Re: [UV] Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file
HS_FILE_ACCESS may be edited manually. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] COUNT modifying unix timestamp
It is normal behaviour with any file type that has a header (anything except Type 1/19). What happens is that the statistics area is updated (the things you report on using FILE.USAGE) with the latest count, so that things, including later COUNT requests, can use this result. There's also a file status flag that indicates whether the count is stale or not, so UniVerse can properly use it or not. Of course, updating the file header involves writing to the file. >From memory, RESIZE of the entire file will also update this count. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Swap array values? In UV
> The regular swap command doesn't work. > I tried swap a(1),a(2) it doesn't swap I just tried the swap statement and it seems to work okay: UV/aix 10.0.7 --- programme dim da(2); da(1)=1; da(2)=2 crt da(1),da(2) swap da(1),da(2) crt da(1),da(2) --- output 1 2 2 1 -- Stuart ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
unclassified RE: COUNT modifying Unix timestamp
David, I see the same effect on UV 10.0.15 on Win2K3 for Dynamic files, also for Dictionaries (type 3). LIST a file: no change to Windows file timestamp. COUNT the same file: Windows file timestamp is updated. ! Mike > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Eves, David > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:40 AM > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: COUNT modifying Unix timestamp > > > We have a client running UV 10.0.16 on HPUX 11i who has noted that a > Universe COUNT will modify the Unix timestamp of a file. > > Has this always been the case? > > Why does a supposedly read-only operation like COUNT modify the > timestamp but others such as LIST, SORT, etc. don't? > > Cheers, > David Eves The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file
Thanks, I went through the options on the HS.ADMIN menu, including HS.SCRUB and the HS_FILE_ACCESS file was created. For some reason it excluded the file I need from HS_FILE_ACCESS though, even though I added an @SELECT dictionary item. If I run CONVERT.SQL against the file (not using my live data file), I can then see it via ODBC in Excel, but the dict items don't work correctly. Is it safe to manually add a record for the non-SQL file to HS_FILE_ACCESS? Thanks, John Jeff Schasny wrote: First create an @SELECT item in the dictionarys of the files you are aiming at. Then logto HS.ADMIN and issue the HS.ADMIN command from TCL. Select Option #3 to activate access to files in an account. Whenever you change an @SELECT Item or want to add access to another file you can run HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO in the account rather than going back to the HS.ADMIN account and running option #4 (Update File Information Cache in an account). -Original Message- From: John Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:34 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: UV: Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file I'm trying to enable ODBC access to a standard UV non-SQL file and have found the following in the ODBC manual: "To make UniVerse files accessible to ODBC applications, you must run the ODBC file access utility in the account." However, they don't bother to say what this ODBC file access utility is called. I've tried listing the VOC LIKE ...HS... and ...MENU... but can't find anything relevant. Are they referring to HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO? TIA, John -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
FW: COUNT modifying unix timestamp
Oops, you are quite right, I didn't mention the file type but I was referring to static hashed files (Types 2 to 18). For example, the VOC in my test account is a type 3 file and only COUNT changes the timestamp, unless of course I write something to the file. LIST, SORT, SSELECT, HASH.TEST all have no effect on the timestamp. Cheers, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2004 9:30 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: COUNT modifying unix timestamp You don't mention the file type, but I am assuming it is a dynamic file. If it is, this is "normal". I recall the first release of reliable dynamic files had the feature of disallowing access to users without 'read and write' permission...which wasn't actually documented anywhere...ouch! I think you will find 'LIST' and other 'read-only' commands has the same effect. Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eves, David Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:40 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: COUNT modifying unix timestamp We have a client running UV 10.0.16 on HPUX 11i who has noted that a Universe COUNT will modify the unix timestamp of a file. Has this always been the case? Why does a supposedly read-only operation like COUNT modify the timestamp but others such as LIST, SORT, etc. don't? Cheers, David Eves -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UD] File block size with long keys
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Lewington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: [UD] File block size with long keys
> UD 6.0.7 on Windows
>
> Does anyone know if Unidata is doing something special writing data with
> long keys to a static file - and what that is?
>
> Running the following...
>
> KEYLENGTH=36
> DTALENGTH=0
> MODULO=1
> SEP=1
> NRECORDS=3
> EXECUTE 'CLEAR-FILE DATA SRLTEMP1'
> PCPERFORM 'memresize SRLTEMP1 ':MODULO:',':SEP:' TYPE 0 STATIC'
> OPEN "SRLTEMP1" TO SRLTEMP1 ELSE STOP
> FOR N=1 TO NRECORDS
> WRITE STR('0',DTALENGTH) ON SRLTEMP1,OCONV(N,'MR%':KEYLENGTH)
> NEXT N
> PCPERFORM 'guide SRLTEMP1 -o'
>
> ...shows that the block is overflowed, even though it's only got 3 records
> of less that 50 bytes each.
