Re: Re[2]: multiple e-mail account with same name
Hello achdut. --On 16 June 2005 03:29 -0500 you wrote about Re[2]: multiple e-mail account with same name: > Your suggestion won't work because there will be an overlap period of > a month or two where both addresses will be live. Ah, you omitted that little detail. Not too sure how your account is set up anyway, I replied to your message and it ended up being addressed to myself at tbudl? -- Tony. M pgpciDezzqDUX.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: multiple e-mail account with same name
Hello achdut. --On 16 June 2005 02:15 -0500 you wrote about multiple e-mail account with same name: > Hi. I would appreciate it if someone could help me to figure out how > to transition my e-mail setup from an ISP to a private domain. > When I attempt to set up a "new account" the prompt tells me that any > name I use must be different from one that is already being used. Can't you just edit your existing POP/SMTP server details and change them to your new private domain servers details. That way your existing account complete with existing folders will still be used only pointing to your new domain. You may still have to edit the odd filter or two so that they don't filter on your old address. -- Tony. M pgpVOMNbzhNiq.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please, need help threading correctly...
Hello Dwight, A reminder of what Dwight A Corrin on TBUDL typed on: 13 June 2005 at 16:10:07 GMT -0500 > two of the great mysteries of the 20th century on this continent Oh them. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.26 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpyCzNUL7T5o.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please, need help threading correctly...
--On Monday, June 13, 2005 21:41:59 +0100 MFPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Who? I was going to say that as well! -- Tony. LM Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filtering for TBUDL
Hello Darrin, A reminder of what Darrin on TBUDL typed on: 13 June 2005 at 07:33:26 GMT -0700 > Thanks. Got the filter working correctly now. :) Welcome and good in that order. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.26 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpCC7sS8ExoS.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filtering for TBUDL
Hello Darrin, A reminder of what Darrin on TBUDL typed on: 13 June 2005 at 06:36:50 GMT -0700 > I see in the email that was sent when I subscribe how to filter > tbudl email to a specific folder. This filter moves TBUDL mail from INBOX to TBUDL folder. Cut it from here and paste it into your Sorting Office Filters then adjust the path in the Actions tab. TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [B61E1472.01C569CE.30F8F4E1.062D0E67] Name: TBUDL Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MoveMessage folder \5C\5CFastmail\5CInbox\5CTBUDL IsContinue Ignore endFilter -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.26 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpfax5NTM3y7.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25
Hello Tim. --On 07 June 2005 21:38 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25: > Well that's a bit strong. I only asked. Whatever. No I wasn't trying to be a bit strong, I was trying to save you from another trouting. Did you read below my signature line? -- Tony. M pgpvFTFsadbGh.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mod: Top posting (was: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25)
--On Tuesday, June 07, 2005 15:21:39 -0500 Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oh, good! Mary, not only do you hijack subjects, now you managed to hijack someone's Trout. :) -- Tony. LM Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25
Hello Tim, A reminder of what Tim Bicknelle on TBUDL typed on: 07 June 2005 at 10:22:20 GMT +0100 > Hi Tony, Because no body know what the hell your talking about that's why and throws the whole thing out of context. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.26 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org Why isn't top posting allowed on this list? pgpWJq9uYQDl1.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wanadoo problems (again!)
Hello Richard, A reminder of what Richard Wakeford on TBUDL typed on: 06 June 2005 at 21:46:24 GMT +0200 > Hmm. Wonder if there's a slight incompatibility between NTL and Wanadoo > then? Try sending to me if you like, see if it works. tony.boom at ntlworld.com -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpc4cXn7LoLA.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wanadoo problems (again!)
Hello Richard, A reminder of what Richard Wakeford on TBUDL typed on: 06 June 2005 at 20:31:48 GMT +0200 > I've had trouble with them all. Maybe it's an incompatibility between > Wanadoo and NTL? Not too long ago there was a massive spam outbreak from Wanadoo addresses and NTL blacklisted them. I'm pretty sure I mentioned it on here at the time. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgp5PI53OVWdi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25
Hello Tim, A reminder of what Tim Bicknelle on TBUDL typed on: 06 June 2005 at 18:54:54 GMT +0100 > Then installed the new version thebat_pro_3-5-25.msi and then (during the > install) restored my > backup. When you reinstalled did you answer yes to OTFE? Don't think you even had that option as you need to delete the RIT registry entries as well, not just delete the folder. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpxoVTO5nvPt.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wanadoo problems (again!)
Hello Jonathan, A reminder of what Jonathan Angliss on TBUDL typed on: 06 June 2005 at 11:33:27 GMT -0500 > 1) ntlworld.com need some help running mail servers and their drives > are full on the incoming smtp service. It won't be that one. > 2) the recipient you are sending mail to has filled up their > allocated space. That will be the probable cause. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpII90DVvpI2.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Slow spelling correction
Hello Paul, A reminder of what Paul Jansen on TBUDL typed on: 06 June 2005 at 10:33:47 GMT +0100 > I am finding that when I right click on an incorrectly spelt word it > takes up to 5 seconds for the list of suggested words to appear. Is > there anything I can do about this? There are three choices for the spell checker, fast, medium and slow. The more accurate you want it, the slower it is. See what option you have checked. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpythfJSXh1C.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: Background color and Key Assignments
Hello Vili. --On 03 June 2005 22:43 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: Background color and Key Assignments: > NOW I see yor problem. I see your problem as well, your clock is about 24 hours slow. Unless you saved all yesterdays messages up and are sending them today? I sort by time/date stamp and everything you sent today has yesterdays date on. -- Tony. M pgp3TawDI1kBX.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Thomas. --On 05 June 2005 01:34 +0700 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > It does. :-) Super duper thanks. -- Tony. M pgpFolKo49g2J.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Mary. --On 04 June 2005 13:32 -0500 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > You did and it is! Looking beautiful as ever!! Thanks a mil from > Trill!! Unfortunately I can't see them this end. None of the smileys work here either but that's no great loss :) -- Tony. M pgp6JNRR8fmco.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Mary. --On 04 June 2005 13:19 -0500 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > Looking forward to seeing your face in my header pane soon. :) Should be there now if I followed Thomas' directions right? -- Tony. M pgpSYLuDNHsH9.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Thomas. --On 05 June 2005 01:10 +0700 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > Not Mary, but I happen to be online. Your rogue-header used to be: OK, thank you Thomas, lets see if this works? -- Tony. M pgptTp7LCc74v.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Mary. --On 04 June 2005 08:45 -0500 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > It's there! But he can't utilize it. Mary, can you refresh my memory as to exactly what header to use please and what the name of my rogue photo is. I'll try to implement it again. Thanks. -- Tony. M pgppVASZPIF7x.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bat fails to start
Hello Duncan. --On 04 June 2005 16:48 +0100 you wrote about Bat fails to start: > Any ideas/suggestions? Yes, tell her to get her own bloody computer and stop messing your's up :) -- Tony. M pgppMChiRjp5M.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Mary. --On 04 June 2005 09:59 -0500 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: >> Apparently, the developers are close to having as part of The Bat! the >> best IMAP functionality available anywhere on the market now, > Maybe not so much joking as wishful thinking? Maybe if your name was Jeanie and not Mary I might just believe that :) -- Tony. M pgpP0ejsSaVjg.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Mary. --On 04 June 2005 08:45 -0500 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > Apparently, the developers are close to having as part of The Bat! the > best IMAP functionality available anywhere on the market now, The best POP client Mary, they already have *the* best POP client but not IMAP. The Bat! isn't even remotely close to being one tenth of a percent as good as Mulberry is when it comes to IMAP. And I can't see it even getting close to being in the same league for many years. There's far too many other things they have fix first. -- Tony. M pgpj9YNiAenV2.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Jeff. --On 04 June 2005 14:33 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > In that case you should put your picture in the rogues gallery so we > can see what our Saviour looks like :-) My picture has been in the gallery for the past 4 years, it was one of the first half dozen in there! -- Tony. M pgpCUbhlgLXpf.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Thomas. --On 04 June 2005 18:39 +0700 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > Thanks for your efforts, it's really appreciated. Anything for you Thommy, I know how sensitive you are :) I didn't really do it for you anyway, I did for the good of Mankind in general :) -- Tony. M pgp4eN576yWS4.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello MAU. --On 03 June 2005 19:26 +0200 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > Perfect Tony. All mids in Refetences are between <>. See: Thank God for that! I just opened a Fastmail IMAP account, and paid for it so if it still produced threading problems I don't know what it would be... But it don't so it just proves it WAS 1&1.co.uk IMAP server. This one seems one hell of a lot faster as well, might try it with TB when I get it all set up. Thanks Mig. -- Tony. M pgpusp6WmhlLl.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?
Hello Mary. --On 03 June 2005 11:50 -0500 you wrote about Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?: > But your sig info says that you are running 3.5.25, Sorry to hijack but can anyone tell me if this threads OK please? -- Tony. M pgpYRXd6PIi0V.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie. - --On 24 May 2005 11:31 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > PGP9 was assimilated. ;) No problem for The Caribbean English Alliance. Now where's that big bad black Jedi geezer with the funny torch, we'll sort him out next :) Did you get the file I sent by the way? - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNap9anuJ+T+uXWEQLOGwCgnKqpewCcg3UvqSzcMWlt1YXiKw0AoIMY ZjiSXoeauqJcglZ3BtSE8F3R =UFWs -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello danger. - --On 24 May 2005 12:20 -0400 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Works fine here too back at you PGP9 *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION *** *** Status: Good Signature *** Signer: danger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (0x29E74338) *** Signed: 24/05/2005 17:20:46 *** Verified: 24/05/2005 17:40:37 *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNZKtanuJ+T+uXWEQK75ACffyYO5p+3Ql69MxQm1OmIa3ITJ8UAoKdf 51PAtYSpEQ8pcaaaJmHF2nb3 =Brod -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark. - --On 24 May 2005 18:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > I get "OK PGP verified" for this one... Clear signed, not MIME. - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNVftanuJ+T+uXWEQJIZwCgz7FQIlUJWmo7Mb5i6si2ZHDvPaQAoLF5 ZLzmqLW+s7kWJqsxErf0YBBi =1nWf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof. - --On 24 May 2005 17:59 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Verifies ok. It's clear signed though, not MIME, not ideal but the only way I can get a verification on these lists. - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNVV9anuJ+T+uXWEQKqyQCcCBirOKP8hgh3nJmPrnM7FC4nugQAnRbV K4hTjFRDmLplKzmCUq8p31L0 =3MiV -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark. - --On 24 May 2005 17:37 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > I haven't bought anything on the internet yet since I found out my visa > card had been charged for 230 $ for an online casino with address in > London. :-( Ooops. I use mine all the time. - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNM49anuJ+T+uXWEQJSIACguo4wuLtyxA+a8FM4ySAt6jhgpAoAoJA0 sP3xmZX+ezSiNCsw7uur8BOM =mxGl -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark. - --On 24 May 2005 17:35 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > I got a "bad signature" for this one... They should all be bad on TBUDL and TBBETA. They don't even register as digital signatures here, even though I signed them. I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the dutaint lists. Try this one? - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNMlNanuJ+T+uXWEQL/NQCg3X3be1BKLcfhKULD4jt0iNitmNEAoNyO mdGz/4VwhF7LB+vjXuwH73Fc =EW1E -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, A reminder of what Tony Boom on TBUDL typed on: 24 May 2005 at 16:08:56 GMT +0200 > I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures > verify on here at all, I doubt they will, I've just fired up TB! and none of them do, not even here. Is it usual to have to wait 30-45 seconds for a message to appear in an IMAP folder with TB!? -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Mark. --On 24 May 2005 15:33 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Besides that, is it (not the both of you, but PGP9) worth upgrading? That's for you to decide. I got fed up with all the agro I was getting with trial versions or free Gnu versions, it was a confidence thing, so in an attempt to get some stability from PGP I fully bought and paid for PGP9 Desktop complete with PGP disk or virtual disk as it now it. I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures verify on here at all, but I'm getting there. I personally am glad I bought it so I'd say yes it is worth it. There are a few things I don't like, I prefer pre v9 tray right click menu, with v9 you have to open the whole program to get to PGPkeys and verifying in TB! opens the whole program interface as well. Apart from that I like it. -- Tony. M. pgp74pFSZ9Vb2.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie. --On 23 May 2005 18:06 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: >> Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is >> not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. > > I had initially had it working. This was when I had previously had PGP8 > installed, and then ran the PGP9 installation without first uninstalling > PGP8. Same problem, I just tried it. The Bat! also looks for a txt file rather than an xml file. PGP9 now works fine with TB! I see what you mean Allie about the whole PGP program popping up just to verify a message. To get PGP9 working with TB! you need to create a text file called PGPprefs.txt In that file needs to be the path to your PGP keyring in this format, each line needs to be on one whole line: PublicKeyringFile="C:\Documents and Settings\Tony\My Documents\PGP\pubring.pkr" PrivateKeyringFile="C:\Documents and Settings\Tony\My Documents\PGP\secring.skr" Edit the paths to your own name obviously. Then save that file to Docs and Settings\Username\Application data\PGP corporation\PGP\PGPprefs.txt RIT Labs need to update the pgp.dll to look for an xml pref file as well as a txt pref file. God Allie we're good 'aint we :) -- Tony. M. pgppygiR0WvWu.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin. --On 24 May 2005 08:58 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > ..and a reset button. ;-) A "Shut your gob" button would be nice too :) -- Tony. M. pgpiIuqWn4sxK.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Gerard. --On 23 May 2005 21:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > I don know but you are missing a lot of the fun things ;-) Shhh, can't stop, kids are all in bed asleep. Must get on... If you'll excuse the pun :) And stop baiting me, I've already been trouted twice. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Leif. --On 23 May 2005 12:44 -0600 you wrote about OT: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Please don't feel singled out Tony. You just got the hump 'cos I get my leg over more than you :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 20:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > No threading at all. After this post I promise my threading will be OK. > > Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of > IMAP. With all those different (buggy) server types that need special > care by one or the other client, its a no-no for me. :-) Defeatist :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel. --On 23 May 2005 20:03 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question. > I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas > TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does everything on > its own, which doesn't fit 100% into IMAP specification. > > Correct? ;-) That is how it was explained to me by a very proficient IMAP guru. No, he's not on this list :) But then again your on the list he's on so you probably read his explanation as well. In fact your explanation is so right I had to quote it all for Alex' sake. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin. --On 23 May 2005 18:33 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Also, will you try Mulberry with 1&1? If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same problems. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel. --On 23 May 2005 20:00 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at > all. Therefore it can't be threading in any way. Don't you start, I thought you was on my side :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Mark. --On 23 May 2005 19:38 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: TB> don't do sex much either. > Oh-Oh must be the lying that does it! :-) OK, you got me. But only 4 or 5 times a week, nothing like when I was younger. I do have the odd glass of red wine or 3 every night as well... But I don't go down the Pub, honest! -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 19:07 +0200 you wrote about Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that > the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) Why don't people listen? He uses Mulberry yes, he doesn't however use 1and1. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Thomas. --On 23 May 2005 14:24 -0300 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support > for PGP 9 in the future? That's one for the developers. Oh look, it threads :) -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 19:07 +0200 you wrote about Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that > the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) No, why would I need to do that? Your the one who's not playing the same game as me. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 19:06 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a > client instead... This one will thread OK as well, not with TB! as a client. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel. --On 23 May 2005 19:04 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Threading seems okay. Your not listening to me are you? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply "somewhere" using > the IMAP account I just created. I'm a 1&1 customer just like Tony, and I > just created an IMAP account in TB to access my mails & see if they thread > or not, as I still don't see how an *incoming* mail server like IMAP would > affect *outgoing* mails that are sent via SMTP, no matter if its POP or > IMAP. It only happens with Mulberry, not The Bat for reasons discussed at length last week. And it's nothing to do with SMTP, it's when you reply to a post that's stored on your IMAP server. Forget the SMTP side of it, that has nothing to do with it. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > I'm a 1&1 customer just like Tony, and I just created an IMAP account in > TB to access my mails & see if they thread or not Like I said, they will. The Bat! doesn't yet handle IMAP the way it should but that's not the point. Mulberry handle IMAP to the very letter of any RFC law and that's why it's happening, it's not getting the correct response from the server. Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie. --On 23 May 2005 11:12 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it > worked. I did nothing else. Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law abiding, looking after under privileged children, don't do drugs, don't go to pubs, don't do sex much either. I must have been really bad in a previous life! -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin. --On 23 May 2005 17:19 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Does this explain why your message ID is always something like No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Thomas. --On 23 May 2005 12:55 -0300 you wrote about PGP 9 ans TheBat!: > Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is > not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Anonymous emails?
Hello Dick. --On 22 May 2005 16:50 +0200 you wrote about Anonymous emails?: > I want to be totally invisible and untraceable. Sounds a bit sus' to me. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Theory test.
Hello Costas. --On 22 May 2005 10:40 +0300 you wrote about Re: Theory test.: > This is what I get: Thank you. My PGP situation has changed big time since I sent that but we won't go into that now, I've had enough pf PGP for one lifetime :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: FastMail IMAP: How to "really" delete messages?
Hello Ralph. --On 21 May 2005 22:21 +0200 you wrote about Re: FastMail IMAP: How to "really" delete messages?: > How do i do this? Webinterface of FastMail or TB!? Highlight the folder in the folder tree with all the deleted messages and press CTRL+C or set it up in your preferences to purge and compress when you change folders or shut down. In The Bat! not the web interface. -- Tony. PGP Key www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Theory test.
Hello Peter. --On 20 May 2005 19:26 +0200 you wrote about Re: Theory test.: > This is from TBUDL. I'll see to TBOT too. Thank you, I just need to find out how to get keys from a server using the DOS prompt. If I use PGP 8 it finds the key fine. If I use the same server in DOS it says it can't find it. The commands I use are: gpg --search-keys --keyserver ldap://europe.keys.pgp.com:1137 0x242864B9 Or: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver ldap://europe.keys.pgp.com:1137 0x242864B -- Tony. M. pgp80U6lpRk5Y.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Theory test.
Hello Roelof. --On 20 May 2005 19:37 +0200 you wrote about Re: Theory test.: > Validates ok. So why such a big difference in validation between PGP 8 and GnuPG 1.4.1 using the same key? I need to lay down in a dark room for a while I think. -- Tony. M. pgpntO6h7D2Cj.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Theory test.
Hello Manuel. --On 20 May 2005 18:35 +0200 you wrote about Re: Theory test.: > You got, Tony. Theory isn't bad, but not perfect. See: Are you saying my signature is OK on TBUDL? It still doesn't even register here as a signature. -- Tony. M. pgpuiKAWAZisF.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Theory test.
Hello Tony. --On 20 May 2005 17:30 +0100 you wrote about Theory test.: > If my theory proves correct this should validate on TBUDL but not TBOT OK, I was wrong. TBOT still works OK, TBUDL don't and that's with GnuPG. -- Tony. M. pgpomXGSozF2L.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Theory test.
Just testing a theory. Would appreciate a PGP verification report from as many people as possible. If my theory proves correct this should validate on TBUDL but not TBOT -- Tony. M. pgpuxilJL7A1P.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Norton Antivirus 2005 and connection centre startup problem.
Hello David. --On 19 May 2005 12:56 +0100 you wrote about Norton Antivirus 2005 and connection centre startup problem.: > I've an odd problem with running Don't tell me, your knees knock together, your toes turn in and it chafes the tops of your legs? -- Tony. M. pgp7zetDQaat1.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 19 May 2005 13:04 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam filters: > Until I > joined this group (and it will settle down) I had usually 1 or 2 spams > and maybe 1 false report out of 500 genuine spams. I might give that a go I think. Am I right in thinking I can use it for an NTL account and then forward all that to my boomclan account? It's my NTL account I get most spam in, dozens and dozens of them. That's why I don't use it anymore. I did try forgetting about it and leaving the spam to pile up, but as soon as it gets full I get one message from NTL for every spam message I get telling me it's full and that's even more annoying than the spam. -- Tony. M. pgpFO5HlJY0GX.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Marck. --On 19 May 2005 13:02 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters: > pssst - wrong person! I was replying to myself, correcting my faulty > research. It is Steve Lee who uses the Spamcop mail filtering, not me! > So ... sorry ... your mistake it remains ;-) Oooops, sorry Steve! :) > I was replying to myself, Allie, put your white coat on, your needed :) -- Tony. M. pgpvrkowZnYpe.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Marck. --On 19 May 2005 11:57 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters: > No Marck - it was Tony's mistake. Yes, sorry my mistake. > But I can't find where they define their whitelisting stuff. How odd, you gave the impression you used it all the time for allowing certain addresses through that were wrongly classified as spam? Isn't that why you wanted a [TAG] in the subject line, to make it easier for you to enter those addresses into your spamcop whitelist? > So I'm backing down from this convo. Not my mistake after all then :) -- Tony. M. pgpc2vAgzilFO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Marck. --On 19 May 2005 11:49 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters: > Spamcop do filter spam for you, but only if you use a spamcop.net > email address, which you are not doing, so it's not that. I quite like the idea of that for 16 quid a year, what do you think? -- Tony. M. pgpM8P0sxR9NL.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proposal for spam filters
Hello St. --On 19 May 2005 12:26 +0200 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters: > That feature is a big problem, and I can't believe it is still in there! It's a feature I never use. You don't need Mailwasher to bounce mail though, The Bat is more than capable of doing that on it's own with a simple QT. -- Tony. M. pgpoFLmmgOik0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 19 May 2005 11:27 +0100 you wrote about Re[4]: Proposal for spam filters: > It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference. No difference at all! Quoting direct from spamcop.net: > SpamCop is the premier service for reporting spam. You still didn't say what software you use for initially trapping spam? I can't find "Spamcop" software anywhere. Could you please tell me where to download it from? I've just been allover spamcop.net and can't find any software to download, I am thinking of getting a spamcop email address though, that looks quite impressive for Â16 a year. What spammer is going to deliberately spam a spamcop address :) -- Tony. M. pgpaCIQPEjENv.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 18 May 2005 22:21 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam filters: > I use Spamcop and can only whitelist senders not receivers and the > sender is yourself not "the bat". I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the "Download Trial" link and it took me to the Mailwasher Pro download page. Now from what I can gather Spamcop is not a software program, it's a company or service where you report spam to. I use it myself with Mailwasher Pro and if I click the report box for any spam I get that they don't already know about it's Spamcop that it's reported to. If it was a spam filtering program I doubt they'd direct people to a competitors download page. Correct me if I'm wrong but Spamcop is not Spam trapping software, it's just a place to report it to? See attached for a complete description as to exactly what Spamcop is. If so, what actual software do you use to trap spam in the first place? Like I said I use Spamcop myself, I just didn't know it. Mailwasher Pro does such a good job I don't even know it's there half the time. -- Tony. M. pgpOBg0J4pwFn.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Alexander. --On 18 May 2005 23:30 +0200 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters: > Well, the "Sender" of the list messages, according to the headers I'm > seeing, is "Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]", while the "From" > field has the address of the message author. Exactly what I said, add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the white list if that's the sender. -- Tony. M. pgpokOpDNScsP.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 18 May 2005 22:21 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam filters: > I use Spamcop and can only whitelist senders not receivers and the > sender is yourself not "the bat". In that case may I suggest http://www.firetrust.com/ -- Tony. M. pgpyNHfY2S1CE.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 18 May 2005 13:53 +0100 you wrote about Re[4]: Proposal for spam filters: > I get a number from users of this mailing list. Would it not be better for you to find out why they are being falsely classified as spam rather than to expect them to do it for you? Like I said before, spam very, very rarely gets to these lists so why not just add the complete domain @thebat.dutaint.com to your whitelist? That way no one will be falsely classified and *if* any true spam gets through it's just a matter of blacklisting it. Blacklisting 1 or 2 spam every 2 or 3 years must be easier than expecting dozens of individuals to change their habits of a lifetime overnight? -- Tony. M. pgpgJW5yE65fn.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 18 May 2005 13:50 +0100 you wrote about Re[4]: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam filters: > Ineterestingly enough this very thread has [TBUDL] at the beginning of the > subject field. Only because some poor gullible soul took you too seriously :) I used to belong to a list that had [ACD] prefixed to every subject line and I hated it, I think it looks messy as does Re(2), Re:Re(4) etc. No offense meant of course. %SINGLERE in your template will cure that. I personally have only ever seen two, three at most spam sent to these lists and they were by pure accident so I don't even run my bat lists account through Mailwasher Pro. -- Tony. M. pgpFeaYf1ceJs.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Special folders
Hello Martin. --On 18 May 2005 11:20 +0100 you wrote about Special folders: > Is there a special folder for virus infected files? $ANTIBIOTIC$ ? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam filters
Hello Steve. --On 18 May 2005 10:43 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam filters: > That is how Yahoo Groups works and it is very effective. TBOT is a Yahoo group list and I've never seen anything like extra subject tags in any subject line? Just the standard subject as typed. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam filters
Hello Roman. --On 17 May 2005 21:26 -0400 you wrote about Re: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam filters: > Neat. Can you post it somewhere? With it's source maybe? Gordon Bennett. Everyone's going to be using it now. Subject lines full of quirky little anecdotes enclosed in square brackets. I'm with Wham on this one, there are enough headers to filter on. And if it ain't spam it shouldn't get classified as such. Truth is only one in a million posts to any of these bat lists, including the Yahoo group is spam. And even then it's normally a genuine mistake on a list members part so why the need to filter for spam at all? In any case, I'm pretty sure Steve wasn't being 100% serious... Was you Steve? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: address book gone?
Hello Clive. --On 17 May 2005 07:07 +0100 you wrote about Re: address book gone?: > Tony has posted a number of messages testing his IMAP accounts in TBBETA > using Mulberry that have failed to thread properly while other people > using the prog have not had problems. Lot's of people get cascading AV's when using The Bat! I myself and most others do not so that's that theory gone. I don't know what to try. I've tried completely uninstalling, I've tried earlier non beta versions and I still can't get it to work. I'm waiting to see what Mulberry support has to say about it. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: address book gone?
Hello Clive. --On 16 May 2005 22:25 +0100 you wrote about Re: address book gone?: > As is your threading (re our exchange in TBBETA). Weird. So are you saying in TBUDL my threading is OK and all to cock just in TBBETA? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: Help! I lost my accounts
--On 16 May 2005 19:53 +0100 Martin Webster on tbudl wrote about... Re[2]: Help! I lost my accounts: You should try IMAP! >:-) If I wasn't having so many problems I'd second that :) -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: address book gone?
--On 16 May 2005 19:59 +0200 Jurgen Haug wrote about... address book gone?: Did that happen only to me, or is the 'standard procedure'? My address books are fine. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! v3.5 Final fails to install...
--On 14 May 2005 23:49 +0200 AJ Blisten wrote about... The Bat! v3.5 Final fails to install...: It seems like The Bat setup file (thebat_professional.smi) are searching for a file to start the uninstall process of the old version. And when the setup file doesn't find the file it obviously need to start that process the whole installation process stops! I have never installed The Bat on this machine. Most people on this list know how I make backups and also how I transfer from one PC to another. I just backed up registry entries, copied the whole TB folder from one machine to another and run the reg file. The Bat doesn't appear in my add/remove list and the latest msi file installed without a hitch. It will show up in the list now as I run the installer but I personally don't think that's your problem. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat crashed and now the folder with my mail folder is not
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBUDL typed on: 08 April 2005 at 10:16:00 GMT +0200 zzc> I don't know this command at all. Is this available in the DOS mode in zzc> WinXP-Home? And does the fixmbr works on JUST one particular drive at zzc> a time? Or the root of the physical disk? I just want to make sure zzc> that if fixmbr does work, that it doesn't mess up my other partitions. It is a dos command and you need to boot direct into dos. It will fix a trashed boot block on your main bootable drive ie c:\. You did ask about it in your original post but I doubt it'll help fix your L partition. It "shouldn't" hurt anything if you try it but don't take my word for it. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.9.13 Return :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat crashed and now the folder with my mail folder is not accessable
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBUDL typed on: 08 April 2005 at 07:24:34 GMT +0200 zzc> I vaguely remember that there is a DOS command(?) that would fix the zzc> boot sector -- something with a switch of MBR Would that help? fixmbr -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.9.13 Return :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBUDL typed on: 26 February 2005 at 16:06:34 GMT +0100 TF> even though the filtering (and status "importing messages" TF> is a couple of seconds slow. No problem I noticed that, the connection centre flashes up for a split second then I can sit and watch the unread message numbers clock up next to the folders. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!
Hello Alexander, A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz on TBUDL typed on: 26 February 2005 at 09:17:09 GMT +0100 ASK> So I'd say - coincidence. Me too. I have my Bat running on the same PC as my mail server. The whole process of collecting and sending is all but instantaneous with no corruptions. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need NOD32 plug-in source
Hello M., A reminder of what M. K. ZBOROWSKI on TBUDL typed on: 25 February 2005 at 12:08:16 GMT +0100 MKZ> Every time I was trying to send it I was MKZ> getting smth like that (can't remember exactly) "antivirus software MKZ> reported problem: the object can not be checked". Have to NOD32 installed or just the pluggin? -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need NOD32 plug-in source
Hello M., A reminder of what M. K. ZBOROWSKI on TBUDL typed on: 25 February 2005 at 11:38:59 GMT +0100 MKZ> and nothing changed for me, I still do get the same error But he asked which error? -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need NOD32 plug-in source
Hello Marek, A reminder of what Marek Mikus on TBUDL typed on: 25 February 2005 at 10:17:26 GMT +0100 MM> which error? I have sent it to more than 50 testers and they are using MM> it daily with no problem. I've been using it and it works perfectly with no problems at all. Like I said earlier, I forgot it was there. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need NOD32 plug-in source
Hello M., A reminder of what M. K. ZBOROWSKI on TBUDL typed on: 25 February 2005 at 10:11:21 GMT +0100 MKZ> Yes it does work with TB! 3.x, but only until you do not try to send MKZ> any kind of attachment, because this causes an error. I've been using the NOD32 pluggin for about a year now and I forgot it was there. No errors, no problems at all with attachments. Like I say, it works so well I forgot it was there until you mentioned it. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: More observation on Bayesit!
Hello Barry, A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on: 21 February 2005 at 12:30:15 GMT +0100 B> You'll have to drop me a line Ron, Gmane hides your identity very well! Why not post it to this list, that way everyone who uses Bayesit can try it and you won't have to send it a dozen times. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 21/02/2005 at 12:19 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: More observation on Bayesit!
Hello Barry, A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on: 21 February 2005 at 10:05:26 GMT +0100 B> If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the B> file over. Yes please Barry. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 21/02/2005 at 09:08 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: the bat! "on the fly encryption" and tokens
Hello Claude, A reminder of what Claude Renaud on TBUDL typed on: 20 February 2005 at 22:02:14 GMT +0100 CR> How can we activate OTFE ? CR> Does the authentication based on token is planned ? You'll need to delete all the RIT registry entries and completely reinstall TB from fresh where you will get the option for OTFE with whatever token type you want. Best thing is backup everything first, delete reg entries, install TB and then restore from the backup... It's the ONLY way as yet to change from non encrypted to encrypted and back again. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 20/02/2005 at 21:30 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Using the bat! and the Time and Chaos software ...
Hello Darrin, A reminder of what Darrin Rich on TBUDL typed on: 17 February 2005 at 02:11:07 GMT +0100 DR> Not to knock down TB, but have you tried the email software by Time & DR> Choas? Its called ExpressPlus and suppose to work perfectly with the DR> pim software. I bought the whole T&C bundle including Express Plus, it's a complete load of rubbish and is just about as basic and non functional as email software gets. The version I have is 1.0.6.9 so if later versions are any better I don't know. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 18/02/2005 at 13:07 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Why am I finding BayesIt so difficult?
Hello David, A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBUDL typed on: 17 February 2005 at 15:32:23 GMT +0100 DC> I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either. Doesn't seem to DC> do a thing. I'm trying out Bayes Filter ATM though. It used to work here but for some reason it doesn't work at all now despite the fact it has in excess of 10,000 mail to work with. It never has worked properly without an exceptional amount of effort. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 17/02/2005 at 17:38 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bat Archives
Hello capocasa, A reminder of what capocasa on TBUDL typed on: 15 February 2005 at 20:00:13 GMT +0100 c> When I go to this address c> http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/ c> to search for a subject the search button doesn't work. Seems to c> defeat the purpose. Am I missing something? I knew there had to be a reason why I don't bother with the archives :) -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 15/02/2005 at 19:04 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Add Begin PGP signature
Hello The, A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBUDL typed on: 14 February 2005 at 18:54:38 GMT +0100 TFC> I send myself an email to my 2nd account and I TFC> don't see the Begin blabla stuff That's because your Mime signing it. Try turning PGP MIME off. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 14/02/2005 at 17:59 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt pgpNGr9gZScxo.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?
Hello Greg, A reminder of what Greg Strong on TBOT typed on: Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:45:40 GMT +0100 GS> I've seen this argument on TB lists for years. It seems to be an GS> ideological issue / opinion. Why can't you provide options and keep GS> everybody happy? Exactly. Not having the option limits the user base, having the option would open it up to an even wider user base even it most people wouldn't use it. -- Tony. The Bat! 3.0.2.10 Registered Linux user #316959 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBOT typed on: Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:29:44 GMT +0100 TF> TB's user demography will probably have a higher percentage of TF> computer savvy users than most other mailers, yet it nannies the users TF> more. Why is that? I can't stress enough how much I agree with you. If TB! is to compete with other mailers, especially the ones about today then it should have the same abilities. I've played with most of them and the good ones all have the option to refuse or accept image display. What they don't have is all the rest of TB's powers, especially filtering and templates. Like Thomas said, the users on this list are the elite of email users, maybe a version of TB! just for us with a secret, non documented option for true full blown html ability... Just for us, to reward us for years of loyalty in the face of beta testing adversity :) -- Tony. The Bat! 3.0.2.10 Registered Linux user #316959 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBOT typed on: Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:17:35 GMT +0100 TF> But then, I still fail to see why "sexually implicit" movies are so TF> heavily regulated (how can they hurt anyone?), like PG18, while TF> violent movies are often rated only PG12. I agree with you here Tommy. I don't believe it should be rammed down their throats but I'd rather them learn to make love not war to quote an old phrase. TF> I'm impressed about your kids. Depending on how old they are, My Son is 19 and he always manages to find better site than I do :)_ -- Tony. The Bat! 3.0.2.10 Registered Linux user #316959 :gentoo: www.gentoo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
