Re: Tag as an attribute

[Nicolas De Loof]

JSP Tags use a XML style syntax, so you can't use a tag as attribute of
another tag.



Nico.

>  name="myImage"/>"/>
>
> I am getting an error. What's the way to achieve this without using a
> scriptlet? I have a temporary fix:
>
> <% String image=(String)pageContext.getAttribute("myImage",
> pageContext.APPLICATION_SCOPE) ; %>
> 
>
> Thanks,
> Suresh
>
>






> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Tag as an attribute

[olivier]

Suresh,
Including a tag inside another tag is not permitted. Its not a Struts
problem but an XML parsing limitation.
You might want to try either JSTL or Struts-EL. Dunno Struts-EL but JSTL
works fine.
Your code would become something like :


more on JSTL : http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/jstl/

c u,
olivier


-Message d'origine-
De : Suresh Addagalla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoye : vendredi 24 janvier 2003 08:11
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Tag as an attribute


Hi,

Is the following a valid struts tag?

"/>

I am getting an error. What's the way to achieve this without using a
scriptlet? I have a temporary fix:

<% String image=(String)pageContext.getAttribute("myImage",
pageContext.APPLICATION_SCOPE) ; %>


Thanks,
Suresh



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Tag as an attribute

[Suresh Addagalla]

Hi,

Is the following a valid struts tag?

"/>

I am getting an error. What's the way to achieve this without using a
scriptlet? I have a temporary fix:

<% String image=(String)pageContext.getAttribute("myImage",
pageContext.APPLICATION_SCOPE) ; %>


Thanks,
Suresh


**Disclaimer

Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 
'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying 
or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner 
whatsoever is strictly prohibited.

***


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Problem in Action Class

[Uday]

Hi,

I have one action class which extends org.apache.struts.action.Action.
I have one more action class and its ActionForm class.
>From the first action class i want to invoke method of second ActionForm
class.
How do i get the reference of second ActionForm class from the first Action
class.


Have a nice day

Regards,
Uday


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Scaffold documentation

[Ken McCloskey]

I've tried searching for Scaffold information on both www.mail-archive.com, 
jakarta.apache.org and Google/Google Groups. Unfortunately I've not been 
able to find much. The husted.com links are no longer valid.

What is Scaffold and where is the documentation for it? Has it been folded 
into the Struts 1.1 source code or does it exist separately? Does the lack 
of information about it indicate that it is no longer a living project?

Thanks,
Ken




_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Need help with html:select and html:options

[Suresh Addagalla]

Check if you have month & day properties defined in your form bean.

Suresh

>-Original Message-
>From: Scott Seong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:32 AM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: Need help with html:select and html:options
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I'm having trouble with html:select and html:options. Basically, I have
>three select/options pairs in a JSP page, and the result is complaining
>about "No getter method available for Property month for bean 
>name under
>org.apache...". Here is the code sample:
>
><%
>Vector states = new Vector();
>
>states.add(new LabelValueBean("Alabama", "AL"));
>
>states.add(new LabelValueBean("Alaska", "AK"));
>
>...
>
>pageContext.setAttribute( "states", states);
>
>Vector months = new Vector();
>
>months.add(new LabelValueBean("Month", "00"));
>
>months.add(new LabelValueBean("January", "01"));
>
>...
>
>pageContext.setAttribute( "months", months);
>
>
>
>Vector days = new Vector();
>
>days.add(new LabelValueBean("Day", "00"));
>
>days.add(new LabelValueBean("1", "01"));
>
>...
>
>pageContext.setAttribute( "days", days);
>
>%>
>
>
>Then, I have html:select and html:options tags as shown below:
>
>
>labelProperty="label" />
>
>
>
>
>
>labelProperty="mLabel"
>/>
>
>
>
>
>
>labelProperty="dLabel" />
>
>
>
>
>
>The JSP chokes at the 2nd select/options, and I don't know 
>why. If I remove
>2nd and third pair, the JSP seems to work fine. Can someone help?
>
>Thanks,
>Scott
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For 
>additional commands, 
>e-mail: 
>


**Disclaimer** 
   
 
 Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 
'privileged' 
and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it 
is 
addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information 
contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Need help with html:select and html:options

[Scott Seong]

Hello,

I'm having trouble with html:select and html:options. Basically, I have
three select/options pairs in a JSP page, and the result is complaining
about "No getter method available for Property month for bean name under
org.apache...". Here is the code sample:

<%
Vector states = new Vector();

states.add(new LabelValueBean("Alabama", "AL"));

states.add(new LabelValueBean("Alaska", "AK"));

...

pageContext.setAttribute( "states", states);

Vector months = new Vector();

months.add(new LabelValueBean("Month", "00"));

months.add(new LabelValueBean("January", "01"));

...

pageContext.setAttribute( "months", months);



Vector days = new Vector();

days.add(new LabelValueBean("Day", "00"));

days.add(new LabelValueBean("1", "01"));

...

pageContext.setAttribute( "days", days);

%>


Then, I have html:select and html:options tags as shown below:




















The JSP chokes at the 2nd select/options, and I don't know why. If I remove
2nd and third pair, the JSP seems to work fine. Can someone help?

Thanks,
Scott




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: ActionFilter and detecting a forward

[Craig R. McClanahan]

On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Max Cooper wrote:

>
> Forwards are be subject to filtering, too. That is to say, when you forward,
> your request might go through some filters.

If you're talking about Servlet filters (i.e. javax.filter.Filter), this
is not true in a Servlet 2.3 container.  In Servlet 2.4, you'll have the
option to say you want a filter applied on request dispatcher calls also.

> But I am not sure your filter
> will be invoked if your "mainMenu" forward has a path that doesn't match the
> filter's url-pattern. There also seems to be some inconsistency between the
> containers about what request.getRequestURL() will return when you forward.
> Some will return the URL of the original request, others return the URL of
> the resource you forwarded to.
>

A container that does not return the forwarded-to URL is broken.  The
servlet spec requires this behavior.

You'll see the original URL on an include, however; the included URL is
available as a request attribute.

> It is unclear to me why a filter is involved with this. Why should the
> filter be responsible for populating the list if you only want to populate
> the list for a particular forward? If it is just for the one forward, it
> seems natural to put the list populating stuff in the thing you are
> forwarding to. Your forward can be to a Struts action that populates the
> list and then itself forwards to a JSP or something to display it.
>
> -Max

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: ActionFilter and detecting a forward

[Max Cooper]

Forwards are be subject to filtering, too. That is to say, when you forward,
your request might go through some filters. But I am not sure your filter
will be invoked if your "mainMenu" forward has a path that doesn't match the
filter's url-pattern. There also seems to be some inconsistency between the
containers about what request.getRequestURL() will return when you forward.
Some will return the URL of the original request, others return the URL of
the resource you forwarded to.

It is unclear to me why a filter is involved with this. Why should the
filter be responsible for populating the list if you only want to populate
the list for a particular forward? If it is just for the one forward, it
seems natural to put the list populating stuff in the thing you are
forwarding to. Your forward can be to a Struts action that populates the
list and then itself forwards to a JSP or something to display it.

-Max

- Original Message -
From: "Raible, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:28 PM
Subject: ActionFilter and detecting a forward


> I have an ActionFilter that is applied to all my /do/* requests.  I want
to
> populate a list of data, but only when the user goes to my "mainMenu"
> forward.  What is the best way to detect that they are going here.  I
tried
> request.getRequestURL, but that doesn't do me any good, cause sometimes
that
> will be things like "/do/saveUser".
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: ActionFilter and detecting a forward

[V. Cekvenich]

http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg42455.html
See above how to store context and action change of prior action, it 
might help.
.V


Raible, Matt wrote:
I have an ActionFilter that is applied to all my /do/* requests.  I want to
populate a list of data, but only when the user goes to my "mainMenu"
forward.  What is the best way to detect that they are going here.  I tried
request.getRequestURL, but that doesn't do me any good, cause sometimes that
will be things like "/do/saveUser".

Thanks,

Matt




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

ActionFilter and detecting a forward

[Raible, Matt]

I have an ActionFilter that is applied to all my /do/* requests.  I want to
populate a list of data, but only when the user goes to my "mainMenu"
forward.  What is the best way to detect that they are going here.  I tried
request.getRequestURL, but that doesn't do me any good, cause sometimes that
will be things like "/do/saveUser".

Thanks,

Matt


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Joe Barefoot]

We use Struts for a full-blown "inward-facing" web application, and it works great in 
all respects.  Last time I checked, we had over 700 classes in our web tier alone 
(Actions, ActionForms, helpers, tags, etc.), and over 600 JSPs.  I don't even want to 
think about what a cluster-f$%k that would be without Struts.  We have had less 
problems with Struts than pretty much any other layer/technology/software we employ, 
and that includes Tomcat and JBoss.

If you find a better web MVC model, by all means use itand tell me about it!

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> > Estimate the cost of doing 
> > it yourself and 
> > present the numbers to management.
> > 
> 
> The problem is "we've already got one, you see..."  However, 
> it pretty much sucks compared to Struts and would cost 
> millions of dollars just to get it where Struts is right now 
> -- and we'd never really get it to that point anyway.  It's 
> not been very difficult to make that case.  It's just a 
> matter of whether the guys w/ the cash will see it the way we 
> do.  I think it's all a moot point right now b/c the decision 
> has all but been made.  I get the feeling I'll not be leaving 
> this list anytime soon...
> 
> Greg
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [WORKAROUND] Change webroot with easy struts + tomcat sysdeo

[alexj]

Hi Emmanuel,

I just one more question about your *fix* for the defaultroot.
After I have update the easystruts plug in file and restart eclipse,
can I delete the defaultroolt created before I update the config
file or may I have to don't care anymore about the defaultroot
folder ?

Thanks 'Manu.

<--
Alexandre Jaquet
->
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d+ s: a-- C U*+ P L--- E--- W+++ N+++ o K w+
O M-- V-- PS+++ PE+++ Y+++ PGP--- 5-- X R* tv b DI--- D
G++ e* h++ r% y*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--

- Original Message -
From: "Emmanuel Boudrant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:46 AM
Subject: [WORKAROUND] Change webroot with easy struts + tomcat sysdeo


> Hi, Thanx !
>
> I just post on my blogs a workaround for changing web root with Easy
Struts 0.6.2 (it's not smart
> but in waiting a new release...;)
>
> http://blogs.application-servers.com/blogs/page/eboudrant/Weblog/20030122
>
> I hope it's work !
>
> -emmanuel
>
>
>  --- Softwareentwicklung Hauschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit : > Yes, he sure did a
> great job !
> >
> > Ich wünsche Ihnen noch einen schönen Tag,
> > Fred Robert Hauschel
> >
> > _
> >
> > Softwareentwicklung Hauschel
> > Fred Robert Hauschel
> >
> > http://www.hauschel.de
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > 0179 - 69 170 92
> > 07427 - 9 11 79
> > _
> >
> >
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Haseltine, Celeste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Januar 2003 17:45
> > An: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Betreff: RE: about easy struts
> >
> >
> > Emmanuel,
> >
> > I think you've done a great job with the plug in so far.  We use it, and
for
> > the most part, we have had no problems with it.
> >
> > Celeste
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:33 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: about easy struts
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a few word about Easy Struts. This plugin is open source (I'm not
> > sponsorised for it).
> > Actually I have no time for update it (since november 2002) because I'm
very
> > busy with my real
> > (struts related) work. The actual version is not finish, there is a lot
of
> > bugs, some features are
> > not implemented. So be patient ;)
> >
> > I will look soon all bugs posted on
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/easystruts and release a new
> > version with some major bugs fix.
> >
> > ...I just want to say now that any contribution are welcomes.
> >
> > Thanx for people who use Easy Struts,
> > -emmanuel
> > http://easystruts.sf.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  --- alexj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > You didn't have any trouble ?
> > Please have a look of my
> > previous post
> > > about easy struts. Maybe you can see what's wrong.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > <--
> > > Alexandre Jaquet
> > > ->
> > > -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
> > > Version: 3.12
> > > GCM d+ s: a-- C U*+ P L--- E--- W+++ N+++ o K w+
> > > O M-- V-- PS+++ PE+++ Y+++ PGP--- 5-- X R* tv b DI---
D
> > > G++ e* h++ r% y*
> > > --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Haseltine, Celeste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:50 PM
> > > Subject: RE: easy struts
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, we use both EasyStruts and Eclipse in our current project.  We
are
> > > using Struts version 1.02
> > >
> > > Celeste
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Softwareentwicklung Hauschel
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:20 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: easy struts
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey all,
> > > does anybody develop with easy struts and eclipse ?
> > >
> > > Ich wünsche Ihnen noch einen schönen Tag,
> > > Fred Robert Hauschel
> > >
> > > _
> > >
> > > Softwareentwicklung Hauschel
> > > Fred Robert Hauschel
> > >
> > > http://www.hauschel.de
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > 0179 - 69 170 92
> > > 07427 - 9 11 79
> > > _
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > 
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
> > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > 
> > For

Multiple struts-config files

[Alvarado, Juan (c)]

Folks:

I am trying to take advantage of using multiple configuration files and I
can't get past this simple step. -- Below is a snippet of web.xml


action
 
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet

config
 
/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml


config/marketbreaks
 
/WEB-INF/struts-marketbreaks-config.xml


debug
2


detail
2


validate
true

2
  


I am purposely breaking the syntax on struts-marketbreaks-config.xml so that
Tomcat will complain when it tries to load it, and that isn't happening. So
basically I am assuming that the struts-marketbreaks-config.xml is not even
being picked up by struts. Even if it does, then I have a problem with 

Access Rights where
accessrights is a global forward in struts-marketbreaks-config.xml






and I get this error when I go to the page:

javax.servlet.ServletException: Cannot create rewrite URL:
java.net.MalformedURLException: Cannot retrive ActionForward named
accessrights 

It appears that the index.jsp which is trying to use the regular
struts-config.xml and not the one for the module it is in.


