SM 2.0: Can't send encrypted mails to myself

2009-11-20 Thread Seth Plait

Hi,

I have S/MIME certificates for several of my e-mail addresses which I 
imported under Manage Certificates - Your certificates. I can sign 
e-mails with these certificates and receive and send encrypted e-mails 
from/to other people but I can't send encrypted e-mails to myself. When 
I try to do so, SM 2.0 says Sending of message failed. You specified 
encryption for this message, but the application failed to find an 
encryption certificate for x...@y.z. I dare to say it's lying but why is that?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel

Benoit Renard wrote:

Daniel wrote:
Talk about Bloat!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser 
if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided 
that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, 
chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all.


The browser and composer always had to be installed. mailnews is no 
longer an option due to technical limitations. Everything else you can 
still opt to not install.


Thanks for this, Benoit, I was under the impression it was All or 
Nothing!.


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM 2.0 Can't Get Email, But Can Send Email

2009-11-20 Thread user
I've just installed SeaMonkey 2.0, imported all my old data, and started 
the new version. I have a couple of problems/questions:


1. I can send email, but when I click on the Get Msgs/Get All New 
Messages menu item, nothing happens. No status messages in the footer to 
show any activity, and the messages I can see in my webmail account 
inbox are not downloaded. If I start the old version it downloads the 
messages just fine.


2. When I start the email app, no folder is selected, so my Inbox emails 
don't appear in the right pane until I select the Inbox folder. I used 
to have the Inbox automatically opened when I started the app. How do I 
do this again?


3. When in Preferences/Mail  Newsgroups/Composition I set the Default 
for HTML messages Font to Verdana, and then click OK.  It doesn't seem 
to take reliably. If I go back again and check, the field is blank.


I originally upgrades frm SM 1.1.11.  I have now uninstalled SM 1.1.11 
and 2.0, downloaded a fresh copy of SM 2.0 and re-installed it.  I still 
get the same problems.


I'm running Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP 3 Build 2600.

Anyone have any ideas?

JVH
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread art
When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break 
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain 
text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit 
the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. This occurs 
with manual hyperlink entries or via Navigator File/Send Link.


This behavior is different than SM1.x which only treated the space 
character as a word break.


Is this by design or is it a bug ? Any way around this ?
--
Regards,
Art
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread David E. Ross
On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote:
 When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break 
 delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain 
 text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit 
 the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. This occurs 
 with manual hyperlink entries or via Navigator File/Send Link.
 
 This behavior is different than SM1.x which only treated the space 
 character as a word break.
 
 Is this by design or is it a bug ? Any way around this ?

Have you tried bracketing the link as I've done in my signature below?

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to
extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other
Mozilla-related applications.  You can access Mozdev much
more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread art

On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote:


On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote:

 When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break
 delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain
 text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit
 the link before using it instead of just clicking on it. This occurs
 with manual hyperlink entries or via Navigator File/Send Link.

 This behavior is different than SM1.x which only treated the space
 character as a word break.

 Is this by design or is it a bug ? Any way around this ?


Have you tried bracketing the link as I've done in my signature below?

That's the way the Navigator File/Send Link command formats it. It has 
no effect on the results. This is only a problem when the number of 
characters in the link exceeds the character wrap length setting.


A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only 
character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a 
File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap 
length:


http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS

In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break.

--
Art

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread Hartmut Figge
art:

When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break 
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain 
text word wrap setting.

Only while composing. ;)

Look into your Sent Folder or write a PM to yourself to see what really
was sent.

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread art

On 11/20/09 11:25 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:


art:


When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain
text word wrap setting.


Only while composing. ;)

Look into your Sent Folder or write a PM to yourself to see what really
was sent.

Hartmut

Hartmut, you are correct :-). Thanks.

The behavior of the mail composing window/pane is just different than in 
previous SM versions. Some further testing with long links shows that 
some, but not all non-alphanumeric characters will cause the line break 
during compose. The link that is sent will not have the line breaks.


--
Art
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: ID Passwords

2009-11-20 Thread Mark Hansen
On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote:
 
 Double clicking does not work for me.
 

I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread Leonidas Jones

art wrote:

On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote:


On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote:

/snip/

A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only
character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a
File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap
length:

http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS


In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break.



In viewing your message, the example link did indeed wrap in my message 
pane.  However, the link was not broken.  I clicked on it and the 
Mapquest map of Andover St. came right up.


Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Have downloaded and installed SM2 as advised by Leonidas Jones

2009-11-20 Thread John Boyle
To Leonidas Jones: I reluctantly tried again and installed SM2 to the
default you mentioned. No, it did not take over my version 1.1.18 per
se, but it DID take over the SeaMonkey Icon on my desktop! So I have to
go through my Start button, click on Internet and my SeaMonkey 1.1.18
comes up fully functional! So, I have bitten the bullet, now I need to
know how do I manually move Bookmarks, email and newsgroups to SM2,or
should I wait until the first fix comes out next month?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Multiple user/passwords

2009-11-20 Thread John Boyle
Phillip Jones wrote:
 BeeNeR wrote:
 On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following:
 BeeNeR:

 Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me.  The page I
 use
 multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/  I have a couple of e-mail
 addresses that I use and I no longer get the drop down selection
 choice.

 Maybe a case of autocomplete=off?
 https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password

 Hartmut

 I don't think so since it does complete if I only enter the first
 letter.  ie if I have two users starting with 'e' and I enter 'e' a drop
 down box appears with both users that start with 'e'.

 In 1.x versions I didn't have to enter anything.  If I clicked on the
 user entry box I received a dropdown box with ALL users no matter what
 the spelling and I could click on the user I wanted.

 And BTW: anyone using username/passwords for Banks or CC companies
 shoul be using a Master password and have encryption turned on. This
 include even in your own house.

To Newsgroup: Does one HAVE to use passwords at all? That is the basic
question I have. If so, is there any good guidelines as to which to
apply them to , outside of the obvious one of banks? O:-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Can't Post to Newsgroup

2009-11-20 Thread user


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2009-11-20 Thread NoOp
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
 Subject: says it all. :)
...
 As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
 distributions?

+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?

Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of
course):
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/
[seamonkey-2.0.1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2  20-Nov-2009 02:5114M]

Or use:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Build_Documentation
to roll your own.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: ID Passwords

2009-11-20 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following:
 On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote:

 Double clicking does not work for me.

 
 I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking.

Not sure I can click slow enough for the system to determine it's not
double clicking.  And, come to think of it, I'm not too sure I can click
fast enough for the system to distinguish double clicks from 2 separate
clicks.

-- 
Ed

Is there ever a day when mattresses are NOT on sale?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Multiple user/passwords

2009-11-20 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 11/20/2009 1:02 PM, John Boyle typed the following:
 Phillip Jones wrote:
 BeeNeR wrote:
 On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following:
 BeeNeR:

 Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me.  The page I
 use
 multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/  I have a couple of e-mail
 addresses that I use and I no longer get the drop down selection
 choice.

 Maybe a case of autocomplete=off?
 https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password

 Hartmut

 I don't think so since it does complete if I only enter the first
 letter.  ie if I have two users starting with 'e' and I enter 'e' a drop
 down box appears with both users that start with 'e'.

 In 1.x versions I didn't have to enter anything.  If I clicked on the
 user entry box I received a dropdown box with ALL users no matter what
 the spelling and I could click on the user I wanted.

 And BTW: anyone using username/passwords for Banks or CC companies
 shoul be using a Master password and have encryption turned on. This
 include even in your own house.

 To Newsgroup: Does one HAVE to use passwords at all? That is the basic
 question I have. If so, is there any good guidelines as to which to
 apply them to , outside of the obvious one of banks? O:-)

Not sure about your question.  Many sites require logins with passwords.
And if you want to access those sites you must apply a user and
password.  Can you perhaps clarify your question?

-- 
Ed

If you took all the economists in the world and laid them end-to-end, it
would be a pretty good idea.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Restore the old Form Manager!

2009-11-20 Thread Bill Davidsen

Philip Chee wrote:

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:32 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:

Yes I am glad to see consideration of putting a legitimate Forms Manager 
Back. I would prefer one that worked similar to the one in SM1.1.8; But 
one based on the form History Manager Plugin would do.


OK there are actually two parts to the problem.

1. The form autofill functionality that fills forms up on a page.

2. The Form History Editor used to edit/delete/correct mistakes.

The second is possibly solvable (with some restrictions) since it's just
front end UI code. We could even crib off the Form History extension there.

The first is more problematic since the code lives somewhere in toolkit
and is written mostly in C++.

The main caveat is that the toolkit form history implementation has no
concept of a form (!!). In the old XPFE form filler for each unique
webpage the component stored the URL and the fieldname/value pairs
together. In the toolkit implementation only fieldname/value pairs are
stored and these could be used for any webpage that contains those fields.

Just to be sure it's clear what a useful form manager would do, it should be 
possible to fill out a form once, and save it with a form name, such that when I 
go to that form, there is a way (I'm carefully noting function rather than how 
to do it) to be offered the form(s) saved against this URL, using the names 
assigned when saved.


Why this is useful: in case no one thinks that's generally useful, consider 
Amazon.com. I order books for me for pleasure reading, one set of values, I 
order a book or two for my daughter, same billing, different address and name 
for ship to. Then I order book to use for business, like my pleasure reading but 
different credit card.


For business I order from several parts vendors like newegg.com, and ship repair 
parts to wherever they're needed. I want a form I use once for each location, 
and the ability to change a field in a saved form and save that in the same name.


Does that clarify what a perfect forms manager could do? Handle one form by URL 
is not enough, change values for each field by clicking in the field is too slow 
and error prone. Handling multiple forms per URL, covering all filled fields, 
would be perfect for almost any use. And if there was only one saved form for a 
URL, autofill might be the right interface.


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread art

On 11/20/09 12:29 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:


art wrote:

 On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote:


 On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote:

/snip/

 A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only
 character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a
 File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap
 length:

 
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS


 In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break.



In viewing your message, the example link did indeed wrap in my message
pane.  However, the link was not broken.  I clicked on it and the
Mapquest map of Andover St. came right up.

Lee, the consensus is that the wrapping is confined to the mail 
window/pane display during compose. The link is sent unwrapped and will 
appear that way in the copy in the Sent mail folder (see Hartmut Figge's 
posting in this thread). So it looks like this phenomena is just the way 
SM2 performs wrapping display during message compose.


My original concern with the wrapping was that some mail clients don't 
handle wrapped links too gracefully :-).


--
Art
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: ID Passwords

2009-11-20 Thread Phillip Jones

BeeNeR wrote:

On or about 11/19/2009 8:23 PM, Phillip Jones typed the following:

JohnW-Mpls wrote:


For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I
first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the
password.

SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted
in when arriving at a controlled site.

Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing?




Do what's in this URL and it will return the SM1.1.8 style.

http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-remember-passwords/



Tried that (see my thread in this news group: Multiple user/passwords).
Didn't work.

In addition  go save this as a BookMarklet: Create new blank Bookmark 
give title as Remember Password.


javascript:(function(){var%20ca,cea,cs,df,dfe,i,j,x,y;function%20n(i,what){return%20i+%22%20%22+what+((i==1)?%22%22:%22s%22)}ca=cea=cs=0;df=document.forms;for(i=0;idf.length;++i){x=df[i];dfe=x.elements;if(x.onsubmit){x.onsubmit=%22%22;++cs;}if(x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++ca;}for(j=0;jdfe.length;++j){y=dfe[j];if(y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++cea;}}}alert(%22Removed%20autocomplete=off%20from%20%22+n(ca,%22form%22)+%22%20and%20from%20%22+n(cea,%22form%20element%22)+%22,%20and%20removed%20onsubmit%20from%20%22+n(cs,%22form%22)+%22.%20After%20you%20type%20your%20password%20and%20submit%20the%20form,%20the%20browser%20will%20offer%20to%20remember%20your%20password.%22)})();


Put this on the bookmarks Bar. Then just before you aim to save as 
password click on this.


the combination of this and the other will get you back almost to 1.1.8 
action

--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Multiple user/passwords

2009-11-20 Thread Phillip Jones

John Boyle wrote:

Phillip Jones wrote:

BeeNeR wrote:

On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following:

BeeNeR:


Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me.  The page I
use
multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/  I have a couple of e-mail
addresses that I use and I no longer get the drop down selection
choice.


Maybe a case of autocomplete=off?
https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password

Hartmut


I don't think so since it does complete if I only enter the first
letter.  ie if I have two users starting with 'e' and I enter 'e' a drop
down box appears with both users that start with 'e'.

In 1.x versions I didn't have to enter anything.  If I clicked on the
user entry box I received a dropdown box with ALL users no matter what
the spelling and I could click on the user I wanted.


And BTW: anyone using username/passwords for Banks or CC companies
shoul be using a Master password and have encryption turned on. This
include even in your own house.


To Newsgroup: Does one HAVE to use passwords at all? That is the basic
question I have. If so, is there any good guidelines as to which to
apply them to , outside of the obvious one of banks? O:-)


No. No one has to use a Master Password. But in order to encrypt your 
passwords you must.


If you live in a City that never ever has any break-ins (Home 
invasions), and the neighbor on each side of you would trust with you 
Banking a Credit cards, you don't have to use a Mater Password.


Suppose someone breaks into your house and swipes your Computers. If 
they can't get into your Browser, They can get your passwords. In fact 
its not a bad idea to put a secure Password on your Computer.


I have two computers, and I have usernames and passwords on the 
computers  and on each Browser I use. And my 85 year old mother is the 
only one that lives with me other than our cat.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-20 Thread RGrannus

Leonidas Jones wrote:

OldCroc wrote:

The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is
important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either
Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done
by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I
do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't
want to lose!


It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. 
 The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state 
your question in full in the body of the message.


Just install it.



Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 
without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else?  Right now, 1.1.18 is 
in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey.  Do I just install 
2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey 2.0?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-20 Thread RGrannus

Leonidas Jones wrote:

OldCroc wrote:

The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is
important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either
Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done
by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I
do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't
want to lose!


It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. 
 The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state 
your question in full in the body of the message.


Just install it.


Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 
without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else?  Right now, 1.1.18 is 
in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey.  Do I just install 
2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-20 Thread RGrannus

Leonidas Jones wrote:

OldCroc wrote:

The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is
important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either
Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done
by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I
do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't
want to lose!


It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. 
 The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state 
your question in full in the body of the message.


Just install it.


Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 
without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else?  Right now, 1.1.18 is 
in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey.  Do I just install 
2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Can't Post to Newsgroup

2009-11-20 Thread Mark Hansen
On 11/20/2009 10:37 AM, u...@domain.invalid wrote:

Hmmm, well, I half-believe you :-)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: ID Passwords

2009-11-20 Thread Mark Hansen
On 11/20/2009 12:18 PM, BeeNeR wrote:
 On or about 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following:
 On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote:

 Double clicking does not work for me.

 
 I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking.
 
 Not sure I can click slow enough for the system to determine it's not
 double clicking.  And, come to think of it, I'm not too sure I can click
 fast enough for the system to distinguish double clicks from 2 separate
 clicks.
 

Why not? Depending on the Window system you're using, you should be
able to configure how fast the second click must be to be considered
a double-click vs. two single clicks.

On the other hand, if you're trying to make a joke, I don't get it.
Sorry.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-20 Thread Mark Hansen
On 11/20/2009 3:59 PM, RGrannus wrote:
 Leonidas Jones wrote:
 OldCroc wrote:
 The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is
 important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either
 Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done
 by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I
 do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't
 want to lose!
 