>
> 36 bytes looks like it's the cutoff on key length - below that the
overflow
> vanishes. Above that and any block with more than one item overflows.
With
> a block size of 2048, 86 bytes is the cutoff. Using a non-zero data
length
> makes no difference (ie 35 byte keys won't overflow even with 50 byte
data).
>
> I can't find anything in the manual saying what's going on, or
recommending
> different block sizes for files with long keys.
>
> Cheers
> Simon
>
Simon,
Well, it looks like nobody else is going to answer this one. Just from
observation, using Unidata PE on Windows and a hex editor, it appears that
even 2 records with keys 36 bytes long in a static file with blocksize 1024
will cause the key-and-displacement table to take the entire block, with the
data being put into overflow. On the other hand, with a blocksize 2048, I
put 10 records with 36-byte keys into a block without going into overflow.
I don't know what the algorithm is for determining when the group is forced
into overflow, but my gut feeling is, for longer keys, I would increase the
blocksize.
This was of interest to me because we have a few files, which, depending on
the size of the component data elements in the keys (codes which are defined
by our users), could easily reach your 36-byte size, so I took a quick look.
Another thing to be wary of when sizing files - sigh!
Susan M. Lynch
F.W. Davison & Company, Inc.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: COUNT modifying unix timestamp
You don't mention the file type, but I am assuming it is a dynamic file. If it is, this is "normal". I recall the first release of reliable dynamic files had the feature of disallowing access to users without 'read and write' permission...which wasn't actually documented anywhere...ouch! I think you will find 'LIST' and other 'read-only' commands has the same effect. Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eves, David Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:40 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: COUNT modifying unix timestamp We have a client running UV 10.0.16 on HPUX 11i who has noted that a Universe COUNT will modify the unix timestamp of a file. Has this always been the case? Why does a supposedly read-only operation like COUNT modify the timestamp but others such as LIST, SORT, etc. don't? Cheers, David Eves -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file
First create an @SELECT item in the dictionarys of the files you are aiming at. Then logto HS.ADMIN and issue the HS.ADMIN command from TCL. Select Option #3 to activate access to files in an account. Whenever you change an @SELECT Item or want to add access to another file you can run HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO in the account rather than going back to the HS.ADMIN account and running option #4 (Update File Information Cache in an account). -Original Message- From: John Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:34 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: UV: Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file I'm trying to enable ODBC access to a standard UV non-SQL file and have found the following in the ODBC manual: "To make UniVerse files accessible to ODBC applications, you must run the ODBC file access utility in the account." However, they don't bother to say what this ODBC file access utility is called. I've tried listing the VOC LIKE ...HS... and ...MENU... but can't find anything relevant. Are they referring to HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO? TIA, John -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
COUNT modifying unix timestamp
We have a client running UV 10.0.16 on HPUX 11i who has noted that a Universe COUNT will modify the unix timestamp of a file. Has this always been the case? Why does a supposedly read-only operation like COUNT modify the timestamp but others such as LIST, SORT, etc. don't? Cheers, David Eves -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
UV: Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file
I'm trying to enable ODBC access to a standard UV non-SQL file and have found the following in the ODBC manual: "To make UniVerse files accessible to ODBC applications, you must run the ODBC file access utility in the account." However, they don't bother to say what this ODBC file access utility is called. I've tried listing the VOC LIKE ...HS... and ...MENU... but can't find anything relevant. Are they referring to HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO? TIA, John -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Wintegrate, UD
Charles, Thanks for the plug on the Nucleus / Accuterm Graphical User Interface, however a note of extreme caution: I would only recommend Nucleus: * to those who just want to get the job done without having to re-invent the wheel * to those who have no desire to make a career of learning about gui objects and their attendent complexity * to those who want the grunt work done for them I would NOT recommend Nucleus if: * one has lots of time on one's hands and merely needs to look busy * one wishes to learn about GUI objects in order to get out of pick/U2 * you need to justify your existence and make your boss think that you are actually accomplishing something by spending three days to create a GUI screen using object calls that you could have created in ten minutes with Nucleus. * you have an overwhelming desire to increase your maintenance efforts by requiring separate rules for both GUI and character. Lee Bacall http://www.binarystar.com Nucleus technology Phone: +1 (954) 791-8575, emergency# 954-937-8989 - Original Message - From: "Results" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:14 AM Subject: Re: Wintegrate, UD > BjÃrn, > You might also want to look at the AccuSoft graphical interface before you settle on wIntegrate. > > - Charles 'I also like the Nucleus/Accusoft Combo' Barouch > -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: set.term.type,Redhat 8.0, UV 10.0.9
You may want to look at the setleds program, which can change the state of the num lock keys (man setleds). On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Steve Richmond wrote: > Hi All, > We are in the process of migrating fron HPUX 10.20, UV 9.4.1.1 to Redhat > 8.0, UV 10.0.9. We are having a problem with Universe SET.TERM.TYPE > command. When we do 'SET.TERM.TYPE VT320" the terminal emulator (QVT > 5.2) switches the number pad from "numeric" to "application' mode. This > does not happen on our current system. Has anyone else experienced this > problem? If so, What did you do to remedy this? Thanks, > > Steve > > -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
UV 10.1 on RedHat AS 2.1
Anyone running UV on RedHat AS 2.1 and planning to upgrade to UV 10.1? I'm preparing to migrate to RH AS 2.1 and need the MQ functionality built into UV 10.1. IBM has told me that it hasn't been ported yet but I can't get an answer on a timeframe for the port. Just wondering if anyone else has any info on this. TIA, John -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Memo: RE: multi-currency
Mike Randall wrote: Not sure if converting based on invoice date is legit. That's not the real value of the cash when you got it. Hence, the concept of gains and losses for rate fluctuations. Your actual USD balances will never match the computer with your strategy. Another level of converting is needed. -SNIP- if customer purchases 3,000.00 EUR of parts, that will convert to some USD amount and written to our files in USD. when the customer pays 3,000.00 EUR for the parts, we will convert to USD based on the day that the order was placed. You're correct. We accept payment in both US and Canadian dollars and we never know exactly how much US $ we'll get paid by our Canadian dollar customers until their checks clear. What we do is inflate our Canadian prices slightly above the current exchange rate break-even point. Both our Canadian price and US price are stored in the order record at the time the order is placed. When we post the cash payment we enter the amount they paid in Canadian dollars, which is the exact amount they were charged, then the amount the bank posted to our account in US dollars. The posting program takes the difference between what was deposited and the order's original US dollar amount and puts it into a GL account we call "gain or loss on exchange". Ideally our fake exchange rate is high enough that we always see a gain, but the accounting comes out correct regardless. -John -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
set.term.type,Redhat 8.0, UV 10.0.9
Hi All, We are in the process of migrating fron HPUX 10.20, UV 9.4.1.1 to Redhat 8.0, UV 10.0.9. We are having a problem with Universe SET.TERM.TYPE command. When we do 'SET.TERM.TYPE VT320" the terminal emulator (QVT 5.2) switches the number pad from "numeric" to "application' mode. This does not happen on our current system. Has anyone else experienced this problem? If so, What did you do to remedy this? Thanks, Steve -- Steve Richmond Associate Director of Computer Applications Morehead State University 606-783-5236 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] RESIZE sometimes changes permissions
I had ownership and permission changes when it was a directory file of some sort, like dynamic files. We stopped doing resizes as root, and that solved it. You may also want to fiddle with your umask. I didn't see it happen with files that resided in my current working directory, just the ones in subdirectories below it. At the time, I had a number of versions, and it was happening on 9.5, so the ticket was closed with the advice to upgrade to 10.x. "Our greatest duty in this life is to help others. And please, if you can't help them, could you at least not hurt them?" - H.H. the Dalai Lama "When buying & selling are controlled by legislation, the first thing to be bought & sold are the legislators" - P.J. O'Rourke Dan Fitzgerald From: "Stevenson, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: U2 Users Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [UV] RESIZE sometimes changes permissions Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:47:28 -0500 Occasionally RESIZE changes the permissions on a file but usually it doesn't. Has anyone else seen this? Do you know the rules about it? Is it a bug? A twist of unix security I don't know about? As root, I resized hundreds of files over the weekend, none owned by root. Most were fine, but I had half a dozen or so where write permissions were changed. Owner & group remained the same. I saw this once before when before when changing &SAVEDLISTS& from type-1 to -19. HPUX11, UV10.0.16. Chas. Stevenson -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _ Check out the great features of the new MSN 9 Dial-up, with the MSN Dial-up Accelerator. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/ -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Swap array values? In UV
It's an 'old as the hills' C programmers' trick Which is no relection on Glenn of course ... Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 February 2004 16:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Swap array values? In UV In a message dated 2/13/2004 11:10:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Within BASIC, try > > array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y)); > array(y)=BITXOR(array(y),array(x)); > array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y)); > > No temp variable used. > ROFL. Nice way to take a simple process and make it unintelligible. You get the gold ribbon. Will -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen. This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan. DISCLAIMER This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microgen Information Management Solutions http://www.microgen.co.uk -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Hashing Algorithm
In a message dated 2/14/2004 3:00:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Is that one similiar to the 'only' one available to native systems, which > many people have known for years? > The native Pick algorithm was published twenty years ago by Ultimate. It's in the public domain. Will -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Swap array values? In UV
In a message dated 2/13/2004 11:10:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Within BASIC, try > > array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y)); > array(y)=BITXOR(array(y),array(x)); > array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y)); > > No temp variable used. > ROFL. Nice way to take a simple process and make it unintelligible. You get the gold ribbon. Will -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Wintegrate, UD
Björn I would start with loading the host subroutines onto my MV platform. Check the \Program Files\Wintegrate\Host directory. There's a script called Inst_Pgm.wis you can call it from the wintegrate Run->Script menu. It will install the MV API on your host, make sure you're in an account you want to do this to. There are a number of host demo programs on the host that you can run and take apart to see how it all fits together, and shows different techniques. There's also numerious examples loaded on witegrate dealing with dialogs that are run externally from the host. I've used both the dialog designer using external wis files, and creating the dialogs within universe code. There's advantages to both. I'm currently designing a program basic program that will take a file created using the dialog designer and create a basic program equivalent. Gerral -Original Message- From: Björn Eklund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:30 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Wintegrate, UD Hi, We are currently running an old green line GUI. I was told by IBM to look at Wintegrate to make my applications look more modern. I've downloaded the Wintegrate trial version but I don't know where to start. I've modified the coloring setting to get certain fields look like windows textboxes etc. But I'm sure that there must be another way of using Wintegrate to fullfill my needs. Anyone who knows where I should start? Should I redraw my screens in the Wintegrate dialog designer or what? I have downloaded all the manuals but can't find anything at a glance that shows me where to start my GUItilazation. TIA Björn Eklund -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Wintegrate, UD
BjÃrn, You might also want to look at the AccuSoft graphical interface before you settle on wIntegrate. - Charles 'I also like the Nucleus/Accusoft Combo' Barouch Thomas Derwin wrote: You might find something useful in the code samples that come with Wintegrate. In Winteg 3, they're in the "example" subdirectory. Hope this helps, Tom -Original Message- From: BjÃrn Eklund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 2/16/2004 4:30 AM I've downloaded the Wintegrate trial version but I don't know where to start. Should I redraw my screens in the Wintegrate dialog designer or what? I have downloaded all the manuals but can't find anything at a glance that shows me where to start my GUItilazation. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Using OpenOffice with UniVerse/Unidata - request for U2 users to be involved
Ian Stuart wrote: Although I have requested IBM to look at some of the issues associated with OOo and U2 it would appear that the 'not invented here' syndrome prevents them from doing anything constructive; this is not a criticism, just an observation. I am surprised though that with IBM really pushing the Linux strategy that OOo is not seen as an alternative to MS Office for Linux on the desktop. Actually, it's more of this: "As part of its initiative to put Linux on the desktop, IBM Corp. wants to migrate Microsoft Corp.'s Office suite to Linux. Microsoft said it's not involved and suggests that IBM might do it by emulation." from: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/02/13/HNlinuxoffice_1.html I don't think this is a good move...MS-Office is bloatware, and as MS patents it's XML formats (the Patent Office is so stoopid! Tomorrow, I will patent Air, and start charging everyone on Earth usage fees!), many may move away from it, if only for interoperablity sake. But that's just my personal opinions. We have someone here is is working on OOo and integrating it with our Unvierse product, Medformix under our version of Linux, MfxLinux. You can email him at [EMAIL PROTECTED] He doesn't get onto mailing lists. ttyl Farrell -- "Politicians should read science fiction, not westerns and detective stories." -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke Farrell J. McGovern Crowell Systems Linux Systems Admin.Toll Free (US and Canada) 1-800-366-4564 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://crowellsystems.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[UV] RESIZE sometimes changes permissions
Occasionally RESIZE changes the permissions on a file but usually it doesn't. Has anyone else seen this? Do you know the rules about it? Is it a bug? A twist of unix security I don't know about? As root, I resized hundreds of files over the weekend, none owned by root. Most were fine, but I had half a dozen or so where write permissions were changed. Owner & group remained the same. I saw this once before when before when changing &SAVEDLISTS& from type-1 to -19. HPUX11, UV10.0.16. Chas. Stevenson -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Wintegrate, UD
You might find something useful in the code samples that come with Wintegrate. In Winteg 3, they're in the "example" subdirectory. Hope this helps, Tom -Original Message- From: BjÃrn Eklund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 2/16/2004 4:30 AM I've downloaded the Wintegrate trial version but I don't know where to start. Should I redraw my screens in the Wintegrate dialog designer or what? I have downloaded all the manuals but can't find anything at a glance that shows me where to start my GUItilazation. - IMPORTANT WARNING: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, including PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL HEALTH INFORMATION which is intended for the use of the person to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail/attachment is not the intended recipient, employee, or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, reproduction, reading, or copying of this information is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete the related e-mail and all attachments and notify the sender immediately (reply e-mail) and the LabCorp Privacy Officer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call (877) 23-HIPAA / (877) 234-4722. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Dale Bertke is out of the office
I get these through the list server. Clif, can you stop these at the server? Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Systems Analyst MAMSI 301-360-8839 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dale Bertke is out of the office I will be out of the office starting Sun 02/15/2004 and will not return until Thu 02/19/2004. I am in Ann Arbor. I will respond when I return. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users Notice of Confidentiality: The information included and/or attached in this electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, distribution or the taking of action in reliance on the contents of the information is prohibited. If you believe that you have received the message in error, please notify the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or disclosing it. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
How you grow journal entry limitation
we runing UniVerse 9.5.2 r11 OS Tru64 5.1a for a merge off two database, we must input more than 31888 records par day, the problem is the journal have a limitation to 15000 ~ records, It is possible to grow this limitation thanks for help Garcia Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] Garcia Carlos IT Departement EFG Private Bank 24 Quai du Seujet 1211 Genève 2 Tél. +4122 906 72 01 Fax. +4122 906 71 77 Email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender immediately and delete the copy from your system.E FG is not responsible for, nor endorses, any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information contained in this communication. EFG cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender. Should you require any further information, please contact the Compliance Manager on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Wintegrate, UD
Hi, We are currently running an old green line GUI. I was told by IBM to look at Wintegrate to make my applications look more modern. I've downloaded the Wintegrate trial version but I don't know where to start. I've modified the coloring setting to get certain fields look like windows textboxes etc. But I'm sure that there must be another way of using Wintegrate to fullfill my needs. Anyone who knows where I should start? Should I redraw my screens in the Wintegrate dialog designer or what? I have downloaded all the manuals but can't find anything at a glance that shows me where to start my GUItilazation. TIA Björn Eklund -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Hashing Algorithm
Jose, I would recommend taking a look at FAST (from Fitzgerand and Long). This performs an analysis by type as well as scheduling resizes and other good things. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of José Luis Gutiérrez de la Peza Sent: 13 February 2004 17:32 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: Hashing Algorithm Chuck , I am a Business Partner of IBM in Mexico, and I sell U2 products since 1992 with VMark, The Wish to know how the algorithm works for each file type is to be able to help one of my customers that have a big installation (1000 users) and He isn't very happy with his application performance, after he used the HASH.HELP as a guide for the last 4 years. Jose Luis This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan. DISCLAIMER This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microgen Information Management Solutions http://www.microgen.co.uk -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Hashing Algorithm
If it's classed as a "trade secret", then IBM will have to prove they took "all reasonable measures" to keep it secret. If it was taught to people on the internals course and those people weren't asked to sign an NDA, then bang goes its secret status. And that includes all the people who went on courses run by Informix, Ardent, VMARK et al... Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 February 2004 15:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hashing Algorithm In a message dated 2/13/2004 6:18:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have the algorithms (from a legal source long before IBM acquired the > product) but because they are now secret I cannot divulge the details. They > are, however, extremely simple except for the dynamic algortihms which are > rather more exciting. > That's a interesting question. I have to say that in general IMHO a company cannot retroactively "seize" control of something that at one time was freely available. Something in the US about seizure without a warrant? Bill of rights or something? Will "I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet" Johnson -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users *** This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain private and confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error or telephone ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your information system. Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 9911 7799, Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582 2333. *** -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
