SM 2.0: Can't send encrypted mails to myself
Hi, I have S/MIME certificates for several of my e-mail addresses which I imported under Manage Certificates - Your certificates. I can sign e-mails with these certificates and receive and send encrypted e-mails from/to other people but I can't send encrypted e-mails to myself. When I try to do so, SM 2.0 says Sending of message failed. You specified encryption for this message, but the application failed to find an encryption certificate for x...@y.z. I dare to say it's lying but why is that? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...
Benoit Renard wrote: Daniel wrote: Talk about Bloat!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all. The browser and composer always had to be installed. mailnews is no longer an option due to technical limitations. Everything else you can still opt to not install. Thanks for this, Benoit, I was under the impression it was All or Nothing!. Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.0 Can't Get Email, But Can Send Email
I've just installed SeaMonkey 2.0, imported all my old data, and started the new version. I have a couple of problems/questions: 1. I can send email, but when I click on the Get Msgs/Get All New Messages menu item, nothing happens. No status messages in the footer to show any activity, and the messages I can see in my webmail account inbox are not downloaded. If I start the old version it downloads the messages just fine. 2. When I start the email app, no folder is selected, so my Inbox emails don't appear in the right pane until I select the Inbox folder. I used to have the Inbox automatically opened when I started the app. How do I do this again? 3. When in Preferences/Mail Newsgroups/Composition I set the Default for HTML messages Font to Verdana, and then click OK. It doesn't seem to take reliably. If I go back again and check, the field is blank. I originally upgrades frm SM 1.1.11. I have now uninstalled SM 1.1.11 and 2.0, downloaded a fresh copy of SM 2.0 and re-installed it. I still get the same problems. I'm running Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP 3 Build 2600. Anyone have any ideas? JVH ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. This occurs with manual hyperlink entries or via Navigator File/Send Link. This behavior is different than SM1.x which only treated the space character as a word break. Is this by design or is it a bug ? Any way around this ? -- Regards, Art ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. This occurs with manual hyperlink entries or via Navigator File/Send Link. This behavior is different than SM1.x which only treated the space character as a word break. Is this by design or is it a bug ? Any way around this ? Have you tried bracketing the link as I've done in my signature below? -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. This occurs with manual hyperlink entries or via Navigator File/Send Link. This behavior is different than SM1.x which only treated the space character as a word break. Is this by design or is it a bug ? Any way around this ? Have you tried bracketing the link as I've done in my signature below? That's the way the Navigator File/Send Link command formats it. It has no effect on the results. This is only a problem when the number of characters in the link exceeds the character wrap length setting. A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap length: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break. -- Art ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
art: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Only while composing. ;) Look into your Sent Folder or write a PM to yourself to see what really was sent. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
On 11/20/09 11:25 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: art: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Only while composing. ;) Look into your Sent Folder or write a PM to yourself to see what really was sent. Hartmut Hartmut, you are correct :-). Thanks. The behavior of the mail composing window/pane is just different than in previous SM versions. Some further testing with long links shows that some, but not all non-alphanumeric characters will cause the line break during compose. The link that is sent will not have the line breaks. -- Art ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote: Double clicking does not work for me. I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
art wrote: On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote: /snip/ A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap length: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break. In viewing your message, the example link did indeed wrap in my message pane. However, the link was not broken. I clicked on it and the Mapquest map of Andover St. came right up. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Have downloaded and installed SM2 as advised by Leonidas Jones
To Leonidas Jones: I reluctantly tried again and installed SM2 to the default you mentioned. No, it did not take over my version 1.1.18 per se, but it DID take over the SeaMonkey Icon on my desktop! So I have to go through my Start button, click on Internet and my SeaMonkey 1.1.18 comes up fully functional! So, I have bitten the bullet, now I need to know how do I manually move Bookmarks, email and newsgroups to SM2,or should I wait until the first fix comes out next month? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple user/passwords
Phillip Jones wrote: BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following: BeeNeR: Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me. The page I use multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/ I have a couple of e-mail addresses that I use and I no longer get the drop down selection choice. Maybe a case of autocomplete=off? https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password Hartmut I don't think so since it does complete if I only enter the first letter. ie if I have two users starting with 'e' and I enter 'e' a drop down box appears with both users that start with 'e'. In 1.x versions I didn't have to enter anything. If I clicked on the user entry box I received a dropdown box with ALL users no matter what the spelling and I could click on the user I wanted. And BTW: anyone using username/passwords for Banks or CC companies shoul be using a Master password and have encryption turned on. This include even in your own house. To Newsgroup: Does one HAVE to use passwords at all? That is the basic question I have. If so, is there any good guidelines as to which to apply them to , outside of the obvious one of banks? O:-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Can't Post to Newsgroup
___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Subject: says it all. :) ... As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux distributions? +1 Why no 'official' 64bit linux build? Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of course): http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/ [seamonkey-2.0.1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 20-Nov-2009 02:5114M] Or use: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Build_Documentation to roll your own. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On or about 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following: On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote: Double clicking does not work for me. I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking. Not sure I can click slow enough for the system to determine it's not double clicking. And, come to think of it, I'm not too sure I can click fast enough for the system to distinguish double clicks from 2 separate clicks. -- Ed Is there ever a day when mattresses are NOT on sale? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple user/passwords
On or about 11/20/2009 1:02 PM, John Boyle typed the following: Phillip Jones wrote: BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following: BeeNeR: Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me. The page I use multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/ I have a couple of e-mail addresses that I use and I no longer get the drop down selection choice. Maybe a case of autocomplete=off? https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password Hartmut I don't think so since it does complete if I only enter the first letter. ie if I have two users starting with 'e' and I enter 'e' a drop down box appears with both users that start with 'e'. In 1.x versions I didn't have to enter anything. If I clicked on the user entry box I received a dropdown box with ALL users no matter what the spelling and I could click on the user I wanted. And BTW: anyone using username/passwords for Banks or CC companies shoul be using a Master password and have encryption turned on. This include even in your own house. To Newsgroup: Does one HAVE to use passwords at all? That is the basic question I have. If so, is there any good guidelines as to which to apply them to , outside of the obvious one of banks? O:-) Not sure about your question. Many sites require logins with passwords. And if you want to access those sites you must apply a user and password. Can you perhaps clarify your question? -- Ed If you took all the economists in the world and laid them end-to-end, it would be a pretty good idea. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:32 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: Yes I am glad to see consideration of putting a legitimate Forms Manager Back. I would prefer one that worked similar to the one in SM1.1.8; But one based on the form History Manager Plugin would do. OK there are actually two parts to the problem. 1. The form autofill functionality that fills forms up on a page. 2. The Form History Editor used to edit/delete/correct mistakes. The second is possibly solvable (with some restrictions) since it's just front end UI code. We could even crib off the Form History extension there. The first is more problematic since the code lives somewhere in toolkit and is written mostly in C++. The main caveat is that the toolkit form history implementation has no concept of a form (!!). In the old XPFE form filler for each unique webpage the component stored the URL and the fieldname/value pairs together. In the toolkit implementation only fieldname/value pairs are stored and these could be used for any webpage that contains those fields. Just to be sure it's clear what a useful form manager would do, it should be possible to fill out a form once, and save it with a form name, such that when I go to that form, there is a way (I'm carefully noting function rather than how to do it) to be offered the form(s) saved against this URL, using the names assigned when saved. Why this is useful: in case no one thinks that's generally useful, consider Amazon.com. I order books for me for pleasure reading, one set of values, I order a book or two for my daughter, same billing, different address and name for ship to. Then I order book to use for business, like my pleasure reading but different credit card. For business I order from several parts vendors like newegg.com, and ship repair parts to wherever they're needed. I want a form I use once for each location, and the ability to change a field in a saved form and save that in the same name. Does that clarify what a perfect forms manager could do? Handle one form by URL is not enough, change values for each field by clicking in the field is too slow and error prone. Handling multiple forms per URL, covering all filled fields, would be perfect for almost any use. And if there was only one saved form for a URL, autofill might be the right interface. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
On 11/20/09 12:29 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote: art wrote: On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote: /snip/ A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap length: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break. In viewing your message, the example link did indeed wrap in my message pane. However, the link was not broken. I clicked on it and the Mapquest map of Andover St. came right up. Lee, the consensus is that the wrapping is confined to the mail window/pane display during compose. The link is sent unwrapped and will appear that way in the copy in the Sent mail folder (see Hartmut Figge's posting in this thread). So it looks like this phenomena is just the way SM2 performs wrapping display during message compose. My original concern with the wrapping was that some mail clients don't handle wrapped links too gracefully :-). -- Art ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/19/2009 8:23 PM, Phillip Jones typed the following: JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? Do what's in this URL and it will return the SM1.1.8 style. http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-remember-passwords/ Tried that (see my thread in this news group: Multiple user/passwords). Didn't work. In addition go save this as a BookMarklet: Create new blank Bookmark give title as Remember Password. javascript:(function(){var%20ca,cea,cs,df,dfe,i,j,x,y;function%20n(i,what){return%20i+%22%20%22+what+((i==1)?%22%22:%22s%22)}ca=cea=cs=0;df=document.forms;for(i=0;idf.length;++i){x=df[i];dfe=x.elements;if(x.onsubmit){x.onsubmit=%22%22;++cs;}if(x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++ca;}for(j=0;jdfe.length;++j){y=dfe[j];if(y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++cea;}}}alert(%22Removed%20autocomplete=off%20from%20%22+n(ca,%22form%22)+%22%20and%20from%20%22+n(cea,%22form%20element%22)+%22,%20and%20removed%20onsubmit%20from%20%22+n(cs,%22form%22)+%22.%20After%20you%20type%20your%20password%20and%20submit%20the%20form,%20the%20browser%20will%20offer%20to%20remember%20your%20password.%22)})(); Put this on the bookmarks Bar. Then just before you aim to save as password click on this. the combination of this and the other will get you back almost to 1.1.8 action -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple user/passwords
John Boyle wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following: BeeNeR: Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me. The page I use multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/ I have a couple of e-mail addresses that I use and I no longer get the drop down selection choice. Maybe a case of autocomplete=off? https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password Hartmut I don't think so since it does complete if I only enter the first letter. ie if I have two users starting with 'e' and I enter 'e' a drop down box appears with both users that start with 'e'. In 1.x versions I didn't have to enter anything. If I clicked on the user entry box I received a dropdown box with ALL users no matter what the spelling and I could click on the user I wanted. And BTW: anyone using username/passwords for Banks or CC companies shoul be using a Master password and have encryption turned on. This include even in your own house. To Newsgroup: Does one HAVE to use passwords at all? That is the basic question I have. If so, is there any good guidelines as to which to apply them to , outside of the obvious one of banks? O:-) No. No one has to use a Master Password. But in order to encrypt your passwords you must. If you live in a City that never ever has any break-ins (Home invasions), and the neighbor on each side of you would trust with you Banking a Credit cards, you don't have to use a Mater Password. Suppose someone breaks into your house and swipes your Computers. If they can't get into your Browser, They can get your passwords. In fact its not a bad idea to put a secure Password on your Computer. I have two computers, and I have usernames and passwords on the computers and on each Browser I use. And my 85 year old mother is the only one that lives with me other than our cat. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey 2.0? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't Post to Newsgroup
On 11/20/2009 10:37 AM, u...@domain.invalid wrote: Hmmm, well, I half-believe you :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On 11/20/2009 12:18 PM, BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following: On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote: Double clicking does not work for me. I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking. Not sure I can click slow enough for the system to determine it's not double clicking. And, come to think of it, I'm not too sure I can click fast enough for the system to distinguish double clicks from 2 separate clicks. Why not? Depending on the Window system you're using, you should be able to configure how fast the second click must be to be considered a double-click vs. two single clicks. On the other hand, if you're trying to make a joke, I don't get it. Sorry. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/20/2009 3:59 PM, RGrannus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey? Yes. Yes ... and Yes. Actually, the default install location for SeaMonkey 2 is different than the default install location for SeaMonkey 1.X. That doesn't mean the default location is right for you, but just be aware. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
RGrannus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey? Just install it, it installs to a separate directory from 1.1.18 the only thing it will do is ask if you want or don't want to copy over your user profile if everything else goes correctly. -- Big Bill Massillon, Oh USA ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
RGrannus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey? That is exactly where it installs by default. It does not overwrite 1.1.18. Tony's point about desktop shortcuts is well taken. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2
art wrote: On 11/20/09 12:29 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote: art wrote: On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote: /snip/ A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap length: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break. In viewing your message, the example link did indeed wrap in my message pane. However, the link was not broken. I clicked on it and the Mapquest map of Andover St. came right up. Lee, the consensus is that the wrapping is confined to the mail window/pane display during compose. The link is sent unwrapped and will appear that way in the copy in the Sent mail folder (see Hartmut Figge's posting in this thread). So it looks like this phenomena is just the way SM2 performs wrapping display during message compose. My original concern with the wrapping was that some mail clients don't handle wrapped links too gracefully :-). The display is wrapping here in both the Message Pane, and when I open it on new window. It is geared to the widow size. If I increase the window to nearly full screen on a 24, it does not wrap, so clearly its not a hard wrap. The link does work, though as you point out in something other then SeaMonkey or TB, the bets are off. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On or about 11/20/2009 7:27 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following: On 11/20/2009 12:18 PM, BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following: On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote: Double clicking does not work for me. I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking. Not sure I can click slow enough for the system to determine it's not double clicking. And, come to think of it, I'm not too sure I can click fast enough for the system to distinguish double clicks from 2 separate clicks. Why not? Depending on the Window system you're using, you should be able to configure how fast the second click must be to be considered a double-click vs. two single clicks. On the other hand, if you're trying to make a joke, I don't get it. Sorry. No matter how slow or fast I click the only way I can get a drop-down menu in a 'user' box with more than one user is to start typing. -- Ed To succeed in politics, it is often necessary to rise above your principles. -Unknown ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple user/passwords RESOLVED
On or about 11/11/2009 7:50 PM, BeeNeR typed the following: Previous to ver 2.0 when I had more than one user and password for a site, I would get a drop-down box with all users listed and could select the one I wanted with one click. With 2.0 I have to enter at least one character before it shows me a drop-down box which only shows those entries starting with the entered character(s). Is there an option to go back to the 1.x way? Or do I have to live with this? Should there be a bug report or feature request? I have resolved this problem by running 1.1.18 when I need to go to a website where I have multiple user/passwords for access. No problem keeping both. Now, if there were only an easy way to remove the master password after having entered it. (: -- Ed Sometimes you have to be silent in order to be heard. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the upgrade to Windows 7. The problems: 1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not connect or something similar. These are sites such as Yahoo, Google, etc. 2. The size of the site showing on the screen typically has to be reduced to 75% in order to be able to see it without a lot of scrolling back and forth. I have tried reducing the size of the fonts, however this has had minimal effect. Is there a way to adjust SeaMonkey so that the screen will automatically be reduced ? I have tried SeaMonkey 1.18 - the program will not open/start 50% of the time. I have tried uninstalling, re-downloading and reinstalling SeaMonkey 2.0 with no difference in the problems. Thanks for any help. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0
Campy wrote: 2. The size of the site showing on the screen typically has to be reduced to 75% in order to be able to see it without a lot of scrolling back and forth. I have tried reducing the size of the fonts, however this has had minimal effect. Is there a way to adjust SeaMonkey so that the screen will automatically be reduced ? Campy: Do you have your Windows 7 set to enlarge the fonts to 150% (144 DPI) or more? If so, SeaMonkey 2 (and FireFox 3) will zoom all your web pages by a factor of two. If you decrease the font magnification to 125% (120 DPI) then this will not happen. The rationale for this behavior is that many web pages containing graphics do not display well when zoomed by non-integer factors, so the browser does not zoom until the requested text magnification is closer to 2.0 than 1.0. I personally think this behavior is a mistake when it causes the page to require horizontal scaling. -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. FWIW. I've got the ATT Worldnet iservers setup on SM 2.0. no problems noted. If port 995 is going to work on Outlook, its hard to imagine that it will not work in another mail client, such as Seamonkey or Thunderbird. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . No issues with standard ATT DSL here; still 995 w/pop.att.yahoo.com and 465 w/smtp.att.yahoo.com many email accounts via ATT. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Website problems
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/ Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification content=OaEYk1WjScjIOpwuOyxCWyPJhJk0F9byX3q7s6cgtOQ /link href=/App_Themes/Theme/CSSHandler.axd?page=JGiJdDpvd5mqQf4kon3jcktmlugEgTLeXrO97BQ6_M0zuv2f1x9gDI74u0-Lq79G0amp;t=-enbEn1smA5dIAmLvd63r98KRSZX9FhMgM3HF72lIjk1amp;p=11Ir3EFxTdMkv009Q5tOcQ2 type=text/css rel=stylesheet /meta name=description content=Up To The Minute Beef Cattle News amp; Information Ranging From Ranch To Retail //head ^ Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey