Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Jesse Angell

My main problem is I host palace chat servers, so I obviously need to be
able to use the palace chat client. There is no linux version, and the
people who created it no longer exist. I've tried downloading wine before
and running it, and.. about half of it works. backgrounds won't download
stuff like that, and that's simply not adequte. I am curious if anyone would
do me a large favor, if I were to provide them with the palace client try it
under the Crossover wine, or whatever it is, and see if it functions
correctly.. To obtain it.. please contact me
aim:   korruptdotcom
icq: 56295559


-
Thank You,
Jesse Angell
Founder, PalaceUnlimited.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows


 
  Are there particular applications or peripherals you use, or would
like
  to use, that work under Windows or Mac OS, but still there are no
solutions
  for under Linux?

 With Crossover Office, which provides a Win32 emulation layer, the
 application barrier has been pretty much obliterated.  As for
 peripherals, the only problem I've ever seen is with WinModems.

 As a Linux user, I often feel strangled when I have to work on a Windows
 platform, because everything that you might want to do you have to pay
 extra money for.  Print to PDF?  Mo money.  Use office applications?  More
 money.  Do diagramming?  More money.  Do computer graphics?  More money.
 Do basic database work?  More money.  Move my basic database onto a more
 advanced platform?  More money.  Do accounting?  more money.  Build
 applications? More money.

 Sometimes I can find such software for Windows, but the hassle of having
 to locate and install it, and the fact that it only works half as well as
 with Linux makes it a tough choice.

 With Linux, I just find the distribution that matches my needs, and for
 about $100 I have all the applications I ever wanted, preinstalled, and
 supported.  Some people don't understand the Linux desktop, but I don't
 understand how anyone manages to get anything done in Windows.  It's like
 the whole thing is set up to make as many roadblocks to getting work done
 as possible.

 For example, on Windows, every application tries to have it's own splash
 screen, even if it's a small utility.  This is a pain because I just want
 it to open and run.  As I said, it's like they are putting up roadblocks.
 And when I want something automated, I can do that easily, too.

 There might be a good application or two on Windows that's not on Linux,
 but you can test it with CrossOver if you really want to use it.  I
 haven't had any that I was dying for, though.

 Hope that helps you on your quest.  Was there anything specific YOU needed
 to know for your switch?

 Sincerely,
 Jonathan Bartlett

 
  Thanks,
 
  Doug Lerner, Tokyo
 
 
 
  ___
  Redhat-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Doug Lerner

Interesting note. Thanks, Jonathan. Actually, no, there is nothing in
particular I am looking for at the moment. But I am just getting started.

I like using Entourage (I admit it!) in OS X, so I hope I can find a really
nice, complete, multi-account, multi-user email solution in Linux. And guess
what - I don't even mind paying for software I like! :-)

And I will be looking for an Office solution, and a Web authoring solution
too.

doug

On 7/28/02 1:28 PM, Jonathan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Are there particular applications or peripherals you use, or would like
 to use, that work under Windows or Mac OS, but still there are no solutions
 for under Linux?
 
 With Crossover Office, which provides a Win32 emulation layer, the
 application barrier has been pretty much obliterated.  As for
 peripherals, the only problem I've ever seen is with WinModems.
 
 As a Linux user, I often feel strangled when I have to work on a Windows
 platform, because everything that you might want to do you have to pay
 extra money for.  Print to PDF?  Mo money.  Use office applications?  More
 money.  Do diagramming?  More money.  Do computer graphics?  More money.
 Do basic database work?  More money.  Move my basic database onto a more
 advanced platform?  More money.  Do accounting?  more money.  Build
 applications? More money.
 
 Sometimes I can find such software for Windows, but the hassle of having
 to locate and install it, and the fact that it only works half as well as
 with Linux makes it a tough choice.
 
 With Linux, I just find the distribution that matches my needs, and for
 about $100 I have all the applications I ever wanted, preinstalled, and
 supported.  Some people don't understand the Linux desktop, but I don't
 understand how anyone manages to get anything done in Windows.  It's like
 the whole thing is set up to make as many roadblocks to getting work done
 as possible.
 
