Re: Ignore please.
On 6/29/2014 7:24 PM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: I could test the success of the cancel myself with 'Repair Folder' under Properties. Not necessary now. ;) but it's still there Then it seems, that a successful cancel is not possible here *g* And many usenet servers like GigaNews. :( -- Although you're a little ant, I won't bully you. --Sai Yuk from The Legend of Fong Sai Yuk movie (English subtitles) /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ignore please.
Ant: On 6/29/2014 7:24 PM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: Then it seems, that a successful cancel is not possible here *g* And many usenet servers like GigaNews. :( In the case of news.mozilla.org the behavior is not unreasonable. There is a gateway between the news server and the mailing lists, and to cancel a mail is impossible. *g* Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
Richard Owlett:
In browser:
I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup.
In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an
empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the
address bar is for address/search terms.
The same is true for my 2.30a1.
I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the
desirable default?
It hasn't bothered me enough to look for a workaround. Maybe others know.
In mail/news:
Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type
than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any
work-around?
That i have not noticed. I modify the display of the sig since many
years. This is done so:
- userContent.css -
.moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature { background-color: #f0f0f0; }
---
You could set your own preferred values. :)
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 30/06/14 22:26, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Richard Owlett:
Snip
In mail/news:
Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type
than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any
work-around?
That i have not noticed. I modify the display of the sig since many
years. This is done so:
- userContent.css -
.moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature { background-color: #f0f0f0; }
---
You could set your own preferred values. :)
Hartmut
Hartmut, your pref is changing the background colour (or color, :-) ).
How does that effect the colour of the type??
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26 Build identifier: 20140415200419
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.26 Build identifier: 20140408191805
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
Daniel:
On 30/06/14 22:26, Hartmut Figge wrote:
- userContent.css -
.moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature { background-color: #f0f0f0; }
---
You could set your own preferred values. :)
Hartmut, your pref is changing the background colour (or color, :-) ).
How does that effect the colour of the type??
You can set other values as well, font-family, -size, -color, other
things...
.moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature {
name-1: value;
name-2: value;
[...]
name-n: value;
}
Maybe you have to add !important. Exercise gains knowledge. :-P
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 06/30/2014 09:50 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
On 30/06/14 22:26, Hartmut Figge wrote:
- userContent.css -
.moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature { background-color: #f0f0f0; }
---
You could set your own preferred values. :)
Hartmut, your pref is changing the background colour (or color, :-) ).
How does that effect the colour of the type??
You can set other values as well, font-family, -size, -color, other
things...
.moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature {
name-1: value;
name-2: value;
[...]
name-n: value;
}
Maybe you have to add !important. Exercise gains knowledge. :-P
Hartmut
As long as I see it as lighter text when I'm viewing an email or post,
whatever is done doesn't matter.
I want to know it is a signature and not content.
