Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-02 Thread Scott McDonald

Having grow up not too far away from Victorville in neighboring Antelope Valley 
(Palmdale) I can attest to number of Redneck bars that exist in both Riverside and 
Redlands.  But I digress.

Since I am a former desert rat, and can see the beauty of the desert where others see 
desolation, I have always thought that should I ever return to that environment that a 
desert garden railroad with live steam locomotives would be a natural combination.  My 
initial fascination with trains as a young'un was due in part to watching westerns 
that shouwed these magnificant locomotives thundering acrosss the desert plain, but as 
I looked out my bedroom window to the SP line a quarter mile away, I never saw a steam 
locomtive like those on t.v.  Only a red nosed diesel.  (Which explains my joy with 
the infernal combustion side of the hobby).

So let me know when youstart builind in the desert...it'll give me another excuse to 
visit my old stomping grounds (in addition to family still there).

Scott

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yep Bob,
 
 I thought that would get a response from you. To answer your question, soon
 as I can tear myself awy from the redwoods and can afford some property in
 the mountains --only a 20min drive to the nearest lake from our sand lot.
 
 Another point, good traction with all that sand and good parts business for
 the manufacturers! Victorville is growing too. But Riverside and
 S.B-ick-the only good thing I remember during my selling days about those
 towns was some Redneck bar in Riverside! or was it Redlands?
 
 Apologies to the any steamer residing in those towns--'cos you must improve
 them!
 
 Geoff
 
 
 
 In a message dated 3/1/2001 2:20:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  hi-desert property we own between
  Apple Valley (Roy Roger's museum ) and Lake Arrowhead!
 When do we start building, Geoff?
 Bob
 
 
 
 
 
--
--
Clack Valves  Cornets Steam Band - http://www.erols.com/diesel/clack/
__
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/ 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-02 Thread Geoff Spenceley


Gee,  Larry

Thanks for the kind words--AND the offer on the front garden track. Looking
forward to your railroad on April 1.--There will be photos on the internet
no doubt.

And lets see-"offers" from Bob and Scott on the desert track- This is
getting serious-almost! I shall have to drive down and see if the sand
dunes have levelled. Kidding!! The desert there is beautiful and doesn't
have the hi temps of the lower deserts. Lucerne has a redneck bar too, I
believe!

If I may deviate for a moment, we bought that property in 1967 'cos it was
right along the road between the mountains and Apple Valley and I KNEW it
was going rise incredulously in value--well it didn't--but it did nearly
everywhere else up there!!--Hey--an excursion RR-that'll make money! ?!

Sand box Spenceley.






Geoff Spenceley wrote:

 .  It's still a
 mess in my opinion and takes over the whole small backyard. But as I  tell
 visiting garden clubs, the garden only serves the railway, or is incidental
 to it.


Geoffrey, Geoffrey, Geoffrey

Your garden is not a mess. It is artistic whimsy Cassidy loves it and someday
you will find all the things she rearranged.

 Then I have that blinking 3-1/2" track encircling the house!

And great fun it is too. The videos prove it. Your smile is quite large.

  However, all in all, local GR club meets here are enjoyed

Yep!

 ( particularrly by live steamers) because of the elevated  45mm  double
 track--only 110
 feet (sob) which is elevated with a 3% grade down to the g/l.  My
 incredulous hindsight tells me that I should have put the track in the
 much bigger front garden --as Tony has done.

I keep telling you, lets do it. A little fence, and a little track and it's
done.

The trouble maker!
Larry

Don't forget Apr. 1 my house.



 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-01 Thread Joe Betsko

Tony,

My initial plan was to integrate a layout with a garden in my immediate
back yard.  Incidentally, my backyard extends another 300 ft. beyond the
tracks.  I do plan to put a more utilitarian and elevated trackage along
my right property line that will  have a reversing loop around my green
shed and another in the back woods.

I intend to grade the access to the operator's path so that it is not
like falling into a ditch as much as possible.  I would have liked to
elevated it in a way my wife would approve.  However, I have, on the
left hand side, a detached garage for which I have to allow for side
door access.  Hence, the compromise was struck for the limited
operator's path on just one side.

I have previously commented on digging into a somewhat level concrete
surface.  I tend to believe that it is the old septic tank (yuck) and
not a tomb holding treasure to pay for the Aster Allegheny.

Because of this surface, I will have to raise the roadbed by 12 to 18
inches to achieve at least a 30 inch elevation along the path.  And I
prefer for this setting a dirt-based roadbed.  Okay, it's going to be a
lot of trial and error.

Initially, I was curious whether I was the only one aside from the
author of the cited Garden Railways article to dig a hole for an
operator's pit or path?


SNIP:
Anthony Dixon wrote:
 
 Hi  Joe  and  all,
  I  agree  on  the  raised  tracks  issue.  But  also  suggest  its
 a  matter  of  "horses  for  course,s".
I  also  looked  at  the  ditch  digging  idea,s  and  wrote  them
 off  very quickly.
 But  no  two  landscapes  are  identicle,  so  maybe  there  are  reasons
 to  dig  ditches  for some
 layouts.  I  suggest  much  more  convenient  to  achieve  the  eyelevel
 view  by  building  up,  not  digging down.  Also  the  drainage
 problems  are  eliminatedBut  sometimes  to  keep  the
 rest  of  the family  happy,  the  track  should  not
 be  too  intrusive.  Also  suggest  easier  for  guests  to  step  over
 a  low track,  than  risk  falling  into  a  ditch?.
I  suggest  the  bottom  line  is  to  have  a  track  immediately
 at  hand  24  hours  a
 day,  which  suits  the  owners  pre-requisites,  and  can  still  be
 comfortably  utilised
 and  enjoyed  by  friends  and  associates.
Tony  D.
 
 At 03:48 PM 2/27/18 -0500, Jim Curry wrote:
 Joe:
 
 My layout is elevated all the way around.  With an undulating yard I vary
 from 6" to 44" off the ground with the main steaming area 24"-30" up.  No
 site work necessary!
 
 Jim
 
 

-- 
Regards,
Joe Betsko
Pennsylvania USA

Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows! 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-01 Thread Geoff Spenceley

Tony, Joe et al.--Agreed Tony!

I did seriouisly consider a "trench" system on the inside of the track at
one time but when I hit gold I quit, so now my track is  an  36"elevated
oval with a ground level track in the centerfor NG and  battery
sparkies- that has structures, miniatures. pond, bridges etc.  It's still a
mess in my opinion and takes over the whole small backyard. But as I  tell
visiting garden clubs, the garden only serves the railway, or is incidental
to it.

Then I have that blinking 3-1/2" track encircling the house!

 However, all in all, local GR club meets here are enjoyed ( particularrly
by live steamers) because of the elevated  45mm  double track--only 110
feet (sob) which is elevated with a 3% grade down to the g/l.  My
incredulous hindsight tells me that I should have put the track in the
much bigger front garden --as Tony has done. Then I would have had elevated
track on the low level which would have become  ground level close to the
house due to the grade. More track and  more compliments  to the garden.!
One advantage,  I must brag about --the present set-up is only 12 ft from
my hobby-work-mess room to the steaming spot. Good for the old folks!

At least the 3-1/2" track  (12" elevation) in the front runs through flower
beds which disguises the track somewhat.

Like Tony, from my point of view,  elevated is the best for running--but
don't do it as I did-if you want the garden and flowers to dominate.  My
wife suggests that we should build on the hi-desert property we own between
Apple Valley (Roy Roger's museum ) and Lake Arrowhead! Not worth much---but
10 acres of track?!!!-- with a house stuck somewhere in between--built as a
GWR station?--Ah Dreams!!

Geoff.


Hi  Joe  and  all,
 I  agree  on  the  raised  tracks  issue.  But  also  suggest  its
a  matter  of  "horses  for  course,s".
   I  also  looked  at  the  ditch  digging  idea,s  and  wrote  them
off  very quickly.
But  no  two  landscapes  are  identicle,  so  maybe  there  are  reasons
to  dig  ditches  for some
layouts.  I  suggest  much  more  convenient  to  achieve  the  eyelevel
view  by  building  up,  not  digging down.  Also  the  drainage
problems  are  eliminated.
  Reviewing  my  landscape  and  options
gave  me  no  choice  but  to  build
a  totally  elevated  track.  By  careful  measurements  I  found  I  could
  have  two  steaming  areas  at  36"  high  at  the  side  of  the  house,
with   18'" high  "scenic  runs"  across  the
front  of  the  house,  (and  not  to  imposing)  without  adding   or
disturbing  to  much  landscape.
  Some  guys  may  want  waist  high  tracks  for  total  length.  I
have  seen several
well  landscaped  waisthigh  tracks
also.  Including  one  track  that  goes  from
knee  high  to  an  unreachable  14' . high . But  sometimes  to  keep  the
rest  of  the family  happy,  the  track  should  not
be  too  intrusive.  Also  suggest  easier  for  guests  to  step  over
a  low track,  than  risk  falling  into  a  ditch?.
   I  suggest  the  bottom  line  is  to  have  a  track  immediately
at  hand  24  hours  a
day,  which  suits  the  owners  pre-requisites,  and  can  still  be
comfortably  utilised
and  enjoyed  by  friends  and  associates.
   Tony  D.

