[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

We recently became aware of the build-problems on OSX.  The fixes are
included in the next release of
CVXOPT (0.9).

Joachim

On Oct 22, 4:16 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 10/22/07, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I had the following failure from make test,  from devel/sage-main/
  sage/numerical/test.py.  I'm guessing its from the convoluted history
  of my fortran installs on that machine (a powerpc apple powerbook):

 You're right.  We added some doctests in test.py to specifically
 test that all the convex optimization code really got built.
 Evidently it didn't for you.  If you aren't doing convex optimization
 (viacvxopt) this won't affect you.

 By the way, I am able to replicate exactly this problem on my powerpc
 mac test machine.  I've opened
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/969
 about this.



  sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
  **
  File test.py, line 4:
  : fromcvxopt.base import *
  Exception raised:
  Traceback (most recent call last):
File /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py,
  line 1212, in __run
  compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File doctest __main__.example_0[0], line 1, in module
  fromcvxopt.base import *###line 4:
  : fromcvxopt.base import *
  ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
  packages/cvxopt/base.so, 2): Symbol not found: __g95_ioparm
Referenced from: /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
  packages/cvxopt/base.so
Expected in: dynamic lookup

  **
  File test.py, line 5:
  : fromcvxoptimport umfpack
  Exception raised:
  Traceback (most recent call last):
File /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py,
  line 1212, in __run
  compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File doctest __main__.example_0[1], line 1, in module
  fromcvxoptimport umfpack###line 5:
  : fromcvxoptimport umfpack
  ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
  packages/cvxopt/umfpack.so, 2): Symbol not found: __g95_st_write_done
Referenced from: /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
  packages/cvxopt/umfpack.so
Expected in: dynamic lookup

  **
  1 items had failures:
 2 of   8 in __main__.example_0
  ***Test Failed*** 2 failures.

  On Oct 21, 3:03 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Successfully upgraded to 2.8.8.1 on linux (Kubuntu 7.04):

   sage --testall
   (...)

   All tests passed!
   Total time for all tests: 1978.6 seconds

   John Cremona

 --
 William Stein
 Associate Professor of Mathematics
 University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-22 Thread Hamptonio 

I had the following failure from make test,  from devel/sage-main/
sage/numerical/test.py.  I'm guessing its from the convoluted history
of my fortran installs on that machine (a powerpc apple powerbook):

sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
**
File test.py, line 4:
: from cvxopt.base import *
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py,
line 1212, in __run
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
  File doctest __main__.example_0[0], line 1, in module
from cvxopt.base import *###line 4:
: from cvxopt.base import *
ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
packages/cvxopt/base.so, 2): Symbol not found: __g95_ioparm
  Referenced from: /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
packages/cvxopt/base.so
  Expected in: dynamic lookup

**
File test.py, line 5:
: from cvxopt import umfpack
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py,
line 1212, in __run
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
  File doctest __main__.example_0[1], line 1, in module
from cvxopt import umfpack###line 5:
: from cvxopt import umfpack
ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
packages/cvxopt/umfpack.so, 2): Symbol not found: __g95_st_write_done
  Referenced from: /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
packages/cvxopt/umfpack.so
  Expected in: dynamic lookup

**
1 items had failures:
   2 of   8 in __main__.example_0
***Test Failed*** 2 failures.

On Oct 21, 3:03 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Successfully upgraded to 2.8.8.1 on linux (Kubuntu 7.04):

 sage --testall
 (...)

 All tests passed!
 Total time for all tests: 1978.6 seconds

 John Cremona


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-22 Thread William Stein 

On 10/22/07, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I had the following failure from make test,  from devel/sage-main/
 sage/numerical/test.py.  I'm guessing its from the convoluted history
 of my fortran installs on that machine (a powerpc apple powerbook):

You're right.  We added some doctests in test.py to specifically
test that all the convex optimization code really got built.
Evidently it didn't for you.  If you aren't doing convex optimization
(via cvxopt) this won't affect you.

By the way, I am able to replicate exactly this problem on my powerpc
mac test machine.  I've opened
   http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/969
about this.

 sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
 **
 File test.py, line 4:
 : from cvxopt.base import *
 Exception raised:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py,
 line 1212, in __run
 compileflags, 1) in test.globs
   File doctest __main__.example_0[0], line 1, in module
 from cvxopt.base import *###line 4:
 : from cvxopt.base import *
 ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
 packages/cvxopt/base.so, 2): Symbol not found: __g95_ioparm
   Referenced from: /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
 packages/cvxopt/base.so
   Expected in: dynamic lookup

 **
 File test.py, line 5:
 : from cvxopt import umfpack
 Exception raised:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py,
 line 1212, in __run
 compileflags, 1) in test.globs
   File doctest __main__.example_0[1], line 1, in module
 from cvxopt import umfpack###line 5:
 : from cvxopt import umfpack
 ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
 packages/cvxopt/umfpack.so, 2): Symbol not found: __g95_st_write_done
   Referenced from: /Users/mh/sage-2.8.4.1/local/lib/python/site-
 packages/cvxopt/umfpack.so
   Expected in: dynamic lookup

 **
 1 items had failures:
2 of   8 in __main__.example_0
 ***Test Failed*** 2 failures.

 On Oct 21, 3:03 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Successfully upgraded to 2.8.8.1 on linux (Kubuntu 7.04):
 
  sage --testall
  (...)
 
  All tests passed!
  Total time for all tests: 1978.6 seconds
 
  John Cremona


 



-- 
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-22 Thread David Joyner 

On 10/21/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think I know what's going on.

 If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
 workspace you get the behavior I see.  If you don't install
 the optional packages you don't.  Thus one of the packages
 changes the print behavior of Gap.

 Indeed, here it is:

 gap LoadPackage(hap);
 Loading HAP 1.7.5gamma ...
 true
 gap PolynomialRing(Rationals,2);
 PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])

 My solution will be to slightly change gap.py, so it does *not*
 autoload hap into the workspace,  then change the doctests
 back.Note: In the old gap.py, hap wasn't loaded into the
 workspace automatically -- I thought this was a mistake, but
 evidently the reason is because hap slightly modifies
 how certain things work with gap polynomial rings.  Annoying.

I believe this is *illegal* (ie, does not conform to GAP package requirements)
and have reported it. I'll let you know when I hear more. If needed, I'll create
a new gap_packages*.spkg.

Sorry about the hassle.


 OK, I've pushed this out, so hg_sage.pull() will get you the
 fixed version of gap.py.

 William

 On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  William Stein wrote:
   On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
  
   These are not typos.  The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
   of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change.  Evidently for
   some reason your gap didn't get upgraded.   Try
  
  sage: !gap
  
 
  This is on a fresh install (but dito with the upgrade):
 
  GAP4, Version: 4.4.10 of 02-Oct-2007, i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
  gap
 
   to see what version of gap you now have.
  
   Also, you may need to do
  sage: gap_reset_workspace()
 
  That does not help. Same test failures.
 
  Jaap
 
 
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$ ./sage -t  
   devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
   sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py 
   **
   File gap.py, line 69:
sage: R = gap.PolynomialRing('Rationals', 2); R
   Expected:
PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])
   Got:
PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ])
   **
   File gap.py, line 71:
sage: I = R.IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(); I
   Expected:
[ x, x_2 ]
   Got:
[ x_1, x_2 ]
   **
   File gap.py, line 86:
sage: f = gap(str(g)); f
   Expected:
-x^5+x_2^2
   Got:
-x_1^5+x_2^2
   **
   1 items had failures:
   3 of  22 in __main__.example_0
   ***Test Failed*** 3 failures.
   For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_gap.py
 [2.4 s]
   exit code: 256
  
   --
   The following tests failed:
  
  
sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
   Total time for all tests: 2.4 seconds
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 


 --
 William Stein
 Associate Professor of Mathematics
 University of Washington
 http://wstein.org

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread Jaap Spies 

William Stein wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I've released sage-2.8.8.  Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
 or just do sage -upgrade.
 

There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py

Jaap

[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$ ./sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py 
**
File gap.py, line 69:
 sage: R = gap.PolynomialRing('Rationals', 2); R
Expected:
 PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])
Got:
 PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ])
**
File gap.py, line 71:
 sage: I = R.IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(); I
Expected:
 [ x, x_2 ]
Got:
 [ x_1, x_2 ]
**
File gap.py, line 86:
 sage: f = gap(str(g)); f
Expected:
 -x^5+x_2^2
Got:
 -x_1^5+x_2^2
**
1 items had failures:
3 of  22 in __main__.example_0
***Test Failed*** 3 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_gap.py
  [2.4 s]
exit code: 256

--
The following tests failed:


 sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
Total time for all tests: 2.4 seconds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread William Stein 

On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 William Stein wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I've released sage-2.8.8.  Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
  or just do sage -upgrade.
 

 There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py

These are not typos.  The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change.  Evidently for
some reason your gap didn't get upgraded.   Try

   sage: !gap

to see what version of gap you now have.

Also, you may need to do
   sage: gap_reset_workspace()



 Jaap

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$ ./sage -t  
 devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
 sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py 
 **
 File gap.py, line 69:
  sage: R = gap.PolynomialRing('Rationals', 2); R
 Expected:
  PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])
 Got:
  PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ])
 **
 File gap.py, line 71:
  sage: I = R.IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(); I
 Expected:
  [ x, x_2 ]
 Got:
  [ x_1, x_2 ]
 **
 File gap.py, line 86:
  sage: f = gap(str(g)); f
 Expected:
  -x^5+x_2^2
 Got:
  -x_1^5+x_2^2
 **
 1 items had failures:
 3 of  22 in __main__.example_0
 ***Test Failed*** 3 failures.
 For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_gap.py
   [2.4 s]
 exit code: 256

 --
 The following tests failed:


  sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
 Total time for all tests: 2.4 seconds
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$


 



-- 
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread cwitty 

On Oct 21, 9:34 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py

 These are not typos.  The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
 of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change.  Evidently for
 some reason your gap didn't get upgraded.   Try

sage: !gap

 to see what version of gap you now have.

Actually, I'm seeing the same problems as Jaap.

Here are some logs from a sage -gap session.

First, from an old install I haven't touched for a couple of weeks:
GAP4, Version: 4.4.9 of 6-Nov-2006, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
gap PolynomialRing(Rationals, 2);
PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ])

Next, from a clean 2.8.8 install:
GAP4, Version: 4.4.10 of 02-Oct-2007, i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
gap PolynomialRing(Rationals, 2);
PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ])

As far as I can tell, the behavior of GAP hasn't changed here.  (I
think we had a miscommunication last night... I was trying to report
that the gap.py doctest was failing with the latest code, after you
changed the doctest; but I didn't say that clearly.)

Carl


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread Jaap Spies 

William Stein wrote:
 On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
 
 These are not typos.  The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
 of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change.  Evidently for
 some reason your gap didn't get upgraded.   Try
 
sage: !gap
 

This is on a fresh install (but dito with the upgrade):

GAP4, Version: 4.4.10 of 02-Oct-2007, i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
gap

 to see what version of gap you now have.
 
 Also, you may need to do
sage: gap_reset_workspace()

That does not help. Same test failures.

Jaap



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$ ./sage -t  
 devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
 sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py 
 **
 File gap.py, line 69:
  sage: R = gap.PolynomialRing('Rationals', 2); R
 Expected:
  PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])
 Got:
  PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ])
 **
 File gap.py, line 71:
  sage: I = R.IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(); I
 Expected:
  [ x, x_2 ]
 Got:
  [ x_1, x_2 ]
 **
 File gap.py, line 86:
  sage: f = gap(str(g)); f
 Expected:
  -x^5+x_2^2
 Got:
  -x_1^5+x_2^2
 **
 1 items had failures:
 3 of  22 in __main__.example_0
 ***Test Failed*** 3 failures.
 For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_gap.py
   [2.4 s]
 exit code: 256

 --
 The following tests failed:


  sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
 Total time for all tests: 2.4 seconds
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$


 
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread Justin C. Walker 


On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:04 AM, William Stein wrote:


 I think I know what's going on.

 If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
 workspace you get the behavior I see.  If you don't install
 the optional packages you don't.  Thus one of the packages
 changes the print behavior of Gap.

 Indeed, here it is:

 gap LoadPackage(hap);
 Loading HAP 1.7.5gamma ...
 true
 gap PolynomialRing(Rationals,2);
 PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])

I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no  
optional packages installed.  If I run 'gap_console()', and then  
'LoadPackage(hap);', I get 'failed' as output.

'gap_console()' tells me it's version '4.4.10'.  'gap_reset_workspace 
()' seems to have no effect on the results.

This is a fresh install (not upgrade) of 2.8.8 on Mac OS X, 10.4.10,  
Core 2 Duo.

Justin


--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income

Experience is what you get
   when you don't get what you want.





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread William Stein 

On 10/21/07, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  gap LoadPackage(hap);
  Loading HAP 1.7.5gamma ...
  true
  gap PolynomialRing(Rationals,2);
  PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])

 I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no
 optional packages installed.  If I run 'gap_console()', and then
 'LoadPackage(hap);', I get 'failed' as output.

That's because hap is an optional package, and you don't have
it installed.

 'gap_console()' tells me it's version '4.4.10'.  'gap_reset_workspace
 ()' seems to have no effect on the results.

 This is a fresh install (not upgrade) of 2.8.8 on Mac OS X, 10.4.10,
 Core 2 Duo.

Do a sage -upgrade, and all your problems will be solved.

William

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread cwitty 

On Oct 21, 10:36 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no
 optional packages installed.  If I run 'gap_console()', and then
 'LoadPackage(hap);', I get 'failed' as output.

Yes, that's as expected.  For 2.8.8, William (accidentally) made it so
that the interface/gap.py doctests require the GAP optional packages.
So they worked for him (because he had the optional packages), but not
for most other people.

This has been fixed in 2.8.8.1 (just released a few minutes ago).  So
you can do sage -upgrade to get the fixed version.  Or you can just
do:

sage: hg_sage.pull()

followed by sage -b, and that should be a slightly faster way to get
the same fix.

Carl


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-forum] sage-2.8.8

2007-10-21 Thread John Cremona 

Successfully upgraded to 2.8.8.1 on linux (Kubuntu 7.04):

sage --testall
(...)

All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1978.6 seconds


John Cremona

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---