Re: [Tex-music] Staff crossed beams

[Luigi Cataldi]

I believe this works. You must end the group with "]" and not with "]j". 
It is also not necessary to force the beam direction with "[ju".


Luigi

=

2    1   3 4 3 4  0 -5
1 1 20  .08

bt
./
rb4d [j a8 ] rb4 | rb8 [j a ] rb4d [j b8 ] /
[ f8 d f ]j rb [j g e ] | [ f8 ]j rb [j a8 f8 d ]j rb   //
a44d a1 d b8 c  d4d d1 a b8 f  /



Il 27/08/22 10:01, a...@telenet.be ha scritto:

In this example, in the upper staff, the lower voice get a double beam equal
to the upper voice. I am not able to solve this.

Was this already mentioned before?

Thanks for helping

Andre
===
 21   3 4 3 4  0 -5
1 1 20  .08

bt

./
rb4d [j a8 ]j rb4 | rb8 [j a ]j rb4d [j b8 ] /
[ f8 d f ]j rb [ju g8 e ]  [ f ]j rb [j a f d ]j rb   //
a44d a1 d b8 c  d4d d1 a b8 f  /


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Dirk Laurie

[Luigi Cataldi]

I'm really saddened by this news. I constantly use mtx, which for me has 
always been a really useful program and for which I have also written a 
guide in Italian that should still be on WIMA.


I am not a programmer, but it seems necessary that the program continues 
to be available.


Last but non least. Is there anything we can do to celebrate his memory 
on WIMA?


Luigi Cataldi


Il 25/07/22 23:09, Bob Tennent ha scritto:
I've just learned that Dirk, the author of the m-tx preprocessor died 
in 2019.  Is anyone interested in taking over the original sources (in 
Pascal)?  I'll continue to maintain the CTAN package as long as there 
is interest.


Bob T.

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] New PMX version

[Luigi Cataldi]

I don't know if this is useful. In order to compile pmx294 I see that 
gfortran version that comes with the Debian 9 distribution (Debian 
6.3.0-18+deb9u1) works well, while the second that comes with Fedora 30 
distribution (Red Hat 9.2.1-1) doesn't work. These are the 
specifications of the two different versions:


GNU Fortran (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) 6.3.0 20170516
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.2.1 20190827 (Red Hat 9.2.1-1)
Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Regards

Luigi


Il 05/02/20 22:14, Don Simons ha scritto:

It's frustrating not having any Linux version in which I can personally
investigate the problems people are reporting with compiling and running
PMX294. As far as I recall, we've never had problems like this before. So if
it's possible to make it run alongside or under my Windows 7 OS, I'm willing
to download and install one version of Linux. Can anyone advise me (1)
whether that's possible; (2) if so, which Linux system would be the one that
would be most useful for the problem at hand (i.e., resolving FORTRAN
compilation issues); (3) where to go to get the download; (4) is a FORTRAN
compiler included in the download; (5) if not, which fortran compiler should
I download and install and where should I go to get it?

--Don


-Original Message-
From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-
bounces+dsimons=roadrunner@tug.org] On Behalf Of Christian
Mondrup
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2020 7:27 AM
To: tex-music@tug.org
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] New PMX version

Den 03.02.2020 kl. 07.59 skrev Luigi Cataldi:

Dear Don, in my Fedora 30 Linux I'm able to compile pmxab.for only
with 'f2c'. With the previous pmx version I had made several attempts
with 'gfortran' and 'g77' but all of them failed. As far as I know,
however, 'f2c' no longer exists in Ubuntu and this is a problem.

'f2c' is indeed distributed with linux mint 19.3 based on Ubuntu 18.04

bionic

On Fedora 30 I have used the following command:

'f2c -g -\!bs < pmx294.for > pmxab.c'

The compilation returned me only one warning message:

'Warning on line 11244: local variable gotclef never used'

There was no problem with compiling via 'gcc' with the command:

gcc pmxab.c -lf2c -lm -o pmxab

It happens nearly the same with 'scor2prt':

f2c -g -\!bs < scor2prt.for > scor2prt.c

'Warning on line 783: local variable dumq never used'

As far as I could see, 'pmx294' works well.

Compiling pmx294.for with f2c and gcc in my Ubuntu 18.04 based
environment completes with no errors and warnings. The compiled binary
doesn't work, however. When I launch it on a pmx files I get no output at

all -

no error messages, no output file.

Contrarily a binary compiled with gfortran from pmx294.for works

perfectly.

Greetings
--
Christian Mondrup
WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] New PMX version

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear Don,
in my Fedora 30 Linux I'm able to compile pmxab.for only with 'f2c'. 
With the previous pmx version I had made several attempts with 
'gfortran' and 'g77' but all of them failed. As far as I know, however, 
'f2c' no longer exists in Ubuntu and this is a problem.


On Fedora 30 I have used the following command:

    'f2c -g -\!bs < pmx294.for > pmxab.c'

The compilation returned me only one warning message:

    'Warning on line 11244: local variable gotclef never used'

There was no problem with compiling via 'gcc' with the command:

    gcc pmxab.c -lf2c -lm -o pmxab

It happens nearly the same with 'scor2prt':

    f2c -g -\!bs < scor2prt.for > scor2prt.c

    'Warning on line 783: local variable dumq never used'

As far as I could see, 'pmx294' works well.

Best regards (and thanks for your wonderful program!)

Luigi

Il 03/02/20 05:48, Don Simons ha scritto:


Since last Tuesday I’ve had some more interaction with Bob and 
Christian about other issues compiling version 2.94 of PMX. I think 
Bob’s are resolved without any further revisions, but I believe 
Christian is still unable to create a functioning executable using 
fort77 under Linux. I’d very much appreciate it if some more folks 
would download the zip, compile pmx294.for, and report back on what 
system and compiler you used and whether the resulting executable runs OK.


Thanks,

--Don Simons

*From:* Don Simons [mailto:dsim...@roadrunner.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2020 8:19 PM
*To:* 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
*Subject:* RE: New PMX version

With help from Christian Mondrup and Bob Tennent I’ve addressed a few 
FORTRAN bugs, and reposted the entire zip file under the same name. 
FYI these were very subtle, not showing up with my gfortran compiler 
but they did occur with several other compilers that Christian and Bob 
used. Hopefully they’re now fixed. If you downloaded the older one 
from yesterday, to be safe please replace it with today’s version.


Happy PMX’ing!

--Don Simons

*From:* Don Simons [mailto:dsim...@roadrunner.com]
*Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2020 7:30 AM
*To:* 'Werner Icking Music Archive' >

*Subject:* New PMX version

I’ve just created a new full release of PMX (Version 2.94), and it’s 
available from the archive at


https://icking-music-archive.org/software/htdocs/index.html .

No major external changes, but I did a lot of internal tweaking on 
moving dots, focused on main and chordal notes in dotted 2-note 
tremolos. I’d appreciate any feedback in case I’ve introduced any 
bugs. Bob Tennent will soon be preparing it for submission to TeXLive 
to make it more easily available to platforms other than Windows.


--Don Simons


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[Tex-music] PMX290: character "o" in meter change

[Luigi Cataldi]

It seems that in meter change PMX290 accepts "m1/8/0/0", but not "mo800".
You can prove this with the following example.

Regards

Luigi

1 1 12 8 12 8 0 -1
1 2 20 0.0

t
./
Abr

f8+ g a d- e f g d bs g g+ f /
ef f g c- d e f c a f f+ e /
d ef f b- c d e b e g e g /
c- d ef f g af bs- c d g- c b /
mo800 c Rz /

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Space between staves and lyrics not working correctly in M-Tx

[Luigi Cataldi]

A simple way to solve the problem is to put '@-8' at the beginning of the
first line of music and, in the same position of the second line, '@+8' in
order to restore the normal position:

@-8 c d [[ e8 g ] ( [ e d  ] ) ( [ d c ] ) ( [ c d ] ) d4 g (" [[ g8 a ] )
g4 {rep1} ( [ g8 a ] ) a4 a

@+8 [[ g8- g ] [[ g8 g ] [[ c e ] [[ d d ] c4

Regards

Luigi Cataldi


2017-06-06 15:21 GMT+02:00 King Emir :

> Hi all,
>
> attached file prints the lyrics line too high, so that it they are over
> the staves. Note that the meter is 0/4. I compile with m-tx -p
> asadoyayunta. How to solve the problem? Thanks
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] scor2prt error

[Luigi Cataldi]

The score is part of a whole edition of the Symphonias by Bach that was on 
Wima, and, yes I have used %% as you suggest.

I've compiled with gfortran your revised source code (s2p2.for) on both 32 and 
64 bit linux OS and the resulting programs work well. Thank you

Luigi



On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:51:25 -0800
Don Simons  wrote:

> I wrote
> 
> > Luigi, maybe scor2prt is punishing you for trying to make parts before you
> > finished editing the score :-)
> > 
> 
> Luigi, I have to apologize for that comment; when I copied the pmx source
> from the posting in order to work with it, some of the line breaks got
> unfolded, and in a way that the file still went through PMX. But in the
> score parts different lines got shuffled with each other, leaving many notes
> with lots of ledger lines, and many slurs and ties dangling. 
> 
> But more recently, and after getting a proper version of the input file, I
> did notice that you used
> 
> \\sepbarrules\
> \\akkoladen{{1}{3}}\
> 
> in the score. All type 2 inline TeX is normally copied into parts. The
> \sepbarrules has no effect in parts, but the \akkoladen causes some unwanted
> garbage at the beginning of each staff in the parts. So in the score you
> should probably have used
> 
> %%
> \\sepbarrules\
> \\akkoladen{{1}{3}}\
> 
> or
> 
> %%
> \\sepbarrules\akkoladen{{1}{3}}\
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Umlaut o

[Luigi Cataldi]

> Next, when I run pmx, the pasted umlaut o
> does get copied into the tex file, but when tex'ing the result, it is not
> recognized at all; I don't even get a blank space. I could use what is
> suggested in the TeXbook, i.e., \"o, and my TeX setup does recognize that,
> but unless I do some more programming on pmx, I can't use that in a pmx
> lyrics string since the quote mark confuses pmx.


I have used a lot of times {\"o} without problem in MTX code, that PMX 
recognizes well. As an example, here is the text of Mozart's Lied I've printed 
(you'll find at 
http://imslp.org/wiki/Abendempfindung,_K.523_%28Mozart,_Wolfgang_Amadeus%29)

Luigi

***
A-bend ist's, die Son-ne ist ver-schwun-den,
Und der Mond strahlt Sil-ber-glanz;
So ent-flieh'n des Le-bens sch{\"o}n-ste Stun-den,
Flieh'n vor-{\"u}-ber wie im Tanz!
Bald ent-flieht des Le-bens bun-te Sze-ne,
Und der Vor-hang rollt her-ab.
Aus ist un-ser Spiel! des Freun-des Tr{\"a}-ne
Flie-{\ss}et schon auf un-ser Grab.
Bald viel-leicht {---~mir} weht, wie West-wind lei-se,
Ei-ne stil-le Ah-nung {zu~---}
Schlie{\ss}' ich die-se Le-bens Pil-ger-rei-se,
Flie-ge in das Land der Ruh'.
Werd't ihr dann an mei-nem Gra-be wei-nen,
Trau-ernd mei-ne A-sche seh'n,
Dann, o Freun-de, will ich euch er-schei-nen
Und will Him-mel auf euch weh'n.
Schenk' auch du ein Tr{\"a}n-chen mir
Und pfl{\"u}-cke mir ein Veil-chen auf mein Grab;
Und mit dei-nem see-len-vol-len Bli-cke
Sieh' dann sanft auf mich her-ab,
sieh' dann sanft, sieh' dann sanft auf mich her-ab.
Weih' mir ei-ne Tr{\"a}-ne und ach!
Sch{\"a}-me dich nur nicht, sie mir zu weih'n,
O sie wird in mei-nem Di-a-de-me
Dann die sch{\"o}n-ste Per-le sein,
O sie wird in mei-nem Di-a-de-me
Dann die sch{\"o}n-ste, die sch{\"o}n-ste, die sch{\"o}n-ste Per-le sein,
sie wird, die sch{\"o}n-ste Per-le sein,
die sch{\"o}n-ste Per-le sein.




-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] scor2prt error

[Luigi Cataldi]

> Luigi, maybe scor2prt is punishing you for trying to make parts before you
> finished editing the score :-)
> 
> Beyond that, I'm afraid I don't have a clue what the problem is. My version
> works fine. The only change I've made in the code in the last 3 years is to
> insert a missing type declaration for a common variable in one subroutine
> where it wasn't being used. Do you have an older version that does work? If
> so, could you send me the source code for that and for the one that doesn't
> work?

Don,
the previous version that works was compiled from this source:
http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/s2p2511.zip

But was compiled with f2c instead of gfortran, and I think that this is the 
problem,
not only for the previous version but even for the actual.

> Did you replace the 3-argument call getarg lines by the
> 2-argument lines? Does line 1285 look like this:
> 
> logical insetup,replacing,botv
> 
> Those are the only modifications I made to scor2prt.for when
> I created the CTAN package. Have you tried building the
> tarball in that package?
> 
> http://mirrors.ctan.org/support/pmx/pmx-2.7.3.tar.gz

Bob,
i compiled the source from pmx.zip, but the only difference is that the 1485 
line was

logical insetup,replacing

The error comes even if I add ",botv" in that line.

Using configure, make and install procedure from the source pmx-2.7.3.tar.gz, 
the resulting scor2prt works well and all is ok. But for the compilation is 
used f2c and not gfortran (isn't true?). If I try to compile from that source 
with gfortran (with command "gfortran -O scor2prt.for -o scor2prt") the 
resultant scor2prt doesn't work.

What I'm doing wrong?

Luigi


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[Tex-music] scor2prt error

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,

if I try to extract parts from the following pmx code (but this happens in many 
other cases) with scor2prt that comes with pmx273 version I have the following 
error:

***
 This is scor2prt for PMX 2.7, 2 April 2013
At line 336 of file scor2prt.for (unit = 10, file = '3v01.pmx')
Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, 
possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE
***

I've compiled scor2prt with
GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1) 4.8.4

OS linux 32bit

The same happens with another computer with a linux 64bit OS in which scor2prt 
was compiled with 
GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 5.2.1-22ubuntu2) 5.2.1 20151010

No error message during the compilation of scor2prt.

Someone can help me?

Luigi Cataldi


*** pmx code
3 3 4 4 0 6 0 0 2 8 20 0.0



bat
./

B
%%
% Raggruppamento pentagrammi con graffa
%%
\\sepbarrules\
%%
\\akkoladen{{1}{3}}\
ArbeI.87
Iivcvavlv100:100:100g2t72
%1 Iivcg2t72
%2 Iivag2t72
%3 Iivlg2t72
Tt
Sinfonia n. 1
Tc
BWV 787
Ar
% Batt. 1
c43 r8 c8+ b8 g8 a8 b8 /
rp /
r1 g14 a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 f1 g1 a1 f1 a1 g1 f1 /

% Batt. 2
c4 r8 b8 a8 g8 a8 d8- /
r1 c14 d1 e1 f1 g1 a1 b1 c1 b1 c1 d1 c1 e1 d1 c1 /
e2 s e4 s f4s /

% Batt. 3
g1-a g1+ a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 f1 g1 a1 f1 a1 g1 f1 /
[ b8 d8 ] s d8 s c8 s c4 s b4 s /
g8 f8 e4 d8 e1 f1 d4 s /

% Batt. 4
e1 f1 e1 d1 c1 b1 a1 g1 f1 g1 f1 e1 f1 d1 e1 f1 /
b4 s r1 d1 c1 b1 a4d a8 /
d8 s g1 f1 e4 s e8 s e8 d4 s /

% Batt. 5
e1 g1- a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 f1 g1 a1 f1 a1 g1 f1 /
g8 f8 e4 d2 s /
d4d s c8 s c8 s b1 ot a1 b1 c1 d1 b1 /

% Batt. 6
e2 s e4 s d4 /
d1 s f1 e1 d1 c1 b1 a1 g1 f1 g1 f1 e1 f1 d1 e1 f1 /
g4 s g1 s c1 d1 e1 a1- b1 a1 b1 b8d ot a3 b3 /

% Batt. 7
c1 d1 c1 b1 a1 g1 f1s e1 d1 e1+ d1 c1 b1 a1 g1 f1 /
e4 r8 e8+ f4s r1 c1+ b1 a1 /
c8 g8 c4 s c8 s b1 ot a1 d4 s /

% Batt. 8
e1 f1+n e1 d1 c1 b1 a1 g1 f1s d1 e1 f1 g1 a1 b1 c1 /
g4 s g1 s g1 c1 b1 c4 b4 /
d1 s b1 c1 d1 e4 s e8 s a4 g8 s /

% Batt. 9
d1 c1 d1 e1 c1 e1 d1 c1 b4 b4+ s /
a2 s a1 s c1 b1 a1 g1 f1s e1 d1 /
g8 s f1s e1 f1 g1 a1 f1 d4 s d1 s g1 a1 b1 /

% Batt. 10
b4 s a4 e8 d8 c4 /
c1 d1 c1 b1 c1 a1 b1 c1 b4 s b1 s b1 a1 g1 /
e1- f1s e1 f1 f8d e3 f3 g1 a1 g1 f1 e1 d1 c1 b1 /

% Batt. 11
d1 g1 f1s e1 d1 c1 b1 a1 g1 a1 g1 f1n g1 e1 f1 g1 /
f8s r8 r4 r1 d1+ e1 f1 e4 s /
a1 b1 a1 g1 a1 f1s g1 a1 b4 s b1 s g1 a1 b1f /

% Batt. 12
c8-s d8+ c8s b8 a8 g8+ f8 e8 /
e1 s r1 r8 r4 r8 a8- b8 c8s /
a1 e1 f1 g1 a1 b1n c1s d1 e1 d1 e1 f1 e1 b1+f a1n g1 /

% Batt. 13
d8 r8 r4 r1 g1+ f1 e1 d1 c1n b1f a1 /
d1a d1 e1 f1 g1 a1 b1 c1s d1 c1 d1 e1 c1n e1f d1 c1 /
f1 g1 f1 e1 d1 c1s d1 e1 f4 f4s /

% Batt. 14
g1 c1- d1 e1 f1 g1 a1 b1f c1 b1 c1 d1 b1 d1 c1 b1 /
b1f a1 b1 c1 a1 c1 b1 a1 g4d g8 /
g4 f4n s f8 s e1 d1 e4 s /

% Batt. 15
a1 g1 a1 b1n Cn c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 f1 g1 a1 f1 a1 g1 f1 /
f4 e8 r8 r2 /
[ e8 s d8 ] s d8 s c8 s c8 s b1n ot a1 b8 d8 /

% Batt. 16
e4 r4 r1 c1+ b1 a1 g1 f1 e1 d1 /
r1 f1 g1 a1 Ct b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 e1 f1 g1 f1 a1 g1 f1 /
g4 s g1 s a1 f1 g1 a4 b4 /

% Batt. 17
Cb c1 d1 c1 b1f c1 a1 b1 c1 f1- g1 f1 e1 d1 c1 b1n a1 /
[ e8 a8 ] s a8 s g8 s g1 s c1- d1 e1 f4 s /
c4 b4f a4 s a1 s e1 d1 c1 /

% Batt. 18
g1 a1+ g1 f1 e1 d1 c1 b1f a1 b1+f a1 g1 f1 e1 d1 c1 /
f4 s r1 f1 e1 d1 Ca c1 d1 c1 b1f a4 s /
b1 d1 e1 f1 g2 s g1 s c1- f1 e1 /

% Batt. 19
b1 g1 a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 f1 g1 a1 f1 a1 g1 f1 /
[ a8 s d8 ] s d8 s c8 s c8 s b1 a1 b1 c1 d1 b1 /
f4 e4 d2 s /

% Batt. 20
e8 f1 g1 a8 c8- d8 e1 f1 g8 g8- /
g4 r1 b1f a1 g1 f1 g1 f1 e1 f1 d1 e1 f1 /
d1 s f1 e1 d1 c2 b4n /

% Batt. 21
c0 of /
e0 of /
c0 of /
%

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] XML2PMX is ready for testing

[Luigi Cataldi]

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:24:56 +0200
Dieter  wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> it took a bit more time  than I had expected, but now XML2PMX, a 
> converter (on MS Windows)
> from Recordare Inc "MusicXML"  to "PMX" is ready for testing.
> 

Is there a way to run the software under Linux?

Regards

Luigi


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] XML 2 PMX experience: The clef should have been "n"

[Luigi Cataldi]

On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:01:49 +0100
Dieter  wrote:

> WIth Tenor clef it looks much better.
> 
> Regards, DIeter
> 

Dear Dieter,
tenor clef is the right choice, but I think that the problem comes with the 
fact that every note has own stem direction inserted in the code, like, I 
suppose, happens to the xml code. One of the better feature of PMX is that not 
all the specifications of the note are needed for each note. Isn't possible to 
omit in the resulting PMX code the information about the stem direction (l or 
u), or, better, let the choice to the user if include or not this information 
in the resulting PMX code?

The same happens for the octave specification of the note, but in this case the 
problem, I suppose, is bigger, because "if the note is more than a fourth away 
from the most recent note" octave number or +/- is requested. Nevertheless with 
those two features should be possible traspositions.


A sincere compliment for your work.

Luigi

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Linebreak and Movement break

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear Dieter,
on my computer (Ubuntu Linux) PMX works fine with no error messages with your 
source file.

Regards Luigi

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:47:49 +0100
Dieter  wrote:

> Dear PMXperts,
> 
> I generated this wonderful PMX-file (Telemann Fantasie for Flute a 
> major) out of MusicXML. There is a movement break (as well as a meter 
> change) at Bar 37.
> So I put "L15M" before the notes of the Bar. and get an error condition 
> "missing number treates as zero, etc. ". What am I doing wrong? Without 
> the "M"
> everything works fine.
> 
> Regards Dieter
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Scanner Input for PMX

[Luigi Cataldi]

> 
> In the last two weeksI have been working on a prototype which reads in 
> MusicXML and spits out the notes partfor PMX.I include as examplea 
> christmas carol
> for SATB. After scanning there remained some inaccuracies, which could 
> easily resoved with the notes editor of SharpEye.
> 
> The final MusicXML code has not been touched, and everything after  and 
> including the line "% Bar 1" has been generated automatically.
> 
> Of course, my little prototype does not  (yet) completely implement 
> MusicXML. Another drawback for wider use of my development might be, 
> that I employed a somewhat exotic language: OBERON from Niklaus Wirth of 
> the ETHZ Zürich.
> 

Very interesting!
Some times ago, for linux users, there was Noteedit 
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/noteedit.berlios/), that was able to input 
MusicXML file and export it in PMX. Unluckily now the software is abandoned. 
There is a frozen version, but impossible to install on the recent 
distributions. So a MusicXML to PMX conversion is an important piece of news.

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Issues with M-Tx

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hi Don,
I don't knok why, but I think you have to leave a blank line in this way:

==
Title: Net soos ek is
Composer: Charlotte Elliott
Style: SATB
Sharps: 2
Meter: 3/4
Space: 9

%% w190m
f f f | e2s e4 | f2 b4 | a2d | g4 g g | f2 f4 | g2 c4n | b2d |
d d d | d2r d4r | d2 d4 | d2d | e4 e e | d2s d4 | e2 f4 | f2d |
L: 1. Net soos ek is, geen hulp na-by, al-leen U bloed ge-stort vir my,
L: 2. Net soos ek is, nooi U vir my, ver-ge-we, rei-nig en be-vry.
L: 3. Net soos ek is, U lief-de teer werp al-le hin-der-pa-le neer.
a a a | g2s g4 | a2 g4 | a2d | b4 b b | c2n c4 | b2 e4 | ds2d |
d d d | d2 d4 | d2 g4 | f2d | e4 e e | a2 a4 | g2 g4 | b2d |
==

Bye

Luigi

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:25:11 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> I'm trying to do some work with M-Tx and running into problems. I've changed
> computers since the last time I used it, and am now running 64-bit Windows.
> I think M-Tx may be included in the PMX package in the TeX repository, but I
> haven't installed it from there, worried that it might upset my working PMX
> installation. Instead I manually downloaded mtxP060d.zip from the Icking
> archive and just extracted prepmx.exe from there.
> 
> I ran it on the following, copied directly out of the M-Tx manual :
> ==
> Title: Net soos ek is
> Composer: Charlotte Elliott
> Style: SATB
> Sharps: 2
> Meter: 3/4
> Space: 9
> %% w190m
> f f f | e2s e4 | f2 b4 | a2d | g4 g g | f2 f4 | g2 c4n | b2d |
> d d d | d2r d4r | d2 d4 | d2d | e4 e e | d2s d4 | e2 f4 | f2d |
> L: 1. Net soos ek is, geen hulp na-by, al-leen U bloed ge-stort vir my,
> L: 2. Net soos ek is, nooi U vir my, ver-ge-we, rei-nig en be-vry.
> L: 3. Net soos ek is, U lief-de teer werp al-le hin-der-pa-le neer.
> a a a | g2s g4 | a2 g4 | a2d | b4 b b | c2n c4 | b2 e4 | ds2d |
> d d d | d2 d4 | d2 g4 | f2d | e4 e e | a2 a4 | g2 g4 | b2d |
> ==
> 
> I get the following message:
> 
> ==
> c:\Users\Don\Documents\PMX>prepmx textmtx
> ==> This is M-Tx 0.60d (Music from TeXt) <11 October 2008>
> ==>> Input from file textmtx.mtx
> Writing to textmtx.pmx
> You have not defined Meter, assuming "C" : WARNING in preamble
> Unknown line label: ERROR on line 1
> Title: Net soos ek is
> 
> c:\Users\Don\Documents\PMX>
> ==
> 
> I'm stuck. Anybody have any idea what's wrong?
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Double thin bar when number of instruments changes in MTX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you Don!

This is exactly what I was searching for.

Luigi

On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 22:15:17 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> Luigi, from your analysis, I'm guessing if you put something like the
> following TeX in the TeX source, somewhere before the \newmovement command,
> it should alter the inputs to \newmovement like you want:
> 
> \let\nmt\newmovement\def\newmovement#1#2#3{\nmt{#1}0{#3}\let\newmovement\nmt
> }
> 
> I think you know how to enter this as in-line TeX in the PMX file. I don't
> know M-Tx well enough to tell you how to do that from the M-Tx file. This is
> all untested. If you still have a problem, send me the MTx file you have or
> a working excerpt.
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Luigi
> Cataldi
> >Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 10:21 AM
> >To: tex-music@tug.org
> >Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Double thin bar when number of instruments changes
> in
> >MTX
> >
> >On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:47:45 +0200
> >Dirk Laurie  wrote:
> >
> >> M-Tx is not clever enough to recognize movement changes,
> >> but totally relies on PMX. So the question is: can PMX do it?
> >> I'm pretty sure there would be some TeX magic that can fool
> >> PMX into doing what you want by temporarily redefining
> >> certain macros.
> >>
> >
> >Sometime ago Don found a good solution for this. The solution is already in
> my
> >example. But Unluckily if in the same place there is a movement break and a
> changes
> >of the nummber of instruments MTX places the Rd command where PMX can't
> >recognise it. This is the problem. PMX insert in the tex resulting file the
> command
> >"\newmovement005" for double thin barline and "\newmovement015" for thin-
> >thick line. I confess: I'm not so skilled to redefine the command and I
> need someone
> >that can help me.
> >
> >Luigi
> >
> >--
> >Luigi Cataldi 
> >
> >---
> >TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> >If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> >http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Double thin bar when number of instruments changes in MTX

[Luigi Cataldi]

On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:47:45 +0200
Dirk Laurie  wrote:

> M-Tx is not clever enough to recognize movement changes,
> but totally relies on PMX. So the question is: can PMX do it?
> I'm pretty sure there would be some TeX magic that can fool
> PMX into doing what you want by temporarily redefining
> certain macros.
> 

Sometime ago Don found a good solution for this. The solution is already in my 
example. But Unluckily if in the same place there is a movement break and a 
changes of the nummber of instruments MTX places the Rd command where PMX can't 
recognise it. This is the problem. PMX insert in the tex resulting file the 
command "\newmovement005" for double thin barline and "\newmovement015" for 
thin-thick line. I confess: I'm not so skilled to redefine the command and I 
need someone that can help me.

Luigi

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[Tex-music] Double thin bar when number of instruments changes in MTX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,
in the following MTX example, at the end of movement 1, I want a double thin 
bar instead of the thin-thick end bar. Is there a way to obtain it?

Luigi



Style: Quartet
Meter: C
Pages: 1
Systems: 2
Size: 20
Name: {\rm{Vl~I}} {\rm{Vl~II}} {\rm{Va}} {\rm{Vc}}

%%Ab
%1
%%h
%%Mov. 1
c8 d e f g a b c |
c8 e c e c e c e |
g2 g |
c0 |

%2
c8 d e d c2 of ||
c8 e c e c2 of ||
g2 g of ||
c0 of ||

%5
%%h
%%Mov. 2
%%L2Mcr+n3134btt
m c8 d e f g a b c |
m M c8 e c e c e c e |
MS1 rp |
m c0 |

%6
c8- d e f g a b c |
M c8 e c e c e c e |
MS1 rp |
c0 |


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] LilyPond blog invites you to an engraving challenge! :-)

[Luigi Cataldi]

Here is two attempts, nott better but worse than your, I think.

Luigi

==
1 1 3 4 0 0 0 0
1 1 20 0

t
./
w2i
[um2 c15 a b e- ][ bf+ e- ] [um1+2-1 a c- gs+ e gn c- ] //
[um1-1+3 c15 a b e- ] [um1+0+1 bfi+ e- a c- ] [um1+0-1 gsi+ e gni c- ] /
===

or

===
[um1+2 c15 a b e- bf+ e- ] [um1+3-1 a c- gs+ e gn c- ] //
[um1-1+3 c15 a b e- ] [um1+1+1 bfi+ e- a c- ] [um1+1-1 gsi+ e gni c- ] /
===

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:49:06 -0800
Don Simons  wrote:

> PMX'ers--
> 
> I came up with this completely PMX approach for the first example. But the
> middle beam doesn't line up exactly. Can anyone figure out a better way,
> without any in-line TeX?
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> 
> 1 1 3 4 0 0 0 0
> 1 1 20 0
> 
> t
> .\
> w2i
> [u+0+0 c15 a b e- ][ bf+ e- ] [u+1-1 a c- ][ gs+ e gn c- ] //
> rb4 rb1 [m1+1-8 e14 a ] rb1 rb4 /
> 
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Janek
> Warchol
> >Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:24 PM
> >To: TeX-Music@tug.org
> >Subject: [Tex-music] LilyPond blog invites you to an engraving challenge!
> :-)
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >We'd like to invite MusiXTeX (and all friends) to participate in an
> >engraving "contest", together with Sibelius, Finale, LilyPond,
> >Musescore, Mup and Mozart!
> >
> >Please see
> >http://lilypondblog.org/2014/01/an-engraving-contest/
> >http://github.com/engraving-challenges/main
> >
> >(although the contest is organized by LilyPond users, this is not an
> >attempt to prove that LilyPond is better than other notation software.
> > We're sure that LilyPond will fail at some tasks, and that this will
> >be an opportunity for *everyone* to learn from each other).
> >
> >Looking forward to your reply,
> >Janek from GNU LilyPond
> >---
> >TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> >If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> >http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Number of voices chenge in MTX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you very much, Don!

This is exactly what I wonted to get!

Luigi


On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:51:35 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> Silly me, I couldn't let this rest, and started looking for ways to fool
> M-Tx into putting the right PMX code in the right places to get what Luigi
> wants without any post-editing. After many failed attempts, I did come up
> with something that sort of does it. But you may need to enter the source
> one bar at a time to get this to work. The basic idea is indeed to use MS
> ... M to get PMX to ignore some of the M-Tx-generated PMX code, but the
> devil is in the details:
> 
> 
> Style: Quintet
> Meter: 8/4
> Pages: 2
> Systems: 4
> 
> %%h
> %%Mov. 1
> c2+ c c c 
> g2 g g g 
> e2+ e e e  
> c2+ c c c 
> c2+ c c c 
> 
> %%L2Mn42345batt
> %%h
> %%Mov. 2
> g2 g g g 
> e2 e e e 
> c2 c c c 
> M c2- c c c 
> MS1 rp 
> 
> g2 g g g 
> e2 e e e 
> c2 c c c 
> M c2 c c c 
> MS1 rp
> 
> g2 g g g 
> e2 e e e 
> c2 c c c 
> M c2 c c c 
> MS1 rp
> ==
> 
> --Don Simons
> 

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Number of voices chenge in MTX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thanks to all!

The problem arises from the fact that MTX add the missing voices (with "rp", as 
Herman wrote). For this reason we need to post- edit the PMX file, and, I agree 
with Don, the solution is less than 100% satisfying.

A simple solution is to typeset the two movements in two separate MTX files and 
combine the resulting tex files in a score, but, especially in the extracted 
parts, it's possible to have a page with just one or two staffs, situation, 
once again, less than 100% satisfying.

Luigi



On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:08 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> If you need to post- edit the PMX file, the solution is less than 100%
> satisfying. Here's a thought I haven't tested: Maybe you could put inline
> PMX commands in the M-Tx source before and after any rp / you wish to
> eliminate, that record a macro and then stop recording, thereby eliminating
> the line from PMX processing at that time.
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Hermann
> Hinsch
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:13 AM
> >To: Werner Icking Music Archive
> >Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Number of voices chenge in MTX
> >
> >Am Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013, 18:18:07 schrieb Luigi Cataldi:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I know that M-Tx "is not aware of movement breaks and the possibility to
> >> change the number of voices" (MTX manual p. A-7). So, if I understand
> well,
> >> is not possible to have, for instance, 5 voices in the first movement,
> and
> >> 4 in the second, as in the pmx example printed below, at MTX level.
> >> Nevertheless is there a way to do this starting with MTX source?
> >>
> >
> >It is possible! Start with a dummy bar with the total number of voices. Use
> >the pmx command "M" and the new number of voices. As mtx doesn´t assign the
> >number of the new voices correctly you have to edit the pmx file by hand,
> make
> >the corrections and change all "rp /" by "%"
> >
> >If you are interested I can send you an example as mtx source and the
> edited
> >pmx source. You may have a look of the layout on www.rzuser.uni-
> >heidelberg.de/~nh0/QUICS.html Composer "Bruschi"
> >
> >Hermann
> >
> >
> >> And, if not, is there a way to code in MTX the two movements in two
> >> different files and join them at tex level, but preserving the same
> layout
> >> of the PMX example (pag. 1: mov. 1 on the first system, mov. 2 starting
> on
> >> the second system; pag. 2: the rest of the score)?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Luigi
> >>
> >
> >
> >---
> >TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> >If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> >http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[Tex-music] Number of voices chenge in MTX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,

I know that M-Tx "is not aware of movement breaks and the possibility to change 
the number of voices" (MTX manual p. A-7). So, if I understand well, is not 
possible to have, for instance, 5 voices in the first movement, and 4 in the 
second, as in the pmx example printed below, at MTX level. Nevertheless is 
there a way to do this starting with MTX source?

And, if not, is there a way to code in MTX the two movements in two different 
files and join them at tex level, but preserving the same layout of the PMX 
example (pag. 1: mov. 1 on the first system, mov. 2 starting on the second 
system; pag. 2: the rest of the score)?

Thanks

Luigi

 PMX example
5 5 4 4 0 6 0 0
2 4 20 0.05
Cb
Vc
Vla
Vl~II
Vl~I
bbatt
./
AI.8
%1-6
h
Mov. 1
c2- c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
e2 e | e e | e e | e e | e e | e e /
g2+ g | g g | g g | g g | g g | g g /
c2+ c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /

%7-12
h
Mov. 2
L2Mn42345batt
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
e2 e | e e | e e | e e | e e | e e /
g2 g | g g | g g | g g | g g | g g /

%13-18
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
e2 e | e e | e e | e e | e e | e e /
g2 g | g g | g g | g g | g g | g g /

%19-24
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
c2 c | c c | c c | c c | c c | c c /
e2 e | e e | e e | e e | e e | e e /
g2 g | g g | g g | g g | g g | g g /
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] AN command in 2.615 scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you Don!
I agree with you about this solution. But, on the other hand, I have just a 
couple of scores in which a changed filename of the parts was needed for an 
automatic compilation (with Makefile) of the score and parts. So isn't 
definitely not crucial the presence of backward incompatibility for me in this 
case.

Luigi

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:46:28 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> Well (blush) I do have that version, and it seems to work, but it still
> doesn't do what I was expecting. 
> 
> Lately I had in my mind that "AN" was supposed to do something different
> than what 2.511 did. I thought is should change the instrument name that is
> printed in the part from what is specified in the setup in the score file.
> Versions 2.5 and 2.6 of the manual say "The option N to the A command allows
> you to specify arbitrary names for the instrument of any or all part files
> generated by scor2prt." That's kind of ambiguous. (It would be less so if
> you replace "of" with "in", but then it would simply be wrong). When I ran
> s2p2511, what it did do was to change the names of the part files to (value
> given in "AN").pmx, but then inside that file for the part, the name under
> "Ti" was the one from the setup area of the main file. I assume that's what
> you got.
> 
> I'm leaning toward simply fixing 2.70 to do what 2.511 was doing, and
> clarifying the wording in the manual. That's despite the fact that I think
> it's kind of risky to change part file names this way due to the obvious
> danger of over-writing existing part files from another score that may have
> changed part file names the same way. And PMX does not check if you are
> over-writing existing files, it just plows ahead. Plus, I have a hard time
> understanding why anyone would want to change the part file names, while
> there are sometimes good reason to change the printed part name in a part
> file from that in the score.
> 
> But as I said, and to avoid introducing yet another backward
> incompatibility, I'm leaning toward reverting the behavior of "AN" to
> 2.511's, at least unless I hear strong and convincing objections.
> 
> Besides, using other PMX devices, it is already possible to get different
> part names printed in parts than those in the setup data in the score. I
> actually did it in one of my published volumes (Cornelius, you might want to
> add this to the tips and tricks): 
> 
> ==
> 4 4 1 4 0 5 0 3
> 19 80 20 0.08
> Basso
> \vbox{\llap{Basso}\llap{di Viola}}
> %%
> \vbox{\llap{Second}\llap{Treble}}
> %3Second Treble
> %%
> Violin
> %4Violin or Flute
> bbtt
> .\
> ...
> ==
> 
> --Don
> 
> 
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Luigi
> Cataldi
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:01 AM
> >To: tex-music@tug.org
> >Subject: Re: [Tex-music] AN command in 2.615 scor2prt
> >
> >Version 2511 that you can find in the archive in this place
> >
> >http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/s2p2511.zip
> >
> >works well both under linux debian and, if I remember well, windows.
> >
> >Luigi
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:07:53 -0700
> >Don Simons  wrote:
> >
> >> Great catch, Luigi, almost Werner-like!
> >>
> >> This one is quite a mystery. I've tried every version of scor2prt back to
> >> 2.0 (1999) and "AN" doesn't work in any of them. When I look at the code,
> I
> >> can see where the info from "AN" is input and where the part names are
> >> output, but I can't find any connection between the two. If anyone can
> find
> >> an old version where "AN" does work, that would be helpful, especially if
> >> you also had the source code. Otherwise I'll just have to reinvent some
> >> coding, and I'm afraid I don't see an easy fix, basically since the "AN"
> >> arguments are input AFTER the header info with the original part names is
> >> initially output (to a set of scratch files).
> >>
> >> --Don
> >>
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Luigi
> >> Cataldi
> >> >Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:11 AM
> >> >To: tex-music@tug.org
> >> >Subject: [Tex-music] AN command in 2.615 scor2prt
> >> >
> >> >Dear all and especially Don,
> >> >
> >&g

Re: [Tex-music] AN command in 2.615 scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Version 2511 that you can find in the archive in this place

http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/s2p2511.zip

works well both under linux debian and, if I remember well, windows.

Luigi


On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:07:53 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> Great catch, Luigi, almost Werner-like!
> 
> This one is quite a mystery. I've tried every version of scor2prt back to
> 2.0 (1999) and "AN" doesn't work in any of them. When I look at the code, I
> can see where the info from "AN" is input and where the part names are
> output, but I can't find any connection between the two. If anyone can find
> an old version where "AN" does work, that would be helpful, especially if
> you also had the source code. Otherwise I'll just have to reinvent some
> coding, and I'm afraid I don't see an easy fix, basically since the "AN"
> arguments are input AFTER the header info with the original part names is
> initially output (to a set of scratch files).
> 
> --Don
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Luigi
> Cataldi
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:11 AM
> >To: tex-music@tug.org
> >Subject: [Tex-music] AN command in 2.615 scor2prt
> >
> >Dear all and especially Don,
> >
> >it seems that the last scor2prt version (2.615) doesn't recognize "AN"
> command. I've
> >found that for instance I can't produce the right part's filename from the
> following
> >source.
> >
> >Luigi
> >
> >
> >4 4 4 4 0 6 0 0
> >1 2 20 .07
> >Vc
> >Va
> >Vl II
> >Vl I
> >batt
> >./
> >%
> >Ab
> >AN4"vl1"
> >AN3"vl2"
> >AN2"vla"
> >AN1"vc"
> >%
> >c0- | d | e | f | g | a | b | c /
> >c2- c | d d | e e | f f | g g | a a | b b | c c /
> >c4 c c c | d d d d | e e e e | f f f f | g g g g | a a a a | b b b b | c c
> c c /
> >c4 c c c | d d d d | e e e e | f f f f | g g g g | a a a a | b b b b | c c
> c c /
> >
> >
> >--
> >Luigi Cataldi 
> >---
> >TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> >If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> >http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[Tex-music] AN command in 2.615 scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all and especially Don,

it seems that the last scor2prt version (2.615) doesn't recognize "AN" command. 
I've found that for instance I can't produce the right part's filename from the 
following source.

Luigi


4 4 4 4 0 6 0 0
1 2 20 .07
Vc
Va
Vl II
Vl I
batt
./
%
Ab
AN4"vl1"
AN3"vl2"
AN2"vla"
AN1"vc"
%
c0- | d | e | f | g | a | b | c /
c2- c | d d | e e | f f | g g | a a | b b | c c /
c4 c c c | d d d d | e e e e | f f f f | g g g g | a a a a | b b b b | c c c c /
c4 c c c | d d d d | e e e e | f f f f | g g g g | a a a a | b b b b | c c c c /


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition, with MIDI too

[Luigi Cataldi]

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:02:27 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> I've just uploaded a new PMX beta to
> 
> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2622.zip
> 
> I would VERY much appreciate people experimenting with the kinds of
> situations explained in the tutorial, and any other transposition/key-change
> situations you can think of, and report back on the mailing list with bug
> reports, questions, errors in the tutorial, or suggestions.
> 

My replay comes late, sorry.

I'm very glad for the new version!
But I see that when there is an instrument written on two staves, like piano, 
in the previous versions of PMX you need to insert two midi instruments, e.g. 
"It92ipipi", whilst in pmx2622 you have to insert just one midi instrument 
("It92ipi"). This produces incompatibility with pmx files created for the old 
versions. Is there a way to avoid this problem?

Luigi

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] off-TeX topic: gamba music question!

[Luigi Cataldi]

I think that shold be n. 41 "Geduld, wenn mich falsche Zungen strechen", but 
with some differences from your sample. Here is the incipit in pmx:

>>>>
1 1 4 4 0 6 0 0
0 4 20 0

b
./
Abp
It42ivc
% 1
a8 s c s b s e- s a s c s b s e- s /
% 2
a1.c g.c fs-.c+ d-.c+ g.a bf.g cs.g e+.g- /
% 3
fn1.a e.a ds-.a+ b-.a+ e.fs g.e bf+.e- cs+.e- /
% 4
d1.fn cn.f bn-.f+ a-.f+ gs-.e+ c.a e8+ e- | a8+ rb rbd2 Rz 
>>>>

Regards

Luigi

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Centering PMX output

[Luigi Cataldi]

I usually follow an old suggestion by Werner Icking (24 may 2000) for a4 paper 
in order to obtain a centered page with margins of 1.7 cm. Here is his post to 
the list:

<<
e.g. for A4-size paper (210mm x 297mm):

\hsize 210mm\advance\hsize -34mm\hoffset -1in\advance\hoffset 17mm
\vsize 297mm\advance\vsize -34mm\voffset -1in\advance\voffset 17mm

For a test add:

\stafftopmarg 0pt\staffbotmarg 0pt\nopagenumbers\def\atnextline{\vfill}
\startpiece\NOTEs\qa{}\en\alaligne\NOTEs\qa{}\en\endpiece\eject\bye

If you want to have a standard footline omit "\nopagenumbers" and add
"\advance\vsize 24pt" behind the definition of the page.

If you use PMX the solution would be:

w176m \\hoffset -1in\advance\hoffset 17mm\
h263m \\voffset -1in\advance\voffset 17mm\

If you use scor2prt then it may help to code the PMX-comands and the
in-line TeX on seperate lines.

-- Werner

PS: DVI-drivers have a standard margin of 1 inch. Therefore \hoffset -1in
means a zero margin.
PPS: Because music needs much space I prefer 10mm margins
PPPS: For a universal paper format I start with "\hsize 210mm" and
  "\vsize 11in" which makes the output useable as well on A4-size
paper as on letter-size paper.
>>

Hope this hilft

Luigi Cataldi


On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:52:15 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> I'm in the process of adding an option in PMX that causes the output to be
> centered, so that no further horizontal or vertical offsets are needed when
> running dvips. I've set up a mechanism whereby for letter-size paper, PMX
> inserts the two TeX commands 
> 
> \hoffset-.35in
> \voffset-.62in
> 
> right after \startmuflex. I got these values by trial and error, starting
> with a PMX file with default positioning. Could someone do some
> experimentation and tell me what the comparable offsets should be for a4
> paper?
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] Imposition

[Luigi Cataldi]

Maybe I haven't understand well the problem, but I think something like 
pdfposter could help. The address is

http://pdfposter.origo.ethz.ch/

Regards

Luigi



On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:07:54 -0700
Don Simons  wrote:

> By imposition I mean converting a file defining a set of letter-size (8.5 by
> 11 in) pages into one defining a set of ledger size pages (17 by 11), each
> one containing two letter sized ones, and arranged in such a way that I can
> print the ledger sheets 2-sided to make a booklet. Over the years I've
> developed a scheme that does this at the dvi level, using a combination of
> the ancient programs dviselec, dviconca, and dvidvi. It usually works but
> sometimes fails. When it fails, it still allows me to create a ledger sized
> postscript from the final dvi (using dvips), but when viewing the postscript
> in gsview, at some page after the first gsview tells me I have bad
> postscript and refuses to go on. I'm fairly sure the problem has to do with
> the postscript specials required by type K slurs, and I tried to remedy it
> (long ago) with a PMX option to insert psslurs.pro into the postscript at
> the start of every page, but even that doesn't always solve the problem.
> 
> I know there is supposed to be an similar set of programs that let you do
> imposition at the postscript level  (psbook, etc). I've tried those too, but
> was never successful in getting acceptable control over the size and
> position of the component page images.
> 
> I'd be very interested to hear how others have approached this task. It
> seems that it would be an issue in many other TeX applications beyond
> MusiXTeX , and I'd expect there to be some number of folks out there who
> have addressed it and have it under control.
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] LaTeX vs MusiXTeX (Was: No room for new \dimen)

[Luigi Cataldi]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:43:35 +0100
Robin Fairbairns  wrote:

> incidentally, has anyone done any work on using music-xml with musixtex?
> -- my wife is a teacher, and produces all her compositions/arrangements
> with sibelius[*], which is finally now capable of xml output.

The only way I know to translate music-xml is to use Noteedit and PMX. Noteedit 
can import music-xml and export PMX code.

Regards

-- 
Luigi Cataldi 
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] PMX news: Instrument-wise transposition

[Luigi Cataldi]

Don Simons wrote:

Hey, Luigi--

Thanks for the report! You wrote

  

A very important improvement! I'm very glad to you, Don. I've tested it
with wine and it works well, 



So you enjoyed the wine? Maybe a good Chianti?

  
Here, in Trieste, Terrano (not so exquisite as Chianti, a little bit 
acid, but typical and not bad)

but I cannot compile the sources for linux
with f2c.
...



One of those inexplicable Windows batch script things happened when I
consolidated all my separate FORTRAN sources into one. (It did the same
thing OK about 200 times and screwed up the 201st). I should consult with
Andre the DOS whiz about it :-) I've manually fixed the source file,
replaced the one in the zip at
  
Now all works fine: f2c and gfortran for debian linux (ver. 4:4.3.2-2). 
Thank you!



Luigi

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] PMX news: Instrument-wise transposition

[Luigi Cataldi]

Don Simons wrote:

There's a new beta version 2.610 of PMX that has the ability to transpose
one or several selected instruments.
  
A very important improvement! I'm very glad to you, Don. I've tested it 
with wine and it works well, but I cannot compile the sources for linux 
with f2c.


I've changed to the getarg lines and compiled with the command 'f2c 
pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802' but it doesn't works.


I need some help!

Luigi

My informations:

s.o.: debian lenny 5.0.8 on kernel linux 2.6.26-2-amd64
compiler: f2c (Fortran to C Translator) version 20061008

Here is my output.

f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802

pmxab.f:
  MAIN pmxab:
  accsym:
  addask:
  addblank:
  addfb:
  addmidi:
  addstr:
  adjusteskz:
  askfig:
  backfill:
  beamend:
  beamid:
  beamn1:
  beamstrt:
  BLOCK DATA:
  catspace:
  chax:
  checkdyn:
  chkarp:
  chkimidi:
  chklit:
  chkpm4ac:
  clefsym:
  crdacc:
  crdaccs:
  doacc:
  docrd:
  dodyn:
  dograce:
Warning on line 5219 of pmxab.f: local variable lshft never used
  dopsslur:
  doslur:
  dotmov:
  dotrill:
  endslur:
  errmsg:
  eskb4:
  f1eon:
  feon:
  findbeam:
  findeonk:
  fnote:
  g1etchar:
  g1etnote:
  g1etset:
  g1etx:
  getbuf:
  getchar:
  getdyn:
  getfig:
  getgrace:
  getitransinfo:
  getmidi:
  getnote:
  getorn:
  getpmxmod:
  getset:
  getsquez:
  getx:
  i1fnodur:
  iashft:
  ifnodur:
  ifnolev:
  igetbits:
  igetvarlen:
  isdotted:
  isetvarlen:
  istring:
  lenstr:
  levrn:
  lfmt1:
  linebreakties:
  littex:
  llen:
  log2:
  logbeam:
  m1rec1:
  make1bar:
  make2bar:
  makeabar:
  midievent:
  moveln:
  mrec1:
  ncmid:
  ncmidf:
  newvoice:
  notefq:
  notex:
  ntindex:
  ntrbbb:
  numclef:
  outbar:
  pmxa:
  pmxb:
Warning on line 19094 of pmxab.f: incompatible lengths for common block 
comtrans

  poestats:
  precrd:
  printl:
  putarp:
  putast:
  putcb:
  putfig:
  putorn:
  putshft:
  puttitle:
  putxtn:
  read10:
  readin:
  readmeter:
  readnum:
  setbits:
  setbm2:
  setmac:
  setmeter:
  setupb:
  sortpoe:
  spsslur:
  sslur:
  stop1:
  topfile:
  udfq:
  udqq:
  ulfq:
  upcaseq:
  wgmeter:
  writemidi:
  writesetsign:
Warning on line 23336 of pmxab.f: ignoring text after "end".
Error on line 23337 of pmxab.f: Declaration error for  MAIN: external 
name already used

  MAIN:
Warning on line 23348 of pmxab.f: RETURN statement in main or block data
  wsclef:


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Individual key signature

[Luigi Cataldi]

I know the following way. Is this what you need?

===
3 3 4 4 0 6 0 0
1 1 20 .06
a min.
fs min.
c min.
btt
./
Abr
B
%%
\\setsign{2}{+3}\setsign{3}{-3}\
It92ibaclob
a4- b c d | e fs gs a | a gn fn e | d c b a /
f4 g a b | c ds es f | f en dn c | b a g f /
c4 d e f | g as bs c | c bn an g | f e d c /
===

If you want to produce a correct midi file you can use abcpp 
preprocessor. See the discussion


http://www.mail-archive.com/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music@mailman.nfit.au.dk/msg02319.html

Luigi

Hermann Hinsch ha scritto:


Hi all,

I would like to change the key signature of an individual staff within 
a multi-staff system, M-Tx or PMX. Possible?


Hermann




___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Public Beta of MusiXTeX T.115

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear All,

I've tried the beta versions of pmx and musixtex with some of my old 
scores (none of them with more than 12 staves). I can't compile several 
of them. This happens, for example, in the following pmx code (from 
Clementi's Sanatinas). PMX Version 2.523 works well but etex wont's 
compile. If I compile with PMX Version 2.521 etex works well. I have 
pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) in Debian Lenny.


Here is the pmx code

---
\let\:=\relax\input musixtex\:\sepbarrules\input pmx
\def\writebarno{\ifnum\barno>1\lrlap{\oldstyle\the\barno\barnoadd}\fi}%
\def\shiftbarno{3.5\Interligne}
---
2 1 3 4 3 4 0 -1
1 6 20 0

bt
./
AbI.9e
B
It72ipipi
w176m \\hoffset -1in\advance\hoffset 17mm\
h263m \\voffset -1in\advance\voffset 17mm\
% Bar 1
h-2
Andante
\zmidstaff{\ppff{p}}\zcharnote{-5}{\it{legato}}\
f43x3 a c f43x3 a c f43x3 a c /
( c25 f45 ) /
% Bar 2
f43x3 a c f43x3 a c f43x3 a c /
( a24 c45 ) /
% Bar 3
c43x3 f a c43x3 f a c43x3 e g /
( f24 g44 oT ) /
% Bar 4
f43x3 a c r4 r4 /
G2sm2sf g a44 ( f44x3 a c f45x3nf )-2 o. f o. f o. /
% Bar 5
f43x3 b d r4 r4 /
d45 ( f44x3 b d f45x3nf )-2 o. f o. f o. /
% Bar 6
f43x3 a c f43x3 a c f43x3 a c /
c45 ( a45x3nf g f e45x3 d c /
% Bar 7
b43 a4 f4l /
c45x3 ) ( e- g c45x3 ) ( f- a c45x3nf ) ( f- a /
% Bar 8
c43x3 f a c43x3 e g c43x3 e  g /
[u cd85 a14 ] g44 )-1 r4 /
% Bar 9
\zmidstaff{\ppff{\crescendo{13\elemskip}}}\ g22 f43l /
f45x3n-1f zd f zd f zd e45x3n-1f zc e zc e zc d45x3n-1 zbn d zb d zb /
% Bar 10
\zmidstaff{\ppff{f}}\ [l e43x3n+0f g c ] e23l /
g45 (u+7 g44x3nf a bn c45x3 d e /
% Bar 11
f43l g43l g42 /
a44x3n+0f f+ d [+4 e44x3n+2f zc+ )+5 e- zc+ e- zc+ ] [+3 d44x3n+1f zbn+ 
d- zb+ d- zb+ ] /

% Bar 12
c42 g42 c43 /
f24 ( zd+ e44 zc+ ) /
% Bar 13
\zmidstaff{\ppff{p}}\ rp /
c45x3 c c ( ef45x3 d c [l b44x3 a  g ] ) /
% Bar 14
c44 b43 fs43l /
( fs44x3 a d- ) ( g44x3 b d- ) ( a44x3 c d- ) /
% Bar 15
g43l r4 r4 /
b44x3 b b ( d45x3 c b [l a44x3 g f ] ) /
% Bar 16
b43 a43 f43l /
( e44x3 g c- ) ( f44x3 a c )  [ c45x3  ( za  g zb f ) za ] /
% Bar 17
c43x3 c+ c c44 r4 /
( f44 za [+1+2 e44x3 ) zg a zc a zc ] [ c45x3 ( za g zb f ) za ] /
% Bar 18
c43x3 c+ c c44x3 d c b43x3 a  g /
( f44 za e44 ) zg r4 /
% Bar 19
f43x3 a c f43x3 a c f43x3 a  c /
( c25 f45 ) /
% Bar 20
f43x3 a c f43x3 a c f43x3 a c /
( a24 c45 ) /
% Bar 21
f43x3 a c f43x3 a c f43x3 a c /
( ef24 e44 ) oT /
% Bar 22
b23 r4 /
G2sm2sd e ( d44x3n+0f f b d45x3 )-1+0-2 o. d o. d o. d45 /
% Bar 23
\zmidstaff{\ppff{\crescendo{13\elemskip}}}\ c22 b42 /
[+1 g44x3 zb g zb g zb ] [+1 f44x3n+0f za f za f za ] [+1 e44x3n+0f zg e 
zg e zg ] /

% Bar 24
\zmidstaff{\ppff{f}}\ a42x3n+0f c f a42x3n+0f c f a42x3n+0f c  f /
(u+5 cd85 f14 f45x3n+0f e d c45x3 b a /
% Bar 25
b42x3n+0f d g c43x3 f a c43x3 e g /
g44x3 b d f44 g44 )+5 oT4 /
% Bar 26
f42x3n+0f a c f43x3n+0f c a f42 /
G2sm2sf g fd24 /
%
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] M-Tx, number of staves

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hermann Hinsch ha scritto:


Luigi, I applied the above commands on your modified mtx source but I 
always got an empty


grancinia.pmx. I used abcpp from WIMA.

Hermann

I can't say why. But there isn't a real difference from the use of a sed 
script.


Even if I am very interesting to find a whole compatibility of MTX with 
PMX, in your case I think that the simplest way is to use only PMX and 
Musixlyr. Here is my attempt to do so.


bye

Luigi


---
\input musixtex
\input pmx
\input musixlyr

\setlyrics{v1A}{%
Au-di-te po-pu-li, au-di-te, au-di-te %
quid lo-qua-tur Do-mi-nus %
quid glo-ri-a-ri in ma-li-ti-a, %
quid glo-ri-a-ri in ma-li-ti-a %
qui po-ten-tes in i-qui-ta-}

\setlyrics{v1AA}{%
tem.}

\setlyrics{v1B}{%
o stul-ti, o stul-ti a-li-quan-do %
sa-pi-te a-man-tes in-tel-li-gi-te %
ad-huc mo-cum, et pae-ca-tor-rum e-rit, %
ut um-bra trans-i-bit, vi-te ve-stra %
pes-i-bit ut sti-pu-la %
sic-ca quam pro-ii-cit %
ven-tus, et si-cut fa- %
vil-la quam tur-}

\setlyrics{v2}{%
Quis in-sur-git ad-ver-sum nos %
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras  %
quis in-sur-git ad ver-sum nos, %
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras }

\setlyrics{v3}{%
Quis in-sur-git ad-ver-sum nos %
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras,  %
sur-git ad-ver-sum nos %
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras }

\let\BM\beginmel
\let\EM\endmel
---
4 4 4 4 0 6 0 0
4 13 20 0.12
v4
v3
v2
v1
bttt
./
Ab
Ae
It100

% 1
%%
\\grouptop{1}{4}\groupbottom{1}{1}\
r0b /
r0b /
r0b /
r0b /

% 2
%%
L2P2Mn214btr+
%%
\\\grouptop{1}{2}\groupbottom{1}{1}\
c03 s /
\assignlyricshere{v1A}\lyrraise{2}{b 3\internote}\ r8 ga85 ga8 ga8 ea8d 
da1 ca8 ga8+ /


% 3
c03 s /
e45 ca8 ga8+ e4 c4 /

% 4
c23 f2- /
r4 ga85d ea1 (S \BM\ c2 /

% 5
f22s g2 /
\EM\ c45 )S d4- d4d c8 /

% 6
c23 c2 /
c25 r8 ea8 fa8 ga8 /

% 7
g43 c4- f2 7 x386 /
da85 da8 ea8 ea8 e4d d8 /

% 8
e23 # d2 6# /
e25 r8 ba8 ca8 da8 /

% 9
e43 c4s e2 4 x143 /
ga84s ga8 aa8 aa8 a4d g8 /

% 10
a02 /
a44 aa8 ba8 c4 c4 /

% 11
f43 e4 d2 7 x146 Rb /
r8 ca8 da8 ea8 f2 /

% 12
%%
L6P3Mn41234btttcr-i.0
%%
\\\grouptop{1}{4}\groupbottom{1}{1}\
m6/2/0/3
c03d f0-d /
r2 \assignlyricshere{v2}\lyrraise{2}{b 0\internote}\ c25 g2 a2 b2 c2 /
rp /
\assignlyricshere{v1AA}\ e05d r0 r2b /

% 13
g02d 4 x123 c0d /
c05 b2 e0d /
r2 \assignlyricshere{v3}\ g25 d2 e2 f2s g2 /
r0b r9 /

% 14
d03d 4 x123 g0-d Rb /
r2 a24 a2 b2d c4 d2 /
g05 f2s g0d /
r0b r9 /

% 15
%%
\\\grouptop{1}{3}\groupbottom{1}{1}\
%%
L7Mn3123bttcr-i.0
a02d 4 x123 d0d /
d05 c2s \BM\ d2d e4 c4 d4 /
r2 e25 e2 f2sd g4 a2 /

% 16
e03d 4 x123 a0-d /
b44 c4 d4 c4 \EM\ b2  a0 r2 /
a05 g2s \BM\ a2d b4 g4 a4 /

% 17
b02d e0d /
r2b r0 r2 g24s g2 /
f45s g4 a4 g4 f2 e2 \EM\ b2  b2 /

% 18
a02 e2 6 g0d /
a24 b2 c2 c0 b2 /
c25 d2 e2 d0 d2 /

% 19
c03d e0d # /
c05d r2 g2s g2 /
e05d r2 b2 b2 /

% 20
a02 e2 6 g0d /
a24d b4 c2 c0 b2 /
c25d d4 e2 d0 d2 /

% 21
c23 e0 6 f2 d0 - /
\BM\ c25d d4 b4 c4 a2 d4 e4 c4 d4 /
\BM\ e25d f4 d4 e4 c2 f4 g4 e4 f4 /

% 22
g23 c0 - a0 f2 s /
b24 e4 f4 d4 e4 c2 d4 e4 f4 e4 /
d25 g4 a4 f4 g4 e2 f4 g4 a4 g4 /

% 23
m3/2/0/0
f23 s g0 /
d45 e4 \EM\ b0  /
f45 e4 \EM\ d0  /

% 24
m2/4/0/6
\wh3\ r2b /
c25 /
e25 /

% 25
%%
L10Mn214btcr-i.0
%%
\\\grouptop{1}{2}\groupbottom{1}{1}\
m2/4/0/0
r2b /
r8 \assignlyricshere{v1B}\lyrraise{2}{b 3\internote}\ ga85 ea8 ea1 ga1 /

% 26
m4/4/0/0
c23 a2 7 x146 /
ca8- ca8 r8 ca1 ca1 c4d b8 /

% 27
g22 d2+ # /
da8d da1 d4 r8 d8 (S \BM\ d4 /

% 28
b22 7 x186 a2 # /
\EM\ d8 )S da8 da8 ca8s ea8d ea1 e4 /

% 29
c23s d2 /
r4 ea8 aa8- \BM\ a4d \EM\ b8  /

% 30
e23 # g2-s /
g4s ba8 ba8 (S \BM\ e2 /

% 31
a22 b2 /
\EM\ e4 )S ea8 ea8 e4d (S \BM\ d8s /

% 32
e23 # d4 # e4 /
\EM\ e4 )S r8 ba8 da8 da1 ca1 b4 /

% 33
a42 e4+ # d4 e4 /
a4 r8 ba1 ca1 da8 da1 ca1 b4 /

% 34
a22 - a2 /
a4 r8 c8 c4d da1 ea1 /

% 35
f02 /
fa8 fa8 r8 a8 f4d fa1 ea1 /

%


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] M-Tx, number of staves

[Luigi Cataldi]

Of course I forgot the attachment, sorry!

Luigi


grancinia.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] M-Tx, number of staves

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear All,

I've tried some experiments on Herman's example. I've used abcpp as a 
pmx preprocessor (or mtx post-processor if you want) instead of sed or 
similar post-processing scripts. At the and of this letter you can see 
the files 'grancini.mtx' and 'abcpp_pre.txt' (a preamble needed to 
process the pmx code with abcpp). I've compiled in this way:


prepmx grancini
abcpp abcpp_pre.txt > grancinia.pmx
pmxab grancinia
rm grancinia.mx?
tex grancinia
musixflx grancinia
tex grancinia
dvips -pp 2-5 grancinia
ps2pdf grancinia.ps

I'm sending the pdf resulting file too, in which is evident a problem in 
the vertical justification. In the first page you may see clearly that 
the two hyphens after the last syllable 'ta' are misplaced above the 
system. I think that the additional space above the last system comes 
from this problem, but, I'm sorry, I can't say why. Any Idea?


I read in the musixlyr manual (chapter 3.9, p. 18) that the use of

\notes...&\assignlyricshere{soprano}...\en

is better that the normal \assignlyrics{2}{soprano} in case of 
alteration of instrument numbers like in our case, but this command 
doesn't understand melismas inserted by mtx. Is there a solution for this?


Last.
Olivier, I am left speechless for the admiration at your example about 
the way to change the number of instruments within a staff. Wonderful! 
Maybe it's possible to imagine a macro that common and not skilled 
people like me can use in some occasion?


Luigi

### abcpp_pre.txt ###
#define "rpb /" %
#include grancini.pmx
### end ##

% %% grancini.mtx %% Cut here
Style: TTTB4
TTTB4: Voices T1 T2 T3 B; Choral; Clefs G8 G8 G8 F
Meter: C
Size: 20
Pages: 4
Systems: 13
Name: v1 v2 v3 v4

{v1A}
Au-di-te po-pu-li, au-di-te, au-di-te
quid lo-qua-tur Do-mi-nus
quid glo-ri-a-ri in ma-li-ti-a,
quid glo-ri-a-ri in ma-li-ti-a
qui po-ten-tes in i-qui-ta-tem

{v1B}
o stul-ti, o stul-ti a-li-quan-do
sa-pi-te a-man-tes in-tel-li-gi-te
ad-huc mo-cum, et pae-ca-tor-rum e-rit,
ut um-bra trans-i-bit, vi-te ve-stra
pes-i-bit ut sti-pu-la
sic-ca quam pro-ii-cit
ven-tus, et si-cut fa-
vil-la quam tur-

{v2}
Quis in-sur-git ad-ver-sum nos
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras
quis in-sur-git ad ver-sum nos,
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras

{v3}
Quis in-sur-git ad-ver-sum nos
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras,
sur-git ad-ver-sum nos
quis im-pro-pe-rat vi-as no-stras

%% w176m
%% \\hoffset -1in\advance\hoffset 17mm\
%%h263m
%% \\voffset -1in\advance\voffset 17mm\
%% Ab
% 1
r0b
r0b
r0b
r0b

% 2
%% L2P2Mn214btr+
%%\\\mtxGroup{1}{2}{1}\

%%\\\mtxAssignLyrics{2}{v1A}\

%% \\\mtxLyricsAdjust{2}{4}\
r8 g85 g8 g8 e8d d1 c8 g8+
L: {v1A}
rpb
rpb
c03 s

% 3
e45 c8 g8+ e4 c4
rpb
rpb
c03 s

% 4
r4 g85d e1 ( c2
rpb
rpb
c23 f2-

% 5
c45 ) d4- d4d c8
rpb
rpb
f22s g2

% 6
c25 r8 e8 f8 g8
rpb
rpb
c23 c2

% 7
d85 d8 e8 e8 e4d d8
rpb
rpb
g43 c4- f2 7 x386

% 8
e25 r8 b8 c8 d8
rpb
rpb
e23 # d2 6#

% 9
g84s g8 a8 a8 a4d g8
rpb
rpb
e43 c4s e2 4 x143

% 10
a44 a8 b8 c4 c4
rpb
rpb
a02

% 11
r8 c d e f2
rpb
rpb
f43 e4 d2 7 x146

% 12

%% \\\mtxLyricsAdjust{2}{0}\
%% L6P3Mn41234btttcr-i.0
m6203 e05d r0 rb2
m6203 rp
m6203 r2 c25 g2 a2 b2 c2
L: {v2}
m6203 c03d fd0-

% 13
r0b r9
r2 g25 d2 e2 f2s g2
L: {v3}
c05 b2 e0d
g02d 4 x123 c0d

% 14
r0b r9
g05 f2s g0d
r2 a24 a2 b2d c4 d2
d03d 4 x123 g0-d

% 15
%% L7Mn3123bttcr-i.0
%%\\\mtxGroup{1}{3}{1}\
rpb
r2 e25 e2 f2sd g4 a2
d05 c2s (~ d2d e4 c4 d4
a02d 4 x123 d0d

% 16
rpb
a05 g2s (~ a2d b4 g4 a4
b44 c4 d4 c4 b2 )~ a0 r2
e03d 4 x123 a0-d

% 17
rpb
f45s g4 a4 g4 f2 e2 b2 )~ b2
r2b r0 r2 g24s g2
b02d e0d

% 18
rpb
c25 d2 e2 d0 d2
a24 b2 c2 c0 b2
a02 e2 6 g0d

% 19
rpb
e05d r2 b2 b2
c05d r2 g2s g2
c03d e0d #

% 20
rpb
c25d d4 e2 d0 d2
a24d b4 c2 c0 b2
a02 e2 6 g0d

% 21
rpb
(~ e25d f4 d4 e4 c2 f4 g4 e4 f4
(~ c25d d4 b4 c4 a2 d4 e4 c4 d4
c23 e0 6 f2 d0 -

% 22
rpb
d25 g4 a4 f4 g4 e2 f4 g4 a4 g4
b24 e4 f4 d4 e4 c2 d4 e4 f4 e4
g23 c0 - a0 f2 s

% 23
m3200 rpb
m3200 f45 e4 d0 )~
m3200 d45 e4 b0 )~
m3200 f23 s g0

% 24
m2406 rpb
m2406 e25
m2406 c25
m2406 \wh3\ r2b

% 25
%% L10Mn214btcr-i.0
%%\\\mtxGroup{1}{2}{1}\

%%\\\mtxAssignLyrics{2}{v1B}\

%% \\\mtxLyricsAdjust{2}{4}\
m2400 r8 g85 e8 e1 g1
L: {v1B}
m2400 rpb
m2400 rpb
m2400 r2b

% 26
m4400 c8- c r c1 c c4.b
m4400 rpb
m4400 rpb
m4400 c23 a2 7 x146

% 27
d8.d d4 r8 d ( d4
rpb
rpb
g22 d2+ #

% 28
d8 ) d d cs e.e e4
rpb
rpb
b22 7 x186 a2 #

% 29
r4 e8 a- (~ a4.b )~
rpb
rpb
c23s d2

% 30
gs4 b8 b ( e2
rpb
rpb
e23 # g2-s

% 31
e4 ) e8 e ed4 ( ds8
rpb
rpb
a22 b2

% 32
e4 ) r8 b d d1 c b4
rpb
rpb
e23 # d4 # e4

% 33
a4 r8 b1 c d8 d1 c b4
rpb
rpb
a42 e4+ # d4 e4

% 34
a4 r8 c cd4 d1 e
rpb
rpb
a22 - a2

% 35
f8 f r a fd4 f1 e
rpb
rpb
f02
% %% cut here %%
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Graphical email addresses

[Luigi Cataldi]

I have followed this way. Instead of several images, I've made a list of 
all the addresses and I've converted this list in bitmap format.


For the conversion from file.eps (not bitmap) to file.png I've used a 
ghostscript command (learned from tex4ht utility) with a good result:


gs -sDEVICE=pnggray -sOutputFile=file.png -r100 -dEPSCrop -dbatch -q 
-dNOPAUSE -dTextAlphaBits=4 file.eps -c quit


You can change the resolution (here r=100).

For file.png > file.eps (bitmap) conversion I've used a little utility: 
sam2p. You'll find a windows version at 
http://code.google.com/p/sam2p/downloads/list.


Ciao

Luigi


Don Simons ha scritto:

Shamed by Luigi's having revised his tutorial, I'm working on revising the
PMX manual, which hasn't been touched since February 2004. In light of
recent posting to this list, I'd like to know the easiest way to create
graphic versions of email addresses in a LaTeX document. I'm working in
Windows XP; I have MiKTeX, Gsview32, LViewpro, and of course Paint. I tried
and succeeded in making and embedding an eps, but that turns out to retain
the character information. I've created .jpg and .bmp graphics using Paint
or Lviewpro, then tried to insert them into the LaTeX file with e.g.
\includegraphics{dsimonsemail.bmp}, but LaTeX complains that it doesn't know
the size of the graphic and needs a bounding box.  This shouldn't be so
hard. How have other people do this?


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music




___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] New revision of the italian pmx and mtx tutorial

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hi all,

I was a lazy person, sorry. Textual e-mails will be replaced with a 
figure. I'll upload the corrected version (sorry, Don, for this an 
endless series of corrected versions).


I should like to take this opportunity to ask all of you if the 
following information about the WIMA are corrected or not:


* musixtex is mantained by Don Simons, Jean-Pierre Coulon and Hiroaki 
Morimoto

* WIMA archive of scores is mantained by Christian Mondrup
* WIMA software section is mantained by Don Simons
* musixtex discussion list is administrated by Maurizio Codogno
* link to other music sources is mantained by Jean-Pierre Coulon

Thank you

Luigi

Jean-Pierre Coulon ha scritto:
Munging mail-adresses like this: peter[at]domain.com is no protection 
at all.


See: http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/mydoom_bb.shtml

Bye,

Jean-Pierre Coulon  cou...@obs-nice.fr
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music 






___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

[TeX-Music] New revision of the italian pmx and mtx tutorial

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,

I'm glad to inform you that a new revision of my pmx/mtx italian 
tutorial, "Stampa musicale con PMX", is now available on WIMA at the 
address:


http://www.icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/lcgpmx.pdf

Many thanks to Don and Christian for that.

Principal changes:

* new installation instructions for windows and linux
* new chapter with some tips and tricks, with a little tutorial on the 
preprocessor abcpp and its use in combination with mtx/pmx

* addition of the description of the new pmx features
* creation of an index (italian: indice analitico)
* correction of some mistakes and revision of all the music example

Comments and notification of mistakes are welcome!

Thanks

Luigi
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Lyrics are not displayed in resulting "*.pdf" or "*.dvi" file after compiling a "*.mtx" file

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hi Diether,

remember that you have to put the lyrics just below the vocal part, not 
below the system. See the example.


Bye

Luigi

***
%
%##   PRAEAMBEL   ###
%
Part: Akkordeon
Title: Die Kr\"ahe\\
Composer: Fredrik Vahle \& Christiane Knauf
Meter: 4/4
Systems: 3
Pages: 1
Size: 20
TEXTPIANO: Voices RH LH; Choral; Clefs G F
Style: Textpiano
%Space: 9 9

%#
%##   CORPUS   ###
%#
%%\nobarnumbers\

%###
%##   BARS   ###
%###
% - line 1
g44 | e8 e g4 e g8 g | e4 g c r | a f a c |
L: 1. Der Bau-er, der ging in den Win-ter-wald, wa-rum, da-rum,
r4  |   r0   |r0|r0   |

% - line 2
g8d g1 g8 f e4 r8 g | fd e1 f8 a d4- d8 f | ed d1 e8 g c4- r |
L: Schnee fiel in der Nacht, sein Bart war vol-ler Reif und die 
F\"u-\"se wa-ren kalt,

r0 |  r0 | r0   |

% - line 3
d4 f b- b8 d | dd c1 c8 c c4 r | r2 r4 |
L: wa-rum, da-rum, die Kr\"a-he hat ge-lacht.
r0  |r0   | r2 r4 |


Simon Dreher ha scritto:

Hi Dieter,

instead of "Style: Piano" you should use a style with lyrics. When you 
need something like piano staves with text, it could be


TEXTPIANO: Voices RH LH; Choral; Clefs G F
Style: Textpiano

Just have a look at p.8 of the manual, there are the different 
possibilities explained.


Good luck,
Simon

I've used "musictex" in combination with "LaTeX" two years ago to 
layout two pieces of music. Since one week I'm trying to learn using 
"MusiXTeX", "PMX" and "M-Tx", and my first steps typesetting notes 
were successful so far. But trying to add some lyrics is the 
beginning of my problems. When adding text as noted in "M-Tx" manual 
to my piece of music I compile it using the process "prepmx -> pmxab 
-> tex -> musixflx -> tex -> dvipdfm". But unfortunately only the 
notes are visible, not the lyrics! So I tested arround but everything 
seems to be fine, because there are no errors displayed during 
compilation or in the log files. To find out if I'm in trouble with 
my "MikTeX" installation under WindowsXP I've tested typesetting 
using the example "Net soos ek is" from Dirk Laurie's "M-Tx" manual. 
And what should I say? Everything is fine (... what else ...)!

___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music 






___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Converting Finale input files?

[Luigi Cataldi]

Christian Mondrup ha scritto:
Finale and Sibelius both support MusicXML, see 
http://recordare.com/xml.html


You don't need to write your own translator. The open source engraver 
NoteEdit imports MusicXML and exports PMX, see 
http://noteedit.berlios.de/


Noteedit is  a very good visual editor, but available only for Linux and 
not yet upgraded. I use it only when I need to convert xml to pmx, but 
in this operation there is a bug (I think): when is necessary to convert 
a staff with bass clef, the conversion fails, so it's needed to 
transpose the part into tenor clef before the conversion. In conclusion: 
a stand alone converter from xml to pmx should be really useful!


Luigi
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Vertical tweaks of slur type k in Latex doument

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you to all and expetially to Andre and Stanislav. I have the right
result both from the pdf conversion and changing the scale of the insertion.

Luigi



___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

[TeX-Music] Vertical tweaks of slur type k in Latex doument

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,

I'm working on an updating of my pmx/mtx italian tutorial and I came 
across a strange behavior. The example 23a.pmx (see below the source 
code) contains some postscript type k slurs, with global vertical tweaks 
(Ap+s). The resulting 23a.eps file (pmxab > tex/musixflx > dvips > 
ps2eps) is perfect, but when I embed 23a.eps in a latex document (see 
below the latex code), the tweaked slurs of the musical example comes in 
a wrong place in the resulting ps file (see letter G and L in the 
figure). Is this possible? I see that a similar example (Figure B.25, p. 
48) in the Cornelius' manual is faultless. Any ideas?


Regards

Luigi


 23a.pmx %
1 1 2 4 0 0 0 0
1 3 20 0

t
./
Ab
It64
w130m
\\nobarnumbers\
% 1
Ap
b4+ D"\bf A"+18 D"\tt sn"+1 s c s | b D"\bf B"+18 D"\tt sf" sf c s /

% 3
b D"\bf C"+18 D"\tt sh" sh c s | b4 D"\bf D"+18 D"\tt sH" sH c s | b 
D"\bf E"+18 D"\tt sHH" sHH c s /


% 6
a4 D"\bf F"+16 D"\tt Ap-s" s bu s /

% 7
Ap+s
a4 D"\bf G"+16 D"\tt Ap+s"-1 s bu s /

% 8
a D"\bf H"+16 D"\tt Ap+s~sp-s"-1-1 sp-s bu s /

% 9
Ap-s
b D"\bf I"+19 D"\tt Ap-s"+1 s c s /

% 10
Ap+s
b D"\bf L"+19 D"\tt Ap+s"+1 s c s Rb /

% 11
L3
c8 D"\bf M"+19 D"\tt normale"+1 s d e f s /

% 12
Ap-c
c8 D"\bf N"+19 D"\tt Ap-c"+1 s d e f s /

% 13
Ap+c+c
c8 D"\bf O"+19 D"\tt Ap+c+c+"+1 s d e f s /

% 14
Ap+c
c8 D"\bf P"+19 D"\tt Ap+c"+1 s d e f s /

% 15
Ap+c
c8 D"\bf Q"+19 D"\tt Ap+c"+1 s d e f s Rb /

 end of 23a.pmx %%


%%% slur_k.tex %%%
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage[italian]{babel}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
\usepackage[a4paper,scale=.85]{geometry}

\title{}

\author{}


\date{}

\begin{document}


\begin{figure}[!htb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=.82]{23a.eps}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\end{document}

%%% end of slur_k.tex 
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx

[Luigi Cataldi]

Don Simons wrote:

Does anyone know how well or easily any of the commercial programs handle
these matters? Specifically
1. Score entered and printed in concert key, parts printed transposed;
2. Score entered in concert key, score and parts printed transposed;
3. Score entered transposed, score and parts printed transposed;
4. Score entered transposed, score printed in concert key, parts printed
transposed;
and MIDI file OK in all cases.
Finale allows to specify different staff attributes for transposing 
instruments in his 'staff tools'. Then, from the 'options' menu, you can 
choose to print the entire score in concert key or transposed. It seems 
very simple, but I have no experience on this matter.


I have some experience in the use of Score (very good but very old 
musical editor). It uses an auxiliary program, PAGE, to transpose only 
the entire score. It's possible to transpose the parts after the 
extraction. It's possible enter transposed the parts of the transposing 
instruments or to use the transpose command to make the conversion in a 
second time, but you have to do it for every single system. A very 
annoying thing!


Mup has a simple and efficient method: you can specify the interval to 
transpose the music data in score context (for the whole piece) or in 
staff context (for transposing instruments) e.g. 'transpose = up minor 
6'. If you comment this line you can print the score and the parts in 
concert key.


With PMW you can transpose (in amount of semitones) the entire score 
either in the heading directive (e.g.: transpose -2) or via -t option 
when you invoke the program. You also can transpose a single staff in 
the stave data directive (e.g.: [stave 1 treble 1 transpose 3 key c]).


Bye

Luigi


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx

[Luigi Cataldi]

Steffen Bretz wrote:

Dear Don,

some time ago I wrote a little extension for MusiXTeX which allowed me
to write different parts of music transposed by different amounts. I
called this little script musixtrn.tex. It basically modifies the
meaning of \transpose every time the instrument is changed with
\nextinstrument. It might be improved further, especially the handling
of the first instrument, but it worked well for me.
Also for me exept for the fact that we have to correct stem direction of 
the transposing parts by hand.


To Don's question I vote for the possibility to have both version.

Bye

Luigi
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

[TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,

suppose we have 2 transposing instruments and a non transposing one. In 
PMX the convenient way to obtain transposed parts is 1) typeset all the 
voices in the tonal key (no transposition) with relative accidents (Ar) 
and 2) insert transposing command only in the desired part (e.g: %2 K-2+3).


Advantages of this method: 1) it produces a correct midi file; 2) every 
parts can be easily transposed in different keys.


But if we *need*, for editorial reasons, to print the score with the 
transposing instrument typeset in different key, we have to follow the 
trick proposed by Cornelius Noack (see his pmx manual, p.97), i.e., 1) 
insert the inline tex commands needed to set different key signature for 
the transposing instruments (setsign{n}{m}) and 2) typeset the 
transposing parts 'as they are written, not as they sound'


Disadvantages of this method: 1) it produces an incorrect midi file; 2) 
it's impossible to transpose those parts in another key.


I've found a *not so polish* trick in order to keep the advantage of the 
first method when we need to use the second one, with the aid of the 
abcpp preprocessor. Abcpp allows to define different note names and 
conditional output. So we have to:
1) define a set of note names for the first transposing instrument (XA = 
f, XB = g etc.) and another one for the second (YA = c, YB = d etc.);
2) set in conditional way a different definition of the same symbols (XA 
= a, YA = a) so that if TRASP is defined the output will be transposed 
and if not the output will not be transposed;
3) Typeset the transposing parts with relative accidents and in 
different ways (XA, XB or YA, YB etc).

4) compile with the command
  'abcpp -TRASP sample.pmp sample_tr.pmx'
  in order to obtain the score to print in editorial way
5) compile with the command
  'abcpp sample.pmp sample.pmx'
  in order to obtain the score not transposed and
  the extracted (if needed transposed) parts.

You can see a sample of the abcpp source at the end of this letter.

Disadvantages of this method: 1) we have to typeset transposing voices 
in different and unusual ways; 2) we need a preprocessor.


I'm sorry for this long, pedantic letter in my unsure english. Here 
comes my question. Is there a better way to obtain the same result (at 
tex level, for instance)?


Regards

Luigi

 sample.pmp
#ifdef TRASP
#define XA f
#define XB g
#define XC a
#define XD b
#define XE c
#define XF d
#define XG e
#define YA c
#define YB d
#define YC e
#define YD f
#define YE g
#define YF a
#define YG b
#else
#define XA a
#define XB b
#define XC c
#define XD d
#define XE e
#define XF f
#define XG g
#define YA a
#define YB b
#define YC c
#define YD d
#define YE e
#define YF f
#define YG g
#endif
3 3 4 4 0 6 0 0
1 1 20 .06
a min.
fs min.
c min.
btt
./
Abr
B
#ifdef TRASP
%%
\\setsign{2}{+3}\setsign{3}{-3}\
#endif
It92ibaclob
%1It92iba
%2It92icl
%3It92iob
a4- b c d | e fs gs a | a gn fn e | d c b a /
%2 K-2+3
XA4 XB XC XD | XE XFs XGs XA | XA XGn XFn XE | XD XC XB XA /
%3 K+2-3
YA4 YB YC YD | YE YFs YGs YA | YA YGn YFn YE | YD YC YB YA /


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] musixpss: linux compilation problem

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hiroaki MORIMOTO wrote:
Now C source of fixed version (0.52a) is here.  

  

I've compiled without problem the source and the program works well.

Thanks, Hiroaki

Regards Luigi
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] musixpss: linux compilation problem

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank to all!

I've replaced 'gets(buf);' by 'fgets(buf, 10, stdin);' and the 
compilation of the program is ok.


Bodo Meissner wrote:

I think this warning has absolutely nothing to do with the other errors.
Function gets is dangerous because it leads to a buffer overflow when the input 
line is longer than expected.

If in musixpss.c the removing of an intermediate EPS file fails, it will print 
an error message. In this case you have to type an answer and press Enter.
If you type more than 1022 characters you might get strange behavior of the 
program because of a buffer overflow.
  
Bodo you're right. And now I understand my error [allways I am wrong 
:-(]. I was invoking musixpss, with filename extension, in this way:


'musixpss myfile.slu'

My old 0.50 version the program accept the extension, whilst version 
0.52 do not allow this form. I was persuaded that the problem was in the 
compilation of the program and not in the way in which I invoke musixpss.


Thanks

Luigi




___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

[TeX-Music] musixpss: linux compilation problem

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all, and expetially Hiroaki Morimoto,

if I try to compile musixpss 0.52 with

'gcc musixpss.c -o musixpss'

I have this warning message:

'/tmp/ccKkXscu.o: In function `process_clean':
musixpss.c:(.text+0x83c): warning: the `gets' function is dangerous and 
should not be used.'


The risulting musixpss program works, but with errors.

I've the same message and the same results with:

1) gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21) on Debian 4 
etch amd64


2) gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) on Debian 5 Lenny i386

Any hint?

Luigi Cataldi

___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Prof. Christof Biebricher

[Luigi Cataldi]

I'm very sad for this announcement. I exchanged only few letters with 
him when he was working on the german version of the pmx/mtx tutorial. 
He was very kind with me. I didn't know he was a scientist (we sometimes 
know each other so little). I know he was an organist and an excellent 
music editor. He leaves a void in our little community.


Luigi Cataldi



Christian Mondrup wrote:

Dear list

Yesterday evening I received the sad announcement from Andreas 
Biebricher that his father, Prof. Christof Biebricher passed away on 
February 17.


I've had a long term email correspondance with Christof Biebricher and 
was months ago informed by him about his diagnosis, an incurable 
leukemia. Christof knew as a biophysical chemistry scientist what 
would be the outcome. His concluding comment was characteristic for 
him: "Ich kann dankbar sein für ein sehr interessantes und schönes 
Leben" ("I can be grateful for an interesting and beautiful life").


Christof was a true polyhistor practicing his science and musicianship 
with equal compassion. We in the TeX-Music community can be grateful 
for his valuable contributions, beautifully prepared editions and 
carefully researched German language documentation of our MusiXTeX 
engraving software.


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] pmx - staff jumping beam with no jump

[Luigi Cataldi]

Happy Holidays and happy new year to all.

Someone can explain to me why if there are two (or more?) bars per line 
the beams are correct? E.g.:


==

1134   3 4   0  0
1   2  20  .00

t
./
w150m
[-10+2 f84 Cb c g ] Ct [-12+2 f+ ]j [j Cb c g ] /
Ct [-10+2 f84 Cb c g ] Ct [-12+2 f+ Cb c g ] /
Ct [-10+2 f84 Cb c g ] Ct [-12+2 f+ Cb c g ] /

==


Luigi


Don Simons wrote:

Andre wrote

Is this a hidden feature?


Not any more!

Happy Holidays to all. And thanks to Andre for the little Christmas present,
in the form of a pure PMX trick to control the length of the beam. 


The issue here is that PMX doesn't account for the clef change when figuring
out how to terminate the beam. In this case it thinks the last note of the
beam is a G in treble clef, 2 ledger lines below the staff. Based on the
adjusted starting height and slope, it then reasons that the beam will pass
ABOVE that note, and extends the beam horizontally to meet where it thinks
the stem will be. As Andre very cleverly recognized, the staff jumping
options allow you to change PMX's perceived up-down-ness for the last part
of the beam. Personally with staff jumping beams I usually find myself using
"trial-and-error" to get the right up-down-ness for the 2nd segment, but
that's easy because you can use the options "u" or "d" on the "[" for the
2nd segment. In Andre's case it did work out OK without the options.

Cornelius, you might want to make this a new "tip or trick".

--Don Simons 


-Original Message-
From: icking-music-archive.org-tex-music-boun...@mailman.nfit.au.dk
[mailto:icking-music-archive.org-tex-music-boun...@mailman.nfit.au.dk]
On Behalf Of Andre Van Ryckeghem
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 7:41 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive
Subject: [TeX-Music] pmx - staff jumping beam with no jump

Hi all
Merry Christmas

This is a beamed sequence with a too long beam. This must be adapted by
in
line tex, i think.
Or by changing the hight of the beam.
But this also work by splitting the beam as in the staff jumping method.

Is this a hidden feature?

Andre

==
  1134   3 4   0  0
   1   1  20  .00

t
./
w150m
[-10+2 f84 Cb c g ] Ct [-12+2 f+ ]j [j Cb c g ] /

___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-
music


___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music




___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.519

[Luigi Cataldi]

I've tested the new version with a lot of scores: the program worked 
properly in all cases exept for this little piece of G.M. Bononcini:


http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/g.m.bononcini/4vcnt.zip

In the second PMX pass I have the following error message:

Figures not allowed in >1 voice above first

I can't locate the mistake in my source pmx file. This score was typeset 
with an experimental and not still alive pmx preprocessor, PMXPP. 
Nevertheless the resulting pmx file works well with PMX 2.5.4.


Luigi



Don Simons wrote:

Well, here's the latest bugfix of the day. Thanks to Luigi for finding the
bug. Unlike the last round, this time I could see exactly where I screwed up
and how it caused Luigi's bug. I've removed both 2.517 and 2.518 from the
S/W archive. 


Sorry for all the recent careless programming. I'm crossing my fingers that
this one will be reasonably stable. Here's the new link:

http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2519.zip

--Don Simons

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music




___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.518

[Luigi Cataldi]

I've found an error both in pmx2517 and pmx2518. When I compile the 
following sample the duration of the half note (Vl I, bar 1 and 2; Va 
bar 3) is wrong.


Luigi

---

% F. J. Haydn, Quartetto Op.76, n. 2, bb. 1--4
4 4 4  4 0 6  0 -1
1 1 16 .07
Vc
Va
Vl II
Vl I
batt
./
Ab
It92ivcvavlvl
w170m
% Batt 1-2
h
Allegro
d8-- Df o. d o. d o. d o. r d o. d o. d o. | r d o. d o. d o. r e o. e 
o. e o. /
f8- Df o. f o. f o. f o. r f o. f o. f o. | r g o. g o. g o. r g o. g o. 
g o. /

r8 a Df o. a o. a o. r a o. a o. a o. | r b o. b o. b o. r cs o. c o. c o. /
a2+ Df d- | e a- /

% Batt 3-4
f8 s e f cs s d4 a | b2 s a4 s o. r Rb /
a2 t a4 t .cs- | d8 s e f d s e4 o. r /
d8 s cs d e s e s d c s a1+ s g s | f s g f e s d8 o. d o. cs4 r /
d8 s cs d e s g s f e s a | d4- zd+ cn1 s b a gs s a4 o. r /




Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote:
I have tested the new version on a large file (the extract came from 
it) and got no errors

Thank you very much Don,

Andre
- Original Message - From: "Don Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'" 


Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 7:55 AM
Subject: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.518


This new version fixes some errors and bugs I introduced in 2.517 . 
It will
compile Andre's file (thanks for sending it!). Hopefully the FORTRAN 
source

will compile on Hermann's setup. After finding the coding errors I'm not
surprised it would have compiled in some systems but not others. What 
I am

surprised about is that it never crashed for me (like it did for Andre).
I've done three whole 2-line Pasquini sonatas already--about 12 
pages--but I

guess the troubles only started when there are at least 3 voices.

Here's a link:
http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2518.zip

--Don Simons

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music 





___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music 






___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517

[Luigi Cataldi]

Christian Mondrup wrote:

Luigi Cataldi wrote:
I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as 
Christian) and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints 
some warnings (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've 
compiled perfectly Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for 
this improvement!


Luigi


f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802
pmxab.f:
  MAIN pmxab:
Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for 
getarg,

   arg 3: here integer variable, previously ftnlen.
Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for 
getarg:

   here 4, previously 3 args and string lengths.


Did you remember to replace the comments at the getarg calls in line 
681-682 and 694-695?
Sorry, I realize that I have forgotten line 694-695. I've compiled pmx 
2.518 now. All works well but the following warnings still remains:


...
  dograce:
Warning on line 5081 of pmxab.f: local variable lshft never used
  dopsslur:
Warning on line 5663 of pmxab.f: local variable tmove never used
Warning on line 5663 of pmxab.f: local variable sfound never used
Warning on line 5663 of pmxab.f: local variable tfound never used

...

Luigi
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517

[Luigi Cataldi]

I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) 
and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings 
(see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly 
Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement!


Luigi


f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802
pmxab.f:
  MAIN pmxab:
Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg,
   arg 3: here integer variable, previously ftnlen.
Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg:
   here 4, previously 3 args and string lengths.
  accsym:
  addask:
  addblank:
  addfb:
  addmidi:
  addstr:
  adjusteskz:
  askfig:
  backfill:
  beamend:
  beamid:
  beamn1:
  beamstrt:
  BLOCK DATA:
  catspace:
  chax:
  checkdyn:
  chkarp:
  chkimidi:
  chklit:
  chkpm4ac:
  clefsym:
  crdacc:
  crdaccs:
  doacc:
  docrd:
  dodyn:
  dograce:
Warning on line 5062 of pmxab.f: local variable lshft never used
  dopsslur:
Warning on line 5644 of pmxab.f: local variable tmove never used
Warning on line 5644 of pmxab.f: local variable sfound never used
Warning on line 5644 of pmxab.f: local variable tfound never used
  doslur:
  dotmov:
  dotrill:
  endslur:
  errmsg:
  eskb4:
  f1eon:
  feon:
  findbeam:
  findeonk:
  fnote:
  g1etchar:
  g1etnote:
  g1etset:
  g1etx:
  getbuf:
  getchar:
  getdyn:
  getfig:
  getgrace:
  getmidi:
  getnote:
  getorn:
  getpmxmod:
  getset:
  getsquez:
  getx:
  i1fnodur:
  iashft:
  ifnodur:
  ifnolev:
  igetbits:
  igetvarlen:
  isdotted:
  isetvarlen:
  istring:
  lenstr:
  levrn:
  lfmt1:
  linebreakties:
  littex:
  llen:
  log2:
  logbeam:
  m1rec1:
  make1bar:
  make2bar:
  makeabar:
  midievent:
  moveln:
  mrec1:
  ncmid:
  ncmidf:
  newvoice:
  notefq:
  notex:
  ntindex:
  ntrbbb:
  numclef:
  outbar:
  pmxa:
  pmxb:
  poestats:
  precrd:
  printl:
  putarp:
  putast:
  putcb:
  putfig:
  putorn:
  putshft:
  puttitle:
  putxtn:
  read10:
  readin:
  readmeter:
  readnum:
  setbits:
  setbm2:
  setmac:
  setmeter:
  setupb:
  sortpoe:
  spsslur:
  sslur:
  stop1:
  topfile:
  udfq:
  udqq:
  ulfq:
  upcaseq:
  wgmeter:
  writemidi:
  writflot:
  wsclef:



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] lcgpmxfr.pdf

[Luigi Cataldi]

Jill-Jênn VIE ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On 26 févr. 08, at 20:34:28, Luigi Cataldi wrote:
>
>> The mistake comes from Italy ... I'm sorry. But PMX is very indulgent to 
>>
>> me and works the same.
>>
>
> You mean it worked anyway?
Yes
>
>> Thank you for the notice: I'll correct the mistake in the next revision 
>>
>> of the manual.
>>
>
> By the way I think I saw other errors... But didn't notice them :/ I 
> will, from now on.
Any correction is welcome!

Luigi

___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] lcgpmxfr.pdf

[Luigi Cataldi]

The mistake comes from Italy ... I'm sorry. But PMX is very indulgent to 
me and works the same.
Thank you for the notice: I'll correct the mistake in the next revision 
of the manual.

Luigi Cataldi

Jill-Jênn VIE ha scritto:
> Hi :-)
>
> Isn't there a mistake in the french manual?
> Page 38:
>
> % Macro emmagasinée mais non utilisée
> MS2 e4 f g2 M /
> % Mes 3 (macro utilisée)
> MP2
> % Mes 4 (macro utilisée)
> MP2 /
>
> Shouldn't it be:
>
> % Macro emmagasinée mais non utilisée
> MS2 e4 f g2 M
> % Mes 3 (macro utilisée)
> MP2 /
> % Mes 4 (macro utilisée)
> MP2 /
>
> Instead?
>
> Thanks by advance.
>
>   

___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] small installation problem

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hello Carlo,

if I understand well, your installation is ok. But remember that 
MusiXTeX have 3-pass system:

1. tex jobname
2. musixflx jobname
3. tex jobname

You have to delete 'jobname.mx1' and 'jobname.mx2' *before* any new 
compilation of the score.

P.S.
I confess that my installation directions are quite out-of-date, I'm 
sorry. Please, follow Eva's directions.

Regards

Luigi Cataldi

Carlo Centemeri ha scritto:
> Hello everybody,
> first of all, let me introduce myself: I am an organist/harpsichordist
> from Milan, Italy, and I am a long time visitor (and user) of WIMA.
> Since, as many others, I am a part time musician (in my real life I am
> a scientist) I have been using for a long time PMX and MusixTex,
> because I am also a long time LaTex user.
>
> I had to reinstall MusixTex recently on a new PC (under WindowsXP)
> after many years of glorious life of my previous installation (done
> back in 2003).
>
> After a first installation of MusixTex which was not working at all, I
> did it again following Eva Jansch guide and Luigi Cataldi guide (which
> were both referring to an earlier version of MusixTex).
>
> The results that I have, now, are quite weird, because:
> 1. the creation of a TeX file from MTX of from PMX work pretty fine
> 2. the final TeX file is compiled without any error
> 3. the final aspect of the compiled TeX file is quite bad, and shows
> all the notes moved on the left side of the systems.
>
> I had this with two different sources: in the case of a text typeset
> with MTX or with PMX, the notes in the final DVI are all at the very
> left of the system, partially overlapped. Instead, compiling one of
> the native tex sample files (taken from the zipped folder of examples)
> I have that the measures are not justified in the system, but are
> left-aligned (and then remains a lot of space on the right). Notes are
> surely readable in this case, but since this left grouping still
> persists in both case, It suggested me that there should be something
> wrong with the MusixTex installation.
>
> I have the DVI's of the examples done coming from the three formats,
> if somebody wants to see them please ask (I do not attach them not to
> bother all the ML).
>
> If somebody could let me know where to look in to understand where the
> problem is, I'd be really happy!
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Carlo
>
>
>
>   

___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Multi-bar rest with fermata sign in scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hi Don,

a very fast answer! Thank you.



> Three comments:
> 1. I notice the fermatas are not properly centered over the rests. I'll
> should work on fixing that.
> 2. You have a fermata on the whole note in bar 4, part 1, but no
> corresponding fermata on the rest in part 2.
> 3. You are using things like "%6" as bar number comments. I'd be worried
> that scor2prt would confuse that with a part-only line. Safer to include a
> space after the "%".
>
> --Don
>
The reason of the item 2 and 3 is that I am a really inattentive guy.

Thank you

Luigi
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[TeX-Music] Multi-bar rest with fermata sign in scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Hi all,

I have a little problem with scor2prt, so this letter is addressed 
particularly to Don.

In the following example there are multiple bars of rest in the superior 
part. The last of those rests comes with a fermata sign.

===
2 2 4 4 4 4 0 0
1 1 20 0


bt
./

%1
c0- | c0 | c0 | c0 of | c0 /
c0 | rp | rp | rp | rp /
%6
c0 | c0 | c0 | c0 of | c0 /
rp | rp | rp | rp of | c0 /
===

scor2prt condenses the rests in the following erroneous way for the part 2:

===
c0 | rp | rp | rp | rp /
%6
rm4 /
of | c0 /
===

So there is the need of a post-edit of the resulting pmx file.
In such a condition I expect an output like " c0 | rm7 | rp of ", i.e. 
all the rests condensed exept the last one that comes with the fermata sign.
Is there a way to solve the problem?

Thanks

Luigi
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-Music] Octave signs

[Luigi Cataldi]

The same happens to me under Linux Debian and dvipdfmx-20050831. On the 
contrary all is ok in the dvi file and in the pdf produced by pdftex, 
dvipdfm, ps2pdf.

Luigi

Jean-Pierre Coulon ha scritto:
> The "raised hyphens" of the octave passage in my test file look correct
> in the .DVI with yap, but when I run dvipdfmx, the "hyphens" are 
> spaced with
> too wide a gap. I work with the MiKTeX distribution.
>
> The .PDF is correct if I make dvips and ps2pdf.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre Coulon  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>
> \input musixtex
>
> \nostartrule
>
> \centerline{k}
> \bigskip
> \startextract
> \Notes\ioctfinup q\ibl1m1\qb1m\tqb1n\en
> \NOtes\zq{gi}\ql d\en
> \Notes\cl m\ds\en
> \NOtes\toctfin\qu c\en
> \NOtes\qu d\en
> \endextract
>
>
> \end
>   
> 
>
> ___
> TeX-music mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>   
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] Bugfix version of scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Sorry if I am here again, but I see now that the compilation with g77 
works well!


Bye

Luigi


___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] Bugfix version of scor2prt

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you so much Don!

I've tested with some my old scores scor2prt and seems that all is ok 
for the precompiled windows version.
I don't want to irritate the list with my linux problem (so you can 
ignore the following part of the letter, if you want!), but I'm ron into 
trouble with the version that I've compiled on my own for my frdora 4 
linux distribution (AMD version).
I've compiled the sources following the instruction present in 
"musixtex-for-unix.pdf", using f2c (version 20031025) and gcc32 (version 
3.2.3).
The compilation ends without error messages and the software works 
apparently well, but I see that, in the preamble, scor2prt puts 0 
instead of the right voice number. A sample.


Premble writed by windows version:
   2
   1
   3
   8
   3
   8
0.00
  -2
   3
  32
  20
0.05

Premble writed by my Unix version:
   0
   1
   3
   8
   3
   8
 .00
  -2
   1
  32
  20
 .05

Any explanation?

Thanks.

Luigi


Don Simons wrote:

I've posted a beta version of scor2prt as a tentative fix to the 
problem Luigi just identified. The fix is very crude and very special 
purpose, in that is specifically looks for the format that M-Tx 
produces for terminal repeats, wherein the last command on one line is 
R[something] and the next line is precisely " /". I'd appreciate it if 
people would test this beta version out on their old scores containing 
terminal repeats.


___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[TeX-music] Little incompatibility between M-Tx - PMX - SCOR2PRT

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,
when a MTX score ends with e double barline ( || ) the resulting PMX 
score is OK. However in the parts the double barline doesn'come on the 
last bar but on the second-last. The problem comes from a carriage 
return in the PMX code produced by MTX. For instance:


% last bottom line (bass) of the MTX code of a score
a4 a- \ccharnote{-9}{\medtype\it {Da Capo}}\ d2- of ||

% resulting lines in the PMX code generated by MTX (note that "/" comes 
on the second line!)

a4 a4- \ccharnote{-9}{\medtype\it {Da Capo}}\ d2- of Rd
/

% the same bar in the extracted part made by SCOR2PRT (note the new 
position of Rd)

Rd
a4 a4- \ccharnote{-9}{\medtype\it {Da Capo}}\ d2- of
/

(You can try to compile the sample at the and of this mail)

Is there a way to avoid this difficulty?

Thanks

Luigi


%
Style: Quintet
Size: 20
Flats: 2
Meter: C
Pages: 1
Systems: 1

% Batt. 51
r2 f1+ g f g f g f g
rp
rp
g1 es d e g b a g a b a b a b a b
es4 r f r

% Batt. 52
f8 a- d f a.g f es
rp
rp
a8 d- f a d8 c1 b a8 g
d1 d d d d d d d d8 es f g

% Batt. 53
d4 cs oT0 d2 of
rp
rp
f4 es d2 of
a4 a- \ccharnote{-9}{\medtype\it {Da Capo}}\ d2- of ||
%

___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] M-Tx questions

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear Don,
probably someone else can answer better than me to your questions. Here 
is what I can say at best of my knowledge.



I'm trying to typeset a Cantata with M-Tx. These questions have come up:

1. The intro and arias have 2 violins, soprano, and BC. I got that set up OK
with 4 staves. But the recits reduce to just soprano+BC. How can I reduce
the number of staves for one of these sections, then increase back to 4 for
the next? 

Of course you can do it with in-line PMX command (%%), but "M-Tx 0.60 is 
not aware of movement breaks and the possibility to change the number of 
voices" (M-Tx manual, p. A-7). In this case M-Tx expects 4 lines of 
music instead of two and aputomagically puts two empty bars for the 
absent lines. The only solution I can imagine is to manually delete 
those lines of rests before to process the files with pmx.
Maybe we can ask to Dirk to implement this feature in the next release 
of M-Tx?



For later sections, how can I apply a centered title, a tempo
marking above the start of the top staff, and an indentation if I want them?
 

All those features are available as in-line PMX command, but, we have to 
keep in mind that M-Tx isn't aware of.



2. M-Tx doesn't interpret "ef-2" or "c2 6 ,f" (in the BC) the same way PMX
does. Are these bugs,  features, or a violations of rules I'm unaware of?
 


M-Tx do not accept "ef-2", but "ef2-" or "e-f2".
M-Tx do not accept the shortcut "c2 6 ,f", but only "c2,f"

For an example I put here a code sended some time ago by Christian, 
modified by me (so the errors are mine and not by Christian!). We can 
see there the effect of the reduction from 4 to two voices inserted with 
PMX in-line command and the incorrect centering of the subtitle when we 
use the "\centerline" TeX command.


%  Christian Mondrup 12/3/2001 
% With mistakes inserted by L. Cataldi 9/8/2006

Title: My title
Composer: My composer
Style: Vls Singer Bass
Vls: Voices Vl1 Vl2; Clefs G G
Singer: Voices S; Vocal; Clefs G
Bass: Voices B; Clefs F
Name: Vl.~1 Vl.~2 Soprano Basso
Space: -2 -2 -2 -2

Meter: C
Pages: 1
Systems: 3

%%h
%%\centerline{Subtitle 1}
g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g |
g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g |
g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g |
g4 g e-f2 | g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g |


%%L2Mn214bt
%%h
%%\centerline{Subtitle 2}
m3434 g2,g | g,g | g,g | g,g |
m3434 g2,g | g,g | g,g | g,g |

%%L3Mn41234batt
%%h
%%\centerline{Subtitle 3}
m4406 g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g |
m4406 g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g |
m4406 g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g | 
m4406 g4 g g g | g g g g | g g g g | g g g g | 





___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] Dvips doesn't find musix16.pfb

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you very much, Christian, for your answer.


Luigi Cataldi wrote:


Dear all,
In my teTeX distribution (fedora core 4 with TeX 3.0) I've installed 
the MusiXTeX type 1 Postscript fonts in the local folder

   /usr/local/share/texmf.
If I use the size of 20 pt all works well (type K postscript slurs 
too). But if I use 16 pt size or with any other musxtex font (i.e. 
musixspx.pfb) DVIPS prints some similar error messages:
   Warning: module writet1 of dvips (file musix16.pfb): glyph 
`.notdef' undefined

   module writet1 (file musix16.pfb): invalid marker

Can I ask your help?



ON my fedora core 4 station I have all .pfb installed in the directory 
/usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/type1/musixtex.


me too.



I've just tested that I can compile a test m-tx file to type1 postscript.

Did you set up local dvips configuration  /usr/local/share/texmf/dvips ?



No. I've thought that the /usr/share/texmf/dvips was enaugh. Now I've 
copied the "config.ps" file in the dit 
"/usr/local/share/texmf/dvips/config" with and without the line "p 
+musix.map", but the results is the same.


Did you follow the instructions in chapter 3, INSTALLATION in the 
README file of 
ftp://sunsite.dk/mirrors/ctan/fonts/musixtex/ps-type1/musixps-unix.tar.gz 
?


Yes, and I've followed (I think so, at least) the indications, exept for 
the rules that are different in TeX 3.0. But, here is my configuration.


In "texmf.cnf" (located in /usr/share/texmf/web2c) I have this line
TEXMFLOCAL = /usr/local/share/texmf

Musixtex fonts are in the dir. "/usr/local/share/texmf/fonts" and the ps 
music fonts in sub-dir. "type1/musixtex"
I've located "musix.map" file in the dir. 
"/usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/musix" and than I've add to the 
file "/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg" this line:

"Map /usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/musix/musix.map"
Then I've run updmap (without options). The program creates the new map 
files and exit without errors (you can see the log file at the end of 
this message).
The very strange thing, in my opinion is, why dvips finds only 
musix20.pfb (and slur-ps font) and not the others.


Bye

Luigi


*
dom gen  8 17:00:05 CET 2006
updmap: This is updmap, version 1107552857
updmap: using transcript file `/usr/share/texmf-var/web2c/updmap.log'

updmap is creating new map files using the following configuration:

 config file: `/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg'
 dvips output directory: `/usr/share/texmf-var/fonts/map/dvips/updmap'
 pdftex output directory: `/usr/share/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap'
 dvipdfm output directory: `/usr/share/texmf-var/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap'

 prefer outlines: `true'
 texhash enabled: `false'
 download standard fonts (dvips): `false'
 download standard fonts (pdftex): `true'
 download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `true'

updmap: Scanning for LW35 support files
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/dvips35.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map'
updmap: using map file 
`/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/dvipdfm35.map'

updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ps2pk35.map'

updmap: Scanning for MixedMap entries:
updmap: using map file 
`/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/bsr-interpolated.map'

updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/bsr.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/cc-pl/ccpl.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/misc/cs.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/misc/eurosym.map'
updmap: using map file 
`/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/hoekwater.map'

updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/pl/pl.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ttcmex.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/vntex/vnr.map'

updmap: Scanning for Map entries:
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/antp/antp.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/psnfss/charter.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/misc/cmcyr.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/contnav.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/antt/cork-antt.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/cork-lm.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/antt/cs-antt.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/misc/dstroke.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/antt/exp-antt.map'
updmap: using map file `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/psnfss/fpls

[TeX-music] Dvips doesn't find musix16.pfb

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,
In my teTeX distribution (fedora core 4 with TeX 3.0) I've installed the 
MusiXTeX type 1 Postscript fonts in the local folder

   /usr/local/share/texmf.
If I use the size of 20 pt all works well (type K postscript slurs too). 
But if I use 16 pt size or with any other musxtex font (i.e. 
musixspx.pfb) DVIPS prints some similar error messages:
   Warning: module writet1 of dvips (file musix16.pfb): glyph `.notdef' 
undefined

   module writet1 (file musix16.pfb): invalid marker

Can I ask your help?

___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[TeX-music] Problems with grace notes in PMX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,
in the following PMX code I have two problems.

Bar 1, upper staff.
There is a group of two grace notes (32th) followed by a single one 
grace note. The single one is overlapped on the main note.


Bar 3, middle staff.
The group of two grace notes (32th) is overlapped to the barline.

Where is my mistakes? Is there a way to solve those problems?

Thanks in advance

Luigi Cataldi

% - %
3 3 3 4 3 4 0 -3
1 1 16 0.0



bat
./

B
ArbeI.95
% bar 1
r1 b1- df1 f1  b4  g4  /
\turn{15}\ dfd2+  s  /
a4++ s gd8 s f1 GA2m3en f Gf bd8 b1  /
% bar 2
r1 c1-- es1 g1  c4  df4  /
d4 s cd8 b1 Gb ad8 g1  /
( b4 \Shakel{12}\ esd8- ) e1 Ge fd8 e1  /
% bar 3
r1 f1- a1 c1  f4  a4-  /
a4 om s  ad8 s c1 Gsc fd8 e1 GAs2lm3df c /
f4  r4 r4  /
% bar 4
r1 b1 df1 f1  b4  d4-  /
X2 Gc dfd2  sAt  /
r4 r8 r1 f1  bd8 a1 GAs2lm3g f  /
% bar 5
r1 e1 g1 b1  e4  r1 g1- f1 e1  /
d4  sAt sBt  dd8 sBt c1  b4  s  /
Gf g4  s  gd8 s a1  Ge df4  s  /
% - %

___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[TeX-music] PMX compilation for Linux

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,

I've just turn my back on Windows for Linux and I'm in trouble with my 
best preferred software: PMX of course. G77 compiler isn't present in my 
Fedora core 4 distribution and I wasn't able install it (a problem with 
the gcc compiler version that I can't solve). So I used gfortran 
compiler that comes with fedora distribution. I've followed the 
instructions for this purpose and I have no compilation errors but when 
I use the softwares I have 2 problems:


1. pmxab (2508) works fine as musixtex generator, but produces wrong 
midi files

2. scor2prt (version 2501) doesent work with the following  error message:

   At line 323 of file scor2prt.for
   Fortran runtime error: Read past ENDFILE record

I am very inesperienced, I know, but there is a way to solve the 
problem? It's possible that the question was discussing some time ago 
... I'm sorry.


P.S. In a desperation moment I have found that windows PMX.EXE works 
fine with Wine emulator!


Regards

Luigi
___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] Barnumbers

[Luigi Cataldi]

H. Hinsch wrote:
Am Freitag November 26 2004 23:07 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 

I invite proposals for an alternate style for bar numbers. I could make it
an "A" option in PMX. Please provide a PMX input snippet with in-line TeX
to illustrate your proposal. There could even be more than one alternate
style. I don't think this would be very hard to implement in PMX.
--Don Simons
   

This would be a very good option.
I used the following redefintion (which I found in a score of the archive but 
forgot the author) to set barnumbers as italics

\\def\writebarno{\ifnum\barno>1\lrlap{\tenrm\it\the\barno\barnoadd}\fi}\
\\def\raisebarno{5mm}\
Hermann Hinsch
 

Thank you Don for your invitation. I support Hermann's  proposal too, 
but with the font oldstyle (\oldstyle) instead of  "\tenrm" (CMR10 I 
suppose). Here is my in-line TeX commands:

\def\writebarno{\ifnum\barno>1\lrlap{\oldstyle\the\barno\barnoadd}\fi}%
\def\shiftbarno{3.5\Interligne}
\def\raisebarno{2.2\Interligne}
Luigi
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] Two figured bass line in PMX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Thank you very much Don!
I'll wait for this function.
My interest for those strange pieces is essentially musicological: the 
violin sonata influence on the keyboard music after Corelli. As far I 
know there are no other works of this kind. But I think that it's 
possible to find two figured bass line in works for double choir, like 
the "Dixit Dominus" RV594 by Vivaldi (if I remember well).
About your proposal to play togeter, I should be happy, but it's just a 
dream for me: I play (if we can say to play in this case) keyboard in an 
horrible manner :-(

Have a nice time!
Don Simons ha scritto:
When I saw the subject line I immediately thought about Pasquini and those
strange pieces. Are there any other works with two parallel lines of figured
bass? Sometime in the last decade I set out to typeset some of them, and I
made a special version of PMX to do it. I did get the process working but
never got very far with the typesetting. I can't think of any good way to do
it in the current PMX. If you have some patience, I'll try to find the old
special version and integrate the capability into modern PMX. It'll be a
good spare-time project for my long-awaited vacation starting this Thursday,
most of which I'll spend playing harpsichord and visiting old friends at the
International Baroque Institute at Longy in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Then
when you finish the typesetting, we can get together and play them :-)
--Don Simons
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[TeX-music] Two figured bass line in PMX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all,
I have to typeset in PMX a figured bass sonata by Pasquini for two 
harpsichords, that requires two figured bass lines. Is there a way to 
put the figures not only in the lowest voice but in the upper too? I 
know that the manual says no. So, here is a second question: what is the 
better way to insert a second figured bass line?

Thanks
Luigi Cataldi
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [TeX-music] First steps with MusiXTeX

[Luigi Cataldi]

Rodolfo Medina ha scritto:
Hi, everybody.
I'm completely new to MusiXTeX.
I have Linux Mandrake 9.1 on my PC.
I see the installation of MusiXTeX is quite difficult.
I downloaded 'musixtex-T112.tar' and unzipped it,
but I don't manage to generate the fonts when I try to process some of
Taupin's examples,
like kv315f.tex,
neither when I open some of the dvi files, like musixdoc.dvi.
When I try to copy the tfm files into the directory
...texmf/fonts/tfm/public/musictex,
Linux denies me the permissions.
Neither with MikTeX I manage to generate the fonts when I open musixdoc.dvi.
I'm desperate!
Please, could someone show me the simplest way to install MusiXTeX and make
it work on my PC?
Thanks in advance,
		Rodolfo Medina
 

Hi Rodolfo,
have you see the "Howto install MusiXTeX, PMX and M-Tx" for Unix by 
Christian Mondrup? If not the address is

http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-unix.html
I strongly suggest to you the use of PMX and/or M-Tx preprocessors. You 
can find an italian tutorial too for those programs at the address

http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/lcgpmx.pdf
Ciao
Luigi Cataldi
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

[TeX-music] scor2prt problem: %% after ---

[Luigi Cataldi]

Dear all and expetially dear Don,

today I found a strange behavior of scor2prt. I see that if  %% come 
just at the end of type type four in line tex command (---), when I run 
scor2prt for the extraction of the parts I have an error. Sometime, like 
in the sample belove, from my edition of the violin sonata by Zipoli, 
not that and the following, but that and line after the following are 
ignored by scor2prt. I know that ther's no reason to put there a comment 
line and that this solves the problem, but I'm wondering about the 
correct running of the program.

If the problem is unfounded, please excuse me.

Luigi Cataldi

== sample from Zipoli's violin sonata
---
\let\:=\relax\input musixtex\:\sepbarrules\input pmx
\input musixbar\input curly\input vlfr
\def\writebarno{\ifnum\barno>1\lrlap{\tenrm\the\barno\barnoadd}\fi}%
\def\shiftbarno{3.5\Interligne}
%\def\mymetron#1#2{\smallnotesize\metron{#1}{#2 1}}
\def\mymetron#1#2{\smallnotesize\metron{#1}{#2 1}}
\font\tit = cmr10 scaled \magstep 5
\font\rxii = cmr12
\font\data = cmr10
\font\nota = cmr8
\font\mov = ecbi10 scaled \magstep 1
\def\titolo{\tit Sonata per violino e continuo}
\def\compA{\rightline{\rxii Domenico Zipoli}}
\def\compB{\rightline{\data (1688--1726)}}
---
%
% number of staffs
3
% total number of voices
3
% logical timesig numerator
4
% logical timesig denominator
4
% drawn timesig numerator
0
% drawn timesig denominator
6
% beats in anacrusis bar
0
% sharps (+ve) or flats (-ve) in key
2
% number of pages, or zero
10
% number of systems, or measures per system
40
% point size (16 or 20)
20
% indentation of first line, as decimal fraction
0.09
 The rest is in the archive
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] trios on 6/8 mesure, how many beams ?

[Luigi Cataldi]

I learned from my young age that a group of notes could be superabundant 
(italian: sovrabbondanti) or insufficient (it: insufficienti). In your 
sample the group in the second bar is superabundat (4 instead of 3 quarter 
note), whilst the group in the thrid bar is insufficient (4 instead of 6 
eight note). I can't undertand why one indication should be correct and the 
other wrong.

Luigi

At 07.22 05/02/04, you wrote:
I have here a discussion with (real) musiciens, who asked me to type some
music. I followed the default shape of
Don's pmx but they critize the number of beams on trios. They say the 3th
mesure on the example (commented with "wrong?" must have a beam. I known
that Don (always) is right but i put the question here to collect arguments
in the heavy discussion we have.
So comments are welcome

=
1 1  6  8  6  8  0  0
1 220   .0
t
./
Ap
AT
%1
b44 b b /
%2
b24dx4 D"right?" a g fs /
%3
[m1 b24dx4n6 D"wrong?" a g fs ] /
%4
b4dx2 b bd /
%5
b4x3 b b b2 /
%6
b4dx4 b b b bd /
%
m4848
b24x3 b b /
b84 a g fs /
b8 b b4 /
b4x3 b b b4 /
b8x3 b b b4d /
b4x4 b b b b /
===
thanks
Andre


___
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music