RE: [U2] Sacred Licence Seat - A Challenge
It's in the UV account and in the data account. My test program is written in VB6 using UniObjects against an UniVerse v10.1.11 account. But I still get no results. Jef -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker Sent: Friday, 24 August 2007 10:47 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Sacred Licence Seat - A Challenge Put it in the UV account. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef Lee Sent: Friday, 24 August 2007 2:46 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Sacred Licence Seat - A Challenge Sara, How do I set up the UVCS.LOGIN paragraph? I don't have one on my system to use as a template. I have searched the UV PDF documentation and Googled for UVCS.LOGIN but found nothing helpful. I tried this: CT VOC UVCS.LOGIN UVCS.LOGIN 0001 PA 0002 JEFLOGIN 0003 END: But it didn't run the JEFLOGIN program, so I assume this VOC paragraph was not run either. Thanks, Jeffrey Lee Senior Analyst/Programmer IT Vision Australia Pty Ltd (ABN: 34 309 336 904) PO Box 881, Canning Bridge WA 6153 Level 3, Kirin Centre, 15 Ogilvie Road, Applecross, WA, 6153 P: (08) 9315 7000F: (08) 9315 7088 W: http://www.itvision.com.au ___ NOTICE : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorised review, use, alteration, disclosure or distribution of this e-mail (including any attachments) by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender as soon as possible by return e-mail and then delete both messages. ___ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Binary data corruption on copy
Louie Bergsagel skrev: What do you mean by 50 different filesystems? 50 directory / Type 19 files? On unix machines you split each disk into up to a handfull partitions called filesystems wich may be mounted ( made accessible) individually. -- mats --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
Bounce notice: If you read this list through Indexfocus, Nabble, or any other replicator - and you would like to be able to participate - sign up directly with us. Here's all you need to know: To subscribe or resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: MACK ANDREW, MR [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all I am setting up a new UV production server. UV 10.1.18 on Windows Server 2003, INFORMATION flavour. Access is via QVTTerm. On the existing prod server, when you enter your enterprise login ID at the server login, UV up cases the login ID and presents it to the UV.LOGINS file. However, on the new server it is changing the login ID to lower case. Since all our apps expect upper case, this is very frustrating. For example, on the existing server I login as auser14 and a Who at TCL shows KIWI\AUSER14. UV.LOGINS is: Record Key :AUSER14 001 DOMAIN:KIWI 002 LOCAL : 003 DOMAIN.ACCOUNT :D:\DATA\USERS 004 LOCAL.ACCOUNT : 005 DESC :Andrew Mack End of record On the new server. I login as auser14 and a Who at TCL shows KIWI\auser14. If I login as AUSER14, a Who at TCL shows KIWI\auser14. I have to have UV.LOGINS records in both AUSER14 and auser14 otherwise it falls over with the error Unable to find user account information in the UV.LOGINS file. Could someone please advise what setting determines the case that UV works with? Thank you Andrew Mack Senior Database Manager (UV/SQL) Joint Applications Engineering Group 342 5914 (Dtln) (04) 2371 914 (DDI) The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
Andrew,
Add PTERM CASE NOINVERT to your UV.LOGIN in the UV account:
LOGTO UV
ED VOC UV.LOGIN
4 lines long.
: P
0001: Paragraph
0002: IF @TTY = 'phantom' THEN GO END.OF.LOGIN
0003: PTERM CASE NOINVERT
0004: END.OF.LOGIN:
Bottom at line 4.
hth,
Dave Taylor
CEO
Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
49 Aspen Way
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
(O) 310-544-1974
(C) 310-561-5200
(F) 310-377-3550
www.sysmarkinfo.com
Your Source for Integrated EDI Translation, DataSync Integration and
Software Migration
Authorized IBM Business Partner
- Original Message -
From: Moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; MACK ANDREW, MR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 6:45 AM
Subject: [SPAM] [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
Bounce notice: If you read this list through Indexfocus, Nabble, or any
other
replicator - and you would like to be able to participate - sign up
directly with us. Here's all you need to know: To subscribe or
resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/.
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: MACK ANDREW, MR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
I am setting up a new UV production server. UV 10.1.18 on Windows Server
2003, INFORMATION flavour. Access is via QVTTerm. On the existing prod
server, when you enter your enterprise login ID at the server login, UV
up cases the login ID and presents it to the UV.LOGINS file. However, on
the new server it is changing the login ID to lower case. Since all our
apps expect upper case, this is very frustrating.
For example, on the existing server I login as auser14 and a Who at TCL
shows KIWI\AUSER14. UV.LOGINS is:
Record Key:AUSER14
001 DOMAIN:KIWI
002 LOCAL :
003 DOMAIN.ACCOUNT :D:\DATA\USERS
004 LOCAL.ACCOUNT :
005 DESC :Andrew Mack
End of record
On the new server. I login as auser14 and a Who at TCL shows
KIWI\auser14. If I login as AUSER14, a Who at TCL shows KIWI\auser14. I
have to have UV.LOGINS records in both AUSER14 and auser14 otherwise it
falls over with the error Unable to find user account information in
the UV.LOGINS file.
