Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] External USB memory - how?
Tks for all the tips so far! Waldo Pepper;602258 Wrote: > They do however do a program free on their website that allows you to do > a full format, merge these partitions and get rid of their proprietry > programs. Could you pls be a bit more specific on this? Where can I find it? Tks! -- psch41 psch41's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42452 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84726 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
Flextreme;602875 Wrote: > You know that I enjoy your mod. > > My blind test execution was most certainly not perfect, and I (wrongly) > did expect to easily identify your mod in this test. I am just sharing > my own experience, and I can only be truthful about it. Apart from > this, I am clearly impressed in the other 'subjective' tests and very > vocal about it. Do you think I am spreading FUD in the process? You can try this, just for a lark: get an audiophile friend who'd be willing to humor you, ask jim to help you with a double-blindfold ABX test. Tell him that you'd be randomly switching some audio components and asking him if he can detect any differences. Sit him down, blindfold him, and run the ABX tests. Play the track you've agreed upon beforehand, the pretend that you're messing around with something, play the same track again, and so forth. Each time you play the track, ask him to tell you if it sounds different or not to him. The clincher is to NEVER change absolutely anything. You'll see that your friend will nevertheless start detecting some differences from playback to playback. People never fail to fall into the trap of 'expectation bias'. That fact alone completely disqualifies the 'objectivity' of a double-blind ABX test. -- magiccarpetride magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] A Quick Question about Album Cover
No takers? Rgds Patrick -- souwalker souwalker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37673 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84804 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] ALAC native support on Touch
MikeSB;602873 Wrote: > I have seen some discussion on this elsewhere but I'm not sure if I have > seen a definitive answer. > > I understand that ALAC is supported natively on the Touch. At least if > I connect a USB drive which contains some ALAC files to the Touch, the > SB server on the Touch plays them. > > However when I play an ALAC using the SB sever on my Mac Mini the file > seems to get transcoded to FLAC. If I go to "More info" for the track > it says something like "Bitrate: 850kbps VBR (converted to 705 kbps > FLAC)." Also there doesn't seem to be an option in "File Types" in > Settings to set Apple Lossless to "native". I have a Boom pointing at > the same server and was wondering whether the fact that the Boom cannot > play ALAC natively meant the server was transcoding to FLAC. However my > Boom is switched off and is not synced with the Touch. > > Is there any way of getting SBS on my Mac to play ALAC natively? > > Mike You might be able to make adjustments to the convert.conf file to enable native playback. This will only work if you do not have any older generation squeezebox players as they will not be able to playback correctly. This is probably why SBS defaults to transcoding to FLAC. Because ALAC and FLAC are both lossless, there is no harm in this behavior. -- SuperQ SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84823 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Why can't I save radio stations to favorites??
Ocean56;602881 Wrote: > That could be it. > > So if I save a favorite on the SB, I need to be DISCONNECTED from > mysb.com on my PC? You have two favorite lists one on the local server and one on mysqueezebox.com . However depending on squeezeboxserver version you could have a favorite on your local server named "On mysqueezebox.com" this is a link to your mysqueezebox favorite list , this also means that the integration between local server and mysqueezebox.com must be on and the log in details given to the server in the settings, this will also give you all the apps and services via the local server too, so you only have to switch server if you turn of the PC . -- Mnyb Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH and assorted amps SiriuS, Classe' Primare and Dynadio speakers, Contour 4 Contour Center, and Contour 1.3SE rear ch. Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: SB3 + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) PLEASE FIX BUG 112 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112 Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84820 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Why can't I save radio stations to favorites??
That could be it. So if I save a favorite on the SB, I need to be DISCONNECTED from mysb.com on my PC? -- Ocean56 Ocean56's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40734 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84820 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
You know that I enjoy your mod. My blind test execution was most certainly not perfect, and I (wrongly) did expect to easily identify your mod in this test. I am just sharing my own experience, and I can only be truthful about it. Do you think I am spreading FUD in the process? -- Flextreme Flextreme's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42996 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
[SlimDevices: Touch] ALAC native support on Touch
I have seen some discussion on this elsewhere but I'm not sure if I have seen a definitive answer. I understand that ALAC is supported natively on the Touch. At least if I connect a USB drive which contains some ALAC files to the Touch, the SB server on the Touch plays them. However when I play an ALAC using the SB sever on my Mac Mini the file seems to get transcoded to FLAC. If I go to "More info" for the track it says something like "Bitrate: 850kbps VBR (converted to 705 kbps FLAC)." Also there doesn't seem to be an option in "File Types" in Settings to set Apple Lossless to "native". I have a Boom pointing at the same server and was wondering whether the fact that the Boom cannot play ALAC natively meant the server was transcoding to FLAC. However my Boom is switched off and is not synced with the Touch. Is there any way of getting SBS on my Mac to play ALAC natively? Mike -- MikeSB MikeSB's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3334 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84823 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Why can't I save radio stations to favorites??
Any chance you are switching between servers when you are saving to Favorites? Saving a Favorite while the player is connected to SBS on your computer will not be shown as a Favorite if you connect your player to MySB.com online. -- toby10 toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84820 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
Flextreme. You're outlining pretty inconstant conclusions. That's the weired thing. You seem to try to apologize for your "subjective" findings. You pretty much confirm what Guido is saying, tough you call it subjective (though I guess nobody told you what expect), on the other hand you stress yourself heavily with questionable ABX testing. And finally you conclude better to wait for the great master to tell you that everything is nonsense. Believe me you're not the only one having that "subjective" feeling, I'm receiving quite some mails everyday. As I say on the blog: The impact on any audio chain you'll experience ( with any change) will differ from system to system, grade of implementation, from person to person, from track to track, from room to room, from time to time, from mood to mood, from preoccupation to preoccupation, from agenda to agenda, from selective perception!!! to selective perception, asf asf. Selective perception I consider one of the key elements. You need to know what to look for. Otherwise it's gonna be and stays a subjective feeling. In my opinion it is impossible to finally conclude anything about the subject. Because results will always be different. What one can conclude about though will be a certain tendency. One thing you can bet on: I don't intend to make myself look like a fool. I put quite some effort into it. The toolbox went on quite some different system before going public. I even presented in on a DIY fair last October. Of course I do listen very closely to other then FUD feedback. You guys enjoy & trust your own ears. -- soundcheck 'soundcheck's audio@vise - Squeezebox Touch Toolbox 2.0' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com/2011/01/soundchecks-squeezebox-touch-toolbox-20.html) soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34383 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Problem connecting LaCie HDD to Touch
Stoneage;602716 Wrote: > I've just bought a Squeezebox Touch and am not able to connect my 320 gb > Lacie HDD to the device. Can anyone provide any advice on what to try > next? > > I have reformatted the drive to NTFS (it was originally formated for a > Mac). Now it recognises the drive but after scanning the music library > shows as empty. > > The compatability list provided by Logitech seems to include this drive > as one that should work. I would buy a replacement drive if I was sure > that would work but am disinclined to do so right away as that may not > work either. > > This is frustrating - having the USB connectability was the main reason > I bought the Touch. I already have 2 other Squeezeboxes but I have > problems with wireless drop out and rebuffering which drive me mad. 2 questions 1. Is the drive bus powered or does it have its own power supply? 2. What format is your music in? -- m1abrams m1abrams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=850 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84807 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
[SlimDevices: Touch] Why can't I save radio stations to favorites??
Example...I want to save WDET HD2 to my favorites on the Squeezebox. I search for it, hold down on it when I find it, and get the menu letting me add it to my favorites. But it's not on the My Favorites list when I go back into that! AND I've successfully added 2 other stations! As much as I LOVE this device, the documentation and some of the how-to-do whatever directions are LACKING. So what am I doing wrong? Or am I missing something? -- Ocean56 Ocean56's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40734 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84820 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
The first thing I noticed when I tried soundcheck's mods was that the music was louder. Presumably there's no big secret here, because I had previously been using replaygain adjustment (SmartGain) and had the Touch's volume setting around 92% (I use the analog outs). As per soundcheck's instructions (item 1 in section 1.1.2) I turned the Touch's volume to 100% and turned off replaygain. Of course, turning the gain down on my amp was all that was needed to get to previous volume levels. My question: why should replaygain on/off make a difference in audio quality, besides the obvious effects of perceived loudness? Isn't the gain adjustment taking place on the server? I'm still evaluating the change in sound quality from the mods. My first reaction is that I may be hearing some more detail, but I need to do more listening with and without the mods. In any event, it finally motivated me to finish running some cat5e to my living room! -- aubuti aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
bluegaspode;602779 Wrote: > Hi Flextreme, > According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABX_test) 10 out > of 16 times right missed the 95% confidence level, so still could be a > result just by chance. I think this is a fair statement. 10 out of 16 is far from conclusive, like I explained, it was difficult identifying the mod in the blind A/B test (which was extra difficult because of the 20 second delay.) Phil Leigh;602782 Wrote: > I'm working on it. > > Doing an a/b listening test is very hard because the 20 second reboot > delay exceeds the aural memory window (by about 19 seconds!). > > Really you need 2 synced touches side-by-side to do this properly and > to get anything like meaningful results. > Completely agree, this is exactly what I stated in my previous post. I am looking forward to your findings. guidof;602813 Wrote: > Flextreme: > > Thanks for providing the details of your comparisons. > > My impression (from comparing different speaker orientations, > admittedly a very different condition from your A/B trials) is that > listening to a variety of musical samples over extended periods of time > is essential for subjective differences to be perceived, regardless of > the judgment of whether such differences may be improvements or not. > When I used short (5 minute) samples of the same music, I could not > discern differences unless they were really gross. > > My *-very subjective-* impression of soundcheck's mods *-in my system-* > (see below) is that the improvements (with FLAC decoded to PCM on the > server, in/outputs defeated, except digital, and screen off, but no > WLAN defeated) are not at all subtle when one listens over time to a > variety of recordings of various music genres. One of the parameters > that is most apparent is in the clarity of vocals, whereas previously > obscure words become understandable. A similar effect is noticeable > among different instruments in complex musical passages. Another effect > is that differences among recordings become more apparent. The overall > effect is greater 'musicality,' by which I mean what I hear is closer > to hearing a live, rather than a recorded, performance -- though, of > course, one is still aware one is listening to a recording, not to the > real thing! > > Again, these are *-subjective-* impressions, and by no means do they > suggest that your comparisons or Phil Leighs's attempts at measurements > are not valid. > > Guido F. Again, I tend to agree completely what you are saying: when I just started listening to music when the Touch was modded (without analyzing SQ to death), many times I was struck by new insights, scale and drive of the music, I was sucked into the recording, more so before the mod. You describe exactly what my 'subjective' experience was. Good to see that everyone understands that I'm not trying to impose my truth or whatever: it's more of an personal journey then anything else. -- Flextreme Flextreme's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42996 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
Flextreme: Thanks for providing the details of your comparisons. My impression (from comparing different speaker orientations, admittedly a very different condition from your A/B trials) is that listening to a variety of musical samples over extended periods of time is essential for subjective differences to be perceived, regardless of the judgment of whether such differences may be improvements or not. When I used short (5 minute) samples of the same music, I could not discern differences unless they were really gross. My *-very subjective-* impression of soundcheck's mods *-in my system-* (see below) is that the improvements (with FLAC decoded to PCM on the server, in/outputs defeated, except digital, and screen off, but no WLAN defeated) are not at all subtle when one listens over time to a variety of recordings of various music genres. One of the parameters that is most apparent is in the clarity of vocals, whereas previously obscure words become understandable. A similar effect is noticeable among different instruments in complex musical passages. Another effect is that differences among recordings become more apparent. The overall effect is greater 'musicality,' by which I mean what I hear is closer to hearing a live, rather than a recorded, performance -- though, of course, one is still aware one is listening to a recording, not to the real thing! Again, these are *-subjective-* impressions, and by no means do they suggest that your comparisons or Phil Leighs's attempts at measurements are not valid. Guido F. -- guidof *Front End*: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge; Cambridge Azur 840C CD Player; Oppo BDP--83 Universal Player; Squeezebox Touch Music File Player (digital out to Cambridge Azur 840C DAC) *Preamps*: Conrad Johnson Motif (Phono); Adcom GFP-750 (Line) *Amps*: Music Reference RM-200 Mk II (Main); Little Tube Mk III (Phones) *Subwoofer Equalizer*: DSpeaker Antimode 8033 *Speakers*: Martin Logan SL3s; REL T1 Subwoofer *Headphones*: AKG K701 guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
I'm working on it. Doing an a/b listening test is very hard because the 20 second reboot delay exceeds the aural memory window (by about 19 seconds!). Really you need 2 synced touches side-by-side to do this properly and to get anything like meaningful results. As for the ADM tests... they are coming along nicely. Analogue output tests are done, I need to do the s/pdif tests. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
Flextreme;602673 Wrote: > Out of 16, I got 10 times right. Hi Flextreme, thanks a lot for the first results which can be trusted and are not bound alone to expectations by the listeners. According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABX_test) 10 out of 16 times right missed the 95% confidence level, so still could be a result just by chance. Don't want to play down your results though - but this definitely (in your setup and with your ears) shows (as you write), that the mods are far away from the big audible differences most users and the author of the mods claim. Anyway - if people feel better after doing the mods (be it because their minds plays tricks with them or because there are really audible changes) then I don't want to stop them believing in it :D. Now Phil Leighs results are still interesting. Thanks again for taking the time to do these test and sharing the results! -- bluegaspode Big Screen for great Boxes available now at your AppStore: *'Squeezebox + iPad = SqueezePad ' (www.squeezepad.com)* - -now featuring streaming to iPad!- Want to see a Weather Forecast on your Radio/Touch/Controller ? => why not try my 'Weather Forecast Applet' (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73827) Want to use the Headphones with your Controller ? => why not try my 'Headphone Switcher Applet' (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67139) Setup: 1x SB-Controller+Receiver (Duet), 1xSB-Boom. 2xSB-Radio Server (7.5.1) running on SheevaPlug (Ubuntu) with attached Western Digital MyBook Essential. bluegaspode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31651 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0
I have a SB Touch (org. PSU) > Coax > Supernait (Hicapped) > NACA5 >
Harbeth SuperHL5
Just to explain: with 'subjectively' I meant that I know when the
modded touch is playing in the comparisons. With objectively I meant
that I do not know what I am hearing. This is probably not the right
choice of wording. :)
I listened for first 1-3 minutes to either Philip Glass, Primacy of a
number from Naqoikatsi and Agnes obel, Just so.
In the comparisons, I run the Touch (both modded and default) connected
to ethernet and with flac decoded on the server to PCM. The mods include
all software mods on the device. Buffer is set to 4400us. All
inputs/outputs are disabled except the digital-out of course. Both
switching to ethernet and server flac decoding do not change the SQ in
my system in my perception, but I stick with it because it does not
hurt SQ either. Server side FLAC decoding once did make a clear
difference on the SB3, but that was only with one specific release of
slimserver/firmware. I stuck with it anyhow, as my own best practice.
Because of the 20 second boot-time after randomizing the "tt-e" or
"tt-d", and the subtle difference, it is quite difficult to identify if
the Touch is played modded. (I put a cloth over the touch, so I could
not see if the mod was effective, and initiated a simple randomized
AutoIT script running on my PC from my iPad through an RDP session).
However, I also compared the a SB3 (connected through wi-fi) and the
(either default/modded Touch). Comparisons are easy, when you switch
players the difference is immediately apparent. ('subjectively', I now
know when I hearing the modded Touch). Especially that the soundstage
is 'one notch' larger and detail improvement is striking.
On my Supernait the unmodded Touch is consistently similar to the SB3.
This is probably due to the reclocking nature of the Supernait.
However, directly A/B-ing the modded Touch to my SB3, the difference is
significant in my perception. This is aligned with the wow-effect I had,
first time I heard the mod.
Doing a true blind, A/B test with 2 Touch players (one modded and the
other not) would very probably make comparisons much easier, because
you can switch directly, making the difference much easier to
distinguish.
In my professional life, I publish independent performance research
white papers of virtualization technologies, which are heavily
scrutinized by both the IT community and the major vendors. Mayby this
explains why I put so much effort in analyzing the mod. Whatever, I am
finished analyzing, and will go back to enjoying music.
--
Flextreme
Flextreme's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42996
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742
___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Problem with buffering
Jokke;602744 Wrote: > Have a look at this bug too : > http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16750 Note that I was using 7.6 with SQLite and eventually "fixed" my dB with the help of the devs , over at bug http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15361. :) On TinySB aboard the Touch , would a simple thing to try be to delete the whole directory created by the server I don't know it's name but when the server scans it puts it results in a folder preceded with a dot "." on the USB drive , if you got some kind of dB corruption it migth not be enough to do a completer rescan but deleting the whole thing might be needed. Trying to get the sqlite3 tool going inside the touch can be an exercise, if you really like to tinker... -- Mnyb Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH and assorted amps SiriuS, Classe' Primare and Dynadio speakers, Contour 4 Contour Center, and Contour 1.3SE rear ch. Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: SB3 + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) PLEASE FIX BUG 112 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112 Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84612 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Problem with buffering
Have a look at this bug too : http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16750 -- Jokke Jokke's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84612 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] High-res downloads in CANADA?
aln;602683 Wrote: > K..I just want to add this if that can help anyone from Canada. As i've > posted earlier i was able to download high-res files from linn and also > from AIX RECORDS. Now just tryed to register with pandora but failed. My > question is: is there a "way" to register with pandora or similar sites > from Canada? Thanx. AL. May or may not work, but try changing your location on MySB.com > Settings to US. -- toby10 toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84399 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
[SlimDevices: Touch] Problem connecting LaCie HDD to Touch
I've just bought a Squeezebox Touch and am not able to connect my 320 gb Lacie HDD to the device. Can anyone provide any advice on what to try next? I have reformatted the drive to NTFS (it was originally formated for a Mac). Now it recognises the drive but after scanning the music library shows as empty. The compatability list provided by Logitech seems to include this drive as one that should work. I would buy a replacement drive if I was sure that would work but am disinclined to do so right away as that may not work either. This is frustrating - having the USB connectability was the main reason I bought the Touch. I already have 2 other Squeezeboxes but I have problems with wireless drop out and rebuffering which drive me mad. -- Stoneage Stoneage's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29877 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84807 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
