Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:13:18 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Paul Johnson wrote:
 
 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:54 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29
 Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will
 say the formal out load.

 Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road.
 Why?  Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter
 I.

 You can do this in the renderer or text-to-speech system if you use the
 unabridged form.
 
 Hu?
 
 Can you please elaborate?

Rather than tagging for the renderer, change the renderer for the data, 
so when it sees, say, Interstate xxx, it abbreviates it to your liking.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:54 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29
 Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say
 the formal out load.
 
 Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road.
 Why?  Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter I.

You can do this in the renderer or text-to-speech system if you use the 
unabridged form.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Kevin Atkinson

On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Paul Johnson wrote:


On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:54 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:


Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29
Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say
the formal out load.

Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road.
Why?  Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter I.


You can do this in the renderer or text-to-speech system if you use the
unabridged form.


Hu?

Can you please elaborate?

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:56:51 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:

 Yes. Last time, a couple of us (or maybe just me - I forget) argued that
 it was OK to use common abbreviations for some well-known street types -
 at least St, Ave, Blvd, Pl, etc. - but the opposition was significant,
 and no change could be agreed upon. (OT - I wish that recognition of
 similar opposition in the tiger tag removal were given the same weight)

On the other hand, it's easier to handle non-abbreviated words in an 
automated fashion and the general global consensus has been for a long 
time now that abbreviations complicate things unnecessarily.  Meanwhile, 
it has been observed on more than one occasion that the quality of the 
data imported by TIGER is nearly or entirely worse than a blank map.

Or do people here really think everything should be expand to the
fullest.
 
 Trying to keep the discussion focused, I didn't write about all the
 places where abbreviations _are_ actually being widely used,
 theoretically against policy, like road networks, bike networks, pretty
 much any import with its own namespace, hgv, psv, source, etc.

Because in the cases key names, the meaning is unique and unambiguous, 
and in the case of network symbols, closely following national or 
international standards for those symbols.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:04:31 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 Since when does a frontage road get a Highway shield?

There's some special cases in Oregon where I 84 and US 30 are 
multiplexed.  US 30 takes the frontage in every city except Portland, 
Gresham, Wood Village and Troutdale.  Granted, this isn't normal, but 
it's an example of where it might happen.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:09:10 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:

 On 8/4/10 7:45 AM, Richard Weait wrote:

 North Service Road and South Service Road.  Romantic names, I know. Are
 these similar to what you are calling frontage roads?
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
lat=43.58872lon=-79.57644zoom=17layers=M

 i certainly would call those frontage roads.
 Perhaps frontage roads are an edge case that have been dealt with in
 another jurisdiction.  Are there suggestions from tagging, or talk?
 if the frontage roads have signs (some do, some don't) the name should
 be from the sign.
 
 otherwise, i'd go with local usage. some places use Service Road, others
 use Frontage Road, and i'm sure there are other usages.

If there is no name, don't tag it with a name= tag.  If it's known by the 
locals by a certain name, then loc_name= would be appropriate, even if no 
name= tag is used.



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:42:52 -0700, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:

 I think typically this isn't part of a name at all. Are people using it
 in an address for mailing? how is it written in official records? how
 would anyone do a search for a street? there are many corner cases so
 there is no simple yes or no

I might be special, but I do not use abbreviations at all when writing 
addresses.  Removes all ambiguity, especially given the number of times 
I've had my mail get returned as undeliverable because some dumbass 
addressed it to Portland, AR instead of Portland, OR.  If they hadn't 
used the abbreviation, that wouldn't have happened...


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Alan Mintz

At 2010-08-07 12:59, Paul Johnson wrote:

Meanwhile,
it has been observed on more than one occasion that the quality of the
data imported by TIGER is nearly or entirely worse than a blank map.


People can observe all they want - it doesn't make them right, and this 
particular observation would be absurd, not to mention offensive to those 
that worked on it!


I wouldn't have even considered working on the project without the presence 
of the TIGER (or some other centerline) import. It's almost always far more 
work creating roads than fixing them. I know this from experience drawing 
new developments, some rather large, as well as aligning and verifying 
against photos thousands of existing streets over thousands of square miles 
of urban, suburban, and rural southern CA.




Or do people here really think everything should be expand to the
fullest.

 Trying to keep the discussion focused, I didn't write about all the
 places where abbreviations _are_ actually being widely used,
 theoretically against policy, like road networks, bike networks, pretty
 much any import with its own namespace, hgv, psv, source, etc.

Because in the cases key names, the meaning is unique and unambiguous,
and in the case of network symbols, closely following national or
international standards for those symbols.


I'm talking about values, not just keys. I wrote in the original thread 
that making a small handful of common, unambiguous, abbreviations for 
street types acceptable would cover a large percentage of the cases. It is 
particularly useful and unambiguous if we separate them out into their own 
tag (which is why this came up again). Lastly, it matches the overwhelming 
majority of print usage and signage.


--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:37:33 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 Or do people here really think everything should be expand to the
 fullest.

Abbreviations are bad because they can't be easily automatically 
expanded.  However, it's easy to abbreviate in a renderer when you know 
what the full word is.  Classic example: Abbreviate the word Street.  
Ok, now expand the abbreviation St.

 Really, would anyone say: United States Highway 29.  Rather than U S
 Highway 29 or more likely just U S 29.

Everybody calls Martin Luther King, Junior Boulevard MLK or Milk 
Junior, but that doesn't stop the name from being the long-form.

 At least 1st hasn't been expand to First, etc.  But just wait...

Ordinal numbers are not abbreviations.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:28:26 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:

 Lastly, it matches the
 overwhelming majority of print usage and signage.

If print usage and signage were consistent even between cities in the 
same state, I'd tend to agree.  Given that what areas abbreviate which 
words and what abbreviation they use for it, I'd say trying to find 
abbreviations everyone can agree on for this is entirely futile to the 
point of not even being worth trying.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Kevin Atkinson

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:



On 3 Aug 2010, at 22:32 , Kevin Atkinson wrote:



OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types 
(Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will assume 
silence means agreement :)

Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29 Frontage Road or 
maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say the formal out load.



most of the times I see it
name=Frontage Road
ref=US 29

this will be rendered in similar way as on other maps. Name is on the 
street and US, I, is on a shield. Doesn't make sense to duplicate the 
ref on the name.


Since when does a frontage road get a Highway shield?

And in any case you are saying that the frontage road is part of US 29?



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.orgwrote:

 On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:


 On 3 Aug 2010, at 22:32 , Kevin Atkinson wrote:


 OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types
 (Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will assume
 silence means agreement :)

 Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29
 Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say the
 formal out load.


 most of the times I see it
 name=Frontage Road
 ref=US 29

 this will be rendered in similar way as on other maps. Name is on the
 street and US, I, is on a shield. Doesn't make sense to duplicate the ref on
 the name.


 Since when does a frontage road get a Highway shield?


got this wrong and meant Frontage road is a name, but now need to
correct altogether.
but what is meant here has most likely no name at all. frontage road is a
then a type of highway not a name. and US 29 in any form is not really a
name either.
again all other maps will not render names unless there really is a defined
name.
normally ramp, access road, frontage road are mapped as highway=*link
without name


 And in any case you are saying that the frontage road is part of US 29?



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.org wrote:

 OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types
 (Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will assume
 silence means agreement :)

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name
specifically under Abbreviations: Don't do it

:-)

 Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29 Frontage
 Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say the formal
 out load.

 Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road. Why?
  Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter I.

North Service Road and South Service Road.  Romantic names, I know.
Are these similar to what you are calling frontage roads?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.58872lon=-79.57644zoom=17layers=M

Perhaps frontage roads are an edge case that have been dealt with in
another jurisdiction.  Are there suggestions from tagging, or talk?

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Richard Welty

 On 8/4/10 7:45 AM, Richard Weait wrote:


North Service Road and South Service Road.  Romantic names, I know.
Are these similar to what you are calling frontage roads?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.58872lon=-79.57644zoom=17layers=M


i certainly would call those frontage roads.

Perhaps frontage roads are an edge case that have been dealt with in
another jurisdiction.  Are there suggestions from tagging, or talk?

if the frontage roads have signs (some do, some don't) the name
should be from the sign.

otherwise, i'd go with local usage. some places use Service Road,
others use Frontage Road, and i'm sure there are other usages.

richard


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 4 August 2010 08:23, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.org 
 wrote:
 On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
 On 3 Aug 2010, at 22:32 , Kevin Atkinson wrote:
 most of the times I see it
 name=Frontage Road
 ref=US 29

 this will be rendered in similar way as on other maps. Name is on the
 street and US, I, is on a shield. Doesn't make sense to duplicate the ref on
 the name.

 Since when does a frontage road get a Highway shield?


 got this wrong and meant Frontage road is a name, but now need to
 correct altogether.
 but what is meant here has most likely no name at all. frontage road is a
 then a type of highway not a name. and US 29 in any form is not really a
 name either.
 again all other maps will not render names unless there really is a defined
 name.
 normally ramp, access road, frontage road are mapped as highway=*link
 without name

Maybe the description= tag would be better for that, although name= is
traditionally abused so much for descriptions that I don't see it as a
problem.

I agree about U.S. not being read out fully, so possibly it's better
written this way too.

Cheers

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Mauer
On 08/04/2010 07:09 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
 otherwise, i'd go with local usage. some places use Service Road,
 others use Frontage Road, and i'm sure there are other usages.

Either way though, that’s not the actual name of the road.  It’s a
description  of the road’s function.  (though sometimes they are
actually named that by the local municipality as well, YMMV)

—Alex Mauer “hawke”



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Kevin Atkinson

On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Richard Weait wrote:


On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.org wrote:


OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types
(Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will assume
silence means agreement :)


See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name
specifically under Abbreviations: Don't do it

:-)


Yes of course I know about.  So you really are saying that, both examples
should be spelled out, _if_, they are called that.

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-04 Thread Lord-Castillo, Brett
I have found that in almost every case, the road really is officially named 
service road or frontage road if the naming authority is a county or 
municipality. In most cases though, the naming authority for such roads 
generally belongs to the State, who gives the road a name like an official name 
North Highway 40 Frontage Road (with the direction always designated side of 
the highway the road runs along, not direction the road runs), and then 
shortens it on the sign.
The exceptions are when the state has an even more cryptic system that gives 
the frontage road an official name like R40N270170. This is common when the 
frontage or service road is technically a ramp. In those cases though, the 
roads rarely have signage.
--Brett

Brett Lord-Castillo
Information Systems Designer/GIS Programmer
St. Louis County Police
Office of Emergency Management
14847 Ladue Bluffs Crossing Drive
Chesterfield, MO 63017
Office: 314-628-5400
Fax: 314-628-5508
Direct: 314-628-5407




-Original Message-
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:34:25 -0500
From: Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police
Message-ID: i3c1a8$rs...@dough.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

On 08/04/2010 07:09 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
 otherwise, i'd go with local usage. some places use Service Road,
 others use Frontage Road, and i'm sure there are other usages.

Either way though, that?s not the actual name of the road.  It?s a
description  of the road?s function.  (though sometimes they are
actually named that by the local municipality as well, YMMV)

?Alex Mauer ?hawke?

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Toby Murray
I'm not really speaking for/against abbreviations in general, just
adding information. It would definitely be Pkwy and Blvd. The USPS has
documented standards for prefixes, suffixes and any other fixes you
may want. 208 pages worth:
http://pe.usps.com/cpim/ftp/pubs/pub28/pub28.pdf

Toby


On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net 
 wrote:
 Yes. Last time, a couple of us (or maybe just me - I forget) argued that it
 was OK to use common abbreviations for some well-known street types - at
 least St, Ave, Blvd, Pl, etc. - but the opposition was significant, and no
 change could be agreed upon. (OT - I wish that recognition of similar
 opposition in the tiger tag removal were given the same weight)

 How do you abbreviate Boulevard? Blvd or Bv? How about Parkway? Pkwy,
 Pky, or Py? The same road (Central Florida Parkway) has all three on
 signs near its west end.

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
 How do you abbreviate Boulevard? Blvd or Bv? How about Parkway? Pkwy,
 Pky, or Py? The same road (Central Florida Parkway) has all three on
 signs near its west end.
 I'm not really speaking for/against abbreviations in general, just
 adding information. It would definitely be Pkwy and Blvd. The USPS has
 documented standards for prefixes, suffixes and any other fixes you
 may want. 208 pages worth:
 http://pe.usps.com/cpim/ftp/pubs/pub28/pub28.pdf

That pretty much negates the reasoning that we should use
abbreviations because it's what's on the signs though. I don't have
any strong feelings on one side or the other, except that I am opposed
to an 'in-between' state of abbreviating some (street, avenue) and not
others (parkway, circle) because signs are inconsistent about the
latter.

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Richard Weait
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
 How do you abbreviate Boulevard? Blvd or Bv? How about Parkway? Pkwy,
 Pky, or Py? The same road (Central Florida Parkway) has all three on
 signs near its west end.
 I'm not really speaking for/against abbreviations in general, just
 adding information. It would definitely be Pkwy and Blvd. The USPS has
 documented standards for prefixes, suffixes and any other fixes you
 may want. 208 pages worth:
 http://pe.usps.com/cpim/ftp/pubs/pub28/pub28.pdf

 That pretty much negates the reasoning that we should use
 abbreviations because it's what's on the signs though. I don't have
 any strong feelings on one side or the other, except that I am opposed
 to an 'in-between' state of abbreviating some (street, avenue) and not
 others (parkway, circle) because signs are inconsistent about the
 latter.

Inconsistent use on signs, one type of rendering, reinforces that we
should use the full name in the database.  Other types of rendering,
text to speech, Braille, map tiles, high resolution print, may rely on
the uniform and full name.  Or, at the discretion of that renderer may
choose to convert the long form to the short form of their choosing.

I see these abbreviation errors in other map products.  I have a
navigation device that announces County Road 33 as Co-Road
Thirty-three  Surely we can aspire to do better than propagating the
errors of other projects?

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
 I see these abbreviation errors in other map products.  I have a
 navigation device that announces County Road 33 as Co-Road
 Thirty-three  Surely we can aspire to do better than propagating the
 errors of other projects?

I've heard county aitch double-you why four twenty-three from in-car
navigation. I've also seen TIGER errors such as Cord (one word) for
County Road, or Logging Road for LR (a Legislative Route system that
existed in Pennsylvania until 1987). (The latter is of course an
improper expansion; we need to be careful when expanding.)

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Kevin Atkinson


OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types 
(Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will 
assume silence means agreement :)


Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29 
Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. 
Why.  Because no will say the formal out load.


Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road. 
Why?  Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter I.



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Apollinaris Schoell

On 3 Aug 2010, at 22:32 , Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 
 OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types 
 (Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will assume 
 silence means agreement :)
 
 Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29 Frontage 
 Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say the formal 
 out load.
 

most of the times I see it 
name=Frontage Road
ref=US 29

this will be rendered in similar way as on other maps. Name is on the street 
and US, I, is on a shield. Doesn't make sense to duplicate the ref on the name.

for the rest of the proposed changes in previos mails of the thread I'd say go 
ahead and do the changes. 

 Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road. Why?  
 Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter I.
 
 
 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-03 Thread Kevin Atkinson

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

OK.  So There is clearly no agreement on the abbreviation of road types 
(Street, Way, etc).  So what about these specific exceptions.  I will assume 
silence means agreement :)


So to be clear.  This mail has nothing to do with my proposed changes, or 
any of my other mail.  I am just trying to figure out where we stand on 
the abbreviation issue.


Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29 Frontage 
Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why.  Because no will say the formal 
out load.


Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road. Why? 
Even though some will say the formal, most just say the letter I.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-02 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.orgwrote:


 So I would like to know has anyone tried to get the wiki page changed so
 that it is not so rigid?


feel free to do so, if there is an acceptable agreement or the wiki just
doesn't make sense. the wiki is as open as osm. there is lot of wrong info
and missing docu about real mapping usage


 Or do people here really think everything should be expand to the fullest.

 Really, would anyone say: United States Highway 29.  Rather than U S
 Highway 29 or more likely just U S 29.


you know the answer. I think a lot of the expansion is wrong. we should map
what is on the ground and what can be verified. If people write address with
abbreviations and signs use abbreviations there is no reason to have
expanded names in osm


 In the above example would anyone write out the directional suffix.  In
 fact Alan didn't even know if that would be Northwest or NorthWest.


I think typically this isn't part of a name at all. Are people using it in
an address for mailing? how is it written in official records?
how would anyone do a search for a street? there are many corner cases so
there is no simple yes or no


 At least 1st hasn't been expand to First, etc.  But just wait...


 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us