Could someone please advise what setting determines the case that UV
works with?
Thank you
Andrew Mack
Senior Database Manager (UV/SQL)
Joint Applications Engineering Group
342 5914 (Dtln)
(04) 2371 914 (DDI)
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence
Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName. The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER. I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is' The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could 500 names in the list. My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL' into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute, and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed' for the sort. My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this! Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a 'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record? Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!) David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] CN=Asvin DATTANI/OU=IBEU/O=HSBC is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 24/08/2007 and will not return until 03/09/2007. - SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT! This transmission has been issued by a member of the HSBC Group HSBC for the information of the addressee only and should not be reproduced and/or distributed to any other person. Each page attached hereto must be read in conjunction with any disclaimer which forms part of it. Unless otherwise stated, this transmission is neither an offer nor the solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase any investment. Its contents are based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but HSBC makes no representation and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its completeness or accuracy. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [ud] convsecu
Does anybody have any information on the binary file included with Unidata called convsecu, and what should be done after it is run? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
Hmm...doing it programmatically...multi-dimensional array? DAVINCI,LEONARDO Doe,John Jesse,Sally becomes [1] [2] DAVINCI,LEONARDO DAVINCI,LEONARDO Doe,John DOE,JOHN Raphael,Sally RAPHAEL,SALLY And then you can sort by [2], but display [1]? That way it just stays in memory and the data stored in the database remains the same? On 8/24/07, David Wolverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName. The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER. I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is' The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could 500 names in the list. My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL' into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute, and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed' for the sort. My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this! Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a 'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record? Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!) David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
I was just concerned about this record, as names get added individually -- I thought about doing an UPCASE on a memory version of the MultiValue list, but once that list gets to having 100 or 200 names on it, would the 'hit' for doing an UPCASE on an in-memory version be 'less than' the disk-access time for the larger item... Falls into the 'is there a better way' category of thinking. Like I said -- D3 has sorting WAY better than U2 in this area. (*Just* this one area, but in this case, it's all I'm talking about! g) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jjuser ud2 Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... Hmm...doing it programmatically...multi-dimensional array? DAVINCI,LEONARDO Doe,John Jesse,Sally becomes [1] [2] DAVINCI,LEONARDO DAVINCI,LEONARDO Doe,John DOE,JOHN Raphael,Sally RAPHAEL,SALLY And then you can sort by [2], but display [1]? That way it just stays in memory and the data stored in the database remains the same? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
Duplicating data in the way you suggest is something I detest! The chance of
mis-typing the name the second time is just too great and then there is all
that extra disk space consumed.
I would prefer to see the names, as typed, stored in one attribute. I would
then use a virtual field (is that the right term in Unidata?) to extract the
data in upper case. I am more familiar with Universe, and the corresponding
data definition and I-descriptor would look like this:
ED DICT TEST.UV NAME.INPUT NAME.SORT
SELECTed record name = NAME.INPUT.
6 lines long.
: P
0001: D
0002: 1
0003:
0004: Name (as input)
0005: 30L
0006: M
Bottom at line 6.
: N
SELECTed record name = NAME.SORT.
This is a Type I Descriptor last compiled on 08/24/07 at 17:12.
20 lines long.
: P7
0001: I
0002: SUBR('-OCONVS',NAME.INPUT,'MCU')
0003:
0004: Name (for sorting)
0005: 30L
0006: M
0007:
: X
I'm sure there must be an equivalent in Unidata and someone smarter than I
can explain it better.
Derek Falkner
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: August 24, 2007 1:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName.
The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are
ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER.
I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is'
The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could
500 names in the list.
My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL
CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL'
into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute,
and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed'
for the sort.
My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this!
Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a
'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record?
Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I
miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!)
David W.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
I don't know if it's the same in UD, but in UV I'd just create a extra DICT item with an MCU in the output convert field, sort on that, but display the original. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:51 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName. The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER. I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is' The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could 500 names in the list. My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL' into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute, and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed' for the sort. My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this! Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a 'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record? Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!) David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material not intended for Public use. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any and all computers or devices. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
Do you deal with multiple entries for a name? Something you might think of is an XREF file. Build it with a key of the UPCASE name, removing spaces, comma's, periods, @FM, @VM, etc. to make it basically letters (and maybe numbers). Then put the original value in an attribute and use the LOCATE on it to keep the printable versions of the name in sorted order. You could easily make the update of this XREF file into a subroutine that could be called from another program or as a main program that uses a SELECT.LIST, depending on your needs. From the numbers you've mentioned, it should be very fast and clean, provided you set up the subroutine cleanly. BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... I was just concerned about this record, as names get added individually -- I thought about doing an UPCASE on a memory version of the MultiValue list, but once that list gets to having 100 or 200 names on it, would the 'hit' for doing an UPCASE on an in-memory version be 'less than' the disk-access time for the larger item... Falls into the 'is there a better way' category of thinking. Like I said -- D3 has sorting WAY better than U2 in this area. (*Just* this one area, but in this case, it's all I'm talking about! g) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jjuser ud2 Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... Hmm...doing it programmatically...multi-dimensional array? DAVINCI,LEONARDO Doe,John Jesse,Sally becomes [1] [2] DAVINCI,LEONARDO DAVINCI,LEONARDO Doe,John DOE,JOHN Raphael,Sally RAPHAEL,SALLY And then you can sort by [2], but display [1]? That way it just stays in memory and the data stored in the database remains the same? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
David: Create a virtual dictionary that upper cases the name. Then you sort by the UCNAME but display the normal name. This works for me. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:51 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName. The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER. I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is' The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could 500 names in the list. My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL' into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute, and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed' for the sort. My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this! Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a 'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record? Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!) David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:51 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName. The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER. I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is' The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could 500 names in the list. My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL' into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute, and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed' for the sort. My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this! Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a 'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record? Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!) David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material not intended for Public use. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any and all computers or devices. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
I don't know about UD but in UV isn't there a way to turn off the case sensitivity? Eric -Original Message- From: David Wolverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:51 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... I have a need to sort people by LastName,FirstName. The issue is that we 'accept' data from lots of sources, some that are ProperCapped, some that are all lower, AND SOME THAT ARE ALL UPPER. I need to 'present' them correctly sorted, but show the data 'as it is' The record currently contains a MV list of the names 'as is' -- there could 500 names in the list. My way of handing it (now) is to open a New attribute that I put a 'ALL CAPS' version of the Name into, and then each insert, I so a LOCATE BY 'AL' into the new attribute, and insert the 'SORTNAME' into the new attribute, and the 'as TyPed NAme' as always - just now, we're not using the 'as typed' for the sort. My issue ... I've doubled the data being stored in order to accomplish this! Is there a more elegant, logical way to handle this issue besides having a 'SortName' attribute and an 'AsTyped' attribute in the record? Thanks for any thoughts for this Friday afternoon mind-tease! (Ah ... I miss D3's case insensitivity from time to time!!) David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
The issue for me is that I am using the list of employees within a program - so Virtual Dictionaries are not an option - displaying the data. I certainly don't want to sort it on use each time, which means I need to do an insert BY AL -- but in order to do that I have to have the list ready on read, but I insert names into the list one at a time -- hence I throught I would have to maintain two attributes -- one 'as keyed' and one in 'sort case' -- my other choice is to UPCASE the 'as keyed' each time I have to do an insert. I guess that's my question: Which is better Write a record with two sets of data, one 'as typed' one strictly for sorting, so that on the next insert, I just create a sort version of the new name, and insert it in both lists. The downside here is the record is larger. OR Use UPCASE on each need to insert to build the 'insert array' as needed, find the insert position in that array, then insert the 'AsTyped'. The downside to me was having to UPCASE each time an insert is needed. I'm trying to figure out the lesser of the evils! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:48 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... David: Create a virtual dictionary that upper cases the name. Then you sort by the UCNAME but display the normal name. This works for me. Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution
Is anyone else getting assaulted with daily spam targeted at addresses found in this forum? As you can see, I use SneakEmail.com for posting to forums rather than using my real email addresses. With a disposable email address created just for use in one place, I know immediately where spammers got the address they're using to send me spam. This also allows me to simply re-subscribe to the forum using a newly created address, and to unsubscribe and delete the address which has been compromised to the spammers. I have a different address for every website and forum where I need to provide an email address - a couple hundred over a period of years, and I don't have to endure a permanent spam problem because one of them has a problem with email harvesting bots. If you're getting spam as a result of being in this forum or any others, I highly recommend using the free services of sneakemail.com. I especially encourage you to upgrade to a US$2/month plan which has worthwhile benefits and supports the people who maintain it. And with that, I'm now going to unsubscribe, delete this address, and say goodbye to the recent spam invasion. Regards, Tony Gravagno Nebula RD TG@ always.munge.the.domainNebula-RnD.com (I receive no commission or other benefits when people use the services discussed here.) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UV - Files Stats Question
I need to select files in an account and determine if all the records fall in the 200% groups. This will be done in a Basic program. Other than FILE.STAT each file and examine the output, can it be done simpler ? Also if anyone is using FAST, can you tell me where FAST keeps the list of files under its control ? Thanks, Jim Koca --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
