Re: square brackets and rfc822
18 April 2002, 19:14, you wrote: After that, I took steps to ensure that those reading my messages could verify their legitimacy. I've just opened the certificate on your email and all it tells me is that it's valid. So what? If I'm suspicious about your post then I can get more information from the headers of your email than from any 'anonymous' certificate, as anyone who has kill-filed the participants in a newsgroup flame war can testify. My 2p worth is that these validated sigs and PGP garbage are just not relevant in a non-critical situation like this list (I'm not denigrating the value of the information here - just the importance being attached to the carrier of the message). -- Clive Taylor Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The BAT! and NAV
Hi all I want to use TB and Norton Antivirus, and i don't know how :-( can you help me ? thx in advance Liviu Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Big review of TB! in UK PC-PRO magaine...
Hello Mark, PC-PRO magazine, June 2002 Issue. Which is April 2002 where I live... ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Big review of TB! in UK PC-PRO magaine...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 19 April 2002 at 6:10 p.m. Mark wrote: MRH I've just finished flicking through a local copy of PC-PRO magazine (a MRH UK newstand IT magzine) and was pleasantly surprised to see TB! MRH reviewed in some depth and with favourable consequence. Interesting ... is there an on-line version of the magazine by any chance? Or a website? I would be interested in reading the article but I have never seen that magazine on sale here in NZ. Great to see some coverage of *real* email programs though! :-) Carren PGP public key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Key_Body=Please%20send%20key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.28 Comment: As long as one keeps searching the answers come iEYEARECAAYFAjy/1BwACgkQyogQhPvf03O+vQCgx+nwkLIwr0i0+ODenwwmji59 ELIAn3affVrWfOa/e8bTWUQDxDZNzVHf =CAdr -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 LF I want to use TB and Norton Antivirus, and i don't know how :-( LF can you help me ? I've been using NAV 2002 (and TB) for some months. There is no special considerations for TB. All emails are being checked (if you want to) going in and out, for any email client I have tried (TB, Pegasus, Outlook). There is no need to configure any kind of plugin for TB. - -- Best regards, Georg A. Krohg, MSc PGP Public key: http://www.krohg.no/pgpkrohg.txt Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i Comment: PGP Key: http://www.krohg.no/pgpkrohg.txt iQA/AwUBPL/HSxnwtHouoT59EQKPGwCeOa6dg7rTNyhuRra3qO+sCHRXWkoAnArp U3asxerunxM4xieMCcU+trL8 =lf8N -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PC Pro Approves!
Hello TBUDL For those in the UK, the June issue of PC Pro carries a great article by Davey Winder (their internet/email guru) extolling the virtues of TB! It's over two pages long - I can't remember a longer one devoted to one product. He was so impressed he bought a licence after using his review copy for a week. The magazine goes on sale next week and the article should be available on the PC Pro website www.pcpro.co.uk -- Regards William Flying with The Bat! 1.60 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: The BAT! and NAV
hmm. i used TB1.60c anv NAV2001 NAV doens't check my e-mails :( GAK -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GAK Hash: SHA1 LF I want to use TB and Norton Antivirus, and i don't know how :-( LF can you help me ? GAK I've been using NAV 2002 (and TB) for some months. There is no special GAK considerations for TB. All emails are being checked (if you want to) GAK going in and out, for any email client I have tried (TB, Pegasus, GAK Outlook). There is no need to configure any kind of plugin for TB. GAK - -- GAK Best regards, GAK Georg A. Krohg, MSc GAK PGP Public key: http://www.krohg.no/pgpkrohg.txt GAK Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[3]: The BAT! and NAV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 LF i used TB1.60c anv NAV2001 LF NAV doens't check my e-mails :( Never tried NAV 2001, and I used 2000 only with Outlook. Again without problems - with the anti-virus solution, that is...8-). At least in the 2002 version, NAV seems to have liberated itself from the email client, and just listens for email going in and out. Not much help I'm afraid. Maybe an upgrade will solve the problem? NAV 2002 worked just fine right out-of-the-box on my system. Easy configuration and setup, where the default is to check emails in both directions. - -- Best regards, Georg A. Krohg, MSc PGP Public key: http://www.krohg.no/pgpkrohg.txt Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i Comment: PGP Key: http://www.krohg.no/pgpkrohg.txt iQA/AwUBPL/S/xnwtHouoT59EQL29gCfdKPozhxyIn1jhy2CK1wp2RJ9zBAAoIr6 jP6NN3E+iFpnheL7t4PvWvx2 =g6HR -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Big review of TB! in UK PC-PRO magaine...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @19 April 2002, 07:10:11 +0100 Mark R Harding wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since Marck Pearlstone is mentioned in the article I'm assuming he and possibly some others would already know about this but in case anyone else doesn't, it makes a change to see an in-depth coverage of an email client other than Outlook. I did know and was contacted several times by Davey Winder, the author, who is now a very happy TB user. He loves it! - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8v+NbOeQkq5KdzaARAsx9AJ9y9SRNZRxaRrx3wNhMED23RBCWSwCg6wdu 7N2MPU4P7kDB70UQE1Nqcng= =WhYd -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
On 19 April 2002, 09:56, Liviu FEODOROV (RAL Computers) wrote: i used TB1.60c anv NAV2001 NAV doens't check my e-mails :( --- I'm also using TB1.60c and NAV2001 and NAV checks my emails. Have you configured NAV to show an animated icon in the System Tray? If not, you won't see any evidence of checking. I've posted some information on how to configure TB and NAV that you can use to check your config. The URL is http://www.gjctech.co.uk/misc/batnav.html HTH, -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Winamp currently playing Melanie C - If that were me This is a great place for a picnic ... 4,000 ants can't all be wrong Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
On 19 April 2002, 09:18, Liviu FEODOROV (RAL Computers) wrote: I want to use TB and Norton Antivirus, and i don't know how :-( can you help me ? --- Which version of NAV? If it's NAV 2000 or 2001, my page at http://www.gjctech.co.uk/misc/batnav.html may help. However, if it's NAV 2002, you should be aware that Symantec removed the necessary mechanism (the virtual POP3 server) with that version, preferring to support only standard (e.g. Outlook Express) MUAs. This means that you must use on-access scanning. Unfortunately, that will stop TB in its tracks whenever NAV detects a virus in the temporary file that TB creates when downloading mail. To get around this, you'll need to use the Dispatcher to delete the infected message from the server. If you manually download your mail, this shouldn't cause too much trouble. However, it does mean that you cannot rely on unattended mail download if you use NAV 2002. HTH, -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Winamp currently playing Shania Twain - That Don't Impress Me Much Press any button to continue, any other button to quit Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PC Pro Approves!
Hi William, Friday, April 19, 2002, 9:44:31 AM, you wrote: WM For those in the UK, the June issue of PC Pro carries a WM great article by Davey Winder (their internet/email guru) Yes, Winder is good and well respected so there should be a knock on in TB! sales. Be particularly interested to know what he felt about the interface and usability. WM The magazine goes on sale next week and the article on WM should be available on the PC Pro website www.pcpro.co.uk I had a good scout 'round the site but couldn't find it. I guess they'll wait to put current stuff on the site 'til retail copies have moved from the shelves. Anyone know different let me know and save me a trip to the shops tomorrow! With best wishes, Dave -- David Conroy MSW Personal and Management Coaching World-wide International Coach Federation, ID 1006660 http://www.e-coaching-only.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.coaching-lab.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.womens-life-coach.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Messaging on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_im Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Geoff, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 10:08:34 [GMT +0100], you wrote: GL However, if it's NAV 2002, you should be aware that Symantec removed GL the necessary mechanism (the virtual POP3 server) with that version, GL preferring to support only standard (e.g. Outlook Express) MUAs. This is not true. Symantec incorporated a kind of transparent checking in NAV 2002. They intercept communication with ports 25 (SMTP) and 110 (POP3) if the user configured the scanning of emails. There is no need to change anything else in your MUA. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60d on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
Hello Marck, 2 quibles - Lack of customizable toolbars, but he believes that will be addressed for v2 was one. Yes, it is quite unbelievable that such a good product as TB doesn't have customizable toolbar(s) yet. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
On 19 April 2002, 10:51, Lars Geiger wrote: This is not true. Symantec incorporated a kind of transparent checking in NAV 2002. They intercept communication with ports 25 (SMTP) and 110 (POP3) if the user configured the scanning of emails. There is no need to change anything else in your MUA. --- I can only go by what Symantec UK told me. At the time I asked them, I was seeking to purchase additional copies of NAV and asked their technical pre-sales for advice in choosing between NAV Corporate Edition and NAV 2002. My situation is that I have a separate mail server running on a computer that provides mail, DNS, and other services. That computer runs completely unattended -- sometimes its console goes unviewed for days. That server appears as a generic POP3/SMTP client to the outside world and so is akin to TB wrt AV protection. Obviously, I can't risk that service stopping dead in its tracks because of an incoming infected message. They (Symantec) told me that NAV 2002 scans access to the hard drives and both mail ports. However, they also told me that it would stop TB dead in its tracks because you could not configure NAV to automatically quarantine or delete without human intervention just infected mail. In telling me this, they turned down sales, so I believed them and went to a lot of trouble to obtain old stock of NAV 2001. -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 UK and USA - two countries divided by a common language Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[3]: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Michael, Friday, April 19, 2002, 2:50:19 AM, you wrote: Michael T. Ashby What about with Trend Micro's PC-Cillin or OfficeScan? Does anyone Michael T. Ashby know if there's anything special needed so that all of TB's mail is Michael T. Ashby scanned? Michael T. Ashby Also, what's the story on the plug-ins? I am new to the list, and new to TB! I use the AVG anti-virus available at www.grisoft.com its very good and free. I did download and install the AVG plugin from The Bat web site. I have already had AVG catch and quarantine one virus that was sent to me in the few days that I have been using TB. I previously used McAffee but when the subscription ran out In opted for AVG, also I have tried Norton 2002 but I had problems with it on WINXP and some other programs I was running like PGP. Sorry cant specifically answer your question but offer the above alternative. -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
Hello Dave Thank you for your email dated Friday, April 19, 2002, 10:33:58 AM, in which you wrote: DC Be particularly interested to know what he felt DC about the interface and usability. To be honest (and biased) he's over the moon about everything except the mail ticker and the default font -- Regards William Flying with The Bat! 1.60 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: PC Pro Approves!
Hello William, Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:09:33 AM, you wrote: DC Be particularly interested to know what he felt DC about the interface and usability. William Moore To be honest (and biased) he's over the moon about everything except the William Moore mail ticker and the default font I found the Ticker could be turned off ( hide ) and that even the system font is configurable. I tried a larger font size then returned to the default. -- Best regards, Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version d
Hi , I was reading over the archives and noticed a earlier discussion on version d. I just downloaded TB a few days ago and paid the registration fee today. I have version c, ( still waiting on my registration code to arrive). Is it possible to get version d in English? Sorry I do not speak Dutch and I think it was a dutch web site link that was posted. -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Friday, April 19, 2002, 5:50:19 AM, Michael scribbled: MTA What about with Trend Micro's PC-Cillin or OfficeScan? Does anyone MTA know if there's anything special needed so that all of TB's mail is MTA scanned? I'm using PC-Cillin 2000 with no problems. It scans all POP3 mail coming in without a plug-in. I've seen no problems except one. It detected the KLEZ virus and deleted it, but did not delete the mail from the server. I had to log in through PINE an kill the message. Mike smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: PC Pro Approves!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lynna Lunsford [LL] wrote: ... LL I found the Ticker could be turned off ( hide ) and that even the LL system font is configurable. I tried a larger font size then LL returned to the default. Just a couple tips the veterans already know about... :-) The tickers main advantages aren't so readily evident. For those new users and participants to the list, it may be useful to note that unlike the animated bat icon that will animate if there are any unread messages in any of your accounts the ticker can: i) Show you only those new messages that have arrived in particular folders. You can also configure it to show unread messages that are below a certain age. Yes, the scrolling can be distracting and this is why I use a small font and keep the ticker in the lower left hand corner of my screen and about 1.5 inches wide. :-) Also.. ii) if double clicked on, open a folder view containing all messages which it's displaying. If you double click on the ticker and only one message is displayed without a message list, just go to the View menu and enable 'Message List'. This view window has it's own configurable list settings. The 'folder' column in the message list is particularly useful in this view since it will tell you where each new message really resides, i.e., which account and which folder in the account. I personally read most of my mail using the ticker browser window. I thread the message list by folder and in descending order. What this does is group the messages by folder and then threads them in descending order of date. Really a great alternative to browsing on a per folder basis and among all the other already read messages. - -- Allie C Martin - (List Moderator) PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2Body=%20 ®TB! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1.2600 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8wADmV8nrYCsHF+IRAmpCAJ94nJuwHNUKuPkHUqIj6f675Zx8QwCcCeec J6Sye7+plKCogSqg7jnjZIs= =1O5z -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
Hello Marck, MDP Then again, while I think that custom toolbars will be both useful and MDP welcome, I think about how often I use a mouse to control TB and find MDP it's not a lot. E-mail is a very keyboard-centric activity. I seldom MDP use the mouse when in a read, reply, write, send cycle. I totally agree that mail business is very keyboard centric. So, I wonder if there isn't a way to enhance this. I just worked with the newsreader Gravity and I'm very impressed by the way one can navigate with keystrokes. Navigating in panes It's very comfortable pressing the keys 1, 2 or 3 for changing the window focus. This seems very superior to the TAB and SHIFT+TAB solution. May I ask if this can be realised in TB! too? The keys are not in use in the folder and text panes and in the thread pane they start only the quick search (I could live with the loss of quickly searching for 1, 2 or 3). Closing threads I know there is a way to close *all* threads in TB! with SHIFT+CTRL+* regardeless which mail in a thread has the focus. But closing only a *single* thread with - is only possible when the first mail in a thread has the focus. Here too, Gravity seems superior, as - will close a *single* thread (and leaving others expanded) on *any* mail in the thread. Is there a way to achieve this in TB!? Besides this (and other flaws I will find in the future ;-) TB! is an outstanding software. -- Regards Bernhard Kohl Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: PC Pro Approves!
Hi Allie, Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:35:01 AM, you wrote: Allie C Martin Just a couple tips the veterans already know about... :-) Thanks for the tips, I will experiment with them and see how it goes. I don't suppose the color of the ticker background and text is configurable? I may have missed it, would be nice if it could be changed. : ) -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lynna, @19 April 2002, 03:16:56 -0800 (12:16 UK time) Lynna Lunsford wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] William Moore To be honest (and biased) he's over the moon about William Moore everything except the mail ticker and the default font (... for the mail ticker) I found the Ticker could be turned off ( hide ) So did he... and that even the system font is configurable. I tried a larger font size then returned to the default. He ended up customizing the ticker font, setting it for 30 minute-old high priority messages, after which he loved feature that too! - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8wARaOeQkq5KdzaARAuhqAKDxECrOQibIsUXO7wIlOtngYakpUQCfazl3 WXuJnj7yIrzH1y6t/cI3G6U= =bKkF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: PC Pro Approves!
Hi Marck, Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:49:44 AM, you wrote: Marck D Pearlstone So did he... and that even the system font is configurable. I tried a larger font size then returned to the default. Marck D Pearlstone He ended up customizing the ticker font, setting it for 30 minute-old Marck D Pearlstone high priority messages, after which he loved feature that too! I see that now, and found that you can customize the color of the font, but not the background color. I can see, that after playing around with it some, that it is a cool feature. My only pick would be that I would like to have a option to change the background color. But then it would be perfect and we cant have that can we ? : ) btw, I thought about sending in a suggestion to Lockergome about The Bat the only thing is their subscriber base is so large that when people start hitting the web site and doing downloads that some servers cant handle it. Happened today, but If the ritlabs server could handle the strain, it would sure give TB some exposure here in the U.S. What do you think? Should I ? ( send it to Lockegnome?) -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lynna Lunsford [LL] wrote: ... LL Thanks for the tips, I will experiment with them and see how it LL goes. I don't suppose the color of the ticker background and text LL is configurable? I may have missed it, would be nice if it could LL be changed. : ) I should have said in my last message to right click the ticker to see the configuration choices. It was just a knee jerk thing to say, 'and select properties.' ;-) - -- Allie C Martin - (List Moderator) PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2Body=%20 ®TB! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1.2600 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8wAq0V8nrYCsHF+IRAk7WAKDWyCAqSE2HwbMYJzAsWeljtWOB6ACgkcIc IR28q5XEmfZCZLEGSdmJ6jc= =Ra9t -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: PC Pro Approves!
Hash: MD5 Hi Allie, Friday, April 19, 2002, 4:16:51 AM, you wrote: Allie C Martin I should have said in my last message to right click the ticker to see Allie C Martin the configuration choices. It was just a knee jerk thing to say, 'and Allie C Martin select properties.' ;-) Thanks, found it! : ) - -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6 iQEVAwUAPMAMVrRVZNOxBeEvAQFAtAf+IPK7HUMXYp+3TwihlekTQpPEXLJfUBjT h/cWTmBsijIRBsAzrLsQPm9Iie8Bj6+koSZni/LQNSm1PymA3f/cJNAttZ5lJYyE bR53ujlQpP2dxbwVhAtcxjV8PwVDlwlv2EYaY299AzgqK8LZYQnLGgfArtPnb6jW N/gMDl+Gu95kmAEA9/46CdXtAR+t3R/pxRw+NIM5P1oK1IF26jQfrxdUP0Y+Px64 0lPhPCRezEN1BccziwobyfpI78OPEDMRXQtOQow7DhQJFgoDyK7mOZkNlmV5fT9Z bPxlarzlHt1czyIepQvg3Q8YFP4nMGP9K3GkUS486kIED7wpvtpzCQ== =mHz+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lynna Lunsford [LL] wrote: ... LL Thanks for the tips, I will experiment with them and see how it LL goes. I don't suppose the color of the ticker background and text LL is configurable? I may have missed it, would be nice if it could LL be changed. : ) Only the font can be changed. Right click the ticker and select its properties to see how it can be configured. - -- Allie C Martin -- List Moderator PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2Body=%20 ®TB! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1.2600 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8wAprV8nrYCsHF+IRAtQXAKC1xTeizA0oieGuHO4Ix9Hx2Z07PACgqteV hVoleFWXJlczVHW/H5UlUMs= =HXZH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Folks, I've seen the discussions concerning anti-virus plug-ins, and I'm wondering what advantage that has over a program that monitors all incoming traffic. Mike smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hi Michael, Friday, April 19, 2002, 4:22:44 AM, you wrote: Michael Disabato Folks, Michael Disabato I've seen the discussions concerning anti-virus plug-ins, and I'm Michael Disabato wondering what advantage that has over a program that monitors all Michael Disabato incoming traffic. Michael Disabato Mike Actually AVG has a resident shield that does monitor all traffic Internet or otherwise. Even without the plug in it would work, theoretically anyway. According to info at the grisoft.com web, every time you access a file whether it on a disk or during a download resident shield is checking / monitoring / runs in the background. I don't know the advantages over the plug in, I am using both, I figured it TB web site had it available for download they did so for a reason. But as a newbie I have limited knowledge on the need /reasoning of it. All I know is it works for me. -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, @19 April 2002, 12:36:39 +0100 David Elliott wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only 'd' version that I know of is SecureBat!. all the others appear to be 'c'. (I could be wrong.) You are g. 'd' implements the new interface for Imad's PGP 6.5.8 custom TB plug-in. Also, I've seen someone using and 'e' release today too. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8wBM9OeQkq5KdzaARAlRJAKDGPg+oRTTAe/01d1xJUBXSUNoj6QCfYenD ZbGrjaE82FHplrPV/Ibw27E= =IvhT -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lynna, @19 April 2002, 04:17:04 -0800 (13:17 UK time) Lynna Lunsford wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What do you think? Should I ? ( send it to Lockegnome?) I think so - there are a number of alternate download servers available from the download site. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8wBDTOeQkq5KdzaARAsGwAKDL5/abfk0+91hexVoUvMYWgi1N6wCfeES5 hJCqiGW012osR5Qt7RHitGc= =/daO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hail Marck On 19 April 2002 at 13:53:14 +0100 (which was 13:53 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone graced us with these comments DE The only 'd' version that I know of is SecureBat!. all the others appear DE to be 'c'. (I could be wrong.) MDP You are g. 'd' implements the new interface for Imad's PGP 6.5.8 MDP custom TB plug-in. Ok but it is not on public release yet. MDP Also, I've seen someone using and 'e' release today too. And the only place I can find that is www.batmail.de. It is not even on the official site yet. - -- Good Bye, ___ David | SecureBat! 1.60 d / iKey1000 | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2K Server 5.0.2195 SP2 | International | | Religion must still be allowed to be a collateral security to virtue. | ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) Comment: GnuPG Signed, sealed, delivered. iD8DBQE8wBtt+Yrx5mUPRTQRAuHuAJ9UQNzXMheVjPSxIsDbWuWj3d3eDwCgpfkC UjNq3NA79zKw+rUUNXwzhpE= =jPWm -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: version d
Hi David, Friday, April 19, 2002, 5:28:11 AM, you wrote: David Elliott -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- David Elliott Hash: SHA1 David Elliott Hail Marck David Elliott On 19 April 2002 at 13:53:14 +0100 (which was 13:53 where I live) Marck D David Elliott Pearlstone graced us with these comments DE The only 'd' version that I know of is SecureBat!. all the others appear DE to be 'c'. (I could be wrong.) MDP You are g. 'd' implements the new interface for Imad's PGP 6.5.8 MDP custom TB plug-in. David Elliott Ok but it is not on public release yet. MDP Also, I've seen someone using and 'e' release today too. David Elliott And the only place I can find that is www.batmail.de. It is not even on the David Elliott official site yet. I found the it: 18 04. 02 The bat! E-mail Client, aktuelle. EXE-Datei (v1. 60e, nur. EXE, score18 04. 2002 ) Alas, but the link does not work. This was on the dutch site you mentioned. -- Regards, Lynna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I use %TONAME in the Subject line? (Cont'd)
Hello Marck, Thursday, April 18, 2002, 10:56:50 PM, you wrote: You're using the latest TB, so you have a slightly whacky yet more elegant solution available. Macros have more quoting possibilities than and '. In fact, the first character that follows the name of the macro becomes the delimiter. So suddenly, you have a whole wealth of them! Like: %SUBJECT=#%ABTOHandle other text by me#, or some other character that you are certain isn't going to appear in the name. Thank you for the tip. I thought only the single quote was allowed. Macros are very powerful and the Quick Template facility is excellent. Obviously, I have a lot to learn. -- Best regards, Costasmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which PGP version best suits The Bat?
I'm using PGP version 6.5.8 freeware with the relative Bat plugin. Recently, there is a lof of discussion about Imad's ckt build of PGP. I was wondering, is there any advantage as far as The Bat! is concerned, in using one version instead of the other? -- Best regards, Costas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Michael, On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 07:22:44 -0500GMT (19-4-02, 14:22 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: MD I've seen the discussions concerning anti-virus plug-ins, and I'm MD wondering what advantage that has over a program that monitors all MD incoming traffic. A program that monitors all your incoming traffic, will block TB's downloading of infected messages. That way TB can't finish it's receiving messages and will try to download the same messages over and over, because the server doesn't delete them. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:44:31 +0100GMT (4:44 AM EDST) William Moore wrote: For those in the UK, the June issue of PC Pro carries a great article by Davey Winder (their internet/email guru) extolling the virtues of TB! It's over two pages long - I can't remember a longer one devoted to one product. He was so impressed he bought a licence after using his review copy for a week. The magazine goes on sale next week and the article should be available on the PC Pro website www.pcpro.co.uk I couldn't find the review on PC Pro's website. Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Roelof, Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:10:35 PM, you wrote: RO A program that monitors all your incoming traffic, will block TB's RO downloading of infected messages. That way TB can't finish it's RO receiving messages and will try to download the same messages over and RO over, because the server doesn't delete them. I have never experienced this. AVG from grisoft allows the downloads to finish, and only lets me know that I have a virus when I go to open the attachment/email. Doesn't affect downloading whatsoever whichis logical as a virus is not going to execute just by being downloaded. -- Best regards, Johnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
ON Friday, April 19, 2002, 4:45:31 PM, you wrote: C Hi, C Disaster total this morning as Norton Anti Virus detected the C IFrame.Exploit virus in a message and disabled my main input box. C Any clue what I should do ? Hi Jean-Luc, Cab't you disable Norton, then delete the email and re-activate Norton? -- Best regards, Gerard Insert Cookie Here-- Undocumented Opcode: BCR - Backspace Card Reader Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version d
Hi Lynna, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 06:23:11 [GMT -0800], you wrote: LL Your signature shows you as using the e version, so have you LL noticed any differences? The only difference so far is the incorrect diplaying of the Created time. According to TB, your message was created at 00:23 my local time (which is +0200 UTC). Your message was created at 06:23 [-0800], which should be 16:23 my local time (10 hours difference). I guess the HTML fix was the incorrect displaying of one particular HTML message posted to TBBETA, but that was always displayed correctly on my machine. No difference there. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60e on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Mandara, I can't find any advantage even of monitoring traffic at all. By my experience it is much faster (and cheaper, regarding resources and online time) to use some real-time AV monitor which will react if you try to deal with infected attachment. There is definitely an advantage in monitoring traffic because not al virus are spread in attached files. As an example, take a look at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in this list with Subject: IFrame.Exploit virus and http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_98918.htm -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
Hello Corobori, On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 at 10:45:31 [GMT -0400], you wrote: C Disaster total this morning as Norton Anti Virus detected the C IFrame.Exploit virus in a message and disabled my main input box. C Any clue what I should do ? I would temporarily disable NAV, open your inbox, find the infected message, delete it, *then* delete it from the trash, *then* Compress and Purge. Cheers, Leif Gregory -- List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user) PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F Web Site http://www.PCWize.com TB FAQ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html Using The Bat! 1.60c under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a Pentium III 500 MHz notebook with 256MB. Tagline of the day: When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. -Robert Heinlein. Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: IFrame.Exploit virus
Hello Gerard, Friday, April 19, 2002, 11:30:57 AM, you wrote: G Hi Jean-Luc, Cab't you disable Norton, then delete the email and G re-activate Norton? I guess I could I am just worried that doing this it could do some damages in my machine. Even on Norton's website they don't describe what the IFrame.Exploit virus does ! NAV says: No additional information and Likelihood: Rate -- Best regards, Jean-Lucwww.corobori.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: PC Pro Approves!
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:09:53 +0100GMT (11:09 AM EDST) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Thank you, Marck, I'll try again. The magazine goes on sale next week and the article should be available on the PC Pro website www.pcpro.co.uk I couldn't find the review on PC Pro's website. Correct. The magazine is not yet on sale and has only been delivered to subscribers, who get it usually a week before it hits the shelves. The web site lags behind this by a week or so. Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
Hello Corobori, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 11:57:52 -0400, you wrote concerning 'IFrame.Exploit virus': ... G Hi Jean-Luc, Cab't you disable Norton, then delete the email and G re-activate Norton? I guess I could I am just worried that doing this it could do some damages in my machine. A virus can't do a thing without your interaction. If you don't execute it nothing can happen. So you can safely disable Norton and delete the file. -- Best regards, David ** This Virus requires Microsoft Windows. ** [TB! 1.60d] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Won't Exit
Hi all, I have a problem in that TB will not exit cleanly if another application uses it to generate and mail a message. The emails work fine. The other program kicks off the mail. TB then asks which account to use and prompty send off the message. After this, however, TB will not exit. I must use the Task Manager to kill it. Stefan --- Stefan Zauchenberger Managing Partner ICE Systems, L.L.C. www.useice.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 913.481.3141 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Om 18:09 op vrijdag 19 april 2002, David van Zuijlekom: Hi Jean-Luc, Cab't you disable Norton, then delete the email and re-activate Norton? I guess I could I am just worried that doing this it could do some damages in my machine. A virus can't do a thing without your interaction. If you don't execute it nothing can happen. So you can safely disable Norton and delete the file. err! do not delete the file or you'll be losing all messages in your inbox! Mrten. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt7 iQA/AwUBPMA2z0tQMadp+KslEQJYtACbBm0h17T4LzGkU0ECtNVKS4WrK3gAn23n nfYeVanZ8BrMKhoBqggFAnYc =BT9b -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
On Friday, April 19, 2002, 11:25:00 AM, Mrten wrote: err! do not delete the file or you'll be losing all messages in your inbox! this would appear to demonstrate a real advantage to storing attachments separately, and/or scanning messages before they get into the inbox. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
Hi, David van Zuijlekom wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : A virus can't do a thing without your interaction. If you don't execute it nothing can happen. So you can safely disable Norton and delete the file. Correction: this particular virus can do something without the user's interaction (when opened in Outlook Express/Internet Explorer) if they don't have MS's IFrame patch. For Bat users this also applies should they decide to open an infected HTML part in an external browser--then again, this already constitutes interaction. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.60c under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Geoff, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 11:23:27 [GMT +0100], you wrote: GL They (Symantec) told me that NAV 2002 scans access to the hard GL drives and both mail ports. However, they also told me that it would GL stop TB dead in its tracks because you could not configure NAV to GL automatically quarantine or delete without human intervention just GL infected mail. Ah, that is more precise. So we now agree that the mail scanning part is still there, but they changed its behaviour. GL [...] I believed them and went to a lot of trouble to obtain old GL stock of NAV 2001. Ah, yes, I remember that discussion. BTW, is that --- after the quoted part in your messages really necessary? It is caught by the %QUOTES replacement in my reply template and every text below (i.e. your text) is cut out because it is mistaken for an advertisement. That makes it a bit harder to reply to your e-mails. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60e on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Won't Exit
Hello Stefan, I have a problem in that TB will not exit cleanly if another application uses it to generate and mail a message. The emails work fine. The other program kicks off the mail. TB then asks which account to use and prompty send off the message. Sorry, I can't help with your problem. But I would be very interested to know what specific application(s) you mean by another application, and how did you get it to work. Because I am trying with WinFax Pro and TB and I can't get it to work. Thanks. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
Hello Mrten, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 18:25:00 +0200, you wrote concerning 'IFrame.Exploit virus': ... err! do not delete the file or you'll be losing all messages in your inbox! No I didn't mean to delete the whole .tbb file but only the attachment (right click on the attachment and then delete). -- Best regards, David ** I'm fascinated by the way memory diffuses fact. ** [TB! 1.60d] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delete from server
Hi, I set up my account with the Delete message from server when it is removed from Trash. I had a go at it, received the message, deleted it and removed it from the Trash but it was still available on the server. Am I missing something here ? Jean-Luc Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Defaults for Mail Dispatcher
Hello all, I always use Mail Dispatcher for one of my accounts because 95% (or even more) of the e-mail I receive in this account, quite a bit BTW, is just spam and pure junk. But when dispatcher opens it marks all messages as Read and Receive. So, the first thing I do every time is Global Reset Receive, then Global Set Delete, and then just mark Receive one by one the messages I am interested in. It is not really a big deal doing the global reset and global set, but I was wondering if there is a way to change the defaults. Thanks in advance. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
error message from email
well, I'm not sure what happened here. I know I replied to a message that was sent to me, I'm looking in my sent folder and the message says it was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , yet here is the error message I received: The original message was received at Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:50:54 -0500 (CDT) from IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [212.56.195.233] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 541 Failure: this address is blacklisted) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.ritlabs.com.: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=2767 541 Failure: this address is blacklisted 554 5.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable did ritlabs blacklist that address ? Did I do something wrong ? thanks, Paul Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hello Lars, BTW, is that --- after the quoted part in your messages really necessary? It is caught by the %QUOTES replacement in my reply template and every text below (i.e. your text) is cut out because it is mistaken for an advertisement. That makes it a bit harder to reply to your e-mails. From my point of view, that is something that should be _fixed_ in the %QUOTES macro. Maybe in this list we can ask the users (most or all TB users) to not use certain key combinations and they (we) will perhaps understand the reason(s) why. But I use TB for a lot of mail lists and newsgroups and I shouldn't have to ask all the users in those lists and newsgroups to please not use --- because my %QUOTES macro -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BUG - Reading Confirmation
I have Reading Confirmation set to Put in Outbox / Prompt before action for my business account as I like to be in control of the thing. I also read mail using the preview mode/view. Here's what happens: If I'm reading a message in my business account and then click down into my personal account to read something, that's when the prompt for the reading confirmation pops up, as it doesn't pop up until you remove focus from the message. However, this way the confirmation message actually gets placed into my personal account's outbox along with it picking up all of that account's settings. Not good. As much as I love the way TB! lets you change accounts on the fly I'm finding more and more instances where it doesn't do it thoroughly enough and mixes commands between them. -- ò¸ó Nick Danger [MUA: 1.60c] [OS: Windows ME 4 90] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version d
Hello David! On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 3:28:11 PM you wrote: MDP You are g. 'd' implements the new interface for Imad's PGP 6.5.8 MDP custom TB plug-in. Ok but it is not on public release yet. d is - although only per announcement on TBBETA. The plug-in isn't as it is in beta (although stable and working correct). -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.60d on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C It's never too late to start all over again. (John Kay) Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Big review of TB! in UK PC-PRO magaine...
Hello Marck! On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 11:30:48 AM you wrote: They've put TB on the cover disk too! Well, that has been done several times by at least one leading comp mag in Germany (*PCWelt*). I think, even *PCPro* has done it. I hope the article will come in one form or another to Germany's *PCPro*. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.60d on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C The First Amendment presupposes that right conclusions are more likely to be gathered out of a multitude of tongues, than through any kind of authoritative selection. (Judge Learned Hand as cited in New York Times v. Sullivan) Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which PGP version best suits The Bat?
Hello Costas! On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 4:13:56 PM you wrote: I'm using PGP version 6.5.8 freeware with the relative Bat plugin. Recently, there is a lof of discussion about Imad's ckt build of PGP. I was wondering, is there any advantage as far as The Bat! is concerned, in using one version instead of the other? There are some advantages using CKT over other (especially original NAI) versions, but none related specifically to TB!. I am quite sure that Imad's plug-in will also work with other PGP versions. If you are interested in the enhancements of CKT's versions over others, contact me off list. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.60d on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for your actions. Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PC Pro Approves!
Hello Lynna! On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 2:17:04 PM you wrote: My only pick would be that I would like to have a option to change the background color. But then it would be perfect and we cant have that can we ? : ) That doesn't affect me, since I like to have a black desktop (well, not quite as there are some items that use other colours). With a black background of the MT it looks quite cool when the - in my case green - message headers scroll through. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.60d on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Life is short ... if you are lucky. (Derek Leveret) Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
On 19 April 2002, 18:16, Lars Geiger wrote: BTW, is that --- after the quoted part in your messages really necessary? It is caught by the %QUOTES replacement in my reply template and every text below (i.e. your text) is cut out because it is mistaken for an advertisement. That makes it a bit harder to reply to your e-mails. ~~~ OK, I've changed it for three tildes. Hopefully that is acceptable. My template included no space after the dashes -- so TB shouldn't have had that issue. FWIW, I've just tried replying to my own message, and I don't notice the issue to which you refer. But then, I'm not using a humungous regexpvbg -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Winamp currently playing Toni Braxton - UnBreak My Heart Antibiotics ... for the man who has everything Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BUG - Reading Confirmation
Hello Nick, 19. april 2002, 20:13:44, you wrote: ND However, this way the confirmation message actually gets placed into ND my personal account's outbox along with it picking up all of that ND account's settings. Not good. I think I reported this one quite long ago on TBBETA (either that, or I wanted to report it, as it happens to me, too)... -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 98 4.10.. A ] The less work an organization produces, the more frequently it reorganizes. -- Organizational Law Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IFrame.Exploit virus
Hello Markus, 19. april 2002, 18:47:04, you wrote: MG For Bat users this also applies should they MG decide to open an infected HTML part in an external browser--then again, MG this already constitutes interaction. I doubt that The Bat would extract other attachments than just the HTML file, so there is no danger. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 98 4.10.. A ] Don't force it, get a larger hammer. -- Anthony's Law of Force Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hello Geoff, ~~~ OK, I've changed it for three tildes. Hopefully that is acceptable. My template included no space after the dashes -- so TB shouldn't have had that issue. FWIW, I've just tried replying to my own message, and I don't notice the issue to which you refer. But then, I'm not using a humungous regexpvbg The three ~~~ also fail. It is a problem with the %QUOTE macro generally used in reply templates. It just tries to be too smart. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: IFrame.Exploit virus Solved !
Hi guys, I eventually solved the solution this way: 1. Disable NAV 2. Backup the account. 3. Delete the account 4. Restore from backup. BTW I had the attachments save in another folder Jean-Luc Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Miguel, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 19:58:08 [GMT +0200], you wrote: MAU From my point of view, that is something that should be _fixed_ in MAU the %QUOTES macro. Maybe in this list we can ask the users (most MAU or all TB users) to not use certain key combinations and they (we) MAU will perhaps understand the reason(s) why. Wait a moment. It's not a problem with the %QUOTES macro. I use a RegExp to strip away unnecessary things when replying. But this RegExp is designed to take care of certain advertisements (from yahoogroups, for example). And this stripped off everything after the --- in Geoff's message. So I only had the things in my reply which I had said in the e-mail before. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60e on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Miguel, On Saturday, April 20, 2002 at 20:50:44 [GMT +0200], you wrote: MAU The three ~~~ also fail. It is a problem with the %QUOTE macro MAU generally used in reply templates. It just tries to be too smart. It works fine here, with both a RegExp and the standard %QUOTES macro. AFAIK, the %QUOTES macro only strips of a sig delimiter, it can't even handle PGP's changed sig delimiter. I wouldn't say that TB is trying to be too smart in this respect. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60e on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
On Friday, April 19, 2002, 1:50:44 PM, Miguel A. Urech wrote: The three ~~~ also fail. It is a problem with the %QUOTE macro generally used in reply templates. It just tries to be too smart. If I am not misunderstanding your complaint, I'm not experiencing your problem. --- causes no problems in replying in my setup and ~~~ is equally harmless. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Dwight, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 14:08:45 [GMT -0500], you wrote: DAC If I am not misunderstanding your complaint, I'm not experiencing DAC your problem. It was my complaint (although it wasn't intended as a complaint), and the problem is (as I've written before), that I use a RegExp to strip advertisements from my replies and this interferes with the --- in Geoff's message. Probably I should have had a look at my RegExp *before* a asked this on the list (and I should have asked off list), but that's too late now. Sorry if this wasted more bandwidth than it was worth. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60e on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The BAT! and NAV
Hi Geoff, On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 19:07:32 [GMT +0100], you wrote: GL OK, I've changed it for three tildes. Hopefully that is acceptable. GL My template included no space after the dashes -- so TB shouldn't GL have had that issue. It was not an issue with TB believing this to be a sig delimiter. The problem is that the RegExp I use was designed to strip off advertisement, which is e.g. used on Yahoogroups, when replying. But it uses a line of dashes to recognize this. That was the reason why everything you wrote was removed when I replied. Perhaps the RegExp will need some more tweaking, though. :-) GL FWIW, I've just tried replying to my own message, and I don't notice GL the issue to which you refer. But then, I'm not using a humungous GL regexpvbg I use one, only for this account, the others work fine with the standard %QUOTES macro. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60e on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Won't Exit
Hi Stefan, i had the same Problem with TB 1.6d. The program always remained in RAM, using 99% of my CPU time. An Update to 1.6e solved this problem for me. Now everything is perfect. SZ Hi all, SZ I have a problem in that TB will not exit cleanly if another application SZ uses it to generate and mail a message. The emails work fine. The other SZ program kicks off the mail. TB then asks which account to use and SZ prompty send off the message. SZ After this, however, TB will not exit. I must use the Task Manager to SZ kill it. SZ Stefan --- Regards, BlueStrike Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Won't Exit
Hello BlueStrike, On Friday, April 19 2002 at 12:49 PM PDT, you wrote: An Update to 1.6e solved this problem for me. Now everything is perfect. I'm sure there are a lot of people confused over TB's version numbering system... or lack thereof. If you don't mind telling us, where did you get v1.60e? There are Users who cannot even find v1.60d... including me... with v1.60c being the latest release. Even the FTP Beta site only shows 1.60c. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: version d
Hello Lars, Friday, April 19, 2002, 7:32:18 AM, you wrote: LL Your signature shows you as using the e version, so have you LL noticed any differences? Lars Geiger The only difference so far is the incorrect diplaying of the Created Lars Geiger time. According to TB, your message was created at 00:23 my local time Lars Geiger (which is +0200 UTC). Your message was created at 06:23 [-0800], which Lars Geiger should be 16:23 my local time (10 hours difference). Lars Geiger I guess the HTML fix was the incorrect displaying of one particular HTML Lars Geiger message posted to TBBETA, but that was always displayed correctly on my Lars Geiger machine. No difference there. Well I am in Alaska,(USA) on Alaska time, maybe that has something do to with it ; ) -- Best regards, Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Miguel, Friday, April 19, 2002, 7:47:28 AM, you wrote: Miguel A. Urech There is definitely an advantage in monitoring traffic because not al Miguel A. Urech virus are spread in attached files. As an example, take a look at: Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in this list with Subject: Miguel A. Urech IFrame.Exploit virus Miguel A. Urech and http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_98918.htm Also my experience with AVG was that it notifies me as I download e-mail. If a e-mail is infected, it will grab the infected file and place it in the virus vault. This happens when I am downloading, not just when I open the e-mail or the attachment. I like that, it never gets a chance to be opened or to infect. You have the choice once a file is in the vault to try and clean it or you can delete it entirely. Very seldom is one cleanable (IMHO). -- Best regards, Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A good tool: Win32.Klez worm sent by me via The Bat!?
Hi, A colleague of mine has just received a message from me (without my knowledge of sending it) which appears to be related to the Win32.Klez worm. There was no attachment from me. How could this happen with TB? I don't use Outlook, and I thought that this worm exploited Outlook. I am VERY vigilant about attachments, and have TB! set up to not allow opening of *.COM,*.EML,*.CMD,*.JS,*.PL,*.BAS,*.JAVA,*.REG, *.EXE,*.VBS,*.PIF,*.SCR,*.SHS files. It appears that I have somehow been infected, though NAV has not picked up anything. The following includes the original message. Where you see X is where I have tried to avoid posting her contact info publicly: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Delivered-To: XX Received: from outbox.attcanada.ca (outbox.attcanada.ca [207.245.244.41]) by fep6.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EEB6D5E for XX; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:29:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from win-mb50-139.netcom.ca (win-mb50-139.netcom.ca [216.191.162.11]) by outbox.attcanada.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567332E2 for XX; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:29:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:29:05 -0500 From: Mike Harlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60d) Reply-To: Mike Harlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: XX Subject: Re: A good tool In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitriginal Message- From: Mike Harlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 19, 2002 4:29 PM To: XX Subject: Re: A good tool This is a good tool I expect you would like it. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -- Regards, Mike Using The Bat! 1.60d under Windows 98 4.10 Build A = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Mike Harlos Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada PGP Keys: DH/DSS- 0x8CD85BCERSA- 0xBBDB40B1 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Lynna, On Friday, April 19 2002 at 02:19 PM PDT, you wrote: Roelof Otten over, because the server doesn't delete them. Here is what AVG has to say about it (I pasted from AVG's own help files): Would you mind terribly trimming down the number of characters you use for a quote prefix? By using first and last name... which is only for TB users and only if they have their preferences set to allow for it... you minimise the actual number of characters for comments. Based on a 74 character normal line length, one can only type in 55 or so characters of actual text before the line starts to wrap. Thanks very much.. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Nick, Friday, April 19, 2002, 1:42:05 PM, you wrote: Nick Andriash Would you mind terribly trimming down the number of characters you use for Nick Andriash a quote prefix? By using first and last name... which is only for TB users Nick Andriash and only if they have their preferences set to allow for it... you Nick Andriash minimise the actual number of characters for comments. Based on a 74 Nick Andriash character normal line length, one can only type in 55 or so characters of Nick Andriash actual text before the line starts to wrap. Nick Andriash Thanks very much.. Considering I have had the program installed less than a week, would you send me detailed instructions on how to accomplish this? I am perfectly willing to accommodate I just need to know how this is done. -- Best regards, Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version d
Hello Dierk Haasis, On Friday, April 19 2002 at 10:26 AM PDT, you wrote: MDP You are g. 'd' implements the new interface for Imad's PGP 6.5.8 MDP custom TB plug-in. I have that Plugin Marck, but I still only show v1.60c. Ok but it is not on public release yet. d is - although only per announcement on TBBETA. I've seen no such announcement on TBBETA, nor does v1.60d exist on the Beta Download page. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
Hello Lynna Lunsford, On Friday, April 19 2002 at 02:50 PM PDT, you wrote: Considering I have had the program installed less than a week, would you send me detailed instructions on how to accomplish this? Sure no problem... it is an often overlooked preference setting. There are actually two settings that you should set: 1) Options/Editor Preferences/General... down at the bottom you will see Quote Name Limit. This one is really for your benefit, and should reflect the number of characters *you* would like to see behind that turn up as quoted material. 2) Accounts/Properties/Templates/Reply... under Sender information used for quotation... you can set it as you like, but Initials or even First Name seems to be more a norm than having both the first and last name. I would say 50% choose None or Initials. While you are in the Account Properties... at the bottom of the page you will see two little check boxes. You should make sure that only the bottom one is checked. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV Plug-ins vs. Not
On Friday, April 19, 2002, 4:42:05 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: Would you mind terribly trimming down the number of characters you use for a quote prefix? I second that. It's very confusing since with the long prefixes they don't get tagged as replies with my settings and it's much more confusing to try to follow. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corrupted attachements
Good night list, The last few days i have a strange problem: if i receive pics as an attachment and i save them from TB! directly to a cd, they become corrupted. This causes my cd drive to freeze up and even my pc. I don't think it's a virus because my AV didn't gave me a warning. Also, it doesn't matter who sends me the pics. It's the same problem with different senders. Has anybody a clue what this could be? -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera. Man is a clever animal who behaves like an imbecile. - Albert Schweitzer. Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