At 03:48 PM 2/27/18 -0500, Jim Curry wrote:
Joe:

My layout is elevated all the way around.  With an undulating yard I vary
from 6" to 44" off the ground with the main steaming area 24"-30" up.  No
site work necessary!

Jim




 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-01 Thread Cgnr

In a message dated 3/1/2001 2:20:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 hi-desert property we own between
  Apple Valley (Roy Roger's museum ) and Lake Arrowhead!
When do we start building, Geoff?
Bob
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-01 Thread Geoff Spenceley

Yep Bob,

I thought that would get a response from you. To answer your question, soon
as I can tear myself awy from the redwoods and can afford some property  in
the mountains --only a 20min drive to the nearest lake from our sand lot.

Another point, good traction with all that sand and good parts business for
the manufacturers! Victorville is growing too.  But Riverside and
S.B-ick-the only good thing I remember during my selling days about those
towns was some Redneck bar in Riverside! or was it Redlands?

Apologies to the any steamer residing in those towns--'cos you must improve
them!

Geoff



In a message dated 3/1/2001 2:20:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 hi-desert property we own between
  Apple Valley (Roy Roger's museum ) and Lake Arrowhead!
When do we start building, Geoff?
Bob



 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-01 Thread Larry Buerer



Geoff Spenceley wrote:

 .  It's still a
 mess in my opinion and takes over the whole small backyard. But as I  tell
 visiting garden clubs, the garden only serves the railway, or is incidental
 to it.


Geoffrey, Geoffrey, Geoffrey

Your garden is not a mess. It is artistic whimsy Cassidy loves it and someday
you will find all the things she rearranged.

 Then I have that blinking 3-1/2" track encircling the house!

And great fun it is too. The videos prove it. Your smile is quite large.

  However, all in all, local GR club meets here are enjoyed

Yep!

 ( particularrly by live steamers) because of the elevated  45mm  double
 track--only 110
 feet (sob) which is elevated with a 3% grade down to the g/l.  My
 incredulous hindsight tells me that I should have put the track in the
 much bigger front garden --as Tony has done.

I keep telling you, lets do it. A little fence, and a little track and it's
done.

The trouble maker!
Larry

Don't forget Apr. 1 my house.
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-03-01 Thread Anthony Dixon

Hi  Joe,
   Amazing  co-incidences  between  the  problems  and  solutions  we 
both appear to  have.  i.e.  raising  roadbed  18"  to  achieve 
a  30"  elevation  against  a  path.
   I  worked the  problem  from opposite  direction.  I 
did  not  want  track  at  ground level  in  front of  house  or  3' 
high  either.  So  compromise  was  18"  in  front  of  house, 
and  36"  at  the  side  of the  house for  steamup  bays.
  Dirt  based roadbed:-  Initially  60%  of my  track 
was  sitting  on  a  dirt  based   roadbed.  But  the  last  40%  needed 
to  be  on  a  wood  trestle structure.  I  found 
myself  spending  more  time  releveling  the  dirt  roadbed  than 
completing rest  of  the  track.
  So  cleared  all  the  dirt  roadbed  out,  and  rebuilt  up  on  1" 
plywood  sheeting, (sitting  on  5" x  3"  redwood  decking), 
covered  in  3/16"  felt  and 
overlaid  with  1"  square  redwood  spars  for  track  base.
  After  300feet,  and almost  three  rebuilds,  when  time  came 
time  to  join  up  both  ends,  track  height  variance  was  less  than 
1/4"..
  At  the  moment  50%  is  double  track,  the 
rest  single.  Makes  for  interesting  track  control  with  guests.  But 
a  complete  double  track  is in  the  works.  (And 
I  have  permission  from  the  supervisor   of  tracks and  gardens!).
 I  took  almost  2 years  to  complete  my track,  working 
weekends  only.  So  you will  have 
plenty  of  time  for  contemplating  options.
  Keep us  all  appraised.
  Tony  D.

IAt 06:51 AM 3/1/01 -0500, Joe Betsko wrote:
Tony,

My initial plan was to integrate a layout with a garden in my immediate
back yard.  Incidentally, my backyard extends another 300 ft. beyond the
tracks.  I do plan to put a more utilitarian and elevated trackage along
my right property line that will  have a reversing loop around my green
shed and another in the back woods.

I intend to grade the access to the operator's path so that it is not
like falling into a ditch as much as possible.  I would have liked to
elevated it in a way my wife would approve.  However, I have, on the
left hand side, a detached garage for which I have to allow for side
door access.  Hence, the compromise was struck for the limited
operator's path on just one side.

I have previously commented on digging into a somewhat level concrete
surface.  I tend to believe that it is the old septic tank (yuck) and
not a tomb holding treasure to pay for the Aster Allegheny.

Because of this surface, I will have to raise the roadbed by 12 to 18
inches to achieve at least a 30 inch elevation along the path.  And I
prefer for this setting a dirt-based roadbed.  Okay, it's going to be a
lot of trial and error.

Initially, I was curious whether I was the only one aside from the
author of the cited Garden Railways article to dig a hole for an
operator's pit or path?


SNIP:
Anthony Dixon wrote:
 
  Hi  Joe  and  all,
   I  agree  on  the  raised  tracks  issue.  But  also  suggest  its
  a  matter  of  "horses  for  course,s".
 I  also  looked  at  the  ditch  digging  idea,s  and  wrote  them
  off  very quickly.
  But  no  two  landscapes  are  identicle,  so  maybe  there  are  reasons
  to  dig  ditches  for some
  layouts.  I  suggest  much  more  convenient  to  achieve  the  eyelevel
  view  by  building  up,  not  digging down.  Also  the  drainage
  problems  are  eliminatedBut  sometimes  to  keep  the
  rest  of  the family  happy,  the  track  should  not
  be  too  intrusive.  Also  suggest  easier  for  guests  to  step  over
  a  low track,  than  risk  falling  into  a  ditch?.
 I  suggest  the  bottom  line  is  to  have  a  track  immediately
  at  hand  24  hours  a
  day,  which  suits  the  owners  pre-requisites,  and  can  still  be
  comfortably  utilised
  and  enjoyed  by  friends  and  associates.
 Tony  D.
 
  At 03:48 PM 2/27/18 -0500, Jim Curry wrote:
  Joe:
  
  My layout is elevated all the way around.  With an undulating yard I vary
  from 6" to 44" off the ground with the main steaming area 24"-30" up.  No
  site work necessary!
  
  Jim
  
 

--
Regards,
Joe Betsko
Pennsylvania USA

Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

iMac - Hey, I don't do windows!
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-28 Thread Joe Betsko

Mike,

I believe that there is some sort of coating on the Aristo-Craft track,
possibly to improve conductivity or to distinguish it from LGB's.  The
A-C brass track takes forever to weather.  I have had the track for
almost a year outside.  I could take a green 3M pad and scrub off the
coating to expedite the weathing process.  I would do this on a test
section.  On the other hand, my LGB track is nicely weathered.

I went with the A-C track because it was ready-to-use and inexpensive. 
Oh well...

"M. Paterson" wrote:
 
 Joe, recommend that you do not paint the rails. The
 brass will weather in (about 6 months here in CA)and
 turn a dark brown.  Painting, I found causes numerous
 problems down the line because you either never full
 remove the tape residue or the paint flakes or both. I
 have painted al rail and unpainted brass, all code
 320.
 The Al rail (Micro Engineering) is hand spiked in
 redwood home made ties, the brass (LGB)is in plastic.
 All rail is bent on site.
 mike
 
 --- Joe Betsko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Charles and List,
 
  This page shows some of the progress I made today
  http://www.gardensteamers.com/track_install.html
  Right now, I have a
  level point to point set up and it's great to be
  steaming in the meantime!
 
  Charles, a drain pipe would eventually surface on my
  property after
  trenching about another 15 feet or otherwise it's
  "Steam in the Pond"
  for me!  Or I could put in a pipe with holes - not
  sure of the exact
  term at the moment...
 
  I like the mat suggestion.  Thanks!
 