 For example, on Windows, every application tries to have it's own splash
 screen, even if it's a small utility.  This is a pain because I just want
 it to open and run.  As I said, it's like they are putting up roadblocks.
 And when I want something automated, I can do that easily, too.
 
 There might be a good application or two on Windows that's not on Linux,
 but you can test it with CrossOver if you really want to use it.  I
 haven't had any that I was dying for, though.
 
 Hope that helps you on your quest.  Was there anything specific YOU needed
 to know for your switch?
 
 Sincerely,
 Jonathan Bartlett
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Doug Lerner, Tokyo
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Doug Lerner

I must be in another world, but I have never heard of a Brother MFC 9200c,
Linksys or SpeedStream. :-)

doug

On 7/28/02 2:28 PM, Todd A. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Doug Lerner wrote:
 
 Are there particular applications or peripherals you use, or would
 like to use, that work under Windows or Mac OS, but still there are no
 solutions for under Linux?
 
 A lot of all-in-one devices like the Brother MFC 9200c aren't supported at
 all under Linux. Getting IrDA to work on my Sony Vaio Z505-JS under Linux
 has been a large exercise in futility. --Oh, and anything Linksys will
 pretty much be hit-and-miss. They hate Linux users...but at least they're
 up-front about it, unlike SpeedStream, who won't support their own Wi-Fi
 cards or drivers under either Linux *or* Windows, if you can believe that.
 
 --
 The only thing that helps me maintain my slender grip on reality is the
 friendship I share with my collection of singing potatoes.
 
 - Holly, JMC Vessel *Red Dwarf*
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Doug Lerner

Ah! The Palace! I used to run one of those!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 7/28/02 3:32 PM, Jesse Angell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My main problem is I host palace chat servers, so I obviously need to be
 able to use the palace chat client. There is no linux version, and the
 people who created it no longer exist. I've tried downloading wine before
 and running it, and.. about half of it works. backgrounds won't download
 stuff like that, and that's simply not adequte. I am curious if anyone would
 do me a large favor, if I were to provide them with the palace client try it
 under the Crossover wine, or whatever it is, and see if it functions
 correctly.. To obtain it.. please contact me
 aim:   korruptdotcom
 icq: 56295559
 
 
 -
 Thank You,
 Jesse Angell
 Founder, PalaceUnlimited.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jonathan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 11:28 PM
 Subject: Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows
 
 
 
 Are there particular applications or peripherals you use, or would
 like
 to use, that work under Windows or Mac OS, but still there are no
 solutions
 for under Linux?
 
 With Crossover Office, which provides a Win32 emulation layer, the
 application barrier has been pretty much obliterated.  As for
 peripherals, the only problem I've ever seen is with WinModems.
 
 As a Linux user, I often feel strangled when I have to work on a Windows
 platform, because everything that you might want to do you have to pay
 extra money for.  Print to PDF?  Mo money.  Use office applications?  More
 money.  Do diagramming?  More money.  Do computer graphics?  More money.
 Do basic database work?  More money.  Move my basic database onto a more
 advanced platform?  More money.  Do accounting?  more money.  Build
 applications? More money.
 
 Sometimes I can find such software for Windows, but the hassle of having
 to locate and install it, and the fact that it only works half as well as
 with Linux makes it a tough choice.
 
 With Linux, I just find the distribution that matches my needs, and for
 about $100 I have all the applications I ever wanted, preinstalled, and
 supported.  Some people don't understand the Linux desktop, but I don't
 understand how anyone manages to get anything done in Windows.  It's like
 the whole thing is set up to make as many roadblocks to getting work done
 as possible.
 
 For example, on Windows, every application tries to have it's own splash
 screen, even if it's a small utility.  This is a pain because I just want
 it to open and run.  As I said, it's like they are putting up roadblocks.
 And when I want something automated, I can do that easily, too.
 
 There might be a good application or two on Windows that's not on Linux,
 but you can test it with CrossOver if you really want to use it.  I
 haven't had any that I was dying for, though.
 
 Hope that helps you on your quest.  Was there anything specific YOU needed
 to know for your switch?
 
 Sincerely,
 Jonathan Bartlett
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Doug Lerner, Tokyo
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Michael Scottaline

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:02:10 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled intuitively:

Interesting note. Thanks, Jonathan. Actually, no, there is nothing in
particular I am looking for at the moment. But I am just getting started.

I like using Entourage (I admit it!) in OS X, so I hope I can find a
really nice, complete, multi-account, multi-user email solution in Linux.
And guess what - I don't even mind paying for software I like! :-)

If you mean something quite large, w/calendering, etc., you can give
evolution 1.0.8 a look.  Takes a little while to load up, but I believe
ithandles all of the things Entourage does.  [I personally prefer
separateapps, so I don't use evolution.  I use Sylpheed for my e-mail and
gnomecalender for keeping my calender.]



And I will be looking for an Office solution, and a Web authoring
solution too.

For an Office suite give OpenOffice.org a try.  Handles M$ Office Suite
files quite well.  For a few bucks you can get a hold of its slightly
more full featured cousin, StarOffice.
HTH,
Mike

-- 
BluePoint Brewery, LI
--Run a river through your liver!!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Doug Lerner

On 7/28/02 10:12 PM, Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 If you mean something quite large, w/calendering, etc., you can give
 evolution 1.0.8 a look.  Takes a little while to load up, but I believe
 ithandles all of the things Entourage does.  [I personally prefer
 separateapps, so I don't use evolution.  I use Sylpheed for my e-mail and
 gnomecalender for keeping my calender.]
 

Actually, I don't really care about the Calendar and other features in
Entourage other than email.

But Entourage does email really well. It can display HTML email and compose
in HTML email or turn it off, as you prefer.

If you have multiple aliases in one mailbox (account), when you reply it
automatically replies from the address to which email was received. This is
an important point for me, because I have several aliases and you would be
surprised at the number of email clients that overlook this feature.

It works well in Japanese too, which is also important to me.

And I like the way it keeps track of reply histories, finding originals to
replies, etc.

doug



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Michael Scottaline

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:19:36 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled intuitively:

On 7/28/02 10:12 PM, Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 If you mean something quite large, w/calendering, etc., you can give
 evolution 1.0.8 a look.  Takes a little while to load up, but I believe
 ithandles all of the things Entourage does.  [I personally prefer
 separateapps, so I don't use evolution.  I use Sylpheed for my e-mail
and gnomecalender for keeping my calender.]
 

Actually, I don't really care about the Calendar and other features in
Entourage other than email.

But Entourage does email really well. It can display HTML email and
compose in HTML email or turn it off, as you prefer.
===
Sylpheed will NOT compose in html, but can handle viewing somewhat.  It
is small and *extremely* fast.
==


If you have multiple aliases in one mailbox (account), when you reply it
automatically replies from the address to which email was received. This
is an important point for me, because I have several aliases and you
would be surprised at the number of email clients that overlook this
feature.
==
Sylpheed handles the reply function in exactly this manner :)
=

It works well in Japanese too, which is also important to me.

The author of Sylpheed is Japanese :o)

go to sylpheed.good-day.net and give it a try.  You might like it!!

Mike
-- 
BluePoint Brewery, LI
--Run a river through your liver!!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Kevin MacNeil

On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 10:02:10PM +0900, Doug Lerner wrote:
 I like using Entourage (I admit it!) in OS X, so I hope I can find a
 really nice, complete, multi-account, multi-user email solution in
 Linux. And guess what - I don't even mind paying for software I like!
 :-)

But you probably won't have to, which is even better.  Ximian Evolution
is an amazingly polished and powerful email client that will do anything
a commercial version will do -- except get infected by viruses.  

 And I will be looking for an Office solution, and a Web authoring
 solution too.

Openoffice probably does nearly everything you would need (including
reading MS Office file formats), though it is not quite as polished as
MS Office.  But it is free and getting better as we speak.  Write. 

I'm not so knowledgeable about web-authoring solutions, but Mozilla
Composer does everything I'd need in a web authoring tool.  Actually,
Mozilla in general is an impressive piece of work.  It's dead stable and
I'm so used to tabbed browsing that I feel hindered using anything else.

In short, linux has made enormous strides in the last couple of years,
both in terms of GUIs and applications.  Back in the redhat 5.x days it
took a certain amount of dedication to use linux as your everyday
desktop OS.  No more.  I have a secure and stable machine with every
application I would ever need, I can read proprietary file formats if I
have to, my rh7.2/ximian desktop is right purty and never crashes, and
live is good :-).



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-28 Thread Alan Harding

On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 14:19, Doug Lerner wrote:
 On 7/28/02 10:12 PM, Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  If you mean something quite large, w/calendering, etc., you can give
  evolution 1.0.8 a look.  Takes a little while to load up, but I believe
  ithandles all of the things Entourage does.  [I personally prefer
  separateapps, so I don't use evolution.  I use Sylpheed for my e-mail and
  gnomecalender for keeping my calender.]
  
 
 Actually, I don't really care about the Calendar and other features in
 Entourage other than email.
 
 But Entourage does email really well. It can display HTML email and compose
 in HTML email or turn it off, as you prefer.
 
 If you have multiple aliases in one mailbox (account), when you reply it
 automatically replies from the address to which email was received. This is
 an important point for me, because I have several aliases and you would be
 surprised at the number of email clients that overlook this feature.
 
 It works well in Japanese too, which is also important to me.
 
 And I like the way it keeps track of reply histories, finding originals to
 replies, etc.
 
 doug
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 

I have to say that apart from the Japanese bit, which I cant comment on,
what you have just described is Evolution. I find it stable, and easy to
use, with the ability to handle multiple Mailboxes. 

As for the Office apps, then you would have to go a long way to beat the
Crossover from Codeweavers. I use it for Word, and Excel, and even the
most complicated accounting spreadsheets we have open perfectly every
time.



-- 
Alan  Jan Harding
Tel: 07715 539272
One by one the penguins are stealing my sanity



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-27 Thread Jonathan Bartlett


 Are there particular applications or peripherals you use, or would like
 to use, that work under Windows or Mac OS, but still there are no solutions
 for under Linux?

With Crossover Office, which provides a Win32 emulation layer, the
application barrier has been pretty much obliterated.  As for
peripherals, the only problem I've ever seen is with WinModems.

As a Linux user, I often feel strangled when I have to work on a Windows
platform, because everything that you might want to do you have to pay
extra money for.  Print to PDF?  Mo money.  Use office applications?  More
money.  Do diagramming?  More money.  Do computer graphics?  More money.
Do basic database work?  More money.  Move my basic database onto a more
advanced platform?  More money.  Do accounting?  more money.  Build
applications? More money.

Sometimes I can find such software for Windows, but the hassle of having
to locate and install it, and the fact that it only works half as well as
with Linux makes it a tough choice.

With Linux, I just find the distribution that matches my needs, and for
about $100 I have all the applications I ever wanted, preinstalled, and
supported.  Some people don't understand the Linux desktop, but I don't
understand how anyone manages to get anything done in Windows.  It's like
the whole thing is set up to make as many roadblocks to getting work done
as possible.

For example, on Windows, every application tries to have it's own splash
screen, even if it's a small utility.  This is a pain because I just want
it to open and run.  As I said, it's like they are putting up roadblocks.
And when I want something automated, I can do that easily, too.

There might be a good application or two on Windows that's not on Linux,
but you can test it with CrossOver if you really want to use it.  I
haven't had any that I was dying for, though.

Hope that helps you on your quest.  Was there anything specific YOU needed
to know for your switch?

Sincerely,
Jonathan Bartlett


 Thanks,

 Doug Lerner, Tokyo



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux vs Mac vs Windows

2002-07-27 Thread Todd A. Jacobs

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Doug Lerner wrote:

 Are there particular applications or peripherals you use, or would
 like to use, that work under Windows or Mac OS, but still there are no
 solutions for under Linux?

A lot of all-in-one devices like the Brother MFC 9200c aren't supported at
all under Linux. Getting IrDA to work on my Sony Vaio Z505-JS under Linux
has been a large exercise in futility. --Oh, and anything Linksys will
pretty much be hit-and-miss. They hate Linux users...but at least they're
up-front about it, unlike SpeedStream, who won't support their own Wi-Fi
cards or drivers under either Linux *or* Windows, if you can believe that.

-- 
The only thing that helps me maintain my slender grip on reality is the
friendship I share with my collection of singing potatoes.

- Holly, JMC Vessel *Red Dwarf*



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list