Re: Hang on mail check
I was checking my TBUDL and TBOT mail this morning and there were 96 new messages. I always use the connection center, normally without any problems. But for some reason, it would hang on message #64 while trying to get the headers. Sorry about the late reply - catching up with messages. I've had a similar problem a couple of times and found that I could retrieve all my messages using my Freeserve dialup. After collecting them this way I could use the Bat again with no problems. Best Wishes Sharon Stiles www.sharonstiles.co.uk Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[SOT] Spam Conference
Hello all, I know it is SOT but it may be of interest to anyone trying to filter/kill/fight spam: http://www.spamconference.org http://www.spamconference.org/abstracts.txt http://www.spamconference.org/proceedings2003.html -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Beta testing
Hello Marck, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 4:24:05 AM, you wrote: MDP I see that you prefer to read text in this order g: MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] to writing by way normal the in it MDP join can you, Yes. By coincidence, I happened to subscribe yesterday, but did not receive any messages yet, except for 1. Thanks to this message I took a closer look at it and found out that I had to reply to confirm my subscription! :-) .direction right the in writing not for, Sorry -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.62i Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Christophe, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:13:54 +0100 GMT (19/02/03, 07:13 +0700 GMT), Christophe wrote: I need an explanation ; sometimes when I retrieve my e-mails, the connection center seems to to messages, I see furtively reception of headers : reception message #1 for one message and nothing more, I look at, and neither the inbox accounts, nor the filtered folders have received an e-mail You have set TB to leave messages on server (Account / Properties / Mail Management). TB needs to download the header first to see whether this particular mail was downloaded before. If so, the mail will not be downloaded again. I go to see the view log and I have that : 19/02/2003, 00:53:00: FETCH - 1 Message(s) in the box, 0 New(s) 19/02/2003, 00:53:00: FETCH - Connexion terminated - 0 message(s) received Right. 1 message is on the server, but you downloaded it earlier. There is no new message (a message that you have not downloaded yet). So, no message is being downloaded. ;-) Do you think it comes from the fact I have a selected download filter based on a .txt file containing hundreds of e-mail spammers and an option to kill mail ? Not in this case, because the log clearly says that there was no new message. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Shopping tip: You can get shoes for 85 cents at bowling alleys. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Thomas, You have set TB to leave messages on server (Account / Properties / Mail Management). No I did not ! I directly delete messages received from server TB needs to download the header first to see whether this particular mail was downloaded before. If so, the mail will not be downloaded again. ah yes ! Right. 1 message is on the server, but you downloaded it earlier. There is no new message (a message that you have not downloaded yet). So, no message is being downloaded. ;-) ok , but how is it possible if I don't leave massages on the server ? It's strange... Thanks a lot -- Best regards, Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Christophe, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 9:39:41 AM, you wrote: C Hello Thomas, You have set TB to leave messages on server (Account / Properties / Mail Management). C No I did not ! I directly delete messages received from server TB needs to download the header first to see whether this particular mail was downloaded before. If so, the mail will not be downloaded again. C ah yes ! Right. 1 message is on the server, but you downloaded it earlier. There is no new message (a message that you have not downloaded yet). So, no message is being downloaded. ;-) C ok , but how is it possible if I don't leave massages on the server ? C It's strange... C Thanks a lot C -- C Best regards, C Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] C C Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: C http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Yeah, it is a strange problem. I still think you should use the dispatcher to see what the email is and whether it's spam or what. If nothing else, it might give us a direction to look in for the problem. Thanks for the spammer list! -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Christophe, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 9:39:41 AM, you wrote: C Hello Thomas, You have set TB to leave messages on server (Account / Properties / Mail Management). C No I did not ! I directly delete messages received from server TB needs to download the header first to see whether this particular mail was downloaded before. If so, the mail will not be downloaded again. C ah yes ! Right. 1 message is on the server, but you downloaded it earlier. There is no new message (a message that you have not downloaded yet). So, no message is being downloaded. ;-) C ok , but how is it possible if I don't leave massages on the server ? C It's strange... C Thanks a lot C -- C Best regards, C Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] C C Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: C http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Yeah, it is a strange problem. I still think you should use the dispatcher to see what the email is and whether it's spam or what. If nothing else, it might give us a direction to look in for the problem. Thanks for the spammer list! -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB and PC protection
I just had to rebuild my PC after a nasty crash and I'd love to hear your preferences/votes as far as the following are concerned, ESPECIALLY in the way they interact with TB, which is central to my work. Please vote for something you have actually been using! FIREWALL #1 choice #2 choice #3 choice ANTIVIRUS #1 choice #2 choice #3 choice OTHER? Thanks so much for taking a minute to post your recommendations! Best regards, Miles Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
Miles, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 3:54:59 PM, Miles wrote: M FIREWALL M #1 Norton Firewall M ANTIVIRUS M #1 Norton Antivirus -- bfn .kristina kfxdesign.net Using The Bat! 1.62i under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
ON Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 4:54:59 PM, you wrote: MJ FIREWALL MJ #1 choice Kerio (does much more) MJ #2 choice MJ #last choice ZoneLabs MJ ANTIVIRUS MJ #1 choiceNorton Antivirus MJ #2 choiceMcAffee MJ #3 choice? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Good players have the power to think while they are competing. Most golfers are not thinking even when they believe they are. They are only worrying. Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
Hello Miles! On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 9:54 AM, you wrote: M ... Please vote for something you have actually been using! M FIREWALL Tiny Personal Firewall M ANTIVIRUS Kaspersky -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
DEAD HORSE (was TB and PC protection)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Miles, @19-Feb-2003, 10:54 -0500 (15:54 UK time) Miles Johnson [MJ] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Sorry to do this to you but ... moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Miles. This topic is way off and I am forced to pronounce it dead. Please take it off-list or to TBOT. For anyone unfamiliar with Dead Horse policy, DEAD means DEAD. NO REPLIES to the list, only off-list or on TBOT. Thank you. /moderator I have replied to this on TBOT. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+U61WOeQkq5KdzaARAtguAKDVtRVJoiZvNeDUD+6aY/7q90gwowCfRNyd 0CwRIuT/fMHnSApvwYP5aBo= =OV+y -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
Hello Gerard, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 5:07:00 PM, you wrote: G ON Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 4:54:59 PM, you wrote: MJ FIREWALL MJ #1 choice Kerio (does much more) MJ #2 choice MJ #last choice ZoneLabs MJ ANTIVIRUS MJ #1 choiceNorton Antivirus MJ #2 choiceMcAffee MJ #3 choice? I'd rather recommend Tiny Personal Firewall, which is freeware yet good... and for a virus scanner a commercial product: F-Secure Antivirus, which uses 3 scanner modules at a time, thus theoretically being more efficent. plus it's easy to use. -- Best regards, Jeffreymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Quoted text in replies
Hello, I'm after some help with reply templates, and can't seem to find any answers in the usual places. Is is possible to have the sender's initials interpreted as below: John Smith = JS Smith, John = JS (instead of SJ) I.e. The comma separator tells TB! that this name has the last-name first. Thanks, -- Nick Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:31:18 +0700 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need an explanation ; sometimes when I retrieve my e-mails, the connection center seems to to messages, I see furtively reception of headers : reception message #1 for one message and nothing more, I look at, and neither the inbox accounts, nor the filtered folders have received an e-mail You have set TB to leave messages on server (Account / Properties / Mail Management). TB needs to download the header first to see whether this particular mail was downloaded before. If so, the mail will not be downloaded again. Beside the fact Christophe already denied your assumption let me correct you: The Bat! _does not_ download the headers of an e-mail if you've set Leave messages on server. It decides wether to fetch or to ignore a mail in that setup by inspecting the output of UIDL command, which only gives a list of server generated UIDs, one per message, and ideally the server generates the same UID for the same message when asked another time. If he doesn't you get every message until you delete it from server manually. But in no case The Bat! uses the headers to decide if a message was already downloaded, headers are only fetched when selective download is aktive of message dispatcher is invoked. -- Regards, Pit Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
Hi Miles, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:54:59 -0500 Miles Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote for something you have actually been using! FIREWALL #1 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] #2 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] #3 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] ANTIVIRUS #1 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] #2 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] #3 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] OTHER? If not already mentioned: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Peter Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Christophe, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:39:41 +0100 GMT (19/02/03, 21:39 +0700 GMT), Christophe wrote: You have set TB to leave messages on server (Account / Properties / Mail Management). No I did not ! I directly delete messages received from server Strange indeed. How can there be a message which is not new, then? Hm. Anyway, let's say there is a message and you delete from server. TB still needs to download the headers first, in order to compare them with your kill file. That's why you first see downloading header. Then, let's say the message fits your kill conditions as per .txt file. The message will be deleted on the server - and not be downloaded. So 0 messages received will still be right. Now there should be no message on your server any more. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. There are 10 different kinds of people in this world -- those who understand binary and those who don't. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Peter, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:24:00 +0100 GMT (19/02/03, 23:24 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: Beside the fact Christophe already denied your assumption let me correct you: The Bat! _does not_ download the headers of an e-mail if you've set Leave messages on server. It decides wether to fetch or to ignore a mail in that setup by inspecting the output of UIDL command, Ah, I stand corrected. I should watch TB's dialog better. Unfortunately, this is still not possible from within TB and I didn't check this particular dialog with Ethereal. But in no case The Bat! uses the headers to decide if a message was already downloaded, headers are only fetched when selective download is aktive of message dispatcher is invoked. ^ I know you mean or, not if. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. RealWorld? Is that where the pizza delivery guy comes from? Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quoted text in replies
Hallo Nick, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:16:34 +GMT (19-2-03, 17:16 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ND Is is possible to have the sender's initials interpreted as below: ND John Smith = JS ND Smith, John = JS (instead of SJ) Yes. %QuoteStyle='%- %SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)(\w)%- %REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%OFromFName%- %SUBPATT=1%- %SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)(\w)%- %REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%OFromLName%- %SUBPATT=1%-' I suppose there might be better solutions. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrapping of paragraphs in replies to HTML email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 at 22:39 GMT +, Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MDP I recommend that you use the recursive wrap macro listed in the MDP Macro library on the FAQ web site. MDP See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rewrap How does one use the recursive wrap macro in conjunction with the quote extraction macro to strip pgp sigs and ads? - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v1.63 Beta/7 under Windows 2000 5.0.2195 SP3 . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE+U7yV0srUtrrvVaERAifyAKCWeZ4I7QW0y+nnThTpPeUCIaiQKACfT7Er FSN7TpZAI/LTKXSI8zC7Iww= =D1UF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:34:21 +0700 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is aktive of message dispatcher is invoked. ^ I know you mean or, not if. ;-) This C :-) o 1 :-))) -- Regards, Pit Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrapping of paragraphs in replies to HTML email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, Kevin Coates wrote... MDP I recommend that you use the recursive wrap macro listed in the MDP Macro library on the FAQ web site. MDP See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rewrap How does one use the recursive wrap macro in conjunction with the quote extraction macro to strip pgp sigs and ads? Stab in the dark, but you could probably change %COMMENT on the first line to be: %COMMENT='%QINCLIDE=nameofpgpstrip' That would probably set %COMMENT to be the fixed quotes, and then run it on that instead. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBPlPAmCuD6BT4/R9zEQKFCQCguTGUVpLwYrksyueoqgau5Cb4aaoAn0Kc maRy5RGe1rCgpKw1hEPCy1VQ =1/IX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrapping of paragraphs in replies to HTML email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote... %COMMENT='%QINCLIDE=nameofpgpstrip' Silly fingers... should be %QINCLUDE not %QINCLIDE :) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBPlPB0SuD6BT4/R9zEQLP6wCeNPRo3Ca+vImKE+eWsC7Kiy9ZiM8AniD8 bbrQeWcmIoRV9yQQugBPSQs5 =lEDY -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB and PC protection
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PP Hi Miles, PP On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:54:59 -0500 Miles Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote for something you have actually been using! FIREWALL #1 choice PP [EMAIL PROTECTED] #2 choice PP [EMAIL PROTECTED] #3 choice PP [EMAIL PROTECTED] ANTIVIRUS #1 choice PP [EMAIL PROTECTED] #2 choice PP [EMAIL PROTECTED] #3 choice PP [EMAIL PROTECTED] OTHER? PP If not already mentioned: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now THAT'S very helpful... I'm afraid you missed the operative words, which were ESPECIALLY in the way they interact with TB. One would think that this would be of great interest to many TBUDL readers, who unlike me may not be familiar or signed on with TBOT. That's why I posted here. Peter I often agree with your posts but this time I think you're way off the mark. I will take this subject to TBOT but I do not believe that this should be OT at all (neither would you if you had spent the past few days rebuilding a crashed machine, well, at least one would hope...) Best regards, Miles Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Question
Here's a question... When I do a tools/backup in TB, does it back up the filters? What else does it back up? -- Best regards, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question
I just backup the whole theBat! directory as well as the registry entries. I have used theBat's backup feature before, but was very disapointed in it later when I tried to restore everything. -- ~John - - - David Calvarese wrote - - - D Here's a question... D When I do a tools/backup in TB, does it back up the filters? What else does it back up? - - - End of David Calvarese's message - - - Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question
Hello ~John, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 2:21:31 PM, you wrote: ~ I just backup the whole theBat! directory as well as the registry ~ entries. I have used theBat's backup feature before, but was very ~ disapointed in it later when I tried to restore everything. ~ -- ~ ~John ~ - - - David Calvarese wrote - - - D Here's a question... D When I do a tools/backup in TB, does it back up the filters? What else does it back up? ~ - - - End of David Calvarese's message - - - That's kinda hard to do to a floppy. -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Question
Floppy? Can you still get those? I tend to follow the Backup the directory method. I use CDs and archive them JC DC Hello ~John, DC Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 2:21:31 PM, you wrote: ~ I just backup the whole theBat! directory as well as the registry ~ entries. I have used theBat's backup feature before, but was very ~ disapointed in it later when I tried to restore everything. ~ -- ~ ~John ~ - - - David Calvarese wrote - - - D Here's a question... D When I do a tools/backup in TB, does it back up the filters? What else does it back up? ~ - - - End of David Calvarese's message - - - DC That's kinda hard to do to a floppy. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Question
Hello John, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 2:34:49 PM, you wrote: JLC Floppy? Can you still get those? JLC I tend to follow the Backup the directory method. I use CDs and archive them JLC JC DC Hello ~John, DC Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 2:21:31 PM, you wrote: ~ I just backup the whole theBat! directory as well as the registry ~ entries. I have used theBat's backup feature before, but was very ~ disapointed in it later when I tried to restore everything. ~ -- ~ ~John ~ - - - David Calvarese wrote - - - D Here's a question... D When I do a tools/backup in TB, does it back up the D filters? What else does it back up? ~ - - - End of David Calvarese's message - - - DC That's kinda hard to do to a floppy. JLC JLC Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: JLC http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html It's the easiest way to keep everything in sync between work, home, and laptop. Dave -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quoted text in replies
ON Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 6:11:01 PM, you wrote: RO I suppose there might be better solutions. Hi Roelof, I would suggest you set it in Account|properties|templates|reply and mark in the sender information used for quotation the initials box. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= It Is Time To Quit When... You have the thought that if you hole out from 140 yards you can still make bogie. Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question
Its easy to do with a CD-R -- ~John - - - David Calvarese wrote - - - D That's kinda hard to do to a floppy. - - - End of David Calvarese's message - - - Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question
Hello ~John, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 3:24:57 PM, you wrote: ~ Its easy to do with a CD-R ~ -- ~ ~John ~ - - - David Calvarese wrote - - - D That's kinda hard to do to a floppy. ~ - - - End of David Calvarese's message - - - Yeah, but one of the computers doesn't have a CDR/CDRW drive in it otherwise I would have used that solution. -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:
Hello Spyder, It works well on my system. I put a command line switch to checkall when it launches, but it works. Michael Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 11:25:14 PM, you wrote: S Does anyone use McAfee's spam killer? How does The Bat (and my 15 different S email accounts) deal with McAfee launching The Bat to read email and know to S which address to send it?? -- Best regards, Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought for the day : Cannot open file d:\bat\cookies for bat.txt Replied on 2/19/2003 at 1:58 PM using The Bat Ver 1.63 Beta/7 Attachments = none Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:
Hello Miles, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 7:54:59 AM, you wrote: MJ I just had to rebuild my PC after a nasty crash and I'd love to hear MJ your preferences/votes as far as the following are concerned, ESPECIALLY MJ in the way they interact with TB, which is central to my work. Please MJ vote for something you have actually been using! MJ FIREWALL MJ #1 choice Zone Alarm MJ #2 choice Black Ice MJ #3 choice none MJ ANTIVIRUS MJ #1 choice Panda Titanium (www.pandasoftware.com) MJ #2 choice MJ #3 choice MJ OTHER? MJ Thanks so much for taking a minute to post your recommendations! MJ Best regards, MJ Miles Johnson MJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] MJ Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 -- Best regards, Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought for the day : Cannot open file d:\bat\cookies for bat.txt Replied on 2/19/2003 at 2:02 PM using The Bat Ver 1.63 Beta/7 Attachments = none Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:
Hello Spyder, Works great. I use the /checkall swtich. Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 11:25:14 PM, you wrote: S Does anyone use McAfee's spam killer? How does The Bat (and my 15 different S email accounts) deal with McAfee launching The Bat to read email and know to S which address to send it?? -- Best regards, Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought for the day : Cannot open file d:\bat\cookies for bat.txt Replied on 2/19/2003 at 2:04 PM using The Bat Ver 1.63 Beta/7 Attachments = none Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quoted text in replies
Hallo Gerard, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:11:26 +0100GMT (19-2-03, 21:11 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO I suppose there might be better solutions. G I would suggest you set it in Account|properties|templates|reply G and mark in the sender information used for quotation the G initials box. That would give wrong initials, when the original sender had his name listed as lastname, firstname, because I've got that and I still get LF where Nick wanted FL as listed initials. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Miles, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 3:54:59 PM, you wrote: MJ I just had to rebuild my PC after a nasty crash and I'd love to hear MJ your preferences/votes as far as the following are concerned, ESPECIALLY MJ in the way they interact with TB, which is central to my work. Please MJ vote for something you have actually been using! MJ FIREWALL #1 choice Agnitum Outpost Personal Firewall Pro (or free) #2 choice Sygate Personal Firewall Pro (or free) MJ ANTIVIRUS #1 choice Sophos - There's a plug-in for The Bat! M - -- Regards, Martin Webster http://www.martinwebster.info/ All outgoing mail checked for viruses with Sophos Anti-Virus The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i Comment: http://www.martinwebster.info/martinwebster.asc iQA/AwUBPlQH+lv+PP8p0/caEQIXpACg7MtY/MpH/1xeHGo9ifcfJ6HE2VEAn0Ir C4rXGZLxHMCmUBHbjkvfnD4N =NcB1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Wrapping of paragraphs in replies to HTML email
O Oracles of TB! MDP See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rewrap Thanks for pointing me to the above web site. With the QT macros there I have been able to set up some nicely formatted templates for use within the company I work for (small company, 6 people, I do all the programming and network admin stuff). We recently switch to TB! to help us manage all the email we handle from different projects. I suspect that as the weeks progress I will have a number of questions for this list, which has been very helpful thus far! I have one question on the QT macro for wrapping HTML messages. After the quoted message has been formatted, there is normally around 6 blank lines. For example the template: blah blah blah ... QInclude=wq -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- has multiple blank lines between the quoted text and the terminating '=-=-=-=' line. Has anyone modified (or can suggest how to modify) the 'wq' QT macro so that trailing blank lines are not reproduced in the quoted text? Thanks again, David Using The Bat! Version 1.62 Christmas Edition with Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RegEx Template Help: Pruning/Deleting Duplicate Newlines
Hello,
I'm using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 2000 SP3 Build 2195.
I'm trying to make a regex template to get rid of duplicate newlines.
So far, this is what I have (and I know it's very wrong):
=[ RemoveDupNewlines ]=
%QUOTES='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m)%-
((\n){2})%-
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%text%SUBPATT=1'
Can anyone help me out? I may not even be close. Right now, it's not
doing anything.
Thank you!
-MikeD
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RegEx Template Help: Pruning/Deleting Duplicate Newlines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Dillinger [MD] wrote:'
MD I'm trying to make a regex template to get rid of duplicate newlines.
MD So far, this is what I have (and I know it's very wrong):
MD =[ RemoveDupNewlines ]=
MD %QUOTES='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m)%-
MD ((\n){2})%-
MD %REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%text%SUBPATT=1'
MD Can anyone help me out? I may not even be close. Right now, it's not
MD doing anything.
You should take this question to TBTECH. TBTECH was created to
discuss these technical issues and also, the regex experts are
subscribed there and may not be subscribed to TBUDL.
- --
-=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator}
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2rc1 (Win32)
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE+VCvYV8nrYCsHF+IRAqGzAJ9wftyRTuOsxw1c1gTGxSYTx9uWpgCfe1Uo
S5Y6XzmTzD7m/qUwTCyDRLc=
=Y0bJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrapping of paragraphs in replies to HTML email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, @20-Feb-2003, 09:50 +1030 (23:20 UK time) David McIver [DM] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: DMI have one question on the QT macro for wrapping HTML DMmessages. After the quoted message has been formatted, there DMis normally around 6 blank lines. For example the template: ... snip DM... Has anyone modified (or can suggest how to modify) the DM'wq' QT macro so that trailing blank lines are not reproduced DMin the quoted text? Every line of macro has a payload of a blank line unless it ends with a %- macro. Is that a clue? That includes and %qinclude=blah lines too. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+VDMTOeQkq5KdzaARAuQJAKDg0guVo/wB/WEetLzNnSp/ud5rcACgzYi/ uQK4tV/Pi3oVYriIC602M+Q= =Epam -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and PC protection
Hi Miles, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 3:54:59 PM, you wrote: MJ FIREWALL MJ #1 choice Agnitum Outpost (www.agnitum.com) MJ #2 choice Norton Firewall MJ #3 choice Tiny Firewall MJ ANTIVIRUS MJ #1 choice Norton AV MJ #2 choice AGV MJ #3 choice F-Prot -- Best regards, Mike Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Hello Thomas, Anyway, let's say there is a message and you delete from server. TB still needs to download the headers first, in order to compare them with your kill file. That's why you first see downloading header. Then, let's say the message fits your kill conditions as per .txt file. The message will be deleted on the server - and not be downloaded. So 0 messages received will still be right. Surely, I just desable the selected download filter, beacause I see that it kills e-mail that sould not be, for exemple a mail sent from my second account is killed, and when I desactive the filter, the same email can pass, and yet my e-mail address is jot in the spammer list .txt, so I have the impression the selected download is not very trustworthy ! I prefer for the moment deal with an incoming filter with keywords that send suspicious mail in a spam folder taht i can sometim esverify before deleting :-) Thanks Christophe Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Retrieving mail problrem ?
Yeah, it is a strange problem. I still think you should use the dispatcher to see what the email is and whether it's spam or what. If nothing else, it might give us a direction to look in for the problem. Take care with using my txt file and the selected download filter ! I just desable it, beacause I see that it kills e-mail that sould not be, for exemple a mail sent from my second account is killed, and when I desactive the filter, the same email can pass, and yet my e-mail address is jot in the spammer list .txt, so I have the impression the selected download is not very trustworthy ! I prefer for the moment deal with an incoming filter with keywords that send suspicious mail in a spam folder taht i can sometimes verify before deleting :-) -- Best regards, Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
PC-cillin vs the Bat
2/19/03 11:13 PM Hello TBUDL, I experiencing some difficulties with the Bat v1.62 and PC-cillin '03. Every time PC-cillin is active and I attempt to use the Bat...I experience the Bat slowing down and locking up. Any suggestions? -- Best regards, MS Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