  Charles Brumbelow wrote:
  
   Drainage to what?  Sump pump?  Or are you on a
  slope where the drain pipe
   would eventually surface?  I suggest something
  removable to keep the feet
   off the concrete(?) floor.  Door mats made of
  recycled tires is a
   possiblilty which comes to mind.  And something to
  keep the butt off the
   concrete wall  . . .  Just a couple of thoughts .
  . .  Charles
  
 
  --
  Regards,
  Joe Betsko
  Pennsylvania USA
 
  Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
  Primer for Novice Live Steamers:
  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
  Share Live Steaming Tips:
  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html
 
  iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows!
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

-- 
Regards,
Joe Betsko
Pennsylvania USA

Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows! 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-28 Thread trotfox

The Aristo track is a different alloy of brass than the LGB stuff.  It
simply corrodes slower.  The Aristo alloy has more copper and conducts
better.  Seems it would oxidize faster that way, but it doesn't.  :)

Trot, the fox who plays with too many sparkies...  ;]

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Joe Betsko wrote:

 Mike,
 
 I believe that there is some sort of coating on the Aristo-Craft track,
 possibly to improve conductivity or to distinguish it from LGB's.  The
 A-C brass track takes forever to weather.  I have had the track for
 almost a year outside.  I could take a green 3M pad and scrub off the
 coating to expedite the weathing process.  I would do this on a test
 section.  On the other hand, my LGB track is nicely weathered.
 
 I went with the A-C track because it was ready-to-use and inexpensive. 
 Oh well...


 /\_/\TrotFox\ Always remember,  
( o o )  AKA Landon Solomon   \ "There is a 
 \./ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ third alternative."
 



RE: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-28 Thread Charles W. Walters

Joe,

Looking good so far!  And you are right about the Aristo track.  Same thing
with me.  Takes a 100 yrs to darken compared to LGB!

Chuck Walters - President
Central New York Large Scale Railway Society
http://home.twcny.rr.com/cnylsrs

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Joe Betsko
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:13 PM
To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam
Subject: Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit


Charles and List,

This page shows some of the progress I made today
http://www.gardensteamers.com/track_install.html  Right now, I have a
level point to point set up and it's great to be steaming in the meantime!

Charles, a drain pipe would eventually surface on my property after
trenching about another 15 feet or otherwise it's "Steam in the Pond"
for me!  Or I could put in a pipe with holes - not sure of the exact
term at the moment...

I like the mat suggestion.  Thanks!

Charles Brumbelow wrote:

 Drainage to what?  Sump pump?  Or are you on a slope where the drain pipe
 would eventually surface?  I suggest something removable to keep the feet
 off the concrete(?) floor.  Door mats made of recycled tires is a
 possiblilty which comes to mind.  And something to keep the butt off the
 concrete wall  . . .  Just a couple of thoughts . . .  Charles


--
Regards,
Joe Betsko
Pennsylvania USA

Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows!
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-28 Thread Charles Brumbelow

Interesting . . .  If that's a ladder on the left instead of wide-gauge
track BG you have quite a nice space.  As for the concrete in the pit,
can you slide the hole to the right a bit and make the concrete part of a
step down?  Charles

- Original Message -
From: "Joe Betsko" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This page shows some of the progress I made today
 http://www.gardensteamers.com/track_install.html  Right now, I have a
 level point to point set up and it's great to be steaming in the meantime!


 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-28 Thread Vidmanrog

I play with sparkies also, and I have Aristo track that has been out in the 
snow, rain, mud  and hot sun for over seven years an it hasn't weathered yet.

Roger WPW 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-28 Thread Anthony Dixon

Hi  Joe  and  all,
 I  agree  on  the  raised  tracks  issue.  But  also  suggest  its 
a  matter  of  "horses  for  course,s".
   I  also  looked  at  the  ditch  digging  idea,s  and  wrote  them 
off  very quickly.
But  no  two  landscapes  are  identicle,  so  maybe  there  are  reasons 
to  dig  ditches  for some 
layouts.  I  suggest  much  more  convenient  to  achieve  the  eyelevel 
view  by  building  up,  not  digging down.  Also  the  drainage 
problems  are  eliminated.
  Reviewing  my  landscape  and  options 
gave  me  no  choice  but  to  build 
a  totally  elevated  track.  By  careful  measurements  I  found  I  could 
  have  two  steaming  areas  at  36"  high  at  the  side  of  the  house, 
with   18'" high  "scenic  runs"  across  the
front  of  the  house,  (and  not  to  imposing)  without  adding   or 
disturbing  to  much  landscape.
  Some  guys  may  want  waist  high  tracks  for  total  length.  I 
have  seen several
well  landscaped  waisthigh  tracks 
also.  Including  one  track  that  goes  from 
knee  high  to  an  unreachable  14' . high . But  sometimes  to  keep  the 
rest  of  the family  happy,  the  track  should  not 
be  too  intrusive.  Also  suggest  easier  for  guests  to  step  over 
a  low track,  than  risk  falling  into  a  ditch?.
   I  suggest  the  bottom  line  is  to  have  a  track  immediately 
at  hand  24  hours  a 
day,  which  suits  the  owners  pre-requisites,  and  can  still  be 
comfortably  utilised
and  enjoyed  by  friends  and  associates.
   Tony  D.