If anyone can pitch in on this I'd appreciate it.






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [OT] web site idea (was Value of Struts)

[V. Cekvenich]

-1.

My philosophy is under promise over deliver.
If you put this on a site, than someone's mileage may vary.
Then when you get on a client's site it will be "how come we didn't have 
 xyz here?"

.V

Robert McIntosh wrote:
I read everyone's responses to Gene Campbell's question and I think 
there should be a place on the Struts website (maybe a wiki or 
something?) where all of these good folks who responded to him could put 
 up their "Why I love Struts" comments. I know I have to answer this 
question often to clients and other developers and it would be nice to 
say "Go to the struts website and look at page 'Why I love it'" or 
whatever.

Promoting Struts is often difficult since it is open source and there is 
that fear amongst the management (generally) about open source stuff. 
Never mind that there are 5 (6?) books on struts alone, it has one of 
the largest followings in open source Java, is in production is some 
major companies, etc. The one thing I usually say to a manager type is 
"IBM uses it for the admin on WebSphere". Throwing in that big name 
usually helps...

My .02

Robert McIntosh



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

sematic validation

[John . E . Gregg]

Hi all.
 
I love the ability of Struts to perform syntactic validation of input data
and automatically redisplay the screen + data + error messages.  However,
I'm reluctant to put semantic validation checks anywhere but the business
objects to which they belong.  For example, I have a rule that says an
organization's effective date cannot be in the future.  I consider that part
of what it means to be an organization in my domain, therefore logical
places to enforce the rule are either the appropriate setter or a
preCommit() persistence callback method.  However, when using something like
BeanUtils to copy values from my value objects to my persistent domain
objects, if an exception is thrown in the setter (or even later at commit()
time), what's the best way to propagate that back to the user?  BeanUtils
will throw an exception as soon as the underlying setter throws one,
regardless of whether there are further semantic validations (on other
properties) to perform.  I'd like it to appear to the user the same way as
when the Struts validator flags a problem.
 
thanks
 
john gregg
Wells Fargo Services Company
Minneapolis, MN
 

Deploy an Struts app

[alexj]

Hi,

I does anybody know a good plug in to help deployement of Struts app with 
Eclipse ? I have make an app with easy struts + lomboz but I can't figure
how to deploy them on Tomcat without making my own ant script.

Thanks

<--
Alexandre Jaquet
->
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d+ s: a-- C U*+ P L--- E--- W+++ N+++ o K w+ 
O M-- V-- PS+++ PE+++ Y+++ PGP--- 5-- X R* tv b DI--- D 
G++ e* h++ r% y* 
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Packaging struts business logic and action classes

[Marco Tedone]

DTO are presentation of business objects. Let's say that your client needs
to retrieve some data from a Customer's table. The table resides in a
relational database. A business object could be a class composed of state
and behaviours on your Customer's table. For istance it could provide all
the get/set methods and other business methods related to the Customer's
table(i.e. update customer's info, retrieve customer's info and so on). The
final result of a Customer's Business Object execution shall be to create an
object with the relevant information, in other words the object being
informed is the DTO. DTO will not have any business method in it, it
represent a course grained whole of the Customer's info. Then, the view
components, could use totally or partially the DTO to display info to the
client(in the presentation lyer).

If I could suggest an approach, you shouldn't spend too much time in
undestanding the 'words' but more likely the 'concepts'. Let's say that in a
web application there are different lyers: for sure you will have
presentation, business and probally data lyers. The bibliography suggests
that your application(in this case your Struts application) shall decouple
the presentation lyer from the model(business logic) lyer from the data
lyer(which is also the concept behind J2EE architecture). It's clear if you
think at your application with a composition of components. As we are going
ever much towards the open source market(therefore towards the open source
products) it will be likely that you could change one of the lyer's product
any time. The goal of your application should be to be able to do that,
without changing the others lyer's code. You should be able to change the
Struts framework, or the business logic framework, or the data access
framework withoth changing any of the other lyers.

Hope it will help.

Marco
 



-Original Message-
From: Vinay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:51 PM
To: Marco Tedone
Subject: Re: Packaging struts business logic and action classes


Thanks Marco,
  Now I have a clear perception of all these concepts.I am working
with struts with no EJB involved and trying to relate my application to
these concepts. I have two struts action classes, a DTO ,DAO and  Business
Delegate. Are DTO's in my application business objects (or)  Are both
business objects and DTO's mutuually exclusive?.

I am little confused about the distinction business objects and DTO's

I am new to J2EE and so started with struts without involving EJB .

Thank you

vinay



- Original Message -
From: "Marco Tedone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Vinay'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: Packaging struts business logic and action classes


Dear Vinay,

As far as I know I could tell you the following:

All the concept you mentioned lead to decouple layers. Business Objects are
a wide concept to identify entities which are involved in the business
domain and which have states and behaviours; someone identifys them with
nouns in a business domain. Examples could be persons, things, concepts. For
a class to be considered Business Object it should have the following
characteristics:

A) Consists of state and behaviour
B) Represents a person, place, thing or concept from the business domain
C) Is reusable

The only DAO concept I know for the moment is related to the DAO pattern,
which goal is to decouple the business logic of an application from the data
access logic. Using the DAO pattern lets you to change the underlying
database without changing your business logic.

Value Objects and Data transfer Objects are interchengeable words to mean
the same thing. They provide a coarse-grained view of remote, fine-grained
data. While Business Objects aim to decouple business logic from data-access
logic, DTOs aim to decouple presentation from business objects. In a word
they are presentation of business objects, but instead of them, they usually
don't provide any logic at all. Using DTOs leads to a better maintenance and
extensibility.

Marco
-Original Message-
From: Vinay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Packaging struts business logic and action classes



Can somebody please clarify or explain the following

1. Business Objects (BO's)
2. Data Access Objects (DAO's)
3. Value Objects (VO's)
4. Data transfer objects (DTO's)

All of the  above I know is part of the Model(M) in MVC architecture.I think
that Value Objects and DTO's are the same , and they have setters and
getters.Correct me if I am wrong.

What is the general way of packaging a struts application?
like if my companyname is www.companyname.neti will probably have an
application or context as applicationname as its name. I would like my
business logic to be independent from the struts specific controller(action
classes) .

 I also know the package should start with net.comp

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Greg.Reddin]

> Estimate the cost of doing 
> it yourself and 
> present the numbers to management.
> 

The problem is "we've already got one, you see..."  However, it pretty much sucks 
compared to Struts and would cost millions of dollars just to get it where Struts is 
right now -- and we'd never really get it to that point anyway.  It's not been very 
difficult to make that case.  It's just a matter of whether the guys w/ the cash will 
see it the way we do.  I think it's all a moot point right now b/c the decision has 
all but been made.  I get the feeling I'll not be leaving this list anytime soon...

Greg

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Exception handling - DispatchAction

[Karr, David]

Assuming you're using the "execute" method instead of the "perform"
method, you can technically avoid having a try/catch block at all
(because "execute" throws "Exception").  You would then define an
"exception" element in your struts-config that specifies how to handle
exceptions of that type (or base type).  In that exception handler, you
should log the real exception, and then you can forward to a page that
displays a friendly message.

-Original Message-
From: Johan Kumps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exception handling - DispatchAction

Hi all,

I have following problem.

In my Action class I'm calling a bussiness method that can throws a
checked
exception. I want to display this exception to the user on a user
friendly
page without the stacktrace. Because I have many action classes I don't
want
to code try catch blocks in all these action classes to catch the
checked
exception. I'm using a dispatch action so I can code several bussiness
actions in one action class.

Any ideas to solve my problem?

Kind regards,

Johan
---
This mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 10/01/2003


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Greg.Reddin]

> Struts is a framework which facilitates
> the building of browser-based applications 
>

Oh, I totally agree.  The "service" app concept was defined as needing to maintain 
state for multiple instances of business objects and respond to events, like a 
customer call in a call center app, working a work queue, etc.  To me Struts handles 
that fine.  You would build in the infrastructure that was needed in the model layer.

But, most people on the list speak of developing "sites".  I wondered how many are 
actually developing the inward-facing apps as opposed to customer-facing.

Greg


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Exception handling - DispatchAction

[Johan Kumps]

Hi all,

I have following problem.

In my Action class I'm calling a bussiness method that can throws a checked
exception. I want to display this exception to the user on a user friendly
page without the stacktrace. Because I have many action classes I don't want
to code try catch blocks in all these action classes to catch the checked
exception. I'm using a dispatch action so I can code several bussiness
actions in one action class.

Any ideas to solve my problem?

Kind regards,

Johan
---
This mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 10/01/2003


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service [FIXED]

[Robert Taylor]

I tripped over this post after searching google for a couple hours:

http://www.zerosleep.com/work/docs/jbossasservice.jsp

It seemed to fix the problem. Too bad its not documented by JNT.

robert

> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:41 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
>
>
> Andrew, in your experience with JNT did your applications define a
> shutdown.method? Was it ever called successfully? I can get JNT to install
> my app as an NT service, but when I try and start it, it shuts
> down immediately. It appears that it (Windows) never invokes my
> application
> although when I run the application from the command line it runs
> perfectly.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> robert
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 11:45 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
> >
> >
> > Ive used a simple freeware program called JNT to run java stuff
> as windows
> > services. Dont know if it can be used on an app server but worth a try.
> > http://www.eworksmart.com/JNT/
> >
> > oops. Just been looking through the links below - one of them points
> > (indirectly) to JNT already. Oh well. Guess thats 2 votes?
> >
> > I dont think this subject is "barely relevant". Sure its not
> > struts-specific
> > and would be better placed on something like the tomcat list or a
> > j2ee list
> > but its one of those things that those of us developing struts apps are
> > likely to deal with more than occasionally... (I would class it
> as "almost
> > relevant" hehe)
> >
> > I think Ill need to deal with this requirement soon for the
> struts app Im
> > working on so am also interested in the responses to this question.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Max Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 09:43
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
> >
> >
> > Here's a few from a Google search for "Windows service wrapper":
> >
> > http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/introduction.html
> > http://pharos.inria.fr/Java/display.jsp?id=c_6232
> > http://playstation2.idv.tw/serviceagent/index.php3
> >
> > -Max
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mark Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:04 PM
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
> >
> >
> > sorry, i was typing too fast in my subject, Web --> Win.  i guess this
> > deadline is making me nervous.  and you noticed my [OT].
> >
> > this is not an application server, this is a java application.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:02 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Web Service
> >
> >
> > Let's see.  First of all, this question is only barely relevant to this
> > mailing list.  Second, your subject line talks about something
> completely
> > different from what you describe in your note.  A "web service"
> > has nothing
> > to do with running a Windows application as a service.  Assuming
> > you really
> > meant the latter, I suggest you read the documentation for your
> > application
> > server to determine how to run it as a Windows service.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mark Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:58 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: [OT] Run Java App as a Web Service
> > >
> > >
> > > ok, i have this new requirement that has just come down today
> > > for a release next week.  these things arren't supposed to
> > > happen but they do!
> > >
> > > the java app i am providing needs to run as a WIN2000 Service.
> > >
> > > has anybody done thid before?  can you point me in the right
> > > direfction?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > mark
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > 
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[David Graham]

There is a difference between a website and a web app.  Struts is designed 
for web applications not just a collection of scripts known as a site.  Of 
course, Struts is equally well suited for creating a website.

The technical people at your company probably want to roll their own but the 
management will be swayed by $ figures.  Hundreds of thousands of dollars 
have been spent developing Struts.  Not really, but if we were all paid to 
do this then that would be true.  Estimate the cost of doing it yourself and 
present the numbers to management.

David






From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:41:24 -0600

Since we're on the subject  What kind of applications are being built 
using Struts?  We're one of those "big" companies where many folks would 
rather roll our own.  One of the defenses is that Struts was designed for 
"web sites" not "servicing apps".  Now I know that statement holds no 
merit, but it would be nice to have some validations.

Greg

> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: 'Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) '; ''Struts Users Mailing List' '
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
>
> No, actually apache and apache tomcat will be deployed as
> well.  That's a
> part of the whole Linux deployment strategy as well.  We are
> now working on
> the global load to deploy both.
>
> Ilya
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Sent: 1/23/03 12:01 PM
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
> Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and
> Linux/Intel is
> in for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be
> deployed on
> Linux here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate from
> Solaris --> Linux
>
> ---
> - Nayan Hajratwala
> - Chikli Consulting LLC
> - http://www.chikli.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
> To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
>
> Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear
> Open Source
> initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and other Open
> Source technologies.
>
> Ilya
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lepkowski
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
> I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  It
> sounds to
> me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they started with
> to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
> common base.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
>
> > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> > that they stopped at b2.
> (snip)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> > 
> > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
> provided
> > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts
> provided by IBM
> > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
> > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be supporting the
> > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application teams
> should NOT
> be
> > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are
> encouraged to use
> > the website for learning and documentation.
> > 
> >
> (snip)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 



_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service

[Robert Taylor]

Andrew, in your experience with JNT did your applications define a
shutdown.method? Was it ever called successfully? I can get JNT to install
my app as an NT service, but when I try and start it, it shuts
down immediately. It appears that it (Windows) never invokes my application
although when I run the application from the command line it runs perfectly.

Any ideas?

robert

> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 11:45 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
>
>
> Ive used a simple freeware program called JNT to run java stuff as windows
> services. Dont know if it can be used on an app server but worth a try.
> http://www.eworksmart.com/JNT/
>
> oops. Just been looking through the links below - one of them points
> (indirectly) to JNT already. Oh well. Guess thats 2 votes?
>
> I dont think this subject is "barely relevant". Sure its not
> struts-specific
> and would be better placed on something like the tomcat list or a
> j2ee list
> but its one of those things that those of us developing struts apps are
> likely to deal with more than occasionally... (I would class it as "almost
> relevant" hehe)
>
> I think Ill need to deal with this requirement soon for the struts app Im
> working on so am also interested in the responses to this question.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 09:43
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
>
>
> Here's a few from a Google search for "Windows service wrapper":
>
> http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/introduction.html
> http://pharos.inria.fr/Java/display.jsp?id=c_6232
> http://playstation2.idv.tw/serviceagent/index.php3
>
> -Max
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Win Service
>
>
> sorry, i was typing too fast in my subject, Web --> Win.  i guess this
> deadline is making me nervous.  and you noticed my [OT].
>
> this is not an application server, this is a java application.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:02 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Run Java App as a Web Service
>
>
> Let's see.  First of all, this question is only barely relevant to this
> mailing list.  Second, your subject line talks about something completely
> different from what you describe in your note.  A "web service"
> has nothing
> to do with running a Windows application as a service.  Assuming
> you really
> meant the latter, I suggest you read the documentation for your
> application
> server to determine how to run it as a Windows service.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:58 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: [OT] Run Java App as a Web Service
> >
> >
> > ok, i have this new requirement that has just come down today
> > for a release next week.  these things arren't supposed to
> > happen but they do!
> >
> > the java app i am providing needs to run as a WIN2000 Service.
> >
> > has anybody done thid before?  can you point me in the right
> > direfction?
> >
> > thanks,
> > mark
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Karr, David]

What the heck does that mean?  Struts is a framework which facilitates
the building of browser-based applications in a way that enhances their
maintainability.  It's perfectly applicable, probably more so, for
building inward or outward facing "service applications".

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

Since we're on the subject  What kind of applications are being
built using Struts?  We're one of those "big" companies where many folks
would rather roll our own.  One of the defenses is that Struts was
designed for "web sites" not "servicing apps".  Now I know that
statement holds no merit, but it would be nice to have some validations.

Greg


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Karr, David]

For other's benefit, that only applies for the ActionForm class
associated with the Action in the action-mapping.  If your "prepare
action" is associated with a different form bean, then that won't be
what you want.

However, you can have your "prepare action" and "process action"
action-mappings use the same form bean (make sure they are set in the
same scopes).  This would let you avoid writing the code to create the
form bean and put it into scope.  If your "prepare action" is also a
"process action" for another step, then this gets more complicated.

-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Struts hands you a form bean in your execute method.  You cast that
variable 
to your specific form type and use the setters to move data into it.
When 
you return an ActionForward object out of execute() struts will forward
to 
your input form with your populated bean.

You don't have to create the form bean yourself or put it into the
request, 
Struts does that for you as long as you tell it to in struts-config.xml.

David






>From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:43:22 -0500
>
>David,
>
>Thanks for your reply. How do you put the info into the form bean?
>
>I use a action called "RegistrationUpdateOpenAction"  to get the data
from
>the database and  forward to the view jsp (registrationUpdate.jsp), but
I
>don't know how to put that data into the form bean for this  ( the
>underlying form bean would be RegistrationUpdateForm). I'm confused as
the
>form bean is created/recycled by Struts on opening the view. How do I
get
>premptive access to it? Can I just create it and add it to the request
>scope? Won't struts create another one?
>
>Iain.
>
>
>Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc:
>
>Subject:Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
>
>Traditionally you do this:
>1.  GetMyFormAction determines if it's add or edit from a query string
>attribute.
>2.  For edit go get the info from db using the record's id you passed
in
>the
>query string.
>3.  Put that info into your form bean.
>4.  Forward to your form
>
>The form's input elements will be prepopulated with data for the edit
>screen.
>
>David
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
> >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0500
> >
> >Newbie question:
> >
> >I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry (
> >registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
>update
> >data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a
user
> >can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit
the
> >updates. How is this best done in struts ?
> >
> >I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has
been
> >to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to
> >populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
>struts
> >  html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
>"property"
> >attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the
ActionForm
> >accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates
to
> >the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data
> >with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the
> >session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works.
> >
> >I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.
> >
> >Iain Sanderson
> >
>
>
>_
>Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>
>
>
>
>


_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: RequiredIf Example Request

[Weber, Jeremy]

Yes, but I would think that it would only be run after the first validation
(the requiredif) runs.  Is that not a correct assumption?  Do I need to add
anything to the exists validation to make it so?  In your example if the
requiredif fails, does it still try to run the next validations?



Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Greg Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:20 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: RequiredIf Example Request


I'm not sure "exists" is a standard validation rule.  Did you define it
yourself?

-Original Message-
From: Weber, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:00 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: RequiredIf Example Request


Thank you , thank you, thank you!

I misspoke when I said checkboxs, its a radio button, like this...




 Yes
 No



 
   
   
field[0]
useSecure


field-test[0]
EQUAL


field-value[0]
true




>From what I can tell, this looks like it will work... But it doesnt.
However, this is the kicker... If I remove exists from depends, it acts as
it should.  Now I figured that exists would only be called if requiredif
passed.  Any thoughts?






Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Greg Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:26 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: RequiredIf Example Request


If you're just requesting an example of something, here's what I'm currently
using:

  





  minlength
  9
 

  maxlength
  9


  field[0]
  lastName


  field-test[0]
  NULL

  

This makes studentId required if lastName is NULL.  If I also wanted to add
a requirement to make studentId required if firstName was null, I'd add the
following to the above:


  field[1]
  lastName


  field-test[1]
  NULL


The conditions you can have are NULL, NOTNULL, and EQUAL.

I haven't used this with checkboxes yet, but I think you'd probably have
each of your three fields use requiredif, and use something like the
following to make it depend on the checkbox:


  field[0]
  checkboxFieldName


  field-test[0]
  NOTNULL


The fact that the example was using indicies screwed me up for a while too
until I took a look at the source code for FieldChecks.

GM

-Original Message-
From: Weber, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' (E-mail)
Subject: RequiredIf Example Request


I requested this before and have not recieved a response...:(  Any takers
out there?  Currently I am having a heck of time figuring out how to make
this work...  

I have checked out all the online examples, but I am unclear as to what this
stuff means...

If you have this in your struts-config.xml...






My form properties look like...




So I am missing the type and initial fields.  Can anybody help me see the
light?  I need a checkbox to control whether or not 3 addiotional text
fields are required.

Thanks,

Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Greg.Reddin]

Since we're on the subject  What kind of applications are being built using 
Struts?  We're one of those "big" companies where many folks would rather roll our 
own.  One of the defenses is that Struts was designed for "web sites" not "servicing 
apps".  Now I know that statement holds no merit, but it would be nice to have some 
validations.

Greg

> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: 'Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) '; ''Struts Users Mailing List' '
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> No, actually apache and apache tomcat will be deployed as 
> well.  That's a
> part of the whole Linux deployment strategy as well.  We are 
> now working on
> the global load to deploy both.
> 
> Ilya
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Sent: 1/23/03 12:01 PM
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and 
> Linux/Intel is
> in for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be 
> deployed on
> Linux here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate from
> Solaris --> Linux
> 
> ---
> - Nayan Hajratwala
> - Chikli Consulting LLC
> - http://www.chikli.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
> To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear 
> Open Source
> initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and other Open
> Source technologies.
> 
> Ilya
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lepkowski
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  It 
> sounds to
> me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they started with
> to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
> common base.  
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> > that they stopped at b2.  
> (snip)
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> 
> (snip)
> 
> > 
> > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
> provided
> > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts 
> provided by IBM
> > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
> > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be supporting the
> > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application teams 
> should NOT
> be
> > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are 
> encouraged to use
> > the website for learning and documentation.
> > 
> > 
> (snip)
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Karr, David]

No, your ActionForm.reset() method shouldn't be doing anything like
this.  That method is only intended to "clear" field values in
preparation for setting from the browser input form, and should not be
connected to any business logic in any way.

A "prepare action" and a "process action" are just Struts Action
classes.  You define action-mapping entries and forwards which navigate
between them.

-Original Message-
From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

I have done this by setting up the initial values in the "reset()"
method.

Is that not the correct way to do it?  If not, how do you switch between
"prepare actions" and "process actions"?

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[David Graham]

Struts hands you a form bean in your execute method.  You cast that variable 
to your specific form type and use the setters to move data into it.  When 
you return an ActionForward object out of execute() struts will forward to 
your input form with your populated bean.

You don't have to create the form bean yourself or put it into the request, 
Struts does that for you as long as you tell it to in struts-config.xml.

David






From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:43:22 -0500

David,

Thanks for your reply. How do you put the info into the form bean?

I use a action called "RegistrationUpdateOpenAction"  to get the data from
the database and  forward to the view jsp (registrationUpdate.jsp), but I
don't know how to put that data into the form bean for this  ( the
underlying form bean would be RegistrationUpdateForm). I'm confused as the
form bean is created/recycled by Struts on opening the view. How do I get
premptive access to it? Can I just create it and add it to the request
scope? Won't struts create another one?

Iain.


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Traditionally you do this:
1.  GetMyFormAction determines if it's add or edit from a query string
attribute.
2.  For edit go get the info from db using the record's id you passed in
the
query string.
3.  Put that info into your form bean.
4.  Forward to your form

The form's input elements will be prepopulated with data for the edit
screen.

David






>From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0500
>
>Newbie question:
>
>I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry (
>registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update
>data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user
>can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the
>updates. How is this best done in struts ?
>
>I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been
>to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to
>populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts
>  html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property"
>attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm
>accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to
>the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's data
>with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into the
>session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works.
>
>I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.
>
>Iain Sanderson
>


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 







_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: RequiredIf Example Request

[Greg Murray]

I'm not sure "exists" is a standard validation rule.  Did you define it yourself?

-Original Message-
From: Weber, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:00 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: RequiredIf Example Request


Thank you , thank you, thank you!

I misspoke when I said checkboxs, its a radio button, like this...




 Yes
 No



 
   
   
field[0]
useSecure


field-test[0]
EQUAL


field-value[0]
true




>From what I can tell, this looks like it will work... But it doesnt.
However, this is the kicker... If I remove exists from depends, it acts as
it should.  Now I figured that exists would only be called if requiredif
passed.  Any thoughts?






Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Greg Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:26 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: RequiredIf Example Request


If you're just requesting an example of something, here's what I'm currently
using:

  





  minlength
  9
 

  maxlength
  9


  field[0]
  lastName


  field-test[0]
  NULL

  

This makes studentId required if lastName is NULL.  If I also wanted to add
a requirement to make studentId required if firstName was null, I'd add the
following to the above:


  field[1]
  lastName


  field-test[1]
  NULL


The conditions you can have are NULL, NOTNULL, and EQUAL.

I haven't used this with checkboxes yet, but I think you'd probably have
each of your three fields use requiredif, and use something like the
following to make it depend on the checkbox:


  field[0]
  checkboxFieldName


  field-test[0]
  NOTNULL


The fact that the example was using indicies screwed me up for a while too
until I took a look at the source code for FieldChecks.

