Re: [pfSense Support] Please don't switch to FreeBSD7 in pfSense1.2.1

2008-06-30 Thread Gary Buckmaster

Angelo Turetta wrote:

Chris Buechler wrote:

The serial console is your only concern? If that doesn't work with 7.0
and RELENG_1_2 for whatever reason we'll fix it.

We want to keep our latest stable release on the latest stable FreeBSD
release, but nothing is final on that yet.


Yes, I understand, but from FreeBSD6 to FreeBSD7 also the device 
drivers have changed so much and so has the scheduler, the memory 
allocation, the kernel threading


Angelo Turetta

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IMNSHO, device driver changes and tracking something close to current 
are good things.  There are so many devices that just don't have decent 
support in FreeBSD6 and some devices are simply broken in FreeBSD6.  
Given that 1.3 is a long ways off, it would seem to make sense to have 
1.2.1 track the most current stable FreeBSD branch possible.  But then I 
tend to trust the pfSense devs' decision making process. I've never seen 
them push out a general release that was anything less than extremely 
stable. 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Error while building pfSense on FreeBSD 6.3 and 7

2008-06-30 Thread Ahmed Abdallah
First of all I'd like to thank you guys for building such a wonderful
application, really it's very wonderful and your efforts are very
appreciated.
Second, I've been trying to build a fresh pfSense following the guide at
http://devwiki.pfsense.org/BuildingpFSense but I've faced alot of problems.

1- Currently I'm building it on FreeBSD 6.3 and found a problem saying
Find:: not found error code 127 and stopped in freesbie2.

2- I tried to build it on FreeBSD 7 and faced alot of problems, like saying
that the kernel option ALTQ-FAIRQ is unknown !!! and eventaully decided to
build it on FreeBSD 6.3

So, I've two questions:
1- What wrong happened in no 1. . What does Find:: not found mean and how
can I fix it ?
2- Is building PFSense on FreeBSD 7 possible now or not cause of your repo.
migration from cvs to git ??

Thanks and long live pfSense :)
-- 
Ahmed Abdalla
--Systems Engineer
Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C
Tel : +20 2 2527 6616
EXT : 806
Fax : +20 2 2526 1055
Mobile : +20 10 688 9009
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website : http://www.linux-plus.com


Re: [pfSense Support] Error while building pfSense on FreeBSD 6.3 and 7

2008-06-30 Thread Bill Marquette
I'm not sure how up to date that document is (and it looks like we
have a couple of 'build' docs on the wiki).  This one
http://devwiki.pfsense.org/DevelopersBootStrapAndDevIso has been gone
through a number of times by myself and had various fixes applied to
it.  You might try it out.

--Bill

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Ahmed Abdallah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 First of all I'd like to thank you guys for building such a wonderful
 application, really it's very wonderful and your efforts are very
 appreciated.
 Second, I've been trying to build a fresh pfSense following the guide at
 http://devwiki.pfsense.org/BuildingpFSense but I've faced alot of problems.

 1- Currently I'm building it on FreeBSD 6.3 and found a problem saying
 Find:: not found error code 127 and stopped in freesbie2.

 2- I tried to build it on FreeBSD 7 and faced alot of problems, like saying
 that the kernel option ALTQ-FAIRQ is unknown !!! and eventaully decided to
 build it on FreeBSD 6.3

 So, I've two questions:
 1- What wrong happened in no 1. . What does Find:: not found mean and how
 can I fix it ?
 2- Is building PFSense on FreeBSD 7 possible now or not cause of your repo.
 migration from cvs to git ??

 Thanks and long live pfSense :)
 --
 Ahmed Abdalla
 --Systems Engineer
 Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C
 Tel : +20 2 2527 6616
 EXT : 806
 Fax : +20 2 2526 1055
 Mobile : +20 10 688 9009
 email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 website : http://www.linux-plus.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error while building pfSense on FreeBSD 6.3 and 7

2008-06-30 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Please read the support@ mailing list archives before posting.  In the 
past few days the developers wrote that they are in the middle of making 
a major migration of the source code and that the build process should 
be very broken for awhile.  In short, you will not be able to 
successfully build pfSense until their migration is finished and a new 
developer's ISO is built.  There is no timeline for when this will happen. 


Ahmed Abdallah wrote:
First of all I'd like to thank you guys for building such a wonderful 
application, really it's very wonderful and your efforts are very 
appreciated.
Second, I've been trying to build a fresh pfSense following the guide 
at http://devwiki.pfsense.org/BuildingpFSense but I've faced alot of 
problems.


1- Currently I'm building it on FreeBSD 6.3 and found a problem saying
Find:: not found error code 127 and stopped in freesbie2.

2- I tried to build it on FreeBSD 7 and faced alot of problems, like 
saying that the kernel option ALTQ-FAIRQ is unknown !!! and eventaully 
decided to build it on FreeBSD 6.3


So, I've two questions:
1- What wrong happened in no 1. . What does Find:: not found mean 
and how can I fix it ?
2- Is building PFSense on FreeBSD 7 possible now or not cause of your 
repo. migration from cvs to git ??


Thanks and long live pfSense :)
--
Ahmed Abdalla
--Systems Engineer
Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C
Tel : +20 2 2527 6616
EXT : 806
Fax : +20 2 2526 1055
Mobile : +20 10 688 9009
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
website : http://www.linux-plus.com 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Network Adapter Compatibility - SuperMicro AOC-UG-I4?

2008-06-30 Thread Tim Nelson
Hello fellow pfSensers! I'm putting together a new build and want to see if any 
of you have experience with the SuperMicro AOC-UG-I4. It is a quad gigabit 
PCI-e X8 board based on the Intel 82571 chipset. I see the chipset is listed as 
being supported by FreeBSD 6.2 
(http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware-i386.html#ETHERNET). Any 
comments/experiences welcome. Thank you!

Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error while building pfSense on FreeBSD 6.3 and 7

2008-06-30 Thread Ahmed Abdallah
Thanks Bill for your reply.

 Please read the support@ mailing list archives before posting.  In the
 past few days the developers wrote that they are in the middle of making a
 major migration of the source code and that the build process should be very
 broken for awhile.  In short, you will not be able to successfully build
 pfSense until their migration is finished and a new developer's ISO is
 built.  There is no timeline for when this will happen.

Thanks Gary,and I surely read the mailing list, and found some stuff talking
about that but not in the past few days, but I also found some guys
talking about being able to build it successfully, so I didn't know if the
building process is still broken or not. Anyway, thanks for the reply


On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I'm not sure how up to date that document is (and it looks like we
 have a couple of 'build' docs on the wiki).  This one
 http://devwiki.pfsense.org/DevelopersBootStrapAndDevIso has been gone
 through a number of times by myself and had various fixes applied to
 it.  You might try it out.

 --Bill

 On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Ahmed Abdallah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  First of all I'd like to thank you guys for building such a wonderful
  application, really it's very wonderful and your efforts are very
  appreciated.
  Second, I've been trying to build a fresh pfSense following the guide at
  http://devwiki.pfsense.org/BuildingpFSense but I've faced alot of
 problems.
 
  1- Currently I'm building it on FreeBSD 6.3 and found a problem saying
  Find:: not found error code 127 and stopped in freesbie2.
 
  2- I tried to build it on FreeBSD 7 and faced alot of problems, like
 saying
  that the kernel option ALTQ-FAIRQ is unknown !!! and eventaully decided
 to
  build it on FreeBSD 6.3
 
  So, I've two questions:
  1- What wrong happened in no 1. . What does Find:: not found mean and
 how
  can I fix it ?
  2- Is building PFSense on FreeBSD 7 possible now or not cause of your
 repo.
  migration from cvs to git ??
 
  Thanks and long live pfSense :)
  --
  Ahmed Abdalla
  --Systems Engineer
  Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C
  Tel : +20 2 2527 6616
  EXT : 806
  Fax : +20 2 2526 1055
  Mobile : +20 10 688 9009
  email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  website : http://www.linux-plus.com

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Ahmed Abdalla
--Systems Engineer
Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C
Tel : +20 2 2527 6616
EXT : 806
Fax : +20 2 2526 1055
Mobile : +20 10 688 9009
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website : http://www.linux-plus.com


[pfSense Support] Re: WISPr Attributes

2008-06-30 Thread Kelvin Chiang

Hi, can anyone help with this?

Thanks

Kelvin Chiang wrote:

Hi,

I have seen from radius.inc that WISPr attributes seem to be supported, 
but I cannot get confirmation from the testing that WISPr attributes are 
currently supported. Can anyone enlighten me?


Regards, Kelvin



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error while building pfSense on FreeBSD 6.3 and 7

2008-06-30 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Check out the 6/23 email from Chris Buechler entitled: build_iso.sh 
Error during compiling.




Ahmed Abdallah wrote:
Thanks Gary,and I surely read the mailing list, and found some stuff 
talking about that but not in the past few days, but I also found 
some guys talking about being able to build it successfully, so I 
didn't know if the building process is still broken or not. Anyway, 
thanks for the reply



--
Ahmed Abdalla
--Systems Engineer
Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C
Tel : +20 2 2527 6616
EXT : 806
Fax : +20 2 2526 1055
Mobile : +20 10 688 9009
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
website : http://www.linux-plus.com 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Please don't switch to FreeBSD7 in pfSense1.2.1

2008-06-30 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Gary Buckmaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 IMNSHO, device driver changes and tracking something close to current are
 good things.  There are so many devices that just don't have decent support
 in FreeBSD6 and some devices are simply broken in FreeBSD6.

+1 - I would love to see the next release of pfSense based on FreeBSD
7.0. Just the hardware support alone is worth it, not to mention all
the work it has with regards to network performance.

-Dave

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Please don't switch to FreeBSD7 in pfSense1.2.1

2008-06-30 Thread Liam Farr
Can I please have it yesterday.

(Or traffic shaping inside OpenVPN).

Fantastic product, cant wait for all the new / improved features.

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:48 AM, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Gary Buckmaster
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  IMNSHO, device driver changes and tracking something close to current are
  good things.  There are so many devices that just don't have decent
 support
  in FreeBSD6 and some devices are simply broken in FreeBSD6.

 +1 - I would love to see the next release of pfSense based on FreeBSD
 7.0. Just the hardware support alone is worth it, not to mention all
 the work it has with regards to network performance.

 -Dave

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Kind Regards


Liam Farr

Director
Farr Networks Limited
Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +64-27-666-4644
Ph: +64-21-306-104
Fax: +64-9-925-2025


RE: [pfSense Support] Please don't switch to FreeBSD7 in pfSense1.2.1

2008-06-30 Thread Adam Van Ornum
I personally am looking forward to pfSense on FreeBSD7, however I also 
understand and agree with the original post for the most part.  Generally it 
seems that a release like 1.2.1 would be considered a maintenance release which 
would only cover bug fixes and the like so changing something as major as the 
base OS could be unexpected.
 
But, if 1.3 is going to be that far away then might as well go for it.  :)



 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:48:26 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
 support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Please don't switch to 
 FreeBSD7 in pfSense1.2.1  On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Gary Buckmaster 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  IMNSHO, device driver changes and tracking 
 something close to current are  good things. There are so many devices that 
 just don't have decent support  in FreeBSD6 and some devices are simply 
 broken in FreeBSD6.  +1 - I would love to see the next release of pfSense 
 based on FreeBSD 7.0. Just the hardware support alone is worth it, not to 
 mention all the work it has with regards to network performance.  -Dave  
 - To 
 unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_
The i’m Talkathon starts 6/24/08.  For now, give amongst yourselves.
http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_LearnMore_GiveAmongst

Re: [pfSense Support] Please don't switch to FreeBSD7 in pfSense1.2.1

2008-06-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Adam Van Ornum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I personally am looking forward to pfSense on FreeBSD7, however I also
 understand and agree with the original post for the most part.  Generally it
 seems that a release like 1.2.1 would be considered a maintenance release
 which would only cover bug fixes and the like so changing something as major
 as the base OS could be unexpected.

m0n0wall has done these types of switches many times with no ill-drama.

 But, if 1.3 is going to be that far away then might as well go for it.  :)

Yes.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]