At 03:48 PM 2/27/18 -0500, Jim Curry wrote:
Joe:

My layout is elevated all the way around.  With an undulating yard I vary
from 6" to 44" off the ground with the main steaming area 24"-30" up.  No
site work necessary!

Jim

 



Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread Joe Betsko

Fellow steamers,

I am in the middle of digging a trench along my straight away.  So far,
the pit measures 4 ft by 4 ft by 15 inches.

I plan to build an operator's pit/path to fiddle with those manual locos
along the lines of 4 ft wide and 12 to 15 ft long (depending on my
back).  My concern is about the height for comfortable access to the
manual loco along the pit path.   24 inches?  30 inches?  36 inches?  I
am leaning toward 30 inches...thus raising the roadbed by 15 inches.

Has anyone else done this on the list?  If I could do this the whole way
around, there would be a turtle back effect in the middle.

Has anyone bothered to put in PVC piping for drainage?
-- 
Regards,
Joe Betsko
Pennsylvania USA

Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows! 



My thoughts regarding Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread Gary Lane

Personally, I have often thought it would be far easier to dig a trench to
allow operators or audience to see the train layout from a more eye level
than to cart in endless wheelbarrows of fill to raise all the landscape
except a path. When I was considering making a trench I liked the idea of
draining the trench with a sock covered drain pipe (sloped of course
downhill) with a French style gravel fill around the pipe to encourage
drainage and to keep the trench area dry for walking.
http://www.drainpro.com/french.htmFrench drain system construction
http://www.insync.net/~zwater/frenchdrn.htm  French drain system
http://www.varicore.com/  A multiple smaller pipe drain system
http://www.homeimages.com/wwwboard/messages/1429.html message board
discussion about drain fields
Hope something out of this helps!

Garden Railways magazine recently had an article about a fellow who did make
a cement pit for legs and fanny while steaming up.

I got lucky, I have a section of yard that slopes steeply. This section has
a trestle. The trestle is 70' long permitting people to fiddle with trains
at any height they find comfortable between ground level and 8' high.
http://www.angelfire.com/or/trainguy/photos of  the trestle made instead
of ditching to permit easy access to trains for any height of visitor.
~Gary of Eugene, Oregon

- Original Message -
From: "Joe Betsko" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Multiple recipients of sslivesteam" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 7:31 AM
Subject: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit


 Fellow steamers,

 I am in the middle of digging a trench along my straight away.  So far,
 the pit measures 4 ft by 4 ft by 15 inches.

 I plan to build an operator's pit/path to fiddle with those manual locos
 along the lines of 4 ft wide and 12 to 15 ft long (depending on my
 back).  My concern is about the height for comfortable access to the
 manual loco along the pit path.   24 inches?  30 inches?  36 inches?  I
 am leaning toward 30 inches...thus raising the roadbed by 15 inches.

 Has anyone else done this on the list?  If I could do this the whole way
 around, there would be a turtle back effect in the middle.

 Has anyone bothered to put in PVC piping for drainage?
 --
 Regards,
 Joe Betsko
 Pennsylvania USA

 Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
 Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
 Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

 iMac - Hey, I don't do windows!
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Curry

Joe:

If you're looking for stand-up access 4' would be pretty comfy.  If you're
going to have a seat 30" is fine, that's what I use on my layout.

As far as all the trench work is concerned, this may be the excuse you've
been looking for for that small John Deere with a backhoe(mower,
snowthrower)

Jim
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread ErnieW

Joe-

There's an article in a recent Garden Railways about constructing an 
operator's pit somewhat like you describe, and it shows how to determine a 
suitable depth. It assumes that the pit will be used by one operator. From 
what I've seen, you'd be much better off with most of your track elevated to 
give good access, just like you've experienced at PLS, rather than using a 
pit.

Drainage is essential, as Phil identifies. Also remember that drainage pipes 
must lead to a place where the rainwater will disperse harmlessly.

ErnieW in SE PA 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Curry

Joe:

My layout is elevated all the way around.  With an undulating yard I vary
from 6" to 44" off the ground with the main steaming area 24"-30" up.  No
site work necessary!

Jim
 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread Charles Brumbelow

Drainage to what?  Sump pump?  Or are you on a slope where the drain pipe
would eventually surface?  I suggest something removable to keep the feet
off the concrete(?) floor.  Door mats made of recycled tires is a
possiblilty which comes to mind.  And something to keep the butt off the
concrete wall  . . .  Just a couple of thoughts . . .  Charles

- Original Message -
From: "Joe Betsko" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Fellow steamers,

 I am in the middle of digging a trench along my straight away.  So far,
 the pit measures 4 ft by 4 ft by 15 inches.

 I plan to build an operator's pit/path to fiddle with those manual locos
 along the lines of 4 ft wide and 12 to 15 ft long (depending on my
 back).  My concern is about the height for comfortable access to the
 manual loco along the pit path.   24 inches?  30 inches?  36 inches?  I
 am leaning toward 30 inches...thus raising the roadbed by 15 inches.

 Has anyone else done this on the list?  If I could do this the whole way
 around, there would be a turtle back effect in the middle.

 Has anyone bothered to put in PVC piping for drainage?

 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread Joe Betsko

Charles and List,

This page shows some of the progress I made today 
http://www.gardensteamers.com/track_install.html  Right now, I have a
level point to point set up and it's great to be steaming in the meantime!

Charles, a drain pipe would eventually surface on my property after
trenching about another 15 feet or otherwise it's "Steam in the Pond"
for me!  Or I could put in a pipe with holes - not sure of the exact
term at the moment... 

I like the mat suggestion.  Thanks!

Charles Brumbelow wrote:
 
 Drainage to what?  Sump pump?  Or are you on a slope where the drain pipe
 would eventually surface?  I suggest something removable to keep the feet
 off the concrete(?) floor.  Door mats made of recycled tires is a
 possiblilty which comes to mind.  And something to keep the butt off the
 concrete wall  . . .  Just a couple of thoughts . . .  Charles
 

-- 
Regards,
Joe Betsko
Pennsylvania USA

Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
Primer for Novice Live Steamers:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
Share Live Steaming Tips:  http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html

iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows! 



Re: Track Roadbed and Operating Pit

2001-02-27 Thread M. Paterson

Joe, recommend that you do not paint the rails. The
brass will weather in (about 6 months here in CA)and
turn a dark brown.  Painting, I found causes numerous
problems down the line because you either never full
remove the tape residue or the paint flakes or both. I
have painted al rail and unpainted brass, all code
320.
The Al rail (Micro Engineering) is hand spiked in
redwood home made ties, the brass (LGB)is in plastic.
All rail is bent on site.
mike

--- Joe Betsko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Charles and List,
 
 This page shows some of the progress I made today 
 http://www.gardensteamers.com/track_install.html 
 Right now, I have a
 level point to point set up and it's great to be
 steaming in the meantime!
 
 Charles, a drain pipe would eventually surface on my
 property after
 trenching about another 15 feet or otherwise it's
 "Steam in the Pond"
 for me!  Or I could put in a pipe with holes - not
 sure of the exact
 term at the moment... 
 
 I like the mat suggestion.  Thanks!
 
 Charles Brumbelow wrote:
  
  Drainage to what?  Sump pump?  Or are you on a
 slope where the drain pipe
  would eventually surface?  I suggest something
 removable to keep the feet
  off the concrete(?) floor.  Door mats made of
 recycled tires is a
  possiblilty which comes to mind.  And something to
 keep the butt off the
  concrete wall  . . .  Just a couple of thoughts .
 . .  Charles
  
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Joe Betsko
 Pennsylvania USA
 
 Bala Cynwyd Railway:  http://jsb.pennsy.home.att.net
 Primer for Novice Live Steamers: 
 http://www.gardensteamers.com/tips.html
 Share Live Steaming Tips: 
 http://www.gardensteamers.com/exchange.html
 
 iMac - Hey, I don’t do windows! 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/