seamonkey mail says unable to authenicate to SMTP server..
No security is selected but any attempt to send mail produces this message.Unable to authenticate to SMTP server It goes on to say, The server does not support any secure compatible secure authentication mechanism... No encryption is selected in Mail security.. No security is selected in Server settings. Selecting security from top mail menu Digitally signed No, Encrypted No. I did a cold boot problem continues. The old copy of 1.17 on the same machine works correctly in mail as does a copy on another machine on the same network. any suggestions welcome. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: seamonkey mail says unable to authenicate to SMTP server..
I should have mentioned I'm running 2.0.4 SM, and that under Default encryption while grayed out Never is selected. On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:47:03 -0500, me2 p...@thirdstaratright.net wrote: No security is selected but any attempt to send mail produces this message.Unable to authenticate to SMTP server It goes on to say, The server does not support any secure compatible secure authentication mechanism... No encryption is selected in Mail security.. No security is selected in Server settings. Selecting security from top mail menu Digitally signed No, Encrypted No. I did a cold boot problem continues. The old copy of 1.17 on the same machine works correctly in mail as does a copy on another machine on the same network. any suggestions welcome. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore Form manger...(no content)
I'm the dummy who started this topic, and I apologize to those who found my message format, content, etc., incorrect. I let my frustration with the loss of a, to me, highly valued part of seamonkey - form manager color my remarks. Since then I've messed with the various suggestions for forms made here - and I really appreciate those that have labored to try and find a way - I've used Netscape and then SeaMonkey since I was gifted AOL many years ago and realized there had to be something better.. Unfortunately not only did I lose form manger but found that 2.02 and 2.03 had odd problems as well with my main Internet machine (its runs Vista win64 which may contribute).. I've decided to move on for now, Opera runs really nice, my bookmarks survived the move as did my mail - its form management is nothing to write home about but as someone here explained to me if I want better I should write it (like that would ever happen). I hope seamonkey gets its act together, that a form manger returns, that the we're in this together attitude reappears.. and shot world peace as well. I'll check back in a few months or so I guess, but if not I'll well aware of the value of one less user.. To those that made seamonkey 1.xx so great my thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore Form manger...(no content)
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: The powers that be don't have the manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any free software, will defined by a few - the genius of its origin was a browser that encompassed several vital tools under one umbrella. To start cutting off any of these, form manger included, diminishes the original concept and automatically removes some users who had depended on a given ability. If the powers that be really want to send people to other browsers this is great way to start. BUT I really believe that the importance of form manger was just underestimated and there remains hope for its restoration. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore Form manger...(no content)
I'm going to make the unlikely assumption that your posting was of good intent - that you surely recognized that the initial post was a plea to the seamonkey community to restore what I believe is an important part of the original Netscape heritage. That my followup plainly said I belied that the lack of form manger in 2.x was a reflection of the lack of understanding as how important it was to many users- not an intentional slight. I don't believe anything I posted was shooting blanks, unless someone's touchy-feeling mode is on way high. I know this is Usenet where the small can be heard with as much volume as the small minded, I plea guilty to being the first and try not to practice the latter.If you don't value form manger, well that's your view, I was merely trying to keep the issue visible here, hoping that those who are considering abandoning SM well at least know that are others who still have hope. On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:44:45 -0800, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote: On 01/05/2010 11:27 AM, me2 wrote: On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: The powers that be don't have the manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any free software, will defined by a few - the genius of its origin was a browser that encompassed several vital tools under one umbrella. To start cutting off any of these, form manger included, diminishes the original concept and automatically removes some users who had depended on a given ability. If the powers that be really want to send people to other browsers this is great way to start. BUT I really believe that the importance of form manger was just underestimated and there remains hope for its restoration. And I (we?) do hope that you'll take advantage of SeaMonkey to review the past threads addressing this issue, rather than starting a new one shooting blanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Restore Form manger...(no content)
___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Using firefox add-ons...
Since the code is getting to be very similar, are we going to be able to get firefox add-ons, e.g., autofill forms? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no contnet)
___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.1 personal toolbar )bookmarks)
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:39:25 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: me2 wrote: How do I NOT show the bookmarks folder in my toolbar? I mean the one SM adds that is named Bookmarks, this isn't needed any way since Bookmarks appears in the top drop downs, and it takes up room that I need for other folders- I don't believe 2.0 did this? any word/hope on form manger? Click and hold on a Blank area in the menubar From Pop up menu choose Customize Next click on Bookmarks Item in menu bar and drag to the open menu and drop. do not drag just off of the menu or else it will disappear forever.be sure to drag to the open customize menu and drop. Also another Dumb idea putting the home button at the same level as the bookmark item and the book marks bar I dragged it up to the navigation bar where is should have been. some of these developers . makes you wonder. appreciate the help! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no content)
I am using it, but find the present system odd in that I can't understand what it will remember and what it won't. On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:07:39 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: me2 wrote: From the sounds of things . No. download the Form History manager add on. It's a decent substitute. Its not perfect but it will work okay. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.0.1 personal toolbar )bookmarks)
How do I NOT show the bookmarks folder in my toolbar? I mean the one SM adds that is named Bookmarks, this isn't needed any way since Bookmarks appears in the top drop downs, and it takes up room that I need for other folders- I don't believe 2.0 did this ? any word/hope on form manger? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
What can we expect in restoring form manger?
I'm not wise to the ways of SM's programmers- is there hope ? if so what/when can we expect any change? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does Form Manager in 2.0 Work?
restore form manger On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:58:48 -0800 (PST), Arsbajt Tosov arsb...@gmail.com wrote: How does one correct mistakes. In the other you could go in and correct. Now there appears no way to correct things. Not only that, but the new form manager saves information that I DON'T WANT it to save, like CREDIT CARD NUMBERS. There is no way now to remove that information without deleting ALL stored form information. Way to go, Mozilla! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.0 ?
My sole complaint about SM 2. is the removal of form manger - my objections come from two directions: 1) the feature was used by many of us for many years and was somewhat unique among browsers, and 2) the removal of a feature is not an improvement, and adding insult to injury, some here seem ready to dismiss those of us who used that function- telling us to make do with a firefox handme down. Firefox is nice - I have a copy on one my machines, but if SM's claim to fame is to be reduced to saying were firefox and thunderbird in one package, what's the point? The number of complaints here and other places about the removal of form manger is just the tip of the iceberg- most don't complaint, they vote with their feet and go looking for a replacement. I've said before, but it bears repeating I am very aware of the debt I owe the unsung heroes who have kept SM going, my rumbling here in no way reduces that, but at the same time I feel it appropriate to remind those here that SM IN ITS ORIGINAL concept was part of the true linage of Netscape and that is its true claim to fame. Restore form manager ... isOn Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:35:27 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 2/12/2009 23:36, John Boyle told the world: Phillip Jones wrote: question wrote: Is 2.0 a beta ? At this point official no. To the newsgroup: But from a USERS standpoint, a definite YES! :-( Speaking as someone who had *no* problems at all, whose migration went flawlessly (despite having a somewhat complex mail setup) and who now enjoys a lot of stuff that simply wasn't available for the old version, I have to disagree. No software *ever* hits the public in a perfect form. Bugs *will* be found. But calling it a beta because of it... well, by that logic, *all* software is beta. when we see so much complains it would be better to maintain the beta status some time longer ... I strongly disagree. They went through, I think 3 RC's. Versions were tested in house, then went to public alphas, betas, and RCs. The testing showed some major issues, which were corrected. most of the problems we are seeing here are minor, the exceptions being the migration issues, and the form manager. Any product that goes through a really major revision, and, under the hood, this might as well be a new product, is going to have issues like this. You think you are seeing complaints now? Wait til Thunderbird 3 reaches release. They are testing like crazy and fixing things,and delaying. I predict there will still be storm when it hits release. Wait til the software is perfect, and you might as well never release anything. Lee Actually 2 RC a notice was put up after the second one about it being wrong wait for the third which followed a day later. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Release of SM 2.x- please restore form manager don't break anything else PLEASE
I did say please... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
..new. .Form Manager seem to be hard for people to grasp.. No! its just it is not as usable as the previous, most of us have seen it in firefox. Many of us used SM 1.x because of the presence of form manger. The new one doesn't handle whole forms, requires an extension to get minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used existing part of SM. sigh.. bring back form manger. On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski b...@spikowski.com wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote: Restore the old Form Manager! ...please... We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday. https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final Look under the feedback section. That's great news -- I'll bet there's an awful lot of who haven't switched to 2.0 simply because of the loss of the truly excellent form manager in the 1.n series. When colleagues ask me why I rely on software as little known as Seamonkey, I give several compelling reasons -- the form manager has always been #1 (and the support from this newsgroup is #2 -- thanks to you all!). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Restore the old Form Manager!
...please... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Form Management
I appreciate your response Phil, I guess my surprise is that a feature that's been with us this long should be declared out - I assume long thought was given to doing that, deciding that 2.o's other improvements outweighed waiting until form manger could be rewritten/fixed. It never occurred to me that a version of my favorite browser would suddenly omit a feature, going back instead of forward. I know that SM like all mozillas relies on volunteers, and bless them all for work that we all appreciate so much, and yes there is a but coming- I used all of SM- browser, mail,composer and sometimes chat. I doubt anyone here really knows the customer base for the various components, or how many now seeing form manger gone will just vote with feet and use some other browser. But thanks for the thought - I'll watch to see if someone kind soul rides to the rescue- and never again will I update a browser without reading ALL the update notices . On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:57:38 +0800, Philip Chee philip.c...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:05:54 -0600, me2 wrote: This thread seems to be winding down but I wanted to make one last plea for the restoration of form manager, if SM's only claim to fame is to slowly being reduced to were firefox and thunderbird combined, what's the point? Those of us who have been Netscape users forever use these little unimportant parts. I hope someone can rectify this situation, but if not let me express my appreciation for all who over the years gave me a browser I loved... I'm sure I will miss it. Nobody in mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey is against a restored Form Manager. But just as I stepped forward and volunteered to implement customizable toolbars (I'm a ERP/Business ReEngineering consultant), or Misak stepped forward and volunteered to implement session restore (at that time he was just a tech working on Cisco routers, or KaiRo stepping forward to reimplement the XPFE style download manager window (despite at that time being solely a web designer and didn't have much experience actually working on SeaMonkey code). So we need someone to step forward and volunteer to reimplement a Forms History Manager. Phil ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Form Management
This thread seems to be winding down but I wanted to make one last plea for the restoration of form manager, if SM's only claim to fame is to slowly being reduced to were firefox and thunderbird combined, what's the point? Those of us who have been Netscape users forever use these little unimportant parts. I hope someone can rectify this situation, but if not let me express my appreciation for all who over the years gave me a browser I loved... I'm sure I will miss it. On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:42:55 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: me2 wrote: BTW, who decided the old form manger wasn't needed/used/wanted? The Firefox developers. To be fair, they made that decision for Firefox only. When SeaMonkey made the switch to the common back-end (Toolkit) this is what we got. The old form manager would have had to be reimplemented in the new environment but obviously that didn't happen. Even if someone stepped up to do the work now I don't know whether the old form manager behavior would be accepted for inclusion in newer SeaMonkey versions. Unless someone tries I guess it won't ever happen. But of course there's always the possibility that someone develops an extension that implements something similar. Greetings, Jens Odds are the developer in charge of it at FireFox said to him self , people don't use this anyway do we even need it. You could acquire the code for the Forms history extension and included it already built in as you do ChatZilla, JavaScript Debugger, and DOM inspector. If you don't want to be bothered with actually developing one. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What happened to the form manager
another man's useless bloat. You need a Form Manager, and this extension gives you an excellent one wow! - I'm tempting to comment that something else is bloated here BUT in all fairness to L Jones, whatever the feature, if you don't/didn't use it your appreciation/value of it probably wasn't much. And no this new (its firefox's idea of a form manger) ISN'T an excellent one by comparison. Those who use parts that have been with all along foolishly expected the community to maintain them, not decide a function or whatever wasn't to continue. There parts of Netscape that I've never used, probably never will, but you'll find no complaint here over the last 12 years of bloat. Give us back forms manager - AND let the community have a say if someone decides to kick something else to the curb. On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:12:22 -0500, Leonidas Jones leonidasjo...@netscape.net wrote: another man's useless bloat. You need a Form Manager, and this extension gives you an excellent one ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Form Management
So for the newt form whateverthehellitiscalled hasn't reacted/show up when presented with a form in the browser- is there a spell to invoke? I've never tried to go backwards after a SM update- is there going to be a problem with going back to 1.1.8 from 2.0? Is there a version of mozilla that retains the form manger? This is really a disappointment, I've used Netscape/seamonkey forever but form manger is a required application here. On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:48:56 -0600, MikeyG contactbyp...@hatespam.net wrote: me2 wrote: I downloaded and installed the extension, its better than nothing, but I suspect I am not in a minority in missing the original from manger. having to add something like Roboform seems to defeat the original concept- Is there any hope at all of restoring form manager? I will uninstall 2.O and go back to 1.18 for now. me2 wrote: let us hope - I didn't use firefox for this very reason. On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:12:25 -0400, Louu...@domain.invalid wrote: Dennis Gleeson wrote: A new form manager replaces all previous web form management, and automatically keeps a record of what you type into forms and presents you these options in a drop-down list when you come back. I haven't downloaded the new version yet but have a question based on some previous reading on here. Is there any way in 2.0 to fill a complete form with 1 or 2 clicks(like with the current form manager) or are you forced to make a choice from drop downd in EACH form field? I miss the old form manager too. Maybe we'll get in in 2.1. Get the Forms History extension I have given up on SeaMonkey and begun to use FireFox and ThunderBird. I didn't want to stop using SeaMonkey, but the Form Manager was my main reason to keep using it; I really, can live with out Composer. Now, that SeaMonkey is so much near FireFox, and there is so much more awareness of FireFox and ThunderBird, I decided to go this way. Best wishes to all SEaMonkey users. MikeyG ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Form Management
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:49:14 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Download and install the Forms History Manager extension I did - when a form is in my browser nothing happens- enable form and search history is selected in history, a right click reveals form history and there are items listed BUT so far when I'm presented a form and/or start typing in a form, nothing happens. Am I doing it wrong? me2 wrote: So for the new form whateverthehellitiscalled hasn't reacted/show up when presented with a form in the browser- is there a spell to invoke? I've never tried to go backwards after a SM update- is there going to be a problem with going back to 1.1.8 from 2.0? Is there a version of mozilla that retains the form manger? This is really a disappointment, I've used Netscape/seamonkey forever but form manger is a required application here. clipped ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Form Management
I see that but I'm NOT seeing any form filling, i.e., no offers to fill any forms so far - is this function on automatically or do I need to do something to invoke it? BTW, who decided the old form manger wasn't needed/used/wanted? sigh... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:40:51 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: me2 wrote: On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:49:14 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Download and install the Forms History Manager extension I did - when a form is in my browser nothing happens- enable form and search history is selected in history, a right click reveals form history and there are items listed BUT so far when I'm presented a form and/or start typing in a form, nothing happens. Am I doing it wrong? me2 wrote: So for the new form whateverthehellitiscalled hasn't reacted/show up when presented with a form in the browser- is there a spell to invoke? I've never tried to go backwards after a SM update- is there going to be a problem with going back to 1.1.8 from 2.0? Is there a version of mozilla that retains the form manger? This is really a disappointment, I've used Netscape/seamonkey forever but form manger is a required application here. clipped when you open forms history Manager highlight the row in which the item you want to change then double click a window pops up with the info. you can edit from there. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Form Management
I downloaded and installed the extension, its better than nothing, but I suspect I am not in a minority in missing the original from manger. having to add something like Roboform seems to defeat the original concept- Is there any hope at all of restoring form manager? I will uninstall 2.O and go back to 1.18 for now. me2 wrote: let us hope - I didn't use firefox for this very reason. On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:12:25 -0400, Louu...@domain.invalid wrote: Dennis Gleeson wrote: A new form manager replaces all previous web form management, and automatically keeps a record of what you type into forms and presents you these options in a drop-down list when you come back. I haven't downloaded the new version yet but have a question based on some previous reading on here. Is there any way in 2.0 to fill a complete form with 1 or 2 clicks(like with the current form manager) or are you forced to make a choice from drop downd in EACH form field? I miss the old form manager too. Maybe we'll get in in 2.1. Get the Forms History extension ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sidebar: CNN expanded... sigh..
One of my reasons to stay with seamonkey has been the various sidebar items, and chief among them was CNN expanded- which no longer works. Getting someone to tell you about such is rough in the mozilla world- the very nature of the non centralized work often defeats an enduser like me trying to discover if something is no longer supported, just not working, or you're the only one having that problem. So last try- anyone able to tell me if sidebar and CNN are still supported? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
are there any news sidebars now that cnn doesn't work? (is sidebar going away?)
. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Fox forecast in seamonkey 1.1.16
I re-installed this add-on and got a message that no profile was available, Now I can't seem to access the program (I see nothing any where about it in my browser)- what am I missing? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fox forecast in seamonkey 1.1.16
Actually, I guessing its referring to the foxforecast profile - now oddly enough now and then ifox weather does show up, but not each time- restarting seamonkey or even cold/warm boot seemly making no difference. On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:05:47 +0200, Martin Feitag prof_nosp...@quantentunnel.de wrote: me2 schrieb: I re-installed this add-on and got a message that no profile was available, Now I can't seem to access the program (I see nothing any where about it in my browser)- what am I missing? Sry, but if it didn't find a profile to install to, you can't expect it to work afterwards. Martin ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: CNN out of date in sidebar- do I need xsidebar?
seamonkey 1.1.15 has a built-in sidebar, appearing when F9 is pressed. I have CNN extended as one of my sidebar items. Recently it stopped updating its content. I am trying to determine if CNN is no longer supports seamonkey's sidebar, or if something else is wrong. This is occurring on two different machines so it apparently not a local problem. My reference to xsidebar grew out of a reference I saw online- I had heard of it until now, and know about it. On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:19:05 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote: me2 wrote: I use seamonkey, currently using 1.1.15. I have CNN extended in my sidebar but it is out of date in its content. I tried reload frame but it is still out of date (lead story person found clinging to boat.. Is sidebar no longer supported for CNN?, or do I need to change to xsidebar to obtain CNN? I appreciate any help. is this an extension or addon you got from somewhere, or what? Is it a news feed? What sort of sidebar frame is this? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: CNN out of date in sidebar- do I need xsidebar?
Sorry, misunderstood. if sidebar is active , and you select tabs, customize sidebar, you go to a screen customize sidebar and if you select find more tabs you arrive at dmoz.org/Netscape/sidebar - One of the listed is CNN expanded which I've used since sidebar first appeared. On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:57:39 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote: me2 wrote: seamonkey 1.1.15 has a built-in sidebar, appearing when F9 is pressed. I have CNN extended as one of my sidebar items. Recently it stopped updating its content. I am trying to determine if CNN is no longer supports seamonkey's sidebar, or if something else is wrong. This is occurring on two different machines so it apparently not a local problem. My reference to xsidebar grew out of a reference I saw online- I had heard of it until now, and know about it. yes, I know what a sidebar is, but what I'm trying to find out is where are you getting this CNN in the sidebar from. Where's it coming from? An addon? What is the name of the top of the sidebar? This this a News Feed? What? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: CNN out of date in sidebar- do I need xsidebar?
Appreciate your help, I'll waste my time and try and contact CNN. ...sigh... On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:41:35 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote: me2 wrote: Sorry, misunderstood. if sidebar is active , and you select tabs, customize sidebar, you go to a screen customize sidebar and if you select find more tabs you arrive at dmoz.org/Netscape/sidebar - One of the listed is CNN expanded which I've used since sidebar first appeared. On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:57:39 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote: me2 wrote: seamonkey 1.1.15 has a built-in sidebar, appearing when F9 is pressed. I have CNN extended as one of my sidebar items. Recently it stopped updating its content. I am trying to determine if CNN is no longer supports seamonkey's sidebar, or if something else is wrong. This is occurring on two different machines so it apparently not a local problem. now we're somewhere and on the same wave length. Thank you. Hmmm, interesting. Its not updated in Firefox or Mozilla Suite either. So, I would guess its a problem at the cnn server. No, its not an xsidebar thing. It has nothing to do with that extension. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