GM

-Original Message-
From: Weber, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' (E-mail)
Subject: RequiredIf Example Request


I requested this before and have not recieved a response...:(  Any takers
out there?  Currently I am having a heck of time figuring out how to make
this work...  

I have checked out all the online examples, but I am unclear as to what this
stuff means...

If you have this in your struts-config.xml...






My form properties look like...




So I am missing the type and initial fields.  Can anybody help me see the
light?  I need a checkbox to control whether or not 3 addiotional text
fields are required.

Thanks,

Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: problem with bean:define tag

[Karr, David]

That seems like a weird name to use, but it might work.  You really
should just be executing this in the debugger so you can see exactly
what is happening.

-Original Message-
From: Adel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with bean:define tag


Hi again,
Thanks for your answer David. The beanName I am using is
Action.Mapping_KEY:

This works fine with 1.1b1 but not with 1.1b3.
Adel
 Note that you will get this message if the count of "name", "value",
and
"body" is != 1.  The message sounds like it's saying you have more than
one of them, but in truth you could get the error if you had none of
them.  I'm going to guess that "beanName" is empty or null.

-Original Message-
From: Adel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem with bean:define tag


Hi,

I am having a strange problem with stuts 1.1.b3 (with Weblogic 7).
Everything woks fine with struts 1.1.b1 but when I moved to the 1.1.b3
the define tag is generating an exception. The define tag that generates
the execption:



The generated exception :

javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Define tag can contain only one of name
attribute, value attribute, or body content


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [OT]Good News

[Eric Jain]

> We have shipped several apps to the USAF & ARMY ,
> with struts 1.0 beta, 1.0.1, 1.1b1, 1.1b2, 1.1Nov, and soon to
> be Struts 1.1.

Aha. The rest of the world may still believe they are waiting for the weapon
inspectors final report, but we of course know better now...

So, when is Struts 1.1 final scheduled to be released?


--
Eric Jain


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: multi row / multi col input forms

[V. Cekvenich]

This works fine with either!

Ex:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/basicportal/ROOT/portlets/cms/ContentApprovePortlet.jsp

Make sure you implement a collection and unit test the formbean outside 
of Struts before doing any beans, including multi row.

.V
"Mentoring adds value"

Neil Carusetta wrote:
We are having trouble solving the same problem of updating the fields for a
DynaActionForm's indexed properties.  We are running on Struts 1.1 beta2.
Should we be using the latest beta3 to get this to work? 
Our configuration basically follows that of James' below.
We defined a Bean named EditFormIndexPropertyBean, which will be the
elements of the DynaActionForm's array property
The form-bean is configured as:

type="org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm">
   	
type="com.cgc.approve.struts.beans.EditFormIndexPropertyBean[]"
   	 size="10"/> 


The form's iteration in the JSP look like:

property="categoryIndex"
type="com.cgc.approve.struts.beans.EditFormIndexPropertyBean"
indexId="index">
   

   			 
 

   


Unlike James' example, we had to name the  'name' attribute
the same as the  'property' attribute, in this case
"categoryIndex".  Otherwise the PropertyUtils could not find the DynaForm's
property by that name.

Here's what appears to be the problem:  The DynaForm's array property
'categoryIndex' is not being populated with the elements of our
EditFormIndexPropertyBean. The array property is instantiated with the
correct name, however it is empty. The DynaActionForm then attempts to set
the property with name=categoryIndex at index 0 with some value:

DynaActionForm.set(String name, int index, Object value) {

DynaProperty descriptor = getDynaProperty(name);
Object prop = dynaValues.get(name);
}

This causes a null pointer exception as there are no dynaValues to retrieve
(no EditFormIndexPropertyBeans in the array property) .

We have used successfully indexed properties for DynaActionForms such as
String[] and Integer[] and other primitive type wrapper classes.  How can we
get our DynaActionForm to work use a property that consists of an array of
user defined classes?

A side question for any who might know.  When using a String[] property it
is not necessary to set the size attribute.  Is this needed for user defined
classes?

Thanks for any help,

Neil Carusetta
CGC 
 
   
*	From: James Turner 
*	Subject: RE: multi row / multi col input forms 
*	Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:44:18 -0800 

Here's one way to do it:

Let's say you want to be able to record the grades of some students
across a number of classes.

First define a Bean called StudentGrades:

Package example;

public StudentGrades {
   private String name, biology, chemistry, physics, english, math;

   public String getName () { return this.name; }
   public String getBiology () { return this.biology; }
   public String getChemisty () { return this.chemistry; }
   public String getPhysics () { return this.physics; }
   public String getEnglish () { return this.english; }
   public String getMath () { return this.math; }

   public void setName (String name) { this.name = name; }
   public void setBiology (String grade) { this.biology = grade; }
   public void setChemisty (String grade) { this.chemistry = grade; }
   public void setPhysics (String grade) { this.physics = grade; }
   public void setEnglish (String grade) { this.english = grade; }
   public void setMath (String grade) { this.math = grade; }
}

In your struts-config.xml, define:


type="org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm">
   
size="50">


Then, presuming that your Action populates the StudentGrades array with
the student names, in your JSP, you'd say:


NameBiologyChemistryPhysics
D>EnglishMath

type="example.StudentGrades">











-Original Message-
From: Mike Ash [] 
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:04 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: multi row / multi col input forms


I understand what he is saying about setter methods perhaps I 
am not explaining the problem correctly

The exact example is I am trying to display a listing of a 
dynamic number of projects with hours assigned to them by day 
for a given week, the user can then update any of those 
fields to make changes, some of those fields may be blank 
which means the browser will not send them to the server 
which puts the rows / cols out of balance.

I am using the logic iterate tag to build a row which looks like

someText  someMoreText inputBox1 inputBox2 inputBox3 inputBox4

So for two rows I get

someText  someMoreText inputBox1 inputBox2 inputBox3 
inputBox4 someText  someMoreText inputBox1 inputBox2 
inputBox3 inputBox4

This means that from a vertical perspective the boxes have 
the same name ( is there a better way to do the names?) If a 
inputBox doesn't contain anything I can't tell which one it 
really was except which column it "didn't" come from.

Clear as mud?







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Joe Barefoot]

Yep.  Jose Descalzo to my spanish-speaking friends. :)

> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:59 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Is that your real name?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> > facetiousness is being lost in a sea of literalism these 
> > days.  You must be so depressed. :)
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:50 AM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > No, IBM doesn't make cars.  They make computers.
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:48 PM
> > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, AS/400 Cars...;)
> > > > 
> > > >  --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > IBM 
> > > > makes cars?
> > > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now if they could just make 1 decent car...
> > > > > 
> > > > > >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:58:47 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 
> > > > 1.1 provided 
> > > > > >by and supported by IBM.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > 
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en 
> français !
> > > > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Iain Sanderson]

Alberto,

Perfect. And thanks, I'll give it a try. I'm sure this is what I needed to 
do.

Iain.


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 

Subject:RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

You can create an instance of the form you need (if is not the one you are
already getting in the execute method).
Once you have the form, you can then populate it. Then add it to the 
request
using the name you defined for this form within your struts-config file.

You'll have something like:
---
RegistrationUpdateForm myform = new RegistrationUpdateForm();
//populate myForm
...
//Add it to the request
request.setAttribute("formNameFromStrutsConfigFile", myform);
return mappings.findForward("success");


Regards,
Alberto Corona
VP Of Consulting Services
ObjectWave Corp.


-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


David,

Thanks for your reply. How do you put the info into the form bean?

I use a action called "RegistrationUpdateOpenAction"  to get the data from
the database and  forward to the view jsp (registrationUpdate.jsp), but I
don't know how to put that data into the form bean for this  ( the
underlying form bean would be RegistrationUpdateForm). I'm confused as the
form bean is created/recycled by Struts on opening the view. How do I get
premptive access to it? Can I just create it and add it to the request
scope? Won't struts create another one?

Iain.


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Traditionally you do this:
1.  GetMyFormAction determines if it's add or edit from a query string
attribute.
2.  For edit go get the info from db using the record's id you passed in
the
query string.
3.  Put that info into your form bean.
4.  Forward to your form

The form's input elements will be prepopulated with data for the edit
screen.

David






>From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0500
>
>Newbie question:
>
>I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry (
>registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update
>data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user
>can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the
>updates. How is this best done in struts ?
>
>I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been
>to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to
>populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts
>  html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property"
>attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm
>accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to
>the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's data
>with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into the
>session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works.
>
>I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.
>
>Iain Sanderson
>


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Iain Sanderson]

Not at all, 'cos I was thinking of doing it this way, but the other 
replies show what we should be doing, I think. Thanks anyway.

Iain.


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 

Subject:RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Depends on how hard you're going to flame me =)

Actually yes, but I'm guessing from your tone that I'm being a bad boy.

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


Nayan,

Are you accessing the business logic ( or database) in the reset method to 

determine the initial values?

Iain


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 

Subject:RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

I have done this by setting up the initial values in the "reset()" method.

Is that not the correct way to do it?  If not, how do you switch between 
"prepare actions" and "process actions"?

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: problem with bean:define tag

[Adel]

Hi again,
Thanks for your answer David. The beanName I am using is Action.Mapping_KEY:

This works fine with 1.1b1 but not with 1.1b3.
Adel
 Note that you will get this message if the count of "name", "value", and
"body" is != 1.  The message sounds like it's saying you have more than
one of them, but in truth you could get the error if you had none of
them.  I'm going to guess that "beanName" is empty or null.

-Original Message-
From: Adel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem with bean:define tag


Hi,

I am having a strange problem with stuts 1.1.b3 (with Weblogic 7).
Everything woks fine with struts 1.1.b1 but when I moved to the 1.1.b3
the define tag is generating an exception. The define tag that generates
the execption:



The generated exception :

javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Define tag can contain only one of name
attribute, value attribute, or body content

Adel.




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Re: Use of multiple struts-config files -- HELP

[Eric Rizzo]

Alvarado, Juan (c) wrote:

in struts-marketbreaks-config.xml I have the following: 


contextRelative="true">



And in a JSP I want to do the following: 

Access Rights

When I do this, I get the following error:
javax.servlet.ServletException: Cannot create rewrite URL:
java.net.MalformedURLException: Cannot retrive ActionForward named
accessrights
The problem is that the framework is not reading the
struts-marketbreaks-config.xml.  Can anyone tell me if they spot anythign I
am doing wrong.
I am new to the concept of multiple configuration files and I didn't find
anything on the archives.

See if 

helps you any. I think the global forwards in a module are "local" to 
that module, not the root of the webapp.

HTH,
	Eric
--
Eric Rizzo
Software Architect
Jibe, Inc.
http://www.jibeinc.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT]Good News

[Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC]

I work for myself - so yeah, I got approval from the President of the
company...

> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:58 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> 
> 
> Hmm, did you get approval from the President?
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:48 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> > 
> > 
> > I introduced Struts to USAF standard systems group (SSG) last 
> > year, and am
> > now introducing it at Air University... at least on the 
> > systems I've been
> > working on.
> > 
> > --
> > Voytek Jarnot
> > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:55 PM
> > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > > Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know 
> > > > of :-), are using Struts.  I'm not sure if this decision went 
> > > > all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like it would have.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Struts in the military, the mind boggles.
> > > 
> > > "This IS your MVC platform.  You will learn to configure 
> > it, debug it,
> > > and deploy it IN YOUR SLEEP.  You will take better care of it 
> > > than your
> > > girlfriend.  If I ever see ANYONE trying to integrate it 
> > into .NET, I
> > > will personally make your life a living hell"
> > > 
> > > James Turner
> > > Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > Author: 
> > > MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
> > > Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
> > > ISBN 0672323095; Sams, 2002
> > > 
> > > Co-Author: 
> > > Struts Kick Start
> > > ISBN 0672324725; Sams, 2002
> > > 
> > > Forthcoming:
> > > JavaServer Faces Kick Start 
> > > Sams, Fall 2003
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)]

Depends on how hard you're going to flame me =)

Actually yes, but I'm guessing from your tone that I'm being a bad boy.

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


Nayan,

Are you accessing the business logic ( or database) in the reset method to 
determine the initial values?

Iain


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 

Subject:RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

I have done this by setting up the initial values in the "reset()" method.

Is that not the correct way to do it?  If not, how do you switch between 
"prepare actions" and "process actions"?

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Alberto Corona]

You can create an instance of the form you need (if is not the one you are
already getting in the execute method).
Once you have the form, you can then populate it. Then add it to the request
using the name you defined for this form within your struts-config file.

You'll have something like:
---
RegistrationUpdateForm myform = new RegistrationUpdateForm();
//populate myForm
...
//Add it to the request
request.setAttribute("formNameFromStrutsConfigFile", myform);
return mappings.findForward("success");


Regards,
Alberto Corona
VP Of Consulting Services
ObjectWave Corp.


-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


David,

Thanks for your reply. How do you put the info into the form bean?

I use a action called "RegistrationUpdateOpenAction"  to get the data from
the database and  forward to the view jsp (registrationUpdate.jsp), but I
don't know how to put that data into the form bean for this  ( the
underlying form bean would be RegistrationUpdateForm). I'm confused as the
form bean is created/recycled by Struts on opening the view. How do I get
premptive access to it? Can I just create it and add it to the request
scope? Won't struts create another one?

Iain.


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Traditionally you do this:
1.  GetMyFormAction determines if it's add or edit from a query string
attribute.
2.  For edit go get the info from db using the record's id you passed in
the
query string.
3.  Put that info into your form bean.
4.  Forward to your form

The form's input elements will be prepopulated with data for the edit
screen.

David






>From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0500
>
>Newbie question:
>
>I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry (
>registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update
>data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user
>can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the
>updates. How is this best done in struts ?
>
>I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been
>to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to
>populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts
>  html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property"
>attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm
>accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to
>the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's data
>with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into the
>session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works.
>
>I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.
>
>Iain Sanderson
>


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Eric Rizzo]

Iain Sanderson wrote:

David,

Thanks for your reply. How do you put the info into the form bean?

I use a action called "RegistrationUpdateOpenAction"  to get the data from 
the database and  forward to the view jsp (registrationUpdate.jsp), but I 
don't know how to put that data into the form bean for this  ( the 
underlying form bean would be RegistrationUpdateForm). I'm confused as the 
form bean is created/recycled by Struts on opening the view. How do I get 
premptive access to it? Can I just create it and add it to the request 
scope? Won't struts create another one?

The form bean instance is passed into your action's perform or execute 
method. Just populate it and return a forward to the JSP.

HTH,
	Eric
--
Eric Rizzo
Software Architect
Jibe, Inc.
http://www.jibeinc.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: RequiredIf Example Request

[Weber, Jeremy]

Thank you , thank you, thank you!

I misspoke when I said checkboxs, its a radio button, like this...




 Yes
 No



 
   
   
field[0]
useSecure


field-test[0]
EQUAL


field-value[0]
true




>From what I can tell, this looks like it will work... But it doesnt.
However, this is the kicker... If I remove exists from depends, it acts as
it should.  Now I figured that exists would only be called if requiredif
passed.  Any thoughts?






Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Greg Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:26 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: RequiredIf Example Request


If you're just requesting an example of something, here's what I'm currently
using:

  





  minlength
  9
 

  maxlength
  9


  field[0]
  lastName


  field-test[0]
  NULL

  

This makes studentId required if lastName is NULL.  If I also wanted to add
a requirement to make studentId required if firstName was null, I'd add the
following to the above:


  field[1]
  lastName


  field-test[1]
  NULL


The conditions you can have are NULL, NOTNULL, and EQUAL.

I haven't used this with checkboxes yet, but I think you'd probably have
each of your three fields use requiredif, and use something like the
following to make it depend on the checkbox:


  field[0]
  checkboxFieldName


  field-test[0]
  NOTNULL


The fact that the example was using indicies screwed me up for a while too
until I took a look at the source code for FieldChecks.

GM

-Original Message-
From: Weber, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' (E-mail)
Subject: RequiredIf Example Request


I requested this before and have not recieved a response...:(  Any takers
out there?  Currently I am having a heck of time figuring out how to make
this work...  

I have checked out all the online examples, but I am unclear as to what this
stuff means...

If you have this in your struts-config.xml...






My form properties look like...




So I am missing the type and initial fields.  Can anybody help me see the
light?  I need a checkbox to control whether or not 3 addiotional text
fields are required.

Thanks,

Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Iain Sanderson]

Nayan,

Are you accessing the business logic ( or database) in the reset method to 
determine the initial values?

Iain


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 

Subject:RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

I have done this by setting up the initial values in the "reset()" method.

Is that not the correct way to do it?  If not, how do you switch between 
"prepare actions" and "process actions"?

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT]Good News

[Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE]

Hmm, did you get approval from the President?


> -Original Message-
> From: Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> 
> 
> I introduced Struts to USAF standard systems group (SSG) last 
> year, and am
> now introducing it at Air University... at least on the 
> systems I've been
> working on.
> 
> --
> Voytek Jarnot
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:55 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> > 
> > 
> > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> >  
> > > 
> > > Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know 
> > > of :-), are using Struts.  I'm not sure if this decision went 
> > > all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like it would have.
> > > 
> > 
> > Struts in the military, the mind boggles.
> > 
> > "This IS your MVC platform.  You will learn to configure 
> it, debug it,
> > and deploy it IN YOUR SLEEP.  You will take better care of it 
> > than your
> > girlfriend.  If I ever see ANYONE trying to integrate it 
> into .NET, I
> > will personally make your life a living hell"
> > 
> > James Turner
> > Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Author: 
> > MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
> > Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
> > ISBN 0672323095; Sams, 2002
> > 
> > Co-Author: 
> > Struts Kick Start
> > ISBN 0672324725; Sams, 2002
> > 
> > Forthcoming:
> > JavaServer Faces Kick Start 
> > Sams, Fall 2003
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)]

I have done this by setting up the initial values in the "reset()" method.

Is that not the correct way to do it?  If not, how do you switch between "prepare 
actions" and "process actions"?

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?


In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Iain Sanderson]

Yes,

I'm really doing precisely this - but I don't know how to transfer the 
data from the business logic to the form bean underlying the the page 
view. My kludge is to get around this deficiency.  How is it done?

Iain


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 

Subject:RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[Sterin, Ilya]

Exactly what I was going to say.  Some people responded, but I coudldn't
since I wasn't sure if this was meant to be an explanation, or a bunch of
word glued together.  Certainly not English.



-Original Message-
From: David Graham
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/23/03 12:27 PM
Subject: [OT] RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

Your message doesn't make any sense.

David






>From: "francis A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:19:04 -0500
>
>ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I have worked
in 
>three project for past 15 months and all are big players in the
industried 
>today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
>z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when compared to all
those 
>S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:14 -0500
>>
>>Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and Linux/Intel
is 
>>in for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be deployed
on 
>>Linux here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate from 
>>Solaris --> Linux
>>
>>---
>>- Nayan Hajratwala
>>- Chikli Consulting LLC
>>- http://www.chikli.com
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
>>To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
>>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>>
>>
>>Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear Open
Source
>>initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and other Open
>>Source technologies.
>>
>>Ilya
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Mark Lepkowski
>>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>>Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
>>Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>>
>>I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  It sounds
to
>>me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they started with
>>to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
>>common base.
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
>>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>>
>>
>> > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat
unfortunate
>> > that they stopped at b2.
>>(snip)
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
>> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>> > 
>> > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
>>provided
>> > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts provided by
IBM
>> > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
>> > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be supporting the
>> > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application teams should
NOT
>>be
>> > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are encouraged to
use
>> > the website for learning and documentation.
>> > 
>> >
>>(snip)
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>
>
>
>_
>MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>


_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [OT]Good News

[Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC]

I introduced Struts to USAF standard systems group (SSG) last year, and am
now introducing it at Air University... at least on the systems I've been
working on.

--
Voytek Jarnot
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.


> -Original Message-
> From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:55 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> 
> 
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
>  
> > 
> > Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know 
> > of :-), are using Struts.  I'm not sure if this decision went 
> > all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like it would have.
> > 
> 
> Struts in the military, the mind boggles.
> 
> "This IS your MVC platform.  You will learn to configure it, debug it,
> and deploy it IN YOUR SLEEP.  You will take better care of it 
> than your
> girlfriend.  If I ever see ANYONE trying to integrate it into .NET, I
> will personally make your life a living hell"
> 
> James Turner
> Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Author: 
> MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
> Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
> ISBN 0672323095; Sams, 2002
> 
> Co-Author: 
> Struts Kick Start
> ISBN 0672324725; Sams, 2002
> 
> Forthcoming:
> JavaServer Faces Kick Start 
> Sams, Fall 2003
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Karr, David]

In general, Struts applications will use "prepare actions" to prepare
the data for a form, and "process actions" to process the submitted data
for a form.  In your "prepare action" code, you'll interface with your
business logic to obtain the required data, then populate fields of a
bean, probably in request scope, not session scope, then you'll forward
to your page view, which will use the request scope bean to populate the
form.  Your "process action" will then take the fields from the form
(populated from the HTML fields) and send the changed values to your
business logic.

Usually, you can avoid putting most of this bean data into the session
scope.

-Original Message-
From: Iain Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to
update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user

can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been

to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use
struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and
"property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to

the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's
data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into
the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Iain Sanderson]

David,

Thanks for your reply. How do you put the info into the form bean?

I use a action called "RegistrationUpdateOpenAction"  to get the data from 
the database and  forward to the view jsp (registrationUpdate.jsp), but I 
don't know how to put that data into the form bean for this  ( the 
underlying form bean would be RegistrationUpdateForm). I'm confused as the 
form bean is created/recycled by Struts on opening the view. How do I get 
premptive access to it? Can I just create it and add it to the request 
scope? Won't struts create another one?

Iain.


Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 

Subject:Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

Traditionally you do this:
1.  GetMyFormAction determines if it's add or edit from a query string 
attribute.
2.  For edit go get the info from db using the record's id you passed in 
the 
query string.
3.  Put that info into your form bean.
4.  Forward to your form

The form's input elements will be prepopulated with data for the edit 
screen.

David






>From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0500
>
>Newbie question:
>
>I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry (
>registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to 
update
>data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user
>can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the
>updates. How is this best done in struts ?
>
>I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been
>to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to
>populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use 
struts
>  html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and 
"property"
>attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm
>accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to
>the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's data
>with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into the
>session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works.
>
>I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.
>
>Iain Sanderson
>


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [OT]Good News

[Robert Leland]

James Turner wrote:

From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 

 

Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know 
of :-), are using Struts.  I'm not sure if this decision went 
all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like it would have.



Struts in the military, the mind boggles.


We have shipped several apps to the USAF & ARMY ,
with struts 1.0 beta, 1.0.1, 1.1b1, 1.1b2, 1.1Nov, and soon to
be Struts 1.1.

-Rob



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Sterin, Ilya]

No, actually apache and apache tomcat will be deployed as well.  That's a
part of the whole Linux deployment strategy as well.  We are now working on
the global load to deploy both.

Ilya

-Original Message-
From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Sent: 1/23/03 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and Linux/Intel is
in for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be deployed on
Linux here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate from
Solaris --> Linux

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford


Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear Open Source
initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and other Open
Source technologies.

Ilya

-Original Message-
From: Mark Lepkowski
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  It sounds to
me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they started with
to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
common base.  

- Original Message - 
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford


> It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> that they stopped at b2.  
(snip)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 

(snip)

> 
> The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
provided
> by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts provided by IBM
> with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
> provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be supporting the
> versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application teams should NOT
be
> downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are encouraged to use
> the website for learning and documentation.
> 
> 
(snip)


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[David Graham]

Traditionally you do this:
1.  GetMyFormAction determines if it's add or edit from a query string 
attribute.
2.  For edit go get the info from db using the record's id you passed in the 
query string.
3.  Put that info into your form bean.
4.  Forward to your form

The form's input elements will be prepopulated with data for the edit 
screen.

David






From: "Iain Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0500

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry (
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to update
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user
can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been
to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use struts
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and "property"
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to
the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's data
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into the
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works.

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson




_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: RequiredIf Example Request

[Greg Murray]

If you're just requesting an example of something, here's what I'm currently using:

  





  minlength
  9
 

  maxlength
  9


  field[0]
  lastName


  field-test[0]
  NULL

  

This makes studentId required if lastName is NULL.  If I also wanted to add a 
requirement to make studentId required if firstName was null, I'd add the following to 
the above:


  field[1]
  lastName


  field-test[1]
  NULL


The conditions you can have are NULL, NOTNULL, and EQUAL.

I haven't used this with checkboxes yet, but I think you'd probably have each of your 
three fields use requiredif, and use something like the following to make it depend on 
the checkbox:


  field[0]
  checkboxFieldName


  field-test[0]
  NOTNULL


The fact that the example was using indicies screwed me up for a while too until I 
took a look at the source code for FieldChecks.

GM

-Original Message-
From: Weber, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' (E-mail)
Subject: RequiredIf Example Request


I requested this before and have not recieved a response...:(  Any takers
out there?  Currently I am having a heck of time figuring out how to make
this work...  

I have checked out all the online examples, but I am unclear as to what this
stuff means...

If you have this in your struts-config.xml...






My form properties look like...




So I am missing the type and initial fields.  Can anybody help me see the
light?  I need a checkbox to control whether or not 3 addiotional text
fields are required.

Thanks,

Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

HOWTO pre-populate forms with data, then update ?

[Iain Sanderson]

Newbie question:

I've managed to use Struts forms as a means of  initial data entry ( 
registration forms etc) but have got  stuck on how to use a form to update 
data that already exists in a database. For example, a form where a user 
can update their user details (address, email etc) and then submit the 
updates. How is this best done in struts ?

I'm sure there's a good way of doing this, but my Kludge so far has been 
to  create a bean in the session scope containing the data I want to 
populate the form with ( eg a user's current address), and then use struts 
 html:text  tags to view  the bean data using their "name" and "property" 
attributes.   Once the user has submitted their updates, the ActionForm 
accesses the form bean to obtain the updates, and applies the updates to 
the database.   I then of course have to update the  original bean's data 
with the new values ( eg their amended address) and send it back into the 
session scope.  It's a bit of a mess, but it works. 

I know there's a better way. Please help. Thanks.

Iain Sanderson
 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mike Oliver]

Or likely any less...;-)

Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036


-Original Message-
From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:07 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

I don't do that anymore

-Original Message-
From: Pani, Gourav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Now is that specific case of death enforced by public stoning?

-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in the 
> > abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant
> facetiousness is

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mike Oliver]

And with other Open Source integration/interops like Axis4Struts,
Struts4Slide, Turbine4Strutsand my favorite VelocoRaptor and that
list goes on, before long you will be able to concentrate on just the
problem you are solving and not worry too much about infrastructure.

Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford



I agree here -

The typical big company response would've been to build their own custom
framework from the ground up. The fact that they chose to start with
Struts
shows they put a good deal of thought into it and trusted the quality of
the work. It's very likely that they had internal projects be successful
using Struts and then ramped it up as a standard. I'm sure they did a
great
deal of testing on it and had some camps pulling to build something
custom.
There were likely other competing frameworks as well.

This is one of the greatest strengths of Open Source - as a large
company
you can take the app and customize to your internal environment. For
example:

 - You could create abstract 'model' components that standardize they
way
people throughout the company perform database access (or web sevice
access).

 - You could customize it to provide a standard method of acquiring and
storing user credentials so that all applications manage user
information
the same way.

 - You could implement plug-ins to perform custom and standardized
logging
(assuming there is a standard logging process already in place).

The possibilities are endless -

I'll bet anything this is not the last time we here of a Fortune 500
company adopting Struts for intrnal development.










 

 

 "Craig R. McClanahan" To: Struts Users Mailing
List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Kevin
Bedell/Systems/USHO/SunLife)
 01/23/2003 02:18 PM   Subject:  RE: Struts
officially supported at Ford   
 Please respond to "Struts

 Users Mailing List"

 

 







On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Karr, David wrote:

>
> It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> that they stopped at b2.  There were numerous fixes put in after b2,
> including the entire Struts-EL contribution.  Hopefully they can
upgrade
> their support pretty quickly.
>

Don't give them too hard a time about this.

It's absolutely appropriate for organizations responsible for mission
critical software to be conservative in their version choices -- and
every
such organization I'm familiar with puts any potential new version
through
very extensive testing (for example, against existing apps or against
any
in house customizations they did to the previous version) before putting
their stamp of approval on it.  Struts 1.1b3 hasn't been out long enough
to go through a cycle like that -- and, if I were in their shoes, given
the timing, I'd probably just skip certifying b3 and go certify 1.1
final.

What I'm very pleased about, though, is that Ford "gets it" in a
different
respsect -- they didn't consider "beta" to be a four-letter word :-).

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>






---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified
that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.

---




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)]

Actually, the case is more impressive than you describe.

Struts won out over several custom frameworks that currently exist within ford and 
have quite a bit of political clout behind them.  What won out in the end was that 
there was no good cost-effective support model for the internal frameworks.  Too many 
resources would have to be spent supporting/updating the alternatives.

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford




I agree here -

The typical big company response would've been to build their own custom
framework from the ground up. The fact that they chose to start with Struts
shows they put a good deal of thought into it and trusted the quality of
the work. It's very likely that they had internal projects be successful
using Struts and then ramped it up as a standard. I'm sure they did a great
deal of testing on it and had some camps pulling to build something custom.
There were likely other competing frameworks as well.

This is one of the greatest strengths of Open Source - as a large company
you can take the app and customize to your internal environment. For
example:

 - You could create abstract 'model' components that standardize they way
people throughout the company perform database access (or web sevice
access).

 - You could customize it to provide a standard method of acquiring and
storing user credentials so that all applications manage user information
the same way.

 - You could implement plug-ins to perform custom and standardized logging
(assuming there is a standard logging process already in place).

The possibilities are endless -

I'll bet anything this is not the last time we here of a Fortune 500
company adopting Struts for intrnal development.










   

   

 "Craig R. McClanahan" To: Struts Users Mailing List 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Kevin 
Bedell/Systems/USHO/SunLife)
 01/23/2003 02:18 PM   Subject:  RE: Struts officially 
supported at Ford   
 Please respond to "Struts 

 Users Mailing List"   

   

   







On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Karr, David wrote:

>
> It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> that they stopped at b2.  There were numerous fixes put in after b2,
> including the entire Struts-EL contribution.  Hopefully they can upgrade
> their support pretty quickly.
>

Don't give them too hard a time about this.

It's absolutely appropriate for organizations responsible for mission
critical software to be conservative in their version choices -- and every
such organization I'm familiar with puts any potential new version through
very extensive testing (for example, against existing apps or against any
in house customizations they did to the previous version) before putting
their stamp of approval on it.  Struts 1.1b3 hasn't been out long enough
to go through a cycle like that -- and, if I were in their shoes, given
the timing, I'd probably just skip certifying b3 and go certify 1.1 final.

What I'm very pleased about, though, is that Ford "gets it" in a different
respsect -- they didn't consider "beta" to be a four-letter word :-).

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.
--

RequiredIf Example Request

[Weber, Jeremy]

I requested this before and have not recieved a response...:(  Any takers
out there?  Currently I am having a heck of time figuring out how to make
this work...  

I have checked out all the online examples, but I am unclear as to what this
stuff means...

If you have this in your struts-config.xml...






My form properties look like...




So I am missing the type and initial fields.  Can anybody help me see the
light?  I need a checkbox to control whether or not 3 addiotional text
fields are required.

Thanks,

Jeremy Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Robert McIntosh]

LMAO!!!
Friday has come early...

Mark Galbreath wrote:


I never studied law.

Joe just goes by "Barefoot" on this list.  Elsewhere he's known as "Joe
Millionaire."  Perhaps you've seen him on TV?  Before he made his fortune as
a Java developer, he cleaned septic tanks for a living.

-Original Message-
From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:56 PM


Mark seems to operate under different laws of the universe than the rest of
us. I suspect that this one wouldn't apply to him either.

 

-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:54 PM

Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

   

-Original Message-
From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM

Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.

-Original Message-
From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM

It was a real question.  No offense :)

-Dave

 

-Original Message-
From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM

There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in the 
abyss

-Original Message-
From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM

Is that your real name?

   

-Original Message-
From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
 




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts Job

[jmattucci]

im a developer in toronto. Can I contact you max?



   

  "Mark Galbreath" 

 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   

   cc: 

  01/23/2003 08:59 Subject:  RE: [OT] Struts Job   

  AM   

  Please respond to

  "Struts Users

  Mailing List"

   

   





Don't know, but there's a bunch of hashers!

http://www.hogtownh3.ca/

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Brandon Goodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:22 PM

Toronto!? Isn't that where those wacky Raelians live hanging out at the UFO
Barn. :-D



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





*

This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
Thank you
*



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Struts at Lands' End, Inc. (was RE: Struts officially supported at Ford)

[Chappell, Simon P]

>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford



>I'll bet anything this is not the last time we here of a Fortune 500
>company adopting Struts for intrnal development.

Like my employer perhaps? Lands' End, Inc. has not made big fancy formal 
announcements, but we have the blessing and endorsement of our architecture group to 
use Struts for both internal and customer facing development projects.

Our Business Outfitters (B2B) site is currently being rewritten using Struts. The 
project that I was on in 2002 was for an internal warehouse packing system and even 
now, the plans are being laid to work on phase two. Struts rocks and next time you 
order a Lands' End shirt (that was a hint), there's a good chance that Struts helped 
to pack and ship it! :-)

Simon

-
Simon P. Chappell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java Programming Specialist  www.landsend.com
Lands' End, Inc.   (608) 935-4526

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mike Oliver]

How does that go, "Those without stones...throw what you have".

Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036


-Original Message-
From: Pani, Gourav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

Now is that specific case of death enforced by public stoning?

-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> > the abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> facetiousness is 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mark Galbreath]

I don't do that anymore

-Original Message-
From: Pani, Gourav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:57 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Now is that specific case of death enforced by public stoning?

-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in the 
> > abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant
> facetiousness is

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT]Good News

[Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE]

Logon and give me 20 words per minute soldier.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:55 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> 
> 
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
>  
> > 
> > Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know 
> > of :-), are using Struts.  I'm not sure if this decision went 
> > all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like it would have.
> > 
> 
> Struts in the military, the mind boggles.
> 
> "This IS your MVC platform.  You will learn to configure it, debug it,
> and deploy it IN YOUR SLEEP.  You will take better care of it 
> than your
> girlfriend.  If I ever see ANYONE trying to integrate it into .NET, I
> will personally make your life a living hell"
> 
> James Turner
> Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Author: 
> MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
> Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
> ISBN 0672323095; Sams, 2002
> 
> Co-Author: 
> Struts Kick Start
> ISBN 0672324725; Sams, 2002
> 
> Forthcoming:
> JavaServer Faces Kick Start 
> Sams, Fall 2003
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mark Galbreath]

I never studied law.

Joe just goes by "Barefoot" on this list.  Elsewhere he's known as "Joe
Millionaire."  Perhaps you've seen him on TV?  Before he made his fortune as
a Java developer, he cleaned septic tanks for a living.

-Original Message-
From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:56 PM


Mark seems to operate under different laws of the universe than the rest of
us. I suspect that this one wouldn't apply to him either.

>-Original Message-
>From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:54 PM
>
>Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.
>
>-= J
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
>> 
>> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
>> 
>> It was a real question.  No offense :)
>> 
>> -Dave
>> 
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
>> > 
>> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in the 
>> > abyss
>> > 
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
>> > 
>> > Is that your real name?
>> > 
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Use of multiple struts-config files -- HELP

[Alvarado, Juan (c)]

I have the following configuration in my web.xml:


action
 
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet

config
 
/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml


config/marketbreaks
 
/WEB-INF/struts-marketbreaks-config.xml


debug
2


detail
2


validate
true

2


in struts-marketbreaks-config.xml I have the following: 





And in a JSP I want to do the following: 

Access Rights

When I do this, I get the following error:
javax.servlet.ServletException: Cannot create rewrite URL:
java.net.MalformedURLException: Cannot retrive ActionForward named
accessrights
The problem is that the framework is not reading the
struts-marketbreaks-config.xml.  Can anyone tell me if they spot anythign I
am doing wrong.
I am new to the concept of multiple configuration files and I didn't find
anything on the archives.
Thanks in advance





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Kevin . Bedell]

I agree here -

The typical big company response would've been to build their own custom
framework from the ground up. The fact that they chose to start with Struts
shows they put a good deal of thought into it and trusted the quality of
the work. It's very likely that they had internal projects be successful
using Struts and then ramped it up as a standard. I'm sure they did a great
deal of testing on it and had some camps pulling to build something custom.
There were likely other competing frameworks as well.

This is one of the greatest strengths of Open Source - as a large company
you can take the app and customize to your internal environment. For
example:

 - You could create abstract 'model' components that standardize they way
people throughout the company perform database access (or web sevice
access).

 - You could customize it to provide a standard method of acquiring and
storing user credentials so that all applications manage user information
the same way.

 - You could implement plug-ins to perform custom and standardized logging
(assuming there is a standard logging process already in place).

The possibilities are endless -

I'll bet anything this is not the last time we here of a Fortune 500
company adopting Struts for intrnal development.










   

   

 "Craig R. McClanahan" To: Struts Users Mailing List 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Kevin 
Bedell/Systems/USHO/SunLife)
 01/23/2003 02:18 PM   Subject:  RE: Struts officially 
supported at Ford   
 Please respond to "Struts 

 Users Mailing List"   

   

   







On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Karr, David wrote:

>
> It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> that they stopped at b2.  There were numerous fixes put in after b2,
> including the entire Struts-EL contribution.  Hopefully they can upgrade
> their support pretty quickly.
>

Don't give them too hard a time about this.

It's absolutely appropriate for organizations responsible for mission
critical software to be conservative in their version choices -- and every
such organization I'm familiar with puts any potential new version through
very extensive testing (for example, against existing apps or against any
in house customizations they did to the previous version) before putting
their stamp of approval on it.  Struts 1.1b3 hasn't been out long enough
to go through a cycle like that -- and, if I were in their shoes, given
the timing, I'd probably just skip certifying b3 and go certify 1.1 final.