 It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. 
  The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state 
 your question in full in the body of the message.
 
 Just install it.
 
 Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 
 without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else?  Right now, 1.1.18 is 
 in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey.  Do I just install 
 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey?

Yes. Yes ... and Yes.

Actually, the default install location for SeaMonkey 2 is different than
the default install location for SeaMonkey 1.X. That doesn't mean the
default location is right for you, but just be aware.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-20 Thread William Morrison



RGrannus wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

OldCroc wrote:

The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is
important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either
Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done
by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I
do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't
want to lose!


It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line 
only.  The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, 
then state your question in full in the body of the message.


Just install it.


Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0 
without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else?  Right now, 1.1.18 
is in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey.  Do I just 
install 2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey?
Just install it, it installs to a separate directory from 1.1.18 the 
only thing it will do is ask if you want or don't want to copy over your 
user profile if everything else goes correctly.


--
Big Bill
Massillon, Oh USA


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-20 Thread Leonidas Jones

RGrannus wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

OldCroc wrote:

The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is
important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either
Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done
by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I
do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't
want to lose!


It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line
only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line,
then state your question in full in the body of the message.

Just install it.


Sorry if this seems elementary, but specifically, how do I install 2.0
without interfering with 1.1.18 or anything else? Right now, 1.1.18 is
in the folder C:Program files\Mozilla.org\Sea Monkey. Do I just install
2.0 in another folder Program files\Sea Monkey?


That is exactly where it installs by default. It does not overwrite 1.1.18.

Tony's point about desktop shortcuts is well taken.

Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-20 Thread Leonidas Jones

art wrote:

On 11/20/09 12:29 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:


art wrote:

On 11/20/09 10:50 AM, David E. Ross wrote:


On 11/20/2009 6:37 AM, art wrote:

/snip/

A further investigation indicates that the / may not be the only
character acting as a word break. The following Mapquest link via a
File/Send Link command formats it as follows with a 72 character wrap
length:

http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Danversstate=MAaddress=1+Andover+Stzipcode=01923-1412country=USlatitude=42.549802longitude=-70.954239geocode=ADDRESS



In this case, the ampersand () is being sensed as a word break.



In viewing your message, the example link did indeed wrap in my message
pane. However, the link was not broken. I clicked on it and the
Mapquest map of Andover St. came right up.


Lee, the consensus is that the wrapping is confined to the mail
window/pane display during compose. The link is sent unwrapped and will
appear that way in the copy in the Sent mail folder (see Hartmut Figge's
posting in this thread). So it looks like this phenomena is just the way
SM2 performs wrapping display during message compose.

My original concern with the wrapping was that some mail clients don't
handle wrapped links too gracefully :-).



The display is wrapping here in both the Message Pane, and when I open 
it on new window.  It is geared to the widow size.  If I increase the 
window to nearly full screen on a 24, it does not wrap, so clearly its 
not a hard wrap.  The link does work, though as you point out in 
something other then SeaMonkey or TB, the bets are off.


Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: ID Passwords

2009-11-20 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 11/20/2009 7:27 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following:
 On 11/20/2009 12:18 PM, BeeNeR wrote:
 On or about 11/20/2009 12:14 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following:
 On 11/19/2009 4:00 PM, BeeNeR wrote:

 Double clicking does not work for me.


 I believe folks have said two clicks, not double-clicking.

 Not sure I can click slow enough for the system to determine it's not
 double clicking.  And, come to think of it, I'm not too sure I can click
 fast enough for the system to distinguish double clicks from 2 separate
 clicks.

 
 Why not? Depending on the Window system you're using, you should be
 able to configure how fast the second click must be to be considered
 a double-click vs. two single clicks.
 
 On the other hand, if you're trying to make a joke, I don't get it.
 Sorry.
 
No matter how slow or fast I click the only way I can get a drop-down
menu in a 'user' box with more than one user is to start typing.

-- 
Ed

To succeed in politics, it is often necessary
to rise above your principles.   -Unknown
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Multiple user/passwords RESOLVED

2009-11-20 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 11/11/2009 7:50 PM, BeeNeR typed the following:
 Previous to ver 2.0 when I had more than one user and password for a
 site, I would get a drop-down box with all users listed and could select
 the one I wanted with one click.
 
 With 2.0 I have to enter at least one character before it shows me a
 drop-down box which only shows those entries starting with the entered
 character(s).
 
 Is there an option to go back to the 1.x way?  Or do I have to live with
 this?  Should there be a bug report or feature request?
 

I have resolved this problem by running 1.1.18 when I need to go to a
website where I have multiple user/passwords for access.  No problem
keeping both.   Now, if there were only an easy way to remove the master
password after having entered it. (:

-- 
Ed

Sometimes you have to be silent in order to be heard.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0

2009-11-20 Thread Campy
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the
upgrade to Windows 7.

The problems:

1.  I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it
will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not
connect or something similar.  These are sites such as Yahoo, Google,
etc.

2.  The size of the site showing on the screen typically has to be
reduced to 75% in order to be able to see it without a lot of
scrolling back and forth.  I have tried reducing the size of the
fonts, however this has had minimal effect.  Is there a way to adjust
SeaMonkey so that the screen will automatically be reduced ?

I have tried SeaMonkey 1.18 - the program will not open/start 50% of
the time.

I have tried uninstalling, re-downloading and reinstalling SeaMonkey
2.0 with no difference in the problems.

Thanks for any help.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0

2009-11-20 Thread David Wilkinson

Campy wrote:

2.  The size of the site showing on the screen typically has to be
reduced to 75% in order to be able to see it without a lot of
scrolling back and forth.  I have tried reducing the size of the
fonts, however this has had minimal effect.  Is there a way to adjust
SeaMonkey so that the screen will automatically be reduced ?


Campy:

Do you have your Windows 7 set to enlarge the fonts to 150% (144 DPI) or more? 
If so, SeaMonkey 2 (and FireFox 3) will zoom all your web pages by a factor of 
two. If you decrease the font magnification to 125% (120 DPI) then this will not 
happen.


The rationale for this behavior is that many web pages containing graphics do 
not display well when zoomed by non-integer factors, so the browser does not 
zoom until the requested text magnification is closer to 2.0 than 1.0. I 
personally think this behavior is a mistake when it causes the page to require 
horizontal scaling.


--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-20 Thread Leonidas Jones

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Bush wrote:


Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but
they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must
use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed
Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18
Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17

None of the above can use SSL

Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area .


I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.

SM 1.1.16.

FWIW.



I've got the ATT Worldnet iservers setup on SM 2.0. no problems noted.

If port 995 is going to work on Outlook, its hard to imagine that it 
will not work in another mail client, such as Seamonkey or Thunderbird.


Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-20 Thread NoOp
On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote:
 Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They 
 No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they 
 Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 
 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
   This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed
 Same with my wife's omputer  with ver 1.1.18
 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17
 
 None of the above can use SSL
 
 Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area .
 

No issues with standard ATT DSL here; still 995 w/pop.att.yahoo.com and
465 w/smtp.att.yahoo.com many email accounts via ATT.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Website problems

2009-11-20 Thread Cedar
When I go to this website with SM 2:  www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the 
following error message:


XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/
Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification 
content=OaEYk1WjScjIOpwuOyxCWyPJhJk0F9byX3q7s6cgtOQ /link 
href=/App_Themes/Theme/CSSHandler.axd?page=JGiJdDpvd5mqQf4kon3jcktmlugEgTLeXrO97BQ6_M0zuv2f1x9gDI74u0-Lq79G0amp;t=-enbEn1smA5dIAmLvd63r98KRSZX9FhMgM3HF72lIjk1amp;p=11Ir3EFxTdMkv009Q5tOcQ2 
type=text/css rel=stylesheet /meta name=description content=Up 
To The Minute Beef Cattle News amp; Information Ranging From Ranch To 
Retail  //head

^

Any ideas what this might be about?  If someone else would be so kind as 
to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. 
Thanks.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey