Re: [SMW-devel] Form edit with multiple templates limit

[Yaron Koren]

Hi Sal,

A few variations on this question have come up on the mailing lists
recently. SF itself doesn't impose any limits - but PHP and/or Javascript
have their own natural limits, PHP by limiting the number of fields whose
value can be passed when the form is submitted, and Javascript by slowing
down the browser. If your issue is the former, it may be possible to fix it
by changing the setting; with the latter, a different browser may work
better.

-Yaron


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Sal Quintanilla  wrote:

> What’s the limit on the number of template instances that can be displayed
> in a form that uses multiple?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sal
>
>
> --
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
> Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>
>


-- 
WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] Form edit with multiple templates limit

[trueskew]

Thanks Yaron, I'll give those a try.

 

In my case, it manifested when I added one more instance.  The form opened
up and let me add content just fine, but on save it essentially re-rendered
the form (still in edit mode) with my addition removed.

 

From: Yaron Koren [mailto:ya...@wikiworks.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:23 AM
To: Sal Quintanilla
Cc: Semantic MediaWiki developers
Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Form edit with multiple templates limit

 

Hi Sal,

 

A few variations on this question have come up on the mailing lists
recently. SF itself doesn't impose any limits - but PHP and/or Javascript
have their own natural limits, PHP by limiting the number of fields whose
value can be passed when the form is submitted, and Javascript by slowing
down the browser. If your issue is the former, it may be possible to fix it
by changing the setting; with the latter, a different browser may work
better.

 

-Yaron

 

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Sal Quintanilla  wrote:

What's the limit on the number of template instances that can be displayed
in a form that uses multiple?

 

Thanks.

Sal



--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831
 &iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel





 

-- 
WikiWorks . MediaWiki Consulting . http://wikiworks.com 

--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

[SMW-devel] Form edit with multiple templates limit

[Sal Quintanilla]

What's the limit on the number of template instances that can be displayed
in a form that uses multiple?

 

Thanks.

Sal

--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] [Semediawiki-user] Annotating in SMW

[Yaron Koren]

Hi,

Bernhard - you've made a good case for having annotator functionality
within MediaWiki. What you haven't really made a good case for is being
able to query that annotation info using SMW, which is the relevant thing
here.

David - if you want to talk about the general stuff, you should probably
start a separate thread for it. :)

-Yaron


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Krabina Bernhard wrote:

> hmm. short answer:
>
> As WikiMediaLabs is doing this:
> http://annotator.wmflabs.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum it is probably going to be
> available in MW installations. Therfore it makes sense to have some
> semantification of it (and yes, general semantification is an interesting
> topic, the special semantic properties go in this right direction)
>
> long anwer:
> Sometimes I have the feeling that SMW users and devs still have the
> semantic encyclopedia in mind. My use cases are far more off this track.
> SMW has it's clear strenghts, but for some features, others put up very
> quick and sometimes very nice features. e.g.
> http://annotateit.org/
> http://etherpad.org/
>
> There are many use cases for this and of cource, then the easiest solution
> is to use these pieces of software. But if you look at this page
> https://github.com/okfn/annotator/wiki you can see a lot of plugins
> already available for systems like Drupal. As great as wikis are in general
> for many many use cases, for some things there are simpler solutions. to
> have these possibilities integrated in the SMW ecosystems seems a worthwile
> effort.
>
> concrete use case i was thinking of: a city releasing agenda items,
> protocols, decisions, regulacitons etc. of municipal council meetings on a
> wiki. the general public should not be able to edit these, but annotate
> them (and rate them).
>
> regards,
> Bernhard
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> >
> > Hi Yaron!
> >
> >
> > I'm in favor in semantifying everything but here I'd agree with you -
> > I don't yet see the usecase where it would be useful to have
> > semantified inline comments. Or any comments and discussions, for
> > that matter.
> >
> >
> > -
> > Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yaron Koren < ya...@wikiworks.com >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Bernhard,
> >
> >
> > This seems like a case of the "when you have a hammer, everything
> > looks like a nail" principle. :) If the extension used - whether
> > it's Annotator or anything else - is keeping annotation information,
> > it's presumably using one or more of its own database tables to do
> > that. And so the most logical place to put tools to query and
> > display that information would be in that extension itself, not via
> > SMW. You could make the case for a "Semantic Annotator" extension
> > that stores the text directly via SMW, but I don't see the benefit
> > in that. The use cases you present are all (not surprisingly)
> > self-contained - there's nothing like "show, in a table, all
> > annotations for pages about cars from before 1950". So I don't see
> > much "synergy" in being able to query everything together.
> >
> >
> > This starts to get into the larger question of whether SMW should be
> > able to query any wiki-related data - the so-called
> > "semantification" concept - but I would think if we're going to have
> > that discussion, we should have that larger discussion, and not tie
> > it to this particular feature.
> >
> >
> > -Yaron
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Krabina Bernhard < krab...@kdz.or.at
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Great, I didn't know about MashaJS. Is there a test wiki around. In
> > the discussion there is a hint that it does not work with
> > HeaderTabs...
> >
> >
> > > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> > > comments?
> >
> > There can be reasons, where
> >
> > a) I want to have an overview of remarks that users made and the talk
> > page and/or version history is too cumbersome, because you have to
> > switch around all the time. If you want to ask users for comments on
> > a text, a regular wiki is not very usable. annotations are great
> > here.
> > b) users don't want to/dare to/should not edit the text itself, but
> > still should have to possibility to add/enhance/comment on the text
> >
> > It would be great to have features like:
> > * show only annotations of user X on the page
> > * show the text with annotations of users X and Y, but not from Z
> > * show the users with most annotations
> > ...
> >
> > regards,
> > Bernhard
> >
> >
> > - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Bernhard!
> > > Nice extension, reminds me of MashaJS:
> > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MashaJS
> > >
> > >
> > > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> > > comments?
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Krabina Bernhard <
> > > krab...@kdz.or.at > wrote:
>

Re: [SMW-devel] [SMW Composer] Extension configuration

[James HK]

Hi,

> Some changes in SMW where made recently that limit usage of the namespace
> constants in a way that was not present before. This is an exceptional case
> and should definitely be documented. It might already be, I'm not sure.

Actually, the use of the Composer introduced a necessary adoption but
that have been dealt with [1] in a way that as long as you maintain
enableSemantics() within your LocalSettings (as it was required
before) the use of SMW-NS related configurations are not influenced by
the installation method.

PS: Someone made an effort to write a detailed guideline [2].

[1] https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/pull/47

[2]  
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Help_talk:Installation/MW_1.22_and_SMW_1.9beta_install/upgrade

Cheers

On 12/18/13, Jeroen De Dauw  wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> I had assumed that, but I was getting errors with undefined namespaces
> (SMW_NS constants) that I was referencing after the (removed) require_once
> statements.
>
> Some changes in SMW where made recently that limit usage of the namespace
> constants in a way that was not present before. This is an exceptional case
> and should definitely be documented. It might already be, I'm not sure.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Jeroen De Dauw
> http://www.bn2vs.com
> Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
> --
>

--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] [SMW Composer] Extension configuration

[Jeroen De Dauw]

Hey,

> I had assumed that, but I was getting errors with undefined namespaces
(SMW_NS constants) that I was referencing after the (removed) require_once
statements.

Some changes in SMW where made recently that limit usage of the namespace
constants in a way that was not present before. This is an exceptional case
and should definitely be documented. It might already be, I'm not sure.

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
--
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] [Semediawiki-user] Annotating in SMW

[Krabina Bernhard]

hmm. short answer: 

As WikiMediaLabs is doing this: http://annotator.wmflabs.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum 
it is probably going to be available in MW installations. Therfore it makes 
sense to have some semantification of it (and yes, general semantification is 
an interesting topic, the special semantic properties go in this right 
direction)

long anwer:
Sometimes I have the feeling that SMW users and devs still have the semantic 
encyclopedia in mind. My use cases are far more off this track. SMW has it's 
clear strenghts, but for some features, others put up very quick and sometimes 
very nice features. e.g. 
http://annotateit.org/
http://etherpad.org/

There are many use cases for this and of cource, then the easiest solution is 
to use these pieces of software. But if you look at this page 
https://github.com/okfn/annotator/wiki you can see a lot of plugins already 
available for systems like Drupal. As great as wikis are in general for many 
many use cases, for some things there are simpler solutions. to have these 
possibilities integrated in the SMW ecosystems seems a worthwile effort.

concrete use case i was thinking of: a city releasing agenda items, protocols, 
decisions, regulacitons etc. of municipal council meetings on a wiki. the 
general public should not be able to edit these, but annotate them (and rate 
them).

regards,
Bernhard


- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> 
> Hi Yaron!
> 
> 
> I'm in favor in semantifying everything but here I'd agree with you -
> I don't yet see the usecase where it would be useful to have
> semantified inline comments. Or any comments and discussions, for
> that matter.
> 
> 
> -
> Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yaron Koren < ya...@wikiworks.com >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Bernhard,
> 
> 
> This seems like a case of the "when you have a hammer, everything
> looks like a nail" principle. :) If the extension used - whether
> it's Annotator or anything else - is keeping annotation information,
> it's presumably using one or more of its own database tables to do
> that. And so the most logical place to put tools to query and
> display that information would be in that extension itself, not via
> SMW. You could make the case for a "Semantic Annotator" extension
> that stores the text directly via SMW, but I don't see the benefit
> in that. The use cases you present are all (not surprisingly)
> self-contained - there's nothing like "show, in a table, all
> annotations for pages about cars from before 1950". So I don't see
> much "synergy" in being able to query everything together.
> 
> 
> This starts to get into the larger question of whether SMW should be
> able to query any wiki-related data - the so-called
> "semantification" concept - but I would think if we're going to have
> that discussion, we should have that larger discussion, and not tie
> it to this particular feature.
> 
> 
> -Yaron
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Krabina Bernhard < krab...@kdz.or.at
> > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Great, I didn't know about MashaJS. Is there a test wiki around. In
> the discussion there is a hint that it does not work with
> HeaderTabs...
> 
> 
> > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> > comments?
> 
> There can be reasons, where
> 
> a) I want to have an overview of remarks that users made and the talk
> page and/or version history is too cumbersome, because you have to
> switch around all the time. If you want to ask users for comments on
> a text, a regular wiki is not very usable. annotations are great
> here.
> b) users don't want to/dare to/should not edit the text itself, but
> still should have to possibility to add/enhance/comment on the text
> 
> It would be great to have features like:
> * show only annotations of user X on the page
> * show the text with annotations of users X and Y, but not from Z
> * show the users with most annotations
> ...
> 
> regards,
> Bernhard
> 
> 
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Hi Bernhard!
> > Nice extension, reminds me of MashaJS:
> > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MashaJS
> > 
> > 
> > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> > comments?
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Krabina Bernhard <
> > krab...@kdz.or.at > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > I just want to draw your attention to an interesting feature
> > currently missing in MW/SMW: the ability to easily annotate a
> > (wiki)
> > document. There are lots of usecases for this and there are some
> > first results. The interesting thing of course would be to make
> > annotations semantic and therfore queryable!
> > 
> > If anyone is interested, please look here:
> > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Annotator
> > 
> > (I'm not in any way involved in this, I just stumbled across it and
> > thought it's very interesting).
> > 
> > -Bernhard
> > 
> > --

Re: [SMW-devel] [SMW Composer] Extension configuration

[Jeroen De Dauw]

Hey,

Composer is "just" a dependency manager. It has nothing to do with
configuration. So how config is done in MediaWiki remains unchanged :)

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
--
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] [Semediawiki-user] Annotating in SMW

[Yury Katkov]

Hi Yaron!

I'm in favor in semantifying everything but here I'd agree with you - I
don't yet see the usecase where it would be useful to have semantified
inline comments. Or any comments and discussions, for that matter.

-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote



On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yaron Koren  wrote:

> Hi Bernhard,
>
> This seems like a case of the "when you have a hammer, everything looks
> like a nail" principle. :) If the extension used - whether it's Annotator
> or anything else - is keeping annotation information, it's presumably using
> one or more of its own database tables to do that. And so the most logical
> place to put tools to query and display that information would be in that
> extension itself, not via SMW. You could make the case for a "Semantic
> Annotator" extension that stores the text directly via SMW, but I don't see
> the benefit in that. The use cases you present are all (not surprisingly)
> self-contained - there's nothing like "show, in a table, all annotations
> for pages about cars from before 1950". So I don't see much "synergy" in
> being able to query everything together.
>
> This starts to get into the larger question of whether SMW should be able
> to query any wiki-related data - the so-called "semantification" concept -
> but I would think if we're going to have that discussion, we should have
> that larger discussion, and not tie it to this particular feature.
>
> -Yaron
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Krabina Bernhard wrote:
>
>> Great, I didn't know about MashaJS. Is there a test wiki around. In the
>> discussion there is a hint that it does not work with HeaderTabs...
>>
>> > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
>> > comments?
>>
>> There can be reasons, where
>>
>> a) I want to have an overview of remarks that users made and the talk
>> page and/or version history is too cumbersome, because you have to switch
>> around all the time. If you want to ask users for comments on a text, a
>> regular wiki is not very usable. annotations are great here.
>> b) users don't want to/dare to/should not edit the text itself, but still
>> should have to possibility to add/enhance/comment on the text
>>
>> It would be great to have features like:
>> * show only annotations of user X on the page
>> * show the text with annotations of users X and Y, but not from Z
>> * show the users with most annotations
>> ...
>>
>> regards,
>> Bernhard
>>
>>
>> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
>> >
>> > Hi Bernhard!
>> > Nice extension, reminds me of MashaJS:
>> > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MashaJS
>> >
>> >
>> > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
>> > comments?
>> >
>> >
>> > -
>> > Yury Katkov, WikiVote
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Krabina Bernhard <
>> > krab...@kdz.or.at > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I just want to draw your attention to an interesting feature
>> > currently missing in MW/SMW: the ability to easily annotate a (wiki)
>> > document. There are lots of usecases for this and there are some
>> > first results. The interesting thing of course would be to make
>> > annotations semantic and therfore queryable!
>> >
>> > If anyone is interested, please look here:
>> > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Annotator
>> >
>> > (I'm not in any way involved in this, I just stumbled across it and
>> > thought it's very interesting).
>> >
>> > -Bernhard
>> >
>> >
>> --
>> > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most
>> > IT
>> > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application
>> > performance
>> > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into
>> > your
>> > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of
>> > AppDynamics Pro!
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> > ___
>> > Semediawiki-devel mailing list
>> > Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
>> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
>> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
>> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
>> Pro!
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> ___
>> Semediawiki-user mailing list
>> semediawiki-u...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
>
---

Re: [SMW-devel] [Semediawiki-user] Annotating in SMW

[david mason]

On 17 December 2013 09:28, Yaron Koren  wrote:

>
> This starts to get into the larger question of whether SMW should be able
> to query any wiki-related data - the so-called "semantification" concept -
> but I would think if we're going to have that discussion, we should have
> that larger discussion, and not tie it to this particular feature.
>
> -Yaron
>
>
>
Please, let's have that conversation. (=

David
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] [Semediawiki-user] Annotating in SMW

[Yaron Koren]

Hi Bernhard,

This seems like a case of the "when you have a hammer, everything looks
like a nail" principle. :) If the extension used - whether it's Annotator
or anything else - is keeping annotation information, it's presumably using
one or more of its own database tables to do that. And so the most logical
place to put tools to query and display that information would be in that
extension itself, not via SMW. You could make the case for a "Semantic
Annotator" extension that stores the text directly via SMW, but I don't see
the benefit in that. The use cases you present are all (not surprisingly)
self-contained - there's nothing like "show, in a table, all annotations
for pages about cars from before 1950". So I don't see much "synergy" in
being able to query everything together.

This starts to get into the larger question of whether SMW should be able
to query any wiki-related data - the so-called "semantification" concept -
but I would think if we're going to have that discussion, we should have
that larger discussion, and not tie it to this particular feature.

-Yaron


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Krabina Bernhard  wrote:

> Great, I didn't know about MashaJS. Is there a test wiki around. In the
> discussion there is a hint that it does not work with HeaderTabs...
>
> > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> > comments?
>
> There can be reasons, where
>
> a) I want to have an overview of remarks that users made and the talk page
> and/or version history is too cumbersome, because you have to switch around
> all the time. If you want to ask users for comments on a text, a regular
> wiki is not very usable. annotations are great here.
> b) users don't want to/dare to/should not edit the text itself, but still
> should have to possibility to add/enhance/comment on the text
>
> It would be great to have features like:
> * show only annotations of user X on the page
> * show the text with annotations of users X and Y, but not from Z
> * show the users with most annotations
> ...
>
> regards,
> Bernhard
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> >
> > Hi Bernhard!
> > Nice extension, reminds me of MashaJS:
> > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MashaJS
> >
> >
> > Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> > comments?
> >
> >
> > -
> > Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Krabina Bernhard <
> > krab...@kdz.or.at > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I just want to draw your attention to an interesting feature
> > currently missing in MW/SMW: the ability to easily annotate a (wiki)
> > document. There are lots of usecases for this and there are some
> > first results. The interesting thing of course would be to make
> > annotations semantic and therfore queryable!
> >
> > If anyone is interested, please look here:
> > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Annotator
> >
> > (I'm not in any way involved in this, I just stumbled across it and
> > thought it's very interesting).
> >
> > -Bernhard
> >
> >
> --
> > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most
> > IT
> > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application
> > performance
> > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into
> > your
> > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of
> > AppDynamics Pro!
> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > ___
> > Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> > Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
> Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Semediawiki-user mailing list
> semediawiki-u...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user
>



-- 
WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-d

Re: [SMW-devel] Annotating in SMW

[Krabina Bernhard]

Great, I didn't know about MashaJS. Is there a test wiki around. In the 
discussion there is a hint that it does not work with HeaderTabs...

> Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> comments?

There can be reasons, where 

a) I want to have an overview of remarks that users made and the talk page 
and/or version history is too cumbersome, because you have to switch around all 
the time. If you want to ask users for comments on a text, a regular wiki is 
not very usable. annotations are great here.
b) users don't want to/dare to/should not edit the text itself, but still 
should have to possibility to add/enhance/comment on the text

It would be great to have features like:
* show only annotations of user X on the page
* show the text with annotations of users X and Y, but not from Z
* show the users with most annotations
...

regards,
Bernhard


- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> 
> Hi Bernhard!
> Nice extension, reminds me of MashaJS:
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MashaJS
> 
> 
> Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
> comments?
> 
> 
> -
> Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Krabina Bernhard <
> krab...@kdz.or.at > wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I just want to draw your attention to an interesting feature
> currently missing in MW/SMW: the ability to easily annotate a (wiki)
> document. There are lots of usecases for this and there are some
> first results. The interesting thing of course would be to make
> annotations semantic and therfore queryable!
> 
> If anyone is interested, please look here:
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Annotator
> 
> (I'm not in any way involved in this, I just stumbled across it and
> thought it's very interesting).
> 
> -Bernhard
> 
> --
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most
> IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application
> performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into
> your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of
> AppDynamics Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
> 
> 

--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Re: [SMW-devel] Annotating in SMW

[Yury Katkov]

Hi Bernhard!
Nice extension, reminds me of MashaJS:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MashaJS

Which use cases do you have in mind that involved queryable inline
comments?

-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote



On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Krabina Bernhard wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I just want to draw your attention to an interesting feature currently
> missing in MW/SMW: the ability to easily annotate a (wiki) document. There
> are lots of usecases for this and there are some first results. The
> interesting thing of course would be to make annotations semantic and
> therfore queryable!
>
> If anyone is interested, please look here:
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Annotator
>
> (I'm not in any way involved in this, I just stumbled across it and
> thought it's very interesting).
>
> -Bernhard
>
>
> --
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
> Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel