 
> scientist), 

This is actually not complex, but it's not very bright either.  Many ISPs
will block Samba over a wide area because of the security implications.
NFS usually isn't blocked, but it sure should be.  In the security circles
NFS stands for No F*cking Security.  NFS can be trivially broken - the
server is designed to trust the client - basically it believes whatever it's
told and this opens you open to easy penetration.

.../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

lilo -R equiv for grub

[Gary Stainburn]

Hi all,

As part of my upgrade to rh72 I installed grub, and thanks to it's map 
feature I can now load Win95 again in what is now my Primary Slave drive (was 
Primary Master).

However, I miss the ability of Lilo to 'one-time-only' change the default 
boot option from Linux to Windows. Especially when you can call it from KDM.

Does grub have a similar feature, and can KDM support it?

-- 
Gary Stainburn
 
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: linux box as router : performance ?

[Burke, Thomas G.]

Not sure if i't what you're asking for, but...

RH 3.2 on a pentium 75: 10Mb coax w/ 3Com etherlink III combo cards...
As a workstation - ~7Mbps transfers through a linux router (exact
same specs as the workstation - used as a dynamic router, but no DNS - this
was supported by a SUN server) - this had 10Mb ether on each side...

RH 6.2 on a PII-450:  Same ethernet cards as above, two different
configurations for the internal network - used to be on thin ether (50 ohm
coax), recently migrated to CAT-5...  Transfer rates between M$ Win98 & the
server ~8-9Mbps.  Through the server - running apache, samba, masq'ing
connections, ipchains firewall, sshd, sendmail, & some other stuff - maxed
out the throughput of the cable modem (~1.5Mbps down & 256kbps up)...  Load
meters during biggest loads (starting a game on the server & piping it's
output through X windows - while doing a large download via ftp/http) showed
my disk doing some peaky stuff, but the processor kept a load average below
10%...  When the game quit loading, I could hardly tell a difference between
a transfer going through or not...

> -Original Message-
> From: Thierry ITTY [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:05 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  linux box as router : performance ?
> 
> Hi
> 
> just interested in performance data that anyone could have collected when
> trying to run a linux box with one or several NICs as a router (simple
> router with static routes, complex with OSPF or BGP, dynamic, policy,
> filters...), some kind of table(s) showing overall performance (packets/s,
> bytes/s...) and configuration (cpu, memory, nics...)
> 
> tia
>   - * - * - * - * - * - * -
> Si nous avons chacun un objet et que nous les echangeons, 
>nous avons encore chacun un objet.
> Si nous avons chacun une idee et que nous les echangeons,
>nous avons alors chacun deux idees.
> 
> Thierry ITTY
> eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] FRANCE
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Chromium

[Burke, Thomas G.]

And don't forget the variants of "squash" and "handball"  :)

> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Hughes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:38 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Re: Chromium
> 
> Ed Wilts wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 13:40, Eric Wood wrote:
> > > Me too. Wow is that slow!  Looks like I get 1 frame per second.  Maybe
> it
> > > requires a 3D accelerator card.
> >
> > Nice and fast on my system with a Matrox G450 card.  Too bad I suck at
> > this game.  My reflexes ain't what they were back in my Pong days... :-)
> 
> Showing your age, Ed.  I remember when Pong was the coolest thing since
> sliced
> bread.
> 
> Bret
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

ppp backup link

[Matthew Simpson]

Hi All.

We have an DSL link and occasionally the link dies for a few hours. 
We want to beable to hook up a modem as the backup link. Does anyone 
have a script that will bring up ppp1 if ppp0 goes down?

Thanks in Advance

Matt



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: resolv.conf

[Rodolfo J. Paiz]

At 11/13/2001 09:23 AM +0100, you wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:57:03AM -0500, Statux wrote:
> > You aren't going to get an immediate response, especially since this list
> > is based in the USA where it's the middle of the night right now. So keep
> > your shirt on :)
>
>I beg to differ - the list server might be in the US, but "the list" isn't,
>for a good part...

I agree. I spend 50% of my time in Brazil and 30% in Guatemala; I'm only in 
the USA about 10% (10% others). The world has ceased to be easily divisible 
by simple geography.


--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: MKKICKSTART replacement???

[Gordon Stewart]

Dear List

Can anyone tell me where I can find mkkickstart rpm for my RH7 serverbox.
mkkickstart is a useful tool, bring it back!!!  I do not run X windows!!

cheers

Gordon

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Graham Hemmings
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MKKICKSTART replacement???
>
>
> Why remove such a useful tool - Doh!  I really don't want X or
> any of it's
> libraries near this particular machine.
>
> What are the repercussions of running mkkickstart --force
>
>
> Graham.
>
>
> At 11:56 12/11/2001, you wrote:
> >On 12 Nov 2001, Edward C. Bailey wrote:
> >
> > > > "Graham" == Graham Hemmings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Graham> Upon running mkkickstart under RH7.2 it informs me
> that it is no
> > > Graham> longer used under RH7.2 and that I should use ksconfig.
> > >
> > > Graham> Does anyone know where I can actually find ksconfig
> as it's not
> > > Graham> installed on my system?
> > >
> > > $ rpm -qf /usr/sbin/ksconfig
> > > ksconfig-1.9.8-4
> > > $
> >
> >but mkkickstart and ksconfig are philosophically two different tools.
> >mkkickstart (IIRC) would create a ks file to *duplicate* the machine
> >you ran it on.  ksconfig is used to create a ks.cfg file according
> >to your detailed specs.  so, technically, it's not a replacement.
> >
> >rday
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: resolv.conf

[Thomas Ribbrock]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:57:03AM -0500, Statux wrote:
> You aren't going to get an immediate response, especially since this list
> is based in the USA where it's the middle of the night right now. So keep
> your shirt on :)

I beg to differ - the list server might be in the US, but "the list" isn't,
for a good part...

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
   NEWSFLASH: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
  http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html
 Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.ribbrock.org | ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

linux box as router : performance ?

[Thierry ITTY]

Hi

just interested in performance data that anyone could have collected when
trying to run a linux box with one or several NICs as a router (simple
router with static routes, complex with OSPF or BGP, dynamic, policy,
filters...), some kind of table(s) showing overall performance (packets/s,
bytes/s...) and configuration (cpu, memory, nics...)

tia
- * - * - * - * - * - * -
Si nous avons chacun un objet et que nous les echangeons, 
   nous avons encore chacun un objet.
Si nous avons chacun une idee et que nous les echangeons,
   nous avons alors chacun deux idees.

Thierry ITTY
eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   FRANCE



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list