Re: SOLRJ replace document
So I found out the issue here... It was related to what you guys said regarding the Map object in my document. The problem is that I had data being serialized from DB - .NET - JSON and some of the fields in .NET was == System.DBNull.Value instead of null. This caused the JSON serializer to write out an object (ie. Map) so when these fields got deserialized into the SolrInputDocument it had the Map objects as you indicated. Thanks for the help! Much appreciated! On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote: By all means please do file a support request with DataStax, either as an official support ticket or as a question on StackOverflow. But, I do think the previous answer of avoiding the use of a Map object in your document is likely to be the solution. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Brent Ryan Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:21 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: SOLRJ replace document So I think the issue might be related to the tech stack we're using which is SOLR within DataStax enterprise which doesn't support atomic updates. But I think it must have some sort of bug around this because it doesn't appear to work correctly for this use case when using solrj ... Anyways, I've contacted support so lets see what they say. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 10/18/2013 3:36 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: My schema is pretty simple and has a string field called solr_id as my unique key. Once I get back to my computer I'll send some more details. If you are trying to use a Map object as the value of a field, that is probably why it is interpreting your add request as an atomic update. If this is the case, and you're doing it because you have a multivalued field, you can use a List object rather than a Map. If this doesn't sound like what's going on, can you share your code, or a simplification of the SolrJ parts of it? Thanks, Shawn
SOLRJ replace document
How do I replace a document in solr using solrj library? I keep getting this error back: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException: Atomic document updates are not supported unless updateLog/ is configured I don't want to do partial updates, I just want to replace it... Thanks, Brent
Re: SOLRJ replace document
To replace a Solr document, simply add it again using the same technique used to insert the original document. The set option for atomic update is only used when you wish to selectively update only some of the fields for a document, and that does require that the update log be enabled using updateLog. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Brent Ryan Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 4:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: SOLRJ replace document How do I replace a document in solr using solrj library? I keep getting this error back: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException: Atomic document updates are not supported unless updateLog/ is configured I don't want to do partial updates, I just want to replace it... Thanks, Brent
Re: SOLRJ replace document
I wish that was the case but calling addDoc() is what's triggering that exception. On Friday, October 18, 2013, Jack Krupansky wrote: To replace a Solr document, simply add it again using the same technique used to insert the original document. The set option for atomic update is only used when you wish to selectively update only some of the fields for a document, and that does require that the update log be enabled using updateLog. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Brent Ryan Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 4:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: SOLRJ replace document How do I replace a document in solr using solrj library? I keep getting this error back: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.**impl.HttpSolrServer$**RemoteSolrException: Atomic document updates are not supported unless updateLog/ is configured I don't want to do partial updates, I just want to replace it... Thanks, Brent
Re: SOLRJ replace document
On 10/18/2013 2:59 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: How do I replace a document in solr using solrj library? I keep getting this error back: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException: Atomic document updates are not supported unless updateLog/ is configured I don't want to do partial updates, I just want to replace it... Replacing a document is done by simply adding the document, in the same way as if you were adding a new one. If you have properly configured Solr, the old one will be deleted before the new one is inserted. Properly configuring Solr means that you have a uniqueKey field in yourschema, and that it is a simple type like string, int, long, etc, and is not multivalued. A TextField type that is tokenized cannot be used as the uniqueKey field. Thanks, Shawn
Re: SOLRJ replace document
My schema is pretty simple and has a string field called solr_id as my unique key. Once I get back to my computer I'll send some more details. Brent On Friday, October 18, 2013, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 10/18/2013 2:59 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: How do I replace a document in solr using solrj library? I keep getting this error back: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.**impl.HttpSolrServer$**RemoteSolrException: Atomic document updates are not supported unless updateLog/ is configured I don't want to do partial updates, I just want to replace it... Replacing a document is done by simply adding the document, in the same way as if you were adding a new one. If you have properly configured Solr, the old one will be deleted before the new one is inserted. Properly configuring Solr means that you have a uniqueKey field in yourschema, and that it is a simple type like string, int, long, etc, and is not multivalued. A TextField type that is tokenized cannot be used as the uniqueKey field. Thanks, Shawn
Re: SOLRJ replace document
On 10/18/2013 3:36 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: My schema is pretty simple and has a string field called solr_id as my unique key. Once I get back to my computer I'll send some more details. If you are trying to use a Map object as the value of a field, that is probably why it is interpreting your add request as an atomic update. If this is the case, and you're doing it because you have a multivalued field, you can use a List object rather than a Map. If this doesn't sound like what's going on, can you share your code, or a simplification of the SolrJ parts of it? Thanks, Shawn
Re: SOLRJ replace document
So I think the issue might be related to the tech stack we're using which is SOLR within DataStax enterprise which doesn't support atomic updates. But I think it must have some sort of bug around this because it doesn't appear to work correctly for this use case when using solrj ... Anyways, I've contacted support so lets see what they say. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 10/18/2013 3:36 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: My schema is pretty simple and has a string field called solr_id as my unique key. Once I get back to my computer I'll send some more details. If you are trying to use a Map object as the value of a field, that is probably why it is interpreting your add request as an atomic update. If this is the case, and you're doing it because you have a multivalued field, you can use a List object rather than a Map. If this doesn't sound like what's going on, can you share your code, or a simplification of the SolrJ parts of it? Thanks, Shawn
Re: SOLRJ replace document
Keep in mind that DataStax has a custom update handler, and as such isn't exactly a vanilla Solr implementation (even though in many ways it still is). Since updates are co-written to Cassandra and Solr you should always tread a bit carefully when slightly outside what they perceive to be norms. On Oct 18, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Brent Ryan brent.r...@gmail.com wrote: So I think the issue might be related to the tech stack we're using which is SOLR within DataStax enterprise which doesn't support atomic updates. But I think it must have some sort of bug around this because it doesn't appear to work correctly for this use case when using solrj ... Anyways, I've contacted support so lets see what they say. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 10/18/2013 3:36 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: My schema is pretty simple and has a string field called solr_id as my unique key. Once I get back to my computer I'll send some more details. If you are trying to use a Map object as the value of a field, that is probably why it is interpreting your add request as an atomic update. If this is the case, and you're doing it because you have a multivalued field, you can use a List object rather than a Map. If this doesn't sound like what's going on, can you share your code, or a simplification of the SolrJ parts of it? Thanks, Shawn
Re: SOLRJ replace document
By all means please do file a support request with DataStax, either as an official support ticket or as a question on StackOverflow. But, I do think the previous answer of avoiding the use of a Map object in your document is likely to be the solution. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Brent Ryan Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:21 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: SOLRJ replace document So I think the issue might be related to the tech stack we're using which is SOLR within DataStax enterprise which doesn't support atomic updates. But I think it must have some sort of bug around this because it doesn't appear to work correctly for this use case when using solrj ... Anyways, I've contacted support so lets see what they say. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 10/18/2013 3:36 PM, Brent Ryan wrote: My schema is pretty simple and has a string field called solr_id as my unique key. Once I get back to my computer I'll send some more details. If you are trying to use a Map object as the value of a field, that is probably why it is interpreting your add request as an atomic update. If this is the case, and you're doing it because you have a multivalued field, you can use a List object rather than a Map. If this doesn't sound like what's going on, can you share your code, or a simplification of the SolrJ parts of it? Thanks, Shawn