What I'm very pleased about, though, is that Ford "gets it" in a different
respsect -- they didn't consider "beta" to be a four-letter word :-).

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.
---




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Pani, Gourav]

EE!!!  Spin again.  



-Original Message-
From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:59 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Is that a Punjab?

Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036


-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> > the abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> facetiousness is 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mike Oliver]

Is that a Punjab?

Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036


-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> > the abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> facetiousness is 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Bredesen, Chris - NA US HQ Delray]

Nope, tiling.

> -Original Message-
> From: Pani, Gourav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:57 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Now is that specific case of death enforced by public stoning?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:54 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.
> 
> -= J
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > It was a real question.  No offense :)
> > 
> > -Dave
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> > > the abyss
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is that your real name?
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> > facetiousness is 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Pani, Gourav]

Now is that specific case of death enforced by public stoning?

-Original Message-
From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> > the abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> facetiousness is 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Chappell, Simon P]

Mark seems to operate under different laws of the universe than the rest of us. I 
suspect that this one wouldn't apply to him either.

>-Original Message-
>From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:54 PM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
>
>Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.
>
>-= J
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
>> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> 
>> 
>> It was a real question.  No offense :)
>> 
>> -Dave
>> 
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
>> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > 
>> > 
>> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
>> > the abyss
>> > 
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
>> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Is that your real name?
>> > 
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
>> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
>> facetiousness is 
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT]Good News

[James Turner]

> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
 
> 
> Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know 
> of :-), are using Struts.  I'm not sure if this decision went 
> all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like it would have.
> 

Struts in the military, the mind boggles.

"This IS your MVC platform.  You will learn to configure it, debug it,
and deploy it IN YOUR SLEEP.  You will take better care of it than your
girlfriend.  If I ever see ANYONE trying to integrate it into .NET, I
will personally make your life a living hell"

James Turner
Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Author: 
MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
ISBN 0672323095; Sams, 2002

Co-Author: 
Struts Kick Start
ISBN 0672324725; Sams, 2002

Forthcoming:
JavaServer Faces Kick Start 
Sams, Fall 2003



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[James Childers]

Under Sharia law puns that bad are punishable by death.

-= J

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> It was a real question.  No offense :)
> 
> -Dave
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> > the abyss
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Is that your real name?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant 
> facetiousness is 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Struts Job

[jmattucci]

im a developer in toronto. Can I contact you max?



   

  "Mark Galbreath" 

 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   

   cc: 

  01/23/2003 08:59 Subject:  RE: [OT] Struts Job   

  AM   

  Please respond to

  "Struts Users

  Mailing List"

   

   





Don't know, but there's a bunch of hashers!

http://www.hogtownh3.ca/

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Brandon Goodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:22 PM

Toronto!? Isn't that where those wacky Raelians live hanging out at the UFO
Barn. :-D



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




*

This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
Thank you
*



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mark Galbreath]

Yes, that's his real name.  He hunts buffalo with a java-lin, too.

-Original Message-
From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


It was a real question.  No offense :)

-Dave

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in
> the abyss
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Is that your real name?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant facetiousness is 
> > being lost in a sea of literalism these days.  You must be so 
> > depressed. :)
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:50 AM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > No, IBM doesn't make cars.  They make computers.
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:48 PM
> > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, AS/400 Cars...;)
> > > > 
> > > >  --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > IBM 
> > > > makes cars?
> > > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now if they could just make 1 decent car...
> > > > > 
> > > > > >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:58:47 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts
> > > > 1.1 provided
> > > > > >by and supported by IBM.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > 
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en
> français !
> > > > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Chappell, Simon P]

On the internet, no one knows if you're a dog. He's a real member of the list and his 
email says he's called Joe Barefoot. What else is there to know? :-)

a list member allegedly called Simon Chappell

>-Original Message-
>From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:49 PM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>
>
>It was a real question.  No offense :)
>
>-Dave
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
>> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> 
>> 
>> There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in 
>> the abyss
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> 
>> 
>> Is that your real name?
>> 
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
>> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant
>> > facetiousness is being lost in a sea of literalism these 
>> > days.  You must be so depressed. :)
>> > 
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
>> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:50 AM
>> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > No, IBM doesn't make cars.  They make computers.
>> > > 
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:48 PM
>> > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > Yes, AS/400 Cars...;)
>> > > > 
>> > > >  --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > IBM
>> > > > makes cars?
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Now if they could just make 1 decent car...
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > > > >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:58:47 -0500
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts
>> > > > 1.1 provided
>> > > > > >by and supported by IBM.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> > > > 
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > 
>> > > > >  
>> > > > 
>> > > > ___
>> > > > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en 
>> français ! 
>> > > > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
>> > > > 
>> > > > --
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> > > 
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > --
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> > > 
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>
>
>
>--
>To 
>unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For 
>additional commands, 
>e-mail: 
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[francis A]

you are correct just before meeting i have to type and hence typo...







From: "James Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:32:07 -0500

> From: francis A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I
> have worked in
> three project for past 15 months and all are big players in
> the industried
> today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere
> z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when
> compared to all those
> S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.

Soon to be unwrapt?  Actually, there is no english word that matches
that pattern, according to my crossword-solving program.  Would you like
to buy a vowel?  Perhaps you meant b*n*r*pt?

James Turner
Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Author:
MySQL & JSP Web Applications:
Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002

Co-Author:
Struts Kick Start
ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002

Forthcoming:
JavaServer Faces Kick Start
SAMS, Fall 2003



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 



_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE]

It was a real question.  No offense :)

-Dave

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in 
> the abyss
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Is that your real name?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant
> > facetiousness is being lost in a sea of literalism these 
> > days.  You must be so depressed. :)
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:50 AM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > No, IBM doesn't make cars.  They make computers.
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:48 PM
> > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, AS/400 Cars...;)
> > > > 
> > > >  --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > IBM
> > > > makes cars?
> > > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now if they could just make 1 decent car...
> > > > > 
> > > > > >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:58:47 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts
> > > > 1.1 provided
> > > > > >by and supported by IBM.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > 
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en 
> français ! 
> > > > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[Mark Galbreath]

Up the dosage

-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:28 PM

Your message doesn't make any sense.

>From: "francis A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:19:04 -0500
>
>ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I have worked 
>in
>three project for past 15 months and all are big players in the industried 
>today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
>z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when compared to all those

>S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT]Good News

[Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE]

Certain elements with the USAF, mine is the only one I know of :-), are using Struts.  
I'm not sure if this decision went all the way to President Bush or not.  Seems like 
it would have.

-Dave

> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT]Good News
> 
> 
> I can confirm at least one, I just got a gig with a big insurance
> company based primarily on use of Struts to meet cost and timeline
> requirements.
> 
> Michael Oliver
> AppsAsPeers LLC
> 7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
> Tucson, AZ 85747
> Phone:(520)574-1150
> Fax:(520)844-1036
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:45 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: [OT]Good News
> 
> 
> 
> Just got a call from a recruiter. He told me that hiring is picking up
> for
> java in general and especially for anyone with Struts 
> experience. A lot
> of
> his big company customers are beginning to staff Struts projects.
> 
> Definitely a testament to the hard work of all the commiters - great
> work!
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> 
> --
> --
> ---
> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is 
> intended for the
> use
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
> from
> disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified
> that
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
> strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication 
> in error,
> please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.
> --
> --
> ---
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [TILES] Help with trademark symbol

[Paul Linden]

Or, as Gourav pointed out, use ™ or ™ instead 
(http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/entities/)

Paul Linden wrote:

The tiles config file is XML, so the parser is trying to reference 
™ before it even gets to the web page. Try using ™ 
instead.

Paul

Wendy Smoak wrote:

I have a tile definition:

   
   
 

And on startup, I get Apache Tomcat/4.1.18-LE-jdk14
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Reference to undefined entity "™"

Since the 'heading' is inserted into an HTML page, I don't know how 
else to
get the little trademark symbol to appear.  Any ideas?

Thanks,

 




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Error Loading Application Resources in Struts 1.1

[James Mitchell]

Yes, well that version I did was a 1.1b1 version of the example
app.maybe I should verify with the nightlyneed to finish my
assigned bug first.


--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org/

"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who
cannot read them."
- Mark Twain (1835-1910)







> -Original Message-
> From: Micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:15 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Error Loading Application Resources in Struts 1.1
> 
> 
> Hi, again, James,
> 
> I was just trying to move Ted Husted's so that it worked in 
> struts 1.1 and 
> so that it had the jsp pages inside the WEB-INF.  I think we 
> may be seeing 
> a bug, but am not sure yet.
> 
> Micael
> 
> At 06:13 PM 1/22/03 -0500, you wrote:
> >Not sure what app you are working on, but I modified the 
> struts-example
> >to put the jsp files under WEB-INFis that what you are
> >doing/testing?
> >
> >A zip is available for download if you would like to see it:
> >
> >   http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta/downloads/
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >James Mitchell
> >Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
> >http://www.open-tools.org/
> >
> >"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over 
> the man who
> >cannot read them."
> > - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:03 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: Error Loading Application Resources in Struts 1.1
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, James,
> > >
> > > It is there.  I am starting to think that the message
> > > resources part of the
> > > struts-config is not the problem.  The whole configuration is
> > > below.  You
> > > see any other troubles?
> > >
> > > Micael mac Grene
> > >
> > > 
> > >  > >"-//Apache Software Foundation//DTD Struts
> > > Configuration 1.1//EN"
> > >
> > > "http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_1.dtd";>
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >   > >  name="logonForm"
> > >  type="app.LogonForm"/>
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >  
> > >   > >  name="logoff"
> > >  path="/logoff.do"/>
> > >   > >  name="logon"
> > >  path="/logon.do"/>
> > >  
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >   > >  path=/logon"
> > >  type="org.apache.struts.actions.ActionForward"
> > >  parameter="/WEB-INF/jsp/logon/logon.jsp"/>
> > >
> > >   > >  path="/logonSubmit"
> > >  type="com.michaelmcgrady.page.action.LogonAction"
> > >  name="logonForm"
> > >  scope="request"
> > >  validate="true"
> > >  input="/WEB-INF/jsp/logon/logon.jsp">
> > >   > >  name="success"
> > >  path="/WEB-INF/jsp/welcome/welcome.jsp"/>
> > >  
> > >
> > >   > >  path="/logoff"
> > >  type="com.michaelmcgrady.page.action.LogoffAction">
> > >   > >  name="success"
> > >  path="/WEB-INF/jsp/welcome/welcome.jsp"/>
> > >  
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >  > >  debug="3"
> > >  locale="true"
> > >  nocache="true"
> > >
> > > processorClass="org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor"/>
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >  > > null="false"/>
> > >  > > parameter="resources.images"
> > > null="false"/>
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > 
> > > > > value="/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml,/WEB-INF/xml/validation.xml"/>
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > At 05:49 PM 1/22/03 -0500, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >Check the .war file to see if the file is actually there.
> > > >Make sure your build process is actually copying the files
> > > to be war'd.
> > > >
> > > >It has happened in the past that my build script was not 
> doing this.
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >James Mitchell
> > > >Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
> > > >http://www.open-tools.org/
> > > >
> > > >"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over
> > > the man who
> > > >cannot read them."
> > > > - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:46 PM
> > > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > > > Subject: RE: Error Loading Application Resources in Struts 1.1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for catching that, Wendy, but that was just a
> > > typo.  The site
> > > > > actually does not have that mistake.  Any other ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > > Micael
> > > > >
> > > > > At 03:37 PM 1/22/03 -0700, you wrote:
> 

RE: [OT]Good News

[Mike Oliver]

I can confirm at least one, I just got a gig with a big insurance
company based primarily on use of Struts to meet cost and timeline
requirements.

Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:45 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: [OT]Good News



Just got a call from a recruiter. He told me that hiring is picking up
for
java in general and especially for anyone with Struts experience. A lot
of
his big company customers are beginning to staff Struts projects.

Definitely a testament to the hard work of all the commiters - great
work!

Kevin




---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified
that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.

---




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mark Galbreath]

There are those on the precipice, and then there are those in the abyss

-Original Message-
From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford


Is that your real name?

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:57 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> 
> 
> Mark, I believe your particular brand of flippant
> facetiousness is being lost in a sea of literalism these 
> days.  You must be so depressed. :)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:50 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > 
> > 
> > No, IBM doesn't make cars.  They make computers.
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:48 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, AS/400 Cars...;)
> > > 
> > >  --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > IBM
> > > makes cars?
> > > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
> > > > 
> > > > Now if they could just make 1 decent car...
> > > > 
> > > > >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:58:47 -0500
> > > > >
> > > > >The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts
> > > 1.1 provided
> > > > >by and supported by IBM.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > 
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > 
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! 
> > > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [OT] Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

[Mark Galbreath]

Don't they require drivers, too?

-Original Message-
From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:50 PM

No, IBM doesn't make cars.  They make computers.

> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:48 PM
> 
> Yes, AS/400 Cars...;)
> 
>  --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > 
> IBM makes cars?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:05 PM
> > 
> > Now if they could just make 1 decent car...
> > 
> > >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:58:47 -0500
> > >
> > >The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts
> 1.1 provided
> > >by and supported by IBM.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [TILES] Help with trademark symbol

[Paul Linden]

The tiles config file is XML, so the parser is trying to reference 
™ before it even gets to the web page. Try using ™ instead.

Paul

Wendy Smoak wrote:

I have a tile definition:

   
   
 

And on startup, I get 
Apache Tomcat/4.1.18-LE-jdk14
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Reference to undefined entity "™"

Since the 'heading' is inserted into an HTML page, I don't know how else to
get the little trademark symbol to appear.  Any ideas?

Thanks,

 




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [TILES] Help with trademark symbol

[Pani, Gourav]

have you tried the hash value?

-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:30 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: [TILES] Help with trademark symbol



I have a tile definition:



  

And on startup, I get 
Apache Tomcat/4.1.18-LE-jdk14
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Reference to undefined entity "™"

Since the 'heading' is inserted into an HTML page, I don't know how else to
get the little trademark symbol to appear.  Any ideas?

Thanks,

-- 
Wendy Smoak
Applications Systems Analyst, Sr.
Arizona State University PA Information Resources Management

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

[OT] RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[David Graham]

Your message doesn't make any sense.

David







From: "francis A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:19:04 -0500

ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I have worked in 
three project for past 15 months and all are big players in the industried 
today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when compared to all those 
S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.






From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:14 -0500

Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and Linux/Intel is 
in for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be deployed on 
Linux here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate from 
Solaris --> Linux

---
- Nayan Hajratwala
- Chikli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com


-Original Message-
From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford


Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear Open Source
initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and other Open
Source technologies.

Ilya

-Original Message-
From: Mark Lepkowski
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford

I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  It sounds to
me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they started with
to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
common base.

- Original Message -
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford


> It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat unfortunate
> that they stopped at b2.
(snip)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
>

(snip)

> 
> The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
provided
> by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts provided by IBM
> with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
> provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be supporting the
> versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application teams should NOT
be
> downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are encouraged to use
> the website for learning and documentation.
> 
>
(snip)


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 



_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 



_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: Problem with unused Formbean-Properties

[Craig R. McClanahan]

On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Andreas Langmann wrote:

> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:46:33 +0100
> From: Andreas Langmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Problem with unused Formbean-Properties
>
> Hello,
>
> i have a formBean which has a property id. this id is not shown to the user
> and it has no associated input field. If the user posts the FormData the id
> contains the prior value - as expected. But since we implemented the
> "reset()" method in every formBean, struts calls this method and deletes my
> id.
>
> What i need is that struts uses the formBean for displaying the Page and
> posting the data without calling reset... i thought this could be handled
> with the param scope (session/request) but struts calls reset anyway...
>
> I need to store this id field from the get-request and access it in the post
> request but i dont want to store it as attribute...
>
> any ideas?
>

Omitting the reset() is not a good idea -- the least of your problems is
that checkboxes won't work any more.

Even though you don't want the id field displayed, you can make it part of
the incoming form by using a hidden field (with ).  That way,
it gets populated with the correct value just like everything else.

> thanks
>
> Andreas Langmann
>

Craig



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[James Mitchell]

You're probably right.


--
James "'97 Chevy Blazer and 2003 Dodge" Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org/

"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who
cannot read them."
- Mark Twain (1835-1910)




> -Original Message-
> From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
> 
> 
> He sure doesn't sound like someone who drives a Ford!
> 
> Simon "95 Ford Probe GT 24v and happy about it" Chappell
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:25 PM
> >To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
> >
> >
> >Let me guess..you work for GM?
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >James Mitchell
> >Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
> >http://www.open-tools.org/
> >
> >"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over 
> the man who
> >cannot read them."
> > - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: francis A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:19 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I 
> >> have worked in 
> >> three project for past 15 months and all are big players in 
> >> the industried 
> >> today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
> >> z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when 
> >> compared to all those 
> >> S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" 
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >> >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:14 -0500
> >> >
> >> >Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and 
> >> Linux/Intel is in 
> >> >for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be 
> >> deployed on Linux 
> >> >here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate 
> >> from Solaris --> 
> >> >Linux
> >> >
> >> >---
> >> >- Nayan Hajratwala
> >> >- Chikli Consulting LLC
> >> >- http://www.chikli.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
> >> >To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
> >> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear 
> >> Open Source
> >> >initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and 
> >> other Open
> >> >Source technologies.
> >> >
> >> >Ilya
> >> >
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: Mark Lepkowski
> >> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >> >Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
> >> >Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >> >
> >> >I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  
> >> It sounds to
> >> >me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they 
> >> started with
> >> >to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
> >> >common base.
> >> >
> >> >- Original Message -
> >> >From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
> >> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat 
> >> unfortunate
> >> > > that they stopped at b2.
> >> >(snip)
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
> >> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >> > > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >(snip)
> >> >
> >> > > 
> >> > > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
> >> >provided
> >> > > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts 
> >> provided by IBM
> >> > > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks 
> and services
> >> > > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be 
> >supporting the
> >> > > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application 
> >> teams should NOT
> >> >be
> >> > > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are 
> >> encouraged to use
> >> > > the website for learning and documentation.
> >> > > 
> >> > >
> >> >(snip)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> >
> >> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> >> >
> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: 
> >> >
> >> 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[Pani, Gourav]

Simon,

You need to get the BBC Micro-Powered El Cameno...  

Sorry, is it Friday yet???

-Original Message-
From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what


He sure doesn't sound like someone who drives a Ford!

Simon "95 Ford Probe GT 24v and happy about it" Chappell

>-Original Message-
>From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:25 PM
>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
>
>
>Let me guess..you work for GM?
>
>
>
>--
>James Mitchell
>Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
>http://www.open-tools.org/
>
>"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who
>cannot read them."
>   - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: francis A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:19 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
>> 
>> 
>> ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I 
>> have worked in 
>> three project for past 15 months and all are big players in 
>> the industried 
>> today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
>> z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when 
>> compared to all those 
>> S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:14 -0500
>> >
>> >Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and 
>> Linux/Intel is in 
>> >for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be 
>> deployed on Linux 
>> >here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate 
>> from Solaris --> 
>> >Linux
>> >
>> >---
>> >- Nayan Hajratwala
>> >- Chikli Consulting LLC
>> >- http://www.chikli.com
>> >
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
>> >To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
>> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>> >
>> >Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear 
>> Open Source
>> >initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and 
>> other Open
>> >Source technologies.
>> >
>> >Ilya
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Mark Lepkowski
>> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> >Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
>> >Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>> >I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  
>> It sounds to
>> >me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they 
>> started with
>> >to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
>> >common base.
>> >
>> >- Original Message -
>> >From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
>> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>> >
>> > > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat 
>> unfortunate
>> > > that they stopped at b2.
>> >(snip)
>> > >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
>> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> > > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > >
>> >
>> >(snip)
>> >
>> > > 
>> > > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
>> >provided
>> > > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts 
>> provided by IBM
>> > > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
>> > > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be 
>supporting the
>> > > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application 
>> teams should NOT
>> >be
>> > > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are 
>> encouraged to use
>> > > the website for learning and documentation.
>> > > 
>> > >
>> >(snip)
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >
>> >For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> >
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
>> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For 
>> additional commands, 
>> e-mail: 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail:



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[TILES] Help with trademark symbol

[Wendy Smoak]

I have a tile definition:



  

And on startup, I get 
Apache Tomcat/4.1.18-LE-jdk14
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Reference to undefined entity "™"

Since the 'heading' is inserted into an HTML page, I don't know how else to
get the little trademark symbol to appear.  Any ideas?

Thanks,

-- 
Wendy Smoak
Applications Systems Analyst, Sr.
Arizona State University PA Information Resources Management

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[James Turner]

> From: francis A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 

> ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I 
> have worked in 
> three project for past 15 months and all are big players in 
> the industried 
> today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
> z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when 
> compared to all those 
> S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.

Soon to be unwrapt?  Actually, there is no english word that matches
that pattern, according to my crossword-solving program.  Would you like
to buy a vowel?  Perhaps you meant b*n*r*pt?

James Turner
Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Author: 
MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002

Co-Author: 
Struts Kick Start
ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002

Forthcoming:
JavaServer Faces Kick Start 
SAMS, Fall 2003



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[Chappell, Simon P]

He sure doesn't sound like someone who drives a Ford!

Simon "95 Ford Probe GT 24v and happy about it" Chappell

>-Original Message-
>From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:25 PM
>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
>
>
>Let me guess..you work for GM?
>
>
>
>--
>James Mitchell
>Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
>http://www.open-tools.org/
>
>"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who
>cannot read them."
>   - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: francis A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:19 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
>> 
>> 
>> ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I 
>> have worked in 
>> three project for past 15 months and all are big players in 
>> the industried 
>> today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
>> z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when 
>> compared to all those 
>> S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:14 -0500
>> >
>> >Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and 
>> Linux/Intel is in 
>> >for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be 
>> deployed on Linux 
>> >here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate 
>> from Solaris --> 
>> >Linux
>> >
>> >---
>> >- Nayan Hajratwala
>> >- Chikli Consulting LLC
>> >- http://www.chikli.com
>> >
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
>> >To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
>> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>> >
>> >Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear 
>> Open Source
>> >initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and 
>> other Open
>> >Source technologies.
>> >
>> >Ilya
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Mark Lepkowski
>> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> >Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
>> >Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>> >I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  
>> It sounds to
>> >me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they 
>> started with
>> >to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
>> >common base.
>> >
>> >- Original Message -
>> >From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
>> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> >
>> >
>> > > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat 
>> unfortunate
>> > > that they stopped at b2.
>> >(snip)
>> > >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
>> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> > > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
>> > >
>> >
>> >(snip)
>> >
>> > > 
>> > > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
>> >provided
>> > > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts 
>> provided by IBM
>> > > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
>> > > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be 
>supporting the
>> > > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application 
>> teams should NOT
>> >be
>> > > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are 
>> encouraged to use
>> > > the website for learning and documentation.
>> > > 
>> > >
>> >(snip)
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >
>> >For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> >
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
>> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For 
>> additional commands, 
>> e-mail: 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what

[James Mitchell]

Let me guess..you work for GM?



--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org/

"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who
cannot read them."
- Mark Twain (1835-1910)







> -Original Message-
> From: francis A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford-->so what
> 
> 
> ford is not the "big" company which has deployed struts.I 
> have worked in 
> three project for past 15 months and all are big players in 
> the industried 
> today.And all the three company have deployed the app on websphere 
> z/os(os/390->mainframe)which is a very good news when 
> compared to all those 
> S***  to be *n**r*pt companies.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:14 -0500
> >
> >Yes, my understanding is that Solaris is out the door and 
> Linux/Intel is in 
> >for new stuff.  I believe that WebSphere 5.0 will only be 
> deployed on Linux 
> >here, so teams that want to upgrade will have to migrate 
> from Solaris --> 
> >Linux
> >
> >---
> >- Nayan Hajratwala
> >- Chikli Consulting LLC
> >- http://www.chikli.com
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
> >To: 'Mark Lepkowski '; 'Struts Users Mailing List '
> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >
> >
> >Hmmm, great.  I'm a consultant for Ford, they taken a clear 
> Open Source
> >initiative last year.  They are also implementing Linux and 
> other Open
> >Source technologies.
> >
> >Ilya
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Mark Lepkowski
> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >Sent: 1/23/03 11:16 AM
> >Subject: Re: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >
> >I didn't read anything in the quote the mentioned v1.1b2.  
> It sounds to
> >me like maybe IBM has tailored whatever beta version they 
> started with
> >to the point where they want their developers to use that as their
> >common base.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:08 PM
> >Subject: RE: Struts officially supported at Ford
> >
> >
> > > It's certainly good that they're using 1.1, but somewhat 
> unfortunate
> > > that they stopped at b2.
> >(snip)
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: Struts officially supported at Ford
> > >
> >
> >(snip)
> >
> > > 
> > > The Ford Servlet Framework is a packaged version of Struts 1.1
> >provided
> > > by and supported by IBM. This download includes Struts 
> provided by IBM
> > > with some custom integration of the other Frameworks and services
> > > provided by the Java COE. The Java COE will only be supporting the
> > > versions of Struts downloaded from here. Application 
> teams should NOT
> >be
> > > downloading Struts from the Jakarta website but are 
> encouraged to use
> > > the website for learning and documentation.
> > > 
> > >
> >(snip)
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> >
> >For additional commands, e-mail: 
> >
> 
> 
> _
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: