PrefBar User Agent switching to FF
I know I did this before, but can't figure out now, how it was done! Sorry for asking again. Anyway, I can't figure out how to get into that part of PrefBar where you can add in new user agents, such as FF, or whatever you want. Help...? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PrefBar User Agent switching to FF
David E. Ross wrote: On 3/28/10 11:59 PM, Cedar wrote: I know I did this before, but can't figure out now, how it was done! Sorry for asking again. Anyway, I can't figure out how to get into that part of PrefBar where you can add in new user agents, such as FF, or whatever you want. Help...? This is different in PrefBar 5.x than it was in PrefBar 4.x. 1. On the PrefBar toolbar, right-click. Select Customize Prefbar. 2. On the of the Preferences window, scroll either Available Items or Enabled Items (depending on whether you have enabled the User Agent menulist) until you see User Agent. 3. Right-click on User Agent. Select Edit. 4. If you want to add a new user agent to the list, left-click on the + button at the lower-left of the Edit Item window; insert a short label under Label and the full user agent string under Value. If you want to update an existing entry in the list, just change it under Value (and even under Label if appropriate). 5. Select the OK button on the Edit Item window and the OK button on the Preferences Toolbar pane. That's it! Wow! (wooden-head moment here!) Thanks much! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Moving address books to new installation
I recently got a new computer, but was unaware I should have backed up my address books to the ldif format, all I have is the .mab files. Is there any way to import/move them from the .mab backups into the new computer? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Updating SM
Does SM usually ask before it applies an update? For example, the update to version 2.0.3. The reason I'm asking is because when I started it up today, it refused to load until I let it install this updatewhich was obviously already on my computer and I have no idea how or when it even got there! Is there something in preferences that needs to be changed to adjust this weird behaviour? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Time-Out Settings?
chicagofan wrote: chicagofan wrote: Cedar wrote: I'm just taking a wild guess here! Is there such a thing as a time-out setting for SM (or FF, for that matter), that would tell the browser to keep looking for a website for a longer time before telling me to try again, etc., etc.? Is that what a time-out even is? If there is such a changeable setting, where could it be found? In SM under Edit/Preferences/Network Storage/Mail Connections you can change your Connection Timeout: [ ] seconds. Let us know if it works for you, some people doubt it is working. :) I changed mine, and it seemed to work for me, but I was reducing the default time. bj Oops... I just realized that setting is apparently just for mail connections. Sorry about that. :( bj Uh, ya, I was actually looking for such a setting for the browser. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Windows Live and SM
Does SM Mail work on Windows Live? My ISP is switching over to Windows Live and from what they are telling me, it can only be accessed through a browser, and, with no way to download the e-mails to why computer!!Please.tell me it's not true! ??? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Time-Out Settings?
chicagofan wrote: Cedar wrote: chicagofan wrote: chicagofan wrote: Cedar wrote: I'm just taking a wild guess here! Is there such a thing as a time-out setting for SM (or FF, for that matter), that would tell the browser to keep looking for a website for a longer time before telling me to try again, etc., etc.? Is that what a time-out even is? If there is such a changeable setting, where could it be found? In SM under Edit/Preferences/Network Storage/Mail Connections you can change your Connection Timeout: [ ] seconds. Oops... I just realized that setting is apparently just for mail connections. Sorry about that. :( Uh, ya, I was actually looking for such a setting for the browser. I thought it was for both initially, because of the Network mention. Apparently the network settings for your operating system and ISP connection are your only hope. Sorry I haven't seen anything in SM specifically for the browser. bj Thanks for the info. Now, where could I find these network settings for xp, and for my isp connection? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Time-Out Settings?
I'm just taking a wild guess here! Is there such a thing as a time-out setting for SM (or FF, for that matter), that would tell the browser to keep looking for a website for a longer time before telling me to try again, etc., etc.? Is that what a time-out even is? If there is such a changeable setting, where could it be found? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cookies
Leonidas Jones wrote: Cedar wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Cedar wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Cedar schrieb: /snip/ Have you tested it by allowing cookies and seeing if the slowdown goes away? Lee Yes, now I have, and no, it makes no difference. I've tried lots of different things like using the default profile, safe mode, making a new profile, played around with various cookie settings, nothing seems to help. Well, I suppose you could try reverting to SM 1.1.18, and see if it clears up. Do you have Firefox installed, does it behave better? Lee Actually, ya, I'm using FF now, and it's much better, although it does suffer from some of the same symptoms. If I went back to SM 1.1.18, would my mail folder survive intact? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cookies
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Cedar wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Have you tested it by allowing cookies and seeing if the slowdown goes away? Lee Yes, now I have, and no, it makes no difference. I've tried lots of different things like using the default profile, safe mode, making a new profile, played around with various cookie settings, nothing seems to help. In that case, why are you fixating on cookies as opposed to all the other possibilities? It comes across as a witch hunt, not a search for truth. Uh, sorry, didn't realize I was fixating...and ya, I guess it is a witch hunt since I have not the knowledge of these things to do a proper, sequentially structured search. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cookies
chicagofan wrote: Cedar wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Cedar wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Cedar schrieb: On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme slowdowns and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies? Nope. Really!? What then? This is in the extreme...I have had to give up on my favorite browser! What could possibly be doing this? Have you tested it by allowing cookies and seeing if the slowdown goes away? Yes, now I have, and no, it makes no difference. I've tried lots of different things like using the default profile, safe mode, making a new profile, played around with various cookie settings, nothing seems to help. Any chance this is just seasonal traffic increase due to Christmas shoppers online? I remember when I was on dial up with ATT, December was always a miserable month for me. However, that was a long time ago, so things may have improved since then. bj Well, in general, I doubt if things have improved for us poor ol' dialupers, and of course, will not improve any further as its basically a dead technology. But, no, it can't be the Christmas thingit's just way too extreme for that, and I've never noticed that before on ours, actually. Since FF seems to be working quite well, and the, ugh...other browser just flies through it all, it's obviously something with sm, unfortunately. Oh well, I guess we can survive with FF until/if SM's next version improves things. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cookies
Martin Freitag wrote: Martin Freitag schrieb: Cedar schrieb: Actually, ya, I'm using FF now, and it's much better, although it does suffer from some of the same symptoms. If I went back to SM 1.1.18, would my mail folder survive intact? SM2.0 has migrated your mails to a new profile, your old mails remain untouched in your SM1.1.x profile. PS: have you tried to reproduce hat behaviour in a new (secondary) profile in SM2? Martin Yes, and if I remember right, initially it did seem to make some difference, but now it does not! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Dialup speed] was (Re: Cookies)
NoOp wrote: On 12/14/2009 12:08 AM, Cedar wrote: chicagofan wrote: ... Any chance this is just seasonal traffic increase due to Christmas shoppers online? I remember when I was on dial up with ATT, December was always a miserable month for me. However, that was a long time ago, so things may have improved since then. bj Well, in general, I doubt if things have improved for us poor ol' dialupers, and of course, will not improve any further as its basically a dead technology. But, no, it can't be the Christmas thingit's just way too extreme for that, and I've never noticed that before on ours, actually. Since FF seems to be working quite well, and the, ugh...other browser just flies through it all, it's obviously something with sm, unfortunately. Oh well, I guess we can survive with FF until/if SM's next version improves things. No idea if this will help on dialup, but you might try going into about:config and setting: network.dns.disableIPv6;true Try experimenting with pipelining (Keep-Alive) and Link Prefetching turned on/off. Note: you can compare these settings in Fx in about:config as well. network.http.pipelining;true network.http.keep-alive;false Perhaps someone w/dialup can offer more suggestions. Thanks for the suggestions, but these are all set identically in both FF and SM, so probably not a clue? What is IPv6? I have never had pipelining on, the warnings kinda veered me away from that, what does that do? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cookies
Leonidas Jones wrote: Cedar wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Cedar schrieb: On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme slowdowns and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies? Nope. regards Martin Really!? What then? This is in the extreme...I have had to give up on my favorite browser! What could possibly be doing this? Have you tested it by allowing cookies and seeing if the slowdown goes away? Lee Yes, now I have, and no, it makes no difference. I've tried lots of different things like using the default profile, safe mode, making a new profile, played around with various cookie settings, nothing seems to help. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Cookies
On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme slowdowns and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Cache Path
What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one? Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each profile? I see all my caches for various profiles have been in a different place than the rest of the profile. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache Path
Bernard Mercier wrote: Cedar a couché sur son écran : What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one? Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each profile? I see all my caches for various profiles have been in a different place than the rest of the profile. See edit|preferences|advanced|cache. Ummmaybe I should give more details: My profile's cache is in: C:\Documents and Settings\my comp\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\my profile My SM profile is in: C:\Documents and Settings\my comp\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\my profile Is this normal for the cache to be in this directory, or should it be in the SM profile's directory? Or does it even matter? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache Path
NoOp wrote: On 12/07/2009 01:02 PM, Cedar wrote: Bernard Mercier wrote: Cedar a couché sur son écran : What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one? Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each profile? I see all my caches for various profiles have been in a different place than the rest of the profile. See edit|preferences|advanced|cache. Ummmaybe I should give more details: My profile's cache is in: C:\Documents and Settings\my comp\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\my profile My SM profile is in: C:\Documents and Settings\my comp\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\my profile Is this normal for the cache to be in this directory, or should it be in the SM profile's directory? Or does it even matter? Each profile keeps it's own cache directory. You can also see where your cache is by using 'about:cache' in the url address bar. Oh Boy! U...maybe it's me missing something here, but.I know where my profile is keeping it's cache, but since it's in a different directory than my SM profile, I'm wondering if it's in the correct place or notFrom my previous post above, please note difference in the two paths: one has a folder called local settings, the other does not! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Mail import to SM 2
Is there a normal way to get the mail folder from SM 1.1.18 to SM 2? I also have one subfolder from 1.1.18 that will not show up in the new mail folder. Any ideas why this may be happening? Is there a way to just open the old mail folders to read them? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM and FF slow!
Cedar wrote: My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE, however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening? Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat, but still pretty slow. Also, in safe mode, I noticed that when I clicked stop on one site that had been loading and tried to go to another site, SM kept on trying to load the images from the first site! I had to hit stop and enter the next url several times before it went to the next site. I installed prefbar a couple of days agonaw...it couldn't be causing these problems, could it? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM and FF slow!
Cedar wrote: Cedar wrote: My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE, however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening? Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat, but still pretty slow. Also, in safe mode, I noticed that when I clicked stop on one site that had been loading and tried to go to another site, SM kept on trying to load the images from the first site! I had to hit stop and enter the next url several times before it went to the next site. I installed prefbar a couple of days agonaw...it couldn't be causing these problems, could it? As well, the net connection keeps stalling (this does not seem to happen in ie), and the Networking tab in Windows Task Manager shows a very low percentage of Network Utilization. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM and FF slow!
My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE, however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Would somebody mind telling me what this browser sniffing thing is all about? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Wow! You guys are fantastic! That actually workedI can even click on the e-mail newsletter links and get there now! Holy Cow! (haha) But now, should I leave this new string in about:config permanently? Are there any possible circumstance/websites where this change may cause problems? Thanks much. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroup 2 copies
Bush wrote: Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you Hmmm...darn! Oh welltoday all the headers disappeared from the newsgroup, had to download them all againgrrr!!...and now all seems fine, at least for now. I wonder if this is going to happen to my mail folders too!!??? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
Hartmut Figge wrote: Cedar: [www.cattlenetwork.com] Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Well, using http://validator.w3.org/: Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Result: 762 Errors, 239 warning(s) ;) Hartmut Wow! Thanks much everybody! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Website problems
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta. Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/ Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification content=OaEYk1WjScjIOpwuOyxCWyPJhJk0F9byX3q7s6cgtOQ /link href=/App_Themes/Theme/CSSHandler.axd?page=JGiJdDpvd5mqQf4kon3jcktmlugEgTLeXrO97BQ6_M0zuv2f1x9gDI74u0-Lq79G0amp;t=-enbEn1smA5dIAmLvd63r98KRSZX9FhMgM3HF72lIjk1amp;p=11Ir3EFxTdMkv009Q5tOcQ2 type=text/css rel=stylesheet /meta name=description content=Up To The Minute Beef Cattle News amp; Information Ranging From Ranch To Retail //head ^ Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: https site problems persist
chicagofan wrote: Cedar wrote: From my previous post Sep. 11, 09: On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16, MTS (Propel) Accelerator. I can't remember just when all these problems started, but has been happening for several months now, not sure if it started with SM 1.1.16 or not. How long have you been using ZA Suite AND AVG together? I've never known anyone to use more than one AV security program without problems. Have you considered dropping AVG to see what happens? Or install another firewall to work with AVG and disable ZA Suite? I don't know what version of ZA Suite you are using, but if you google about your problems, you will see others are having connection problems with a recent version of ZA. Anyway, when trying to access certain secure sites, I am very often getting the following message: Address Not Found (website address) could not be found. Please check the name and try again. The browser could not find the host server for the provided address. * Did you make a mistake when typing the domain? (e.g. ww.mozilla.org instead of www.mozilla.org) * Are you certain this domain address exists? Its registration may have expired. * Are you unable to browse other sites? Check your network connection and DNS server settings. * Is your computer or network protected by a firewall or proxy? Incorrect settings can interfere with Web browsing. Below this message is a try again box, which sometimes works when I click on it. Unfortunately, that message doesn't help, because it's pretty generic and covers a multitude of connection problems. I have upgraded to SM 2 and this problem has followed me!! This also happened in SM 1.1.18. Actually, to be more accurate, it 's not just on accessing these sites, it happens at any point during my visitI get kicked out and have to go back in all the time. Since it is still happening in vs 2, does that help with figuring out the problem at all? Try reducing your anti-virus programs, and see if we can get more specific error messages. :) bj I've been using ZA and AVG together for about 7 months, come to think of it, that could actually be around the time these problems started! Right after a virus problem and a hard drive format! Grrr! Hmmm... Do they tend to clash even with ZA's antivirus disabled and just the free avg antivirus installed? Dropping AVG seems like it could be risky as I am unable to update ZA on my machine...always get an error message when I try, that's been a problem for a long time. Any suggestions as to another firewall to try with AVG? I did previously have AVG's entire suite trial installed, but the firewall seemed..well...kinda weird and not very ...umm...thorough, or something, I guess. So..would it work ok to run AVG's antivirus and some other firewall, or would there be possible clashes there too? My version of ZA is 8.0.298.035. I tried googling for these problems and could find no info about any version this recent! And basically not a lot of info at all. Do you have some idea which version may be causing problems? Do I need to reduce my internet security programs in order to reduce my anti-virus programs? ..Or is it a matter of just not having the antivirus parts of these programs enabled in more than one suite? Is there any other way to possibly track down the specific error message? For what it's worth, Firefox is even worse, at least today, I could not even get into my bank website with it! ...and it seems to be stalling when it tries to connect to search.avg.com. Could something along these lines possibly be affecting SM too? ...like when it kicks out of the banking site...maybe it's actually looking for search.avg.com, but not telling me that? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
https site problems persist
From my previous post Sep. 11, 09: On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16, MTS (Propel) Accelerator. I can't remember just when all these problems started, but has been happening for several months now, not sure if it started with SM 1.1.16 or not. Anyway, when trying to access certain secure sites, I am very often getting the following message: Address Not Found (website address) could not be found. Please check the name and try again. The browser could not find the host server for the provided address. * Did you make a mistake when typing the domain? (e.g. ww.mozilla.org instead of www.mozilla.org) * Are you certain this domain address exists? Its registration may have expired. * Are you unable to browse other sites? Check your network connection and DNS server settings. * Is your computer or network protected by a firewall or proxy? Incorrect settings can interfere with Web browsing. Below this message is a try again box, which sometimes works when I click on it. I have upgraded to SM 2 and this problem has followed me!! This also happened in SM 1.1.18. Actually, to be more accurate, it 's not just on accessing these sites, it happens at any point during my visitI get kicked out and have to go back in all the time. Since it is still happening in vs 2, does that help with figuring out the problem at all? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: https site problems persist
And it still happens in a different profile, and the cookies were set to Allow all cookies and Accept cookies normally. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with https sites
Robert Kaiser wrote: Cedar Lane wrote: On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16 https connections can be intercepted in all SeaMonkey versions before 1.1.18, please upgrade if you want to make sure that secure sites are secure. Robert Kaiser I did the upgrade, but the problem persists! Any other ideas? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with https sites
Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.09.2009 01:32, Cedar Lane wrote: --- Original Message --- On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16, MTS (Propel) Accelerator. I can't remember just when all these problems started, but has been happening for several months now, not sure if it started with SM 1.1.16 or not. Anyway, when trying to access certain secure sites, I am very often getting the following message: Address Not Found (website address) could not be found. Please check the name and try again. The browser could not find the host server for the provided address. * Did you make a mistake when typing the domain? (e.g. ww.mozilla.org instead of www.mozilla.org) * Are you certain this domain address exists? Its registration may have expired. * Are you unable to browse other sites? Check your network connection and DNS server settings. * Is your computer or network protected by a firewall or proxy? Incorrect settings can interfere with Web browsing. Below this message is a try again box, which sometimes works when I click on it. I am also finding browsing to be very slow in general as well, with rather large pauses in activity noted quite often, even on http sites. Could this have anything to do with SM, or some setting within it? Any ideas? Can you post the URL to the site so the rest of us can see for ourselves? No, not really, but it is happening with most, if not all, https sites. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with https sites
Robert Kaiser wrote: Cedar Lane wrote: On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16 https connections can be intercepted in all SeaMonkey versions before 1.1.18, please upgrade if you want to make sure that secure sites are secure. Robert Kaiser OMG!!! Is there any way to tell if that is what's happening here or not? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: LogIn Problems
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Cedar wrote: Win XP and SM 1.1.16. I've been having a lot of problems logging in to various sites, one being my bank site, another is ebay!, etc...almost any site that requires a login gives me problems, usually involving booting me back to the login screen over and over and over again. Any ideas? Something with cookies? Most likely. Have you changed your cookie preferences? For example, if your policy now rejects cookies that you previously accepted, you'll be shut out. Or if you started enforcing a policy that was previously theoretical. Edit | Preferences | Cookie Acceptance Policy: Allow cookies based on privacy settings (View Privacy Settings) Actually, I have never changed any settings in the privacy settings as I just can't seem to wrap my head around how all that works, even. I usually just have my Cookie Acceptance Policy on Block Cookies and then use the Tools menu cookie manager on a site by site basis to allow cookies from the sites that I want to allow. Maybe this is where I'm messing up somehow.? Maybe that doesn't work for some reason? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: LogIn Problems
Cedar wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Cedar wrote: Win XP and SM 1.1.16. I've been having a lot of problems logging in to various sites, one being my bank site, another is ebay!, etc...almost any site that requires a login gives me problems, usually involving booting me back to the login screen over and over and over again. Any ideas? Something with cookies? Most likely. Have you changed your cookie preferences? For example, if your policy now rejects cookies that you previously accepted, you'll be shut out. Or if you started enforcing a policy that was previously theoretical. Edit | Preferences | Cookie Acceptance Policy: Allow cookies based on privacy settings (View Privacy Settings) Actually, I have never changed any settings in the privacy settings as I just can't seem to wrap my head around how all that works, even. I usually just have my Cookie Acceptance Policy on Block Cookies and then use the Tools menu cookie manager on a site by site basis to allow cookies from the sites that I want to allow. Maybe this is where I'm messing up somehow.? Maybe that doesn't work for some reason? Hmmm...this seems weird. I set the Cookie Acceptance Policy to Allow Cookies for the Originating Website Only and the Cookie Retention Policy to Accept Cookies Normally and now am able to get into my ebay account! Also I see the Tools menu Cookie Manager automatically reset to Use Default Cookie Permissions. Is this normal behaviour? Am I misunderstanding how the Tools menu cookie manager settings are supposed to work? What is going on?!?? It would sure be nice if the Tools menu cookie manager would work the way it appears to be meant to work, it's such a pain to have to dig into that preferences panel every time I want to log in to a site! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Spam in e-mails...?
Daniel wrote: Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? Cedar, when you say Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], what do you mean?? The others have told you that your ISP may be marking your mail with SpamAssassin and such, but are you meaning that when you look at an email, you get a line in the display saying something like SeaMonkey thinks this is a Spam message? (or is that Scam or Junk?). If it's Junk, you can train SM so that it recognises Junk and automatically removes the message to your Junk file, or deletes it. If it says Scam, I don't know that you can train SM to do anything, except to let you know which messages it thinks are sus... Daniel Wow! Thanks for all the responses, guys! Daniel: What I mean is pretty much exactly what I stated earlier, the subject lines are being altered with this exact term [SPAM] inserted at the beginning of each of the ones it thinks are spam. I think I might have it figured out now, as I found a place in avg to configure choices that sound exactly like this...so, hopefully, that does the trick! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
E-mail folder lost
My (newly acquired) antivirus found a virus in one of my folders where I keep the stuff that I want to keep. It then deleted the entire folder! Ouch! The filename in the virus vault is named 0021_body.html: what does this 0021 mean? Is that a number that defines which e-mail was infected? Is there a way to view this e-mail, or preferably this entire folder, would that filename mean that it's the 21st e-mail in the folder...? Would there maybe be a way to delete just the offending e-mail and restore the others, at least? Is this normal behaviour for an antivirus, I mean to delete the entire folder? If that's the case, Wow! what if it had been found in my main folder! Ouch! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Spam in e-mails...?
Leonidas Jones wrote: Daniel wrote: Cedar wrote: Daniel wrote: Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? Cedar, when you say Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], what do you mean?? The others have told you that your ISP may be marking your mail with SpamAssassin and such, but are you meaning that when you look at an email, you get a line in the display saying something like SeaMonkey thinks this is a Spam message? (or is that Scam or Junk?). If it's Junk, you can train SM so that it recognises Junk and automatically removes the message to your Junk file, or deletes it. If it says Scam, I don't know that you can train SM to do anything, except to let you know which messages it thinks are sus... Daniel Wow! Thanks for all the responses, guys! Daniel: What I mean is pretty much exactly what I stated earlier, the subject lines are being altered with this exact term [SPAM] inserted at the beginning of each of the ones it thinks are spam. I think I might have it figured out now, as I found a place in avg to configure choices that sound exactly like this...so, hopefully, that does the trick! Here's hoping!! Daniel Yes indeed, and please let us know the result! Lee Yep! Looks like that was it, sorry for bugging you guys on this one needlessly (but my hair was gettin' thinner by the minute...don't even know why that spam thing bugs me so much!) Anyway, I've received a few e-mails that were previously marked with this spam marking, that today do not have spam added in to the subject line. So...thanks anyway, guys. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Spam in e-mails...?
Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Address Book?
Martin Feitag wrote: Cedar schrieb: I recently had to format my hard drive and am now re-installing everything. Is there a way to get my old additional address book back? I copied the Personal Address Book into the new profile and it is working fine, but the other one does not show up now. Did you export that additional addressbook via Tools = Export ? Then you can import it via Tools = Import for example. Otherwise I guess you need to create a new Adressbook (File = New = ...) an copy your backup over the newly created (and therefor empty) files of the addressbook like it is done with mail-accounts. Where does SM keep the collected addresses address book? Are they in a .mab file? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
