Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees/'baptIZed'

2003-12-13 Thread ttxpress



so, how didsuch a baptism 
becomean 'administrative sacrament'?

gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com 



On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:48:02 -0600 
"ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Acts 22:16'Now why do you 
  delay? Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on His 
  name.'


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees/'baptIZed'

2003-12-12 Thread ShieldsFamily









g, have you ever been baptized? If you dont
want to reveal the answer to this question, please just say so. Izzy



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003
10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees/'baptIZed'





what's a sacrament? how does 'baptized' fall into that category?











On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:48:21 -0600 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





YesI assume you have heard of the word? Have you
been? Yes  or No__ Izzy

baptized

Baptize
\Bap*tize\, v. t. [imp.  p. p. Baptized; p. pr.  vb. n. Baptizing.] [F. baptiser, L.
baptizare, fr.Gr. ?. See Baptism.] 1. To administer the
sacrament of baptism to.

2. To christen ( because a name is given to infants at their baptism); to give
a name to; to name. 

3. To sanctify; to consecrate.





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003
6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees





'baptized'? 











On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:59:56 -0600 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





g, I am still waiting to hearwere you ever baptized?
Izzy



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003
3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees





Does anybody
here (on TT)believe thatthe Trees lit bya Bushare 'pagan'?











If no/t,
wouldyou prefer to concludethatthe Bush is 'pagan'?






gary ottoson :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com (--fyi,
new poetry posted:)











On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:













so,people
aren't 'pagan' (or 'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no wonder some people'd rather climb a
flag pole..would you
consider the Trees 'pagan' that the Bushs lit?













On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:









In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:29:57 PM Central Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:







'pagan' = 'wrong'? 















no but if they think a tree is pagan and it
bothers them then don't fool with it! Laura
























gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com










gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com










gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com








Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees/'baptIZed'

2003-12-12 Thread ttxpress



you're pretty smart, i guess

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:05:42 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  I suspected that you would be 
  cagey about answering this question, g. That speaks for itself. 
  Izzy
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:21 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas 
  Trees/'baptIZed'
  
  1. To administer the 
  sacrament of baptism to[='baptized']. 
  
  
  
  Whatdoesit 
  mean (to you), Izzy?
  
  --
  
  On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:10:27 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
g, have you 
ever been baptized?..

-Original 
Message-From: 
TruthTalk.. On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||

what's a sacrament? how 
does 'baptized' fall into that category?||
  gary ottoson :: 
http://poet235.com


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees/'baptIZed'

2003-12-12 Thread ShieldsFamily









Acts 22:16'Now
why do you delay? Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on
His name.'



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
 December 12, 2003 5:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees/'baptIZed'





you're pretty smart, i guess











On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:05:42 -0600
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:





I suspected that you would be cagey about answering this
question, g. That speaks for itself. Izzy



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
 December 12, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees/'baptIZed'



1. To administer
the sacrament of baptism to[='baptized']. 









Whatdoesit mean (to you),
Izzy?



--





On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:10:27 -0600
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:





g, have you ever been baptized?..



-Original Message-
From: TruthTalk.. On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

||



what's a sacrament? how does 'baptized' fall into that category?
||














gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com








Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-11 Thread ttxpress



Does anybody here 
(on TT)believe thatthe Trees lit bya Bushare 
'pagan'?

If no/t, wouldyou 
prefer to concludethatthe Bush is 
'pagan'?
gary ottoson :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com 
(--fyi, new poetry posted:)

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  so,people 
  aren't 'pagan' (or 'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no 
  wonder some people'd rather climb a flag pole..would you consider the 
  Trees 'pagan' that the Bushs lit?
  
  
  On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:29:57 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  'pagan' = 
  'wrong'? 
  
no but if they think a tree is pagan and it bothers them 
then don't fool with it! Laura

  gary ottoson :: 
http://poet235.com


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-11 Thread ShieldsFamily









g, I am still waiting to hearwere you ever baptized? Izzy



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003
3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees





Does anybody
here (on TT)believe thatthe Trees lit bya Bushare 'pagan'?











If no/t,
wouldyou prefer to concludethatthe Bush is 'pagan'?






gary ottoson :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com (--fyi,
new poetry posted:)











On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:













so,people
aren't 'pagan' (or 'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no wonder some people'd rather climb a
flag pole..would you
consider the Trees 'pagan' that the Bushs lit?













On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:









In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:29:57 PM Central Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:







'pagan' = 'wrong'? 















no but if they think a tree is pagan and it
bothers them then don't fool with it! Laura
























gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com








Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-11 Thread ttxpress



'baptized'? 


On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:59:56 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  g, I am still waiting to hearwere 
  you ever baptized? Izzy
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:45 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees
  
  
  Does 
  anybody here (on TT)believe thatthe Trees lit bya 
  Bushare 'pagan'?
  
  
  
  If no/t, 
  wouldyou prefer to concludethatthe Bush is 
  'pagan'?
  
  gary ottoson 
  :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com 
  (--fyi, new poetry posted:)
  
  
  
  On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 -0700 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  



so,people 
aren't 'pagan' (or 
'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no wonder some 
people'd rather climb a flag pole..would you consider the Trees 
'pagan' that 
the Bushs lit?




On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  
  In a message dated 12/9/2003 
  6:29:57 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  

'pagan' = 
'wrong'? 



  
  no but if they 
  think a tree is pagan and it bothers them then don't fool with it! 
  Laura
  
  



  gary ottoson :: 
  http://poet235.com
  gary ottoson :: 
http://poet235.com


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-11 Thread ShieldsFamily









YesI assume you have heard of the word? Have you
been? Yes  or No__ Izzy

baptized

Baptize
\Bap*tize\, v. t. [imp.  p. p. Baptized; p. pr.  vb. n. Baptizing.] [F. baptiser, L. baptizare,
fr.Gr. ?. See Baptism.] 1. To administer the
sacrament of baptism to.

2. To christen ( because a name is given to infants at their baptism); to give
a name to; to name. 

3. To sanctify; to consecrate.





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003
6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees





'baptized'? 











On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:59:56 -0600 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





g, I am still waiting to hearwere you ever baptized?
Izzy



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003
3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees





Does anybody
here (on TT)believe thatthe Trees lit bya Bushare 'pagan'?











If no/t,
wouldyou prefer to concludethatthe Bush is 'pagan'?






gary ottoson :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com (--fyi,
new poetry posted:)











On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:













so,people
aren't 'pagan' (or 'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no wonder some people'd rather climb a
flag pole..would you
consider the Trees 'pagan' that the Bushs lit?













On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:









In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:29:57 PM Central Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:







'pagan' = 'wrong'? 















no but if they think a tree is pagan and it
bothers them then don't fool with it! Laura
























gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com










gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com








Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees/'baptIZed'

2003-12-11 Thread ttxpress



what's a sacrament? how does 'baptized' fall into 
that category?

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:48:21 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  YesI assume you have heard of the 
  word? Have you been? Yes  or No__ Izzy
  baptized
  Baptize \Bap*tize"\, v. t. [imp.  p. p. Baptized; p. pr. 
   vb. n. Baptizing.] [F. 
  baptiser, L. baptizare, fr.Gr. ?. See Baptism.] 1. To 
  administer the sacrament of baptism to.2. To christen ( because a name 
  is given to infants at their baptism); to give a name to; to name. 3. 
  To sanctify; to consecrate.
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:41 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas 
  Trees
  
  
  'baptized'? 

  
  
  
  On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:59:56 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
g, I am still waiting to 
hearwere you ever baptized? Izzy

-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:45 
PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees


Does 
anybody here (on TT)believe thatthe Trees lit bya 
Bushare 'pagan'?



If no/t, 
wouldyou prefer to concludethatthe Bush is 
'pagan'?

gary 
ottoson :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com 
(--fyi, new poetry posted:)



On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 
-0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  
  
  so,people 
  aren't 
  'pagan' (or 
  'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no wonder some 
  people'd rather climb a flag pole..would you consider the Trees 
  'pagan' that 
  the Bushs lit?
  
  
  
  
  On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 
  EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


In a message dated 12/9/2003 
6:29:57 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  'pagan' = 
  'wrong'? 
  
  
  

no but if they 
think a tree is pagan and it bothers them then don't fool with it! 
Laura


  
  
  
gary ottoson :: 
http://poet235.com


  gary ottoson :: 
  http://poet235.com
  gary ottoson :: 
http://poet235.com


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-10 Thread ttxpress




so,people 
aren't 'pagan' (or 'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no 
wonder some people'd rather climb a flag pole..would you consider the Trees 
'pagan' that the Bushs lit?


On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:29:57 PM Central Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
'pagan' = 
'wrong'? 

  no but if they think a tree is pagan and it bothers them then 
  don't fool with it! Laura
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-09 Thread ttxpress




'pagan' = 
'wrong'? 

how so? 


On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:00:09 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
Do you really think that what is |pagan| for some may not be |pagan| for others??? 
YES

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:15:01 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  ..if a person thinks it is |wrong| for them then so be 
it!


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-08 Thread ttxpress





On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:00:09 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
Do you really think that what 
is pagan for some may not be pagan for others??? 
YES
Hey 
Laura--if it ain't 'pagan' for Bush, for whom is the Tree 
'pagan'??
(Hey 
Marlin--Where are you when the Tree's are bein' lit--if not dinin' 
withDean, then out Christmas shoppin'?What's the 
problem,Bush won't let youclimb the Tree??)
gary 
ottoson :: http://poet235.com


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-08 Thread ttxpress



(ibetDean and 
DavidM havean idea who you could ask..tell him the person who throws the 
light switch onisAC-DC)

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:53:21 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  ..(Hey Marlin..What's the problem,Bush won't let 
  youclimb[his] Tree??)
  


  gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-08 Thread LaurHamm



In a message dated 12/8/2003 6:55:13 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Hey Laura--if it ain't 'pagan' for Bush, for whom is the Tree 'pagan'??
(Hey Marlin--Where are you when the Tree's are bein' lit--if not dinin' withDean, then out Christmas shoppin'?What's the problem,Bush won't let youclimb the Tree??)
It "ain't" pagan for me! I put 1800 lights on the tree today and my son thinks I need more!!!I do cover a lot of the lights with little clear stars. That's a Christian symbol right The girls played with the nativity sets while I worked. They act out the story. At one point the youngest brought over a couple of carolers from the end table and set them in the manger too.Her sister said that there had to be people there because the town was crowded and someone else had to come by. Interesting thought through the eyes of a 5 yr old. 


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-08 Thread ttxpress



got it; for whom is it 
'pagan', then?

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:42:30 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
 It "ain't" pagan 
  for me!


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-08 Thread ttxpress




(one more 
time:)

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:00:09 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
Do you really think that what 
is pagan for some may not be pagan for others??? 
YES
...


On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:42:30 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
 It "ain't" pagan 
  for me!

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:53:53 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  got it; for whom is 
  it 'pagan', then, 
[Laura]?


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas trees

2003-12-07 Thread David Miller
Marlin wrote:
 So, while I am not convinced that Christmas trees, 
 or celebrating Christmas on Dec 25th for that matter, 
 are pagan/sinful practices, I'm willing to hear
 Marlin out as often as he wants to discuss it.  
 To me, it's one of those scripturally 
 not-specifically-spelled-out situations.

One problem is that Marlin, like many on this issue, does not discuss
the matter.  He simply states his position and lists all manner of links
and the writings of others to make his case.  The information he
presents is full of holes, and when these problems were pointed out last
year, there was little or no response.  Now he presents the same old
arguments all over again as if it has not already been discussed.  He
even presents the same Scriptures.

If someone wants to discuss Christmas trees, that would be fine, but to
just blast shotguns of information upon people who celebrate Christmas
produces no good fruit as far as I can see. It seems to me that he just
does not celebrate Christmas and has some kind of chip on his shoulder
toward those who do.  Maybe he is upset that Christmas is more
celebrated in our culture than the Jewish moedim.  This seems to be the
same problem with those of us who give greater honor to observing the
Lord's Day of resurrection rather than the Jewish Sabbath on Saturnday.
:-)

Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas trees

2003-12-07 Thread Marlin Halverson
I did not write that, Izzy did.

- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas trees


 Marlin wrote:
  So, while I am not convinced that Christmas trees,
  or celebrating Christmas on Dec 25th for that matter,
  are pagan/sinful practices, I'm willing to hear
  Marlin out as often as he wants to discuss it.
  To me, it's one of those scripturally
  not-specifically-spelled-out situations.

 One problem is that Marlin, like many on this issue, does not discuss
 the matter.  He simply states his position and lists all manner of links
 and the writings of others to make his case.  The information he
 presents is full of holes, and when these problems were pointed out last
 year, there was little or no response.  Now he presents the same old
 arguments all over again as if it has not already been discussed.  He
 even presents the same Scriptures.

 If someone wants to discuss Christmas trees, that would be fine, but to
 just blast shotguns of information upon people who celebrate Christmas
 produces no good fruit as far as I can see. It seems to me that he just
 does not celebrate Christmas and has some kind of chip on his shoulder
 toward those who do.  Maybe he is upset that Christmas is more
 celebrated in our culture than the Jewish moedim.  This seems to be the
 same problem with those of us who give greater honor to observing the
 Lord's Day of resurrection rather than the Jewish Sabbath on Saturnday.
 :-)

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-07 Thread David Miller
Marlin wrote:
 I did not write that, Izzy did.

Sorry about that Marlin.  Yes, Izzy wrote what was quoted.  I meant to
write Izzy but I was thinking ahead about you so I accidentally wrote
Marlin.  I guess my typing hands went on auto pilot.  Sorry about
that.

Also, I want to apologize for saying that you won't discuss this matter.
This post here certainly does, but in the past you have not discussed
it. I came across a little hard and I am sorry for that.  I hope you
understand that I prefer discussion over throwing lots of reading
material at us.  

David Miller wrote:
 Say what? Are you trying to say that I am a false 
 Christ because I claim that Jesus is the Christ?

Marlin wrote:
 I do not know whether Jesus was referring to you or not.  
 That is between you and Him.  I merely believe what Jesus 
 said about those who would use his name after His departure 
 to heaven.  
 ... MAT 24:5 {For many shall come in my name, saying, 
 I am Christ; and shall deceive many.}

But what seems odd in what you wrote was that they would say that Jesus
is the Christ, and then at the same time say that they are the Christ.
The false Christs, the ones coming bearing his name as their own, do not
say that Jesus is the Christ, do they?  

Marlin wrote:
 Why do the many wish to learn the way of the heathen 
 in order to remember Jesus?  The scripture says 
 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the 
 heathen. [JER 10:2] 

Clearly this Word was spoken to Israel concerning the heathen nations
which cut down trees and built false gods out of them.  This in no way
corresponds to Gentiles celebrating Christmas, the birth of Jesus
Christ.  The similarity of trees being involved is no more compelling to
your argument than if they were building a house out of the trees and
you were against building houses out of trees.

Marlin wrote: 
 Jesus did leave a record of something to do in 
 remembrance of Him.  It had nothing to do with 
 cutting down trees or celebrating his birth.  
 It instead focuses upon the tree upon which He 
 was hung, upon His death, and upon His resurrection, 
 His earnest desire to keep the Passover with His 
 disciples, and His ascension to the Father on the 
 wave sheaf day.

But you make it sound like one substitutes Christmas for the Eucharist.
That is not at all what happens.  In fact, many churches celebrate the
Eucharist on Christmas Eve. They are not mutually exclusive
celebrations.

Hanukah was not a divinely commanded celebration.  Do you think Hanukah
is wrong because it was not something which Jesus commanded?  Isn't it
true that Jesus celebrated Hanukah?  Doesn't that suggest that Jesus was
not against celebrating holidays that were not commanded through divine
revelation? If the people of their own accord, by their own hearts of
thanksgiving and praise to their Creator celebrate his birth and all
that he has given us, what is that to you? Why would you oppose it?  Why
would God oppose it?

Marlin wrote:
 I'll take the real remembrance over a counterfeit any day.  

What do you mean, real remembrance over a counterfeit?  What is the
real remembrance of his birth? Do you or anybody else know?

Marlin wrote:
 If any man asks, I will tell them of the real 
 remembrance, and not a counterfeit.  

Well then, tell us.  What is the real remembrance of which you speak?

Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-07 Thread Marlin Halverson




  David M.: But what seems odd in 
  what you wrote was that they would say that Jesusis the Christ, and then 
  at the same time say that they are the Christ.The false Christs, the ones 
  coming bearing his name as their own, do notsay that Jesus is the Christ, 
  do they? 
Marlin: Yes there are two categories 
here. 
1) Those saying that He is the Christ. Note 
the definite article "the," and what follows, the manydeceive many by 
saying He is the Christ. 
2) False Christs. Note the plural 
nature of the word Christs.
 a) Some teach fake Christs 
instead of the real Christ, counterfeits that look like the genuine
 b) Somepersonify 
saviors,and "shew great signs and wonders," and get followings after 
themselves instead of leading others to the true Christ. This type of the 
false Christscould refer back to the many who deceive the many by saying 
He is the Christ.


  David M.: Clearly 
  this Word was spoken to Israel concerning the heathen nationswhich cut 
  down trees and built false gods out of them. This in no 
  waycorresponds to Gentiles celebrating Christmas, the birth of 
  JesusChrist. The similarity of trees being involved is no more 
  compelling toyour argument than if they were building a house out of the 
  trees andyou were against building houses out of 
  trees.
Marlin: You presume to be a Gentile. In the 
early Church, those Gentiles who turned to God did notidentify with their 
past heritage or ways. They repented. Notice:

  Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto 
  these dumb idols, even as ye were led. 1CO 12:2 
  And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye arethe 
  temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell inthem, and 
  walk in [them]; and I will be their God, and they shallbe my 
  people. 2CO 6:16 For they themselves shew of us 
  what manner of entering in we had unto you, and how ye turned to God from 
  idols to serve the living and true God; 1TH 1:9 
  Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen. 1JO 
  5:21 
They turned from their idolatrous ways. 


  David M.: But you 
  make it sound like one substitutes Christmas for the Eucharist.That is not 
  at all what happens. In fact, many churches celebrate theEucharist 
  on Christmas Eve. They are not mutually 
  exclusivecelebrations.
I make no such sound. All those counterfiets 
are not the genuine truth.

  David M.: Hanukah was not a divinely commanded celebration. 
  
Marlin: True. It is not commanded. It 
is Jewish tradition. It is something foreign to me.


  David M.: 
  What do you mean, "real remembrance" over a counterfeit? What is 
  thereal remembrance of his birth? Do you or anybody else 
  know?.Well then, tell us. What is the real remembrance of which 
  you speak?
Marlin: The real remembrance is in the holy days 
and Sabbaths that God commanded to be kept as memorials. These are the 
days that men reject infavor of fables. Notice:

  And they shall turn away [their] ears from the 
  truth, and shall be turned unto fables. 2TI 4:4
  Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and 
  commandments of men, that turn from the truth. TIT 1:14
  For we have not followed cunningly devised 
  fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus 
  Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. 2PE 
1:16


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-06 Thread ShieldsFamily








Laura, 



Can we hold off on the discussion of nativity sets until we
have resolved this Christmas tree issue first? Do you really think that what
is pagan for some may not be pagan for others??? Isnt this a classic
example of humanistic moral relativism? The main question is not what someone feels is pagan.
(God doesnt really care about our feelings when judgment day arrives,
does He?) The question should be, I think, what does the Lord say is pagan? Can we discuss it from that angle? Ideas,
anyone? How do we discover whether or not the Lord considers having a Christmas
tree is an ungodly practice from the Lords point of view? Marlin has
brought up this issue several times, and I think it would be a good thing to
discuss as a group. 



Izzy



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003
11:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: [TruthTalk]
Christmas Trees





Below is more from the site Marlin recommended.
Note that it also mentions the fruitlike tree from the garden of Eden.
Interesting that it is also mentioned in the article I posted. Personally
I think that if someone feels a Christmas Tree is pagan and if it doesn't
represent the symbols associated with Christmas then it is wrong
for them to have a tree. I like the tree as a symbol and the lights and
ornaments and other decorations. In no way am I intending to put down
Marlin. My intent is only to point out that what is pagan for some may
not be pagan for others.











Question: Would any of you consider Nativity
sets idols? Just curious. Laura


















During the Middle Ages, the Germans believed the evergreen trees were
especially imbued with life since they remained green throughout all of winter.
Greenery was prominent in pagan winter celebrations in honour of the tree
spirit or spirit of fertility.

The Romans trimmed the trees with trinkets and toys at that time of year. The
Druids tied gilded apples to tree branches. For many, a tree decorated with
orbs and fruit-like object symbolised the tree of life in the garden of Eden.










Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-06 Thread Marlin Halverson




The song goes:

Oh Christmas tree, oh Christmas tree,how lovely are thy 
branches ...
Men seem to want to idolize the creation or 
themselves. This is the basis for everyholiday that men 
havedevised in opposition to the holy days and sabbaths that God 
created.

God gives those who love not the truth over to strong 
delusion. [2TH 2:11] The biblical evidence clearly shows that 
Jesus was born in the Fall, not in the dead of winter. 
Furthermore,the celebration of birthdays is actually foreign to the people 
of God. The scripture shows that there would be false Christs,even 
those who claim that Jesus is the Christ, and yet would deceive many. John 
writes that "...no lie is of the truth." 1JO 2:21The truth cannot come out of a lie. It ought to be asked: "Who 
changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature 
more than the Creator...?" ROM 1:25

  There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the 
  end thereof [are] the ways of death. PRO 14:12 
  There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the 
  end thereof [are] the ways of death. PRO 16:25 

John admonishes us: "Little children, keep 
yourselves from idols. Amen." 1JO 5:21 

For those who do not care for the truth: 
"Have yourself a Merry Little 
Christmas..."

But the truth of God, both bitter and sweet, 
fulfills. With Jesus; the Truth, Way and Life; as our daily bread, 
our bread of life, we are promissed eternal life. That "evergreen 
tree" that you cut down for one holiday is going to die.

Love, 

Marlin

  P.S.: Thus saith the 
  LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of 
  heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the 
  people [are] vain: for [one] cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the 
  hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and 
  with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. 
  They [are] upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, 
  because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, 
  neither also [is it] in them to do good. Forasmuch as [there 
  is] none like unto thee, O LORD; thou [art] great, and thy name [is] great in 
  might.  Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it 
  appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise [men] of the nations, and in all 
  their kingdoms, [there is] none like unto thee. But they are 
  altogether brutish and foolish: the stock [is] a doctrine of vanities. 
  JER 10:2-8 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 11:14 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas 
  Trees
  
  
  Laura, 
  
  Can we hold off on the discussion 
  of nativity sets until we have resolved this Christmas tree issue first? Do 
  you really think that “what is pagan for some may not be pagan for others??? 
  Isn’t this a classic example of humanistic moral relativism? The main question 
  is not what someone “feels” is 
  pagan. (God doesn’t really care about our feelings when judgment day 
  arrives, does He?) The question should be, I think, what does the Lord say is pagan? Can we discuss it 
  from that angle? Ideas, anyone? How do we discover whether or not the Lord 
  considers having a Christmas tree is an ungodly practice from the Lord’s point 
  of view? Marlin has brought up this issue several times, and I think it would 
  be a good thing to discuss as a group. 
  
  Izzy
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:50 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Fwd: [TruthTalk] Christmas 
  Trees
  
  
  Below is more from the site Marlin 
  recommended. Note that it also mentions the fruitlike tree from the 
  garden of Eden. Interesting that it is also mentioned in the article I 
  posted. Personally I think that if someone feels a Christmas Tree is 
  pagan and if it doesn't represent the "symbols" associated with Christmas then 
  it is wrong for them to have a tree. I like the tree as a symbol and the 
  lights and ornaments and other decorations. In no way am I intending to 
  put down Marlin. My intent is only to point out that what is pagan for 
  some may not be pagan for others.
  
  
  
  Question: Would any of you 
  consider Nativity sets idols? Just curious. 
  Laura
  
  
  
  
  
  During the Middle Ages, the 
  Germans believed the evergreen trees were especially imbued with life since 
  they remained green throughout all of winter. Greenery was prominent in pagan 
  winter celebrations in honour of the tree spirit or spirit of 
  fertility.The Romans trimmed the trees with trinkets and toys at that 
  time of year. The Druids tied gilded apples to tree branches. For many, a tree 
  decorated with orbs and fruit-like object symbolised the tree of life in the 
  garden of Eden.


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-06 Thread David Miller
Marlin wrote:
 Men seem to want to idolize the creation or themselves.  
 This is the basis for every holiday that men have devised 
 in opposition to the holy days and sabbaths that God created.
 God gives those who love not the truth over to strong delusion.
 ... the celebration of birthdays is actually foreign to the 
 people of God.  

Bah humbug.  We have seen this spirit of Scrooge before. What good thing
comes from it?

Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and
unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is
defiled. (Titus 1:15 KJV)

I'm looking forward to celebrating Christ's birth this year. It is a
wonderful time with the family.  I have a 13 foot Christmas tree all
decked out with lights and ornaments in my living room.  We will
exchange presents on Christmas day and tell about Jesus and his birth
and spread the joy of Christ around.  Praise the Lord.  Many
opportunities will arise to speak to others about Jesus Christ during
this wonderful holiday. Songs of glory and praise will be made unto
Jesus in public places and door to door. Glory be to God in the highest
for this opportunity to preach Christ to the world.  The atheists and
secular humanists are trying to outlaw Christmas and many Messianics
join them, but they will not prevail because Jesus is the Christ and
mere men cannot stamp out the Spirit of Christ. Jesus is Lord of the
Christians and the secularists.  As long as believers in Christ have
breath, we will declare his birth, his ministry, his death, his
resurrection, and the judgment to come.

Marlin wrote:
 The scripture shows that there would be false Christs, 
 even those who claim that Jesus is the Christ, and yet 
 would deceive many.

You say that there would be false Christs who claim that Jesus is the
Christ and yet would deceive many? Say what? Are you trying to say that
I am a false Christ because I claim that Jesus is the Christ?

Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


[TruthTalk] Christmas trees

2003-12-06 Thread Bruce Woodford
Hi Izzy,

You wrote:Do you really think that what is pagan for some may not be pagan 
for others??? Isn't this a classic example of humanistic moral relativism? 
The main question is not what someone feels is pagan. (God doesn't really 
care about our feelings when judgment day arrives, does He?) The question 
should be, I think, what does the Lord  say is pagan? Can we discuss it from 
that angle? Ideas, anyone? How do we discover whether or not the Lord 
considers having a Christmas tree is an ungodly practice from the Lord's 
point of view? Marlin has brought up  this issue several times, and I think 
it would be a good thing to discuss as  a group.

Could I suggest that consideration of scripture is always wise when seeking 
to deal with such questions?

One example that comes to mind is I Cor.8. From that background, one could 
ask the question: Does God consider eating meat offered to idols as 
idolatry/pagan?

Can eating meat offered to idols be sinful for one person and absolutely 
righteous for another?  I believe that it can!

Is it then possible that the same sort of principle could be applied to 
having a Christmas tree?
If one Christian views it as sinful or is stumbled by it,  is it sin for him 
to have one?

But for another who knows that an evergreen tree is nothing but an evergreen 
tree, can it be perfectly righteous for him to have one and decorate it?

Another example is the observance of days in Romans 14.  Can it be sinful 
for one man to esteem  one day above another?  On the other hand, can it be 
sinful for another man to observe every day alike?

In other words, if the Holy Spirit has convicted me that it would be sinful 
for me to do a certain thing (which scripture does not specificly say is 
sinful) can I rightfully teach others that it is sinful for everyone to do 
that thing which scripture does not specificly say is sinful?

Do these passages shed any light on the issue of Christian's and their views 
of Christmas trees?

Your brother in Christ,
Bruce
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought 
to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas trees

2003-12-06 Thread ShieldsFamily
Hi Bruce, 

It's so good to hear from you again! I think you have made a good point
about Christmas trees.  Rom 14 shows us clearly that, although some things
are not innately sinful in themselves, if one does not have a clear
conscience about it, you just should not do it.  And we shouldn't go around
judging each other in areas that are not absolutely clear in scripture.  

On the other hand, there are certainly some things that are totally
forbidden by the Lord (such as idolatry, or joining in pagan rituals.  Mardi
Gras comes to mind as I type this.)  In such instances we dare not think we
should go by our feelings, but should sincerely search out God's word and
obey it, no matter how we feel about it. 

 I am sure that most of us who are Protestants have inherited certain
polluted practices from the fallen Roman Catholic church that we came out
of.  (Imagine that concept!)  So when someone as sincere as Marlin is so
convicted about something, I like to at least take him seriously enough to
investigate the issue myself, having an open mind and a
willing-to-be-corrected spirit. I know this drives many folks a bit fruity,
but I'm more willing to be convicted of being wrong than I am willing to be
convicted of being callous to the Holy Spirit's correction. And you never
know where that might come from.  Sometimes it just comes directly from the
Holy Spirit, and sometimes He uses an intermediary. 

So, while I am not convinced that Christmas trees, or celebrating Christmas
on Dec 25th for that matter, are pagan/sinful practices, I'm willing to hear
Marlin out as often as he wants to discuss it.  To me, it's one of those
scripturally not-specifically-spelled-out situations.  

Does that drive you nuts, or what?
Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Woodford
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 10:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Christmas trees

Hi Izzy,

You wrote:Do you really think that what is pagan for some may not be pagan

for others??? Isn't this a classic example of humanistic moral relativism? 
The main question is not what someone feels is pagan. (God doesn't really 
care about our feelings when judgment day arrives, does He?) The question 
should be, I think, what does the Lord  say is pagan? Can we discuss it from

that angle? Ideas, anyone? How do we discover whether or not the Lord 
considers having a Christmas tree is an ungodly practice from the Lord's 
point of view? Marlin has brought up  this issue several times, and I think 
it would be a good thing to discuss as  a group.

Could I suggest that consideration of scripture is always wise when seeking 
to deal with such questions?

One example that comes to mind is I Cor.8. From that background, one could 
ask the question: Does God consider eating meat offered to idols as 
idolatry/pagan?

Can eating meat offered to idols be sinful for one person and absolutely 
righteous for another?  I believe that it can!

Is it then possible that the same sort of principle could be applied to 
having a Christmas tree?
If one Christian views it as sinful or is stumbled by it,  is it sin for him

to have one?

But for another who knows that an evergreen tree is nothing but an evergreen

tree, can it be perfectly righteous for him to have one and decorate it?

Another example is the observance of days in Romans 14.  Can it be sinful 
for one man to esteem  one day above another?  On the other hand, can it be 
sinful for another man to observe every day alike?

In other words, if the Holy Spirit has convicted me that it would be sinful 
for me to do a certain thing (which scripture does not specificly say is 
sinful) can I rightfully teach others that it is sinful for everyone to do 
that thing which scripture does not specificly say is sinful?

Do these passages shed any light on the issue of Christian's and their views

of Christmas trees?

Your brother in Christ,
Bruce

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-05 Thread Marlin Halverson



http://members.iinet.net.au/~gregga/hebrew/xmastree.html

  The Pagan Origin of The Christmas Tree
  The concept of the Christmas Tree originated around 3000 B.C. in ancient 
  Egypt with King Osiris and Queen Isis.After the untimely death of King 
  Osiris, his wife, Isis, propogated the demonic doctrine of the survival of 
  Osiris as a spirit. She claimed a full grown evergreen tree sprang overnight 
  from a dead stump, symbolising the new life of the Osiris spirit from his 
  death. On each anniversary of Osiris birth, which was the date we now know as 
  December 25th, Isis would leave gifts around this 
tree.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:22 
  AM
  Subject: [TruthTalk] Christmas 
Trees
  
  I remember last year we had a big thread 
  about Christmas trees. I came across this while planning my calendar for 
  Parents Day Out and thought it was interesting. Laura 
  
  
  The tradition of decorating the 
  Paradeisbaum, or Paradise trees, originated in 
  Europe. Christians would celebrate the holiday on Christmas Eve by acting out 
  important events in Scripture. One of the skits that was performed was the 
  'The Garden of Eden' scene. Since it was the wintertime in Europe it was not 
  possible to find an apple tree with apples, so an evergreen tree would be 
  substituted. The actors first hung apples on their "Paradise Trees", later 
  adding other adornments such as dried fruits and nuts. 
  The increase in popularity of the 
  Paradeisbaum is attributed to Martin Luther. It is believed that he first 
  added lighted candles to his Paradise Tree after walking home through the 
  woods one winter evening. He was in the midst of composing a sermon and was 
  awestruck by the brilliance of the millions of twinkling stars above the 
  evergreens. So inspired by the beauty of God's creation, he cut down an 
  evergreen and brought it home to his family, then wired lighted candles to the 
  tree to recreate the starlit scene. Paradise trees eventually became 
  known as 'Christ Trees', then Christmas Trees. It is believed that Christmas 
  trees were brought to America by Germans that immigrated to Pennsylvania. The 
  diary of Matthew Zahm of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, records the introduction of 
  the Christmas tree being brought to the New World December 20, 1821. 
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-05 Thread LaurHamm

Yikes Marlin, I was just trying to give another perspective. We went the pagan route last year. Why not try another approach this year! LOL Laura


RE: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-05 Thread ShieldsFamily








Laura, I would like to hear you disprove what Marlin
says rather than just laugh it off. If it is possible that this is true,
then shouldnt we all look into the ramifications? Do you know it not to
be true? Even if it is true, does that automatically mean that the Lord
disproves of us having Christmas trees today? Is it possible that we could be
doing something that seems like an innocuous tradition that is really offensive
to the Lord? Is that not possible? This seems like a relevant issue
worthy of discussion. If we have a brother who is disturbed enough about this
to warn us, shouldnt we be kind enough to discuss this issue rather than
just ridicule him? I know you have a kind heart, Laura. So what do you think? Izzy



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003
8:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas
Trees



Yikes Marlin, I was just trying to give another
perspective. We went the pagan route last year. Why not try another
approach this year! LOL Laura








Fwd: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

2003-12-05 Thread LaurHamm


Below is more from the site Marlin recommended. Note that it also mentions the fruitlike tree from the garden of Eden. Interesting that it is also mentioned in the article I posted. Personally I think that if someone feels a Christmas Tree is pagan and if it doesn't represent the "symbols" associated with Christmas then it is wrong for them to have a tree. I like the tree as a symbol and the lights and ornaments and other decorations. In no way am I intending to put down Marlin. My intent is only to point out that what is pagan for some may not be pagan for others.

Question: Would any of you consider Nativity sets idols? Just curious. Laura


During the Middle Ages, the Germans believed the evergreen trees were especially imbued with life since they remained green throughout all of winter. Greenery was prominent in pagan winter celebrations in honour of the tree spirit or spirit of fertility.The Romans trimmed the trees with trinkets and toys at that time of year. The Druids tied gilded apples to tree branches. For many, a tree decorated with orbs and fruit-like object symbolised the tree of life in the garden of Eden.
---BeginMessage---



http://members.iinet.net.au/~gregga/hebrew/xmastree.html

  The Pagan Origin of The Christmas Tree
  The concept of the Christmas Tree originated around 3000 B.C. in ancient 
  Egypt with King Osiris and Queen Isis.After the untimely death of King 
  Osiris, his wife, Isis, propogated the demonic doctrine of the survival of 
  Osiris as a spirit. She claimed a full grown evergreen tree sprang overnight 
  from a dead stump, symbolising the new life of the Osiris spirit from his 
  death. On each anniversary of Osiris birth, which was the date we now know as 
  December 25th, Isis would leave gifts around this 
tree.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:22 
  AM
  Subject: [TruthTalk] Christmas 
Trees
  
  I remember last year we had a big thread 
  about Christmas trees. I came across this while planning my calendar for 
  Parents Day Out and thought it was interesting. Laura 
  
  
  The tradition of decorating the 
  Paradeisbaum, or Paradise trees, originated in 
  Europe. Christians would celebrate the holiday on Christmas Eve by acting out 
  important events in Scripture. One of the skits that was performed was the 
  'The Garden of Eden' scene. Since it was the wintertime in Europe it was not 
  possible to find an apple tree with apples, so an evergreen tree would be 
  substituted. The actors first hung apples on their "Paradise Trees", later 
  adding other adornments such as dried fruits and nuts. 
  The increase in popularity of the 
  Paradeisbaum is attributed to Martin Luther. It is believed that he first 
  added lighted candles to his Paradise Tree after walking home through the 
  woods one winter evening. He was in the midst of composing a sermon and was 
  awestruck by the brilliance of the millions of twinkling stars above the 
  evergreens. So inspired by the beauty of God's creation, he cut down an 
  evergreen and brought it home to his family, then wired lighted candles to the 
  tree to recreate the starlit scene. Paradise trees eventually became 
  known as 'Christ Trees', then Christmas Trees. It is believed that Christmas 
  trees were brought to America by Germans that immigrated to Pennsylvania. The 
  diary of Matthew Zahm of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, records the introduction of 
  the Christmas tree being brought to the New World December 20, 1821. 
  
---End Message---