Re: [OSM-talk] OSM completeness
> completeness of the road datasets in OSM. if you are interested the Street(=road) name comparision - check this local projects: #OSM Housenumber Evaluation ( with street names ) : https://www.sotm-eu.org/slides/58.pdf ( video: https://www.sotm-eu.org/en/slots/50 ) http://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_auswahlort (Germany, Austria, Iceland, Romania, Luxemburg,.. ) #Hungary : Street name completeness statistics : http://82.196.14.91/ ( my development ) #Switzerland : http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_-_GWR_Street_and_Place_Names_Comparison #UK - Completeness analysis and ranking of UK councils by ITO World comparing OS Locator data. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_and_OSL_differences_analysis http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main Imre 2014-09-02 14:29 GMT+02:00 Eleanor Stokes : > Hi list, > Not sure if this is the right place to post--but I just got into using OSM > and > am hoping to utilize it for some of my research. I need to get some kind > of > completeness metric for each of the cities I am looking at (about 200 of > them). > > Does anyone happen to know of completeness analyses > across cities in different regions that have been performed? > I'm particularly interested in the completeness of the > road datasets in OSM. > > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Personal maps tool similar to my maps
Thanks! Will try all of these and see what works best! On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Alex Barth wrote: > Umap's great. There's also http://geojson.io/ > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > >> Try uMap: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Tanveer Singh >> wrote: >> >>> In google maps world you can create your own map, with waypoints, POIs >>> etc., of your choice and export it as KML etc., etc., >>> >>> IS there a similar website/tool/system available for OSM where I can >>> create a POI map online and then export >>> >>> --Tanveer >>> >>> ___ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] "Incorrect speed limit" anonymous notes - who is behind that?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Philip Barnes wrote: > I am aware that the USA has speed limits in multiples of 5 mph. I was > suggesting that the app should use the GPS, or settings, to get some > sensible locaiised values for speed limits values and mph/kph. > 3mph / 5km/h is also a common enough speed limit that this value appears in the SHS as a common value for speed limit signs (usually used in scales, unusually tight service plazas, etc). ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] "Incorrect speed limit" anonymous notes - who is behind that?
> Il giorno 03/set/2014, alle ore 21:21, Paul Johnson ha > scritto: > > 3mph / 5km/h is also a common enough speed limit that this value appears in > the SHS as a common value for speed limit signs (usually used in scales, > unusually tight service plazas, etc). I've also seen 5km/h limits in Italy, eg on private ground, at ferry terminals and at the customs cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] route=road - What's that all about then?
On Aug 21, 2014 5:11 PM, "SomeoneElse" wrote: > > On 21/08/2014 22:36, Janko Mihelić wrote: >> >> This makes sense because you can have more than one route on one way. > > > Some countries do this, but the UK (where the B3070 is) does not*, so there's really no need for it. to my mind don't exist) here. Except bike routes, bus routes, and pretty much every other kind of route relevant to road users that doesn't involve driving. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] route=road - What's that all about then?
For consistency sake, seems like relations are the way to go, even in one route instances. On Aug 22, 2014 10:08 AM, "Pieren" wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote: > > What did you mean with this? Do you suggest we use relations when there > are > > multiple refs, and ways when there is only one ref? > > Yes. It's just a pragmatic approach : I use relations only if I have > no easier alternative. Like a building : if it's a simple polygon, I > don't use relations. If it has a courtyard, I create a multipolygon > relation. In other words, it's not because some buildings need a > multipolygon relation that we should create a multipolygon relation > for each building. > > Pieren > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] route=road - What's that all about then?
On Aug 22, 2014 7:11 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > > > > Il giorno 22/ago/2014, alle ore 20:26, Jo ha scritto: > > > > Do I really hear you saying I should only map bus routes as relations where the ways are used by more than one route? and as route_ref tags on the stretches where that particular road is used only by a single bus line? > > > I also find this strange, a bus route is something very different from a street and should get its own osm object therefore. Otherwise you won't be able to tell which tags belongs to what, eg if the name (or ref or ...) is the name of the road or of the route. I just think the tools need to handle the loop scenario, where a bus route traverses the same way twice as part of a midroute dogleg or around the block situation. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] route=road - What's that all about then?
On Aug 23, 2014 8:54 AM, "John F. Eldredge" wrote: > > I have seen park roads that were accessible to the public only during specified daylight hours. Using them after park closing time would likely lead to trespassing charges. So, an opening_hours tag on those roadways would make sense. Or better clarity on access restrictions by time in general, given that roads or lanes may typically switch directions or be closed entirely at certain times of day, and it would be nice for routers to have something solid to hook on to for ideal routing advice. One problem that comes up a lot in Tulsa are turn restrictions that only apply during certain times of day unless you're driving vehicles operated by a specific agency... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of private roads
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:47 PM, john whelan wrote: > In the UK there are rights of way which date back in time to the days of > pack horses and long distance footpaths. I don't think you have the > equivalent in North America. Let me introduce you to the four westernmost timezones out of the five used in the 50 states... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