--
Sponsored by Thunderbird 24.6.0 or 31.0b1
EQT Three Rivers Regatta - July 2-4, 2014
http://www.threeriversregatta.net/
GO Bucs! GO USA!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. The signature block has always been lighter than the message body when viewing posted messages. Setting mail.identity.default.suppress_signature_separator to true in about:config should change that behaviour. Don't be upset whe people start replying to your signature because they think it is content. -- This is a plain text signature, not content. It is not lighter text when I am composing. It is lighter text when reading a posted message. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: transfer bookmarks
Juiceman pounded out : Rufus wrote: Juiceman wrote: I would like to copy my bookmarks on my laptop computer to my other computer. What files do I need to copy for my other computer to display the bookmarks? There are a couple of ways to do this - 1) you can copy the places.sqlite file from the Profile on one machine to the other. 2) you can use Bookmarks Manager to Export your Bookmarks as .html, move that file from one machine to the other, and then use Bookmarks Manager to Import Bookmarks from that file. I also use Export and then edit with Composer to send lists of Bookmark URLs as a .html file to friends via e-mail...very handy. Also handy if you don't want to move *all* of your Bookmarks from one machine to another. Where do I find places.sqlite on a win7 computer. I typed places.sqlite in the the search box on the start menu but it didn't find it.? That method of searching is to find a Windows system program. You would have found the file if you used Windows Explorer search on (most likely) the C: drive. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ Too many freaks, not enough circuses. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
WaltS48: As long as I see it as lighter text when I'm viewing an email or post, whatever is done doesn't matter. Depends. The reason why i changed the background color was to be able to see trailing blank lines. There was a time when blank lines were appended after a sig. This bug has been fixed. Then there was a time, when the appended blank lines were shown in the Sent folder but not in the message itself. Seems also to be fixed. Why do i still modify the background color of sigs? It does not disturb me, it may be convenient in the future and i can spare the effort of commenting out the modification. ;) P.S. Oh, i have just tested a mail to myself with a manually inserted sig. Two blank lines are appended. But only in the received mail, not in the Sent folder. Interesting. :) Therefore i have send a message to a test group of a news server. No appended blank lines in either the message or the Sent folder. Am i interested enough to look further? No. :-D Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
WaltS48: On 06/30/2014 10:32 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Why do i still modify the background color of sigs? It does not disturb me, it may be convenient in the future and i can spare the effort of commenting out the modification. ;) But does it disturb your recipients? How? Modifications to the userContent.css only affect the display on my own machine. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 06/30/2014 10:32 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS48: As long as I see it as lighter text when I'm viewing an email or post, whatever is done doesn't matter. Depends. The reason why i changed the background color was to be able to see trailing blank lines. There was a time when blank lines were appended after a sig. This bug has been fixed. Then there was a time, when the appended blank lines were shown in the Sent folder but not in the message itself. Seems also to be fixed. Why do i still modify the background color of sigs? It does not disturb me, it may be convenient in the future and i can spare the effort of commenting out the modification. ;) snip Hartmut But does it disturb your recipients? -- Sponsored by Thunderbird 24.6.0 or 31.0b1 EQT Three Rivers Regatta - July 2-4, 2014 http://www.threeriversregatta.net/ GO Bucs! GO USA! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ignore please.
On 6/30/2014 4:58 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: Then it seems, that a successful cancel is not possible here *g* And many usenet servers like GigaNews. :( In the case of news.mozilla.org the behavior is not unreasonable. There is a gateway between the news server and the mailing lists, and to cancel a mail is impossible. *g* Ah. So it never worked as intended in the past world-wide? :( -- Don't be no Ant-Man. An Ant-Man has very low horizons. --Forrest Gump /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 06/30/2014 10:39 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS48: On 06/30/2014 10:32 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Why do i still modify the background color of sigs? It does not disturb me, it may be convenient in the future and i can spare the effort of commenting out the modification. ;) But does it disturb your recipients? How? Modifications to the userContent.css only affect the display on my own machine. Hartmut My mistake. The OP wants to read messages received without the signature being in lighter text. That is what I thought your instructions were explaining how to do. -- Sponsored by Thunderbird 24.6.0 or 31.0b1 EQT Three Rivers Regatta - July 2-4, 2014 http://www.threeriversregatta.net/ GO Bucs! GO USA! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ignore please.
Ant: On 6/30/2014 4:58 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: In the case of news.mozilla.org the behavior is not unreasonable. There is a gateway between the news server and the mailing lists, and to cancel a mail is impossible. *g* Ah. So it never worked as intended in the past world-wide? :( Cancels in general on other news servers? Even if a cancel is accepted and propagated to other news servers, you can never be sure, that others can not see the cancelled message. The user may have a local news server which may have received the message before it was cancelled. Then there are news server which require Cancel-Lock Cancel-Key for an allowed cancel. You may use a news server which does not require them, so you do not need them for a cancel on that news server. But other news server, requiring them, will not accept the cancel. So you may end up with a successful cancel on your own news server while the posting can still be read via other news server. :) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fixed -- Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Bug 3223393: [Platform_Windows]Windows-7: Firefox Window loses focus every time Flash plugin processes are (re-)launched
Ant wrote: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3223393 Hi, this issue is fixed in internal build, you can get next beta build from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flashplayer/ to verify your issue. Thanks! --Jing Yuan on 3:13:50 AM GMT+00:00 Jun 17, 2014 Finally fixed?! Flash 14.0.0.125 exhibits all the previous problems with SM that have been discussed in this group. The message I am getting is: Warning Unresponsive Plug In Shockwave Flash may be busy or it may have stopped responding I am running two machines, one with Win 7 64b, the other vista 32b both with SM 2.26.1. Flash still will not run on my Vista machine and focus is lost. The problems also occurs on the Win 7 machine. I keep Flash disabled most of the time. Recent prior versions of SM did not lose focus on either machine. Anyone else still having these or similar problems? Larry ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
WaltS48: The OP wants to read messages received without the signature being in lighter text. That is what I thought your instructions were explaining how to do. That was my intention. That he is able to change the display of sigs on his own machine. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 6/30/2014 5:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? I fail to see any harm in the default Enter search term, keyword, or web address. This appears whenever the address area is blank even if the page itself is not blank. In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? The signature block is gray instead of black to alert you to the fact that the signature (and anything below it) will be removed automatically when replying to the message. The indicator for this is the dash-dash-space (-- ) on a line by itself at the beginning of the signature block. Not many versions ago, the capability was added to mail-news -- both Thunderbird and SeaMonkey -- to suppress the dash-dash-space for E-mail. As indicated in another reply in this thread, that capability depends on the preference variable mail.identity.default.suppress_signature_separator. If that is set true, your signature block will not be gray and will not be removed when you reply to an E-mail message. Section 4.3 of RFC 3676, however, requires that the dash-dash-space indicator be present at the start of the signature block for newsgroup messages. P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam, flames, and trolling from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[no subject]
Title: New Page 1 Fuck off Sent from my Cricket mobile device Fuck off ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[no subject]
Title: New Page 1 U have been reported to FCC Sent from my Cricket mobile device U have been reported to FCC ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[no subject]
Title: New Page 1 REMOVE , STOP Sent from my Cricket mobile device REMOVE , STOP ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[no subject]
Title: New Page 1 U HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO FCC , TAKE ME THE FUCK OFF OR I WILL FILE CHARGES Sent from my Cricket mobile device U HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO FCC , TAKE ME THE FUCK OFF OR I WILL FILE CHARGES ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fixed -- Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Bug 3223393: [Platform_Windows]Windows-7: Firefox Window loses focus every time Flash plugin processes are (re-)launched
Larry wrote: Ant wrote: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3223393 Hi, this issue is fixed in internal build, you can get next beta build from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flashplayer/ to verify your issue. Thanks! --Jing Yuan on 3:13:50 AM GMT+00:00 Jun 17, 2014 Finally fixed?! Flash 14.0.0.125 exhibits all the previous problems with SM that have been discussed in this group. The message I am getting is: Warning Unresponsive Plug In Shockwave Flash may be busy or it may have stopped responding I am running two machines, one with Win 7 64b, the other vista 32b both with SM 2.26.1. Flash still will not run on my Vista machine and focus is lost. The problems also occurs on the Win 7 machine. I keep Flash disabled most of the time. Recent prior versions of SM did not lose focus on either machine. Anyone else still having these or similar problems? Larry Not having any problems with Flash here on CNN or Fox News tests. But I'm using Linux with Flash 11.2.202.378 Any links to the problem sites might help. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
WaltS48 wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. The signature block has always been lighter than the message body when viewing posted messages. Evidently not for Windows XP users. I notice your User Agent says Linux. Setting mail.identity.default.suppress_signature_separator to true in about:config should change that behaviour. Don't be upset whe people start replying to your signature because they think it is content. I want to change what I see, not what gets sent. I don't use a signature block in any case. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/30/2014 5:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? I fail to see any harm in the default Enter search term, keyword, or web address. This appears whenever the address area is blank even if the page itself is not blank. I didn't say there was harm. It's a personal preference issue. I want it blank until I personally put something there. In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? The signature block is gray instead of black to alert you to the fact that the signature (and anything below it) will be removed automatically when replying to the message. The indicator for this is the dash-dash-space (-- ) on a line by itself at the beginning of the signature block. The dash-dash-space was always enough of an indication for me. I find the shift in opacity distracting. (You should see what my chosen defaults do to color schemes used by some page designers who can't imagine anybody with imperfect vision using their site [end rant;]) Not many versions ago, the capability was added to mail-news -- both Thunderbird and SeaMonkey -- to suppress the dash-dash-space for E-mail. As indicated in another reply in this thread, that capability depends on the preference variable mail.identity.default.suppress_signature_separator. If that is set true, your signature block will not be gray and will not be removed when you reply to an E-mail message. Section 4.3 of RFC 3676, however, requires that the dash-dash-space indicator be present at the start of the signature block for newsgroup messages. P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fixed -- Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Bug 3223393: [Platform_Windows]Windows-7: Firefox Window loses focus every time Flash plugin processes are (re-)launched
WaltS48 wrote: Larry wrote: Ant wrote: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3223393 Hi, this issue is fixed in internal build, you can get next beta build from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flashplayer/ to verify your issue. Thanks! --Jing Yuan on 3:13:50 AM GMT+00:00 Jun 17, 2014 Finally fixed?! Flash 14.0.0.125 exhibits all the previous problems with SM that have been discussed in this group. The message I am getting is: Warning Unresponsive Plug In Shockwave Flash may be busy or it may have stopped responding I am running two machines, one with Win 7 64b, the other vista 32b both with SM 2.26.1. Flash still will not run on my Vista machine and focus is lost. The problems also occurs on the Win 7 machine. I keep Flash disabled most of the time. Recent prior versions of SM did not lose focus on either machine. Anyone else still having these or similar problems? Larry Not having any problems with Flash here on CNN or Fox News tests. But I'm using Linux with Flash 11.2.202.378 Any links to the problem sites might help. Hard to pinpoint a site when I have multiple tabs and windows open. It seems to occur at start up with AOL.com as my home page. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
Interviewed by CNN on 30/06/2014 13:38, Richard Owlett told the world: WaltS48 wrote: The signature block has always been lighter than the message body when viewing posted messages. Evidently not for Windows XP users. I notice your User Agent says Linux. Uh, no, I used XP for years and it was lighter there too. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Xerox Star. * Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. Does that happen with themes other than the default classic one? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?
Hartmut Figge wrote: EE wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I am using Firefox compatibility. That audio did not play for me automatically. Interesting. You are using 2.26.1 and i have used 2.30a1. Also, we are using a different OS. Now i am also using 2.26.1. I can do that because i did download the release before some hours to test another issue. *g* On a fresh profile the audio started automatically. That was expected because the Firefox compatibility is default. But. Almost always there is a but. :) Using 2.26.1 with my default profile, the one i use with 2.30a1, audio did *not* start automatically. Whatever the Firefox compatibility was set to. Hm. You could also test the issue with a fresh profile. Just to enhance the confusion. :-D Hartmut I much prefer to have to click a play button to get an audio item to play rather than have it start by itself. I am going to leave things alone. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?
I much prefer to have to click a play button to get an audio item to play rather than have it start by itself. I am going to leave things alone. Ditto. :) -- /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Worker Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links (AQFL): http://aqfl.net \ _ /Please remove ANT if replying by e-mail. ( ) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 7/1/14 1:38 AM +0900, Richard Owlett wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. The signature block has always been lighter than the message body when viewing posted messages. Evidently not for Windows XP users. I notice your User Agent says Linux. It's always been lighter in plain text, but not the case for HTML. HTML signatures have recently been differentiated. trane -- / // Trane Francks tr...@tranefrancks.com Tokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to consider or re-configure to get this page to show and usable? It does work in Chrome, for sure... TIA - bo1953 Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? TIA - bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 30/06/2014 20:08, Richard Owlett wrote:
This comes under heading of unintended consequences.
I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1.
In browser:
I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup.
In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an
empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the
address bar is for address/search terms.
I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the
desirable default?
You're the second person to ask for this.
userChrome.css Example:
html|*.textbox-input::-moz-placeholder {
color: #FFF;
opacity: 0.0;
}
In your case you could set the opacity to 0. You may want to make this
specific to the address bar.
In mail/news:
Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type
than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any
work-around?
Currently we use opacity: 0.5 to simulate lighter type. Use
userChrome.css to set the opacity back to 1.0.
P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother
upgrades.
Thanks
Phil
--
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 7/1/14 5:48 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to consider or re-configure to get this page to show and usable? It does work in Chrome, for sure... TIA - bo1953 Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? TIA - bo1953 Is there a particular page that is causing trouble? I was able to browse the movies without issue. -- / // Trane Francks tr...@tranefrancks.com Tokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 6/30/2014 8:25 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/30/2014 5:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
This comes under heading of unintended consequences.
I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1.
In browser:
I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup.
In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an
empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the
address bar is for address/search terms.
I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the
desirable default?
I fail to see any harm in the default Enter search term, keyword, or
web address. This appears whenever the address area is blank even if
the page itself is not blank.
I do. In Windows:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Perhaps it is my profile setting, but if I enter a word ('burp' for
instance) in the URL bar, I am returned with and alert messge:
burp could not be found. Please check the name and try again
Ironically, if I do the same in Firefox 30.0
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/30.0
, I am redirected to www.inert.com:
You have been forwarded to www.inert.com.
If you came here from a domain other than inert.com, the domain you
entered is most likely for sale.
To make an offer, send us a letter via snail mail at the address below.
For faster service, visit http://www.emailaddressprotection.com and
enter the domain name that interests you and send us a message.
...
So either way, it can be quite misleading... and, in the case of Firefox
it can be a security issue.
...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? Have you tried Safe Mode? Smith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 30-Jun-14 18:18, NFN Smith wrote: SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? Have you tried Safe Mode? Smith Is that a system safe mode or is there a SM safe mode which I Am not familiar with? Thanks... bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 30-Jun-14 17:45, Trane Francks wrote: On 7/1/14 5:48 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to consider or re-configure to get this page to show and usable? It does work in Chrome, for sure... TIA - bo1953 Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? TIA - bo1953 Is there a particular page that is causing trouble? I was able to browse the movies without issue. I cannot see the landing page at all. It is blank. Any insight? TIA - bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 06/30/2014 06:51 PM, SamuelS wrote: On 30-Jun-14 18:18, NFN Smith wrote: SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? Have you tried Safe Mode? Smith Is that a system safe mode or is there a SM safe mode which I Am not familiar with? Thanks... bo1953 SM safe mode Menu Help Restart with Add-ons Disabled. -- Sponsored by Thunderbird 24.6.0 or 31.0b1 EQT Three Rivers Regatta - July 2-4, 2014 http://www.threeriversregatta.net/ GO Bucs! GO USA! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 6/30/2014 3:00 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Ironically, if I do the same in Firefox 30.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/30.0 , I am redirected to www.inert.com: You have been forwarded to www.inert.com. If you came here from a domain other than inert.com, the domain you entered is most likely for sale. To make an offer, send us a letter via snail mail at the address below. For faster service, visit http://www.emailaddressprotection.com and enter the domain name that interests you and send us a message. ... So either way, it can be quite misleading... and, in the case of Firefox it can be a security issue. ... Sorry, forgot to add that I *do* realise that the Firefox redirect is not standard and that I can reset it easily. I normally use linux, but I've been using Windows the past few days to troubleshoot some LibreOffice issues and have been using both FF and SM in the process. My point was/is that entering arbitrary 'searches' in the URL address bar is, IMO a security issue overall. That's probably why I've managed to disable it in SeaMonkey... now I just have to remember how (the CRS is getting worse lately). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
NoOp: My point was/is that entering arbitrary 'searches' in the URL address bar is, IMO a security issue overall. That's probably why I've managed to disable it in SeaMonkey... now I just have to remember how (the CRS is getting worse lately). No search is performed on my SM. I do not like that. If i enter a false term in the location bar, i want to get an error message. And i do. :) Probably because of Edit-Preferences-Browser-Location Bar [ ] Perform a web search when entered text is not a web location which is not checked. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 30-Jun-14 19:07, WaltS48 wrote: On 06/30/2014 06:51 PM, SamuelS wrote: On 30-Jun-14 18:18, NFN Smith wrote: SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? Have you tried Safe Mode? Smith Is that a system safe mode or is there a SM safe mode which I Am not familiar with? Thanks... bo1953 SM safe mode Menu Help Restart with Add-ons Disabled. Walt, Thank you, that worked, which means it is an add-on which is preventing the display. Maybe it is AdBlock do you think? bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
On 6/30/2014 4:24 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: My point was/is that entering arbitrary 'searches' in the URL address bar is, IMO a security issue overall. That's probably why I've managed to disable it in SeaMonkey... now I just have to remember how (the CRS is getting worse lately). No search is performed on my SM. I do not like that. If i enter a false term in the location bar, i want to get an error message. And i do. :) Probably because of Edit-Preferences-Browser-Location Bar [ ] Perform a web search when entered text is not a web location which is not checked. Hartmut Thanks! That was it. I think I changed previously in about:config. keyword.enabled;false ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
On 7/1/14 7:50 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 30-Jun-14 17:45, Trane Francks wrote: On 7/1/14 5:48 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to consider or re-configure to get this page to show and usable? It does work in Chrome, for sure... TIA - bo1953 Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? TIA - bo1953 Is there a particular page that is causing trouble? I was able to browse the movies without issue. I cannot see the landing page at all. It is blank. Any insight? TIA - bo1953 When a page fails to correctly display/load, my first inclination is to clear the cache and then immediately restart SeaMonkey. That usually clears up the problem. -- / // Trane Francks tr...@tranefrancks.com Tokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Play Store...
SamuelS wrote: Thank you, that worked, which means it is an add-on which is preventing the display. Maybe it is AdBlock do you think? Extensions are the most likely, although there can be other odd settings in the profile that can be disruptive (for which Safe Mode can also clear). AdBlock is definitely a potential culprit, as are other blocking tools, such as FlashBlock, NoScript and Ghostery. I've also seen occasional display problems by blocking cookies for particular sites. I run AdBlock and NoScript, and am not having any problems at Google Play, although a check of Adblock settings there (Shift-Ctrl-V) shows that I don't have anything blocked there. Might want to make sure that there aren't any settings blocking content. Smith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
EE wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. I understand the logic behind the chain. Can I have back the desirable default? In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? P.S. I go back to Netscape days and this was one of the smoother upgrades. Does that happen with themes other than the default classic one? I don't know. I *INTENTIONALLY* stay as close as possible to default Netscape (4.x???) as possible. I have never added any extensions/addons/whatever. I predate era of KSR35's and acoustic couplers (new chip introduced recently - 8085) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1
Richard Owlett: EE wrote: Does that happen with themes other than the default classic one? I don't know. [...] Richard, there is now enough information in the thread for a solution of the issue with 'light text'. Enough information that you can help yourself if you care. That seems not to be the case because you are ignoring my replies and the valuable information in the one of Philip. Despite that i have tested a working resolution. Which you are obviously not interested in. *eg* Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
