[Samba] disk vs print share
Is there any way to determine the share type (disk, printer, etc) of a foreign share on the network? I'm looking for a tool similar to smbtree(1) from which I can pick out only disk shares. J -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba+LDAP - so close yet so far :) ...STILL NOT SOLVED
abebe lsslp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
28.07.2004 22:11
To: Samba Samba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [Samba] Samba+LDAP - so close yet so far :) ...STILL NOT
SOLVED
Back to the real deal... I have decided not to assume anything and to
take it step by step :) Craig..I have followed your advice and I am using
'people' instead of 'Computers'.
OK, if you store Computers and Users in ou=People that's ok
NOTE:
- Have 'root= administrator' in /etc/samba/smbusers
no remove it
- Have done the appropriate chages to the xp registery
You do not need any modifications
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbldap-usershow administrator
dn: uid=Administrator,ou=Users,dc=wbcoll,dc=edu
I think you use ou=People ?!
cn: Administrator
sn: Administrator
objectClass: inetOrgPerson,sambaSAMAccount,posixAccount,shadowAccount
gidNumber: 512
uid: Administrator
uidNumber: 0
homeDirectory: /home/
sambaLogonTime: 0
sambaLogoffTime: 2147483647
sambaKickoffTime: 2147483647
sambaPwdCanChange: 0
sambaHomePath: \\EAGLEX\homes
sambaHomeDrive: H:
sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-3864350619-1217412381-2490860374-512
sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3864350619-1217412381-2490860374-2996
loginShell: /bin/false
gecos: Netbios Domain Administrator
sambaAcctFlags: [U]
sambaPwdMustChange: 1098811932
sambaLMPassword: F70389E8F4B94063AAD3B435B51404EE
sambaPwdLastSet: 1091035932
sambaNTPassword: 60BED106E19D7A3F919FA1919125FFBA
userPassword: {SSHA}3zMR3Ds/5knGujxtByOIYPjl0mVBhJgr
ERROR: (having trouble joining XP (xptest) to domain).
The following error occured attempting to join the domain AGUILAS:
'Access is denied.'
Error is shown in the LOG
And here is part of the error message in 'xptest.log':
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(219)
check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the new password interface
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(222)
check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the error.
Remove usermapping in smbusers. Administrator should not be mapped to root
!!!
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(256)
push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(364)
push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386)
pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] auth/auth_sam.c:check_sam_security(202)
check_sam_security: Couldn't find user 'root' in passdb file.
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] auth/auth_winbind.c:check_winbind_security(80)
check_winbind_security: Not using winbind, requested domain [AGUILAS] was
for this SAM.
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [administrator] - [root]
FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER
[2004/07/28 13:59:39, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:do_map_to_guest(41)
No such user administrator [AGUILAS] - using guest account
QUESTION:
1) Do I have to add 'smbpasswd -a root' or 'smbpasswd -a administrator'?
No. See comment in LOG
2) NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER ? 'pdbedit -LV administrator' shows that the
user exist
Try 'smbclient -L [YOURHOST] -UAdministrator%password'
where password is the the password you gave Administrator
you can check if you can access shares on your samba
3) do 'root' and 'administrator' have to have the same password?
No, Admnistrator only need to have the uid=0, and he has it.
If you have 2 ou, one for Users and one for Computers then you need to
have /etc/ldap.conf like as following.
This is a must have when not using NIS
#
# This is the configuration file for the LDAP nameservice
# switch library, the LDAP PAM module and the shadow package.
#
.snip
# RFC2307bis naming contexts
# Syntax:
# nss_base_XXX base?scope?filter
# where scope is {base,one,sub}
# and filter is a filter to be 'd with the
# default filter.
# You can omit the suffix eg:
# nss_base_passwd ou=People,
# to append the default base DN but this
# may incur a small performance impact.
#nss_base_passwdou=People,dc=icw,dc=com?sub # uncomment when usin
NIS
#nss_base_shadowou=People,dc=icw,dc=com?sub # uncomment when using
NIS
nss_base_group ou=Groups,dc=icw,dc=com?sub
nss_base_hosts ou=Machines,dc=icw,dc=com?sub
When any other Questions will come along, just mail me.
Christian
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Samba3 - LDAP - USRMGR.EXE
Jim C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
28.07.2004 18:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[Samba] Re: Samba3 - LDAP - USRMGR.EXE
Post your add user script line from smb.conf
You might be missing a flag or something.
add user script = smbldap-useradd -m %u
My line in was correct but /etc/ldap.conf was not.
The problem was that LDAP searches the Machine in ou=People but it should
search in ou=Machines.
So I had to modifiy /etc/ldap.conf as following
---snip
# RFC2307bis naming contexts
# Syntax:
# nss_base_XXX base?scope?filter
# where scope is {base,one,sub}
# and filter is a filter to be 'd with the
# default filter.
# You can omit the suffix eg:
# nss_base_passwd ou=People,
# to append the default base DN but this
# may incur a small performance impact.
#nss_base_passwdou=People,dc=icw,dc=com?sub
#nss_base_shadowou=People,dc=icw,dc=com?sub
nss_base_group ou=Groups,dc=icw,dc=com?sub
nss_base_hosts ou=Machines,dc=icw,dc=com?sub
I needed to comment nss_base_passwd, nss_base_shadow ( not using NIS ,
Jerome Tournier)
Now it works without any problems
Thanks
Christian
--
-
| I can be reached on the following Instant Messenger services: |
|---|
| MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: WyteLi0n ICQ: 123291844 |
|---|
| Y!: j_c_llings Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] need some advice
hi, i've several - for me - big problems. i've posted here several times and only got generic or no replies. as my problmes ge more and more urgent i need some help. where can i get this ? what do i have to do. i'm realy desperate .. TIA -- Matthias Henze[EMAIL PROTECTED] Use PGP!! http://www.mhcsoftware.de/MatthiasHenze.asc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MHC SoftWare GmbH voice: +49-(0)9533-92006-0 Fichtera 17 fax: +49-(0)9533-92006-6 96274 Itzgrund/Germanye-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - pgp2GpigbO6rt.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation
Il gio, 2004-07-29 alle 07:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: That is for roaming profiles, right ? Why would I want to set that ? No, isn't. but you have to try; 'cos, in my opinion, of course, you won't login in bdc; but, the roaming profiles (home directory) must be in pdc; if that works, you will try set (in bdc): logon path = \\PDC\blablabla... (for win nt) logon home = blablabla (for win 9x) where PDC is the ip address of pdc. blablabla is the share; u. That's not good if the user logs on from another site; the profile would have to come over the internet to his laptop. Or am I mistaking ? Bert Umberto Zanatta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/07/2004 20:46 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation You should try set logon path = u. Il mer, 2004-07-28 alle 15:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: It becomes VERY weird... This afternoon I witnessed the following : the user logged on to his pc; accessed his home directory on the PDC; no problema; accessed another share on the PDC; no problema; accessed a share on the BDC : connection refused. Going back to the PDC to access the home directory : connection refused. However; there were NO error entries in the logs on either Samba server. Only entries like these : [2004/07/28 13:29:38, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) allier (192.168.0.190) connect to service cvs initially as user mschijva (uid=1015, gid=100) (pid 22284) I'm completely lost now Bert De Ridder Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/07/2004 11:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation Hi, what os does the client have? W98? in the system-controll folder there should be a icon (in german called Verwaltung) whre the local policies , the settings for odbc ...and mor are... there should be also an icon called eventmanager / display... maybe there is a log entry? Did you see some errrors on the samba side (instead of the connection reset by peer) if you try a higher debug-/log-level? the other way is, that you back-up the users home-directory, and his roaming-profile and completely remove him and (from windows / ldap / samba ...) and readd him as a new user with a empty home and profile-directory... and then just put the saved-files (from the profile / homedirectory in the new created profile / home-directory in. it could be that there are some settings in the profile are wrong. -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 08:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation Yes, I have checked the LDAP entry; I even recreated it; I tried the user/pwd on 3 other machines : 2000 Prof. Wks; 2000 Server and XP Prof. The local permissions on the machine are OK; I can add the domain user to the local admin. group, so that should be ok. I agree that it is not a server-side issue; but where on the client can I start searching for errors ? Regards, Bert De Ridder PeopleWare NV - Head Office Cdt.Weynsstraat 85 B-2660 Hoboken Tel: +32 3 448.33.38 Fax: +32 3 448.32.66 PeopleWare NV - Branch Office Geel Kleinhoefstraat 5 B-2440 Geel Tel: +32 14 57.00.90 Fax: +32 14 58.13.25 http://www.peopleware.be http://www.mobileware.be Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27/07/2004 17:56 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, did you check the ldap-entry for that user?? maybe there is a mistake... are the other workstations you tried w2k too? are the local permissions on the workstation for that user correct??? maybe there is a local-policy... maybe there is a user-workstation entry in the ldapaccount... i don?t think that it has something to do with the configuration of the samba /ldap servers, because other pc?s on the same segment have no problems. -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juli 2004 16:51 An: Umberto Zanatta
[Samba] force create mode issue
Dear List, I'd like to report my observations on a Samba new file permissions problem for which I found dozens of support requests on the net without any useful replies. Hopefully, my observations help identify the root cause of this issue which also seems to occur with new Samba versions 3.0.x. In our domain we operate a file server under Samba 2.2.8a as PDC. Overall we are delighted with Samba. Many thanks and compliments to the Samba team. There is only one slightly annoying issue with new file permissions. 1. PDC »maestro« hosts 2 Samba shares named »parent« and »child« which are set up as: [parent] path=/home/data/parent writeable=Yes [child] path=/home/data/parent/child browseable=No writeable=Yes oplocks=no level2 oplocks=no create mode = 0770 force create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 2. The Linux permissions on both directories »parent« and »child« are: drwxrwx--- root users i.e. members of the users group have rwx permissions. 3. On our Windows NT and XP client machines we have mapped the »parent« share to network drive X: 4. If user »otto« who is a member of the users group accesses the »child« share via »X:\child« and creates a new file or directory, the new file/directory permissions are set to: -rwxr--r-- otto users or drwxr-xr-x otto users This agrees with the Samba default »create mode 755« but is not not what we expect considering the »create mode« and »force create mode« settings of the »child« share. 5. Now, if user »otto« accesses the »child« share via »\\maestro\child« and creates a new file or directory the permissions are set to: -rwxrwx--- otto users or drwxrwx--- otto users This is what we want. From above it appears that with regard to new file permissions Samba distinguishes between the two different access paths to the »child« share, i.e. »X:\child« or»\\maestro\child« Any feedback and advice are most welcome. Best regards, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: FW: [Samba] Samba printers print$
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 11:36, Kyle Miller wrote: My [print$] section is pretty basic (I'm connecting as 'kyle', who is also defined as a printer admin in global. Included global for completeness, even though it's uninteresting.) : [global] workgroup = TESTGROUP netbios name = KYLESMB server string = Samba Server for Testing log level = 4 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 dns proxy = No printer admin = kyle show add printer wizard = Yes [print$] comment = Print Driver Auto-Download path = /etc/samba/drivers write list = kyle read only = Yes browseable = No guest ok = No My /etc/drivers/samba looks like this. Only a W32X86 dir, since that's the only platform on which I have clients. [kyle]$ ls -al /etc/samba/drivers total 12 drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 4096 Jul 7 13:42 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 12 15:11 .. drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 Jul 7 13:42 W32X86 Any thoughts? Thanks, Kyle On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:37:21 -0400, Marcus White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW... Did you create the directory list similar to this in your drivers directory? [print$]--+ |--W32X86 # serves drivers to Windows NT x86 |--WIN40# serves drivers to Windows 95/98 |--W32ALPHA # serves drivers to Windows NT Alpha_AXP |--W32MIPS # serves drivers to Windows NT R4000 |--W32PPC # serves drivers to Windows NT PowerPC Marcus O. On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 09:56, Kyle Miller wrote: For what it's worth, I too have the same problem, which I posted to the list about a few weeks ago (unfortunately no response). I was following the section of the HOWTO that you linked to below. I think it's possible that there is a missing step in the documentation. I can print to my printer just fine, but cannot upload the drivers using the APW, as documented in the howto, even though my permissions appear to be correct. If anyone might be able to shed some more light on it, I'd sure appreciate it. In my case, details are in my previous email to the list, or I can provide them again. Maybe we can find some similarity between my setup and this guy's setup that leads to the problem. Kyle Please check out this link: http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/printing.html#id2550771 HTH, Marcus O. Do you have a [printers] section defined in the smb.conf file? Which linux printer system (ie cups, lprng, bsd) are you using? Have you tried adding root to the [print$] write list and using the root (admin) account to add drivers? Marcus O. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Joining Linux to Windows 2000 domain
Make sure winbind is running (have you edited nsswitch.conf to include winbind?) and that nscd is not running. You can stop nscd and restart all the samba services with `/etc/init.d/nscd stop` then `/etc/init.d/smb restart` `/etc/init.d/nmb restart` `/etc/init.d/winbind restart` Hope this helps Tim Barone wrote: Hello, I am new to Linux, Samba, and actually servers in general. I am attempting to set up a Linux file server and join it to a Windows 2000 domain. All I want to be able to do is get files from the linux file server and put files on it. I do not want it to be the domain controller. I join the domain using: net join -S 10.10.10.40 -UAdministrator%password It tells me that I have joined the domain. wbinfo -t wbinfo -p work fine! Wbinfo -u gives me: Error looking up domain members Wbinfo -g gives me: Error looking up domain groups Any ideas on what to do? Thanks a bunch! Linux is Fedora Core 1 Samba is 3.0 smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = EIIECOMM netbios name = e2efileserver1 realm = EIIECOMM.COM idmap uid = 1 - 15000 idmap gid = 1 - 15000 winbind separator = + winbind use default domain = Yes use sendfile = Yes server string= Samba Server printcap anme = /etc/printer load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 security = domain password server = * socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = no os level = 33 wins support = no wins server = 10.10.10.40 (I'm not sure this is a wins server) dns proxy = no [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S browseable = yes writeable = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp writeable = yes guest ok = yes [public] comment = Data path = /export/public public = yes writeable = yes _ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Drive mapping failing
Hi, I have a 2.2.8 Samba server setup here that is mapping Unix home directories to a drive at login for Windows XP and Win2K Pro desktops. I'm using server level security, the password server being an Active Directory server. This works consistantly well. I've introduced a Win2K Server with terminal services and Samba will fail to authenticate after only a very few logins complaining that the password or username is invalid. I also periodically get System error 1326 has occurred Has anyone else used Samba in this way and seen an issue with Win2K Server? smb.conf included. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = ANALOG server string = acesn19 Samba Server Version 2.2.8 security = SERVER password server = hostname.domainname username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/smbusers log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m disable spoolss = Yes dns proxy = No [homes] comment = Home Directories username = %S read only = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /usr/local/samba/spool printable = Yes browseable = No [cadtools] comment = Cadtools directory path = /design/cad guest ok = Yes [ghost] comment = Cadtools directory path = /design/cad/ghost read only = No guest ok = Yes Cheers, Bob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
Hoi, On 27-jul-04, at 12:43, Gabor Kiss [Bitman] wrote: For example: smbmount //server/share /mountpoint -o uid=100,gid=100 makes all the files owned by uid 100 on a 2.4 kernel. The same command on a 2.6 kernel makes the mountpoint owned by uid 100, the rest of the files have the uid's as set on the server. Is CONFIG_SMB_UNIX enabled in 2.4 kernels? | CONFIG_SMB_UNIX: | | Enabling this will make smbfs use the CIFS Unix Extensions if | supported by the server. These extensions allows use of unix user | ids, permissions, file modes, symlinks, etc that normally do not | work on smbfs. | | Samba 3.0 servers supports these extensions. No, that is not enabled, but I can't find the option in the .config of 2.4 or 2.6. But this makes my question why does the option CONFIG_SMB_UNIX makes some the configuration options and some of the command line options obsolete. Especially when they are so 'handy' when you want to share some files. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Voorzitter NLLGG http://www.nllgg.nl/ icq: 7153298 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: FW: [Samba] Samba printers print$
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 11:36, Kyle Miller wrote: My [print$] section is pretty basic (I'm connecting as 'kyle', who is also defined as a printer admin in global. Included global for completeness, even though it's uninteresting.) : [global] workgroup = TESTGROUP netbios name = KYLESMB server string = Samba Server for Testing log level = 4 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 dns proxy = No printer admin = kyle show add printer wizard = Yes [print$] comment = Print Driver Auto-Download path = /etc/samba/drivers write list = kyle read only = Yes browseable = No guest ok = No My /etc/drivers/samba looks like this. Only a W32X86 dir, since that's the only platform on which I have clients. [kyle]$ ls -al /etc/samba/drivers total 12 drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 4096 Jul 7 13:42 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 12 15:11 .. drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 Jul 7 13:42 W32X86 Any thoughts? Thanks, Kyle On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:37:21 -0400, Marcus White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW... Did you create the directory list similar to this in your drivers directory? [print$]--+ |--W32X86 # serves drivers to Windows NT x86 |--WIN40# serves drivers to Windows 95/98 |--W32ALPHA # serves drivers to Windows NT Alpha_AXP |--W32MIPS # serves drivers to Windows NT R4000 |--W32PPC # serves drivers to Windows NT PowerPC Marcus O. On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 09:56, Kyle Miller wrote: For what it's worth, I too have the same problem, which I posted to the list about a few weeks ago (unfortunately no response). I was following the section of the HOWTO that you linked to below. I think it's possible that there is a missing step in the documentation. I can print to my printer just fine, but cannot upload the drivers using the APW, as documented in the howto, even though my permissions appear to be correct. If anyone might be able to shed some more light on it, I'd sure appreciate it. In my case, details are in my previous email to the list, or I can provide them again. Maybe we can find some similarity between my setup and this guy's setup that leads to the problem. Kyle Please check out this link: http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/printing.html#id2550771 HTH, Marcus O. FYI... Here is a link to a pdf version of the Samba By Example book. http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf Marcus O. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation
Hi, i?m wondering about that this behavior is only for one user.. why does another user in the same segment of the domain not behave similar? How did you changed the users to try?? Did you just log of the user mschijva and logged on with a diffrent user again.. or did you restart the computer and logged in as a diffrent user? just a silly question: when this is the only one user with that behavior why you don?t give him a new username? Did you checked the uid / samba-SID and any nurmeric value of that user in his ldap-entry? -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 15:09 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation It becomes VERY weird... This afternoon I witnessed the following : the user logged on to his pc; accessed his home directory on the PDC; no problema; accessed another share on the PDC; no problema; accessed a share on the BDC : connection refused. Going back to the PDC to access the home directory : connection refused. However; there were NO error entries in the logs on either Samba server. Only entries like these : [2004/07/28 13:29:38, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) allier (192.168.0.190) connect to service cvs initially as user mschijva (uid=1015, gid=100) (pid 22284) I'm completely lost now Bert De Ridder Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/07/2004 11:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, what os does the client have? W98? in the system-controll folder there should be a icon (in german called Verwaltung) whre the local policies , the settings for odbc ...and mor are... there should be also an icon called eventmanager / display... maybe there is a log entry? Did you see some errrors on the samba side (instead of the connection reset by peer) if you try a higher debug-/log-level? the other way is, that you back-up the users home-directory, and his roaming-profile and completely remove him and (from windows / ldap / samba ...) and readd him as a new user with a empty home and profile-directory... and then just put the saved-files (from the profile / homedirectory in the new created profile / home-directory in. it could be that there are some settings in the profile are wrong. -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 08:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation Yes, I have checked the LDAP entry; I even recreated it; I tried the user/pwd on 3 other machines : 2000 Prof. Wks; 2000 Server and XP Prof. The local permissions on the machine are OK; I can add the domain user to the local admin. group, so that should be ok. I agree that it is not a server-side issue; but where on the client can I start searching for errors ? Regards, Bert De Ridder PeopleWare NV - Head Office Cdt.Weynsstraat 85 B-2660 Hoboken Tel: +32 3 448.33.38 Fax: +32 3 448.32.66 PeopleWare NV - Branch Office Geel Kleinhoefstraat 5 B-2440 Geel Tel: +32 14 57.00.90 Fax: +32 14 58.13.25 http://www.peopleware.be http://www.mobileware.be Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27/07/2004 17:56 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, did you check the ldap-entry for that user?? maybe there is a mistake... are the other workstations you tried w2k too? are the local permissions on the workstation for that user correct??? maybe there is a local-policy... maybe there is a user-workstation entry in the ldapaccount... i don?t think that it has something to do with the configuration of the samba /ldap servers, because other pc?s on the same segment have no problems. -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juli 2004 16:51 An: Umberto Zanatta Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation Yes, but I hadn't included that in my previous post; I tried to trim the message winbind uid = 100-2 winbind gid = 100-2 winbind separator = + winbind use default domain = Yes I am not using password server, because i want Samba to
[Samba] ntml_auth and local security authority
hi all, I am running a squid cache using ntml_auth samba util. It works great when the users have joined the domain, since then ie sends DOMAIN\Username NTML information. But it fails when there is a road warrior, which has not joined the domain, but has created a username an password which is identical to a domain user. This way for instance the windows smb system lets them in without having to join the domain. I wanted to install a hook for changing the DOMAIN on certain conditions, but after reading through some NTML specs, I found out that DOMAINUSER field is encrypted with the password key and that I would have to dig in really deep in the ntlmssp to do the changes, which is somehow not what I want. So my question: could the ntlmssp authentication in samba could use the security authority of the domain supplied by the client. so for instance, if the client sends in MYCOMPUTER\User, could the windbind subsystem be configured to contact the local security authority of that user instead of contacting the DOMAIN controller? Perhaps someone could give me a rough overview of the authentication process used by ntmlssp. ( which modules are called when; ntml_auth calles libsmb, ... ) ntml_auth servers as a ntlm server proxy right? (doing manage_squid_ntmlssp_request) So when the client sends in its requests it does the server part, but where in ntlmsssp.c does it communicate with the domain controller or securty authority to testify the password is correct? And a thrid question: Would it be easier using kerberos here? If the client is a road warrior but has established a kerberos tgt with the server, could that be reused with the squid cache (granted I would have to create a squid server service key, but that should be no problem) Perhaps someone has some experience with that? thanks -- Jakob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Joining Domain
Good Day, I downloaded samba-2.2.9, installed and configuted it on a Solaris 5.7 system. I have configured it as a PDC, however whenever i try to join the domain i have created, Windows ask that i enter a username and password authorized to join systems to the domain. Normally with a Windows 2000 server entering the administrators username and password will do it, however I get this error message: The following error occured attempting to join the domain sambadomain.net: Logon failure:unknown user name or bad password. How can i correct this error. Thanks for your anticipated co-operation Dada O.W. (M.C.P.) Network Administrator -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
smbmount //server/share /mountpoint -o uid=100,gid=100 makes all the files owned by uid 100 on a 2.4 kernel. The same command on a 2.6 kernel makes the mountpoint owned by uid 100, the rest of the files have the uid's as set on the server. Is CONFIG_SMB_UNIX enabled in 2.4 kernels? | CONFIG_SMB_UNIX: | | Enabling this will make smbfs use the CIFS Unix Extensions if | supported by the server. These extensions allows use of unix user | ids, permissions, file modes, symlinks, etc that normally do not | work on smbfs. | | Samba 3.0 servers supports these extensions. No, that is not enabled, but I can't find the option in the .config of 2.4 or 2.6. This is true for 2.6 (I guess extensions are always enabled) but my 2.4 config is here: # # Network File Systems # ... CONFIG_SMB_FS=m CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE=utf8 CONFIG_SMB_UNIX=y Gabor -- E-mail = m-mail * c-mail ^ 2 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re:
Asslam aleakum Thank you for contacting UrduPoint.com. If you wrote about some question or problem, we will respond as soon as we can. Our response time varies with the volume of questions received, but it's important to us to provide a response. Your patience is appreciated. If you offered comments or suggestions, thank you for taking the time to contact us. We value your feedback. Your suggestion is valued and will be considered by the appropriate personnel. Knowing user likes and dislikes is very important in helping us continue to create a better and more relevant site. However, due to the volume of emails we receive, we cannot respond to each one. Sincerely, The UrduPoint.com Team The future of Pakistan http://www.UrduPoint.com (This is an auto generated Message) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Joining Domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (gbengadada) Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29.07.2004 11:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:[Samba] Joining Domain Good Day, I downloaded samba-2.2.9, installed and configuted it on a Solaris 5.7 system. I have configured it as a PDC, however whenever i try to join the domain i have created, Windows ask that i enter a username and password authorized to join systems to the domain. Normally with a Windows 2000 server entering the administrators username and password will do it, however I get this error message: The following error occured attempting to join the domain sambadomain.net: Logon failure:unknown user name or bad password. How can i correct this error. If you try to use Administrator for joining machine to domain you should have a User Administrator on Unix-side with uid=0. And don't forget to add Administrator to smbpasswd if you use this file as backend. Then it should work. Thanks for your anticipated co-operation No problem. Christian --- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
Hi, On 29-jul-04, at 12:26, Gabor Kiss [Bitman] wrote: smbmount //server/share /mountpoint -o uid=100,gid=100 makes all the files owned by uid 100 on a 2.4 kernel. The same command on a 2.6 kernel makes the mountpoint owned by uid 100, the rest of the files have the uid's as set on the server. Is CONFIG_SMB_UNIX enabled in 2.4 kernels? | CONFIG_SMB_UNIX: | | Enabling this will make smbfs use the CIFS Unix Extensions if | supported by the server. These extensions allows use of unix user | ids, permissions, file modes, symlinks, etc that normally do not | work on smbfs. | | Samba 3.0 servers supports these extensions. No, that is not enabled, but I can't find the option in the .config of 2.4 or 2.6. This is true for 2.6 (I guess extensions are always enabled) but my 2.4 config is here: # # Network File Systems # ... CONFIG_SMB_FS=m CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE=utf8 CONFIG_SMB_UNIX=y I think your Linux vendor has patched your sources. Because if I look in the original sources (http://lxr.linux.no/source/arch/i386/defconfig?v=2.4.26) there is no such option. On the other hand, it doesn't make clear why several options need to be ignored. Greetings, Micha Kersloot http://www.kovoks.nl/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation
I have tried everything : logging of the user; rebooting machines... I have thought about giving a new username; but there are lots of programs installed on his machine; all with registry dependencies (Delphi 5 for one) and creating a new user would make him loose all his settings (we don't save the profile on the servers) Samba sid et all are correct. Bert De Ridder Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/07/2004 11:01 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, i?m wondering about that this behavior is only for one user.. why does another user in the same segment of the domain not behave similar? How did you changed the users to try?? Did you just log of the user mschijva and logged on with a diffrent user again.. or did you restart the computer and logged in as a diffrent user? just a silly question: when this is the only one user with that behavior why you don?t give him a new username? Did you checked the uid / samba-SID and any nurmeric value of that user in his ldap-entry? -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 15:09 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation It becomes VERY weird... This afternoon I witnessed the following : the user logged on to his pc; accessed his home directory on the PDC; no problema; accessed another share on the PDC; no problema; accessed a share on the BDC : connection refused. Going back to the PDC to access the home directory : connection refused. However; there were NO error entries in the logs on either Samba server. Only entries like these : [2004/07/28 13:29:38, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) allier (192.168.0.190) connect to service cvs initially as user mschijva (uid=1015, gid=100) (pid 22284) I'm completely lost now Bert De Ridder Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/07/2004 11:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, what os does the client have? W98? in the system-controll folder there should be a icon (in german called Verwaltung) whre the local policies , the settings for odbc ...and mor are... there should be also an icon called eventmanager / display... maybe there is a log entry? Did you see some errrors on the samba side (instead of the connection reset by peer) if you try a higher debug-/log-level? the other way is, that you back-up the users home-directory, and his roaming-profile and completely remove him and (from windows / ldap / samba ...) and readd him as a new user with a empty home and profile-directory... and then just put the saved-files (from the profile / homedirectory in the new created profile / home-directory in. it could be that there are some settings in the profile are wrong. -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 08:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation Yes, I have checked the LDAP entry; I even recreated it; I tried the user/pwd on 3 other machines : 2000 Prof. Wks; 2000 Server and XP Prof. The local permissions on the machine are OK; I can add the domain user to the local admin. group, so that should be ok. I agree that it is not a server-side issue; but where on the client can I start searching for errors ? Regards, Bert De Ridder PeopleWare NV - Head Office Cdt.Weynsstraat 85 B-2660 Hoboken Tel: +32 3 448.33.38 Fax: +32 3 448.32.66 PeopleWare NV - Branch Office Geel Kleinhoefstraat 5 B-2440 Geel Tel: +32 14 57.00.90 Fax: +32 14 58.13.25 http://www.peopleware.be http://www.mobileware.be Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27/07/2004 17:56 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, did you check the ldap-entry for that user?? maybe there is a mistake... are the other workstations you tried w2k too? are the local permissions on the workstation for that user correct??? maybe there is a local-policy... maybe there is a user-workstation entry in the ldapaccount... i don?t think that it has something to do with the configuration of the samba /ldap servers, because other pc?s on the same
Re: [Samba] need some advice
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 05:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i've several - for me - big problems. i've posted here several times and only got generic or no replies. as my problmes ge more and more urgent i need some help. where can i get this ? what do i have to do. i'm realy desperate .. Matthias, please, in one long drawn out e-mail, again: 1. List your problems, as quite detailed as possible. Including Samba version, configure options used, what type of environment you are using besides samba, the OSes involved with the problems. 2. List your steps you have taken to solve these issues, including google search queries used (just the search terms), options enabled/disabled/changed, Libraries you have updated, and so on. 3. Give us Level 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 samba log snippets showing the problems, the error codes the Windows side is getting. 4. Give us a sanitized copies of you smb.conf, krb5.conf, slapd.conf and any other conf you are using... including scripts to add users, delete users etc Otherwise, you will only get a generic response. *IF* someone can get their arms around you problem, they may post a few fixes that may or may not work. This is the way of this list, we are not GODS (well except Jerry, John and Gerald (plus a few others on the samba team)) -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
but my 2.4 config is here:
#
# Network File Systems
#
...
CONFIG_SMB_FS=m
CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT=y
CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE=utf8
CONFIG_SMB_UNIX=y
I think your Linux vendor has patched your sources. Because if I look
in the original sources
I compile myself my kernels from original sources.
(http://lxr.linux.no/source/arch/i386/defconfig?v=2.4.26) there is no
such option.
This because CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set.
Check the _original_ source:
$ ls -l linux-2.4.26/fs/smbfs/proc.c
-rw-r--r--1 root root 83490 Apr 14 15:05 linux-2.4.26/fs/smbfs/proc.c
$
Its content:
int
smb_newconn(struct smb_sb_info *server, struct smb_conn_opt *opt)
{
...
#ifndef CONFIG_SMB_UNIX
server-opt.capabilities = ~SMB_CAP_UNIX;
#endif
if (server-opt.capabilities SMB_CAP_UNIX) {
struct inode *inode;
VERBOSE(Using UNIX CIFS extensions\n);
install_ops(server-ops, smb_ops_unix);
inode = SB_of(server)-s_root-d_inode;
if (inode)
inode-i_op = smb_dir_inode_operations_unix;
}
linux-2.4.26/fs/smbfs/Changelog writes:
2004-01-24 John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* *.c: Implementation of CIFS Extensions for UNIX systems
such option. On the other hand, it doesn't make clear why several
options need to be ignored.
I've no inten^H^H^Hformation to answer this question. ;-)
I just pointed out that you CAN achieve identical (however unwanted)
behavior of 2.4 and 2.6 smbfs implementation.
Gabor
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Redundancy in samba
Hi. I'm new to samba, so I don't know many things. I have a big infrastructure based on kerberos, ldap and afs. All our linux clients log nicely on the cell, no problem. The problem is as everywhere... windows. I'm trying to make windows log on the cell, using samba (I will try tomorrow to set up a domain). The questions about samba will come later on, so expect me to bother you :) Now, I have more than one server supplying all the needed services, and I ask you: is it possible to set up more than one pc supplying samba services for the same domain? -- Senseimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icqnum:241572242 msn-id:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Error: Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot login to PDC(FreeBSD boxen) from client(win XP)
I'm well aware of that. I didn't say new to networking, just windows networking. :)) They both have different names and there are only two pc's, the PDC and the XP client. I've changed the XP machines name repeatedly and rebooted each time as the machine requests and it still doesn't work. I only wish it was easy as the error says. Thanks for your reply though! Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 11:08, Chris E wrote: I'm finally getting somewhere in setting up my FreeBSD PDC. I try and login via my XP client and now it gives me this odd message. Cannot login because a duplicate user already exists on the network. Please goto control panel and system and change your computer name. Sorta paraphrased there, perhaps off by a word or two but that's pretty much what it tells me. I'm just using system users and smbpasswd for setting up users. Not sure what other info may be needed. The following is my smb.conf and my logs. I'm new to Samba and windows networking in general so go easy. =) Thanks in advance. --- basic network rule = each computer must have a different name. Windows XP - Start - Settings - Control Panel - System Computer Name (tab) - Change Name (pick something unique) Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and ISA Server
Hi everybody, I have a Samba 3.0.4 PDC configured on my network. Previously, there was a Windows NT 4 PDC, that was migrated to my Samba / OpenLDAP configuration. Everything is working fine, except our ISA Server. Indeed, ISA Server was previously configured to let users that belong to the Internet Access group to surf. During the migration phase, we did not change anything. Now it works, but very very slowly, and by far slower than before the migration. Tracing the network data between the ISA server and the Samba Server, and having a look at the openLDAP log file make me think that ISA Server tries to authenticate user for each request, and not once per session. Indeed, I've got much network traffic, lots a LDAP requests like that : Jul 29 15:22:36 ldap slapd[25440]: conn=2 op= SRCH base=dc=test,dc=fr scope=2 filter=((uid=USER1)(objectClass=sambaSamAccount)) and much load on the server, because of slapd processes. If I turn off ISA server, everything is OK and normal. So is NTLM authentication different in Samba than in Windows NT PDC ? What would you advise me ? Many thanks Julien -- My smb.conf file : [Global] workgroup = RUEIL1 netbios name = LDAP server string = SAMBA-LDAP PDC username map = /etc/samba/smbusers encrypt passwords = yes interfaces = 172.16.0.115/16 domain logons = Yes os level = 65 domain master = Yes local master = Yes preferred master = Yes security = user wins support = Yes name resolve order = wins bcast lmhosts host admin users = install administrateur passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost ldap admin dn = cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=mairie-rueilmalmaison,dc=fr ldap ssl = off ldap delete dn = yes ldap user suffix = ou=Utilisateurs ldap group suffix = ou=Groupes ldap machine suffix = ou=Machines ldap suffix = dc=mairie-rueilmalmaison,dc=fr ldap idmap suffix = ou=Utilisateurs ldap passwd sync = yes Dos charset = 850 Unix charset = ISO8859-1 log level = 1 #log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 10 time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY logon script = logon.bat logon drive = H: logon home = logon path = add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w %u add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m %u add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p %g add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g #delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x %u %g set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g %g %u [homes] comment = Rpertoires utilisateurs valid users = %U read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon browseable = No read only = Yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] move samba file and print shares
Hello all Is this possible?: samba3.0.3pre2 running as domain member with winbind, acls on reiser providing file security this is all on a seperate disk mounted as 'data1' Could I take this disk, put it in a new box, mount it again as data1, then copy the old smb.conf over to the new box? (I would also join the domain with the same name as the old box) Thanks in advance, H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] need some advice
hi greg, thanks for you reply - just unbelivable that i got one ... --On Donnerstag, Juli 29, 2004 08:16:15 -0400 Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | 1. List your problems, as quite detailed as possible. Including Samba | version, configure options used, what type of environment you are using | besides samba, the OSes involved with the problems. i've tried all these - what i got was a generic response - e.g. don't use win98, use w2k - this is not constructive i think ... | 2. List your steps you have taken to solve these issues, including | google search queries used (just the search terms), options | enabled/disabled/changed, Libraries you have updated, and so on. | | 3. Give us Level 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 samba log snippets showing the | problems, the error codes the Windows side is getting. | | 4. Give us a sanitized copies of you smb.conf, krb5.conf, slapd.conf and | any other conf you are using... including scripts to add users, delete | users etc well there we hit an other problem of this ML, the size limit. this will generate easylie mail's of 3, 4 or more MB. i've treid to place logs etc. to my website - without a single reply to my requests. | Otherwise, you will only get a generic response. *IF* someone can get | their arms around you problem, they may post a few fixes that may or may | not work. This is the way of this list, we are not GODS (well except | Jerry, John and Gerald (plus a few others on the samba team)) sorry, but i'm very, very, frustrated at the moment ... but, i will try this again. lets see if i can get a constructive response ... cheers matthias -- Matthias Henze[EMAIL PROTECTED] Use PGP!! http://www.mhcsoftware.de/MatthiasHenze.asc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MHC SoftWare GmbH voice: +49-(0)9533-92006-0 Fichtera 17 fax: +49-(0)9533-92006-6 96274 Itzgrund/Germanye-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - pgpj60ilz1h2L.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and ISA Server
Your ISA server is searching USER1 on ldap server. Did you migrate all users? You should try: # ldapsearch -x -W -D 'cn=admin,dc=test,dc=fr uid=USER1 or # ldapsearch -w -D -D 'cn=admin,dc=test,dc=fr all.ldif. it will make a text file with all information about your ldap db. where cn=admin,dc=test,dc=fr is your admin user in ldap system (look at slapd.conf) (binddn) On request give your bind ldap password. Il gio, 2004-07-29 alle 15:30, Julien Bordet ha scritto: Hi everybody, I have a Samba 3.0.4 PDC configured on my network. Previously, there was a Windows NT 4 PDC, that was migrated to my Samba / OpenLDAP configuration. Everything is working fine, except our ISA Server. Indeed, ISA Server was previously configured to let users that belong to the Internet Access group to surf. During the migration phase, we did not change anything. Now it works, but very very slowly, and by far slower than before the migration. Tracing the network data between the ISA server and the Samba Server, and having a look at the openLDAP log file make me think that ISA Server tries to authenticate user for each request, and not once per session. Indeed, I've got much network traffic, lots a LDAP requests like that : Jul 29 15:22:36 ldap slapd[25440]: conn=2 op= SRCH base=dc=test,dc=fr scope=2 filter=((uid=USER1)(objectClass=sambaSamAccount)) and much load on the server, because of slapd processes. If I turn off ISA server, everything is OK and normal. So is NTLM authentication different in Samba than in Windows NT PDC ? What would you advise me ? Many thanks Julien -- My smb.conf file : [Global] workgroup = RUEIL1 netbios name = LDAP server string = SAMBA-LDAP PDC username map = /etc/samba/smbusers encrypt passwords = yes interfaces = 172.16.0.115/16 domain logons = Yes os level = 65 domain master = Yes local master = Yes preferred master = Yes security = user wins support = Yes name resolve order = wins bcast lmhosts host admin users = install administrateur passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost ldap admin dn = cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=mairie-rueilmalmaison,dc=fr ldap ssl = off ldap delete dn = yes ldap user suffix = ou=Utilisateurs ldap group suffix = ou=Groupes ldap machine suffix = ou=Machines ldap suffix = dc=mairie-rueilmalmaison,dc=fr ldap idmap suffix = ou=Utilisateurs ldap passwd sync = yes Dos charset = 850 Unix charset = ISO8859-1 log level = 1 #log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 10 time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY logon script = logon.bat logon drive = H: logon home = logon path = add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w %u add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m %u add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p %g add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g #delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x %u %g set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g %g %u [homes] comment = Rpertoires utilisateurs valid users = %U read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon browseable = No read only = Yes __ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba ___ Umberto Zanatta linuxDidattica tel: +39 (335) 54 71 385 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://linuxdidattica.org ___ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2003 KDC and Samba
We have serveral RHEL 3.0 Update 2 servers running Samba.
These have been working flawlessly for several months..
Recently, the base upgraded all the Windows 2000 servers
to Windows 2003..
NOTE: we don't have admin rights to the Domain Controllers.. (wish we did..)
Previous to the Domain (and kdc) controllers to 2003 we had
no issues joining a new Samba Sever to the ADS..
Using the same krb5.conf and kdc.conf and smb.conf file.. it
is no longer possible to join a Samba 3.0 server to the domain..
Any help direction is appreciated..
VR
Charles
Samba packages
-
samba-common-3.0.4-6.3E
samba-3.0.4-6.3E
samba-client-3.0.4-6.3E
Kerberos Packages..
-
pam_krb5-1.73-1
krb5-libs-1.2.7-24
krb5-workstation-1.2.7-24
krbafs-1.1.1-11
krbafs-utils-1.1.1-11
krb5-server-1.2.7-24
krbafs-devel-1.1.1-11
krb5-devel-1.2.7-24
Things tried..(per the samba docs. this is the first step..)
kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
error..
kinit(v5): KRB5 error code 52 while getting initial credentials
net ads join /IT/Computers/Servers-2 -U adminOFthisOU
error..
kerberos_kinit_password [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed: KRB5 error
code 52
Not much on google about this error..
krb5.conf
**
logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
ticket_lifetime = 24000
default_realm = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
# default_tgs_enctypes = rc4-hmac
# default_tkt_enctypes = rc4-hmac
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = false
[realms]
USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL = {
kdc = xxx.xxx.xxx.241:88
admin_server = xxx.xxx.xxx.241:749
default_domain = usaf.af.mil
}
[domain_realm]
.usaf.af.mil = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
usaf.af.mil = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
[kdc]
profile = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kdc.conf
[appdefaults]
pam = {
debug = false
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = false
*
kdc.conf
*
[kdcdefaults]
acl_file = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kadm5.acl
dict_file = /usr/share/dict/words
admin_keytab = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kadm5.keytab
v4_mode = nopreauth
[realms]
USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL = {
master_key_type = des-cbc-crc
supported_enctypes = des3-cbc-sha1:normal des3-cbc-sha1:norealm
des3-cbc-sha1:onlyrealm des-cbc-crc:v4 des-cbc-crc:afs3 des-cbc-crc:normal
des-cbc-crc:norealm des-cbc-crc:onlyrealm des-cbc-md4:v4 des-cbc-md4:afs3
des-cbc-md4:normal des-cbc-md4:norealm des-cbc-md4:onlyrealm des-cbc-md5:v4
des-cbc-md5:afs3 des-cbc-md5:normal des-cbc-md5:norealm
des-cbc-md5:onlyrealm des-cbc-sha1:v4 des-cbc-sha1:afs3 des-cbc-sha1:normal
des-cbc-sha1:norealm des-cbc-sha1:onlyrealm
}
*
smb.conf
*[global]
workgroup = USAF-2K
realm = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
server string =
security = ADS
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = xxx.xxx.xxx.241
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 0
announce version = 5.0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 10.50.1.52
ldap ssl = no
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
template shell = /bin/bash
# winbind separator = +
# valid users = @oracle
printing = cups
[testshare]
comment = System Share
path = /home2/share
force group = share
writeable = yes
case sensitive = Yes
hide dot files = No
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Joining Domain
I think with Samba2 you still need to turn off one of the paramenters in the registery. I don't remember the name exactly something about sign or seal. -- Kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tware.com... [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gbengadada) Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29.07.2004 11:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:[Samba] Joining Domain Good Day, I downloaded samba-2.2.9, installed and configuted it on a Solaris 5.7 system. I have configured it as a PDC, however whenever i try to join the domain i have created, Windows ask that i enter a username and password authorized to join systems to the domain. Normally with a Windows 2000 server entering the administrators username and password will do it, however I get this error message: The following error occured attempting to join the domain sambadomain.net: Logon failure:unknown user name or bad password. How can i correct this error. If you try to use Administrator for joining machine to domain you should have a User Administrator on Unix-side with uid=0. And don't forget to add Administrator to smbpasswd if you use this file as backend. Then it should work. Thanks for your anticipated co-operation No problem. Christian --- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Clients loose connection
Hi there, I set up a Samba 3. Server on a SUSE 9.1 box, working as a PDC. There are Win9X and Win2K Clients connecting to the server. At a certain time (has been at 1 to 48 hours of uptime), the clients loose connection to the server. At this point, it is not possible to log into the server on a new terminal window, but running processes are still running and reacting. I disconnected the server from the network to see, if some odd traffic is causing the problem - but no change in bahavior. tcpdump shows also nothing striking. top -i shows 25 entries with smbd: 6065 root 0 8980 3296 7468 D 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 smbd ... 6078 root 0 8980 3296 7468 D 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 smbd 24 times with user root and one time with an other user (the one who mentioned the disconnection first) all the entries were looking like shown above. At this point, I can end top and tcpdump but halt shows no reaction... So I have to reboot the server by cuting the power-cord... I already changed the NIC in the server (from Realtek to 3Com) and did the same at one of the clients. After dooing so, the system was running fine for a longer time, but finaly failed also. Any ideas? Thanks Dirk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Joining Linux to Windows 2000 domain
Hi Tim You might not see the e2efileserver there because you are not running netbios - this is easy to check, just type `/etc/init.d/nmb start`. This will start the netbios daemon and you should then be able to get to your server from windows explorer by \\e2efileserver. You will also need to make sure all those services start when the server reboots (hopefully not too often!), im not too sure how fedora gives a gui to your services, but from a console this should work: `chkconfig --level 35 smb on` repeat this for nmb and winbind (swap nmb etc for smb) - this will make samba winbind and nmb start when the server switches to runlevel 3 or 5 (by default you will be starting in runlevel 5). Since you will be running e2efileserver as a domain member, I think it would be a good idea to also make sure it does not try to win browser elections (i may be wrong, but i saw some strange things happening when my server started trying) you can do this by adding: local master = no and preferred master = no to your smb.conf Hopefully that should give you all you need to run ;) H Tim Barone wrote: Hamish, thanks so much for getting back to me! I made sure to follow all of your suggestions. Also, I made a few changes to smb.conf and now wbinfo -u gives me a list of users and wbinfo -g gives me a list of groups. Making some progress!!! I made the following changes to smb.conf: security = ads When I go to a Windows machine and view the entire network, I do not see an e2efileserver icon (e2efileserver is my Linux box). Any further ideas on what I can do Tim From: Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tim Barone [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Joining Linux to Windows 2000 domain Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:42:18 +0100 Make sure winbind is running (have you edited nsswitch.conf to include winbind?) and that nscd is not running. You can stop nscd and restart all the samba services with `/etc/init.d/nscd stop` then `/etc/init.d/smb restart` `/etc/init.d/nmb restart` `/etc/init.d/winbind restart` Hope this helps Tim Barone wrote: Hello, I am new to Linux, Samba, and actually servers in general. I am attempting to set up a Linux file server and join it to a Windows 2000 domain. All I want to be able to do is get files from the linux file server and put files on it. I do not want it to be the domain controller. I join the domain using: net join -S 10.10.10.40 -UAdministrator%password It tells me that I have joined the domain. wbinfo -t wbinfo -p work fine! Wbinfo -u gives me: Error looking up domain members Wbinfo -g gives me: Error looking up domain groups Any ideas on what to do? Thanks a bunch! Linux is Fedora Core 1 Samba is 3.0 smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = EIIECOMM netbios name = e2efileserver1 realm = EIIECOMM.COM idmap uid = 1 - 15000 idmap gid = 1 - 15000 winbind separator = + winbind use default domain = Yes use sendfile = Yes server string= Samba Server printcap anme = /etc/printer load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 security = domain password server = * socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = no os level = 33 wins support = no wins server = 10.10.10.40 (I'm not sure this is a wins server) dns proxy = no [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S browseable = yes writeable = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp writeable = yes guest ok = yes [public] comment = Data path = /export/public public = yes writeable = yes _ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ Overwhelmed by debt? Find out how to Dig Yourself Out of Debt from MSN Money. http://special.msn.com/money/0407debt.armx -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] move samba file and print shares
Hello, Am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2004 15:47 schrieb Hamish: Hello all Is this possible?: samba3.0.3pre2 running as domain member with winbind, acls on reiser providing file security this is all on a seperate disk mounted as 'data1' you have to check, if your ReiserFS implementation supports ACL Could I take this disk, put it in a new box, mount it again as data1, then copy the old smb.conf over to the new box? (I would also join the domain with the same name as the old box) 1.) My proposal is only a suggestion with no working waranty :-), maybe another will post the right way 2.) if you use LDAP for you id mapping, it should work, you also have to transfer the winbind tdb(s) (should be located in /var/lib/samba/ to the new box. Maybe it's better to transfer the whole directory (/var/lib/samba) and also the security tdb(s), located elsewhere (distribution dependent), then its not nescessary to join the domain again, then you have all your printer default settings, drivers, and so on. regards odi Thanks in advance, H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] XP does not join domain
hi, i've the following problem: i want a XP pro sp1 to join my samba (3.0.5) domain (MHC). with my first try it complained that it could not resolve: _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.MHC i've fixed this with the following DNS setup: -- _ldap._tcp.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 389 server.MHC. _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 389 server.MHC. _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 389 server.MHC. _ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 3268 server.MHC. _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.gc._msdcs.MHC.600 IN SRV 0 100 3268 server.MHC. gc._msdcs.MHC. 600 IN A 192.168.100.100 _kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 88 server.MHC. _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.MHC.600 IN SRV 0 100 88 server.MHC. _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 389 server.MHC. _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.MHC.600 IN SRV 0 100 389 server.MHC. _kerberos._tcp.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 88 server.MHC. _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 88 server.MHC. _gc._tcp.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 3268 server.MHC. _gc._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.MHC.600 IN SRV 0 100 3268 server.MHC. _kerberos._udp.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 88 server.MHC. _kpasswd._tcp.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 464 server.MHC. _kpasswd._udp.MHC. 600 IN SRV 0 100 464 server.MHC. MHC. 600 IN A 192.168.100.100 -- i do not use ldap or kerberos by now. i've apllied the XP reg patches. now, i get the following (german, sorry) message: -- Hinweis: Diese Informationen sind für einen Netzwerkadministrator bestimmt. Wenden Sie sich an den Netzwerkadministrator, wenn Sie kein Netzwerkadministrator sind, und leiten Sie die Informationen in der Datei C:\WINDOWS\debug\dcdiag.txt weiter. Der Domänenname MHC ist möglicherweise ein NetBIOS-Domänenname. Sollte dies der Fall sein, stellen Sie sicher, dass der Name bei WINS registriert ist. Wenn Sie sicher sind, dass es sich nicht um einen NetBIOS-Domänennamen handelt, können folgende Information bei der Fehlersuche in der DNS-Konfiguration behilflich sein: Die DNS-Abfrage über den Ressourceneintrag der Dienstidentifizierung (SRV), der zur Suche eines Domänencontrollers für die Domäne MHC verwendet wird, wurde ordnungsgemäß abgeschlossen: Die Abfrage war für den SRV-Eintrag für _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.MHC Die folgenden Domänencontroller wurde von der Abfrage identifiziert: server.mhc Die häufigsten Ursachen dieses Fehlers sind: - Host (A)-Einträge, die den Namen des Domänencontroller dessen IP-Adressen zuordnen, fehlen oder enthalten nicht die richtigen Adressen. - Die in DNS registrierten Domänencontroller verfügen nicht über eine Netzwerkverbindung oder werden nicht ausgeführt. Klicken Sie auf Hilfe, um weitere Informationen über die Fehlerbehebung zu erhalten. -- server.mhc IS resolvable. even from this XP. i've started a tcpdump on the samba server. and while i try to join the domain i do not see a single packate origination form the XP machine. due to this here are no samba log's. it even does not try to connect to the samba server. there is no firewall etc. installed on the XP. when i do local auth and the try to connect to samba every thing works as expected. any suggestions ? TIA matthias -- Matthias Henze[EMAIL PROTECTED] Use PGP!! http://www.mhcsoftware.de/MatthiasHenze.asc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MHC SoftWare GmbH voice: +49-(0)9533-92006-0 Fichtera 17 fax: +49-(0)9533-92006-6 96274 Itzgrund/Germanye-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - pgpEZyUwuCv9g.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Solution?: Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11
well -- after MUCH messing about, and traipsing through the source code, and traversing through the configure scripts -- and tracking down libraries and library dependencies -- and header files... (you get the general idea here) -- rebuild a server to test a theory, and it appears to hold true -- if you install the 'regular' Operating Environment Component, there are actually libraries around that are totally botched and messed up -- all kinds of flaws in them... swlist HPUX11i-OE will tell you if you have this configuration -- if it comes back with information, that's what you have installed, and you're kinda up a tree... IF, however, you installed the HP-UX Technical Computing OE Component (HPUX11i-TCOE) those libraries are fixed -- and you are able to configure, make, and make install HP with no problems... (until you try to access the IPC$ share on the HP host with a Mac OS X system, then you get problems, but you can map directly to the specific share without any problems at all.. go figure) -- SO -- if you can get your hands on a TCOE system, you can run 'configure --disable-shared --enable-statid' and then you can port your /usr/local/samba directory around to the various other servers -- it appears to be stable thus far, and I'm just gonna keep my fingers crossed no -- I don't have any clue how you get from OE to TCOE without re-installing -- sorry for that one... later all! toph -- Forwarded message -- From: topher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:32:25 -0400 Subject: Fwd: Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] got a couple of requests for further information -- so here's an update: yes, I've done the configure and make as root and as a regular user, things die with either compiler in the same place I'm afraid yes, I've run 'autoconf' before running configure, and the only difference I've seen is that the errors during configure get more 'stuff' wrapped around them to make them more apparent... the errors in the log are the same -- here is the exact error message I get during make using gcc: Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:109, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: error: parse error before sendfile /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: error: parse error before bsize_t /usr/include/sys/socket.h:486: error: parse error before sendpath /usr/include/sys/socket.h:486: error: parse error before bsize_t /usr/include/sys/socket.h:493: error: parse error before sendfile64 /usr/include/sys/socket.h:493: error: parse error before bsize64_t /usr/include/sys/socket.h:495: error: parse error before sendpath64 /usr/include/sys/socket.h:495: error: parse error before bsize64_t In file included from /usr/include/sys/mp.h:55, from /usr/include/sys/malloc.h:59, from /usr/include/net/netmp.h:53, from /usr/include/net/if.h:59, from include/includes.h:275, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/machine/sys/setjmp.h:45: error: redefinition of `struct label_t' In file included from dynconfig.c:21: include/includes.h:495: error: conflicting types for `socklen_t' /usr/include/sys/socket.h:199: error: previous declaration of `socklen_t' make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 any other thoughts/suggestions are appreciated and MORE than welcome! toph -- Forwarded message -- From: topher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:32:06 -0400 Subject: Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] First -- to avoid the common answers to the 'building on HP-UX' questions that seem to be available on the list and the web: 1) using the depot from the Porting Center won't work, it's well downrev of 3.0.5 and I need to get the new security fixes (so that the security team will go back into it's dark dank den and fear not for the security of our environment) 2) samba.org only has a 3.0.4a binary package for HP-UX -- so again, no security fixes as such, I'm trying to build 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11 -- and I'm running into the same problem I pretty much always seem to run into: if I use gcc (gcc 3.3.2 off the porting center), configure runs through with several errors that look like: configure: WARNING: foo/bar.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: foo/bar.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: foo/bar.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result where foo and bar are any of about a dozen different headers... I suspect that if I could find a solution to this one, then I'd be able to get somewhere -- the configure.log shows that the problem with the headers is: configure:9644: gcc -c -O -D_HPUX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_ALIGNMENT_REQUIRED=1 -D_MAX_ALIGNMENT=4 -DMAX_POSITIVE_LOCK_OFFSET=0x1ff LL conftest.c 5 In file included from configure:9622: /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: error: parse error before sendfile
[Samba] realm not recognised?
Hi, I've installed Samba 3.0.2a and attempting to configure in security = ads mode but at startup smbd and nmbd complain that the realm (that defines the AD realm) parameter is unkown. Has anyone seen and overcome this before ? [2004/07/29 15:59:05, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2410) Unknown parameter encountered: realm [2004/07/29 15:59:05, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(3048) Ignoring unknown parameter realm Thanks, Bob. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot login to PDC(FreeBSD boxen) from client(win XP)
Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 11:08, Chris E wrote: I'm finally getting somewhere in setting up my FreeBSD PDC. I try and login via my XP client and now it gives me this odd message. Cannot login because a duplicate user already exists on the network. Please goto control panel and system and change your computer name. Sorta paraphrased there, perhaps off by a word or two but that's pretty much what it tells me. I'm just using system users and smbpasswd for setting up users. Not sure what other info may be needed. The following is my smb.conf and my logs. I'm new to Samba and windows networking in general so go easy. =) Thanks in advance. --- basic network rule = each computer must have a different name. Windows XP - Start - Settings - Control Panel - System Computer Name (tab) - Change Name (pick something unique) Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 01:12, Chris E wrote: I'm well aware of that. I didn't say new to networking, just windows networking. :)) They both have different names and there are only two pc's, the PDC and the XP client. I've changed the XP machines name repeatedly and rebooted each time as the machine requests and it still doesn't work. I only wish it was easy as the error says. Thanks for your reply though! OK but I try to believe in the accuracy of the messages. Is it possible that you joined this WinXP system to the domain with a different name? If so, can you delete the computer account in the unix passwd and samba passdb? Then rejoin with the current unique name. If you have never joined the computer to the domain, check /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts to make sure that things are adequately represented. You also might want to stop samba, delete wins.dat and restart samba. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] need some advice
Matthias, I have not read your thread about your problems at all. I need the list of stuff I wanted. Yes there is a size limit, But we don't NEED 10,000 lines of the log, just the pertinent stuff. Along the lines of don't use Win98, I'd have to agree. But, then again, that probably is not doable in your case. Please let me be the first to say sorry for no responses. I tend to help those that help themselves or the one that have demonstrated at least some persistence. And, don't think that I haven't gone through the same here. I was really frustrated with an ADS/WindowsNT/2K/2K3/Samba/Applications Server/shell access/e-mail setup recently... I'd have thank nobody for replying as well on 2 separate events. BUT, to go back to your stuff, The stuff I listed is what I need to continue to help you, and maybe others will share the secrets they have found. So, go back to my first one just before this on... and answer those questions, if need be multiple mails to overcome the size limit. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] net ads join fails with Operations error ?
Hi all. I'm having a problem joining an ADS domain with Samba 3.0.5. The machine account has been set up on the server in a similar way to another system which has joined successfully. The error I'm getting is kinda vague, and I have no idea what it means: --- [2004/07/28 16:32:36, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(211) got [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004/07/28 16:32:36, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(306) krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found) [2004/07/28 16:32:36, 3] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_cleanup_expired_creds(245) Ticket in ccache[MEMORY:net_ads] expiration Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:32:36 GMT ads_join_realm: Operations error [2004/07/28 16:32:36, 2] utils/net.c:main(792) return code = -1 --- Does anybody know what Operations error actually means? What have I configured incorrectly? The command I'm running is: # net -d 3 ads join UAT/WISE/Servers -U kimjeo ..and my config looks like this: security = ADS netbios name = SAMBA3DWEB workgroup = xxx realm = xxx.xxx.xx.xxx name resolve order = lmhosts host wins wins server = 10.xx.xx.xx winbind separator = + winbind uid = 65534-65534 winbind gid = 65534-65534 winbind enum users = no winbind enum groups = no winbind cache time = 60 password server = * Any help or advice is appreciated. Regards, Tim. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What is the domain name when using Samba as PDC
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:17:31AM +1000, Clement wrote: The following error occured attempting to join the domain SAMBA: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. The user clement and the machine user clement$ were both manually created. The log.smbd also showed the password was authenticated. Do you have any suggestion about the trouble? Am I right to believe that the machine user clement$ is the (NetBIOS) name of the computer you want to join to the domain? Also, have you done an # smbpasswd -a root on the PDC machine? Because you cannot use a regular user such as (I believe) clement to add the machine to the domain, it needs to be a Samba root user (or a user with Samba-root privileges, although I have experienced problems with that, but didn't investigate them). So after doing the # smbpasswd -a root and giving it a password (preferrably not the same as the Unix root user) you should try again to join the computer to the domain, this time using root as username (and the Samba password you just gave) in the dialog box on the client machine. I found this how-to quite useful, maybe it can help you: http://www.linuxhelp.ca/forums/index.php?act=STf=3t=3823 Your smb.conf looks quite reasonable, didn't find anything wrong in there. HTH -- Andreas daff Ntaflos | A cynic is a man who knows the price of daff AT dword DOT org | everything, and the value of nothing. Vienna, AUSTRIA| Oscar Wilde -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help me with Samba
Hello! I am from Russia. Sorry for my English. I need help. Please, tell me how I must configure Samba and FreeBSD 5.1 for use with ACL. We have small network (30 PCs) and PDC on Samba 3.0.4 (last version from http://samba.org http://samba.org/ ). Thanks for help. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
havent done that , but should work Hamish schrieb: Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help me with Samba
Hi, which acl do you mean filesystem acls , or network acls? Regards shut schrieb: Hello! I am from Russia. Sorry for my English. I need help. Please, tell me how I must configure Samba and FreeBSD 5.1 for use with ACL. We have small network (30 PCs) and PDC on Samba 3.0.4 (last version from http://samba.org http://samba.org/ ). Thanks for help. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba runs 1 month and then crash and never come back
guys need help my samba was working fine for about 1 month then it stoped working and now i get this error log [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 5] printing/print_cups.c:cups_printer_fn(93) cups_printer_fn(0x807d4b2) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2397) adding printer service Deskjet692c [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2397) adding printer service DeskJet870 [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2397) adding printer service laserjet [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.0.254 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=10.0.0.254 bcast=10.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0 [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 5] lib/hash.c:hash_table_init(67) Hash size = 521. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 5] lib/util.c:init_names(270) Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]=ACTION [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(787) loaded services [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(802) Becoming a daemon. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:process_exists(1259) PANIC: assert failed at lib/util.c(1259) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: assert failed [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 8 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #6 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41] [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 26661 (3.0.5) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: internal error [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d0e] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d75] #4 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40200078] #5 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x178) [0x402015a8] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81da786] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #12 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41 my smb.conf [global] load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 09:34, Hamish wrote: Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. --- that is what I would do if it were me Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba runs 1 month and then crash and never come back
guys need help my samba was working fine for about 1 month then it stoped working and now i get this error log [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:53, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74) Substituting charset 'ISO-8859-1' for LOCALE [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 5] printing/print_cups.c:cups_printer_fn(93) cups_printer_fn(0x807d4b2) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2397) adding printer service Deskjet692c [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2397) adding printer service DeskJet870 [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2397) adding printer service laserjet [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.0.254 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=10.0.0.254 bcast=10.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0 [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 5] lib/hash.c:hash_table_init(67) Hash size = 521. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 5] lib/util.c:init_names(270) Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]=ACTION [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(787) loaded services [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(802) Becoming a daemon. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:process_exists(1259) PANIC: assert failed at lib/util.c(1259) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: assert failed [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 8 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #6 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41] [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 26661 (3.0.5) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: internal error [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d0e] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d75] #4 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40200078] #5 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x178) [0x402015a8] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81da786] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #12 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41 my smb.conf [global] load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 admin users
Re: [Samba] 2003 KDC and Samba
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 10:08, Tran Charles A Civ OC-ALC/ITMA wrote: We have serveral RHEL 3.0 Update 2 servers running Samba. These have been working flawlessly for several months.. Recently, the base upgraded all the Windows 2000 servers to Windows 2003.. NOTE: we don't have admin rights to the Domain Controllers.. (wish we did..) Previous to the Domain (and kdc) controllers to 2003 we had no issues joining a new Samba Sever to the ADS.. Using the same krb5.conf and kdc.conf and smb.conf file.. it is no longer possible to join a Samba 3.0 server to the domain.. Any help direction is appreciated.. VR Charles Samba packages - samba-common-3.0.4-6.3E samba-3.0.4-6.3E samba-client-3.0.4-6.3E Kerberos Packages.. - pam_krb5-1.73-1 krb5-libs-1.2.7-24 krb5-workstation-1.2.7-24 krbafs-1.1.1-11 krbafs-utils-1.1.1-11 krb5-server-1.2.7-24 krbafs-devel-1.1.1-11 krb5-devel-1.2.7-24 First off, you need to use MIT kerberos v1.3.x, install it (I had to use source to do this. v1.3.4 works nice. I just left the RHES krb5 stuff inplace. as then it feels just like it was compiled for it. I used a fugly configure line, for kerberos. You will prolly have to do the same for krbafs. I also updated the pam_smb and pam_krb5 packages from Fedora Core (got the src rpm and did a rpmbuild --rebuild on it) Your samba should be okay, but given that 3.0.5 was just release last week Wednesday as a security release... dunno. I had many little problems at MIT krb5 v1.2.7. Why I went to v1.3.4. You might also try the currently broken option called: spnego = Yes It may or may not work. If you want to know the configure options I used... let me know. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] need some advice
On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:03, Greg Folkert wrote: Please let me be the first to say sorry for no responses. I tend to help those that help themselves or the one that have demonstrated at least some persistence. ... And, don't think that I haven't gone through the same here. I was really frustrated with an ADS/WindowsNT/2K/2K3/Samba/Applications Server/shell access/e-mail setup recently... I'd have thank nobody for replying as well on 2 separate events. ... BUT, to go back to your stuff, The stuff I listed is what I need to continue to help you, and maybe others will share the secrets they have found. Greg makes a good point here. Over the years many people have contributed to answering questions on this list. Mostly the same questions come up repetitively. It takes a huge time commitment to answer the requests that are made. Those of us who help out do it for love and for a desire to help others. A major effort has been made over the past 12 months to improve Samba documentation. The product of that is a vastly updated Samba-HOWTO-Collection that has been published as The Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide, as well as the Samba-Guide that has been published as Samba-3 by Example. Both books are available from Amazon.Com, or can be freely downloaded from: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/ The Samba-HOWTO-Collection documents the nuts and bolts of how to use particular features built into Samba. This is principally a technical reference document. The solutions it contains for the most part cover only part of a total solution. The Samba-Guide documents complete network solutions. Each chapter documents a networking problem, discusses vital aspects of the proposed solution and then provides a prescriptive guide that begins with a freshly installed Linux system and then takes the installer through every minute step to deliver a fully working solution. This book covers the spectrum from small to very large networks. Both books are part of the official Samba documentation project. This means that if you find deficiencies and contribute your solutions or fixes they can be incorporated so that the next user does not have to go through the same pain and agony you did. Where people demonstrate that they have done their homework, have read the documentation we provide, and still have a problem I will break ice to help them - particularly if in return they will provide an update to either book. Please be mindful when asking for help that by explaining your problem on this list your goal should be to help some else by way of having your problem solved. This is after all a community help list. I welcome direct, personal, email that points me to information in the above books that is either missing, in error, or mis-guided. We want to improve the documentation so it will help everyone. All contributions by way of patches to the documentation will be given attribution in the book. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Samba-Team Member Author: The Official Samba-3 HOWTO Reference Guide, ISBN: 0131453556 Samba-3 by Example, ISBN: 0131472216 Hardening Linux, ISBN: 0072254971 OpenLDAP by Example, ISBN: 0131488732 Other books in production. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] file server using ldap
I have a pdc set up using ldap and everything works great. All it does is is authenticate user for a lab environment. I have also set up another samba server to just act as a file server for users home directories. Everything works fine but I see errors in my logs. I have security = user. I see that it keeps trying to add itself to ldap as a sambaDomainName. I know that it cant add it because I didnt give that system access to add anything to ldap. My question is that why it trying to add itself as a domain. I dont want it to be a domain. I dont think I'm understanding it correctly. Could someone give me quick 123 on what you would do to set my configuration up. All I want this system to do is act like a file server while getting its info from ldap. Do I need to do setlocalsid on this system? Maybe that would solve it. Thanks in advance!! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba runs 1 month and then crash and never come back
James, Did you update glibc by any chance? Have you rebooted the system and does it still happen following a reboot? What version of Samba is this? - John T. On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:44, James Coggan wrote: guys need help my samba was working fine for about 1 month then it stoped working and now i get this error log ... [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(787) loaded services [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(802) Becoming a daemon. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:process_exists(1259) PANIC: assert failed at lib/util.c(1259) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: assert failed [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 8 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #6 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41] [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 26661 (3.0.5) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: internal error [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d0e] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d75] #4 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40200078] #5 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x178) [0x402015a8] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81da786] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #12 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41 my smb.conf [global] load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 admin users = @domain_admins logon drive = H: domain master = Yes encrypt passwords = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/smbpasswd -U %u smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd logon home = \\action\%u printer admin = @domain_admins wins support = yes netbios name = ACTION printing = cups printcap name = cups logon script = LOGIN.BAT default = global # dos charset = 850 unix password sync = yes workgroup = COGGAN logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U os level = 99 preferred master = yes local master = yes security = user # unix charset = ISO8859-1 domain logons = Yes log level = 5 passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* passwd chat debug = Yes time server = yes server string = Samba %v as PDC add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g 106 -d /dev/null -s /bin/False %u [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon write list = @domain_admins [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [profiles] path = /home/profile browsable = no writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [public] path = /home/pub read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @users @domain_admins [backup] path = /backup read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @users @domain_admins [alquest] path = /home/alquest read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @domain_admins #[downloads] # path = /home/downloads # read only = No # create mask = 0777 # directory mask = 0777 # valid users = @users @domain_admins # write list = @users @domain_admins [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printer admin = root, administrator, jcoggan valid users = @users
Re: [Samba] file server using ldap
The file server has to have security = domain or security = server; You can read about differences (domain, server) on security in 'smb.conf'. if you use security = domain, You will join the files server in domain. u. Il gio, 2004-07-29 alle 19:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I have a pdc set up using ldap and everything works great. All it does is is authenticate user for a lab environment. I have also set up another samba server to just act as a file server for users home directories. Everything works fine but I see errors in my logs. I have security = user. I see that it keeps trying to add itself to ldap as a sambaDomainName. I know that it cant add it because I didnt give that system access to add anything to ldap. My question is that why it trying to add itself as a domain. I dont want it to be a domain. I dont think I'm understanding it correctly. Could someone give me quick 123 on what you would do to set my configuration up. All I want this system to do is act like a file server while getting its info from ldap. Do I need to do setlocalsid on this system? Maybe that would solve it. Thanks in advance!! ___ Umberto Zanatta linuxDidattica tel: +39 (335) 54 71 385 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://linuxdidattica.org ___ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Profiles and login
Hi. I'm new to samba, so I need some suggestions about its configuration. This is my situation: mit kerberos 5, openldap, openafs. On linux clients, they authenticate over the KDCs, mount /afs file system, get informations about their home directory with ldap. Users have a predefined pattern for their homes, depending on the first letter: for a user name ``smith'' /afs/cell.name/usr/s/smith/ I'd like to make a domain, having also windows clients log on the remote server. This means that ``\Users and Settings\smith'' should be the UNC ``\\AFS\cell.name\usr\smith'', otherwise, I can map a global afs drive, like Z: pointig to \\AFS\cell.name, but the initial letter issue still remains. Can you give me some hints about your opinions? How would you do this? What kind of ``security'' would you turn on? -- Senseimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icqnum:241572242 msn-id:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Backup from M$ SQL to samba box
Hi everyone, I am new to here. I am trying to backup my SQL server to a home made samba box, but it comes up to me that the backup speed drop sigificantly when the backup arrives at 48GB and eventuallly die out after that. I am just thinking if I am having problem with samba. My box configuration Redhat Fedora Core 2 Kernel 2.6.5-1.358 samba-3.0.3-5 Adaptec 2410SA Controller 4 x 250 GB Harddisk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Migrating from NT4 causes profiles not to load
I'm migrating from an NT4 Domain Controller to Samba 3.0.5 And it's mostly working. Users can log on but their desktop profiles don't load. On the NT Server there profile location was just left blank and people had their profiles locally saved. With the new samba server I want to leave it the same for now. The howto says A question often asked is: How may I enforce use of local profiles? or How do I disable roaming profiles? There are three ways of doing this: In smb.conf Affect the following settings and ALL clients will be forced to use a local profile: logon home = and logon path = The arguments to these parameters must be left blank. It is necessary to include the = sign to specifically assign the empty value. So I did but when I tested it out, it just gave users a default profile. All SID should have remained the same when they were vampired. In the LDAP database I browsed through it and there are no entries like sambaProfilePath for anyone so I just assumed it would default to smb.conf settings. The only samba attributes in LDAP for each users are: sambaSID, sambaPwdMustChange, sambaPwdLastSet, sambaPwdCanChange, sambaPrimaryGroupSID, sambaNTPassword, sambaLogonTime, sambaLogoffTime, sambaLMPassword, sambaDomainName, sambaAcctFlags I'd perfer an option that doesn't require changing settings on each workstation. ===smb.conf=== # Global parameters MANA (PDC SETUP) [global] workgroup = OFFICE # PDC = Yes, BDC = No domain master = Yes domain logons = Yes os level = 39 preferred master = Auto netbios name = MANA server string = Samba Domain Controller on %L passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 250 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 passwd program = smbpasswd %u encrypt passwords = yes #Regular LDAP Tools add user script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -a -m '%u' delete user script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl %u add group script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-groupadd.pl '%g' delete group script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-groupdel.pl '%g' add user to group script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '%u' '%g' delete user from group script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -x '%u' '%g' set primary group script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-usermod.pl -g '%g' '%u' add machine script = /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w '%u' ldap suffix = o=office ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap ldap admin dn = cn=samba,ou=DSA,o=office ldap ssl = no ldap passwd sync = Yes message command = /bin/mail -s 'message from %f on %m' root %s; rm %s idmap uid = 15000-2 idmap gid = 15000-2 admin users = root #profile acls = Yes printing = cups logon home = logon path = ## Shares Start Below ## [homes] comment = Home Directories /smbhomes/%u path = /smbhomes/%u read only = No browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /smbnetlogon admin users = root guest ok = Yes browseable = No #[Profiles] # comment = Roaming Profile Share # path = /smbhomes/%u # read only = No # #inherit permissions = Yes # #inherit acls = Yes # browseable = No # [printers] comment = All Printers printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes public = yes read only = Yes writable = no -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] need some advice
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 12:59, John H Terpstra wrote: On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:03, Greg Folkert wrote: Please let me be the first to say sorry for no responses. I tend to help those that help themselves or the one that have demonstrated at least some persistence. ... And, don't think that I haven't gone through the same here. I was really frustrated with an ADS/WindowsNT/2K/2K3/Samba/Applications Server/shell access/e-mail setup recently... I'd have thank nobody for replying as well on 2 separate events. ... [...] Greg makes a good point here. Over the years many people have contributed to answering questions on this list. Mostly the same questions come up repetitively. It takes a huge time commitment to answer the requests that are made. Those of us who help out do it for love and for a desire to help others. [...] Where people demonstrate that they have done their homework, have read the documentation we provide, and still have a problem I will break ice to help them - particularly if in return they will provide an update to either book. Please be mindful when asking for help that by explaining your problem on this list your goal should be to help some else by way of having your problem solved. This is after all a community help list. I welcome direct, personal, email that points me to information in the above books that is either missing, in error, or mis-guided. We want to improve the documentation so it will help everyone. All contributions by way of patches to the documentation will be given attribution in the book. [...] John, since I was a consultant on that Gig I (am still finishing) am charged with Complete Documentation of what I did. This is a good thing. I'll have to include my samba.install.journal, Each and everything I did and referenced to make RH-ES 3.0 SP2 running 2.4.21-smp-HUGEMEMetc. to operate in a Completely mixed NT/2K/2K3/Linux/s390/(Win*NIX)ApplicationServer/Solaris/kerberos5/ADS/KitchenSink environment. (Thank $DEITY it didn't include NIS/NIS+) Now, the good thing is I'll have everything *I* did to get things to work, including configure options, references that helped out to glue all the pieces together, versions of software used, compiler used, CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS, winbind setup, joining ADS, setting KRB5 proper for 6 KDCs, 2 InterTree TransSumpthing trust and 5 domain in the tree trusts, with ACLs being used on the Linux machine (a quad 248 Opteron HP system with 10GB of Memory and 40+TB of Disk), bad thing is, it'll have to be sanitized, and proof read before I can release it. It basically turned out to be a single-Sign-on setup with ADS and kerberos5 doing the auth work. With machine key.tabs and group mappings from H3LL!. But, then again, maybe my pain will finally lessen others pain. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] need some advice
On Thursday 29 July 2004 06:16, Greg Folkert wrote: Otherwise, you will only get a generic response. *IF* someone can get their arms around you problem, they may post a few fixes that may or may not work. This is the way of this list, we are not GODS (well except Jerry, John and Gerald (plus a few others on the samba team)) Last time I checked the deity logs there was no record of my name. ;) - John T. -- John H Terpstra Samba-Team Member Phone: +1 (650) 580-8668 Author: The Official Samba-3 HOWTO Reference Guide, ISBN: 0131453556 Samba-3 by Example, ISBN: 0131472216 Hardening Linux, ISBN: 0072254971 OpenLDAP by Example, ISBN: 0131488732 Other books in production. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2003 KDC and Samba
On Thursday 29 July 2004 08:08, Tran Charles A Civ OC-ALC/ITMA wrote:
We have serveral RHEL 3.0 Update 2 servers running Samba.
These have been working flawlessly for several months..
Recently, the base upgraded all the Windows 2000 servers
to Windows 2003..
Only MIT Kerberos 1.3.1 or later will work with Windows 2003 Server ADS.
- John T.
NOTE: we don't have admin rights to the Domain Controllers.. (wish we
did..)
Previous to the Domain (and kdc) controllers to 2003 we had
no issues joining a new Samba Sever to the ADS..
Using the same krb5.conf and kdc.conf and smb.conf file.. it
is no longer possible to join a Samba 3.0 server to the domain..
Any help direction is appreciated..
VR
Charles
Samba packages
-
samba-common-3.0.4-6.3E
samba-3.0.4-6.3E
samba-client-3.0.4-6.3E
Kerberos Packages..
-
pam_krb5-1.73-1
krb5-libs-1.2.7-24
krb5-workstation-1.2.7-24
krbafs-1.1.1-11
krbafs-utils-1.1.1-11
krb5-server-1.2.7-24
krbafs-devel-1.1.1-11
krb5-devel-1.2.7-24
Things tried..(per the samba docs. this is the first step..)
kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
error..
kinit(v5): KRB5 error code 52 while getting initial credentials
net ads join /IT/Computers/Servers-2 -U adminOFthisOU
error..
kerberos_kinit_password [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed: KRB5
error code 52
Not much on google about this error..
krb5.conf
**
logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
ticket_lifetime = 24000
default_realm = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
# default_tgs_enctypes = rc4-hmac
# default_tkt_enctypes = rc4-hmac
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = false
[realms]
USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL = {
kdc = xxx.xxx.xxx.241:88
admin_server = xxx.xxx.xxx.241:749
default_domain = usaf.af.mil
}
[domain_realm]
.usaf.af.mil = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
usaf.af.mil = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
[kdc]
profile = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kdc.conf
[appdefaults]
pam = {
debug = false
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = false
*
kdc.conf
*
[kdcdefaults]
acl_file = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kadm5.acl
dict_file = /usr/share/dict/words
admin_keytab = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kadm5.keytab
v4_mode = nopreauth
[realms]
USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL = {
master_key_type = des-cbc-crc
supported_enctypes = des3-cbc-sha1:normal des3-cbc-sha1:norealm
des3-cbc-sha1:onlyrealm des-cbc-crc:v4 des-cbc-crc:afs3 des-cbc-crc:normal
des-cbc-crc:norealm des-cbc-crc:onlyrealm des-cbc-md4:v4 des-cbc-md4:afs3
des-cbc-md4:normal des-cbc-md4:norealm des-cbc-md4:onlyrealm des-cbc-md5:v4
des-cbc-md5:afs3 des-cbc-md5:normal des-cbc-md5:norealm
des-cbc-md5:onlyrealm des-cbc-sha1:v4 des-cbc-sha1:afs3 des-cbc-sha1:normal
des-cbc-sha1:norealm des-cbc-sha1:onlyrealm
}
*
smb.conf
*[global]
workgroup = USAF-2K
realm = USAF.AFMC.DS.AF.MIL
server string =
security = ADS
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = xxx.xxx.xxx.241
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 0
announce version = 5.0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 10.50.1.52
ldap ssl = no
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
template shell = /bin/bash
# winbind separator = +
# valid users = @oracle
printing = cups
[testshare]
comment = System Share
path = /home2/share
force group = share
writeable = yes
case sensitive = Yes
hide dot files = No
--
John H Terpstra
Samba-Team Member
Phone: +1 (650) 580-8668
Author:
The Official Samba-3 HOWTO Reference Guide, ISBN: 0131453556
Samba-3 by Example, ISBN: 0131472216
Hardening Linux, ISBN: 0072254971
OpenLDAP by Example, ISBN: 0131488732
Other books in production.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba runs 1 month and then crash and never come back
rebuild??? John H Terpstra wrote: On Thursday 29 July 2004 11:22, you wrote: Nope, no one touched the machine in 2 days I'm trying the reboot but then what? is it a bug??? I'm using 3.0.5 version Could it be possible that you have updated or patched glibc recently? What is your OS? How is it updated? Did you build the Samba installation or did you obtain it from elsewhere? - John T. John H Terpstra wrote: James, Did you update glibc by any chance? Have you rebooted the system and does it still happen following a reboot? What version of Samba is this? - John T. On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:44, James Coggan wrote: guys need help my samba was working fine for about 1 month then it stoped working and now i get this error log ... [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(787) loaded services [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(802) Becoming a daemon. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:process_exists(1259) PANIC: assert failed at lib/util.c(1259) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: assert failed [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 8 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #6 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41] [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 26661 (3.0.5) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: internal error [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d0e] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d75] #4 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40200078] #5 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x178) [0x402015a8] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81da786] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #12 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41 my smb.conf [global] load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 admin users = @domain_admins logon drive = H: domain master = Yes encrypt passwords = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/smbpasswd -U %u smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd logon home = \\action\%u printer admin = @domain_admins wins support = yes netbios name = ACTION printing = cups printcap name = cups logon script = LOGIN.BAT default = global # dos charset = 850 unix password sync = yes workgroup = COGGAN logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U os level = 99 preferred master = yes local master = yes security = user # unix charset = ISO8859-1 domain logons = Yes log level = 5 passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* passwd chat debug = Yes time server = yes server string = Samba %v as PDC add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g 106 -d /dev/null -s /bin/False %u [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon write list = @domain_admins [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [profiles] path = /home/profile browsable = no writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [public] path = /home/pub read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @users @domain_admins [backup] path = /backup read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @users @domain_admins [alquest] path = /home/alquest read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @domain_admins #[downloads] # path = /home/downloads # read only = No # create mask = 0777 # directory mask = 0777 # valid users = @users @domain_admins # write list = @users @domain_admins [printers] comment = All Printers path =
Re: [Samba] realm not recognised?
Bob, Please email me the output of running: smbd -b - John T. On Thursday 29 July 2004 09:35, Bob Lansley wrote: Hi, I've installed Samba 3.0.2a and attempting to configure in security = ads mode but at startup smbd and nmbd complain that the realm (that defines the AD realm) parameter is unkown. Has anyone seen and overcome this before ? [2004/07/29 15:59:05, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2410) Unknown parameter encountered: realm [2004/07/29 15:59:05, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(3048) Ignoring unknown parameter realm Thanks, Bob. -- John H Terpstra Samba-Team Member Phone: +1 (650) 580-8668 Author: The Official Samba-3 HOWTO Reference Guide, ISBN: 0131453556 Samba-3 by Example, ISBN: 0131472216 Hardening Linux, ISBN: 0072254971 OpenLDAP by Example, ISBN: 0131488732 Other books in production. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.x and high processor utilication caused by /etc/passwd access
Hello together,
since upgrading on samba 3.0.x (issue happens with all 3.0. release) the
cpu-load on my samba PDC ist constantly near 100%. The cpu power ist
consumed by all running smb-processes. Systrace shows me that the smb
processes tried to access to /etc/passwd on a permanent basis. My question
is: Why tries samba to access etc/passwd so often and produces this high
cpu-load?
Regards,
Heiko Böringer
Rights for smbpasswd are set as following
-rw-r--r--1 root root 5540 Jul 27 15:15 passwd
Systemconfiguration
- Debian 3.0 (Woddy)
- Samba with an the samba3.0.5.deb from the unstable tree (but happends
with
all other versions too)
- Configured als PDC with SMBPASSWD Authentification (no windbind, kerberos,
ldap..)
TOP shows the following
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
19094 nobody18 0 3872 3872 3440 R 8.7 0.7 43:22 smbd
5213 nobody18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:43 smbd
9345 nobody17 0 4100 4100 3628 R 8.7 0.7 29:24 smbd
10237 nobody19 0 3772 3772 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:06 smbd
17121 nobody17 0 4140 4140 3632 R 8.7 0.8 28:02 smbd
20776 nobody18 0 3668 3668 3324 R 8.7 0.7 27:48 smbd
17915 nobody18 0 3768 3768 3388 R 8.7 0.7 46:35 smbd
18441 nobody17 0 4128 4128 3640 R 8.5 0.7 45:16 smbd
25605 nobody18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.5 0.7 6:38 smbd
1065 root 16 0 5504 5504 3928 R 7.1 1.0 0:59 smbd
28475 root 9 0 4280 4280 3700 S 0.3 0.8 0:02 smbd
Systrace on one of the smbd processes shows the following:
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 26
connect(26, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path=/var/run/.nscd_socket}, 110) = -1
ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
And here?s the smb.conf
##
[global]
unix charset = ISO8859-1
display charset = ISO8859-1
workgroup = RVMO.DE
server string = %h
obey pam restrictions = Yes
# unix password sync = false
# encrypt passwords = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n
*Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n .
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.5 PANIC
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:18:54AM +0800, Jacky Kim wrote: Hi, all: I am using Samba 3.0.5 with patch at http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.4/. But I found the follow messages in samba log: This may be a bug we have already fixed in the 3.0.6 stream (what was called 3.0.5 before the security release). Can you try one of these pre-releases and see if the problem still occurs ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.x and high processor utilication caused by /etc/passwd access
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 08:18:22PM +0200, Böringer, Heiko wrote:
Hello together,
since upgrading on samba 3.0.x (issue happens with all 3.0. release) the
cpu-load on my samba PDC ist constantly near 100%. The cpu power ist
consumed by all running smb-processes. Systrace shows me that the smb
processes tried to access to /etc/passwd on a permanent basis. My question
is: Why tries samba to access etc/passwd so often and produces this high
cpu-load?
Regards,
Heiko Böringer
Rights for smbpasswd are set as following
-rw-r--r--1 root root 5540 Jul 27 15:15 passwd
Systemconfiguration
- Debian 3.0 (Woddy)
- Samba with an the samba3.0.5.deb from the unstable tree (but happends
with
all other versions too)
- Configured als PDC with SMBPASSWD Authentification (no windbind, kerberos,
ldap..)
TOP shows the following
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
19094 nobody18 0 3872 3872 3440 R 8.7 0.7 43:22 smbd
5213 nobody18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:43 smbd
9345 nobody17 0 4100 4100 3628 R 8.7 0.7 29:24 smbd
10237 nobody19 0 3772 3772 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:06 smbd
17121 nobody17 0 4140 4140 3632 R 8.7 0.8 28:02 smbd
20776 nobody18 0 3668 3668 3324 R 8.7 0.7 27:48 smbd
17915 nobody18 0 3768 3768 3388 R 8.7 0.7 46:35 smbd
18441 nobody17 0 4128 4128 3640 R 8.5 0.7 45:16 smbd
25605 nobody18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.5 0.7 6:38 smbd
1065 root 16 0 5504 5504 3928 R 7.1 1.0 0:59 smbd
28475 root 9 0 4280 4280 3700 S 0.3 0.8 0:02 smbd
Systrace on one of the smbd processes shows the following:
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 26
connect(26, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path=/var/run/.nscd_socket}, 110) = -1
ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)
close(26) = 0
Looks like a nsswitch bug whilst talking to nscd. Turn off
nscd from nsswitch.conf and see if the problem still occurs.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Anyone have Solaris 8/9, W2K AD, NIS working?
Okay, I'm at wit's end, and am about ready to give up on Samba 3.x as a way to implement single sign-on. I would like to know if there's anyone out there who has the following environment: - Solaris 8 and 9, running NIS (not NIS+) for automount and passwd/group maps - W2K-based Active Directory I'm trying to get Solaris authentication to work using AD user accounts. According to The Official Samba 3 Howto and Reference Guide, this should be a simple thing. Well, it is, as long as you don't care that the UNIX userid to SID mapping isn't consistent across NIS clients, which really screws up file ownership. Well, it just isn't working. I've tried the instructions in there, which are laughably inadequate. They don't cover NIS or the SID-userid mapping problem properly. I've searched this mailing list for answers, and haven't found much. I simply cannot get Samba to store the userid mapping in the AD Idmap OU. I'm not going to detail the very large list of things I've been trying for months now, but they include installing Services for Unix on the AD servers, installing OpenLDAP and Kerberos, installing the idmap_ad plugin on my test Solaris box, configuring pam.conf and nsswitch.conf, setting up winbind, oh, the list goes on. If anyone out there is running NIS on their Solaris boxes, and has single sign-on working properly using AD-based authentication, with consistent SID-userid mapping (i.e. a SID gets mapped to the same UNIX userid no matter which Solaris client is used), I'd very much like to talk to that person to find out how they got it working. Anyone? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Anyone have Solaris 8/9, W2K AD, NIS working?
It sounds like you need to pick a network directory service and go with it, I'd suggest LDAP over NIS any day. I have had a solaris (9 I think) box running happily over LDAP and AD2000, although it was just for test. I'm trying to get Solaris authentication to work using AD user accounts. According to The Official Samba 3 Howto and Reference Guide, this should be a simple thing. Well, it is, as long as you don't care that the UNIX userid to SID mapping isn't consistent across NIS clients, which really screws up file ownership. You need a central structure to hold your SID mappings if you're traversing machines, AFAICT, the only network structure supported is LDAP. Well, it just isn't working. I've tried the instructions in there, which are laughably inadequate. They don't cover NIS or the SID-userid mapping problem properly. I've searched this mailing list for answers, and haven't found much. I simply cannot get Samba to store the userid mapping in the AD Idmap OU. Perhaps some expansion on your issues here would help: What kind of errors is samba spitting back What configurations have you done. I'm not going to detail the very large list of things I've been trying for months now, but they include installing Services for Unix on the AD servers, installing OpenLDAP and Kerberos, installing the idmap_ad plugin on my test Solaris box, configuring pam.conf and nsswitch.conf, setting up winbind, oh, the list goes on. If anyone out there is running NIS on their Solaris boxes, and has single sign-on working properly using AD-based authentication, with consistent SID-userid mapping (i.e. a SID gets mapped to the same UNIX userid no matter which Solaris client is used), I'd very much like to talk to that person to find out how they got it working. I'm curious, why the insistance on NIS? Do you have other apps that require it? Are you having problems getting autofs on solaris to talk to LDAP? If so, a guy can short circuit it by making files from the ldap structure, that's what I do. Are you an old school sun guy from way back that can't let go of it? Give in to the dark side of the DIT,... err... I mean use ldap, its better over here... or something, you get my drift hopefully. -- Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Information Systems Consultant Fax:701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Redundancy in samba
I'm in the process of setting up a similar environment, I'm just working at it from the other side. I've got the Samba environment and I'm adding the kerberos/afs to it. Be sure to compile with the --with-afs option. Samba hand crafts AFS tokens on the users behalf, this means maintaining two passwords a samba password and a kerberos password. I'm setting up a synchronization process. Your samba servers will also need access to you AFS server key, use the net command to store the key in the secrets.tdb. In my environment I was going to have two or more samba servers offering access to the same AFS space, and setup the logon script to automatically determine which one to map to. If a samba server goes down then the user will need to logout and back logon or rerun the logon script. Derek On Jul 29, 2004, at 8:47 AM, Sensei wrote: Hi. I'm new to samba, so I don't know many things. I have a big infrastructure based on kerberos, ldap and afs. All our linux clients log nicely on the cell, no problem. The problem is as everywhere... windows. I'm trying to make windows log on the cell, using samba (I will try tomorrow to set up a domain). The questions about samba will come later on, so expect me to bother you :) Now, I have more than one server supplying all the needed services, and I ask you: is it possible to set up more than one pc supplying samba services for the same domain? -- Senseimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icqnum:241572242 msn-id:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Error: Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba I do not believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use -- Galileo Galilei PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot login to PDC(FreeBSD boxen) from client(win XP)
Craig White wrote: OK but I try to believe in the accuracy of the messages. Is it possible that you joined this WinXP system to the domain with a different name? If so, can you delete the computer account in the unix passwd and samba passdb? Then rejoin with the current unique name. If you have never joined the computer to the domain, check /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts to make sure that things are adequately represented. You also might want to stop samba, delete wins.dat and restart samba. Craig I understand. I meant no disrespect in my previous respose. I understand the thouroughness that you want to achieve here. I just wanted to clear up what I had originally said. Anyways, following your latest advice and help from a linux howto I was able to finally join the domain. I was extremely happy when I saw the Welcome to %domain winpopup. I just have a few questions I'd like to clear up so that I know I'm able to recreate the procedure if I were to have to do this over from scratch. Firstly the steps I took to get where I now am. I had first double checked the /etc/hosts file and checked to find a lmhosts file. /etc/hosts was indeed correct and this lmhosts file is nowhere to be found, even now with a successful logon. Is this something I should worry about? Secondly I removed the computer name from /etc/passwd, it was advised to add in, in another howto I had read. It said to do so to create a trust account for the computer but that might be a more advanced security feature and I most likely confused it in with some of the steps I was using to get to a basic setup. Anyways, after removing the trust account I removed the user from both the unix passwd db and the samba passwd db. I then proceded to readd him with adduser and smbpasswd. After that I noticed the following in the howto I was currently reading... 12. Add the root user to the password backend as follows: *smbpasswd -a root* 13. Create the Standard NT-Unix group mappings with the following commands: *net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Admins unixgroup=root net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=users net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Guests unixgroup=nobody* Add any aditional groups with the above command ... the Unix group needs to be added first via *groupadd*. Check that the groups are setup with the command: *net groupmap list | sort* The output should look like this: Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-179504-2437109-488451-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-179504-2437109-488451-514) - nobody Domain Users (S-1-5-21-179504-2437109-488451-513) - users Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 So I read through the step and decided to run the 'net groupmap list | sort' command and noticed the accounts weren't yet mapped. What exactly is the importance of this step? I understand what it does but I'm not exactly sure why. Forgive my blindness. Anyways, I proceeded through step 13. After a bit farther down I believe I found the mistake I've been making this whole time. The following is a snippet... snip, snip *Windows 2000* 1. *Right-click* on the *My Computer icon* on the desktop and select *Properties*. 2. Click the *Network Identification* tab. 3. Click the *Properties* button, as illustrated in this picture http://www.hughesjr.com/images/netID.jpg. 4. Your computer's Computer name must be unique. 5. Pick the *Domain* box and enter *NEWDOM* and press *OK* ... then enter a username (*Administrator*) and password (your *root* user's password on the linux server) that is a member of the Domain Administrators group. See this picture http://www.hughesjr.com/images/netID2.jpg *Windows XP* 1. Go to the *Start menu* and *Right-click* on the *My Computer* icon. Select *Properties*. 2. Click the *Computer Name* tab. 3. Click the *Change* button. Follow the instructions in steps *4* and *5* for *Windows 2000* above. snip Under the win 2k section number 5. enter the username Administrator?? And use the root password. Is this only for the initial connection to the domain? If so why isn't this done with a regular user? Previously I was attempting to use the username/user passwd that I created to match the account the client will be connecting from to connect to the domain, is there a link that someone can provide to clear up why this is done this way? And perhaps explain the pro's/con's. I've been all through the samba docs and on google for days now. Perhaps I've missed the parts that explain this. And to addon what I just said, rather than using Administrator OR administrator (thought to perhaps be case sensitive after first error msg)
Re: [Samba] force create mode issue
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:31:00AM +0200, Zounek, Alex, Patentanwaltskanzlei Zounek wrote: Dear List, I'd like to report my observations on a Samba new file permissions problem for which I found dozens of support requests on the net without any useful replies. Hopefully, my observations help identify the root cause of this issue which also seems to occur with new Samba versions 3.0.x. In our domain we operate a file server under Samba 2.2.8a as PDC. Overall we are delighted with Samba. Many thanks and compliments to the Samba team. There is only one slightly annoying issue with new file permissions. 1. PDC »maestro« hosts 2 Samba shares named »parent« and »child« which are set up as: [parent] path=/home/data/parent writeable=Yes [child] path=/home/data/parent/child browseable=No writeable=Yes oplocks=no level2 oplocks=no create mode = 0770 force create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 2. The Linux permissions on both directories »parent« and »child« are: drwxrwx--- root users i.e. members of the users group have rwx permissions. 3. On our Windows NT and XP client machines we have mapped the »parent« share to network drive X: 4. If user »otto« who is a member of the users group accesses the »child« share via »X:\child« and creates a new file or directory, the new file/directory permissions are set to: -rwxr--r-- otto users or drwxr-xr-x otto users This agrees with the Samba default »create mode 755« but is not not what we expect considering the »create mode« and »force create mode« settings of the »child« share. But it is what we expect via access using the parent share. When access is via one share, settings on other shares are ignored - no matter if they map to the same directory. To behave otherwise would be chaos I'm afraid. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Speed issue with one directory only
I am having a speed issue with Samba and only one folder (/var/www/html) I'm not sure what to try next. I have problems browsing to this folder from WINXP, it seems to hang for about 30 seconds before accessing it. This doesn't happen with any other directories on the box. This directory has a Samba share setup for it, but the speed issue comes up if I use another share and browse to this directory too. Also I have tried browsing to this directory with Webmin's file manager and it also has speed issues, so anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance. Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Solution?: Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11
Even with HP-AnsiC? I don't have this kind of problem. I have been building Samba for years with the HP compilers. There is the occasional snafu (Ying Li's patch does solve the problem however), but it generally works. I don't believe I have this TCOE environment. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, topher wrote: well -- after MUCH messing about, and traipsing through the source code, and traversing through the configure scripts -- and tracking down libraries and library dependencies -- and header files... (you get the general idea here) -- rebuild a server to test a theory, and it appears to hold true -- if you install the 'regular' Operating Environment Component, there are actually libraries around that are totally botched and messed up -- all kinds of flaws in them... swlist HPUX11i-OE will tell you if you have this configuration -- if it comes back with information, that's what you have installed, and you're kinda up a tree... IF, however, you installed the HP-UX Technical Computing OE Component (HPUX11i-TCOE) those libraries are fixed -- and you are able to configure, make, and make install HP with no problems... (until you try to access the IPC$ share on the HP host with a Mac OS X system, then you get problems, but you can map directly to the specific share without any problems at all.. go figure) -- SO -- if you can get your hands on a TCOE system, you can run 'configure --disable-shared --enable-statid' and then you can port your /usr/local/samba directory around to the various other servers -- it appears to be stable thus far, and I'm just gonna keep my fingers crossed no -- I don't have any clue how you get from OE to TCOE without re-installing -- sorry for that one... later all! toph -- Forwarded message -- From: topher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:32:25 -0400 Subject: Fwd: Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] got a couple of requests for further information -- so here's an update: yes, I've done the configure and make as root and as a regular user, things die with either compiler in the same place I'm afraid yes, I've run 'autoconf' before running configure, and the only difference I've seen is that the errors during configure get more 'stuff' wrapped around them to make them more apparent... the errors in the log are the same -- here is the exact error message I get during make using gcc: Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:109, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: error: parse error before sendfile /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: error: parse error before bsize_t /usr/include/sys/socket.h:486: error: parse error before sendpath /usr/include/sys/socket.h:486: error: parse error before bsize_t /usr/include/sys/socket.h:493: error: parse error before sendfile64 /usr/include/sys/socket.h:493: error: parse error before bsize64_t /usr/include/sys/socket.h:495: error: parse error before sendpath64 /usr/include/sys/socket.h:495: error: parse error before bsize64_t In file included from /usr/include/sys/mp.h:55, from /usr/include/sys/malloc.h:59, from /usr/include/net/netmp.h:53, from /usr/include/net/if.h:59, from include/includes.h:275, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/machine/sys/setjmp.h:45: error: redefinition of `struct label_t' In file included from dynconfig.c:21: include/includes.h:495: error: conflicting types for `socklen_t' /usr/include/sys/socket.h:199: error: previous declaration of `socklen_t' make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 any other thoughts/suggestions are appreciated and MORE than welcome! toph -- Forwarded message -- From: topher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:32:06 -0400 Subject: Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] First -- to avoid the common answers to the 'building on HP-UX' questions that seem to be available on the list and the web: 1) using the depot from the Porting Center won't work, it's well downrev of 3.0.5 and I need to get the new security fixes (so that the security team will go back into it's dark dank den and fear not for the security of our environment) 2) samba.org only has a 3.0.4a binary package for HP-UX -- so again, no security fixes as such, I'm trying to build 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11 -- and I'm running into the same problem I pretty much always seem to run into: if I use gcc (gcc 3.3.2 off the porting center), configure runs through with several errors that look like: configure: WARNING: foo/bar.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: foo/bar.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: foo/bar.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result where foo
Re: [Samba] samba runs 1 month and then crash and never come back
I recompiled, its working again do you think it solved or the problem will be back??? John H Terpstra wrote: On Thursday 29 July 2004 11:22, you wrote: Nope, no one touched the machine in 2 days I'm trying the reboot but then what? is it a bug??? I'm using 3.0.5 version Could it be possible that you have updated or patched glibc recently? What is your OS? How is it updated? Did you build the Samba installation or did you obtain it from elsewhere? - John T. John H Terpstra wrote: James, Did you update glibc by any chance? Have you rebooted the system and does it still happen following a reboot? What version of Samba is this? - John T. On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:44, James Coggan wrote: guys need help my samba was working fine for about 1 month then it stoped working and now i get this error log ... [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(787) loaded services [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 3] smbd/server.c:main(802) Becoming a daemon. [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:process_exists(1259) PANIC: assert failed at lib/util.c(1259) [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: assert failed [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 8 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #6 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41] [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 26661 (3.0.5) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: internal error [2004/07/29 13:36:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x1d2) [0x81da689] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d0e] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5d75] #4 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40200078] #5 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x178) [0x402015a8] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81da786] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x13) [0x81da4b2] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_exists+0x70) [0x81da2d1] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_pid+0xac) [0x81c8020] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(pidfile_create+0x3a) [0x81c80ce] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4dc) [0x823ca74] #12 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x401ec936] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8074f41 my smb.conf [global] load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 admin users = @domain_admins logon drive = H: domain master = Yes encrypt passwords = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/smbpasswd -U %u smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd logon home = \\action\%u printer admin = @domain_admins wins support = yes netbios name = ACTION printing = cups printcap name = cups logon script = LOGIN.BAT default = global # dos charset = 850 unix password sync = yes workgroup = COGGAN logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U os level = 99 preferred master = yes local master = yes security = user # unix charset = ISO8859-1 domain logons = Yes log level = 5 passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* passwd chat debug = Yes time server = yes server string = Samba %v as PDC add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g 106 -d /dev/null -s /bin/False %u [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon write list = @domain_admins [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [profiles] path = /home/profile browsable = no writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [public] path = /home/pub read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @users @domain_admins [backup] path = /backup read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @users @domain_admins [alquest] path = /home/alquest read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes valid users = @users @domain_admins write list = @domain_admins #[downloads] # path = /home/downloads # read only = No # create mask = 0777 # directory mask = 0777 # valid users = @users @domain_admins # write list
Re: [Samba] Speed issue with one directory only
Hi , browsing with webmin is no test at all, winxp has a service running called windows xp Webclient disable it for a better performance browsing networks disable buggy win xp firewall (check other firewall products might run) check your tcp/ip settings ( do you have a winsserver , or is samba your winserver , did you include it ? ) install a dns server, read the faqs , check your logs think of if you connecting to that share that windows makes a look on it to play the right related icons relating to you file types ( you may disable this in explorer settings) high log level slow down samba , as wrong performance settings, in the smb.conf Regards Jamie Heinzel -- Work schrieb: I am having a speed issue with Samba and only one folder (/var/www/html) I'm not sure what to try next. I have problems browsing to this folder from WINXP, it seems to hang for about 30 seconds before accessing it. This doesn't happen with any other directories on the box. This directory has a Samba share setup for it, but the speed issue comes up if I use another share and browse to this directory too. Also I have tried browsing to this directory with Webmin's file manager and it also has speed issues, so anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance. Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind + ext3 ACLs
Hi folks, For the longest time, I've had a problem changing or modifying ACLs from my window clients. Whenever I tried, I'd get this in the logs: [2004/07/29 12:36:26, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(823) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-1292428093-651377827-x-1333 to uid or gid. I could change the ACLs using getfacl/setfacl, btw. After a little investigation, I think I've found the problem. I'm using winbind here, but I'm using this option: winbind use default domain = yes Which, for the sake of completeness, strips out domain info out of the username. So instead of `BOCA/skennedy`, it comes out as `skennedy`. This is where I think my problem is. Using wbinfo, I resolved that SID to BOCA/skennedy, who happens to be a completely different user name. My question is this: Does my logic seem correct to everyone else? Is there anything else I should be looking at? Further, does anybody have a solution to this problem? This server is also a web/email server for the intranet, and I am trying to avoid setting up a new server ( we have 4 going already, mainly for window crap ) if at all possible. Any help is greatly apprecaited. Sean -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] moving roaming profiles from 1 server to another
hi all I'm trying to move a roaming profile directory structure from 1 server to another Server 1 - old server to be phased out Server 2 new server At moment, user home directories are on server 2 along with various applications Server 1 has an ldap database, servies the printing and stores the roaming profiles The idea is to phase everything onto Server 2 Looking at my samba book, the smb.conf entry logon path=backslashbackslash%Lbackslashprofilesbackslash%u is a UNC that is relative to the profiles share. Would a simple way of moving the storage of the roaming profiles be to create a profiles share on server 2 and then replace %L in the above statement on server 1 to be the hostname of Server 2 ... or do I have to set up an nfs mount from server 1 to server 2 that points to the appropriate directory and use that? BTW Samba 2.2.8a TIA Alex Sent using Mulberry 3.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Winbind + ext3 ACLs
You should set up smb.conf like that: winbind trusted domains only = yes winbind use default domain = no When you change acl in files server, you will do: setacl -m u:skennedy:rwx,d:u:skennedy:rwx vattelapesca.doc u. Il gio, 2004-07-29 alle 23:06, Sean Kennedy ha scritto: Hi folks, For the longest time, I've had a problem changing or modifying ACLs from my window clients. Whenever I tried, I'd get this in the logs: [2004/07/29 12:36:26, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(823) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-1292428093-651377827-x-1333 to uid or gid. I could change the ACLs using getfacl/setfacl, btw. After a little investigation, I think I've found the problem. I'm using winbind here, but I'm using this option: winbind use default domain = yes Which, for the sake of completeness, strips out domain info out of the username. So instead of `BOCA/skennedy`, it comes out as `skennedy`. This is where I think my problem is. Using wbinfo, I resolved that SID to BOCA/skennedy, who happens to be a completely different user name. My question is this: Does my logic seem correct to everyone else? Is there anything else I should be looking at? Further, does anybody have a solution to this problem? This server is also a web/email server for the intranet, and I am trying to avoid setting up a new server ( we have 4 going already, mainly for window crap ) if at all possible. Any help is greatly apprecaited. Sean ___ Umberto Zanatta linuxDidattica tel: +39 (335) 54 71 385 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://linuxdidattica.org ___ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Winbind + ext3 ACLs
Umberto Zanatta wrote: You should set up smb.conf like that: winbind trusted domains only = yes winbind use default domain = no When you change acl in files server, you will do: setacl -m u:skennedy:rwx,d:u:skennedy:rwx vattelapesca.doc u. I am so confused. :) I tried it out on my test server, and your advice worked flawlessly! Then...I tried it on my work server, and it failed, displaying the domains as well. So then, after I fixed that, I checked out the man page, and found this: winbind trusted domains only (G) This parameter is designed to allow Samba servers that are mem- bers of a Samba controlled domain to use UNIX accounts dis- tributed via NIS, rsync, or LDAP as the uids for winbindd users in the hosts primary domain. Therefore, the user DOMAIN\user1 would be mapped to the account user1 in /etc/passwd instead of allocating a new uid for him or her. Default: winbind trusted domains only = no Given my setup, I have no users in /etc/passwd, beyond what the system is installed with, so it shouldn't have worked, even on my test system. I mean, if that's what I need to do, then that's what i need to do, but I want to understand what this is doing before I jump into it. :) Thank you for your help thus far! Sean Il gio, 2004-07-29 alle 23:06, Sean Kennedy ha scritto: /Hi folks, For the longest time, I've had a problem changing or modifying ACLs from my window clients. Whenever I tried, I'd get this in the logs: [2004/07/29 12:36:26, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(823) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-1292428093-651377827-x-1333 to uid or gid. I could change the ACLs using getfacl/setfacl, btw. After a little investigation, I think I've found the problem. I'm using winbind here, but I'm using this option: winbind use default domain = yes Which, for the sake of completeness, strips out domain info out of the username. So instead of `BOCA/skennedy`, it comes out as `skennedy`. This is where I think my problem is. Using wbinfo, I resolved that SID to BOCA/skennedy, who happens to be a completely different user name. My question is this: Does my logic seem correct to everyone else? Is there anything else I should be looking at? Further, does anybody have a solution to this problem? This server is also a web/email server for the intranet, and I am trying to avoid setting up a new server ( we have 4 going already, mainly for window crap ) if at all possible. Any help is greatly apprecaited. Sean/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation
Hi, but you can copy the local profile to another directroy and then create a new user... log in first as this user...log out... log in as administrator and copy the content of the original profile in the new created profile... and then if everything works...you can delete the old user... that doing would keep the specific settings of the user... the problem must be somewhere in the users-settings, because the username / password works on other workstations, and on this workstation other users /passwords work correct. Arno -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2004 14:06 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation I have tried everything : logging of the user; rebooting machines... I have thought about giving a new username; but there are lots of programs installed on his machine; all with registry dependencies (Delphi 5 for one) and creating a new user would make him loose all his settings (we don't save the profile on the servers) Samba sid et all are correct. Bert De Ridder Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/07/2004 11:01 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation Hi, i?m wondering about that this behavior is only for one user.. why does another user in the same segment of the domain not behave similar? How did you changed the users to try?? Did you just log of the user mschijva and logged on with a diffrent user again.. or did you restart the computer and logged in as a diffrent user? just a silly question: when this is the only one user with that behavior why you don?t give him a new username? Did you checked the uid / samba-SID and any nurmeric value of that user in his ldap-entry? -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 15:09 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1workstation It becomes VERY weird... This afternoon I witnessed the following : the user logged on to his pc; accessed his home directory on the PDC; no problema; accessed another share on the PDC; no problema; accessed a share on the BDC : connection refused. Going back to the PDC to access the home directory : connection refused. However; there were NO error entries in the logs on either Samba server. Only entries like these : [2004/07/28 13:29:38, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) allier (192.168.0.190) connect to service cvs initially as user mschijva (uid=1015, gid=100) (pid 22284) I'm completely lost now Bert De Ridder Arno Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/07/2004 11:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject AW: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom1workstation Hi, what os does the client have? W98? in the system-controll folder there should be a icon (in german called Verwaltung) whre the local policies , the settings for odbc ...and mor are... there should be also an icon called eventmanager / display... maybe there is a log entry? Did you see some errrors on the samba side (instead of the connection reset by peer) if you try a higher debug-/log-level? the other way is, that you back-up the users home-directory, and his roaming-profile and completely remove him and (from windows / ldap / samba ...) and readd him as a new user with a empty home and profile-directory... and then just put the saved-files (from the profile / homedirectory in the new created profile / home-directory in. it could be that there are some settings in the profile are wrong. -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 08:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Samba] Samba - LDAP - User cannot loginfrom 1 workstation Yes, I have checked the LDAP entry; I even recreated it; I tried the user/pwd on 3 other machines : 2000 Prof. Wks; 2000 Server and XP Prof. The local permissions on the machine are OK; I can add the domain user to the local admin. group, so that should be ok. I agree that it is not a server-side issue; but where on the client can I start searching for errors ? Regards, Bert De Ridder PeopleWare NV - Head Office Cdt.Weynsstraat 85 B-2660 Hoboken Tel: +32 3 448.33.38 Fax: +32 3 448.32.66
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.x and high processor utilication caused by /etc/passwd access
Jeremy,
seems not to help. I have disabled nscd with /etc/init.d/nscd stop but
the situation keeps unchanged. A few minutes after stopping and starting
samba I have the same situation. Here is may nsswitch.conf. What should
I change in it? Do you have any other idea?
regads, Heiko
/etc/nsswitch.conf
##
passwd: compat
group: compat
shadow: compat
hosts: files dns
networks: files
protocols: db files
services: db files
ethers: db files
rpc:db files
netgroup: nis
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 08:18:22PM +0200, Böringer, Heiko wrote:
Hello together,
since upgrading on samba 3.0.x (issue happens with all 3.0. release) the
cpu-load on my samba PDC ist constantly near 100%. The cpu power ist
consumed by all running smb-processes. Systrace shows me that the smb
processes tried to access to /etc/passwd on a permanent basis. My question
is: Why tries samba to access etc/passwd so often and produces this high
cpu-load?
Regards,
Heiko Böringer
Rights for smbpasswd are set as following
-rw-r--r--1 root root 5540 Jul 27 15:15 passwd
Systemconfiguration
- Debian 3.0 (Woddy)
- Samba with an the samba3.0.5.deb from the unstable tree (but happends
with
all other versions too)
- Configured als PDC with SMBPASSWD Authentification (no windbind, kerberos,
ldap..)
TOP shows the following
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
19094 nobody18 0 3872 3872 3440 R 8.7 0.7 43:22 smbd
5213 nobody18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:43 smbd
9345 nobody17 0 4100 4100 3628 R 8.7 0.7 29:24 smbd
10237 nobody19 0 3772 3772 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:06 smbd
17121 nobody17 0 4140 4140 3632 R 8.7 0.8 28:02 smbd
20776 nobody18 0 3668 3668 3324 R 8.7 0.7 27:48 smbd
17915 nobody18 0 3768 3768 3388 R 8.7 0.7 46:35 smbd
18441 nobody17 0 4128 4128 3640 R 8.5 0.7 45:16 smbd
25605 nobody18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.5 0.7 6:38 smbd
1065 root 16 0 5504 5504 3928 R 7.1 1.0 0:59 smbd
28475 root 9 0 4280 4280 3700 S 0.3 0.8 0:02 smbd
Systrace on one of the smbd processes shows the following:
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 26
fcntl64(26, F_GETFD)= 0
fcntl64(26, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
_llseek(26, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 5540, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 26, 0) = 0x4051
_llseek(26, 5540, [5540], SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat64(26, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5540, ...}) = 0
munmap(0x4051, 5540)= 0
close(26) = 0
socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 26
connect(26, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path=/var/run/.nscd_socket}, 110) = -1
ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)
close(26) = 0
Looks like a nsswitch bug whilst talking to nscd. Turn off
nscd from nsswitch.conf and see if the problem still occurs.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3 PDC with LDAP backend problem
I am installing an Samba 3 PDC with an OpenLDAP backend. I am currently having a problem when I try to add a Windows workstation to the domain with the Administrator user or trying to connect to a share. I get the following error : [2004/07/29 13:35:22, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(822) User Administrator in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! [2004/07/29 13:35:22, 0] auth/auth_sam.c:check_sam_security(260) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER' But the user exists in my ldap, because if I do this command : # getent passwd | grep Administrator Administrator:x:0:512:Netbios Domain Administrator:/home/:/bin/false nss_ldap is installed and configured proprely : # grep ldap /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files ldap group: files ldap # Here is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = DEV_BLC netbios name = ud1981wfx01 passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ud1981wfx01 #username map = /etc/samba/smbusers add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m '%u' delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel %u add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p '%g' delete group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupdel '%g' add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/ \ smbldap-groupmod -m '%g' '%u' delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/ \ smbldap-groupmod -x '%g' '%u' set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/ \ smbldap-usermod -g '%g' '%u' add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w '%u' #logon script = scripts\logon.bat #logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U #logon drive = H: #logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 35 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes ldap suffix = dc=blc,dc=com ldap machine suffix = ou=People ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=People ldap idmap suffix = ou=People ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=blc,dc=com idmap backend = ldap:ldap://ud1981wfx01 ldap passwd sync = Yes idmap uid = 15000-2 idmap gid = 15000-2 winbind separator = + [share1] path = /tmp [share2] path = / browseable = Yes comment = Some random files Any idea ? - Francois -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba 3 PDC with LDAP backend problem
ldap machine suffix = ou=People ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=People Sure the above shouldn't be ou=Group? Can you do this and see ldap users?: getent group ldap idmap suffix = ou=People ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=blc,dc=com idmap backend = ldap:ldap://ud1981wfx01 ldap passwd sync = Yes idmap uid = 15000-2 idmap gid = 15000-2 winbind separator = + -- - | I can be reached on the following Instant Messenger services: | |---| | MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: WyteLi0n ICQ: 123291844 | |---| | Y!: j_c_llings Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| - -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Time out failure with mvfs on Linux - FIXED
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:31:53PM +0100, Nick THOMPSON wrote: Well, worked around. It seems statfs returns a zero value for the block size, which is then passed to adjust_blocks in the fromsize parameter. This causes a divide by zero exception. I have modified the function to check for the zero value and assume a reasonable default. I have reported the issue to Rational, for a real fix, but I guess Samba should protect itself anyway and prevent the exception if it can. Yep - I agree. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Symlinks out of sharing still not working on 3.0.5
Hi guys, samba client version 3.0.5, server version 3.0.5, kernel 2.4.26. Relevant configs on server: unix extensions = Yes wide links = Yes follow symlinks = Yes On client computer with home user mounted via smbfs I'm trying this: D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] cd /tmp D102-054 [/tmp] mkdir dest_dir D102-054 [/tmp] cd - D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] ln -s /tmp/dest_dir orig_dir D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] ls -la total 524292 drwx--1 dito bcc 0 Jul 29 21:11 . drwx-x1 dito alunos 4096 Jul 29 21:08 .. lrwxrwxrwx1 dito bcc12 Jul 29 21:11 orig_dir - tmp/dest_dir Why samba is linking to tmp/dest_dir when should link to /tmp/dest_dir? (note initial slash missing) D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] mkdir tmp2 D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] mkdir dest_dir2 D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] cd tmp2 D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp/tmp2] ln -s ../dest_dir2 orig_dir2 ln: creating symbolic link `orig_dir2' to `../dest_dir2': input/output error Other symlinks that don't start whith .. ou / works properly. What's going on here? This is driving me crazy! Thanks in advance. __ Vandeir Eduardo (CCNA, LPIC-2) Laboratório de Computação e Informática (LCI) - Campus IV Fundacao Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB) Rua Braz Wanka, 238 - CEP: 89.035-160 - Blumenau (SC) Blumenau, SC, Brasil. Fone: +55 (047) 321-7819 - Fax: 321-7802 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Symlinks out of sharing still not working on 3.0.5
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:28:04PM -0300, Vandeir Eduardo wrote: Hi guys, samba client version 3.0.5, server version 3.0.5, kernel 2.4.26. Relevant configs on server: unix extensions = Yes wide links = Yes follow symlinks = Yes On client computer with home user mounted via smbfs I'm trying this: D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] cd /tmp D102-054 [/tmp] mkdir dest_dir D102-054 [/tmp] cd - D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] ln -s /tmp/dest_dir orig_dir D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] ls -la total 524292 drwx--1 dito bcc 0 Jul 29 21:11 . drwx-x1 dito alunos 4096 Jul 29 21:08 .. lrwxrwxrwx1 dito bcc12 Jul 29 21:11 orig_dir - tmp/dest_dir Why samba is linking to tmp/dest_dir when should link to /tmp/dest_dir? (note initial slash missing) D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] mkdir tmp2 D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] mkdir dest_dir2 D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] cd tmp2 D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp/tmp2] ln -s ../dest_dir2 orig_dir2 ln: creating symbolic link `orig_dir2' to `../dest_dir2': input/output error Other symlinks that don't start whith .. ou / works properly. What's going on here? This is driving me crazy! smbfs doesn't support symlinks correctly I believe. I would strongly suggest using the CIFSFS client - this does work and is in fact the target platform for Linux client - Samba Server CIFS. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.x and high processor utilication caused by /etc/passwd access
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 09:04, Heiko Boeringer wrote: Jeremy, seems not to help. I have disabled nscd with /etc/init.d/nscd stop but the situation keeps unchanged. A few minutes after stopping and starting samba I have the same situation. Here is may nsswitch.conf. What should I change in it? Do you have any other idea? There is an issue (fixed in SVN?) when we have a group, with a member that does not 'exist'. Check that all your group members are valid accounts. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Teamhttp://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3 + LDAP as PDC join domain problem
Hi all, I've setup Samba 3.0.5 + OpenLDAP (ldapsam) and everything work correctly. However, while my Windows 200x workstation join the domain, I need to join it twice. Here is what I do: 1. Go to Computer properties - Computer Name - Change 2. Enter the new domain name 3. Enter Administrator and password then, it will return me that the user name cannot be found. I've checked the LDAP directory that the computer account is created successfully without any problem. So, I click OK again and enter the Administrator account password again, and it success. So, I'd like to know, why I need to do it twice even though the computer account is already created successfully at the fist time? Thanks a lot. --- Jacky C.K Tsoi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba and kerberos MIT
Hallo I have W2k workstation with authentication on a MIT Kerberos server. This works fine. But how must i config the samba, to use MIT as the Kerberos Server? I Don't want use Microsoft ADS! Software: - Windows 2000 Pro - Fedora 2 Thanks for help. Karl Heinz Wichmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba and kerberos MIT
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 15:27, karl wichmann wrote: Hallo I have W2k workstation with authentication on a MIT Kerberos server. This works fine. But how must i config the samba, to use MIT as the Kerberos Server? I Don't want use Microsoft ADS! Software: - Windows 2000 Pro - Fedora 2 I'm yet to test this patch, but this is how I want to do it. You will need to add a host/ and a cifs/[EMAIL PROTECTED] principals to your local keytab, and set 'use kerberos keytab = yes'. Let me know how it all goes :-) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Teamhttp://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r1602 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw
Author: tridge Date: 2004-07-29 08:14:34 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1602 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/clisession.c Log: make sure we honor the use_spnego flag WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1602nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1603 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw
Author: tridge Date: 2004-07-29 09:30:54 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1603 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/clitransport.c Log: fixed in.size to not overstate the packet size by 4 bytes my apologies to abartlett for thinking this was his bug! WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1603nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1604 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-07-29 10:13:34 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1604 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/smb_signing.c Log: Samba4 avoids memcpy() as much as possible - we don't need to make a copy here. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1604nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1605 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-07-29 10:33:36 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1605 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec_krb5.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.c Log: GENSEC krb5 updates - fix a valgrind found uninitialised variable, and allow tests for 'unwrapped' krb5, allowed by Win2k3. SPENGO changes, trying to get the logic right (when and what sub-mechanisms to wrap). Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1605nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1606 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib
Author: tridge Date: 2004-07-29 11:55:57 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1606 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/util_sock.c Log: make the low level socket read/write routines cope properly with non-blocking sockets WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1606nolog=1
svn commit: linux-cifs-client r2 - /
Author: metze Date: 2004-07-29 19:29:08 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 2 Added: dummy Log: add dummy commit test file metze WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=linux-cifs-clientpath=/rev=2nolog=1
svn commit: linux-cifs-client r3 - in branches: . linux-2.4 linux-2.4/fs linux-2.4/fs/cifs
Author: metze Date: 2004-07-29 19:45:51 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 3 Added: branches/linux-2.4/ branches/linux-2.4/26to24_backporting_considerations branches/linux-2.4/cifs_24.patch branches/linux-2.4/cifs_25.patch branches/linux-2.4/fs/ branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/ branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/AUTHORS branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/CHANGES branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/Makefile branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/README branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/TODO branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/asn1.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifs_unicode.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifs_unicode.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifs_uniupr.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifserr.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/connect.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/dir.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/file.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/inode.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/link.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/md4.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/md5.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/md5.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/misc.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/netmisc.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/nterr.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/nterr.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/rfc1002pdu.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/smbdes.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/smbencrypt.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/smberr.c branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/smberr.h branches/linux-2.4/fs/cifs/transport.c Log: import a copy of cifsvfs from cvs into branches/linux-2.4 (I run 'find -type f |xargs chmod -x' before commit) metze WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=linux-cifs-clientpath=/branchesrev=3nolog=1
svn commit: linux-cifs-client r4 - branches/linux-2.4
Author: sfrench Date: 2004-07-29 20:30:55 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 4 Removed: branches/linux-2.4/cifs_25.patch Log: Remove obsolete file WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=linux-cifs-clientpath=/rev=4nolog=1
svn commit: linux-cifs-client r5 - in branches: . linux-2.6bk linux-2.6bk/fs linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs
Author: sfrench Date: 2004-07-29 21:53:31 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 5 Added: branches/linux-2.6bk/ branches/linux-2.6bk/README branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/ branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/ branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/AUTHORS branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/CHANGES branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/Makefile branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/README branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/TODO branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/asn1.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs.ko branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs.mod.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs_fs_sb.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs_unicode.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs_unicode.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifs_uniupr.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/connect.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/dir.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/fcntl.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/file.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/inode.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/link.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/md4.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/md5.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/md5.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/misc.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/netmisc.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/nterr.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/nterr.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/rfc1002pdu.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/smbdes.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/smbencrypt.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/smberr.h branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/transport.c branches/linux-2.6bk/fs/cifs/xattr.c Log: Create 2.6 branch to keep snapshorts of linux-cifs-client WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=linux-cifs-clientpath=/branchesrev=5nolog=1
svn commit: linux-cifs-client r7 - trunk
Author: metze Date: 2004-07-29 22:35:59 + (Thu, 29 Jul 2004) New Revision: 7 Added: trunk/README trunk/fs/ Log: copy linux-2.6bk code to trunk metze WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=linux-cifs-clientpath=/rev=7nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1607 - trunk/source/lib
Author: jra Date: 2004-07-30 00:19:24 + (Fri, 30 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1607 Modified: trunk/source/lib/fsusage.c Log: Fix from Nick THOMPSON [EMAIL PROTECTED] to protect smbd against broken filesystems which return zero blocksize. Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1607nolog=1
